<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite.dtd" [
<!ENTITY bokumtp SYSTEM "bokumtp.gif" NDATA gif>
<!ENTITY bokumcv SYSTEM "bokumcv.gif" NDATA gif>
]>
<TEI.2>
  <teiHeader type="" status="new">
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title><hi rend="bold">The Testimony</hi> of a Refugee from East
Tennessee: Electronic Edition</title>
        <author>Bokum, Hermann, 1807-1878</author>
        <funder>Funding from the Library of Congress/Ameritech National Digital
Library Competition  supported the electronic publication of this
title.</funder>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text scanned (OCR) by</resp>
          <name id="cg">Kathleen Feeney</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Image scanned by</resp>
          <name>Teresa Church</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
          <name id="ns">Jeremy Jones, Teresa Church and Natalia Smith</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <editionStmt>
        <edition>First edition, <date>1998</date></edition>
      </editionStmt>
      <extent>ca. 150K</extent>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>Academic Affairs Library, UNC-CH</publisher>
        <pubPlace>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, </pubPlace>
        <date>1998.</date>
        <availability status="unknown">
          <p>© This work is the property of the University of North
Carolina
at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research,
teaching and personal use as long as this statement of availability is
included in the text.</p>
        </availability>
      </publicationStmt>
      <notesStmt>
        <note anchored="yes">Call number  973.78 B686t  (Wilson Annex,
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)</note>
      </notesStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>The Testimony of a Refugee from East Tennessee</title>
          <author>Bokum,
Hermann, 1807-1878</author>
          <imprint>
            <pubPlace>Philadelphia, </pubPlace>
            <publisher>Printed for gratuitous
distribution,</publisher>
            <date>1863</date>
          </imprint>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <projectDesc>
        <p>The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-CH
digitization project, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South.</hi></p>
      </projectDesc>
      <editorialDecl>
        <p>Any hyphens occurring in line breaks have been removed,
and the trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding line.</p>
        <p>All quotation marks and ampersand have been transcribed as
entity references.</p>
        <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as ” and
“
respectively.</p>
        <p>All single right and left quotation marks are encoded as ’ and
‘ respectively.</p>
        <p>Indentation in lines has not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Running titles have not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Spell-check and verification made against printed text using
Author/Editor (SoftQuad) and Microsoft Word spell check programs.</p>
      </editorialDecl>
      <classDecl>
        <taxonomy id="lcsh">
          <bibl>
            <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings,</title>
            <edition>21st edition, 1998</edition>
          </bibl>
        </taxonomy>
      </classDecl>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <langUsage>
        <language id="eng">English</language>
      </langUsage>
      <textClass>
        <keywords scheme="lcsh">
          <list type="simple">
            <item>Bokum, Hermann, 1807-1878.</item>
            <item>Refugees -- Tennessee.</item>
            <item>Refugees -- Southern States.</item>
            <item>Tennessee, East -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 --
Refugees.</item>
            <item>Tennessee -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Refugees.</item>
            <item>United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Refugee</item>
            <item>Secession -- Southern States.</item>
            <item>United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865.</item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change>
        <date>1998-02-24, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Natalia Smith, </name>
          <resp>project editor, </resp>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished TEI-conformant
encoding and final proofing.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1998-02-10, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Teresa Church  </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished TEI/SGML encoding</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1997-12-20, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Kathleen Feeney </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished scanning (OCR) and proofing.</item>
      </change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <front>
      <div1 type="cover">
        <p>
          <figure id="cover" entity="bokumcv">
            <p>[Cover Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="title page">
        <p>
          <figure id="title" entity="bokumtp">
            <p>[Title Page Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <titlePage>
        <docTitle>
          <titlePart type="main">THE TESTIMONY<lb/>
OF<lb/>
<hi rend="gothic">A Refugee from East Tennessee</hi></titlePart>
        </docTitle>
        <byline>BY</byline>
        <docAuthor>HERMANN BOKUM,
Chaplain U. S. A.</docAuthor>
        <docImprint><pubPlace>PHILADELPHIA:</pubPlace>
PRINTED FOR GRATUITOUS DISTRIBUTION.
<docDate>1863.</docDate></docImprint>
      </titlePage>
    </front>
    <pb id="bokum3" n="3"/>
    <body>
      <div1 type="text">
        <head>A REFUGEE'S TESTIMONY.</head>
        <p>IT may seem bold and self-confident, indeed, that in the
face of the multitude of pamphlets, addresses, essays and
treatises, which this war has called forth, I should add one
or more to the number. And yet there are some facts connected
with my past history and my present position, which may
sufficiently account for my appearing before the public just
at this time. Born and educated in Germany, I arrived in this
country in my twenty-first year, and after having spent
twenty-eight years in the North, under circumstances which were
especially calculated to endear to me the historic life, and
the institutions of the country I had adopted, I lived in East
Tennessee till treason there overthrew, for a time at least,
the Government of the United States. My attachment to the
Union compelled me to leave my home and my family to avoid
a dungeon. It was then, when for more than a year I had had
to witness the effects of a military despotism, which exalted
falsehood, fraud and robbery to the rank of virtues, and rode
rough-shod over every one that was unwilling to adopt this
creed, that I prayed God that the time might come when I, in
some humble way, might bear witness to the fearfulness of
the crime, which, by means the most foul, had in that region
of country at least, placed at the mercy of villains, the most
abandoned, the noble and devoted men of the country. Similar
prayers have risen from other lips, but their testimony will
only be heard in the day of judgment, for they have sealed their
faithfulness with their death. Yet it is not only recollections
like these which now impel me to write. When after having
fled from my home I at last had reached the lines of our
troops which were then stationed near Cumberland Gap, I
saw myself surrounded by hundreds of men with whom for
years I had mingled at their altars and their firesides,
and who like myself had been compelled to leave their 
<pb id="bokum4" n="4"/>
homes and families. Impressed with the fact, that my past life
would give me an influence in the North, which they could not
have, they asked me to do all in my power to induce the men
of the North to come to their relief, that they might be enabled
with their swords to make their way back to their homes. I
promised it, and now while I am about to fulfil this promise,
I pray God that He may prepare for my words a ready access
to the hearts of my readers. To all this I may add that I am
once more standing upon the ground on which first I stepped
when I came to this country, that not a few of those with
whom I became acquainted in early life are now, when far
advanced in years, my honored friends, and that they have
expressed a conviction that my extensive acquaintance in
Pennsylvania, where for years I have labored as a preacher
and a teacher, might enable me to impart information
concerning the first workings and the gradual progress of
treason in the South. Right or wrong I have acceded to their
request, and I would have acceded sooner if my duties as
chaplain of a hospital had not been of such a character as to
claim the whole of my time.</p>
        <p>East Tennessee, which late events have brought into such
general notice, is a portion of that elevated region of
country which embraces Southern Kentucky, Northern
Alabama, Northern Georgia and Western North Carolina. The
Cumberland Mountains in East Tennessee reach occasionally
the height of 2,000 feet, they are rich in minerals, from
their sides leap innumerable springs, flowing through
productive valleys and emptying finally into the Tennessee
or Cumberland rivers, the climate is magnificent, the
scenery grand and picturesque, the population of an
agricultural character, having comparatively few slaves. To
this region of country I had moved in 1855, I had purchased
a farm, planted vineyards and had gathered a small
congregation. I had indulged the hope that in the same
measure as I was endeavoring to make this home beautiful and
productive, my children would resist the temptation to change,
and this farm would be an heirloom in my family for many years
to come. Beyond my spiritual sphere and these agricultural
labors my ambition did not extend, and with but a trifling
<pb id="bokum5" n="5"/>
change I could adopt with regard to myself and my family
the beautiful lines of Barry Cornwall:</p>
        <lg type="stanza">
          <l>Touch us gently, Time!</l>
          <l>Let us glide adown thy stream,</l>
          <l>Gently as we sometimes glide</l>
          <l>Through a quiet dream.</l>
        </lg>
        <lg type="stanza">
          <l>Humble voyagers are we,</l>
          <l>Husband, wife and children three -</l>
          <l>Two are lost - two angels fled</l>
          <l>To the azure overhead.</l>
        </lg>
        <p>These humble hopes, however, were not to be realized.
It is now two years ago when I no longer could resist the
conviction that we were standing on the very threshold of a
treasonable attempt to break up the Union. At that time I
happened to be in the house of one of my neighbors. In the
course of the conversation the Union was mentioned by me.
“The Union,” said he, with a contemptuous smile, “the
Union
is gone!” I could hardly trust my ears. Here stood a man
before me, who was not like myself an adopted citizen, but a
native of this country, yet who was ready to obliterate from
the family of nations the land which for more than thirty years
I had learnt to regard as my own, and which had conferred on
me innumerable blessings. “Hear me,” said I to him, there was
a time when the disciples of the Lord had called blessings
upon Him; - the Pharisees asked him to stop his disciples, but
the Lord told them that if his disciples were to be silent, the
very stones would cry out. “You,” added I, “were born
in this
country, you have Washington and his time handed down to you
as a direct inheritance, I am but an adopted citizen, I am
but as one of the stones, but as one of the stones I cry out
against you.” It was at that time that a great Union meeting
was held in the vicinity of Knoxville. Horace Maynard was
occupied in another part of the State, but Andrew Johnson
and other leading Union men were there, and the question
was seriously debated whether East Tennessee should take
up arms and destroy the bridges in order to prevent the
sending of rebel troops from Louisiana, Mississippi and
Alabama to Virginia. Less extreme measures prevailed, the
bridges were not burnt, the troops from the Southern States
rushed into East Tennessee, and the Union men of East
Tennessee were singly overpowered and disarmed. In the
meantime Fort Sumter had fallen and some of the secessionists
<pb id="bokum6" n="6"/>
came to me and asked me to join the Southern Confederacy.
“You remind me,” said I, “of a good old bishop, when he
was led to the stake he was advised to abjure the Savior
and save his life. “Eighty and five years, was the answer
of the bishop, has my Savior graciously protected me, and
should I now forswear him?’ So say I to you; thirty and
five years has the flag of the Union with the help of God
nobly protected me, and should I now forswear it?” The
secessionists, however, became so violent in their
measures that I found it necessary to go to Washington in
order to consult the Hon. Andrew Johnson, who by that time
had succeeded in taking his place in Congress, and to find
out whether we soon would obtain help or whether I would be
compelled to move with my family to the North. When I went
to Washington, Tennessee was still in the Union, when I
returned it had been taken out by force and by fraud, and
I was compelled to find my way through the Cumberland
Mountains as best I might. Governor Harris had in vain
endeavored to get a convention sanctioned by the people, by
the means of which he had hoped to carry the State out of the
Union. He had then called an extra session of the Legislature,
and that body in violation of the express will of the people
had declared an ordinance of separation on the 6th of May,
submitting the question of Separation from the Federal
Government and of Representation in the Richmond Congress
to be voted on by the people on the 8th day of June.
<hi rend="italics">Against</hi>
Separation from the Federal Government and Representation
in Richmond, East Tennessee gave a majority of 18,300. It
would have been much larger if the votes of rebel troops had
not been counted, though under the constitution they had no
authority to vote at any election. In this way however the
State was forced out of the Union when a majority of her
people were utterly averse to any such separation.</p>
        <p>Having arrived at home after having past through many
trying scenes, I found that my journey to the North had
excited attention, and that threats had been made of hanging
me as soon as I should return. I, however, had to visit
Knoxville. When I entered the court house in that city, I
<pb id="bokum7" n="7"/>
found Judge Humphreys occupied in judging men, who had
committed no crime, but in various ways had expressed their
partiality for the Union. This is the same Judge Humphreys
against whom others as well as myself were cited to bear
testimony in Washington a few months ago, and who in
consequence of that testimony was deposed from his office.
When I had left the court house a friend took me aside,
himself a secessionist, and told me that I would do well to
leave the city, since in case the soldiers were to learn that
I had just come from the North, I in a few minutes might be
a dead man. Then came a time of darkness and oppression.
The battle of Manassas had taken place, and for four months
we were kept in the dark with regard to almost everything,
which could have a favorable bearing on the preservation or
restoration of the Union. It was during this time that Judge
Humphreys held court again in Knoxville, and that he himself
told the State's Attorney that he had no right to send Union
men to Tuscaloosa unless they were taken with arms in their
hands. The State's Attorney, a wretched drunkard, replied that
they had only been sent to Tuscaloosa in order to make of
them good Southern men. Shortly before this time some of
the Union men had secretly combined and had burned certain
bridges, in order to put a stop to the thousands of soldiers
who were every day passing on to Virginia. Mr. Pickens who is
now a Major in the U. S. Army, had taken part in this enterprise
and had escaped. In consequence of it, his father, a Senator in
the State's Legislature, had been seized and taken to Tuscaloosa.
One of my neighbors returned at that time from Tuscaloosa, where
he had been imprisoned, sick in body and in mind. He told me
that he had left the aged Pickens in good health, but that he
could not live, since he was confined with twenty- seven others
in a small room, and in the night they were not permitted to
open the windows. Pickens died. His wife when she heard it, lost
her reason and died ; a daughter being thus suddenly deprived
of her parents also cried of a broken heart! It was in this way
that the State's Attorney in Knoxville made of Union men <hi rend="italics">Good Southern Men!</hi> An acquaintance of mine, the Rev. Mr. Duggan, a highly respectable 
<pb id="bokum8" n="8"/>
clergyman, was compelled on a hot day to walk
twenty miles as a prisoner to Knoxville, because long before
the State had been carried out of the Union he had prayed
for the President of the United States. His horse was led
behind him, and he, though old and very corpulent, was not
permitted to mount it. When he had arrived in Knoxville,
he was declared free, and free he soon was, for God took
him to himself. That journey on foot had become the cause
of his death. A man named Haun had been taken to prison,
because he had taken part in the burning of the bridges.
The names of the persons who tried him have never been made
public. Not until he had arrived at the place of execution
did the public learn why he was to be executed. He was asked
whether he was sorry for what he had done, he replied, that
if placed in similar circumstances he would do it again, and
that he was prepared to die. Others beside him were hung,
still others were shot down or otherwise murdered. Nor did
this spirit of oppression extend to Union men alone. Shortly
before I left East Tennessee, a wealthy secessionist named
Jarnagan, who lived in my vicinity did not rest, till two
companies were quartered in that town, in order to keep down
the Union men. Three months afterwards he left his residence,
because, as he himself declared, his own friends had robbed
him of property worth $3,000, and would take his life if he
would not give up all. It was as still worse with Daniel
Yarnall, another secessionist, and also one of my neighbors.
He had complained concerning the conduct of some soldiers in
the Confederate army, and these soldiers had been punished;
in consequence of it they went to his house and stripped him.
He himself counted forty lashes, and then could count no more.
When the workings of this treason first commenced, and I on
my missionary tours was passing through the fruitful valleys
and over the pleasant hill sides of East Tennessee, and
beheld the fields ready for the harvests, and the industrious
men and women engaged in their daily round of duties, I
asked myself, whether indeed it was possible, that the mad
ambition of men would go so far as to desolate these scenes
of beauty. It has proved possible indeed! Where but two
<pb id="bokum9" n="9"/>
years ago there were all the elements calculated to make a
community prosperous, there is now misery and wretchedness
the most fearful, and the rule of an armed mob bent
upon indiscriminate plunder. Do you see yonder wretch? He
has been a drunkard and a vagabond all his life-time, yet
he has thousands of dollars in his pocket now, and he rides
the most beautiful horse in that whole region of country.
I could take you to the industrious farmer from whom he took
the horse, and whom he robbed of his money, and who now,
together with his wife and children are left in penury! Do you
see yonder girl? How beautiful she would be, if it were not
for the loss of that eye! That eye she lost in successfully
defending her honor against the assault of a Confederate
soldier, until her father could come to her aid and slay him.
Ah, my reader, you who live here so comfortable and so
undisturbed, have little knowledge of what is going on but a
few hundred miles from here. I have seen the man of eighty,
the oldest and the wealthiest man of a loyal district, who
at his age had joined the Home Guards, raise his trembling
hands to heaven, and ask God whether there was no curse in
store for deeds so cruel. I have heard the gentle woman
exclaim that she must have the blood of one of these men,
her spirit being maddened to desperation because they had
fired a hundred shots at her husband. Who could remain cold
at the sight of enormities like these? I have often been
asked whether the representations made by Brownlow and others
can be relied on. Neither Brownlow nor myself, nor any, nor
all of us can give a full record of cruelties which have been
perpetrated and are now being perpetrated in the recesses
of the mountains and valleys of East Tennessee, or of the
sufferings and the deaths through which East Tennesseeans
have to pass in the prisons of the South from want of food,
from filth, from absence of ventilation and from degrading
work.</p>
        <p>After the defeat of the rebels near Mill Spring had taken
place, I had to go secretly to Kentucky in order to attend to
some private affairs of mine. After my return the battle of
Pittsburg Landing had occurred, and Fort Henry, Fort Donelson
and Nashville had fallen into the hands of the Federal
<pb id="bokum10" n="10"/>
troops. In consequence of these reverses the conscription
law was enacted. There was a place of mustering near my
house, where in former times generally some 800 men had
mustered; that day only about 50 appeared. Two nights
after, almost all the men able to bear arms disappeared,
went to Kentucky, and entered the United Army. Then
Churchwell, the Provost Marshal of Last Tennessee, a man
who has since been called to the Judgment bar of God,
issued a proclamation and declared that if these men would
come back they should be permitted peacefully to pursue
their avocations; at the same time, however, he attempted
to seize some of the most influential Union men who had yet
staid behind. I was to be one of the victims; by a most
Providential combination of circumstances I received early
notice of the fact that five men were sent out to apprehend
me. I had made up my mind to go to prison. I could not bear
the thought of leaving the atmosphere where my wife and
my children were breathing, but my wife prevailed on me to
go to our friends in the North. Her last words were: “Fear
not for me, I trust in God;” I begged her to kiss our
children, and I turned into the mountains. Never I trust,
shall I cease to be thankful for the gracious manner in
which I was shielded from harm in that perilous journey.
Six months later my wife and my children arrived in
Cincinnati, having crossed the Cumberland Mountains in
the rear of the two contending armies, and having made
more than 300 miles in an open buggy. We have since removed
to this city, where I have been appointed Chaplain of the
Turner's Lane Hospital.</p>
        <p>Now, after having made these statements, which in a great
measure refer to myself, I wish to draw the attention of the
reader to certain subjects which are of vital importance to
all of us, and on which my past experience, such as I have
just described it, may enable me to shed some light. In the
first place, then, let me advise every one who reads these
pages to turn away from the man, who attempts to persuade
himself and others, that the South has been driven into her
treasonable course in consequence of the wrong inflicted on
her by the North. This, indeed, is one of the falsehoods by
<pb id="bokum11" n="11"/>
which the men of the South have attempted to excuse their
treason, but it was not the cause of it. Do you think, I
believed them, when they came to me about that time and
told me that the men of the North were a set of cowards
who would not fight, and that one Southerner could whip
five of them at any time? Do you think I believed them when
they spoke of drawing the line between the North and the
South along the Ohio river, and of erecting an immense
fortress opposite Cincinnati, and of battering down that city,
whenever the North interfered with slavery? Or do you think
I believed them, when they advised me to join the South,
because, if the South succeeded, East Tennessee would be a
great manufacturing country, and my little property would
increase a hundred-fold in value? Of course I did not believe
them. I knew too much about my friends in the North to
doubt their bravery, and I had seen too much of the want of
manufacturing enterprize in the South to indulge the hope that
my property would be worth any thing, if the South should
gain the ascendency. Just as little did I believe it, when they
came to me and told me that they were compelled to rise in
rebellion, because the North was resolved to rob the South of
their slaves. Had not I listened to the Rev. Dr. Ross and many
of the other leaders of the movement? Washington and
Jefferson and the men of <hi rend="italics">their</hi> time had, indeed, regarded
slavery as an evil which would gradually give way under the
influence of christianity; but not so these apostles of our
own time or of the immediate past. According to them, slavery
is the very foundation, on which christianity is resting,
take it away and christianity crumbles to pieces; according to
them on the existence of slavery depends the cause of freedom,
touch that institution and freedom as well as christianity are
crushed. Strange doctrines these, you say, yet these are the
doctrines which have been taught in the South by divine and
layman for more than twenty-five years, and taught for the
very purpose, which they now attempt to realize by their
treasonable movement, and into which they have been
drawn for reasons very different from those which they
have made public. It was indeed not abolition nor
<pb id="bokum12" n="12"/>
any other imaginary wrong inflicted on them by the North,
which influenced their action, but a conviction of a very
different character. With all their boasts concerning the
divine character of the institution of slavery, and the spiritual
and temporal blessings which resulted from it, they could not
conceal from themselves, that in its practical workings slavery
in many respects looked very much <hi rend="italics">like a curse</hi>. Why was it
that these vast multitudes of emigrants were peopling the
North, while they kept away from the South? Why, that
manufactures and commerce selected the North for their
favored home? How did it happen that if you started from
Pittsburg on your way to St. Louis, you would see on the right
hand side of the Ohio river, flourishing towns and cultivated
fields without number, while on the left, nature reigned
beautiful but unproductive? It was slavery which was the
cause of it, and the time was fast approaching when the South
compared to the North would be in a lamentable minority and
would lose that influence over the General Government which
it had so long enjoyed. Hence the criminal resolve of breaking
the Union to pieces, and of founding an aristocratic empire
with slavery for its basis, and the prospect of having untold
wealth, pouring into its bosom by re-opening the African
slave trade. Ah what anguish have we Union men of the South
suffered when one and another of these diabolical plans was
developed to our view. How vain the hope of being benefitted
by the resolutions of Crittenden, or by any other resolutions,
when we had learnt that the Union was to be broken to
pieces at every cost. Many an appeal reached the South at
that time from the great conservative body of the people in
the North, calling upon them to be but patient for a few
days and they should receive every security for their rights
which they possibly could desire. There were many hearts,
which bounded with joy and with hope at these appeals, but
they met no response in those Southern Senators, who had
it in their power to pass the Crittenden resolutions, but
who refused to vote, that they might break up the Union.
Abolition no doubt has to answer for many things, but it
never will have to answer for having brought about this
<pb id="bokum13" n="13"/>
rebellion. The power was rapidly escaping from the hands
which had wielded it so long, and that power was to be
preserved, though the country should be deluged in blood, and
the recollections of a glorious past be given to the winds.
Yet there are still those amongst us, who are sympathizing
with the South, on account of the wrongs it has suffered at
the hands of the North. I assure you that the slaveholders
of East Tennessee, who are Union men, do not feel that they
need such sympathy. They never have complained that
they have lost any of their rights, and they look with utter
abhorrence upon this attempt to obliterate from the family
of nations, a country which surpassed every other in a spirit
of justice and humanity. They are most decidedly of opinion
that God would be altogether just, if He should sweep away
the institution of slavery, which these men intend to make the
foundation of their empire, and if they also in consequence
of it have to suffer loss they are prepared for it. It
is by the preservation of the Union alone, that they can
have security not only for the property which may be left
them, but for liberty and life. Shortly before I left East
Tennessee, I was in the house of a wealthy slave owner, a
devoted friend of the Union. He spoke with tears of this
attempt to break up the Union, adding that there was a
report that the Government of the United States intended to
confiscate the slaves. He did not believe, he said, that the
Government would deprive loyal slaveholders of their property,
but in case it should be necessary, in order to preserve
the Union, he would gladly give up the slaves. Another
slaveholder, also one of my acquaintances, who had been
robbed of a large portion of his property, and who had been
in prison for months, at last reached his home again. “The
last dollar,” he said to his wife, “the last slave, if but
the Union be preserved, and joyfully we will start anew in
life.” “Think you,” said another distinguished slaveholder, a
gee from East Tennessee, <ref targOrder="U" id="ref1" n="1" target="note1">*</ref> the other day in the city of New
York, in the same spirit, “that for the pleasure of enjoying
the company of my wife and my babes whom I have not seen
for the last two years, I would not have willingly given all
<note id="note1" n="1" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref1">* The Rev. Mr. Carter.</note>
<pb id="bokum14" n="14"/>
that my negroes are worth, or all that they ever will be
worth to me?” Yet though the Union men of the South thank
them so little for their sympathy, the sympathizers here
are still going on in the same strain. “Pray, sir,” said
one of them to me but a few days ago, how would you like
it, if you had owned two hundred negroes and they had been
taken away from you?” “I would certainly feel satisfied,”
was my reply, “if at that price I had obtained security
for the property I might still have, but most of all for
my liberty and my life. I have not lost two hunderd slaves,
but I have lost all the property I owned, and which I
valued at six thousand dollars. Yet by giving it up and
escaping to the North, I again enjoy the benefits resulting
from the Union, and the means of supporting my family.”</p>
        <p>By facts like these I am readily reminded of others, which
it may be as well to mention in this connection. I have
very frequently heard of late the assertion, that this is not
a war for the Union but for the freeing of the negroes, and
gentlemen have told me, that they, indeed, are as much for
the Union as ever, but that they are constrained to oppose the
administration, because it has now raised issues which are
altogether foreign to the original objects of the war. Now in
order to meet this objection in a satisfactory manner, I beg
the reader to look at the beginning of this war. When the
South was going on in taking one aggressive step after
the other, and the United States Government still bore it
patiently, a gentleman, who is now prominent in the ranks of
secession, but who at that time had not made up his mind
which way he would turn, expressed great astonishment at
this conduct. “The United States,” he said, “are a powerful
nation, but even for a nation so powerful it seems strange to
be so slow in punishing treason:” Ignorant as I then was of
the extent of this treason, I gloried in this forbearance of
the United States because it was so much in keeping with the
spirit it had ever manifested to leave room for the loyalty
that might still exist in the South to make itself felt. At
a later period, however, the necessity of an energetic
movement had become evident, and government and people
unanimously declared that they were fighting, and would fight
<pb id="bokum15" n="15"/>
on for the Union and the Constitution. I became well
acquainted with this state of feeling, for I was then in the
North. But then, again, there came another phase of the
struggle. The Federal arms had been sufficiently successful in
taking possession of large portions of slave territory, and they
had to meet the question, what they should do with the negroes
of disloyal slaveholders. The question was finally solved by the
proclamation of the President, a document, which is the result
of the circumstances in which the disloyalists of the South
have placed themselves by their treasonable course. Thus it
has happened that thousands, and let me add, I am of the
number, while they have at all times opposed abolitionism, and
have been in favor of securing the South in all their rights,
have now come to feel, that treason has no rights whatever,
and that the negroes, if they furnish to traitors the means of
support, and of carrying on this war against the Union, should
be deprived of these means wherever an opportunity offers,
and that they ought to sustain the Government to the utmost in
their power, because it is acting in accordance with these
views. To illustrate this subject from what may be called the
common sense view of it, I beg leave to relate an incident
related to me by a clergyman, whose name I shall be happy to
give, as soon as he will permit me to do so. He had been
invited to deliver a patriotic address in a neighborhood,
which was not celebrated on account of its patriotism, and
hints had been dropped, that if he did go there he might
expect to be handled somewhat roughly. The clergyman
however did go. He proposed to stop at the house of an
acquaintance who was quite an excitable character. Before
entering the house, he heard that one of the agitators
on the other side of the question had been there in the
morning. He of course then expected a scene of a good
deal of excitement, and he was by no means disappointed.
Hardly had he entered when his friend rushed up to him, and
exclaimed: “Well, sir, it is all over now!” “What is over.”
“There is going to be a draft.” “Well, what of that?” “We
will not go !” “But you will be made to go.” “What, make fifty
thousand men go?” “Ah remember my friend, it is not every
<pb id="bokum16" n="16"/>
one thinks this way. It is only a little corner here of
Pennsylvania.” “But,” exclaimed the other with great
vehemence, “I will not fight for the nigger!” “Not fight
for the nigger,” said my friend. “Well, now, listen to me.
Suppose I were a general of the Secessionists, and had fifty
thousand troops under my command, and I were standing
here, and you were a general of the Union troops, and you
had fifty thousand men under your command, and you were
standing over there. And now suppose that you had learnt
that here back of my right wing I had stored a vast deal of
ammunition, and that you knew a way how to get round there
and take it away from me, you also knowing that if you did
take it, I would have no powder to fire at you, would you take
it?” “Certainly!” “And then suppose that you had learnt that
back of my left wing I had stored a considerable amount of
provisions, and that you had an opportunity of getting hold
of it, you knowing that if you succeeded in taking it, I would
have to do with half rations and might be very much disposed
to give up the fight; would you go and take it?” “Surely I
would!” “And then again suppose, that far in the rear of me,
there were five thousand negroes constantly at work in order
to supply me with the provisions I needed, and that you knew
a way how to catch them, and that you knew that if you did
catch them, I was sure to give up, for I would have nothing
whatever to eat. Would you go and catch them?” “Surely I
would.” “Well, that is all the Government proposes to do.”
“Is that all?” “Yes.” “Well I am for that!” So it is, my
reader, those who declare that the Government is no longer
fighting for the Union and the Constitution are far from
the truth. We have to accustom ourselves to the thought,
that as matters now stand in the South, traitors have no
right under the Constitution, and that the safety and the
perpetuity of the Union, demand that they should be
deprived of every means by which they are aided in their
treasonable course. He who opposes the Government in this
respect, is aiding and abetting treason, and to arrest
such and punish them is the duty which the Government
owes to the safety of its loyal citizens and to itself.</p>
        <pb id="bokum17" n="17"/>
        <p>And this brings me to another branch of my subject. I have
been often asked, what is likely to be the final result of
all this loss of treasure and of blood. A similar question,
I understand, one of my friends addressed the other
day to a prominent individual in Washington. The person
thus addressed was silent for a time, and then said with
deep earnestness: “Our prophets are dead and I cannot
tell.” By the prophets he meant those great statesmen
Jefferson, Monroe, John Quincy Adams, Andrew Jackson,
Clay, Webster and others, who in times gone by have been
our political teachers, and who have pointed out to us the
course we must take in order to enjoy peace and prosperity.
But however interesting and touching this answer may appear,
he could have given a better one. He could have said: “Our
prophets are dead, and yet they speak.” They speak by their
example, and by the writings which they have bequeathed to
us. Jefferson when he had been elected President said in his
inaugural address: “We have called those who are our brothers,
and who hold the same principles with ourselves by different
names,” referring thus mildly to the spirit of party which had
been manifested previous to the election. Monroe when he had
been President for four years, had so acted in the spirit of
the words of Jefferson, that when his re-election was to take
place, there was none to oppose him; the whole people formed
a great American Union party. When Jackson, the democrat,
had to contend against the doctrine of separation as
promulgated by South Carolina, there stood by his side, Daniel
Webster, the whig, and proved, particularly in his celebrated
speech against Colonel Hayne of South Carolina, that the
Constitution does not confer the right upon a single State, to
cut loose from the Union at its pleasure. And when, on another
occasion, again the safety of the Union was imperilled, it was
Henry Clay, the whig, who expressed his gratitude to certain
democratic members, because in the hour of danger they had
set aside all considerations of party, and had aided him in
preserving the Union. Nor would I forget John Quincy
Adams, who, when he entered upon his presidential career,
declared that no man who bore a good character and
<pb id="bokum18" n="18"/>
was fit for the office he held, should be deprived of it from
considerations of party, and who acted in accordance with this
declaration. Though dead, they speak. They tell us that now as
in time of Jefferson there are those, who, though they are called
by different names, are yet our brethren, who are holding the
same principles with us; they admonish us, that when the
existence of the Union is at stake, we for a time at least ought
to keep up our party lines less strictly, taking for our platform
the <hi rend="italics">Union</hi> as our forefathers have done; they speak to those in
power and tell them that in the choice of the men they employ,
they ought to be guided by merit and not by party
considerations, and they speak to those who hold responsible
positions under the Government, and remind them that they are
bound to carry out the policy of the Government, independent
of the fact that their associations of party would lead them in
a different direction. It is this ground which the Union men
of East Tennessee desire to occupy. When one of our wealthy
slaveholders, after months of imprisonment, had returned, he
was one day near his house, sitting upon a fence. Some
Confederate soldiers were passing by, and one of them called
to him to shout for Jefferson Davis. My friend refused to do so.
“Are you for Lincoln?” asked the other. “I am for the Union,”
answered my friend, “and if Lincoln is for the Union, then am I
for Lincoln.” The soldiers threatened to kill him, but at that time
did not do it. The Union is with the Union men of East Tennessee
the paramount question. Every other is secondary. They are willing
to lose sight of all party distinctions for a time, if the safety
of the Union should require it. In this connection, however, I
must once more allude to the subject of slavery. As I have
already had an opportunity of showing, they are willing to put
up with slavery, if that should be most conducive to the welfare
of the Union, and they are willing to do without it, if the good
of the Union should require it. It was sentiments like these
which I expressed the other day in a large Democratic meeting.
“Ah,” said one of my hearers, “then that is just as Mr. Lincoln
says: ‘The Union with slavery, if that be best, the Union partly with
<pb id="bokum19" n="19"/>
and partly without slavery if that be best, the Union without
slavery, if that be best; the Union any way.’ ” And they all
approved of the doctrine. I hope the time will come when
sentiments like these, which were uttered by loyal men in
Montgomery county in this State will be generally entertained,
and when we all shall feel the importance of that spirit of
forbearance, which in past times has guided us safely through
so many dangers.</p>
        <p>Among the many means which are used to mislead and
deceive men, few have been found more efficient than the
declaration, which we hear so often repeated, that we want
“the Constitution as it is, and the Union as it was.” When
these words are pronounced by certain individuals they are
exceedingly significant. They mean nothing less than that
this administration is an abolition administration, that it
is the cause of the war, that from the beginning it has carried
on the war to subjugate the South and to set the negroes
free, that it is a tyrannical administration subverting the
Constitution, and that there is no hope for this country
unless this administration can be overturned, the war be
stopped and the rights of the South be acknowledged. By
it they mean to say that they look with approval upon every
measure of the Southern leaders, while they have nothing
but abuse for the administration and those who sustain it,
that they deeply sympathize with Jefferson Davis and his
followers, while the men who have been driven from their
homes, they regard as traitors to the sacred cause of the
South, upon whom they mean to heap public and private
insults whenever an opportunity shall offer. Such is the
meaning of the words: “The Constitution as it is and the
Union as it was,” when these words come from certain lips.
It is the very essence of treason, busily engaged in stirring
up civil war in the North, openly or secretly. When uttered
by others it is done more thoughtlessly, and the principal
idea connected with them seems the conviction, that we
ought to make peace and go on as we did in former times.
It would be well, however, if men who make use of these
words would fairly determine what they ought to mean. I
also say: Give me the Union as it was. “Give it to me, to
<pb id="bokum20" n="20"/>
use the language of a distinguished East Tennesseans, <ref targOrder="U" id="ref2" n="2" target="note2">*</ref> as
it was, when Washington to suppress rebellion, sent into
Western Pennsylvania fifteen thousand men under the
command of his neighbor and friend General Lee..... When
Webster and Clay rallied to the support of Andrew Jackson,
and sent treason whipped and abashed to its lair. When
Millard Fillmore, called to account for the disposition of
his fleets in the harbor of Charleston, replied, that he was
not responsible for his official conduct to the Governor of
South Carolina.” Such “as it was” is the Union I desire.
Do not speak to me of a Union, such as it was, when James
Buchanan connived at the treason which the members of his
Cabinet were plotting, or when John C. Breckinridge poured
forth treason in the Senate of the United States. If it even
were possible to restore such a Union, it would be utterly
wanting in the elements necessary for its perpetuity. One
of the leaders of Secession in East Tennessee, a young man
full of self-conceit and a captain in the rebel army,
visited the house of one of our aged Union men, a descendant
of one of the revolutionary heroes. “Ah,” said the military
fop, strutting up and down the room, “you old men may indeed
talk of Washington and of his time as you do, but we who are
younger have been brought up under different influences, and
we follow different teachers.” It is even so, and it would
be in vain to think of forming a Union with men, who utterly
repudiate what to the American patriot are sentiments the
most sacred and the most true. The South has to be taught
that the falsehoods on which they attempt to erect their
slavery empire are not strong enough to serve their purpose,
and whenever they have been taught it, we may have a Union,
as it was in the days of this country's glory, a Union,
better fitted to bless the world than it ever has been
before, because chastened and purified.</p>
        <p>And there is still another representation made by designing
men, in order to mislead those who are little acquainted
with the condition of affairs in the South. It is said that if
in consequence of the war the negroes are set free they will
<note id="note2" n="2" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref2">* Speech of tile Hon. Horace Maynard of Tennessee, delivered in the
House of Representatives, January 31, 1863.</note>
<pb id="bokum21" n="21"/>
come to the North and will bring down the free labor of the
North to a ruinous extent. I have lived but six years in the
South, and I have seen slavery but in Tennessee, in Georgia
and in portions of South Carolina, Virginia and Alabama. As
far as my knowledge extends I am fully persuaded that
statements such as the one referred to are utterly void of
foundation. Let me say to my readers emphatically, that the
impressions which many have here in the North concerning
the slaves of the South are extremely erroneous. The negroes
are attached to the South by many bonds which are not easily
broken. The South they regard as their home, they greatly
prefer its climate; there many of them have families to whom
they are attached, and church relations which they highly
value; there they have an opportunity of making a good living,
with but little labor, and though many desire to be free and
daily pray for the success of the Northern arms, yet there is
not one of them, I believe, who would think of coming North
after he has obtained his freedom, and is placed in
circumstances which will permit him quietly to enjoy it. “I
care little,” said a wealthy slaveholder to me, shortly before
I left East Tennessee, “whether my slaves are set free or not.
If they were set free they would not leave me. I would pay
them what is right, and they would continue to work my
plantation.”</p>
        <p>Before concluding I may be permitted to make another
brief reference to myself. I need not say that Germany is
dear to me; in Germany rest the bones of my fathers; there
have I lived the beautiful days of my childhood and early
youth. In Germany there are now living those who are bound
to me not only by the ties of blood, but by ties which reach
far beyond the grave. Yet while Germany is dear to me, I
have also learnt to love this country during the thirty-five
years I have lived here. I love it because it has invited
millions like myself to its hospitable shores; I love it
because it has extended its protection not only in distant
lands or on distant seas, but also in every humble valley and
on every retired hillside. There the industrious farmer could
quietly attend to his daily avocation, and in the evening
return to the circle of his family, as I have done for years,
<pb id="bokum22" n="22"/>
and there under his own vine and fig-tree he could look
forward to the time when he would peacefully close his life.
When it seemed to be placed beyond a doubt that the Union
had ceased to exist, the friends of the South came to me once
more, and told me that I could have now no objection to unite
with them. I replied, that when I came to this country, I
swore allegiance to <hi rend="italics">the Union</hi>, that in case the Union had
indeed ceased to exist, I did not own allegiance either to the
South or to the North, that I would return to my native land
and there perhaps after many years, when far advanced in life,
I would take my children's children upon my knees, and with
streaming eyes I would tell them of a noble land, a powerful
Union, of which at one time I was a citizen. Since I have
come North and have once more met with old friends, who with
the fire of youth are ready to battle for the Union, which
has protected them for so many years, and since I have been
brought in contact with so many youthful spirits who go to the
field of battle with the same spirit which filled the heroes of
the past, I am strongly impressed with the fact that this Union
is by no means so near its dissolution as some of my Southern
friends seemed to think it was, and with John Adams I am
ready to say, “Sink or swim, live or die, survive or perish,
the fortunes of this country shall be my fortunes!” I stood
the other day on the spot where Melchoir Mühlenburg, the
founder of the Lutheran church in the United States, had
labored for many years. There at the time of the revolution
and on a certain Sabbath he had stood in his pulpit and had
preached Christ and Him crucified; he descends from the
pulpit, he puts off his gown, and he stands there before his
astonished congregation in full military costume. There is a
time for preaching, he says, and there is a time for fighting,
and my time for fighting has come.” Many clergymen are now
following his example. I know not what may be in store for
me, but I am certain that I am in the path of duty in
addressing these words of solemn warning to such as may
choose to read them. In what I have written I have briefly
traced the misrepresentations by which the leaders of the
South have succeeded in deceiving the great mass of the
<pb id="bokum23" n="23"/>
people and the misery which has been the result of it. If the
same spirit of deception should be successful here as it has
been in the South, then the picture I have drawn of East
Tennessee will be reflected in the valleys and on the hillsides
of Pennsylvania, we shall have here indeed the constitution
as it is, but as it is in the South with its armed mobs, its
spirit of indiscriminate plunder and its deeds of violence,
and we shall no longer worry about the danger of having the
slaves coming North, for we shall be <hi id="italics">all</hi> slaves, ruled with
an iron rod by our Southern masters, and by those few Northern
sympathizers and demagogues whom anarchy will make masters
instead of slaves.</p>
        <p>And now, in conclusion, I shall be permitted to make
another brief reference to one of our “prophets.” It is Daniel
Webster, who in closing the speech, in which he proves that
the constitution is not a compact between sovereign States,
dwells in a strain of touching sadness on the possible future
of the United States if the friends of nullification should be
able to give practical effect to their opinions. “They would
prove themselves in his judgment, the most skilful architects
of ruin, the most effectual extinguishers of high raised
expectations, the greatest blasters of human hopes that any
age has produced. They would stand forth to proclaim in
tones which would pierce the ears of half the human race,
that the last experiment of representative government had
failed .... Millions of eyes, of those who now feed their
inherent love of liberty on the success of the American
example, would turn away on beholding our dismemberment,
and find no place on earth whereon to rest their gratified
sight. Amidst the incantations and orgies of nullification,
secession, disunion and revolution would be celebrated the
funeral rites of constitutional and republican liberty!”
I am thankful that it is not my task to trace in detail
how much of the ruin which Daniel Webster thus anticipated
has actually come to pass. Mine is a more cheerful task.
However heart-rending the struggle may be through which
we are passing, it is not a hopeless struggle to him who
looks higher than the earth for a solution of it. If we
see many things passing away which long familiarity
<pb id="bokum24" n="24"/>
has endeared to us, it is that they may be supplanted by
higher and better ones. When the city of Geneva, threatened
by the Duke of Savoy, the Pope and the Emperor, was reduced
to the greatest weakness, its inhabitants still remained
undismayed. “Geneva,” they said, “is in danger of being
destroyed, but God watches over us; better have war and
liberty than peace and servitude; we do not put our trust
in princes, and to God alone be the honor and glory!” How
important the lesson which Geneva then was learning, and how
well for us if we prove equally teachable, if we also learn
to put our trust more fully in God than we have been disposed
to do, fearful as the trials may be through which we may have
to pass, we shall not be left without help. But in this respect
also our prophets are our teachers. The sentiments with which
Daniel Webster closed the speech, I have referred to, and
which are conceived in this spirit we are fearlessly to put
into action. “With my whole heart I pray for the continuance
of the domestic peace and quiet of the country. I desire, most
ardently, the restoration of affection and harmony to all its
parts. I desire that every citizen of the whole country may
look to this government with no other sentiments than those of
grateful respect and attachment, but I cannot yield even to
kind feelings the cause of the constitution, the true glory
of the country, and the great trust which we hold in our
hands for succeeding ages. If the constitution cannot be
maintained without meeting these scenes of commotion and
contest however unwelcome, they must come. We cannot, we must
not, we dare not omit to do that which in our judgment, the
safety of the Union requires.... I am ready to perform my
own appropriate part, whenever and wherever the occasion
may call on me, and to take my chance among those upon whom
blows may fall first and fall thickest. I shall exert every
faculty I possess in aiding to prevent the constitution from
being nullified, destroyed or impaired; and even should I see
it fall, I will still with a voice feeble, perhaps, but earnest
as ever issued from human lips, and with fidelity and zeal
which nothing shall extinguish, call on the PEOPLE to come to
its rescue.”</p>
      </div1>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI.2>