<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite.dtd" [
<!ENTITY % external-entities SYSTEM "./extEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY % internal-entities SYSTEM "./intEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY philldd1 SYSTEM "philldd1.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill103 SYSTEM "phill103.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill117 SYSTEM "phill117.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill037 SYSTEM "phill037.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill209 SYSTEM "phill209.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill133 SYSTEM "phill133.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill215 SYSTEM "phill215.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill219 SYSTEM "phill219.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill223 SYSTEM "phill223.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill147 SYSTEM "phill147.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill229 SYSTEM "phill229.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill069 SYSTEM "phill069.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill159 SYSTEM "phill159.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill169 SYSTEM "phill169.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill179 SYSTEM "phill179.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill185 SYSTEM "phill185.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill517 SYSTEM "phill517.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill193 SYSTEM "phill193.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill357 SYSTEM "phill357.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill199 SYSTEM "phill199.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY philltp1 SYSTEM "philltp1.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY philltp2 SYSTEM "philltp2.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phillfp1 SYSTEM "phillfp1.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phillfp2 SYSTEM "phillfp2.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill562 SYSTEM "phill562.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill567 SYSTEM "phill567.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill565 SYSTEM "phill565.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill569 SYSTEM "phill569.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill571 SYSTEM "phill571.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill573 SYSTEM "phill573.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill575 SYSTEM "phill575.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phill577 SYSTEM "phill577.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phillvs1 SYSTEM "phillvs1.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY phillvs2 SYSTEM "phillvs2.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
]>
<TEI.2>
  <teiHeader type="" status="new">
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title><emph>The History of the Colored Methodist Episcopal Church in America: Comprising Its Organization, Subsequent Development and Present Status:</emph>
Electronic Edition.</title>
        <author>Phillips, C. H. (Charles Henry), 1858-1951. </author>
        <funder>Funding from the Library of Congress/Ameritech National Digital Library Competition supported the electronic publication of this title.</funder>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text scanned (OCR) by</resp>
          <name>Richard Musselwhite</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Images scanned by</resp>
          <name>Richard Musselwhite</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
          <name> Andrew Leiter</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <editionStmt>
        <edition>First edition, <date>2000</date></edition>
      </editionStmt>
      <extent>ca. 1.1MB</extent>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>Academic Affairs Library, UNC-CH</publisher>
        <pubPlace>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, </pubPlace>
        <date>2000.</date>
        <availability status="unknown">
          <p>© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina 
at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching and personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the text.</p>
        </availability>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <biblFull>
          <titleStmt>
            <title type="title page">The History of the Colored Methodist Episcopal Church in America: Comprising Its Organization, Subsequent Development and Present Status</title>
            <author>C. H. Phillips, A.M., M.D., D.D., LL.D.</author>
          </titleStmt>
          <editionStmt>
            <edition>Third Edition</edition>
          </editionStmt>
          <extent>  2 v. in 1: 623p., ill.</extent>
          <publicationStmt>
            <pubPlace>Jackson, Tennessee</pubPlace>
            <publisher>Publishing House C.M.E. Church</publisher>
            <date>1925</date>
            <authority/>
          </publicationStmt>
          <notesStmt>
            <note anchored="yes">Call Number 287.8 P558A  
(Divinity School Library, Duke University)</note>
          </notesStmt>
        </biblFull>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <projectDesc>
        <p>The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-CH
digitization project, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South</hi>.</p>
      </projectDesc>
      <editorialDecl>
        <p>This electronic edition has been created by Optical
Character Recognition (OCR). OCR-ed text has been compared against the
original document and corrected.  The text has been encoded using the
recommendations for Level 4 of the TEI in Libraries Guidelines.</p>
        <p>Original grammar, punctuation, and spelling have been preserved.  Encountered
typographical errors have been preserved, and appear in red type.</p>
        <p>All footnotes are inserted at the point of reference within paragraphs.</p>
        <p>Any hyphens occurring in line breaks have been removed, and the trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding line.</p>
        <p>All quotation marks, em dashes and ampersand have been transcribed as
entity references.</p>
        <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as ” and “
respectively.</p>
        <p>All single right and left quotation marks are encoded as ’ and ‘ respectively.</p>
        <p>All em dashes are encoded as —</p>
        <p>Indentation in lines has not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Running titles have not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Spell-check and verification made against printed text using Author/Editor (SoftQuad) and Microsoft Word spell check programs.</p>
      </editorialDecl>
      <classDecl>
        <taxonomy id="lcsh">
          <bibl>
            <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings, </title>
            <edition>21st edition, 1998</edition>
          </bibl>
        </taxonomy>
      </classDecl>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <langUsage>
        <language id="eng">English</language>
        <language id="fre">French</language>
        <language id="lat">Latin</language>
      </langUsage>
      <textClass>
        <keywords scheme="lcsh">
          <list type="simple">
            <item>Colored Methodist Episcopal Church -- History.</item>
            <item>Colored Methodist Episcopal Church -- Clergy -- Biography.</item>
            <item>African American Methodists -- History.</item>
            <item>African American Methodists -- Biography.</item>
            <item>African American clergy -- Biography.</item>
            <item>African Americans -- Religion.</item>
            <item>Methodism -- History.</item>
            <item>United States -- Church history.</item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change>
        <date>2001-08-16, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Celine Noel and Wanda Gunther </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> revised TEIHeader and created catalog 
record for the electronic edition.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>2000-07-14, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Jill Kuhn, </name>
          <resp>project manager, </resp>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished TEI-conformant encoding and final proofing.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>2000-07-13, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Andrew Leiter</name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> finished TEI/SGML encoding</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>2000-06-20, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name/>
          <resp>Richard Musselwhite</resp>
        </respStmt>
        <item> finished scanning (OCR) and proofing.</item>
      </change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <group>
      <text>
        <front rend="italics">
          <div1 type="title page">
            <p>
              <figure id="title1" entity="philltp1">
                <p>[1st Title Page Image]</p>
              </figure>
            </p>
          </div1>
          <div1 type="verso">
            <p>
              <figure id="verso1" entity="phillvs1">
                <p>[1st Title Page Verso Image]</p>
              </figure>
            </p>
          </div1>
          <titlePage>
            <pb id="philltitlepage" n="titlepage"/>
            <docTitle>
              <titlePart rend="italics" type="main">THE HISTORY<lb/>
OF THE<lb/>
Colored Methodist Episcopal Church<lb/>
IN AMERICA:</titlePart>
              <titlePart type="subtitle">COMPRISING<lb/>
ITS ORGANIZATION, SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT<lb/>
AND PRESENT STATUS.</titlePart>
              <titlePart type="subtitle">
                <hi rend="italics">BOOK ONE</hi>
              </titlePart>
            </docTitle>
            <byline>BY
<docAuthor>C. H. Phillips, A.M., M.D., D.D., LL.D.,<lb/>
A Bishop of The Church.</docAuthor></byline>
            <docEdition>
              <hi rend="italics">THIRD EDITION</hi>
            </docEdition>
            <docImprint><pubPlace>JACKSON, TENN.:</pubPlace>
<publisher>PUBLISHING HOUSE C. M. E. CHURCH.<lb/>
H. P. PORTER, AGENT.</publisher>
<docDate>1925.</docDate></docImprint>
            <pb id="phillverso" n="verso"/>
            <docImprint>Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1898,<lb/>
By C. H. PHILLIPS,<lb/>
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.</docImprint>
          </titlePage>
          <div1 type="dedication">
            <p>
              <figure id="dd" entity="philldd1">
                <p>[Dedication Image]</p>
              </figure>
            </p>
          </div1>
          <div1 type="dedication">
            <pb id="phill3" n="3"/>
            <head>Dedication.</head>
            <p>TO MY BELOVED, SAINTED MOTHER,<lb/>
WHO GAVE ME MY FIRST LESSONS IN SPIRITUAL THINGS:<lb/>
TO THE HUNDREDS OF YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN<lb/>
WHO ARE IN OUR SCHOOLS IN PURSUIT OF AN EDUCATION; AND<lb/>
TO THE ENTIRE CHURCH IN PARTICULAR, AND<lb/>
TO THE READING PUBLIC IN GENERAL,<lb/>
<hi rend="italics">THIS BOOK IS AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATED</hi><lb/>
BY THE AUTHOR.</p>
          </div1>
          <div1 type="frontispiece">
            <pb id="phill4" n="4"/>
            <p>
              <figure id="frontis1" entity="phillfp1">
                <p>REV. C. H. PHILLIPS, D.D.<lb/>[1st Frontispiece Image]</p>
              </figure>
            </p>
          </div1>
          <div1 type="preface">
            <pb id="phill5" n="5"/>
            <head>PREFACE.</head>
            <p>THERE is generally a universal desire felt in the votaries of
any institution or organization to know something of its rise,
progress, and subsequent position; and no less is the desire to
learn of the prominent characters that have largely been instrumental
in making these results possible. The Colored Methodist
Episcopal Church is now in its twenty-eighth year as an
organization, and it is not too early for some one to attempt to
write its history. For some time the Church has been indebted
to Rev. F. M. Hamilton for his “Plain Account of the C. M.
E. Church,” a pamphlet of 136 pages. This has been our only
published record, and has met a long-felt want. When we began
this work it was not our intention to write a history, but
rather to write up some matter which we purposed to include
in a book to be known as “Our Twenty-Fifth Mile-Stone.” This
work was to be a compilation of the cuts and communications
that appeared in the Quarto Centennial Number of the <hi>Christian
Index</hi>, May 11, 1895. But as we wrote the work grew upon
us, and finally we decided to discard the idea of producing
“Our Twenty-Fifth Mile-Stone” and write “The History of the
Colored Methodist Episcopal Church” instead. It was not
without some misgivings that we pursued this undertaking.
We had no books containing any considerable amount of information
in regard to our Church to which we could refer. Indeed,
no such books exist. But fortunately for us, we came into
the possession of some old copies of the <hi rend="italics">Christian Index</hi>, the official
organ of the Church. From 1870 to 1878, the paper then
being published monthly, we obtained almost every copy. The
bishops wrote more in those days than now, and from their communications
and those of other prominent writers we were reliably informed
of all the important doings and movements in the
Church. Since 1878, the year we began our ministerial career,
we have been identified with and fully cognizant of almost every
move the Church has made. These qualifications should
<pb id="phill6" n="6"/>
in some degree evidence the fitness of the author for assuming
the responsibility of writing a history of the Church. It has
not been our purpose to write biographies of the preachers, but
mention has been made of some of those who have been prominent
in the Church and in previous General Conferences.
The author will be more than amply repaid for the labor he
has expended in writing this history if a generous constituency
will give it an impartial consideration; if it to them, in any appreciable
degree, represents the purposes for which it was designed;
and if it receives a circulation that will place it in many
homes throughout the land. In conclusion we desire to reiterate
that our subject has been to give the Church a plain, practical
history of its doings and movements from the General Conference
of December, 1870, down to the present time. How
far we have accomplished these ends must be determined by
those who will carefully peruse these pages.</p>
            <closer> <signed>C. H. P.</signed>
<dateline>Jackson, Tenn., April, 1898.</dateline></closer>
          </div1>
          <div1 rend="italics" type="biograpghy">
            <pb id="phill7" n="7"/>
            <head>BIOGRAPHY OF THE AUTHOR.</head>
            <byline>BY J. W. SMITH, D.D.,<lb/>
Editor <hi rend="italics">Star of Zion</hi>, Official Paper of the A. M. E. Zion Church.</byline>
            <p>IT affords me extreme pleasure to introduce to the public
generally one of the brightest ministerial stars in the Colored
Methodist Episcopal Church in America—Rev. C. H. Phillips,
D.D. He was born in Milledgeville, Ga., January 17, 1858.
His parents had twelve children, of whom he was the tenth.
The two youngest died before they had reached ten years,
leaving him the youngest of the family, a place which he has
filled for more than a quarter of a century. His mother was
named Nancy and his father George Washington. They were
both converted when young, and thus were able to throw
around their children a holy influence which shaped their
lives for good and for fields of usefulness when they had
reached manhood and womanhood. His father has been a
gospel minister for more than fifty years. In June of 1890 his
dear mother, at the age of seventy, laid down the cross, took
up the crown, and went home. Of the ten children that
grew up to mature age, four were boys, and all are now
ministers of the gospel save the oldest brother, John, who died
about six or seven years ago between the age of fifty and sixty,
after having traveled about twenty-two years as an itinerant
minister and member of the Georgia Conference.</p>
            <p>At the age of seventeen young Phillips was happily converted,
and joined Trinity C. M. E. Church, in which he had been
reared, the Rev. Frank Ford, who has since died, and who
during his lifetime was one of the leaders of the Georgia Conference,
being his pastor. With his conversion began the unfolding
of those avenues which have led him to his present position
and status.</p>
            <p>December 16, 1880, he was married, by Rev. J. Braden, D.D.,
President of Central Tennessee College, to Miss Lucy Ellis Tappan
(a daughter of a prominent Baptist minister in Nashville),
a graduate of Fisk University. Cultivated in mind and heart,
<pb id="phill8" n="8"/>
and influenced by the Holy Spirit, she has ever been his helpmeet,
and has done much to make the favorable impression he
now enjoys.</p>
            <p>Educationally Dr. Phillips is a ripe scholar. When a boy
he always had a love for books, and received an elementary
education at home while working on his father's farm. He
would go to school after the crop was laid by during the summer
and after the farm produce was gathered in the fall. Along
this line he continued his education, making progress in the
science of farming as well as in books. Having an insatiable
thirst for a deeper education, whereby he might be the better
prepared for the Christian ministry, to which honored position
he felt a divine call immediately after his conversion, his father,
after the holidays of 1875, sent him to Atlanta University,
Atlanta, Ga., where he joined the Junior Preparatory Class, and
continued in this institution until he had completed his Sophomore
year in college.</p>
            <p>In September, 1878, while Principal of the city schools of
Barnesville, Ga., he was licensed to preach by Rev. R. T. White,
the presiding elder at that time of the Barnesville District and
still the acknowledged leader of the Georgia Conference. Thus
was carried into consummation the impression made on him
just after his conversion.</p>
            <p>Two months after he had been licensed to preach he went to
Nashville, Tenn., and entered Central Tennessee College, where
be could study theology with his classical studies. He progressed
rapidly. He never lost a year nor was he ever turned
back. He read Latin and Greek with an ease that delighted
his professors and astonished his classmates. On entering this
college he found that he was behind his class (Junior Classical)
in mathematics and ahead in the languages; therefore in mathematics
he formed a class of one, and had to “wade through”
this science all alone. Loomis' ten books in geometry, spherical
trigonometry, surveying, analytical geometry, and differential
and integral calculus, he studied alone, and he never received
a mark below ninety, marking on a scale of one hundred
as perfect. By this time he had caught up with his class in
mathematics, and with them took up their last study in that
science, a work on philosophy, by D. Olmstead, LL.D. He
easily led his class in the languages, and in the absence of the
<pb id="phill9" n="9"/>
professor would often hear his class recite in “Horace” and in
“Odyssey.”</p>
            <p>In May, 1880, he graduated as Bachelor of Arts from Central
Tennessee College. In this same school he received his theological
training, and graduated from there in medicine in 1882.
During the years of 1884 and 1885 he was Principal of Lane
Institute, then known as the Jackson High School. He gave
form to this school by grading the classes, creating its curriculum,
and publishing its first catalogue. At the meeting of
the Board of Trustees in May, 1885, he, by a motion made by
himself and seconded by Rev. W. T. Thomas, of Alabama,
had the name changed from Jackson High School to Lane
Institute. Since that time the school has been named
Lane College. In this year 1885 his alma mater conferred
upon him the degree of Master of Arts. In June, 1890, Philander
Smith College, of Little Rock, Ark., and Wiley-University,
of Marshall, Tex., almost at the same time (he being
ignorant of the intentions of these two schools, which are
among the best of the great M. E. Church), conferred upon
him the degree of “Doctor of Divinity.” Thus step by step, by
assiduous study, which will accomplish almost anything, this
promising young divine has climbed from the lowest to his
present heights in the intellectual ladder.</p>
            <p>He joined the West Tennessee Conference at Trenton in
1879. During his college days he served the Pilot Knob Circuit
with great success. This was his first itinerant work.
Here he held his first revival, which resulted in thirty-five accessions
to the church. He made a splendid report at this
Conference, and was ordained a deacon by Bishop L. H. Holsey.</p>
            <p>In December, 1885, his Conference met at Memphis, and
Bishop Lane appointed him to the pastorate of Collins Chapel,
the leading appointment in Tennessee. At this Conference
he was elected a delegate to the General Conference which
met in 1886 at Augusta, Ga. He was not only the youngest
man ever appointed to Collins Chapel up to that time, but
also the youngest ever elected by his Conference a delegate to
any preceding General Conference. His rising prominence in
his denomination was evidenced by the fact that the bishops
unanimously nominated, and his General Conference then in
session at Augusta confirmed him as a proper person to go as a
<pb id="phill10" n="10"/>
fraternal delegate to the General Conference of the great M. E.
Church, South, which was in session in Richmond, Va. Bishop
Holsey was the first delegate ever sent to this body, and Rev.
Phillips was not only the second, but the first ever selected
from the rank and file of his Church. His speech before that
Conference was most favorably commented upon by the press
of the country.</p>
            <p>When he had rounded out two successful years at Collins
Chapel, adding one hundred and forty persons to the church,
finishing up its front, a part of which at that time was exposed,
running up the brick work of the tower to its present height,
and making round reports each year at the Conference, he was
at Jackson, Tenn., in December, 1887, transferred to the Virginia
Conference and stationed at Washington, D. C., as pastor
of Israel Metropolitan C. M. E. Church. Here he entered upon
a career that gave him a national reputation. Washington
opened new fields and new facilities and opportunities for
further development. He found the church embarrassed by a
debt of $13,400, upon which the members were paying seven
per cent. interest. The interest alone amounted to over $900 a
year, yet he was able to keep it down and reduce the principal.
The winter of 1889, just after the holidays, he began a revival
which resulted in one hundred and five additions to the church.
Some of the present trustees and stewards of Israel Church
were converted in that revival.</p>
            <p>Dr. Phillips has traveled extensively. In the spring of 1889
the Sabbath-School Union of the District of Columbia elected
delegates to attend the first World's Sabbath-School Convention,
which convened in London in July, 1889. He was not
present at any of the Union meetings in Washington, but in his
absence was one of the three delegates elected, Rev. W. H.
Brooks and Rev. George Moore being the others. June 19,
1889, they sailed, having in their company Rev. A. Walters,
who has since been elected to the bishopric of the A. M. E.
Zion Church. He spent two months abroad, traveling through
France, England, Ireland, and Scotland, visiting such cities as
Liverpool, London, Manchester, Paris, Edinburgh, and Glasgow.
He preached in several of these cities and lectured upon some
phase of the negro problem. Returning to America, he met his
Conference at Lynchburg, Va., in October, 1889, and was elected
<pb id="phill11" n="11"/>
the second time as a delegate to the General Conference of his
Church, which met in Little Rock in 1890.</p>
            <p>In 1891 he was one of the delegates to the Ecumenical Conference,
which met in Washington, D. C., in October; was
the only representative of his Church on the program; and
his able speech before that learned body elicited a most favorable
comment. The Washington <hi rend="italics">Evening Star</hi> said: “One of the
most earnest and eloquent addresses of the day was the one on
‘The Legal Prohibition of the Saloon,’ by Rev. C. H. Phillips,
D.D., of this city, a well-known preacher of the C. M. E.
Church. When he left the platform he was presented with a
handsome bunch of flowers from the W. C. T. U., and Bishop
Wayman remarked that he had carried off the palm.” The
Washington <hi rend="italics">Post</hi> said: “The speaker in his tribute to water indulged
in a flight of florid rhetoric that captured the audience.
Dr. C. H. Phillips was heartily applauded as he stepped down
from the platform, and this demonstration was renewed as he
received a bouquet of flowers, and Bishop Wayman remarked
that he had carried off the palm.”</p>
            <p>Immediately after the adjournment of this great Conference,
his church in Washington (Israel Metropolitan) gave him a
farewell reception, at which Frederick Douglass, the lamented
Dr. Price, Dr. I. B. Scott, of Texas, his classmate, now editor of
the <hi rend="italics">Southwestern Christian Advocate</hi>, Hon. John C. Dancy, and
Dr. J. C. Waters made addresses. Nearly all the city pastors
of color and the writer were present. He was pastor of this
aristocratic church four years, being the only pastor of his
Church who served there that length of time. He reduced the
debt from $13,400 to $10,000, and the rate of interest from
seven to six per cent., and added two hundred members to the
church.</p>
            <p>His Conference meeting in Petersburg, Va., October, 1891,
transferred him to the Kentucky Conference, and stationed
him at Center Street Church, Louisville, Ky. The first year he
added sixty converts to the church, repaired and made it inside
the most beautiful church in the city; increased the congregation
considerably; raised in one collection $650, the largest
ever known in the history of that church; and at the close
of two years left the church in a much better condition than
he found it. His ability as a preacher was quickly recognized,
<pb id="phill12" n="12"/>
for the Louisville <hi rend="italics">Courier-Journal</hi> and Louisville <hi rend="italics">Commercial</hi> occasionally
reported his sermons. The daily <hi rend="italics">Commercial</hi>, after
publishing his sermon on the necessity of establishing a refuge
for colored girls, and also publishing his biography, closed
with these words: “Dr. Phillips' sermons are attracting large
congregations. Higher honors are waiting for him in his
Church, and it is generally conceded that he will yet reach the
goal.”</p>
            <p>At the Kentucky Conference, which met at Paducah September
27, 1893, he was the third time elected delegate to the
General Conference, which met in May, 1894, at Memphis,
Tenn.</p>
            <p>At the Paducah Conference Bishop Beebe appointed him
presiding elder of the Mt. Sterling District, which he improved
financially and spiritually. He was a-visitor to the
General Conference of the A. M. E. Zion Church, which
met at Pittsburg, Pa., and made a rousing speech, which was
loudly cheered. The Doctor is a popular man, and has a host
of popular friends in Zion Church. He attended the Parliament
of Religion in Chicago during the World's Fair, and he
and Bishop Holsey were members of the Advisory Council. At
the brilliant reception held in Chicago in the A. M. E. Zion
Church he grandly represented the C. M. E. Church on the
program.</p>
            <p>In 1894, at his General Conference, he was elected editor of
the <hi rend="italics">Christian Index</hi>, after having come within three votes of being
elected to the episcopal office.</p>
            <p>In 1896 he represented his Church before the General Conference
of the M. E. Church, which met at Cleveland, Ohio.
His address received favorable comment from the religious
and secular press.</p>
            <p>In October of 1896 he was one of the invited speakers at the
centennial celebration of the A. M. E. Zion Church, held in
New York City. He spoke on “The Relation of the C. M. E.
Church to the A. M. E. Zion Church.”</p>
            <p>At his Conference in October, 1897, he was elected for the
fourth time a delegate to the General Conference of his Church.</p>
            <p>As a man Dr. Phillips is modest, genial, dignified, sincere,
liberal, and broad in his sympathies. These qualities are daily
winning for him friends. As a preacher he is a splendid organizer,
<pb id="phill13" n="13"/>
a shrewd financier, a successful revivalist, a bustling
pastor, and a people-gatherer. As a speaker, whether in the
pulpit or on the platform, he is impressive, forceful, thoughtful,
suggestive, occasionally humorous, intensely earnest, his sermons
and speeches often being graced by choice flowers of
rhetoric and burning with fervid eloquence.</p>
            <p>This is an honest write-up of my friend, who in the fulness
of his intellectual powers is strong, loyal, and influential in the
grand denomination in which he is a pillar, an adornment, and
a support. May his influence and his possibilities continue to
shine with increasing luster as the days roll by!</p>
            <closer>
              <dateline>Charlotte, N. C.</dateline>
            </closer>
          </div1>
          <pb id="phill15" n="15"/>
          <div1 type="contents">
            <head>CONTENTS.</head>
            <list type="simple">
              <item>CHAPTER I.<lb/>
The General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church,
South—Important Question Asked and Answered—Religious
Oversight of the Slaves before the War—Some
White Preachers Who Labored for Their Spiritual Good—M. E. Church, South, Takes Initiatory Steps Looking
toward the Organization of Its Colored Contingent into
a Separate Church . . . . . <ref target="phill23" targOrder="U">23</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER II.<lb/>
The First General Conference—Bishop Paine, Senior Bishop
of the M. E. Church, South, Presiding—Revs. Green,
Watson, Taylor, and Others Present—Forming Committees
—Eight Conferences Represented, viz.: Memphis,
Kentucky, Arkansas, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi,
Alabama, and Texas—Remarks on W. H. Miles, R. H.
Vanderhorst, L. H. Holsey, Isaac Lane, I. H. Anderson,
and R. T. Thirgood . . . . . <ref target="phill27" targOrder="U">27</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER III.<lb/>
First General Conference—Report of the Committee on
Church Organization—The New Church Named . . . . . <ref target="phill34" targOrder="U">34</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER IV.<lb/>
First General Conference—A Publishing House Founded—
An Official Organ Created . . . . . <ref target="phill39" targOrder="U">39</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER V.<lb/>
First General Conference Concluded—Report of Committee
on Episcopacy—The Election of Two Bishops Recommended
—B . S. Newton and L. H. Holsey Appointed Tellers
—Divine Guidance Sought in the Election—W. H.
Miles and R. H. Vanderhorst Chosen Bishops—L. J.
Scurlock Elected Book Agent—Fixing Salaries of the
Bishops—Conferences Bounded—Bishops Consecrated
by Bishops Paine and McTyeire, Assisted by Elders
<pb id="phill16" n="16"/>
West, Bullard, Stewart, and Churchill—Petition from
Winchester, Ky.—Closing Remarks on the First General
Conference . . . . . <ref lang="phill41" targOrder="U">41</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER VI.<lb/>
The Church Organized—The Work Begun in Earnest—
Bishops Miles and Vanderhorst Holding District Conferences
—Isaac Lane, Presiding Elder Jackson District
—Letter of E. B. Martin to H. H. Hammel—Some Faithful
Preachers—First Episcopal Plan of Visitation—Dr.
Watson's Editorial—Bishop Vanderhorst and the Georgia
Conference—Some Personal Reminiscences—Estranged
Relation between C. M. E. and A. M. E. Churches—The
Cause—Bishops Miles and Vanderhorst Memorialize A.
M. E. General Conference—Their Letter—Bishop Vanderhorst
Dies—Remarks Concerning Him—Bishop Miles
Calls an Extra Session of the General Conference—L. J.
Scurlock Resigns the Assistant Editorship of the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi>
—E. B. Martin Succeeds Him—Letter from Wyatt Low
—Letter from Bishop Miles—Chapter Concluded . . . . . <ref target="phill48" targOrder="U">48</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER VII.<lb/>
The General Conference of 1873—J. W. Bell Elected Secretary
—Some Visitors from the M. E. Church, South—
Bishop Miles's Memorable Message—Its Reception—Referred
to the Various Committees—J. A. Beebe, L. H.
Holsey, and Isaac Lane Elected Bishops—Their Consecration
—Memorial Services to Bishop Vanderhorst—Some
Legislative Work—The Educational and Missionary
Work of the Church—Some Important Reports—The
General Missionary Board Appointed—The Annual Conferences
Assessed for the Support of the Bishops—A
Committee Eulogizes the Life, Labors, and Character of
Bishop Vanderhorst—E. B. Martin Makes a Report on
Publishing Interests—Afterwards Elected Editor and
Book Agent—Conference Adjourns . . . . . <ref target="phill56" targOrder="U">56</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER VIII.<lb/>
Fraternal Letter from the Bishops of the A. M. E. Church
—Editorial Comment by E. B. Martin—Death of Senior
Bishop William Paul Quinn, of the A. M. E. Church . . . . . <ref target="phill65" targOrder="U">65</ref></item>
              <item>
<pb id="phill17" n="17"/>
CHAPTER IX.<lb/>
The Bishops Holding Annual Conferences—Their Field
Not an Easy One—Some Epithets by which the Church
Was Called—Some Early Persecutions—Letters from the
Bishops—Chapter Concluded with an Interesting Letter
from R. T. White, of the Georgia Conference . . . . . <ref target="phill71" targOrder="U">71</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER X.<lb/>
The Church Spreading—Educational Enterprise Projected
—E. B. Martin Resigns His Office, and J. W. Bell Is Appointed
—Meeting of the Publishing Committee in Jackson
—Book Concern and <hi rend="italics">Index</hi> Moved to Louisville—J.
W. Bell Removed, and Alexander Austin Appointed
Editor in His Stead—<hi rend="italics">Index</hi> in New Dress—Letter from
Bishops Miles and Lane—Austin Removed—W. P.
Churchill Appointed—Circular Letter from the Bishops
—General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church,
South . . . . . <ref target="phill77" targOrder="U">77</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER XI.<lb/>
The Third General Conference—Able Message of the Bishops
—Conference Well Attended—Important Changes in
the Discipline—Publishing Committee—Bishops' Educational
Paper—Central University the Name of the School
Founded—Missions—Salary of the Bishops Fixed and
the Conferences Assessed—Conferences Bounded—Statistics
—Committee's Report on Fraternal Greetings—
Composition of the Committee—Its Powers—Some Who
Preached During the Conference—Adjournment . . . . . <ref target="phill86" targOrder="U">86</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER XII.<lb/>
The Bishops Working for the School at Louisville—R. T.
Thirgood Writes a Short Letter—Bishop Miles Visits
Boston, Mass.—Dr. Price Indorses His Work in <hi rend="italics">Zion's
Herald</hi>—A New Conference Organized—Bishops Miles
and Holsey Visit Round Lake (N. Y.) Camp Meeting—
Their Letters—How They Were Benefited—Bishop Miles
on Organic Union—Israel Church, at Washington, D. C.,
Withdraws from the A. M. E. Connection—The Cause—
E. B. Martin Expelled—The A. M. E. Zion General Conference
<pb id="phill18" n="18"/>
—Sentiments of W. P. Churchill on Organic Union
—The Louisville and Sardis School Enterprises—An
Appeal from Bishop Miles—The School Projects Fail—
The Causes—East Texas Conference—Some Prominent
Men in the Conferences—Letters from E. W. Moseley, D.
K. Sherman, and Bishop Holsey—General Conference of
1878 to Meet in Jackson, Tenn.—Church Seven Years
Old . . . . . <ref target="phill97" targOrder="U">97</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER XIII.<lb/>
The Fourth General Conference—Some Distinguished Visitors
—Work of the Conference—Its Close—Meeting of
the Book Committee—Some Important Matters Adjusted
—Death of John Lane—Tribute from Bishop Miles's
Daughter—Deaths of Crouch, Samuel, and Ridley—Remarks
about Fitzhugh, J. K. Daniel, Collins, and A. J.
Stinson—Struggles of the Book Committee—Letter from
Bishop Miles—The Bishops in Annual Meeting—Fraternal
Delegates Appointed to the Various Methodist Bodies
—Bishop Holsey Goes to Europe—Fitzhugh Joins the
African Methodist Episcopal Church—Thomas Appointed
Editor—Educational Matters—Letter from D. L. Jackson
—Lane College—Its Early History—First Catalogue—
First Graduates . . . . . <ref target="phill110" targOrder="U">110</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER XIV.<lb/>
Meeting of the Fifth General Conference—Some New Delegates
Elected—Death of G. W. Usher—Fraternal Messenger
from the M. E. Church, South—His Address—Replies
—Bishop Hillery's Address—Legislation of the General
Conference—General Officers Elected—<hi rend="italics">Index</hi> Removed
to Louisville—Other Distinguished Visitors—
Bishop Holsey's Visit to the General Conference of the
M. E. Church, South, as Fraternal Delegate—Our Educational
Enterprises—New Church Congregation Organized
at Washington, D. C.—Bishop Miles's Appeal in Its
Behalf—Pastors of Miles Memorial Church—Centennial
of Methodism Celebrated in Baltimore, Md.—Our Representatives
—A Word about R. S. Williams—Looking
toward the Next General Conference—It Meets, and Is
the Sixth General Conference—Some Legislative Enactments
<pb id="phill19" n="19"/>
—Fraternal Delegate to the General Conference of
the M. E. Church, South—General Officers and Book
Committee Elected—Bishop Miles's Protest—Silver
Watch Presented to Bishop Miles—His Reply—The Temperance
Question—Chapter Concluded . . . . . <ref n="124" target="phill124" targOrder="U">124</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER XV.<lb/>
Important Event in 1886—A Large Congregation Received
from the A. M. E. Church—Samuel B. Wallace the Leader—
General Conferences of Three Great Methodist Bodies
Meet in 1888—They Elect Bishops—First World's Sunday
School Convention—Some Discussions in the Church—
Meeting of the Seventh General Conference in Little
Rock, Ark.—Remarks on the Same—Some Important
Legislation—General Officers Elected—Delegates to the
Second Ecumenical Conference Chosen—Bishop Holsey's
Petition for a Supernumerary Relation Rejected—
Dr. J. C. Hartsell, Fraternal Delegate from the M. E.
Church, and Dr. M. G. Alexander, from the A. M. E.
Church, Make Addresses—Replies—E. W. Moseley, Fraternal
Delegate to the General Conference of the M. E.
Church, South—Greetings from Bishop Hood, of the A.
M. E. Zion Church—Bishop Beebe Replies—Greetings
from the M. E. Church, South—Bishop Miles's Failing
Health—Work of His Colleagues—Second Ecumenical
Conference Meets at Washington, D. C.—General Conferences
of Other Methodist Bodies—Elias Cottrell, R. T.
Brown, and R. S. Williams, Fraternal Delegates—The
Church Prosperous . . . . . <ref target="phill142" targOrder="U">142</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER XVI.<lb/>
Bishop Miles's Sickness—His Death—His Burial . . . . . <ref target="phill153" targOrder="U">153</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER XVII.<lb/>
Movements of the Church in 1893—The Agitation of More
Bishops after the Death of Bishop Miles—Remarks
about R. S. Williams and Elias Cottrell—Some Able Men
Mentioned—Meeting of the General Conference in Memphis,
Tenn.—Lay Delegates—Some New Clerical Delegates
—Bishops' Message—The Election of R. S. Williams
<pb id="phill20" n="20"/>
and Elias Cottrell to the Episcopal Office—The Church
No Lover of Politics—Some Measures Defeated—Financial
Plan—The Contingent Fund—Memorial Services in
Honor of Bishop Miles—Fraternal Delegates from the
M. E. Church, South, and the A. M. E. Church—Bishop
Lane a Fraternal Delegate to the M. E. Church, South—
An Opinion of the Bishops—Some Measures Passed—
Bishop Holsey Granted a Respite—Williams and Cottrell
Ordained—Book Agent and Editor Elected—Some Last
Acts of the Conference—Church Extension Society Abolished
 . . . . . <ref target="phill164" targOrder="U">164</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER XVIII.<lb/>
Opening of the Year 1895—The Church Celebrates Its
Twenty-fifth Anniversary—Resolution on the Celebration
Adopted by the General Conference of 1894—The
Celebration—“Despise Not the Day of Small Things”
—The Effect of the Celebration—Death of Samuel B.
Wallace—Funeral Services—Bishop Williams Officiates
—Other Ministers Present—His Body Interred—His
Birth—His Rapid Rise in the Ministry—General Remarks
Concerning His Useful Career—General Conferences
of Several Methodist Churches—Hart, Lane, and
Phillips, Fraternal Delegates—Three Methodist Bodies
Elect Bishops—The A. M. E. Zion Connection a Hundred
Years Old—Bishop Holsey Resumes Work—Revivals—
Lane College—A Publishing House Purchased—Looking
Forward to the General Conference of 1898—Bishops
Beebe, Holsey, and Lane . . . . . <ref target="phill178" targOrder="U">178</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER XIX.<lb/>
Pen Sketches of Bishops Miles, Vanderhorst, Beebe, Holsey,
Lane, Williams, and Cottrell . . . . . <ref target="phill196" targOrder="U">196</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER XX.<lb/>
OUR LITERATURE . . . . . <ref target="phill234" targOrder="U">234</ref></item>
              <item>
CHAPTER XXI.<lb/>
OUR FUTURE . . . . . <ref target="phill242" targOrder="U">242</ref></item>
            </list>
          </div1>
          <div1 type="illustrations">
            <pb id="phill21" n="21"/>
            <head>ILLUSTRATIONS.</head>
            <list type="simple">
              <item>C. H. PHILLIPS . . . . . <ref target="frontis1" targOrder="U">Frontispiece</ref></item>
              <item>THE PUBLISHING HOUSE . . . . . <ref target="ill1" targOrder="U">37</ref></item>
              <item>MORNING CHAPEL, FORT WORTH, TEX . . . . . <ref target="ill2" targOrder="U">69</ref></item>
              <item>ISRAEL METROPOLITAN CHURCH, WASHINGTON, D. C . . . . . <ref target="ill3" targOrder="U">103</ref></item>
              <item>COLLINS CHAPEL, MEMPHIS, TENN . . . . . <ref target="ill4" targOrder="U">117</ref></item>
              <item>MILES MEMORIAL TABERNACLE, WASHINGTON, D. C . . . . . <ref target="ill5" targOrder="U">133</ref></item>
              <item>LANE COLLEGE, JACKSON, TENN . . . . . <ref target="ill6" targOrder="U">147</ref></item>
              <item>HAYGOOD MEMORIAL HALL, PAINE INSTITUTE, AUGUSTA, GA . . . . . <ref target="ill7" targOrder="U">159</ref></item>
              <item>TRINITY CHURCH, AUGUSTA, GA . . . . . <ref target="ill8" targOrder="U">169</ref></item>
              <item>SYDNEY PARK CHURCH, COLUMBIA, S. C . . . . . <ref target="ill9" targOrder="U">179</ref></item>
              <item>JACKSON CHAPEL, ANNISTON, ALA . . . . . <ref target="ill10" targOrder="U">185</ref></item>
              <item>OUR MISSION CHURCH, HOT SPRINGS, ARK . . . . . <ref target="ill11" targOrder="U">193</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP MILES . . . . . <ref target="ill12" targOrder="U">199</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP BEEBE . . . . . <ref target="ill13" targOrder="U">209</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP HOLSEY . . . . . <ref target="ill14" targOrder="U">215</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP LANE . . . . . <ref target="ill15" targOrder="U">219</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP WILLIAMS . . . . . <ref target="ill16" targOrder="U">223</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP COTTRELL . . . . . <ref target="ill17" targOrder="U">229</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP C. H. PHILLIPS, D.D. . . . . . <ref target="frontis2" targOrder="U">250</ref></item>
              <item>LANE METROPOLITAN CHURCH, CLEVELAND, OHIO . . . . . <ref target="ill19" targOrder="U">517</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP G. <sic corr="W.">W</sic> STEWART, D.D. . . . . . <ref target="ill20" targOrder="U">565</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP R. A. CARTER, D.D. . . . . . <ref target="ill21" targOrder="U">567</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP N. C. CLEAVES, D.D. . . . . . <ref target="ill22" targOrder="U">569</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP R. T. BROWN, D.D. . . . . . <ref target="ill23" targOrder="U">571</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP J. A. HAMLETT, D.D. . . . . . <ref target="ill24" targOrder="U">575</ref></item>
              <item>BISHOP J. W. MCKINNEY, D.D. . . . . . <ref target="ill25" targOrder="U">577</ref></item>
            </list>
          </div1>
        </front>
        <body>
          <div1>
            <pb id="phill23" n="23"/>
            <head>HISTORY OF THE COLORED M. E. CHURCH.</head>
            <div2 type="chapter">
              <head>CHAPTER I.</head>
              <argument>
                <p>The General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church,
South—Important Question Asked and Answered—Religious
Oversight of the Slaves before the War—Some
White Preachers who Labored for their Spiritual Good—
M. E. Church, South, Takes Initiatory Steps Looking toward
the Organization of Its Colored Contingent into a
Separate Church.</p>
              </argument>
              <p>WHEN the General Conference of the Methodist
Episcopal Church, South, met in April, 1866, in the
city of New Orleans, this important question was
asked by that body: “What shall be done to promote
the religious interests of the colored people?” It
was indispensably necessary that such a query should
be raised. The war had just ended, and amid the
changes of fortune and the vicissitudes of time the relation
of slave to master had undergone a radical
change.</p>
              <p>When the war came on, the Methodist Episcopal
Church, South, had 207,000 colored communicants.
Their spiritual wants were administered to by faithful
and earnest ministers of the Southern Methodist
Church. Georgia and South Carolina alone had as
many as sixty ministers who served as missionaries to
the slaves.</p>
              <p>Bishop James Osgood Andrew, ninth bishop of the
<pb id="phill24" n="24"/>
Methodist Episcopal Church and second bishop of the
Methodist Episcopal Church, South, having become
connected with slavery by reason of a colored girl in
his possession bequeathed him by a lady, also by reason
of a boy belonging to his daughter, and other
legal slaves of his whom he secured to his second wife,
actually became unacceptable to many Northern Conferences,
and precipitated the occasion, if not the
cause, of the great split in Methodism in 1844. That
General Conference declared that “it is the sense of
this body that Bishop Andrew desist from the exercise
of his office so long as this impediment remains.”
Upon that resolution the North voted in the affirmative,
and the South in the negative. The inevitable
separation of this Church came; and in 1846, at the
General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal
Church, South, J. O. Andrew, who had been the
ninth bishop of the Methodist Episcopal Church, became
the second bishop of the Methodist Episcopal
Church, South, Bishop Joshua Soule being the first.
While Bishop Andrew owned slaves, and thus indirectly,
if not directly, gave a tacit assent to the perpetuation
of the “peculiar institution” of slavery,
which John Wesley declared to be “the sum of
all villainies,” yet he was a man of warm and tender
heart, and frequently rose to sublime heights
of eloquence when pleading for the religious instruction
of the slave. The services of Dr. Lovick
Pierce and James E. Evans; of Bishops George
Pierce, John C. Keener, and Rolland N. McTyeire
<pb id="phill25" n="25"/>
shall never be forgotten. They labored assiduously
for the Christian civilization of our race. In 1807
John Early, afterwards a bishop of the Methodist
Episcopal Church, South, was first sent to labor
among the slaves of Thomas Jefferson, in Bedford
County, Virginia; while Bishop William Capers'
monument erected over his grave bears the inscription:
“Founder of the Missions to the Slaves.” These
men simply followed in the wake of unselfish pioneers
who had preceded them.</p>
              <p>Thus the religious nature of the slave was developed;
thousands took on the civilization by which they
were environed, and thousands more cast their lot
with the Methodists. It was not unnatural that the
Southern Methodist Church should, after the war,
have shown a disposition to do what was best for her
colored contingent. Gradually this contingent was
either going into the African Methodist Episcopal
Church and African Methodist Episcopal Zion
Church or into the Methodist Episcopal Church.
Such were the persecution, misrepresentation, ridicule,
and stratagems brought to bear against the
Church, South, and especially its colored communicants,
that many were toled away; for, out of the
207,000 on the roll before the Civil War, only 78,000
were found at its close. To save this remnant was
the supreme thought of the leaders of the Church,
South. To organize them into an ecclesiastical body
occurred to them as the only feasible thing to be done.
Consequently when the General Conference in 1866
<pb id="phill26" n="26"/>
asked, “What shall be done to promote the religious
interests of the colored people?” that same body wisely
resolved that “when two or more Annual Conferences
shall be formed, let our bishops advise and assist
them in organizing a separate General Conference
jurisdiction for themselves, if they so desire and the
bishops deem it expedient, in accordance with the
doctrine and discipline of our Church, and bearing
the same relation to the General Conference as the
Annual Conferences bear to each other.” It was
found at the General Conference of the Church,
South, which met in Memphis in 1870, that five Annual
Conferences had been organized, whereupon the
bishops, in their message, inserted these words: “It
is our purpose, unless you otherwise order, to call a
General Conference to be holden next winter for the
purpose of organizing them into an entirely separate
Church, thus enabling them to become their own
guides and governors.”</p>
            </div2>
            <div2 type="chapter">
              <pb id="phill27" n="27"/>
              <head>CHAPTER II.</head>
              <argument>
                <p>The First General Conference—Bishop Paine, Senior Bishop
of the M. E. Church, South, Presiding—Revs. Green, Watson,
Taylor, and Others Present—Forming Committees—
Eight Conferences Represented, viz.: Memphis, Kentucky,
Arkansas, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi,
Alabama, and Texas—Remarks on W. H. Miles, R. H.
Vanderhorst, L. H. Holsey, Isaac Lane, I. H. Anderson,
and R. T. Thirgood.</p>
              </argument>
              <p>THE time appointed by the General Conference of
the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, at Memphis
in 1870, for holding the first General Conference of
its colored members was December 15, 1870. Rev.
A. L. P. Green, D.D., of Nashville, Tenn.; Rev.
Samuel Watson, D.D., of Memphis; and Rev. Thomas
Taylor, D.D., of Jackson, Tenn., were present, with
others, to assist in the organization, having been appointed
by the Southern Methodist General Conference
at its session in Memphis. Bishop Paine, of the
same Church, presided. After opening the Conference
with divine service, he made a few impressive
and appropriate remarks. Rev. James A. Heard,
pastor of the First Methodist Episcopal Church,
South, of Jackson, acted as Secretary pro tem. Upon
the request of Bishop Paine, Dr. Green read the
action of the General Conferences of 1866 and 1870
of his Church, so far as it related to the organization
of our Church. This done, our fathers then proceeded
to found a Church against which “the gates of hell
should never prevail.”</p>
              <pb id="phill28" n="28"/>
              <p>In May, 1870, we had five Annual Conferences;
but at the organization of the General Conference in
December, these had increased to eight. The list of
delegates from the several Annual Conferences was
called and those present answered to their names.
These were the Conferences and persons who represented
them:</p>
              <p>MEMPHIS CONFERENCE.—<hi rend="italics">Clerical:</hi> Isaac Lane,
John W. Lane, T. N. Stewart, Benjamin Bullard, Job
Crouch, Silas Phillips, and Beverly Ford. <hi rend="italics">Reserves:</hi>
J. Merriwether, S. B. Stinson, and, C. Henning. <hi rend="italics">Lay
Delegates:</hi> Augustus Bostic, Little John Scurlock,
Berry Hill, Charles McTyeire, Samuel Craighead,
Moses Harding, and R. Shields. <hi rend="italics">Reserves:</hi> John
Tuggle, R. Goodloe, and Isaac Blair.</p>
              <p>MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE.—<hi rend="italics">Clerical:</hi> R. Polk and
Frank Funchess. <hi rend="italics">Reserves:</hi> John Dorsey and Frank
Ambrose. <hi rend="italics">Lay Delegates:</hi> M. Mitchell and Nat.
Harris. <hi rend="italics">Reserves:</hi> P. Barnes and William Jones.</p>
              <p>ALABAMA CONFERENCE.—<hi rend="italics">Clerical:</hi> Anderson
Jackson, Moses Pringle, Ezekiel Reynolds, Robert
Thirgood, and A. Hawkins. <hi rend="italics">Lay Delegate:</hi> J. Brockman.</p>
              <p>GEORGIA CONFERENCE.—<hi rend="italics">Clerical:</hi> Richard H.
Vanderhorst, Isaac H. Anderson, Edward West, and
Lucius H. Holsey. <hi rend="italics">Lay Delegates:</hi> Solomon Garrett,
F. Ford, Green Saltmarsh, and William Chesnut.</p>
              <p>KENTUCKY CONFERENCE.—<hi rend="italics">Clerical:</hi> Barnett S.
Newton, R. Marshall, and W. P. Churchill. 
<pb id="phill29" n="29"/>
<hi rend="italics">Reserve:</hi> W. H. Miles. <hi rend="italics">Lay Delegates:</hi> James Graves
and William Watson.</p>
              <p>ARKANSAS CONFERENCE.—<hi rend="italics">Clerical:</hi> R. Samuels
and Solon Graham. <hi rend="italics">Reserve:</hi> Boston Welborn.
<hi rend="italics">Lay Delegate:</hi> Isaac Simpson.</p>
              <p>SOUTH CAROLINA CONFERENCE.—<hi rend="italics">Clerical:</hi> R. Valentine
and Richard Moses.</p>
              <p>TEXAS CONFERENCE.—<hi rend="italics">Clerical:</hi> William Taylor.</p>
              <p>A majority of all the delegates elected being present,
the Conference effected a permanent organization,
with James A. Heard, Secretary, and L. J. Scurlock,
Assistant Secretary. The rules of order as contained
in the “Manual of Discipline” of the Methodist
Episcopal Church, South, were adopted for the
government of the Conference; the bar was fixed on
an imaginary line across the room from the side of the
window nearest the pulpit; and the hours of meeting
and adjournment were fixed at 9 A.M. and 12:30
P.M. Thus cautiously, systematically, and prayerfully
the framers of our Church institution proceeded
in the great work which devolved upon them.</p>
              <p>By motion, the Committees on Organization, Episcopacy,
Discipline, Books and Periodicals, Itinerancy,
and Boundaries were composed of one member from
each Annual Conference. They were as follows:</p>
              <p>ORGANIZATION.—<hi rend="italics">Memphis Conference</hi>, Benjamin
Bullard; <hi rend="italics">Kentucky Conference</hi>, Barnett S. Newton;
<hi rend="italics">Mississippi Conference</hi>, Frank Ambrose; <hi rend="italics">Alabama
Conference</hi>, Anderson Jackson; <hi rend="italics">Arkansas Conference</hi>,
Richard Samuels; <hi rend="italics">Georgia Conference</hi>, Isaac
<pb id="phill30" n="30"/>
H. Anderson; <hi rend="italics">South Carolina Conference</hi>, Richard
Moses.</p>
              <p>Episcopacy.—<hi rend="italics">Memphis Conference</hi>, Augustus
Bostic; <hi rend="italics">Kentucky Conference</hi>, R. Marshall; <hi rend="italics">Mississippi
Conference</hi>, William Jones; <hi rend="italics">Alabama Conference</hi>,
E. Reynolds; <hi rend="italics">Arkansas Conference</hi>, Richard
Samuels; <hi rend="italics">Georgia Conference</hi>, R. H. Vanderhorst;
<hi rend="italics">South Carolina Conference</hi>, Richard Valentine.</p>
              <p>THE DISCIPLINE.—<hi rend="italics">Memphis Conference</hi>, J. W.
Lane; <hi rend="italics">Kentucky Conference</hi>, B. S. Newton; <hi rend="italics">Mississippi
Conference</hi>, Nat. Harris; <hi rend="italics">Alabama Conference</hi>,
R. T. Thirgood; <hi rend="italics">Arkansas Conference</hi>, Isaac
Simpson; <hi rend="italics">Georgia Conference</hi>, L. H. Holsey; <hi rend="italics">South
Carolina Conference</hi>, Richard Moses.</p>
              <p>BOOKS AND PERIODICALS.—<hi rend="italics">Memphis Conference</hi>,
Isaac Lane; <hi rend="italics">Kentucky Conference</hi>, James Graves;
<hi rend="italics">Mississippi Conference</hi>, F. Ambrose; <hi rend="italics">Alabama Conference</hi>,
A. G. Hawkins; <hi rend="italics">Georgia Conference</hi>, R. H.
Vanderhorst; <hi rend="italics">South Carolina Conference</hi>, R. Valentine;
<hi rend="italics">Arkansas Conference</hi>, J. Simpson.</p>
              <p>ITINERANCY.—<hi rend="italics">Memphis Conference</hi>,—Isaac Lane;
<hi rend="italics">Kentucky Conference</hi>, W. Watson; <hi rend="italics">Mississippi Conference</hi>,
F. Funchess; <hi rend="italics">Alabama Conference</hi>, A. Jackson;
<hi rend="italics">Georgia Conference</hi>, Edward West; <hi rend="italics">Arkansas
Conference</hi>, R. Samuels.</p>
              <p>BOUNDARIES.—<hi rend="italics">Memphis Conference</hi>, T. N. Stewart;
<hi rend="italics">Kentucky Conference</hi>, B. Ball; <hi rend="italics">Arkansas Conference</hi>,
J. Simpson; <hi rend="italics">Mississippi Conference</hi>, F. Ambrose;
<hi rend="italics">Georgia Conference</hi>, G. D. Flannagan; <hi rend="italics">South
Carolina Conference</hi>, R. Valentine; <hi rend="italics">Alabama Conference</hi>,
Robert T. Thirgood.</p>
              <pb id="phill31" n="31"/>
              <p>SUNDAY SCHOOLS.—T. N. Stewart, L. H. Holsey,
W. P. Churchill.</p>
              <p>FINANCE.—P. Bell, L. J. Scurlock, Silas Phillips.</p>
              <p>PUBLIC WORSHIP.—Isaac Lane, Jordan Merriwether,
Charles Lea, Job Crouch.</p>
              <p>The men that composed this General Conference
and formed these committees were the pioneers of our
Methodism. The work they accomplished has stood
the test of more than twenty-five years. It was clear,
simple, and permanent. The moral temper of the
Conference was in striking contrast to political conventions,
where inordinate ambition, self-aggrandizement,
and unholy rivalry mar the proceedings and too
often thwart the plans of patriotic men looking to the
best interests of the people. Truth, and an unselfish
love for the general welfare of the Church, illuminated
their thoughts and seemed to direct their way to
wise conclusions. Dr. Samuel Watson, who attended
the meeting of this body from start to finish, and who,
before its close, was requested to edit the <hi rend="italics">Christian
Index</hi>, made these complimentary and terse remarks
about the Conference:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>It was a most interesting occasion. Delegates from eight
Annual Conferences were in attendance. They came from
South Carolina to Texas, on the south and west, and Kentucky,
on the north. I have never seen a more harmonious
Conference of any kind. There was a good degree of intelligence
among its members. A distinguished judge, who
attended the Conference daily, said it would compare favorably
with the Tennessee Legislature.</p>
              </q>
              <p>Such views of the character and ability of the men
<pb id="phill32" n="32"/>
that were with the Church in its formation are not
overdrawn.</p>
              <p>Some who were prominent in that Conference, and
helped to give tone and dignity to it, as well as shape
the destiny of the newborn Church, have largely
shaped its policy ever since. In no one General Conference
has the Church found so much bishop timber
and so many men possessing such admirable elements
of leadership as those that constituted our first General
Conference. William Henry Miles, a reserve delegate
from the Kentucky Conference, and Richard H.
Vanderhorst, a regular delegate from the Georgia
Conference, were, on December 21, the fifth day of
the session, elected the first bishops of our Church;
but they were not all the bishop timber in this Conference.
There was a young man from Sparta, Ga.,
about the age of twenty-nine or thirty, who, unconscious
to himself, exhibited to others possibilities and
a life of great usefulness to his Church. Allusion is
here made of Lucius H. Holsey. Quick of apprehension,
apt in instruction, brilliant, brainy, gifted, and
endowed by nature with an intellect destined to expand
and develop, this body saw in him a future
bishop, and at a subsequent General Conference he
was elected and consecrated to the episcopal office.
Isaac Lane, L. H. Holsey's senior by five or six years,
also a leader in 1870, was afterwards elected a bishop.
Time has verified the wisdom of the body that elected
them. Mention should be made also of Isaac H. Anderson,
who has maintained his hold upon the Church
<pb id="phill33" n="33"/>
ever since its organization. He has been a member
of every General Conference, except the one of 1874,
and has just rounded out eight years as Book Agent
and manager of the <hi rend="italics">Christian Index.</hi></p>
              <p>Of the preachers who composed our first General
Conference, I. H. Anderson, now of the North Mississippi
Conference, and R. T. Thirgood, of the North
Alabama Conference, are the only ones, Bishops Holsey
and Lane excepted, who are in the itinerant service
of the Church. Not ten of the clerical delegates
are living, not eight of the laymen, who saw the old
Colored Methodist Episcopal ship launched, with
flag and pennant streaming wide, a quarter of a century
ago. They have passed over to that bourne
from whence there can be no returning.</p>
              <lg type="verse">
                <l>What is life? A transient bubble,</l>
                <l>Like the <foreign lang="lat">ignis fatuus'</foreign> gleam—</l>
                <l>Full of crosses, full of trouble,</l>
                <l>Passing like a fevered dream.</l>
              </lg>
            </div2>
            <div2 type="chapter">
              <pb id="phill34" n="34"/>
              <head>CHAPTER III.</head>
              <argument>
                <p>First General Conference—Report of the Committee on
Church Organization—The New Church Named.</p>
              </argument>
              <p>THE report of no committee was looked forward to
with more eagerness, solicitude, and interest than the
Committee on Church Organization. I. H. Anderson,
the Chairman, in submitting his report, gratefully
acknowledged the obligations of his brethren to
the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, for what they
had done for them; believing, however, that the time
had come when, for the glory of God and the best
interest of both races, they should have a distinct and
independent organization, provision for the same
having been made, as we have already seen. This
report was preceded by a touching and forcible address
by Bishop Paine upon the present and future
relations of the Church, South, to the Church about
to be organized. He urged upon the Conference the
<hi rend="italics"><foreign lang="lat">sine qua non</foreign></hi> of a pure ministry and the great importance
of a spiritual membership. There was absolutely
no difficulty in giving a name to the new
Church institution. The eight members of that committee,
representing eight Annual Conferences, were
of one mind, soul, and spirit. Their knowledge of
early Methodism enabled them to select a name that
would be closely related to the one by which the followers
of John Wesley were first known in this country.
This was the report of the committee:</p>
              <pb id="phill35" n="35"/>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>Whereas the Methodist Episcopal Church in America
was the name first given to the Methodist Church in the
United States; and</p>
                <p>Whereas we are a part of that same Church, never having
seceded or separated from the Church; but in the division
of the Church by the General Conference in 1844 we
naturally belonged to the South, and have been in that division
ever since; and now, as we belong to the colored
race, we simply prefix the word “colored” to the name,
and for ourselves adopt the name, as we are in fact a part
of the original Church, as old as any in America; therefore
be it</p>
                <p>Resolved, 1. That our name be the “Colored Methodist
Episcopal Church in America.”</p>
                <p>2. That while we thus claim for ourselves an antiquity
running as far back as any branch of the Methodist family
on this side of the Atlantic Ocean, and while we claim
for ourselves all that we concede to others of ecclesiastical
and civil rights, we shall ever hold in grateful remembrance
what the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, has
done for us; we shall ever cherish the kindliest feelings toward
the bishops and General Conference for giving to us
all that they enjoy of religious privileges, the ordination
of our deacons and elders; and at this Conference our bishops
will be ordained by them to the highest office known
in our Church. No other church organization has thus
been established in the land. We most sincerely pray, earnestly
desire, and confidently believe that there will ever
be the kindliest feelings cherished toward the Methodist
Episcopal Church, South, and that we may ever receive
their warmest sympathy and support.</p>
                <p>3. That we request the bishops to organize our General
Conference on the basis of the Discipline of the Methodist
Episcopal Church, South, in its entire doctrine, discipline,
and economy, making only such verbal alterations and
changes as may be necessary to conform it to our name and
the peculiarities of our condition.</p>
              </q>
              <p>Along the lines mentioned in this chapter the
<pb id="phill36" n="36"/>
Church was established and named, and at no time
since has there been a general desire to change its
name or modify or alter the basis upon which it was
founded. While there has been no great desire to
change the name, there has been a desire to see the
phrase, “in America,” dropped; and this can, and
doubtless will, be done in the future, without any injury
to the name of the Church.</p>
            </div2>
            <pb id="phill37" n="37"/>
            <div2 type="illustration">
              <p>
                <figure id="ill1" entity="phill037">
                  <p>THE PUBLISHING HOUSE, JACKSON, TENN.</p>
                </figure>
              </p>
            </div2>
            <div2 type="chapter">
              <pb id="phill39" n="39"/>
              <head>CHAPTER IV.</head>
              <argument>
                <p>First General Conference—A Publishing House Founded—
An Official Organ Created.</p>
              </argument>
              <p>MEASURES looking forward to the creation of a Publishing
House were adopted at the third day's session,
or December 19, 1870. I. H. Anderson moved
that the Publishing House be located in Memphis,
Tenn. The motion was first laid on the table, but
afterwards taken therefrom and adopted. From the
very beginning it became apparent to these framers of
the Church that a Publishing House, where the literature
of the Church should be created and deposited,
was an indispensable necessity. L. H. Holsey, a
young man of promise and ability, after showing the
need of a Publishing House, offered the following,
which was adopted:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>Resolved, 1. That we have a Book Agent.</p>
                <p>2. That we empower the associate editor to act as Book
Agent.</p>
                <p>3. That we require the Book Agent and Editor, with the
assistance of the preachers and presiding elders, to get as
many members and other friends as possible to subscribe
five dollars or more for the future establishment of said
Publishing House.</p>
                <p>4. That said subscriptions or donations shall be forwarded
to the Publishing Committee, who shall constitute
the managers of said fund for said purpose under the supervision
of Dr. Samuel Watson.</p>
              </q>
              <p>Thus were our publishing interests founded, which
<pb id="phill40" n="40"/>
have undergone some change at each recurring General
Conference.</p>
              <p>For two years before the Colored Methodist Episcopal
Church had assumed tangible form, a paper
known as the <hi rend="italics">Christian Index</hi> had been published in
its interest by Samuel Watson, D.D., of the Church,
South. This Conference resolved that it should continue
to be published, with Dr. Watson as editor, and
that the office of Assistant Editor should be created.
A cash system was adopted, and it was resolved that
each preacher should procure ten subscribers for the
paper, and that in no case should a paper be sent unless
the cash accompanied the subscription. No General
Conference since has been able to make any
improvement on this cash system.</p>
              <p>The Publishing Committee was to be composed of
the Presiding Elder of the Memphis District, the stationed
preacher at Collins Chapel, and Augustus Bostic,
a prominent layman of the same church. It was
further decided that, at the General Conference
which was to meet in Augusta, Ga., the first Wednesday
in July, 1874, the Publishing Committee should
make a full statement of all moneys received and expended
during the quadrennium.</p>
              <p>Our readers can clearly see that the legislation of
this first General Conference reflects credit upon the
men of that day. Their work has been permanent;
their record is written on high. They have bequeathed
to us a glorious history, a history that shall
shine with increasing luster as the years roll by.</p>
            </div2>
            <div2 type="chapter">
              <pb id="phill41" n="41"/>
              <head>CHAPTER V.</head>
              <argument>
                <p>First General Conference Concluded—Report of Committee
on Episcopacy—The Election of two Bishops Recommended
—B. S. Newton and L. H. Holsey Appointed Tellers
—Divine Guidance Sought in the Election—W. H.
Miles and R. H. Vanderhorst Chosen Bishops—L. J. Scurlock
Elected Book Agent—Fixing Salaries of the Bishops
—Conferences Bounded—Bishops Consecrated by Bishops
Paine and McTyeire, Assisted by Elders West, Bullard,
Stewart, and Churchill—Petition from Winchester, Ky.
—Closing Remarks on the First General Conference.</p>
              </argument>
              <p>THE Committee on Episcopacy, of which Augustus
Bostic was Chairman, on December 21, 1870, recommended
the election and consecration of two men to
the episcopal office. The report was adopted; but before
the election the Conference sought Divine guidance
and aid in the selection of the men who were to
be the first bishops of the Colored Methodist Episcopal
Church. Our forefathers did not resort to wire-pulling,
political jugglery, and hypocritical demagogy
in order to elect the men; neither did they indulge
in misrepresentations to blight the possibilities
of any man; they relied upon the guidance of
the Holy Spirit. Like the apostles, when they were
filling the place of Judas, who, by transgression, fell,
they prayed: “Lord, thou knowest the hearts of all
men: show which two men among us thou hast chosen,
that they may take the lead of our ministry and this
Church which under thy providence has just been
<pb id="phill42" n="42"/>
founded.” After such a season of prayer and devotion
to God, it was not likely that they should err in
their selection.</p>
              <p>L. H. Holsey, of Georgia, and B. S. Newton, of
Kentucky, were appointed tellers. The balloting began,
and ended with the following result:</p>
              <p>First ballot (votes cast, 40; necessary to a choice,
21)—W. H. Miles, 27; R. H. Vanderhorst, 16; Job
Crouch, 12; W. P. Churchill, 9; T. N. Stewart, 8; B.
S. Newton, 2; R. Marshall, 2.</p>
              <p>William H. Miles, of Kentucky, having received a
majority of votes cast, was declared, by Bishop McTyeire,
duly elected Bishop of the Colored Methodist
Episcopal Church in America.</p>
              <p>Second ballot (votes cast, 40; necessary to a choice,
21)—R. H. Vanderhorst, 20; Job Crouch, 15; W. P.
Stewart, 7; W. P. Churchill, 3. No election.</p>
              <p>Third ballot (votes cast, 40; necessary to a choice,
21)—R. H. Vanderhorst, 26; Job Crouch, 12; W. P.
Churchill, 2.</p>
              <p>Richard H. Vanderhorst having received a majority
of all votes cast, Bishop McTyeire declared him
duly elected.</p>
              <p>The election of bishops over, the Conference, on the
third ballot, elected L. J. Scurlock Book Agent, L. H.
Holsey running him closely.</p>
              <p>Consequently W. H. Miles and R. H. Vanderhorst
became our first Bishops, and L. J. Scurlock our first
Book Agent.</p>
              <p>It is a little interesting to see how the Committee
<pb id="phill43" n="43"/>
on Episcopacy fixed the salaries of the bishops. Bishop
Miles was to receive a salary of $1,000 per year, and
Bishop Vanderhorst, $700 per year. Each Annual
Conference was to pay the bill of traveling expenses
that should be submitted by the bishop as having
been incurred by him in the discharge of the business
or duties of the Conference visited—in other words,
they were to receive the salaries already stated and
their traveling expenses.</p>
              <p>We have seen that eight Conferences were represented
at the opening of the General Conference;
but before its close the Virginia and Tennessee Conferences
were formed, making ten in all. The Committee
on Boundaries fixed the territory of these Conferences
as described below:</p>
              <list type="simple">
                <item>1. The Memphis Conference embraces that part of Tennessee
south of the Tennessee River, and North Mississippi.</item>
                <item>
2. The Tennessee Conference embraces that part of the
State of Tennessee north of the Tennessee River, and North
Alabama.</item>
                <item>
3. The Kentucky Conference embraces the State of Kentucky.</item>
                <item>
4. The Virginia Conference embraces the State of Virginia.</item>
                <item>
5. The Arkansas Conference embraces the State of Arkansas.</item>
                <item>
6. The Texas Conference embraces East Texas.</item>
                <item>
7. The Georgia Conference embraces the States of Georgia
and Florida.</item>
                <item>
8. The Alabama Conference embraces the State of Alabama
except that part included in the Tennessee Conference.</item>
                <item>
9. The Mississippi Conference embraces the State of Mississippi
except that part included in the Memphis Conference.</item>
                <item>
<pb id="phill44" n="44"/>
10. The South Carolina Conference embraces the State
of South Carolina.</item>
              </list>
              <p>To raise the $1,700 which had been appropriated
for the bishops' salaries, the following assessments
were made:</p>
              <list type="simple">
                <item>Memphis Conference . . . . . $225 00</item>
                <item>Virginia Conference . . . . . 150 00</item>
                <item>Arkansas Conference . . . . . 100 00</item>
                <item>Texas Conference . . . . . 210 00</item>
                <item>Georgia Conference . . . . . 225 00</item>
                <item>Alabama Conference . . . . . 220 00</item>
                <item>Mississippi Conference . . . . . 220 00</item>
                <item>South Carolina Conference . . . . . 125 00</item>
                <item>Kentucky Conference . . . . . 225 00</item>
                <item>
Total . . . . . $1,700 00</item>
              </list>
              <p>As small as these assessments were, they were not
all collected, and the result was the bishops were not
paid in full. They did not fail to travel, however;
for they labored unceasingly to spread the Church
and add souls to her number.</p>
              <p>On the night of the same day of their election, in
the First Methodist Episcopal Church, South, they
were consecrated to their high office by Bishops Paine
and McTyeire. Edward West and Benjamin Bullard
presented W. H. Miles, and T. N. Stewart and W. P.
Churchill presented R. H. Vanderhorst, and assisted
the bishops in the ordination exercises. Those who
were present and are still living will not forget the
solemnity of the occasion. Bishop Paine resigned
the chair to Bishop Miles as soon as the ordination
was over, and he, after presiding for awhile, resigned
in favor of Bishop Vanderhorst. Thus was the machinery
<pb id="phill45" n="45"/>
turned over to our bishops, and by them it has
been manned ever since.</p>
              <p>Before concluding this write-up of the first General
Conference, we desire to show our readers how the
hearts and minds of the people were turned toward
Jackson, Tenn., when representatives from all parts
of the country had gathered there to form the new
Church. Among the petitions that were presented
none were more important, none indicated more clearly
the trend in which legislation should be directed,
none looked forward with more favorable apprehension,
showing more palpably the interest that was
coeval with the followers of this Church, than the
petition that was presented by W. H. Miles, from
Winchester, Ky. It was dated November 25, 1870,
and read thus:</p>
              <q type="petition" direct="unspecified">
                <text>
                  <body>
                    <div1 type="petition">
                      <opener>
                        <salute>
                          <hi rend="italics">To the Colored General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal
Church, South:</hi>
                        </salute>
                      </opener>
                      <p>“Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the
Lord Jesus Christ.”</p>
                      <p>We thank our God, through Jesus Christ, for you all,
that our Church is widening its sphere of usefulness, and is
gathering into its fold true and penitent believers; for we
desire nothing so much as the spreading of the gospel of
Christ. May your deliberations be guided by wisdom from
on high; and, in your instituting a new order of things in
our Church, our daily prayer shall be: “May the Lord direct
you.” If it be the will of God, our desire is that colored
bishops be appointed or elected to take charge of and
preside over the colored Church. It is our desire that our
organization be known under the name of the “Methodist
Episcopal Church”—not that we wish to sever our connection
with the “Methodist Episcopal Church, South;” not
that we want to unite with the “Methodist Episcopal
<pb id="phill46" n="46"/>
Church, North;” but as our Savior called us to come unto
him, let us imitate his goodness and purity, and in name
avoid all stumbling-blocks, and, looking heavenward, move
on triumphantly to the prize of the high calling in Christ
Jesus. Some of the churches in Central Kentucky have
engendered some bitterness of feeling on this account; and
this slight change would produce harmony and unity of
action that would render us invincible against the hosts of
this world, and perhaps would be the means of saving
many a wearied and lost soul.</p>
                      <p>We trust that you will listen to our prayers, and accept
this graciously from your brethren in Christ at Allen's
Chapel, main cross street, Winchester, Ky.</p>
                      <p>Signed by the Church through us as its officers: John
Allen, Thomas Webb, Richard Trotter, Harrison Martin,
Jacob Carey, Stewards; James Austin, Class Leader; Edward
Massie, George Gardner, Sheet Irvin, Trustees; Reuben
Taylor, Pastor Dry Fork Station; Moses Hall, Pastor
Owingsville Station; Stephen Brown, Pastor Mount Sterling
Station; and Richard Wells, Pastor Red River Circuit.</p>
                    </div1>
                  </body>
                </text>
              </q>
              <p>These petitioners were earnest; they plainly saw
that if the colored contingent of the Church, South,
were to have a future, then they must assume a new
relation to that Church.</p>
              <p>Our first General Conference was the most important
one yet held. It had conditions, and not theories,
to confront. It had to shape and outline the
policy of the new organization; define its relation to
the Church that gave it birth; resolve to abstain, as a
Church, from participation in politics, and know
nothing among men, save Christ, and him crucified.
Having no Discipline of its own, the Conference
adopted the Discipline of the Methodist Episcopal
Church, South, taking out and putting in such things
as would be for the highest interest of the Church. It
<pb id="phill47" n="47"/>
also decided to patronize the Sunday school literature
of the Church, South, both in books and periodicals.</p>
              <p>Legal and constitutional in organization, legitimately
descended from the very father of Methodism,
clear and spotless in its record, firm and unwavering
in the doctrines and principles of Methodism, the
Colored Methodist Episcopal Church entered upon
its career clear as the sun, bright as the moon, and
terrible as an army with banners.</p>
            </div2>
            <div2 type="chapter">
              <pb id="phill48" n="48"/>
              <head>CHAPTER VI.</head>
              <argument>
                <p>The Church Organized—The Work Begun in Earnest—Bishops
Miles and Vanderhorst Holding District Conferences
—Isaac Lane, Presiding Elder Jackson District—Letter of
E. B. Martin to H. H. Hammel—Some Faithful Preachers
—First Episcopal Plan of Visitation—Dr. Watson's Editorial
—Bishop Vanderhorst and the Georgia Conference—
Some Personal Reminiscences—Estranged Relation Between
C. M. E. and A. M. E. Churches—The Cause—Bishops
Miles and Vanderhorst Memorialize A. M. E. General
Conference—Their Letter—Bishop Vanderhorst Dies
—Remarks Concerning Him—Bishop Miles Calls an Extra
Session of the General Conference—L. J. Scurlock
Resigns the Assistant Editorship of the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi>—E. B. Martin
Succeeds Him—Letter from Wyatt Low—Letter from
Bishop Miles—Chapter Concluded.</p>
              </argument>
              <p>THE Church organized, bishops elected, and the line
of policy outlined, the ministers of the new Church
began at once to spread and extend its borders. Bishops
Miles and Vanderhorst traveled extensively,
building up circuits, missions, and stations, and taking
back members who had been toled into other denominations
by misrepresentation of the relation of our
Church to the Church, South.</p>
              <p>In the summer of 1871, Bishop Miles held District
Conferences in Tennessee, Mississippi, Kentucky, and
other States; and Bishop Vanderhorst was engaged
in the same kind of work in South Carolina, Georgia,
and Florida. Faithful men in all parts of the Church
were laboring for her expansion.</p>
              <p>This year we find Isaac Lane presiding elder of the
<pb id="phill49" n="49"/>
Jackson District, and E. B. Martin at Palona, Miss.
Writing to H. H. Hammel, of Nashville, Tenn., the
latter says:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>I have a great deal to do; I have not had any money
since April; I have eight places to preach at on this circuit.
I am in the wilderness; I never hear a car whistle, only
when I ride twelve or thirteen miles to the little station
where the post office is. But I am the servant of God; and if
the Lord says stay here, I will stay and do the best I can.
I believe God blesses my labors, for the Church here was
nearly all gone to the Baptists. I called them, and they
came back to the fold again. I had a great meeting and
baptizing the first Sunday in the month. God takes care
of me. I say sometimes, like good old David: “The Lord
is my shepherd; I shall not want.”</p>
              </q>
              <p>The above letter was dated Palona, June 17, 1871.</p>
              <p>E. B. Martin was afterwards pastor of Collins
Chapel, Book Agent, editor of the <hi rend="italics">Christian Index</hi>,
and pastor at Louisville, Ky., where he finally deserted
the Church; and after becoming for a few
years the pastor of a congregation which he drew out
from Center Street Church, he connected himself with
the Baptist denomination.</p>
              <p>In the various Conferences were to be found zealous
men who considered no sacrifice too great for them
to make for the good of the cause which they represented.
L. H. Holsey, I. H. Anderson, and Edward
West, in Georgia; B. S. Newton, R. Marshall, W. P.
Churchill, and J. W. Bell, in Kentucky; J. A. Beebe,
a coming young man in North Carolina—all these
were fruitful in labors.</p>
              <p>The District Conferences held by the two bishops
were interesting and usually well attended. Several
<pb id="phill50" n="50"/>
Conferences were organized, and the degree of enthusiasm
was such that the young daughter of Methodism
was fast making her place among other Christian
bodies.</p>
              <p>The first plan of episcopal visitation appeared in
the <hi rend="italics">Christian Index</hi> of July, 1871. Here it is:</p>
              <list rend="italics" type="simple">
                <item><hi rend="italics">Conference.</hi> . . . . .  <hi rend="italics">Place.</hi> . . . . .  <hi rend="italics">Time.</hi></item>
                <item>Kentucky . . . . . Glasgow . . . . . Aug. 20.</item>
                <item>Tennessee . . . . . Clarksville . . . . . Sept. 6.</item>
                <item>Arkansas . . . . . El Dorado . . . . . Sept. 20.</item>
                <item>Texas . . . . . Marshall . . . . . Oct. 11.</item>
                <item>Memphis . . . . . Memphis . . . . . Nov. 8.</item>
                <item>Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . Nov. 22.</item>
                <item>Alabama . . . . . Auburn . . . . . Dec. 6.</item>
                <item>Georgia . . . . . Milledgeville . . . . . Dec. 13.</item>
                <item>South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . Dec. 20.</item>
              </list>
              <p>In making out the above plan, the bishops evidently
intended to accompany each other, for Dr.
Watson, the editor of the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi>, made this explanation:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>Bishops Miles and Vanderhorst will visit and hold these
Conferences together, wherever practicable. This was the
ancient style of Bishops Coke and Asbury. Thus our bishops
will have an opportunity to get acquainted with the
churches, and the churches with them.</p>
              </q>
              <p>Bishop Vanderhorst held the Georgia Conference,
which met in December, in Milledgeville. The writer
was only thirteen years old, but he remembers that
the Bishop preached a great sermon from 2 Pet. i.
10: “Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence
to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do
these things, ye shall never fall.” We do not remember
the outlines—it is enough, young as we were—to
remember the text—but we do recollect that his sermon
<pb id="phill51" n="51"/>
was eloquent, powerful, and pathetic, and made
a great impression upon the people. The intonation
of his voice, his graceful gestures, his beautiful cadences,
his anxious look, his elegant diction, and his
native eloquence marked him an orator of the purest
type. He was a tall, erect, dignified black man. Dr.
Watson, when describing the two bishops at one time,
said: “Bishop Miles is <hi rend="italics">bright</hi>, but Bishop Vanderhorst,
as a Kentucky brother said in the General Conference,
is <hi rend="italics">black</hi> enough for any of us.” These men
of God, undaunted by persecution—for this they did
not escape—pressed forward in protecting the rights
and defending Colored Methodism from the attacks
of her enemies.</p>
              <p>In these days there arose an estranged relation between
the African Methodist Episcopal Church and
the Colored Methodist Episcopal Church, by reason
of the former Church occupying property belonging
to the latter, to which, by the action of the Methodist
Episcopal Church, South, it was justly entitled.
In the ante-bellum days the colored Methodists of the
South held their membership in the Methodist Episcopal
Church, South; nor was said membership held
by choice, but by necessity; they could not do otherwise.
They were not allowed to form organizations
among themselves, as they had done in the North.
Hence when the African Methodist Episcopal Church
made the attempt to gather them together, that
Church was driven out as an Ishmael; but when the
war had knocked off the shackles from the slaves,
“Bethel” again came upon the scene and gathered
<pb id="phill52" n="52"/>
many under her banner. This was not all; churches
that belonged to the Colored Methodist Episcopal Connection,
which had been turned over to it by the
Church, South, the African Methodist Episcopal
Church held for its own use, and many were never
recovered. The General Conference of the African
Methodist Episcopal Church met in Nashville, Tenn.,
in May, 1872, and to this body Bishops Miles and
Vanderhorst addressed a memorial letter. It was
dated Memphis, Tenn., May 1, 1872. This memorial
is in point here, as it will show that our Church
had ample reasons for complaint. The letter is published
in full:</p>
              <q type="letter" direct="unspecified">
                <text>
                  <body>
                    <div1 type="letter">
                      <opener>
                        <salute>
                          <hi rend="italics">To Your Honorable Body, Hoping God's Blessing May Attend
You, and That You May Have a Pleasant Session—Greeting:</hi>
                        </salute>
                      </opener>
                      <p>DEAR BRETHREN AND SIRS: This being the first session
of your General Conference since we have effected our separate
organization, we desire to live in peace with all men,
and especially with Christians. So we concluded to drop
your honorable body a few lines, asking you to take some
steps to settle the difficulty that now exists between our
Churches with regard to our church property which your
congregations are now occupying without any legal right
by the decision of the General Conference at Memphis,
Tenn., in 1870. We assure you that we wish to live in peace
with your Church, and do not wish to go to law for our
churches. If it pleases your honorable body to appoint
a committee to meet us, rest assured that your committee
will be met with due respect on our part. We believe these
little questions in law are injurious to our race, and we
think that something should be done on both sides to stop
the contention and bring peace between us. Some of your
ministers in the past have been very hostile to us, forbidding
us to preach in our own churches that were occupied
by your congregations, for which we are very sorry.
We only ask that which is ours under the law of the land,
<pb id="phill53" n="53"/>
and we assure you that if we have any of your houses of
worship we are ready and willing to give them up; and
we ask your honorable body to turn over to us all of our
church property throughout the South without the trouble
of lawsuits. We await your answer.</p>
                      <closer><signed>W. H. MILES,<lb/>
R. H. VANDERHORST,</signed>
<title>Bishops of the Colored Methodist Episcopal Church in
America.</title></closer>
                    </div1>
                  </body>
                </text>
              </q>
              <p>This letter might appear a little caustic and pungent,
but these blemishes and pert utterances disappear
when we consider the style of the writer.
Bishop Miles, who doubtless wrote the letter, was a
plain, positive man. He always wrote or spoke what
he thought, never seeking to confuse or mislead by so
doing. The letter breathed the spirit of Christ; it
only asked to be treated after the manner of the
golden rule: “Whatsoever ye would that men should
do to you, do ye even so to them.”</p>
              <p>This memorial letter was perhaps the last official
paper to which Bishop Vanderhorst ever signed his
name. He left Memphis in May, 1872, and died in
July of the same year. Bishop Vanderhorst was
really a worn-out preacher when elected to the episcopal
office. He was fifty-seven years old at the time
of his election, and was of frail constitution. His
episcopal career, though short, was brilliant, useful,
and successful. His death necessarily increased the
labors and responsibilities of Bishop Miles.</p>
              <p>The General Conference at Jackson, Tenn., adjourned
to meet in Augusta, Ga., in August, 1874;
but the death of one bishop, the rapid growth of the
Church, and its flattering possibilities necessitated a
<pb id="phill54" n="54"/>
called session; consequently Bishop Miles called an
extra session of the General Conference to meet in
Augusta, Ga., March 19, 1873. Not only was the
election of more bishops necessary, but there were
other matters of importance that needed attention.
L. J. Scurlock, who had been elected Book Agent
and assistant editor of the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi>, left his post for a
more lucrative field and became a member of the
Mississippi Legislature. E. B. Martin, pastor of Collins
Chapel, having been appointed to act in his stead,
was actually in training for the editorship of the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi>,
a position which, in the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi> of February, 1873,
Dr. Watson declared he could fill no longer than the
ensuing General Conference.</p>
              <p>Notwithstanding some irregularities, impediments,
and drawbacks, the work progressed steadily onward.
Wyatt Low, an earnest preacher in Georgia, writing
to the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi> in November, 1872, says:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>The Merriwether Circuit is doing well. I have received
over a hundred members this year. I have baptized one
hundred and ten. I will soon have four new churches on
my circuit. Elder J. T. Phillips<ref id="ref1" n="1" rend="sc" target="note1" targOrder="U">∗</ref>
<note id="note1" n="1" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref1"><p>∗J. T. Phillips was the brother of the author. He died
in peace, July, 1892.</p></note>
will dedicate a church
the third Sunday in November, and we hope to have Bishop
Miles preach a dedication sermon of a church near West
Point after the Conference. I feel that God has blessed my
circuit this year.</p>
              </q>
              <p>While missions, circuits, and stations were being
increased with a healthy membership, Bishop Miles
was holding Conference after Conference, getting
them in readiness for the fast approaching General
<pb id="phill55" n="55"/>
Conference. The East Texas Conference met at
Marshall, November 6, 1872. Bishop Miles, writing
of that session, says:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>Rev. Daniels, presiding elder of the district, had made
an arrangement with the officers of the Methodist Episcopal
Church to hold the Conference sessions in their church.
After religious services, several women came in, claiming
to be members of that Church, and ordered us out. One
very old lady, bending over a long staff, said: “My God,
brethren; I am a radical all over! Go away from here, you
conservatives!” I felt sorry for the old lady, to think that
politics had so deranged an old woman who was nearly in
the grave. I withdrew the Conference from their church
in good order. I told the brethren not to say anything;
and we then marched up to the Public Square, and halted
in front of the courthouse, where the Cumberland Presbyterians
offered us the use of their church. We did well
after that, and had a good time. We bought a lot on which
to build a church. The East Texas Conference is doing
well. They had an increase of 1,620 members, and ten
preachers were admitted on trial.</p>
              </q>
              <p>What is true of this Conference was true of all the
rest: they were constantly growing. Thus Bishop
Miles, an indefatigable servant of the Church, with
far more responsibility than any other one man in the
Connection, performed his duties faithfully until the
General Conference at Augusta elected three other
men to share with him the responsibilities of the episcopal
office.</p>
            </div2>
            <div2 type="chapter">
              <pb id="phill56" n="56"/>
              <head>CHAPTER VII.</head>
              <argument>
                <p>The General Conference of 1873—J. W. Bell Elected Secretary
—Some Visitors from the M. E. Church, South—
Bishop Miles' Memorable Message—Its Reception—Referred
to the Various Committees—J. A. Beebe, L. H.
Holsey, and Isaac Lane Elected Bishops—Their Consecration
—Memorial Services to Bishop Vanderhorst—
Some Legislative Work—The Educational and Missionary
Work of the Church—Some Important Reports—The
General Missionary Board Appointed—The Annual Conferences
Assessed for the Support of the Bishops—A
Committee Eulogizes the Life, Labors, and Character of
Bishop Vanderhorst—E. B. Martin Makes a Report on
Publishing Interests—Afterwards Elected Editor and
Book Agent—Conference Adjourns.</p>
              </argument>
              <p>IT is noticeable that very little writing was done
through the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi> by delegates respecting the election
of bishops and measures that were to be discussed and
perhaps adopted by the General Conference of 1873.
So quiet were they that the editor had occasion to remark:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>We would like to hear of the movements of the Bishop.
He may not have time to write much, but there are others
who can take the time; and if they do so, we can keep the
readers of the paper posted in regard to Church in matters.
Wake up, brethren! Let us hear from you about measures
to be adopted by the General Conference.</p>
              </q>
              <p>In the February number of the <hi rend="italics">Christian Index</hi>
Dr. Watson urged the delegates to make the selection
of bishops a matter of special prayer to God; that
much depended upon the men who were to be chosen
<pb id="phill57" n="57"/>
for the standard bearers of the cross of Christ; that
men sound in body and mind should be chosen; and
then the Church would enter upon a new era of prosperity.</p>
              <p>Accordingly the second General Conference of the
Church met in Augusta, Ga., in Trinity Church,
Wednesday, March 19, 1873, at 10 A.M. Bishop
Miles, the only bishop of the Church, conducted the
devotional exercises, and J. W. Bell, of Kentucky,
was elected temporary, and afterwards permanent,
Secretary.</p>
              <p>Since the first General Conference, Bishop Miles
reported having organized the Northwest Texas, Louisiana,
Missouri and Kansas, and North Carolina Conferences.
Their delegates were seated and a quorum
was announced.</p>
              <p>Among the visitors from the Church, South, were
Bishop George F. Pierce; Dr. Abby, of the Mississippi
Conference; Rev. J. E. Evans, Rev. C. W. Key,
Rev. Thomas Seals, and Dr. Hicks, of the North
Georgia Conference; and Several others.</p>
              <p>Much interest centered in the Bishop's message, as
it was to be the first message delivered to the new
organization. Below is the full text of that memorable
document:</p>
              <q type="address" direct="unspecified">
                <text>
                  <body>
                    <div1 type="address">
                      <p>REVEREND AND DEAR BRETHREN: The present session of
your body has been made necessary by the rapid growth of
the Church, the increasing demands of the work, and by the
lamented death of my beloved colleague, Bishop Richard
H. Vanderhorst. He was a good man, and commanded the
respect and confidence of the whites as well as the people
of his own race. He died in peace. I trust you will order
a suitable memorial of his character and services. Since
<pb id="phill58" n="58"/>
the sad event to which I have referred, the sole oversight
of our rapidly-expanding Communion has devolved upon
me. The work is too great for me, and the Church must
suffer unless the vacancy be filled. The interest at stake
is too vast and precious to be periled by waiting for the
regular quadrennial session. To strengthen the episcopacy
is at present an urgent demand. It is not three years
since we were set up as a separate and independent ecclesiastical
body. Then we had no certain statistics as to the
number of preachers or members embraced in our jurisdiction.
Eight Annual Conferences were represented in
the General Conference assembled at Jackson in 1870. As
reported to you on yesterday, I have organized four more—
viz., the Northwest Texas, the Missouri and Kansas, the
Louisiana, and the North Carolina Conferences. Two other
Conferences were made in regular session, and their delegates
are here to take their seats with you in this meeting.
Now I report to you 14 Annual Conferences, 635 traveling
preachers, 583 local preachers, and a membership of
67,888. In view of the opposition from certain quarters,
these results are very inspiring. Let us thank God, and
take courage.</p>
                      <p>The territory embraced in our Conferences is very large.
One or two men in the episcopacy can only make transient
visits to the chief points. A more thorough personal oversight
is necessary to an intelligent and effective administration.
As the result of my observations upon the State
and necessity of the work, I recommend the election and
ordination of at least three bishops.</p>
                      <p>It is eminently proper that I remind you officially of the
Christian kindness and consideration of the Methodist
Episcopal Church, South, toward us as a people. Under
the authority of their General Conference, their bishops
assisted in our organization by presiding at our first session,
ordaining our bishops, publishing our Disciplines,
and helping to redeem in spirit and to the transfer of
church property. The brethren of the Church, South, have
shown us great favor; and their debtors we are for sympathy
and encouragement, for brotherly counsel and material
aid, and for the transfer, under all the forms and securities
of law, of an amount of property which, left to
<pb id="phill59" n="59"/>
ourselves, we would not have realized in a generation. Let
our brotherly love toward them abound, and let us vindicate
their confidence in us by fidelity to our work and active
consecration to the mission whereunto we are
called.</p>
                      <p>Our publishing interests demand your careful examination.
Without specific advice, I suggest that they ought to
be permanently located, judiciously manned, and some
plan devised for the more liberal patronage of the <hi rend="italics">Christian
Index</hi> and the Discipline. These things are important, not
only for the sake of financial results, but for the advancement
of our people in intelligence and in Christian morals,
for the right training of the young, and to put to silence
the reproach of our enemies. We must become a reading
people if we would acquire influence, overcome opposition,
and maintain ourselves respectably among the Churches
of the land. Next to the maintenance of sound doctrine
and godly discipline (and it will be tributary to these), the
most vital point is the education of our people, and especially
the improvement of our ministry. With regard to
the latter, I suggest, as the best we can now do, to urge
great caution in licensing men to preach by the Quarterly
Conferences and to enforce in the Annual Conferences the
requirements of the course of study, holding all persons
steadily to the rule. As to the general subject, my conclusion,
after much thought, is to recommend the appointment
of a committee, with instructions to take counsel and
elaborate a scheme of education, to be submitted to the
General Conference at its regular session a year hence.</p>
                      <p>My judgment, brethren, is that you should not at this
time enter upon the work of general legislation. This
session was made necessary by the death of Bishop Vanderhorst,
the increase in the number of Conferences, and
the growing demand for episcopal service. Let us attend
to these things, make such preliminary arrangements for
the other interests to which I have called your attention
as you judge best, and then adjourn to resume our active
ministerial labors in our several fields of labor.</p>
                      <p>As an ecclesiastical organization, our growth has not
only been rapid, but healthy, and seems to contain all the
elements of permanence and broader development. Let us
hold fast whereunto we have attained. Let no man take
<pb id="phill60" n="60"/>
our crown. With the same singleness of purpose, the same
freedom from all entangling alliances with outside questions,
let us do the work of evangelists, and make full proof
of our ministry by preaching a pure gospel and building up
the Church in faith and holiness.</p>
                      <p>May the great Head of the Church guide you in the selection
of the chief pastors of the flock, and also to such
plans as shall bring glory to Him through the moral and
spiritual improvement of all our people.</p>
                      <closer><dateline>March 20, 1873.</dateline>
<signed>W. H. MILES.</signed></closer>
                    </div1>
                  </body>
                </text>
              </q>
              <p>The address of the Bishop, which sent a thrill of
joy through the hearts of all the delegates and visitors;
was referred to the respective standing committees
which had already been appointed.</p>
              <p>The Committee on Episcopacy reported that they
had examined the character and administration of
Bishop Miles, and also the labors of Bishop Vanderhorst
up to the time of his death, and found both
blameless in their lives and official administrations.
Upon the recommendation of the committee, their
characters were passed unanimously. The committee
further recommended the election of three additional
bishops, and the Conference concurred.</p>
              <p>On Saturday morning, March 23, 1873, after a few
pertinent remarks by Bishop Miles and a fervent
prayer by Bishop Pierce, who prayed for the guidance
of the Spirit in the solemn matter before the delegates,
the balloting proceeded. Votes cast, 41; necessary
to a choice, 22.</p>
              <p>On the first ballot Joseph A. Beebe, of North Carolina,
and L. H. Holsey, of Georgia, each received 39
votes, and Isaac Lane, of Tennessee, received 13,
being third next highest. A number of complimentary
<pb id="phill61" n="61"/>
votes were cast for W. P. Churchill, I. H.
Anderson, R. T. White, and others.</p>
              <p>J. A. Beebe and L. H. Holsey were declared elected
Bishops of the Colored Methodist Episcopal Church
by Bishop Miles.</p>
              <p>On the second ballot Isaac Lane received 27 votes,
and W. P. Churchill, 13.</p>
              <p>Bishop Miles announced that Isaac Lane, having
received a majority of all votes cast, was duly elected
bishop.</p>
              <p>Congratulations by the people and speeches by the
bishops-elect over, the Conference, on motion of I. H.
Anderson, elected Bishop Pierce to preach the ordination
sermon on the Sabbath, March 24, at 3 o'clock,
and Bishop Miles to preach the memorial sermon of
Bishop Vanderhorst at 8 P.M. Rev. B. S. Newton,
Rev. Job Crouch, Rev. Stokes Steele, and Rev.
William Taylor assisted in the ordination of the
newly elected bishops.</p>
              <p>This Conference displayed a disposition to remove
the Book Concern from Memphis to Nashville, the
question being discussed pro and con. Finally it was
continued at Memphis. The assessment of twenty-five
cents per member was changed to ten cents, for
the support of the Book Concern, and the presiding
elders were to see that the same was collected. An
editor was elected, who was to have charge of the
Book Concern, as well as edit the <hi rend="italics">Christian Index.</hi>
Some wanted to elect a general traveling agent to
travel in the interest of the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi> and the Book Concern,
and see to the judicious distribution of the literature
of the Church throughout the territory embraced
<pb id="phill62" n="62"/>
in its organization. A wiser plan was reached,
however, when the Conference ultimately decided to
have the bishops act as agents for the circulation of
the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi> and literature of the Church. Special
agents for publications in the Church have rarely
ever proven successful.</p>
              <p>To this General Conference is due the credit of
beginning the educational and missionary work of the
Church. The substance of the report on education
was: The bishops were instructed to take measures
looking to the establishment of an institution of learning;
to unite on the subject of education to the extent
of their opportunities; to receive donations and contributions
for the benefit of the cause, and acknowledge
the same in the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi>; that all preachers give it
their strict attention, and lecture on the subject occasionally;
and that the bishops bring the matter before
the several Annual Conferences for their consideration.</p>
              <p>The report of the Committee on Missions was no
less interesting. They adopted Chapter 10 of the
Discipline of that day, after saying twenty-five percent,
instead of forty per cent, of missionary moneys
raised shall be paid into the treasury of the General
Missionary Board. The officers elected were: B. E.
Ford, of Mississippi, President; I. H. Anderson, of
Georgia, Vice President; and E. B. Martin, of Tennessee,
Secretary. R. T. White, of Georgia; A. Bostic
of Tennessee; and S. Bobo, of Mississippi, were
elected a Board of Managers.</p>
              <p>The Conference voted an annual assessment of five
dollars on each Annual Conference for the support of
<pb id="phill63" n="63"/>
the widow of Bishop Vanderhorst during her lifetime.</p>
              <p>The Church was sadly in need of a well-regulated
financial plan, but it was necessary for the new organization
to become experienced in financiering before
such a plan could be inaugurated. To raise money
for the support of the bishops, the General Conference
made an assessment directly upon the Annual
Conferences rather than upon individuals. Each Conference
was assessed as follows:</p>
              <list type="simple">
                <item>Kentucky Conference . . . . . $325 00</item>
                <item>Tennessee Conference . . . . . 600 00</item>
                <item>Georgia Conference . . . . . 600 00</item>
                <item>Mississippi Conference . . . . . 250 00</item>
                <item>Arkansas Conference . . . . . 175 00</item>
                <item>North Mississippi Conference . . . . . 250 00</item>
                <item>East Texas Conference . . . . . 350 00</item>
                <item>Alabama Conference . . . . . 450 00</item>
                <item>South Carolina Conference . . . . . 100 00</item>
                <item>North Carolina Conference . . . . . 100 00</item>
                <item>Louisiana Conference . . . . . 300 00</item>
                <item>North Kansas Conference . . . . . 75 00</item>
                <item>Florida Conference . . . . . 75 00</item>
                <item>Virginia Conference . . . . . 75 00</item>
                <item>Northwest Texas Conference . . . . . 75 00</item>
              </list>
              <p>These assessments were never paid, and so the
bishops experienced many hardships; yet their zeal
for the Church abated not, neither did they cease their
labors.</p>
              <p>On the last day of the Conference, E. S. West, R.
J. Brown, J. A. Beebe, R. T. White, and Emanuel
Asbury, as a Committee on Eulogy, reported a preamble
and resolutions eulogizing the life, character,
labors, and achievements of the late Bishop Vanderhorst,
<pb id="phill64" n="64"/>
and recommended the erection of a suitable
monument to his memory.</p>
              <p>Dr. Watson, of the Church, South, who had edited
the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi> from its creation until the assembling of
the General Conference, having given notice that he
could in no sense longer hold the position, was, by the
members of the Conference, tendered a unanimous
rising vote of thanks for his pious labors and valuable
assistance in their behalf.</p>
              <p>E. B. Martin, the Acting Agent, by reason of L. J.
Scurlock's desertion, made a report of the paper and
book interests. From January, 1872, to March 1,
1873, $983 had been expended on the paper; $936.25
had been received; books on hand were valued at
$290.80; cash, about $60 or $70; while $1,630.90 was
the total amount paid out during the fifteen months.</p>
              <p>There were several new men in this body who were
not in the General Conference of 1870. Among
these were R. T. White, who has attended every quadrennial
session of the Church from that time; R. J.
Brown, who has long since died in peace; J. A. Beebe,
who in the same Conference was elected a bishop; J.
W. Bell; E. B. Martin, and others.</p>
              <p>The last legislative act of the Conference was the
almost unanimous election of E. B. Martin to the
Book Agency and editorship of the <hi rend="italics">Christian Index.</hi>
This done, the proceedings of the second General
Conference passed into history.</p>
            </div2>
            <div2 type="chapter">
              <pb id="phill65" n="65"/>
              <head>CHAPTER VIII.</head>
              <argument>
                <p>Fraternal Letter from the Bishops of the A. M. E. Church—
Editorial Comment by E. B. Martin—Death of Senior
Bishop William Paul Quinn, of the A. M. E. Church.</p>
              </argument>
              <p>The General Conference at Augusta, Ga., continuing
in session only seven days, adjourned before the
following fraternal letter from the bishops of the
African Methodist Episcopal Church reached Augusta.
At their request, it appeared in the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi>,
April 1, 1873:</p>
              <q type="letter" direct="unspecified">
                <text>
                  <body>
                    <div1 type="letter">
                      <opener><dateline>PHILADELPHIA, March 26, 1873.</dateline>
<salute><hi rend="italics">To the Members of the General Conference of the Colored Methodist
Episcopal Church, now in Session in Augusta, Ga.</hi></salute></opener>
                      <p>DEAR BRETHREN: The members of the Board of Bishops
of the African Methodist Episcopal Church, in session at
their episcopal rooms in the city of Washington, D. C., on
behalf of the said Church, send you their Christian greetings.
They take this method of expressing to you their
deep interest in your success in the new organization effected
under the generous auspices of the Methodist Episcopal
Church, South. We confess that we would have been
more than pleased if, in the providence of God, you could
have seen your way clear to have united with us instead of
increasing the number of independent organizations of
Methodists by one. This, we believe, you would have done
had you previously known and entirely understood the history
of the rise and progress, with the designs, intentions,
and manifest utility, of our Church, as you will, we trust,
hereafter know and understand them. Whatever the result
or consequence of such acquaintance may be, we trust
that the day is not far distant when you will be thus acquainted
with us and when all colored Methodists shall become
one great, united family. Indeed, is it not desirable
that the whole Methodist family should become one, under
<pb id="phill66" n="66"/>
one united system of doctrine, discipline, and government
in the United States of America? We believe you will say
with us that such a condition of Church fellowship is most
desirable. If the will of the Lord be so, we hope and pray
for it. Until then we shall rejoice in the success which
God may give to you. May it be your lot, dear brethren,
to help increase the membership of the Church of Christ,
and thus spread abroad a knowledge of his kingdom upon
the earth. We shall rejoice in your educational enterprises,
in your financial strength among our dear people
throughout this land. We thank God for the apparent
peace and prosperity which thus far have attended your
Church. May continued success attend your true and
faithful ministrations in the Lord.</p>
                      <p>We could not close our communication without alluding
to the fact that you, like we, have been called to mourn
the loss of one of the members of your Episcopal Board, the
Reverend Bishop Vanderhorst. In this loss we can sympathize
with you, as you may with us in the loss of our
senior bishop,<ref id="ref2" n="2" rend="sc" target="note2" targOrder="U">∗</ref>
<note id="note2" n="2" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref2"><p>∗The bishops of the African Methodist Episcopal Church refer here
to the death of Bishop William Paul Quinn, senior bishop of that Church,
which occurred at Richmond, Ind. Feb. 21, 1873.</p></note>
who left this world in great peace, leaving
behind him a most satisfactory testimony of his having
gone to that rest which remains for the people of God.</p>
                      <p>We are your brethren in Christ.</p>
                      <p>Signed, on behalf of the Board of Bishops,</p>
                      <closer><signed>JABEZ PITT CAMPBELL,<lb/>
T. M. D. WARD,</signed>
<title>Bishops.</title></closer>
                    </div1>
                  </body>
                </text>
              </q>
              <p>After closing the above document, they touched
upon the letter which Bishops Miles and Vanderhorst
had addressed to their General Conference with regard
to adjusting property disputes between their
members and ours. Concerning this they said:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>Touching the question of property, we are willing to
act strictly according to the principle of equity and right,
<pb id="phill67" n="67"/>
and earnestly hope that all disputes regarding the same
may be amicably adjusted.</p>
              </q>
              <p>E. B. Martin, editor of the <hi rend="italics">Christian Index</hi> at that
time, among other things, writes as follows concerning
that fraternal letter:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>We are very much gratified at the spirit and the subject-matter
of the letter. We regret it did not come in time to
be presented to and acted upon by the General Conference.
Let us respect and love each other as brethren beloved, laboring
for the same glorious end. The causes that led us
to be in separate bodies were in existence before most of
us were brought upon the stage of action. We have nothing
to do with the dead past, but with the present and future
of our beloved Methodism. Whatever we can do without
compromising our self-respect to bring about the best
state of Christian fellowship we will most cheerfully do.
Our brethren of the African Church may learn a lesson
from the Methodist Episcopal Church and the Methodist
Episcopal Church, South. Their bishops appointed one of
their number, with another distinguished minister, to attend
the General Conference of the latter Church, which
met in Memphis, May, 1870. Although they were received
most cordially and treated with the utmost kindness and
hospitality, yet officially they could not be received, because
they were not sent by their General Conference.
When the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal
Church was held in Brooklyn, May, 1872, they appointed
fraternal messengers<ref id="ref3" n="3" rend="sc" target="note3" targOrder="U">∗</ref>
<note id="note3" n="3" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref3"><p>∗The Methodist Episcopal Church, South, in refusing to recognize the
accredited fraternal messengers from the Methodist Episcopal Church,
must have done so because it was customary or lawful for such appointments
to be made by their General Conference. The fact that they were
so cordially received in 1874, at Louisville, having been appointed by
their General Conference at Brooklyn, fully justifies the statement. The
General Conference of the Colored Methodist Episcopal Church has delegated
the power of appointing fraternal messengers to the bishops; and,
so far as we know, other Methodist bodies have done the same.</p></note>
to attend the General Conference
of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, which met in
Louisville, May, 1874. They will doubtless be received with
<pb id="phill68" n="68"/>
pleasure. We contend, therefore, that the document which
came to us from the African Methodist Episcopal bishops
should have sprung from their General Conference. The
Methodist Episcopal Church sent delegates; we say to our
African brethren: “Go thou and do likewise.”</p>
              </q>
              <p>This fraternal message from the bishops of the
African Methodist Episcopal Church, breathing, as it
did, a spirit of union of all colored Methodists, was
the first of its kind to reach our Church; hence it is
recorded, that it may find a place in the early history
of our Methodism.</p>
            </div2>
            <pb id="phill69" n="69"/>
            <div2 type="figure">
              <p>
                <figure id="ill2" entity="phill069">
                  <p>MORNING CHAPEL, FORT WORTH, TEX.</p>
                </figure>
              </p>
            </div2>
            <div2 type="chapter">
              <pb id="phill71" n="71"/>
              <head>CHAPTER IX.</head>
              <argument>
                <p>The Bishops Holding Annual Conferences—Their Field
Not an Easy One—Some Epithets by which the Church
was Called—Some Early Persecutions—Letters from the
Bishops—Chapter Concluded with an Interesting Letter
from R. T. White, of the Georgia Conference.</p>
              </argument>
              <p>ACCORDING to the episcopal plan of 1873, Bishop
Miles held the Missouri and Kansas, Tennessee, North
Mississippi, and Kentucky Conferences; Bishop
Beebe, the Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina,
and Georgia Conferences; Bishop Holsey, the Florida,
Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama Conferences;
and Bishop Lane, the Northwest Texas, East Texas,
and Louisiana Conferences. As far as possible, the
three new bishops held the District Conferences belonging
to their districts. J. A. Beebe, who was a presiding
elder in the North Carolina Conference at the
time of his election to the office of Bishop; L. H.
Holsey, who was a pastor at Augusta, Ga.; and Isaac
Lane, in charge at Jackson, Tenn., wound up the affairs
of their charges before entering upon the duties
of the episcopal office.</p>
              <p>No easy field lay before these consecrated men.
The Church was in its infancy; it was maliciously
misrepresented, wantonly maligned, and frequently
calumniated by stronger religious denominations.
The relation of our Church to the Methodist Episcopal
Church, South, was the prolific cause of most of
the misrepresentations that were heaped upon us.
The Church was called a “Rebel Church,” “Democratic
<pb id="phill72" n="72"/>
Church,” and “the old Slavery Church.”
These were powerful weapons used against us, for the
reason that our people were naturally credulous, especially
concerning anything that might be said about
those who had kept their forefathers in slavery for
more than two centuries. Some were odiously inclined
to the Church, South; others refused social relations
with those who in any way affiliated with that
Church. Thus the credulity of the ignorant was
played upon with ease, and they joined in the rabble
cry: “Demolish the new Church!”—the “Democratic
Church.”</p>
              <p>The persecutions of those times have undergone
such changes, and we are so far removed from the
environments and conditions of those days, that it is
best for the present historian to let the men of that age
tell us of those persecutions. Bishop Miles, writing
to the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi> in January, 1873, says:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>I have traveled over a large portion of our work, and
have seen a great deal of the world. I find our work is doing
well. Men and means are what is wanted to do a great
work for Christ. We still have the political influence of
the Methodist Episcopal Church and the African Methodist
Episcopal Church to contend with. I wonder if they will
never get tired of telling falsehoods on our Church.
Through it all we have a right to thank the great Head of
the Church that, notwithstanding all they say and do, we
are yet on the gaining ground.</p>
                <p>The Missouri and Kansas Conference met in first session
near Santa Fé, Mo. The church having been burned just
before the Conference, we held the session in the woods,
and had a very pleasant time.</p>
              </q>
              <p>The letter of Bishop Holsey, which appeared in the
<hi rend="italics">Index</hi> of June 12, 1873, is in point here:</p>
              <pb id="phill73" n="73"/>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>I have just arrived home from a tour to Florida. I went
by way of Savannah; stopped there over night, and
preached two sermons in old Andrew Chapel to a small
congregation. The pastor, M. B. King, seems to be hopeful
of a better time. Sisters Susan Deas and Susan Carrier
have stood the storm of persecution from their African
friends like true heroines of the Cross; and they are still,
to a great degree, “the staff and stay” of the Church.
When will this spirit of persecution die?</p>
              </q>
              <p>Concerning the Church work at Tallahassee, Fla.,
the Bishop wrote:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>The Church here has had many hard and sore trials;
and after being “in the furnace of affliction,” she comes
forth purer than she was before, and is destined to distinguish
herself in a glorious career.</p>
              </q>
              <p>On his return from Florida, he remained over in
Thomasville, Ga., on the Sabbath, and preached
twice, to the delight of the people. Of the church
there he wrote:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>The church in this place has been burned by our enemies,
but a new one has been erected on the smoky ruins.
The present building is in debt, and has only a few members;
but these are faithful and true. Their African
brethren are still waging an unholy war of persecution
and slander against the innocent few because they choose
to worship God according to the dictates of an unfettered
conscience. What a crime to divide Churches, and then
burn the building! Is not this the frightful spirit of the
beast? Answer, ye church burners, if ye will; if not, ye
shall do it in the day of judgment.</p>
              </q>
              <p>The Bishop concludes his letter jocosely:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>I left Thomasville and came to Macon, Ga., where I met
my beloved colleague, Bishop Beebe, who was in fine health
and high spirits. After twenty-four hours spent at the
home of R. J. Brown, I bade them adieu. The “iron horse”
soon brought me home, where I found my family sick with
mumps and measles. Two of my children had been near
<pb id="phill74" n="74"/>
death's door, and a “new” member of the family had also
arrived two weeks before I did.</p>
              </q>
              <p>Bishop Lane, in October, 1873, left Jackson to
visit or hold what was then called the Northwest
Texas Conference, which met at Waxahachie. Arriving
a little ahead of the preachers, he visited the
African Methodist Episcopal Church of that town.
The impression of his visit he afterwards wrote to the
<hi rend="italics">Index.</hi> Speaking of the African Methodist Episcopal
brethren, he said:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>I was pained to meet with some opposition from them.
The minds of the people were prejudiced against us by reason
of certain rumors put in circulation by some of our opposers.
It would not be amiss to say that they charged
us with being a “Democratic” Church, which every one
who is acquainted with our organization and its operations
knows is not true. They also charged us with being under
the control of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South,
which everybody knows is not true. The Church, South,
controls its organization, and we control ours. At the
same time, we are pleased to say (which is nothing but
what truth and justice require) that the Methodist Episcopal
Church, South, is very kind to us, and always greets us
in Christian love and fellowship.</p>
              </q>
              <p>Bishop Beebe, in a letter to the <hi rend="italics">Index</hi>, dated March
25, 1874, says:</p>
              <q direct="unspecified">
                <p>Our work in North Carolina is progressing, not withstanding
the strong opposition by the Zion Church, which
has monopolized the largest portion of the members of our
Church because of the continued slander and unreasonable
accusations brought against us. Time has shown that we
are not a political Church. Our aim is the glory of God
and the salvation of the souls of men. The peaceable manner
of our Church has won for us the confidence of the majority
of the most intelligent people of our State.</p>
              </q>
              <pb id="phill75" n="75"/>
              <p>Much more might be written respecting the early
struggles of our Church, but enough has been recorded
to give those of this age, and those who are yet
to come upon the scene o