Funding from the Library of Congress/Ameritech National Digital
Library Competition
supported the electronic publication of this title.
Text scanned (OCR) by
Krista Eberl
Text encoded by
Don Sechler and Natalia Smith
First edition, 1997.
ca. 400K
Academic Affairs Library, UNC-CH
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
1997.
© This work is the
property of the University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research,
teaching and personal use as long as this statement of availability is
included in the text.
The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-CH digitization project, Documenting the American South.
Any hyphens occurring
in line breaks have been removed, and the trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding line.
All quotation marks and ampersand have been transcribed as
entity references.
All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as " and "
respectively.
All single right and left
quotation marks are encoded as ' and ' respectively.
Indentation in lines has
not been preserved.
Running titles have not
been preserved.
Spell-check and verification made against printed text using Author/Editor (SoftQuad) and Microsoft Word spell check programs.
Library of Congress Subject Headings, 21st edition,
1998
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1895, by
H. C. BRUCE,
In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.
The author offers to the public this little book, containing his personal recollections of slavery, with the modest hope that it will be found to present an impartial and unprejudiced view of that system. His experience taught him that all masters were not cruel, and that all slaves were not maltreated. There were brutal masters and there were mean, trifling lazy slaves. While some masters cruelly whipped, half fed and overworked their slaves, there were many others who provided for their slaves with fatherly care, saw that they were well fed and clothed, and would neither whip them themselves, nor permit others to do so.
Having reached the age of twenty-nine before he could call himself a free man, and having been peculiarly fortunate in all his surroundings during the period of his slavery, the author considers himself competent to deal with all concerned, fairly and without prejudice, and he will feel more than repaid for his labor, if he can throw even some little new light upon this much mooted question. He believes that we are too far removed now from the heart burnings and cruelties of that system of slavery, horrible as it was, and too far removed from that bloody strife that destroyed the system, root and branch, to let our accounts of it now be colored by its memories. Freedom has been sweet indeed to the ex-bondman. It has been one glorious harvest of good things, and he fervently prays for grace to forget the past and for strength to go forward to resolutely meet the future.
The author early became impressed with the belief, which has since settled into deep conviction, that just as the whites were divided into two great classes, so the slaves were divided. There are certain characteristics of good blood, that manifest themselves in the honor and ability and other virtues of their possessors, and these virtues could be seen as often exemplified beneath black skins as beneath white ones. There were those slaves who would have suffered death rather than submit to dishonor;
who, though they knew they suffered a great wrong in their enslavement, gave their best services to their masters, realizing, philosophically, that the wisest course was to make the best of their unfortunate situation. They would not submit to punishment, but would fight or run away rather than be whipped.
On the other hand there was a class of Negroes among the slaves who were lazy and mean. They were as untrue to their fellows as to themselves. Like the poor whites to whom they were analagous in point of blood, they had little or no honor, no high sense of duty, little or no appreciation of the domestic virtues, and since their emancipation, both of these inferior blooded classes have been content to grovel in the mire of degradation.
The "poor white" class was held in slavery, just as real as the blacks, and their degradation was all the more condemnable, because being white, all the world was open to them, yet they from choice, remained in the South, in this position of quasi slavery.
During the slave days these poor whites seemed to live for no higher purpose than to spy on the slaves, and to lie on them. Their ambitions were gratified if they could be overseers, or slave drivers, or "padrollers" as the slaves called them. This class was conceived and born of a poor blood, whose inferiority I linked its members for all time to things mean and low. They were the natural enemies of the slaves, and to this day they have sought to belittle and humiliate the ambitious freeman, by the long catalogue of laws framed with the avowed intention of robbing him of his manhood rights. It is they who cry out about "social equality," knowing full well, that the high-toned Negro would not associate with him if he could.
If there had been no superior blooded class of blacks in the South, during the dark and uncertain days of the war, there would not have been the history of that band of noble selfsacrificing heroes, who guarded with untiring and unquestioned faith, the homes and honor of the families of the very men who were fighting to tighten their chains. No brighter pages of history will ever be written, than those which record the services of the
slaves, who were left in charge of their masters' homes. These men will be found in every case to have been those, who as slaves would not be whipped, nor suffer punishment; who would protect the honor of their own women at any cost; but who would work with honesty and fidelity at any task imposed upon them.
The author's recollections begin with the year 1842, and he will endeavor to show how slaves were reared and treated as he saw it. His recollections will include something of the industrial conditions amidst which he was reared. He will discuss from the standpoint of the slave, the conditions which led to the war, his status during the war, and will record his experiences and observations regarding the progress of the Negro since emancipation.
It is his belief, that one of the most stupendous of the wrongs which the Negro has suffered, was in turning the whole army of slaves loose in a hostile country, without money, without friends, without experience in home getting or even self-support. Their two hundred and fifty years of unrequited labor counted for naught. They were free but penniless in the land which they had made rich.
But though they were robbed of the reward of their labor, though they have been denied their common rights, though they have been discriminated against in every walk of life and in favor of every breed of foreign anarchist and socialist, though they have been made to feel the measured hate of the poor white man's venom, yet through it all they have been true; true to the country they owe (?) so little, true to the flag that denies them protection, true to the government that practically disowns them, true to their honor, fidelity and loyalty, the birthrights of superior blood.
H. C. BRUCE,
WASHINGTON, D. C.
What Railroads Have Done for that Country and the South . . . . . . . .43
to get Assignments. - Rev. W.A. Moore and J.W. Wilson, Ex-Slaves Occupying good Charges . . . . . . . . 76
Master and His Friends. - Laclede Reached in Safety and Pursuers Fooled. - Full History of Flight, Escape, Marriage by Rev. John Turner of Leavenworth, Kansas. - Visit to Old Master in January, 1865. - Found him Dejected. - Farm Rifled by Thieves Dressed as Soldiers, but They Left Him the Land . . . . . . . . . 107
Not Treated Fairly by the Press. - Injustice of Mine Owners and Manufacturers. - All the Colored People Ask of the Americans is Fair Play in the Race of Life, With its Other Adopted Citizens . . . . . . . . 128
My mother often told me that I was born, March
3rd, of the year that Martin Van Buren was elected
President of the United States, and I have therefore
always regarded March 3rd, 1836, as the date of my
birth. Those who are familiar with the customs that
obtained at the South in the days of slavery, will readily
understand why so few of the ex-slaves can give the correct date
of their birth, for, being uneducated, they were unable to keep
records themselves, and their masters, having no special interest in
the matter, saw no necessity for such records. So that the slave
parents, in order to approximate the birth of a child, usually
associated it with the occurrence of some important event, such,
for instance, as "the year the stars fell," (1833), the death of some
prominent man, the marriage of one of the master's children, or
some notable historical event. Thus by recalling any one of these
occurrences, the age of their own children was determined. Not
being able to read and write, they were compelled to resort to the
next best thing within reach, memory, the only diary in which the
records of their marriages, births and deaths were registered, and
which was also the means by which their mathematical problems
were solved, their accounts kept, when they had any to keep.
Of course there were thousands of such cases as E. M.
Dillard's, the one which I shall mention, but as his case will
represent theirs, I will speak of his only. He was an intimate
acquaintance of mine, a man born a slave, freed by the
emancipation proclamation when over thirty years old, without
even a knowledge of the alphabet, but he had a practical
knowledge of men and business matters, which enabled him to
acquire a comfortable living, a nice home, to educate his children
and conduct a small business of his own. But the greatest
wonder about this man was the exactness and correct business
way in which he conducted it in buying and selling, and
especially in casting up accounts, seemingly with care, accuracy,
and rapidity as any educated man could have done. But it was
the result of a good memory and a full share of brain.
The memories of slaves were simply wonderful. They were
not unmindful, nor indifferent as to occurrences of interest
transpiring around them, but as the principal medium through
which we obtain information was entirely closed to them, of
course their knowledge of matters and things must necessarily
have been confined within a very narrow limit; but when anything
of importance transpired within their knowledge, they knowing
the date thereof, could, by reference to it as a basis,
approximate the date of some other event in question. Then
there were a great many old men among them that might be
called sages, men who knew the number of days in each month,
in each year, could
tell the exact date when Easter and Whit Sunday would come,
because most masters gave Monday following each of these
Sundays as a holiday to slaves.
These old sages determined dates by means of straight
marks and notches, made on a long stick with a knife, and were
quite accurate in arriving at correct dates. I have often seen the
sticks upon which they kept their records, but failed to
understand the system upon which they based their calculations,
yet I found them eminently correct. It was too intricate for me.
My parents belonged to Lemuel Bruce, who died about the
year 1836, leaving two children, William Bruce and Rebecca
Bruce, who went to live with their aunt, Mrs. Prudence
Perkinson; he also left two families of slaves, and they were
divided between his two children; my mother's family fell to Miss
Rebecca, and the other family, the head of which was known as
Bristo, was left to William B. Bruce. Then it was that family ties
were broken, the slaves were all hired out, my mother to one
man and my father to another. I was too young then to know
anything about it, and have to rely entirely on what I have heard
my mother and others older than myself say.
My personal recollections go back to the year 1841, when
my mother was hired to a lady, Mrs. Ludy Waddel by name.
Miss Rebecca Bruce married Mr. Pettis Perkinson, and soon
after her slaves were taken to their new home, then known as
the Rowlett Place, at which point we began a new life. It is but
simple
justice to Mr. Perkinson to say, that though springing from a
family known in that part of the country as hard task-masters, he
was himself a kind and considerate man. His father had given
him some ten or twelve slaves, among whom were two boys
about my own age. As we were quite young, we were tenderly
treated.
To state that slave children under thirteen years of age
were tenderly treated probably requires further explanation.
During the crop season in Virginia, slave men and women
worked in the fields daily, and such females as had sucklings
were allowed to come to them three times a day between sun
rise and sun set, for the purpose of nursing their babes, who
were left in the care of an old woman, who was assigned to the
care of these children because she was too old or too feeble for
field work. Such old women usually had to care for, and
prepare the meals of all children under working age. They were
furnished with plenty of good, wholesome food by the master,
who took special care to see that it was properly cooked and
served to them as often as they desired it
On very large plantations there were many such old
women, who spent the remainder of their lives caring for children
of younger women. Masters took great pride in their gangs of
young slaves, especially when they looked "fat and sassy," and
would often have them come to the great house yard to play,
particularly when they had visitors. Freed from books and
mental worry of all kinds, and having all the outdoor
exercise they wanted, the slave children had nothing to do
but eat, play and grow, and physically speaking, attain to good
size and height, which was the special wish and aim of their
masters, because a tall, well-proportioned slave man or woman,
in case of a sale, would always command the highest price paid.
So then it is quite plain, that it was not only the master's pride,
but his financial interest as well, to have these children enjoy
every comfort possible, which would aid in their physical make
up, and to see to it that they were tenderly treated.
But Mr. Perkinson's wife lived but a short time, dying in
1842. She left one child, William E. Perkinson, known in his later
life as Judge W. E. Perkinson, of Brunswick, Missouri. Mr.
Perkinson built a new house for himself, "The great house," and
quarters for his slaves on his own land, near what is now known
as Green Bay, Prince Edward County, Virginia. But I don't think
that Mrs. Perkinson lived to occupy the new house. My mother
was assigned to a cabin at the new place during the spring of
1842. But after the death of his young wife, Mr. Perkinson
became greatly dissatisfied with his home and its surroundings,
showing that all that was dear to him was gone, and that he
longed for a change, and being persuaded by his brother-in-law,
W. B. Bruce, who was preparing to go to the western country,
as Missouri and Kentucky were then called, he dicided to break
up his Virginia home, and take his slaves to Missouri, in
company with Mr. W. B. Bruce.
The time to start was agreed upon, and those old
enough to work were given a long holiday from January
to April, 1844, when we left our old Virginia home,
bound for Chariton County, Missouri. In this event
there were no separations of husbands and wives,
because of the fact that my father and Bristo were both
dead, and they were the only married men in the Bruce
family.
Among the slaves that were given to Mr. Perkinson
by his father was only one married man, uncle Watt,
as we called him, and he and his wife and children
were carried along with the rest of us.
I shall never forget the great preparations made
for our start to the West. There were three large
wagons in the outfit, one for the whites and two for the
slaves. The whites in the party were Messrs. Perkinson,
Bruce, Samuel Wooten, and James Dorsell. The line of
march was struck early in April, 1844. I remember that
I was delighted with the beautiful sceneries, towns,
rivers, people in their different styles of costumes, and
so many strange things that I saw on that trip from
our old home to Louisville. But the most wonderful
experience to me was, when we took a steamer at
Louisville for St. Louis. The idea of a house floating
on the water was a new one to me, at least, and I doubt
very much whether any of the white men of the party
had ever seen a steamboat before.
I am unable to recall the route, and the many sights, and
incidents of that long trip of nearly fifteen hundred miles, and
shall not attempt to describe it. But finally we reached our
destination, which was the home of Jack Perkinson, brother of
Mr. Pettis Perkinson, about June or July, 1844. His place was
located about seven or eight miles from Keytesville, Missouri.
At that time this country was sparsely settled; a farm house
could be only seen in every eight or ten miles. I was greatly
pleased with the country, for there was plenty of everything to
live on, game, fish, wild fruits, and berries. The only drawback
to our pleasure was Jack Perkinson, who was the meanest man
I had ever seen. He had about thirty-five slaves on his large farm
and could and did raise more noise, do more thrashing of men,
women and children, than any other man in that county.
Our folks were soon hired out to work in the tobacco
factories at Keytesville, except the old women, and such children
as were too small to be put to work. I was left at this place with
my mother and her younger children and was happy. I was too
young to be put to work, and there being on the farm four or five
boys about my age, spent my time with them hunting and fishing.
There was a creek near by in which we caught plenty of fish. We
made lines of hemp grown on the farm and hooks of bent pins.
When we got a bite, up went the pole and quite often the fish,
eight or ten feet in the air. We never waited for what is called a
good bite, for if we did the fish would get the bait and escape
capture, or get off when hooked if not thrown quickly upon the
land. But fish then were very plentiful and not as scary as now.
The hardest
job with us was digging bait. We often brought home as much
as five pounds of fish in a day.
There was game in abundance, but our hunting was
always for young rabbits and squirrels, and we hunted them
with hounds brought with us from Virginia. I had never before
seen so many squirrels. The trees there were usually small and
too far apart for them to jump from tree to tree, and when we
saw one "treed" by the dogs, one of us climbed up and
forced it to jump, and when it did, in nine cases out of ten
the dogs would catch it. We often got six or eight in a day's hunting.
Another sport which we enjoyed was gathering the eggs of
prairie chickens. On account of the danger of snake bites, we
were somewhat restricted in the pursuit of this pleasure, being
forbidden to go far away from the cabins. Their eggs were not
quite as large as the domestic hen's, but are of a very fine flavor.
North of Jack Perkinson's farm was a great expanse of
prairie four or five miles wide and probably twenty or thirty
long - indeed it might have been fifty miles long. There were a
great many snakes of various sizes and kinds, but the most
dangerous and the one most dreaded was the rattlesnake,
whose bite was almost certain death in those days, but for which
now the doctors have found so many cures that we seldom hear
of a death from that cause. When allowed to go or when we
could steal away, which we very often did, we usually took a
good sized basket and found eggs enough to fill it before
returning. We saw a great many snakes, killing some and passing
others by, especially the large ones. There were thousands of
prairie chickens scattered over this plain, and eggs
were easily found. One thing was in our favor; these wild
chickens never selected very tall grass for nests. But it almost
makes me shudder now, when I think of it, and remember that we
were barefooted at the time, with reptiles on every side, some of
which would crawl away or into their holes while others would
show fight. But none of us were bitten by them. On these prairies
large herds of deer could be seen in almost any direction. I have
seen as many as one hundred together. Jack Perkinson was not a
hunter, kept no gun, and of course we had none, so we could not
get any deer. There were a great many wolves around that place
and I stood in mortal fear of them, but never had any encounter
with one. They usually prowled about at night, and kept the young
slave men from going to balls or parties.
The most vicious wild animal I met or encountered was the
hog. There were a great many of them around the farm, especially
in the timber south of it. In that timber were some very large
hickory nuts - the finest I ever saw. I remember one occasion
when we were out gathering nuts, having our dogs with us. They
went a short distance from us, but very soon we heard them
barking and saw them running toward us followed by a drove of
wild hogs in close proximity. We hardly had time to climb trees for
safety. I was so closely pressed that an old boar caught my foot,
pulling off the shoe, but I held on to the limb of the tree and
climbed out of danger, although minus my shoe. One minute later
and I would not have been here to pen these lines, for those hogs
would have torn and eaten me in short order. From my safe
position in the tree I looked down on those vicious wild animals
tearing up my shoe. We had escaped immediate death, but were
greatly frightened because the hogs lay down under the trees and
night was coming on. We had shouted for help but could not
make ourselves heard. Every time our dogs came near, some big
boar would chase them away and come back to the drove. We
reasoned together, and came to conclusion that if we would
drive the dogs farther away the hogs would leave. Being up trees
we could see our dogs for some distance away and we drove
them back. After a while the hogs seemed to have forgotten us.
A few large ones got up, commenced rooting and grunting, and
soon the drove moved on. When they had gotten a hundred
yards away we slid down, and then such a race for the fence
and home. It was a close call. But we kept that little fun mum,
for if Jack Perkinson had learned of his narrow escape from the
loss of two or three Negro boys worth five or six hundred
dollars each, he would have given us a severe whipping.
About January 1, 1845, my mother and her children,
including myself and those younger, were hired to one James
Means, a brickmaker, living near Huntsville, Randolph County,
Missouri. I remember the day, when he came after us with a
two-horse team. He had several children, the eldest being a boy.
Although Cyrus was a year older than I, he could not lick me.
He and I had to feed the stock and haul trees to be cut into
wood for fire, which his father had felled in the timber. Mr.
Means also owned a girl about fourteen years old called Cat,
and as soon as spring came he commenced work on the brick
yard with Cat and me as offbearers. This, being my first real
work, was fun
for a while, but soon became very hard and I got whipped
nearly every day, not because I did not work, but because I
could not stand it. Having to carry a double mold all day long in
the hot sun I broke down. Finally Mr. Means made for my
special benefit two single molds, and after that I received no
more punishment from him.
Mr. Perkinson soon became disgusted with Missouri, and
leaving his slaves in the care of W. B. Bruce to be hired out
yearly, went back to Virginia. Some said it was a widow, Mrs.
Wooten, who took him back, while others believed that it was
because he could not stand the cursing and whipping of slaves
carried on by his brother Jack whom he could not control. This
man, Jack Perkinson, died about the year 1846, and left a wife and
three children. Although he had borne the reputation of being the
hardest master in that county, his wife was quite different. When
she took charge of the estate, she hired out the slaves, most of
them to the tobacco factory owners, and really received more
money yearly for them than when they worked upon the farm.
After her death the estate passed to her children and was
managed by the eldest son, Pettis, who was very kind to his
slaves until they became free by the Emancipation Proclamation.
I am informed that the very best of friendship still exists between
the whites and blacks of that family.
In January, 1846, with my older brothers I was hired to
Judge Applegate, who conducted a tobacco factory at
Keytesville, Missouri. I was then about ten years old, and
although I had worked at Mr. Mean's place, I had done no
steady work, because I was allowed many liberties, but at
Judge Applegate's I was
kept busy every minute from sunrise to sunset, without being
allowed to speak a word to anyone. I was too young then to
be kept in such close confinement. It was so prison-like to be
compelled to sit during the entire year under a large bench or
table filled with tobacco, and tie lugs all day long except during
the thirty minutes allowed for breakfast and the same time
allowed for dinner. I often fell asleep. I could not keep awake
even by putting tobacco in my eyes. I was punished by the
overseer, a Mr. Blankenship, every time he caught me napping,
which was quite often during the first few months. But I soon
became used to that kind of work and got along very well the
balance of that year.
Orders had been sent to W. B. Bruce by Mr. Perkinson to
bring his slaves back to Virginia, and about March, 1847, he
started with us contrary to our will. But what could we do?
Nothing at all. We finally got started by steamboat from
Brunswick to St. Louis, Missouri, and thence to Cincinnati,
Ohio. Right here I must tell a little incident that happened, which
explains why we were not landed at Cincinnati, but taken to the
Kentucky side of the river, where we remained until the
steamboat finished her business there and crossed over and
took us on board again. Deck passage on the steamer had been
secured for us by W. B. Bruce, and there were on the same
deck some poor white people. Just before reaching Cincinnati,
Ohio, some of these whites told my mother and other older
ones, that when the boat landed at Cincinnati the abolitionists
would come aboard and even against their will take them away.
Of course our people did not know what the word abolitionist
meant; they evidently
thought it meant some wild beast or Negro-trader, for they
feared both and were greatly frightened - so much so that they
went to W. B. Bruce and informed him of what they had been
told. He was greatly excited and went to the captain of the
boat. I am unable to state what passed between them, but my
mother says he paid the captain a sum of money to have us
landed on the Kentucky side of the river. At any rate I know
we were put ashore opposite Cincinnati, and remained there
until the streamer transacted its business at Cincinnati and then
crossed over and picked us up. The story told us by the white
deck passengers had a great deal of truth in it. I have since
learned that a slave could not remain a slave one minute after
touching the free soil of that state, and that its jurisdiction
extended to low water mark of the Ohio River. Slaves in transit
had been taken from steamers and given their freedom in just
such cases as the one named above. A case of this kind had
been taken upon appeal to the Supreme Court of the state of
Ohio, and a decision handed down in favor of the freedom of
the slave. The ignorance of these women caused me to work as
a slave for seventeen years afterwards.
Early in the spring of 1847, we reached the Perkinson farm
in Virginia, where we found our master, whom we had not seen
for nearly three years, and his son Willie, as he was then called,
with hired slaves cultivating the old farm. My older brothers,
James and Calvin, were at once hired to Mr. Hawkins, a
brickmaker, at Farmville, Prince Edward County, Virginia.
In as much as it was not
the custom in that state to put
slaves at work in the field before they had reached thirteen years
of age, I, being less, was allowed to eat play and grow, and I
think the happiest doys of my boyhood were spent
here. There
were seven or eight boys about my age belonging to Mrs.
Perkinson, living less than a mile distant on adjoining farms, who
also enjoyed the same privileges, and there were four or five
hounds which we could take out rabbit hunting when we wished
to do so. It was grand sport to see five or six hounds in line on a
trail and to hear the sweet music of these trained fox hounds. To
us, at least, it was sweet music. We roamed over the
neighboring lands hunting and often catching rabbits, which we
brought home. During the fishing season we often went angling in
the creeks that meandered through these lands to the millpond
which furnished the water for the mill near by, which was run by
Uncle Radford, an old trustworthy slave belonging to Mrs.
Prudence Perkinson. He was the lone
miller, and ground wheat and corn for the entire neighborhood.
There were several orchards of very fine fruit on these
farms. We were allowed to enjoy the apples, peaches, cherries
and plums, to our heart's content. Besides, there were large
quantities of wild berries and nuts, especially chinquapins. When
we had nothing else to do in the way of enjoyment we played
the game of "shinney" - a game that gave great pleasure to us
all. I was playmate and guardian for Willie Perkinson, and in
addition to this I had a standing duty to perform, which was to
drive up three cows every afternoon. At this time Willie was old
enough to attend the school which was about two miles away,
and I had to go with him in the forenoon and return for him in
the afternoon. He usually went with me after the cows.
I had been taught the alphabet while in Missouri and could
spell "baker," "lady," "shady," and such words of two
syllables, and Willie took great pride in teaching me his lessons of
each day from his books, as I had none and my mother had no
money to buy any for me. This continued for about a year
before the boy's aunt, Mrs. Prudence Perkinson, who had
cared for Willie while we were in Missouri, found it out, and I
assure you, dear reader, she raised a great row with our master
about it. She insisted that it was a crime to teach a Negro to
read, and that it would spoil him, but our owner seemed not to
care anything about it and did nothing to stop it, for afterward I
frequently had him correct my spelling. In after years I learned
that he was glad that his Negroes
could read, especially the Bible, but he was opposed to their
being taught writing.
But my good time ended when I was put to the plow in the
Spring of 1848. The land was hilly and rocky. I, being of light
weight, could not hold the plow steadily in the ground, however
hard I tried. My master was my trainer and slapped my jaws
several times for that which I could not prevent. I knew then as
well as I know now, that this was unjust punishment. But after the
breaking season and planting the crop of corn and tobacco was
over, I was given a lighter single horse plow and enjoyed the
change and the work. Compared with some of his neighbors,
our master was not a hard man on his slaves, because we
enjoyed many privileges that other slaves did not have. Some
slave owners did not feed well, causing their slaves to steal
chickens, hogs and sheep from them or from other owners.
Bacon and bread with an occassional meal of beef
was the feed
through the entire year; but our master gave us all we could eat,
together with such vegetables as were raised on the farm. My
mother was the cook for the families, white and black, and of
course I fared well as to food.
Willie Perkinson had become as one of us and regarded
my mother as his mother. He played with the colored boys from
the time he got home from school till bedtime, and again in the
morning till time to go to school, and every Saturday and
Sunday. Having learned to spell I kept it up, and took lessons
from Willie as often as I could. My younger brother, B. K.
Bruce (now Ex-Senator) had succeeded me as playmate and
guardian of Willie, and being also anxious to learn, soon caught
up with me, and by Willie's
aid went ahead of me and has held his place during all the years
since.
Mrs. Prudence Perkinson and her son Lemuel, lived about
one mile from our place, and they owned about fifty field hands,
as they were called. They also had an overseer or negro-driver
whose pay consisted of a certain percentage of the crop.
The larger the crop the larger his share would be, and
having no money interest in the slaves he drove them night and
day without mercy. This overseer was a mean and cruel man and
would, if not checked by her, whip some one every day. Lemuel
Perkinson, was a man who spent his time in pleasure
seeking, such as fox-hunting, fishing, horse racing and other
sports, and was away from home a great deal, so much so that
he paid little attention to the management of the farm. It was left
to the care of his mother and the overseer. Mrs. Sarah Perkinson,
wife of Lemuel Perkinson, was a dear good woman and was
beloved by all her slaves as long as I knew her, and I am
informed that she is living now and is still beloved by her ex-slaves
Mrs. Prudence Perkinson would not allow her overseer to
whip a grown slave without her consent, because I have known
of cases where the overseer was about to whip a slave when he
would break loose and run to his old mistress. If it was a bad
case she would punish the slave by taking off her slipper and
slapping his jaws with it. They were quite willing to take that
rather than be punished by the overseer who would often have
them take off the shirt to be whipped on their bare backs.
Mrs. Prudence Perkinson was a kind hearted woman, but
when angry and under the excitement of
the moment would order a servant whipped, but before the
overseer could carry it out would change her mind. I
recall a case where her cook, Annica, had sauced her
and refused to stop talking when told to do so. She
sent for the overseer to come to the Great House to
whip her (Annica). He came and pulled her out; she
refused to obey. He then pulled her outside and
struck her two licks with his whip, when her "old mistress"
promptly stopped him and abused him, and drove
him out of the Great House yard for his brutality. She
went to Annica, spoke kindly to her and asked her
if she was hurt.
I write of this as I saw it. I can recall only one or
two instances where our master whipped a grown
person, but when he had it do or felt that it should
be done, he did it well.
Our owner had one serious weakness which was
very objectionable to us, and one in which he was
the exception and not the rule of the master class.
It was this: He would associate with "poor white trash,"
would often invite them to dine with him, and the habit
remained with him during his entire life.
There lived near our farm two poor white men,
better know at the South as "poor white trash," named
John Flippen and Sam Hawkins. These men were
too lazy to do steady work and made their living by
doing chores for the rich and killing hawks and
crows at so much a piece, for the owner of the land
on which they were destroyed. These men would
watch us and report to our master everything they
saw us do that was a violation of rules. I recall one
instance in which I was whipped on account of a lie
told by Sam Hawkins. The facts in the case are as
follows: I was
sent one Saturday afternoon to Major Price's place
after some garden seed and was cautioned not to
ride the mare hard, and I did not therefore take her
out of a walk or a very slow trot as it was not to my
interest to do otherwise, for the distance was but two
miles and if I came back before sundown I would have
to go into the field to work again. I got back
about sundown, but had met Sam Hawkins on the
road as I went, and he was out our house when I
returned. He was invited to supper, and while at
the table told my master that I had the mare in a
gallop when he met me. Coffee was very costly at
that time, too high for the "poor white trash;" none
but the rich could afford it, and the only chance these
poor whites had to get a cup of coffee was when
so invited. It was always a Godsend to them, not
only the good meal, but the honor of dining with the
"BIG BUGS." Being illiterate their conversation
could not exceed what they had seen and heard, and
to please their masters, for such they were to
these poor whites almost as much as to their slaves, they
told everything they had seen the slaves do, and oftener more.
After supper that evening my master sent for me.
When I came, he had a switch in his hand and proceeded
to explain why he was going to whip me. I pleaded innocence
and positively disputed the charge. At this he then became
angry and whipped me. When he stopped he said it was
not so much for the fast riding that he had punished me as it
was for disputing a white man's word. Fool that I was then,
for I would not have received any more whipping at that
time, but knowing that I was not guilty I said so again and
he immediately flogged me again. When he stopped he
asked me in a loud tone of voice, "Will you have the
impudence to dispute a white man's word again?" My
answer was "No sir." That was the last whipping he
ever gave me, and that on account of the lie told by a
poor white man. But I lived not only to dispute the
word of these poor whites in their presence, but in after
years abused and threatened to punish them for
trespassing upon his lands.
Other ex-slaves can relate many such cases as the
Hawkins' case and such instances, in my opinion,
have been the cause of the intense hatred of slaves against
the poor whites of the South, and I believe that from
such troubles originate the term "poor white trash". In
many ways this unfortunate class of Southern people had
but a few more privileges than the slaves. True, they
were free, could go where they pleased without a "pass,"
but they could not, with impunity, dispute the word of
the rich in anything, and obeyed their masters as did
the slaves. It has been stated by many writers, and I
accept it as true, that the Emancipation Proclamation
issued by President Lincoln, not only freed the slaves,
but the poor whites of the South as well, for they occupied
a condition nearly approaching that of slavery.
They were nominally free, but that freedom was
greatly restricted on account of the prejudice against
them as a class. They were often employed by the
ruling class to do small jobs of work and while
so engaged were not allowed, even to eat with them at
the same table, neither could they in any way associate
or intermarry with the upper classes. Of course this
unfortunate class of people had a vote, but it was
always cast just as the master class directed, and not
as the voter desired, if he had a desire. I recall very
clearly the fact, that at each Country, State or National
election the poor white people were hauled to the voting
places in wagons belonging to the aristocratic class. They
also furnished a prepared ballot for each man and woe unto
that poor white man who failed to vote that ticket or come
when sent for. Each one of the master class kept a strict
lookout for every poor white man in his neighborhood
and on election days sent his wagons and brought each
one of these voters to the polls.
When the war of the
Rebellion broke out this
class of men constituted the rank and file of the Confederate
army and rendered good service to their masters, who
had only to speak a kind word to them when the would
take the oath and obediently march to the front, officered
by the aristocratic class. These poor people contributed their
full share to the death roll of the Southern Army.
True to his low instinct, the poor white man is
represented at the South as the enemy of the Colored
people to-day, just as he was before the war, and is still
as illiterate as he was then. He is not far enough up
the scale to see the advantage of education, and will not
send his children to school, nor allow the Colored child
to go, if it is in his power to prevent it. It is this class
who burn the school houses in the Southland to-day.
The aristocracy and the Colored people of the South
would get along splendidly, were it not for these poor
whites, who are the leaders in all the disorders, lynchings
and the like. The South will be the garden spot, the
cradle of liberty, the haven of America, when the typical
poor whites of that section shall have died off,
removed, or become educated, and not till then.
During the summer, in Virginia and other southern
states, slaves when threatened or after punishment would
escape to the woods or some other hiding place. They were
then called runaways, or runaway Negroes, and when not
caught would stay away from home until driven back by cold
weather. Usually they would go to some other part of the state,
where they were not so well known, and a few who had the
moral courage would make their way to the North, and thus gain
their freedom. But such cases were rare. Some, if captured and
not wishing to go back to their masters, would neither give their
correct name nor that of their owner; and in such cases, if the
master had not seen the notice of sale posted by the officers of
the county wherein they were captured, and which usually gave
the runaway's personal description, they were sold to the highest
bidders, and their masters lost them and the county in which the
capture was effected got the proceeds, less the expense of
capture. A runaway often chose that course in order to get out
of the hands of a hard master, thinking that he could not do
worse in any event, while he might fall into the hands of a better
master. Often they were bought by Negro traders for the cotton
fields of the South.
The white children had great fear of runaway Negroes, so
much so that their mothers would use the term "runaway nigger"
to scare their babies or to quiet them. I was greatly afraid of them,
too, because
I had heard so many horrible stories told of their brutality, but I
have no personal recollections of any such case. I recall two
instances where I had dealings with them. The first was as
follows: - One of our cows had a calf two or three days old hid
in the timber land, and I was sent to find it, and in doing so went
into the woods where the underbrush was quite thick, and
suddenly came upon a rough-looking, half-clad black man. I
was too close or too much frightened to run from him and stood
speechless. He spoke pleasantly, telling me where I could find
the calf, and stated that if I told the white people about him he
would come back and kill me. He had a piece of roasted pork
and "ashcake," and offered me some which I was afraid to
refuse Of course I did not inform on him.
The other occasion was when I was sent to the mill about
three miles distant with an ox-team and two or three bags of
corn and wheat. I did not get away from the mill until near
sundown, and when near home, while passing through a body
of timber land, a black man stepped out in front of my oxen and
stopped them. He looked vicious but said nothing. He got into
the cart and cut one bag in half, taking about one bushel of
meal, jumped out and let me go without further trouble. I told
my master about this but nothing was done, it being Saturday
night, and the only man near by who kept Negro hounds was Thomas
Rudd, who would not go Negro hunting on Sunday.
These runaways lived upon stolen pigs and sheep, and the
hardest thing for them to get was salt and bread. It was really
dangerous for any person to betray one of these fellows, for
when caught and carried home to their masters, they were
usually whipped.
But they would run away again, come back, lie in wait for their
betrayer, and punish him severely. Those who hired slaves
belonging to estates, which under the law had to be hired out
every year, often suffered in this respect, for it sometimes
happened the slaves would run away in the spring and remain
away until Christmas, when they would report to the guardian of
the estate, ready to be hired out for another year, while the
employer was compelled to pay for the last year's service. I
have known of several such cases.
I hope from what I have said about "runaways," that my
readers will not form the opinion that all slave men who
imagined themselves treated harshly ran away, or that they were
all too lazy to work in the hot weather and took to the woods,
or that all masters were so brutal that their slaves were
compelled to run away to save life. There were masters of
different dispositions and temperaments. Many owners
treated their slaves so humanely that they never ran
away, although they were sometimes punished; others
really felt grieved for it to be known, that one of their slaves
had been compelled to run away; others allowed the overseer
to treat their slaves with such brutality that they were forced
to run away, and when they did, the condition of those
remaining was bettered, because the master's attention would
be called to the fact, and he would limit the power of the
overseer to punish at will; others never whipped grown slaves
and would not allow any one else to do so. I recall an instance
showing the viciousness of these runaway Negroes, which I
think illustrates the point as to their hard character.
There was a slave named Bluford, belonging to a hemp
raiser in Salene County, Missouri, who owned a
large plantation, and owned a large number of slaves, and who
had a poor white man employed as overseer. This overseer got
angry at Bluford for some offense or neglect, and attempted to
flog him, but instead got flogged himself and reported to the
master the treatment he had received. The master sent for
Bluford, and without making inquiry to ascertain the facts,
proceeded to punish the slave, who in turn flogged his master
and then ran away. The Missouri River is a very wide, rapid
and dangerous stream, and runs between Howard and Salem
counties, only a few miles from his master's plantation. By some
means Bluford crossed it and hid himself in a wheat field on the
other side of the river to wait till dark. He told me that he was
hid in a corner of a fence, and the wheat being ripe was ready
to be cut. Now what spirit lead the owner of the field to get
over the fence right in that corner can never be known, but he
did, and found Bluford, whom he grabbed in the collar, and
refused to let go after being warned. Bluford was armed with a
butcher's knife, and with it he cut the man across the abdomen,
severing it to the backbone, causing death in a very short time.
Hunting parties were immediately organized, who searched the
surrounding country in vain for the murderer. I think this
occurred in July, 1855. I had been acquainted with Bluford
previous to that time.
Some time during the spring of 1865, I met Bluford on the
street in Leavenworth, Kansas, after he had been to Kansas
City, Missouri, to meet some relative. He gave me the facts in
the case, and told me that he followed Grand River to its head
water, which was in Iowa, then made his way to Des Moines,
where he remained
until the war, when he enlisted and served to the close
of the war.
Bluford could read quite well when I knew him in 1855,
and had paid attention to the maps and rivers of the state of
Missouri.
Then there were different kinds of slaves, the lazy fellow,
who would not work at all, unless forced to do so, and required
to be watched, the good man, who patiently submitted to
everything, and trusted in the Lord to save his soul; and then
there was the one who would not yield to punishment of any
kind, but would fight until overcome by numbers, and in most
cases be severely whipped; he would then go to the woods or
swamps, and was hard to capture, being usually armed with an
axe, corn knife, or some dangerous weapon, as fire arms at that
time were not obtainable. Then there was the unruly slave,
whom no master particularly wanted for several reasons; first,
he would not submit to any kind of corporal punishment;
second, it was hard to determine which was the master or which
the slave; third, he worked when he pleased to do so; fourth, no
one would buy him, not even the Negro trader, because he
could not take possession of him without his consent, and of
course he could not get that. He could only be taken dead, and
was worth too much money alive to be killed in order to
conquer him. Often masters gathered a gang of friends,
surrounded such fellows, and punished them severely, and at
other times the slave would arm himself with an axe, or
something dangerous, and threaten death to any one coming
within his reach. They could not afford to shoot him on account
of the money in him, and of course they left him. This class of
slaves were usually industrious, but
very impudent. There were thousands of that class, who spent
their lives in their master's service, doing his work undisturbed,
because the master understood the slave.
I am reminded of a fight I once witnessed between a slave
and his master. They were both recognized bullies. The master
was a farmer, whose name I shall call Mr. W., who lived about
three miles from Brunswick, Missouri. He had, by marriage I
think, gained possession of a slave named Armstead. Soon after
arriving at his new home his master and he had some words; his
master ordered him to "shut up," which he refused to do. The
master struck him and he returned the blow. Then Mr. W. said,
"Well, sir, if that is your game I am your man, and I tell you
right now, if you lick me I'll take it as my share, and that will
end it, but if I lick you, then you are to stand and receive twenty
lashes."
They were out in an open field near the public road, where
there was nothing to interfere. I was on a wagon in the road,
about forty yards distant. Then commenced the prettiest fist
and skull fight I ever witnessed, lasting, it seemed, a full half
hour; both went down several times; they clinched once or
twice, and had the field for a ring, and might have occupied
more of it than they did, but they confined themselves to about
one fourth of an acre. Of course Armstead had my Sympathy
throughout, because I wanted to see whether Mr. W. would
keep his word. They were both bloody and also muddy, but
grit to the backbone. Finally my man went down and could not
come to time, and cried out, "Enough." There was a creek
near by, and they both went to it to wash. I left, but was
informed that
the agreement was carried out, except that Mr. W. gave his
whipped man but six light strokes over his vest. Could he have
done less? But I have been informed that these men got along
well afterwards without fighting, and lived together as master
and slave until the war.
I believe in that old saying, that blood will tell. It is found
to be true in animals by actual tests, and if we will push our
investigations a little further, we will find it true as to human
beings.
Of course I do not wish to be understood as teaching the
doctrine, that blood is to be divided into white blood and black
blood, but on the contrary, I wish to be understood as meaning
that it should be divided into inferior and superior, regardless of
the color of the individual in whose veins it flows.
The fact of the presence in the South, especially, of the
large number of the typical poor whites, held as it were, in a
degree of slavery, is a contradiction of the assertion, that white
blood alone is superior.
If this class had superior blood in their veins, (which I
deny) is there a sane man who will believe that they would have
remained in the South, generations after generations, filling
menial positions, with no perceptible degree of advancement? I
venture to say not. The truth is, that they had inferior blood;
nothing more. To further explain what I mean relative to inferior
and superior blood among slaves, I will state, that there were
thousands of high-toned and high-spirited slaves, who had as
much self-respect as their masters, and who were industrious,
reliable and truthful, and could be depended upon by their
masters in all cases.
These slaves knew their own helpless condition. They also
knew that they had no rights under the laws of the land, and that
they were, by those same laws, the chattels of their masters,
and that they owed them their services during their natural lives,
and that the masters alone could make their lives pleasant or
miserable. But having superior blood in their veins, they did not
give up in abject servility, but held up their heads and
proceeded to do the next best thing under the circumstances,
which was, to so live and act as to win the confidence of their
masters, which could only be done by faithful service and an
upright life.
Such slaves as these were always the reliables, and the
ones whom the master trusted and seldom had occasion to
even scold for neglect of duty. They spent their lives in their
master's service, and reared up their children in the same
service.
Such slaves were to be found wherever the institution of
slavery existed, and when they were freed by the war, these
traits which they had exhibited for generations to such good
effect, were brought into greater activity, and have been largely
instrumental in making the record of which we feel so proud
to-day. This class of slaves not only looked after their own
interests, but their master's as well, even in his absence.
I recall a case in point. Some time during the fall of 1857,
in company with a man belonging to Dr. Watts, who lived near
Brunswick, Missouri, as we were passing his master's farm,
one Sunday night, we heard cattle in the corn field destroying
green corn. These cattle had pushed down the fence. I said to
the man: "Let us drive them out and put up the fence."
His reply was, "It's Massa's corn and Massa's cattle, and I
don't care how much they destroy; he won't thank me for
driving them out, and I will not do it."
To the class of superior blooded slaves may be added the
fighting fellows, or those who knew when they had discharged
their duty, and by virtue of knowing this fact, would not submit
to any kind of corporal punishment at the hand of their
master, and especially his overseer.
Just as among the whites in the South there was an inferior
blooded class, so among the slaves there was an inferior
blooded class, one whose members were almost entirely devoid
of all the manly traits of character, who were totally unreliable
and were without self-respect enough to keep themselves clean.
They spent their lives much like beasts of burden. They
took no interest in their master's work or his property, and went
no further than forced by the lash, and would not go without it.
They reared their children in the same way they had come
up, with no perceptible change for the better. They had not the
spirit nor the courage to resist punishment, and bore it
submissively. From that class, I believe, springs the worthless,
the shiftless, the dishonest and the immoral among us to-day,
casting unmerited blame upon the honest, thrifty and intelligent
colored people, who strive to live right in the sight of
God and man.
Another view held by people who have given the matter
some thought, is this: there were masters of quite different
temperament and disposition. Some had no humane feelings,
and regarded their slaves as brutes, and treated them as such,
while there were
others, (a very large class) who were good men, and I might
say, religious men, and who regarded slavery as wrong in
principle, but as it was handed down to them, they took it,
believing that they, by fair treatment, could improve the slave,
morally a least, for it was generally believed, that if he was
freed and returned to Africa, he would relapse into barbarism.
This latter class of slave owners treated their slaves better by
far, than the other class, and my belief and experience tend to
show that they got better service from their slaves, and enjoyed
more pleasure, being almost entirely freed from the
disagreeable duty of inflicting corporal punishment. I have
personal knowledge of cases where young slaves had violated
important rules, and the master, instead of punishing them
himself, would go to their parents, lay the case before them,
and demand that they take action.
In cases where the master had confidence in his slaves,
and they in turn had confidence in him, both got along
agreeably.
So that the point I wish to make is, that with few
exceptions, a good master made good slaves, intelligent,
industrious and trustworthy, while on the other hand, a mean
and cruel master made shiftless, careless, and indolent slaves,
who, being used to the lash as a remedy for every offense, had
no fears of it, and would not go without it. Some people assert
that long-continued ill-treatment had taken all the spirit of
manhood out of this class of slaves, and that it will take
generations of schooling and contact with intelligent people to
instill into them the spirit of manhood, self-respect, and correct
ideas of morality.
Admitting this to be true, I believe it is as much
the duty of the American white people to extend the necessary
aid to these unfortunate people, as it is the duty of the better
class among us, (the colored people), to do this work of
uplifting them.
I recently visited my old home in Prince Edward County,
Virginia, after an absence of forty-four years, and was greatly
surprised at the changes which had taken place during that
period. I had much trouble to find farms which I had
knowledge of, because I remembered them only by the names
they were called by in 1849. The owners of them had died or
moved away and others had acquired the lands, changing the
names of them, while other farms had been deserted and
allowed to grow up in forests, so that with a few exceptions the
country for miles in every direction was an unbroken forest of
young trees.
Among the many notable changes which have taken place
in this part of the State since 1849, are two or three to which
my attention was particularly directed. The first is the entire
change in the method of travel and transportation of freight and
produce between Richmond, the western portion of the State
and the Southern States.
The entire absence of the large number of six-horse teams,
in charge of a colored driver and a water boy, that used to pass
up and down the public road, which ran in front of our old
home, and which extended from Richmond to the Blue Ridge
Mountains, was quite noticeable, because that was the principal
method by which freight and produce were carried.
That system of travel and transportation has been
superseded by railroads, and goods are now delivered
by the Richmond & Danville inside of three days after purchase,
to any place on that railroad within two or three hundred miles.
This railroad now runs parallel with the old public road from
Richmond to the Blue Ridge Mountains and the South, and has
entirely usurped the trade formerly monopolized by the old
six-horse team system.
Very vividly do I recall the many six-horse teams which
used to pass daily up and down that old road with their great
loads of corn, wheat and tobacco, and return loaded with
drygoods and groceries for the country merchants. I have seen
as many as twenty of these teams pass our old home in one day.
The teamsters, though slaves, were absolutely reliable and
therefore, were intrusted with taking orders and produce from
country storekeepers to the wholesale merchants in Richmond
and on their return they would bring back the drygoods and
groceries that had been ordered by the country dealers living
along the road. Usually these wagoners went in squads of four or
five and camped at the same camping grounds. The owners of
these teams would come along about once a month paying and
collecting bills.
These great wagons, covered with white canvas to protect
the freight they bore, sometimes carrying from seven to ten
thousand pounds and each drawn by six fine blooded horses,
made to me at least, a grand and impressive picture, as the
procession moved along the old road in front of our place. This
picture was heightened by the picturesqueness of the colored
driver in charge and his peculiar and characteristic dress. As he
rode along on the sadle horse of the team he
seemed conscious
of the great responsibility resting upon his
shoulders, and to the simple-minded colored people along the
road he was simply an uncrowned king. When the wagons
stopped at the camping grounds, located at regular intervals
along the road, the colored people of the neighborhood flocked
around to get a glimpse of this great man.
Although the freight was very valuable sometimes and often
carried great distances, robbing or molesting these trains was
something unheard of. They were perfectly secure while on the
move or in camp, even in the most sparsely settled districts,
because there were no robbers or gangs of thieves organized in
those days to plunder passing teams It is quite doutful whether
the same would be true nowadays if a return to the old method
of transportation was resorted to.
The country merchants in
those days were contented and
happy, I suppose, to be able to get their orders filled and goods
delivered inside of from thirty to ninety days.
This great public
highway, which was kept in such splendid
condition in 1849 and prior thereto, and which had so many
beautiful camping grounds where wood and water were
convenient and not far apart, with little villages every ten or
fifteen miles, where there were inns for travellers to rest and feed
their horses has become a thing of the past along with that old
system of travel and transportation. I have seen many men,
called travelers in those days, pass over that old road going to,
or from the South or West on horseback, with large saddlebags
strapped behind them armed with a horse pistol, which was
about twenty inches long and as large as an old flint musket.
Usually they carried a pair of these pistols hanging down in
front of them, one on each side of the horses neck. That was
the usual way of travel in those days when persons wished
to go a long distance, particularly to the West or South.
Signs of this old road can yet be seen in places, but the
road has been almost deserted, and has grown up in
forest.
In front of our old place, and in fact from Millers Store, a
little village with a post-office, to Scofields, a similar place, a
distance of ten miles, that old road was nearly on a straight line,
was broad and almost level, and was the pride of that
community; but when I saw it in July, 1893, and attempted with
a horse and buggy to pass over it for a distance of a few miles I
found it impassable. From John Queensbury's Public Inn and
Camping ground to our old home, a distance of three miles the
old road has been entirely obliterated.
This road was kept in such a fine condition up to 1849
that many tobacco raisers used to put rollers around one or two
hogs heads of tobacco, weighing about a thousand pounds
each, then attach a pair of shafts and with a single horse draw
them to Richmond, a distance of sixty miles.
I readily recall many different kinds of travel and trade
which once thrived on this public highway. Richmond at that
date being a great pork market and the most convenient one for
the pork raisers of West Virginia and the Eastern portion of
Kentucky, and this old public highway being the most direct
route for travel from the West to Richmond, these hog raisers, in
order to reach a market for their hogs, were compelled to drive
them on foot over the road a distance of over two hundred
miles. I have seen as many as three hundred hogs in one drove
pass our old home in one
day going towards Richmond. Usually these hog drivers
brought along several wagon loads of corn to feed their hogs
while en route. They could and did travel from ten to twelve
miles a day, and from early fall to spring each year many
thousand hogs were driven into Richmond over this public
highway.
Besides supplying Richmond with pork, which in turn,
furnished other places, especially in the South, these hog raisers
sold hogs to planters on the road, who had failed to raise
enough pork for home consumption. Pork was the principal
meat diet at that time for both white and blacks there being few
sheep or beef cattle killed for table use, and then always for the
table of the master classes.
To advise a farmer now living in West Virginia or Eastern
Kentucky, who owns a hundred head of marketable hogs, to
drive them two hundred miles to market, as his father had done,
would be considered by him very foolish advice. But such was
the only way of transportation of that kind of product prior to
the year 1849, of which the writer has personal recollections.
These cases mentioned show clearly what railroads have
done, not only for Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee, but the
whole country and especially the Southern portion of it.
Richmond was also the principal slave market and this
public highway the most direct route to the Southern cotton
fields, especially those of Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana,
Arkansas, and Tennessee, and Negro traders passed over it
many times each year with gangs of slaves bought at the public
auction block in Richmond. I have seen many gangs of slaves driven
over this old road. Usually, the slave men were handcuffed
together with long chains between them extending the whole
length of the gang, which contained as many as forty,
sometimes, or twenty on each side of the chain marching in line.
The women and small boys were allowed to walk unchained in
the line while the children and the lame and those who were
sick rode in wagons. The entire caravan would be under the
charge of the owner and a guard of four or five poor white men
armed each with a rawhide whip, with which to urge the gang
along and to keep them in line or at least in the road.
It was not the custom, neither was it to the owner's
interest, to treat these slaves brutally, for, like mules brought up
to be carried to a better market, or where larger prices
prevailed, it was absolutely necessary that they should not show
any signs of ill-treatment; and I cannot recall ever having seen
the punishment of one of them. Of course these Negro traders
could not allow grown men to march in line unchained,
particularly those who did not want to go, because they might
become unmanagable, run away, and escape capture,
thus
causing the loss of the price paid for them, or at least give
considerable trouble. As a general rule, many of these slave
men were sold in the first place on account of
insubordination - had resisted their masters, or had beaten their
overseers, and such slaves were considered by their owners
dangerous fellows on the farm with others, especially young
men who might follow such examples. Then again many slaves
were sold because they had committed murder or some other
crime not deserving the death penalty, and there were no
penitentiaries for slaves.
These and many other recollections of my early life
crowded upon me as I looked upon the old familiar scenes. The
absence of familiar faces was no less remarkable than the
changes in lands and improvements, for I found only one man I
had seen before. There were two others whom I knew in that
vicinity and who had never left it, but I failed to find them at their
homes. I visited the home of Mrs. Sarah Perkinson, widow of
Lemuel Perkinson, mentioned in a previous chapter, but did not
see her, as she had left a few days prior on a visit to relatives in
North Carolina. I was really sorry I did not see her, for I could
have obtained much valuable information from her, as she had
remained in that community ever since the year 1849, and could
have given me an interesting history of past events. She still
owns the old Perkinson farm consisting of about two thousand
acres. The old frame mansion which was built before 1841 was
still there and in a fair state of preservation, and without any
apparent change since I last saw it forty-four years ago. I found
old man, Major Perkinson, one of Mrs. Perking former slaves,
occupying the Great House and tilling the land. There were
about fifty acres under cultivation; the balance had grown wild.
The old Major who is now ninety years of age and quite active,
remembered me very well and proceeded to treat me like a
southern gentleman of the old school would have done. I next
visited our old home which was one mile away. Here I found
the great house, also a frame building, built in the summer of
1842, in a good state of preservation, and as I went through
every room I am sure that there had been but little change in its
structure. I also visited the spot where my
mother's cabin stood, and then how forcibly those lines of the
poet touched my mind, "Childhood days now pass before me,
forms and scenes of long ago,'' etc. The quarters for the colored
people had disappeared here as well as those at Mrs.
Perkinson's place. This place is now owned by a Yankee lady
in New York, and of the six hundred acres under fence when
we left it in 1849, only four acres are now in use, the balance
having grown up in forest.
I visited several places of interest, and among them was
Green Bay, about two miles north of our old home. Here I met
Mr. Thomas Rowlett, the station agent, and one, Mr. Scott,
and a merchant named Richardson, whose father I
remembered. All three of these men are direct descendants of
the "Blue Bloods," and I found them still defending the right. I
was greatly impressed by a remark made by Mr. Richardson;
he said, "We are now, and will be for the next twenty years,
suffering from the curse of slavery; it cursed the slave, it
cursed his master, it cursed the land." He then called
attention to the thousands of acres gone wild, too
poor to produce anything, and the owners were unable to
bring them to a rentable condition, and the colored people
could not make a living on them and of course, left the country
in search of work. He said one could buy land anywhere in that
community for three dollars per acre. Of course it will cost at
least ten dollars more to bring it up to a fair state of cultivation.
When I saw these fine lands in 1849, tilled by slave labor, and
kept in the very highest state of cultivation, and on which
splendid crops of tobacco, corn and wheat were raised, I could
not have realized that in the space of forty-four years these
same lands
would be a wilderness, the owners scattered, and even the
former slaves gone. But so it is, and the names of the people
who owned them forgotten. The only men I found who had
remained and retained not only the old master's name, but the
farm as well, were the Scotts, consisting of the father, two
sons, Charles and Thomas, and a daughter, Mrs. Lefere. They
had acquired the old homesteads of their old masters in
each case and occupied the great house built of brick over
sixty years ago, and still in good condition. These farms were
adjoining each other and located on the Pike Road leading to
Farmville, and near Sandy River Church. I remembered these
farms and the Scotts very well, and also the church where
my master used to go to worship quite often, and allowed his
slaves to go occasionally on Saturday afternoon. Why I recall
this so vividly is, because Sandy River was a clear deep stream
with an abundance of fish, and while the older ones attended
divine service I went fishing.
The Scotts, Col. Scott, Charles and Thomas A. Scott,
brothers, were considered the most aristocratic people in that
community, and owned quite a large number of slaves and
treated them humanely, a fact which the father of the Scotts
now owning the lands will testify to. Old masters are dead, and
their children, having sold the old farms and scattered, their
former slaves now own these estates and are industrious and
thrifty farmers. They had the best crops I saw in that country,
with good stock in splendid condition. I found the wife of
Thomas Scott and Mrs. Lefere splendid housekeepers and
entertained as none but Virginia ladies can. Each had one
or more grown daughters, well educated, refined, and very
pretty girls. I confess my surprise at finding such intelligent
and fashionably dressed girls in that community.
It is encouraging to note the advancement made upon the
stronghold of ignorance, superstition and voodooism by the
Colored people, since their emancipation from the bonds of
slavery, and especially is this so to those who remember the time
when a large majority; of them believed strongly in all kinds of
superstition voodooism, gophering, tricking and conjuring.
I readily recall many instances wherein they were fleeced
out of their little valuables or money by professional humbugs,
known as conjurors, who succeeded in duping their fellow-slaves
so successfully, and to such an extent, that they believed
and feared them almost beyond their masters. I have known of
cases where these conjurors held whole neighborhoods, as it
were in such mortal fear, that they could do unto the Colored
people anything they desired, without the least fear of them telling
their masters. These conjurors made all kinds of boasts and
threats, as to what they could and would do to anyone who
dared to interfere with them or even dispute their word, or
question their ability to carry out what they claimed to be able to
do.
These conjurors claimed to be able to do almost anything
in the line of impossibilities, even to taking lift by the winking of
their eye, to make a master be kind to a slave, to prevent him
from selling one, even if he desired to do so, to make a girl love
a man, whether she desired him or not, to make a man love and
even marry a woman if she desired him.
For a stipulated sum paid them, they would give what was
called "a hand or a jack," which they claimed would enable the
horde to accomplish what he desired, and at the same time
protect him from all harm, provided always, that the holder had
faith and followed instructions.
These conjurors claimed to be able to bury a hand or a
jack under the master's door step, which would prevent him
from whipping a particular slave while it was there. Of course,
if that particular slave got whipped, and so reported to the old
conjuror, he would promptly claim one of three things, either
that someone had removed the jack, or that the fellow had
failed to carry out instructions, or had no faith in the jack, and
therefore was deserving of punishment.
These conjurors claimed to be able to put pain, or even
permanent disability upon any one they desired, and could
remove the trick put on by another conjuror, could cause live
scorpions to appear under the skin of persons, and could take
out those put there by other conjurors. They claimed that nearly
every pain or ache was the result of conjuration, and the one
sent for could take it off. To show to what extent these people
believed in voodooism, and could be fleeced, I will relate a story
told me by Ike Cabel, of Brunswick, Mo. He said he was out
with a surveying party about the year I852, and camped near a
large plantation in Louisiana. He gave it out among the slaves
that he was a conjuror, and soon thereafter his camp was
besieged every night by slaves with all kinds of aches and pains,
which he cured with red clay, oak leaves and salt boiled, and
collected fifty cents from each. A man came one night claiming
that he had a scorpion in his
leg, and that he felt it running up and down the leg. He told the
man to come the next night, which he did. The next day he
wanted a live scorpion, and being afraid of it himself, he got two
young white men of the party to catch one for him, promising
them one-half he was to receive for the job, and of course, let
them into the secret. They captured a scorpion, wrapped it up
carefully in brown paper, so that it could not escape or bite, and
delivered it to Ike.
After rubbing the man's leg for a while with his other trick
medicine with one hand, carefully holding his little animal in the
other, and when ready for the final act, he looked heavenward,
and in a loud voice commanded the scorpion to come out of the
man's leg. Then in a few seconds he informed his dupe that the
animal had come, and at the same time, and by a quick motion,
freed the scorpion and brushed it from the leg to the floor, when
the freed scorpion attempted to escape, and was killed and
carried away by the patient after paying the three dollars.
Now it would have been a hard job to convince that poor,
innocent, unsuspecting man, that he did not have a live scorpion
taken from his leg. His imagination was cured, and he was
satisfied, and spread the news far and wide of his wonderful
cure.
It is claimed that the way scorpions and other little
poisonous animals or insects are gotten into the body is through
whiskey. That the little scorpion is killed and laid out to dry, and
when thoroughly dried is beaten into dust, and the dust put into a
bottle of whiskey, and in a short time after being drank will
reproduce itself, whatever it is, under the skin of the drinker. At
any rate, I remember that conjurors were
never asked for a drink of whiskey, and people were always
afraid to take a drink from some men's bottle until the owner
had drank first, "to take the poison off."
These conjurors practiced with different kinds of roots,
seeds, barks, insects, and other strange ingredients, but polk
root and green planten were among their principal remedies to
take off a trick or a pain. Of course they had some queer ways
of mixing things to make it appear mysterious A poultice made of
polk root is said to be a good remedy for rheumatism, and these
conjurors probably knew that, and put in the poultice a few
harmless things to make it appear strange, and if the rheumatic
pain was removed, they would claim that they had taken off a
trick put there by some conjuror. Of course different conjurors
have different jacks and different "hands," but the two I saw
were composed of hog-bristles, old horse shoe nails, a little red
clay, salt, red pepper, red oak leaves, soaked in vinegar, then
wrapped in a roll about three inches long and one inch thick, and
tied with a yarn string very tightly. There is a peculiar lingo to
accompany the "jack," and it varies according to requirements.
To show how thoroughly these people believed in
conjurors, and to what extent they could be imposed upon by
them, I will relate one more instance, which was told me by an
old lady whose word I cannot doubt, and whom I have known
for these many years, but to honor and cheer. She said that she
belonged to one of two brothers living on adjoining farms in
Amelia County, Va, prior to the year 1830, and that one of them
was a bachelor and the other a widower, and that they loved
each other dearly. That they owned about
thirty slaves each, and that one of them decided to break up and
take his slaves to Alabama, and made all arrangements to do
so. When the day came to start, he gave the order to load the
wagons and hitch up the horses, which was done, and that they
remained standing, as did the slaves, until late in the
afternoon, when the master came to the front door and gave
orders to unload and unhitch the teams, and for the slaves to go
to his brother's field to work. On the next day he left on
horseback in company with another man bound for Alabama.
She said that many of his slaves did not want to go, and
hearing of a great conjuror living ten miles away, made up a
purse and sent for him. He came the night previous to the time
set for starting to Alabama. My informant says, that he told them
upon his arrival, that they hid waited too long in sending for him,
that if they had sent for him earlier he could have stopped all, but
now he could only stop the slaves from going, and even that
would depend on whether the master walked over a "hand,"
which he was going to put under the front door steps. She says
the old conjuror went to the front door steps of the great house
about twelve o'clock that night, dug a small hole under the
ground step, took from his pocket a little ball, talked to it a while
in a whisper, then kissed it and put it in the hole, and covered it
carefully and came away. That the slaves, she among them,
watched the old master next morning, until they saw him come
down the steps and walk around a while, then go back over this
particular step. That they were then satisfied that the old master
could not take them anywhere, and he did not.
I was never able to convince my dear old lady friend that
all conjurors were humbugs, and this one was among them, and
that it was purely a matter of chance so far as he was
concerned. I do not want it understood that these conjurors
were believed in by all Colored people, for there were a large
number of intelligent ones, who paid no attention to conjurors,
even defied them, told them that they were humbugs and liars
These conjurors were a shrewd set of fellows, and on that
account alone were enabled to fool the less informed. They were
industrious, and hard working, and faithful servants, and of
course received no punishment, and were keen enough to point
to this fact as evidence of the power of their jack in keeping their
master under control, when, as a matter of fact, it was their
faithful service alone that protected them from the lash.
There have been cases where Colored people took sick
from some cause, and imagined themselves tricked or poisoned
by some one, and the white doctor, unable to do them any
good, gave up the case, and the patients, believing themselves
poisoned and therefore incurable, have died, when they might
have been saved, if the white doctor had only thought for a
moment, and instead of giving up the case, announced himself a
conjuror, and proceeded to doctor his patient's mind.
Superstition in some form has always existed, especially
among illiterate people, regardless of color, and the more
illiterate the greater the amount of superstition, and as a case of
strong evidence of this, I point to the "spirit dance" by the
Indians of the far West, where the excitement created by it has
been so great, that an uprising was only kept down by the
vigilance
of the regular army. While conjuring, tricking and gophering, and
the like, were believed in by the slaves, and spirit dances and
other forms of superstition were practiced by the Indians, the
American white people believed as strongly in another form of
superstition called "witch craft," that they burnt innocent men
and women at the stake.
In order to show that education and intelligence are the
great powers which have been the means of dispelling the gloom
of superstition and voodooism among the Colored people
especially, I will state that the Colored people of Missouri,
particularly those of Chariton, Howard, Carroll and Randolph
counties, were above the ordinary slaves in the more extreme
Southern states in intelligence and education, and did not believe
in voodooism or conjuration nearly as much as those in old
Virginia, and when one was brought to Missouri who claimed to
be able to exercise those miraculous powers, he was
immediately laughed and openly defied by all excepting a few of
the more illiterate. I recall one instance where a man named
Magruder, who owned about forty slaves, which he brought to
Brunswick, Missouri, from Virginia, and bought land near the
town and settled thereon. Among his slaves was an old,
whiteheaded, crippled man, known as a conjuror. He claimed to
be able to do many mysterious and impossible things, and among
those who belonged to his master he was believed and feared,
but the Colored people in that vicinity laughed at him, defied his
threats, and denounced him as an old humbug, for in truth such
he was, and when those who believed in him saw him defied and
denounced, and his inability to carry out his threats, they took
courage and denounced him too. When he saw his business
assailed and himself defied, with no more opportunity to gull the
people, he gave it out that his favorite plants and roots did not
grow or could not be found in that country, and that alone was
the reason why he could not practice his profession. The truth of
the matter was, that the Colored people in that state were more
intelligent than those from whence he came, and therefore
could not be easily humbugged.
After having traveled over the rich lands of the Western
Country, where fine crops were raised without much effort, and
especially without any fertilizer, our master could not be content
to remain in the poor, hilly, rocky state of Virginia, and determined
to go to Mississippi, where his sister, Mrs. Susan Green then
lived. So, about October, 1849, having sold the old farm he started
with his slaves.
On this occasion there was a separation of man
and wife. Eight or ten months previously, my sister Eliza had been
married to a man named Tom, belonging to Nathan Fulks, who
claimed inability to buy my sister, and her owner said he did not
have the cash to spare to buy Tom, but offered to take him
along and pay hire for him, which his master refused, and thus
they were separated forever. She married again after six or
seven years, but I never heard of Tom afterward.
While en route to Mississippi, Uncle Walt, before
mentioned, was taken sick with some kind of a fever and had to
be left for better care and treatment near the line of Virginia and
Tennessee. His wife, Aunt Martha, did not want to be
separated from him and was left, too. I have been informed
recently that they were sold to the man with whom they were
left. I remember when we lived in adjoining cabins that they
were very quarrelsome people, and did not want their son Isaac
to play with me, because, they said, I was a
"yarler nigger." I may have been a bad boy at that time and am
not now prepared to say that I was not, but they used to treat
me meanly in every possible way, and I often sauced them and
ran when they got after me. I remember that I was wicked
enough to be glad when they were left or sold, because they,
particularly Aunt Martha, were always trying to raise trouble
about something.
With one exception our master then owned only my
mother and her children. By the first of December, I849, we had
reached the Greene plantation, located about fifteen miles from
Holly Springs, Mississippi, which was a very large one and tilled
by about three hundred slaves in charge of a very mean
overseer.
The day after our arrival at this place, those old enough to
pick cotton were sent to the field, and this was my first
experience in cotton-picking. We were called up by the
overseer by means of a horn, ate breakfast and were in the field
by daylight, sometimes, before it was light enough to see the
cotton balls, and kept steadily at work till noon, when dinner
was brought to us on large trays and the order given by the
overseer to eat. We sat down right there and as soon as the
last mouthful was swallowed the order was given to go to work.
We were given good, wholesome food and plenty of it, only the
time was so short in which to eat it. From noon until dark we
were driven by the overseer who carried a long whip called a
blacksnake.
At dark, the females were allowed to go to their quarters,
but the men and boys were divided into squads of five; each had
a bale of cotton to turn out. Gins run by mules had been going
all day, making lint cotton which had to be put in bales, and
each bale had
to stand under the press about twenty minutes, so that the last
squad seldom got through earlier than nine o'clock; and this
went on each day except Sunday.
Mr. Greene ran a large cooking establishment, so that
when the work of the day was over supper was ready for all,
and the horn was blown for breakfast an hour before daylight.
We remained here until January 1, 1850, when we were
hired to Thomas Greene, a son of Mr. Greene, living about eight
miles away. We got along without any punishment, while at old
man Greene's plantation, but I saw others whipped. It has
occurred to me since that our owner had something to do with
this, for he was opposed to brutal treatment generally. He had
hired us out for a year, but in March of that year he had become
so dissatisfied with that country that he determined to leave it
and go back to Missouri.
Slave owners, even Mississippians, were not all brutal.
This was especially true of young Thomas Greene and his wife
who were very good people. There was also a man named Cox,
near by, who owned about four hundred slaves whom he treated
very well. He gave them good quarters and built a church on his
place and hired a white preacher to preach the gospel to them
every Sunday, and compelled each slave to attend. He gave each
man the use of an acre of land, and every Saturday afternoon to
cultivate it. One acre, well cultivated, would yield a bale of cotton
which Mr. Cox would sell for them and buy whatever little things
they might want, especially such as were not furnished by him.
Usually this would be nice Sunday clothes, shoes, hats and
Sunday wear for the women. I wish to state that Mr. Cox gave
a half day every Saturday to
all of his slaves, and I state this from personal knowledge,
having visited the Cox plantation many times and played with
the boys and girls thereon.
There was also a large plantation south of the Greene
place, but the owner's name I cannot recall. He owned a large
number of slaves and I was told was kind to them, but I
remember that he allowed no visitors on his place, neither did he
allow any of his slaves to get outside of his fence at any time. He
had some very pretty girls about my age, and we met and talked
with the fence between us, on Sunday afternoon.
A near neighbor's cattle used to break into the field and
destroy corn and other grain on Green's plantation and I had to
drive them out, and in doing so threw a brick which broke the
leg of one of them. The owner of it came over very soon and
wanted to whip me for doing it, and I supposed would have
done so, as he was a very large man, but Mr. Greene came to
my rescue, ordered him off the place and told him, "If you whip
the boy, I will whip you." He left, threatening to whip me the first
time he caught me off Mr. Greene's land. I never went on this
neighbor's land after that.
Having hired us out for a year, our master could not
rightfully claim us until the end of the time specified in the
contract, unless he would give the time we had served from
January to March free, which he agreed to do, and once more
we were in his possession. I am unable to express the joy we
felt when he informed us of his intention to take us back to
Missouri. That was a great blessing to us, and the older ones
thanked the Lord for this deliverance. He came to our quarters
one Sunday afternoon and gave us this very welcome news, and
I remember that we were so
overjoyed that we could not sleep that night. He got started
about April 1, 1850. Having sold his teams when we reached
Mississippi, our owner had to hire Mr. Greene's team to haul us
to Memphis, Tennessee, where we took steamer bound for St.
Louis, and thence to Brunswick, Missouri. The trip was a
pleasant one and made in less than ten days.
There was much rejoicing when we were landed at
Brunswick, and were met at the levee by W. B. Bruce, with a
conveyance to take us out to his plantation, were we met old
acquaintances, including my brother and sister, who also
belonged to him. We were once more in the state we loved
and intent or remaining whether our master liked it or not,
for he had brought us where it was not so easy to take slaves
about without their consent, and besides some had become
men.
I recall that one Sunday, about two years afterwards, our master
sent for the four men of us to meet him at the home of W. B
Bruce. We did so and he informed us that he had about made
up his mind to take us all to Texas. My older brothers, James
and Calvin, told him they would not go and I joined in. He got
angry and ordered us to "shut up," which we did. He then told
us to come back next Sunday, when he would tell us what to
depend on, which was done and then, after seeing how bitterly
his plans were opposed by us he informed us that he would buy
land and settle in that country, which he did within two years.
After resting a few days upon our arrival at Mr. Bruce's
from Mississippi, we were all hired to one J. B. Barrett, a
tobacconist. My sisters were hired out as house girls and
mother as cook to a man named
Treadway, a school teacher who was a mean man, not only to
her, but to his wife as well. I don't think he ever struck my
mother, but he abused her in every other way possible His wife
was a good woman and treated mother humanely, but old
Treadway was so mean that he would not allow any of mother's
children to come to his kitchen to see her at any time, and in
order to see her we used to wait until he was in bed, and then
steal in. I don't think mother stayed there longer than that year.
The next two years she was hired to J. B. Barrett, who
allowed his wife to manage the household affairs to suit herself,
and as she was a very good woman and mother a good cook
they got along splendidly, and Mrs. Barrett was well pleased
with mother's style of cooking.
J. B. Barrett hired six of us for three years, and although he
was a noisy kind of man, cursed a good deal and threatened to
whip or have it done by his overseer, one Jesse Hare, he
seldom punished anyone, especially those who were grown. I
worked for him from June 1850, to January 1, 1854, and was
whipped only once and that for fighting another fellow who had
struck my younger brother, B. K. Bruce. This man, Charles
Sanders, was a grown man at that time and I was an eighteen
year old boy, yet I beat him so badly that he was disabled for
work, at least two months thereafter. Knowing so well what
would follow after this fight, I ran to the woods and made my
way to my owner, about four miles distant. But that did not save
me for the overseer came after me, and after I had made my
statement my owner's answer was, "You knew better than to
fight and you will be whipped, and
I will do nothing to prevent it." I wanted him to pay
my fine and save me. He came to town with me, and
in the presence of J. B. Barrett and himself I was
whipped by old Jesse Hare, who did not like me and
took this opportunity to lay the lash on very hard, but
was promptly stopped by J. B Barrett and severely
reprimanded for his brutality.
This man Hare disliked me any way, because of
an old score, for previous to that he had attempted to
flog me and I resisted, and threatened to go to my
master. But I doubt very much, even now, whether
he would have protected me in such a case, for he was
so bitterly opposed to a slave's resisting or being saucy
to a white man.
After the factory closed in the fall of 1853, I was
hired out by J. B Barrett to a poor white man, named
David Hampton, and had not been with him more than
a month when one of his boys sauced me and I slapped
him. He ran to his father who called me to him,
ordered me to take off my shirt, a thing neither my
master nor any other man had ordered me to do. Of
course I refused to obey and told him so in language
which he understood. He then threw a stick of cordwood
at me which missed its mark, and I pricked it up
and was about to throw it back, when he ran into the
house. This ended our fight. I would be ashamed of
myself, even now, had I allowed that poor white man
to whip me. But the fun came later. When supper
was called, the old man and his wife had eaten and left
the table, and the children, two girls and three small
boys and I ate together. Just as I finished and was
about to leave the table, the old lady came in behind
me with a hickory switch in hand. I could not afford
to resist her, neither could I get out until she had given
me several severe blows. She left her marks on me,
which I carried for several days, and I suppose she was
satisfied; I know I was.
But after all, the Hamptons were very reasonable
people and I was well pleased with them, and often
visited them afterward. While they were poor people
they were not the typical poor whites. Many of the
parties mentioned are living and can take me to task if
I misrepresent facts; but I have stated the truth in
every particular, as I saw and experienced it.
There was a trait of character running through
my mother's family, a desire to learn, and every member
could read very well when the war broke out, and
some could write. The older ones would teach the
younger, and while mother had no education at all, she
used to make the younger study the lessons given by
the older sister or brother, and in that way they all
learned to read. Another advantage we enjoyed was
this: we were all hired to the same man and we
worked and slept together in the same factory where,
by hard work, we usually made some little money
every week, which we could spend for whatever suited
our fancy.
The men who hired slaves, and owners as well,
had to feed and clothe them, and the slaves had no care
as to those necessaries. Slavery in some portions of
Missouri was not what it was in Virginia, or in the
extreme South, because we could buy any book wanted
if we had the money to pay for it, and masters seemed
not to care about it, especially ours, but of course there
were exceptions to the rule.
But, returning to my life in the tobacco factory, I
must state that when we were hired out our owner
notified the hirer that he did not whip any of his grown
slaves, and would not allow it to be done by anyone
else, and when the man who hired them found that he
could not get along without punishing he should return
them to him. That was the saving clause for us, but we
did not take advantage of this to shirk or play; as proof
of this I will state that there are men now living in
Brunswick, who will bear testimony to the fact that the
"Bruce hands," as we were called, brought the highest
prices. Our master received from two hundred and
fifty to three hundred dollars a year for each man or
boy over seventeen years old, the hirer to feed and
clothe us, etc.
When the factory closed in September, 1854, I was
hired to Charles Cabel, a farmer, recently from Louisiana,
living about four miles from town and who owned
twenty-five or thirty slaves, and was reported to be a
very hard master I had been used to good fare, and
that prepared and served clean and nice, but here the
meals were served in such unclean vessels, while they
may have been wholesome, I could not and would not
eat them. W. B. Bruce lived only a mile away, and I
went there to supper, stayed all night, took my breakfast
and dinner with me to work.
In a few days Mrs. Susan Cabel found this out and
sent for me; I explain, and she said that her Negroes
were so very dirty that she did not blame me, and from
that date she sent my meals from her table, which came
in nice clean dishes and in abundance. She was a good
mistress as far as I knew.
Mr. Cabel had a very large number of lazy slaves
and often inflicted punishment when, in my opinion, it
might have been avoided. After I had been at his
place about ten days he sent me with another fellow
named Ike to split rails in a large body of timber north
of his house. We had been at this work but a very
short time, when I discovered Ike to be a lazy man. I
had never been thrashed on account of laziness and did
not want to chance it at that time, knowing the reputation
of Mr. Cabel as a hard master. I had never split
rails before and was put under Ike for training, and of
course had to do as he directed. He was a great
storyteller and would often stop to tell a story. I urged him
to work but could not keep him at it over ten minutes
at a time.
One day when we had cut off a log and I had
commenced to split it, while Ike was sitting in the
shade, I called on him to come and help me turn the
log over, which he failed to do, and I went on working
it alone. Mr. Cabel who had been watching near by
and had heard all that was said came up, as if by
magic, gun in hand, which he set by a stump, took out
his knife, cut a hickory switch and ordered Ike to take
off his shirt. Ike begged in vain, but he gave him
thirty or more lashes on the bare back. During this
exciting time I was scared almost to death, thinking my
time would come next. I was tempted to break and
run to my master but knowing I had done my duty I
concluded not to do so until I was called to take my
share of this thrashing. I had determined to run if
called and take chances on being shot, for I could not
and would not stand such punishment as was given Ike.
When he had finished whipping Ike he said, "Henry
will work if you will let him; I have been listening to
you for an hour." I can never express the relief those
words gave me, for I did not want to be forced to resist
and would not submit to any kind of corporal punishment,
and was glad that I did not run while Ike was
being punished. I served out my term with Mr. Cabel,
which ended December 25, 1854, without even being
scolded. Ike and I were separated after the
above-mentioned incident, fully half a mile, and I was given a
task which I performed easily every day. I shall speak
of Mr. Cabel again later on.
On January 1, 1855, with three younger brothers, I
was hired to Mr. Beasley, who owned a large tobacco
factory and worked about eighty hands, mostly hired. I
did not want to go there and told my master so in the
presence of Mr. Beasley, who asked the reasons why.
I told him that I had heard that he was a hard man to
please. My master remained silent during this conversation
and finally Beasley and I came to terms, he
assuring me that if we worked for him as he had been
informed we did for Mr. Barrett, we would have no
trouble. After it was arranged my master took me
aside and severely scolded me for speaking so harshly
to Mr. Beasley. I took it easy for I never sauced him
at any time. But that was my opportunity to make
easy sailing that year with Beasley.
The overseer at this factory was named Tom
Black, who was really a much better man than old
Jesse Hare, and if one would do his work faithfully
would have no trouble with Mr. Black. He and I
became fast friends and I had an easy time, but I always
did my work well. Beasley gave an order that for
men were to come to his residence after the factory
closed, at sunset each day to cut or saw wood. When
my time came I refused to go. He was informed of the
fact and said he was going to have Tom Black whip me
the next day, which was Saturday; in fact he told him
in my presence to do it on Monday morning. But previous
to this he called me up to know why I disobeyed
his order. I told him that I was not hired for that purpose.
Oh, but how he did cut up, yet he did not attempt to strike me.
Before going home to my master, which I certainly
should have done, I thought it best to use a little strategy.
During Sunday I had a talk with Mr. Black in
which I told him my plans. He advised me not to go,
and said that unless ordered again he would not
attempt to whip me, and even then he would give me
plenty of chance to run; but he said he would go and
see Mr. Beasley that day. Now what passed between
them I am unable to state, but when Mr. Black
returned he said it was all right, and it was, for I was
never molested after that, and Mr. Beasley revoked the
order and had two men detailed to saw wood about
four o'clock e
CHAPTER I.
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
CHAPTER II.
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
CHAPTER III.
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
CHAPTER IV.
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
CHAPTER V.
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
CHAPTER VI.
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71