<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite.dtd" [
<!ENTITY % external-entities SYSTEM "./extEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY % internal-entities SYSTEM "./intEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY egglestontp SYSTEM "egglestontp.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
]>
<TEI.2>
  <teiHeader type="" status="new">
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>A Rebel's Recollections: Electronic Edition</title>
        <author>Eggleston,
George Cary, 1839-1911</author>
        <funder>Funding from the Library of Congress/Ameritech National Digital
Library Competition  supported the electronic publication of this
title.</funder>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text scanned (OCR) by</resp>
          <name id="cg">Christopher Gwyn</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
          <name id="ns">Don Sechler  and Natalia Smith</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <editionStmt>
        <edition>First edition, <date>1997.</date></edition>
      </editionStmt>
      <extent>ca. 650K</extent>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>Academic Affairs Library, UNC-CH</publisher>
        <pubPlace>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, </pubPlace>
        <date>1997.</date>
        <availability status="unknown">
          <p>This work is the property of the University of North
Carolina
at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research,
teaching and personal use as long as this statement of availability
is included in the text.</p>
        </availability>
      </publicationStmt>
      <notesStmt>
        <note anchored="yes">Call number  E487 .E32 1875
(Davis Library, UNC-CH)</note>
      </notesStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>A Rebel's Recollections</title>
          <author>Eggleston, George Cary,
1839-1911</author>
          <imprint>
            <pubPlace>New York </pubPlace>
            <publisher>Hurd and Houghton</publisher>
            <publisher>Cambridge: The Riverside Press</publisher>
            <date>1875</date>
          </imprint>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <projectDesc>
        <p>The electronic edition is a part of
the UNC-CH
digitization project, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South, or,  The Southern Experience in 
19th-century America.</hi></p>
      </projectDesc>
      <editorialDecl>
        <p>Any hyphens occurring in line breaks have been
removed, and the trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding
line.</p>
        <p>All quotation marks and ampersand have been transcribed as
entity references.</p>
        <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as ”
and “
respectively.</p>
        <p>Indentation in lines has not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Running titles have not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Spell-check and verification made against printed text using
Author/Editor (SoftQuad) and Microsoft Word spell check programs.</p>
      </editorialDecl>
      <classDecl>
        <taxonomy id="lcsh">
          <bibl>
            <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings,</title>
            <edition>21st edition, 1998</edition>
          </bibl>
        </taxonomy>
      </classDecl>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <langUsage>
        <language id="eng">English</language>
      </langUsage>
      <textClass>
        <keywords scheme="lcsh">
          <list type="simple">
            <item>Eggleston, George Cary, 1839-1911.</item>
            <item>Virginia -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Personal
narratives.</item>
            <item>Virginia -- Social life and customs.</item>
            <item>Southern States -- Social life and customs.</item>
            <item>Confederate States of America. Army -- Military life.</item>
            <item>Confederate States of America -- History.</item>
            <item>United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Personal
narratives, Confederate.</item>
            <item>United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Women.</item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change>
        <date>1998-01-09, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Natalia Smith, </name>
          <resp>project manager, </resp>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished TEI-conformant
encoding and final proofing.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1997-12-30, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Don Sechler </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished TEI/SGML encoding</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1997-09-10, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Christopher Gwyn </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished scanning (OCR) and proofing.</item>
      </change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <front>
      <div1 type="title page image">
        <p>
          <figure id="title" entity="egglestontp">
            <p>[Title Page Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <titlePage>
        <docTitle>
          <titlePart type="main">A
REBEL'S RECOLLECTIONS</titlePart>
        </docTitle>
        <byline>BY</byline>
        <docAuthor>GEORGE CARY EGGLESTON<lb/>
AUTHOR OF “A MAN OF HONOR”</docAuthor>
        <docImprint><pubPlace>NEW YORK</pubPlace>
<publisher>PUBLISHED BY  HURD AND HOUGHTON</publisher>
<publisher>Cambridge: The Riverside Press.</publisher>
<docDate>1875</docDate></docImprint>
        <titlePart type="verso">Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1874, by<lb/>
GEORGE CARY EGGLESTON<lb/>
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.</titlePart>
        <titlePart type="verso">RIVERSIDE, CAMBRIDGE:<lb/>
STEREOTYPED AND PRINTED BY
<lb/>H. O. HOUGHTON AND COMPANY.</titlePart>
      </titlePage>
      <div1 type="dedication">
        <head>DEDICATION.</head>
        <p>I WISH to dedicate this book to my brother,
EDWARD EGGLESTON; and even if there were
no motives of affection impelling me thereto, I
should still feel bound to inscribe his name
upon this page, as an act of justice, in order
that those critics who confounded me with him,
when I put forth a little novel a year ago, may
have no chance to hold him responsible for my
political as they did for my literary sins.</p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="preface">
        <head>PREFACE.</head>
        <p>LUNCHING one day with Oliver Johnson, the
best “original abolitionist” I ever knew, I
submitted to him the question I was debating
with myself, namely, whether I might write this
little volume of reminiscences without fear of
offending excellent people, or, still worse,
reanimating prejudices that happily were dying.
His reply was, “Write, by all means. Prejudice is
the first-born of ignorance, and it never outlives
its father. The only thing necessary now to the
final burial of the animosity existing between the
sections is that the North and the South
shall learn to know and understand each
other. Anything which contributes to this
hastens the day of peace and harmony and
brotherly love which every good man longs
for.”</p>
        <pb id="egglestonvi" n="vi"/>
        <p>Upon this hint I have written, and if the
reading of these pages shall serve, in never
so small a degree, to strengthen the kindly
feelings which have grown up of late between
the foemen of ten years ago, I shall
think my labor well expended.</p>
        <p>I have written chiefly of the things I saw for
myself, and yet this is in no sense the story of
my personal adventures. I never wore a star on
my collar, and every reader of military novels
knows that adventures worth writing about
never befall a soldier below the rank of major.</p>
        <closer><signed><name>G. C. E.</name></signed>
<dateline><date><hi rend="italics">October</hi>, 1874.</date></dateline></closer>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="table of contents">
        <head>CONTENTS.</head>
        <list type="simple">
          <item>I. THE MUSTERING . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" id="ref1" n="1" target="eggleston1">1</ref></item>
          <item>II. THE MEN WHO MADE THE ARMY . . . . .  <ref targOrder="U" id="ref2" n="2" target="eggleston29">29</ref></item>
          <item>III. THE TEMPER OF THE WOMEN . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" id="ref3" n="3" target="eggleston56">56</ref></item>
          <item>IV. OF THE TIME WHEN MONEY WAS “EASY” . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" id="ref4" n="4" target="eggleston77">77</ref></item>
          <item>V. THE CHEVALIER OF THE LOST CAUSE . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" id="ref5" n="5" target="eggleston108">108</ref></item>
          <item>VI. LEE, JACKSON, AND SOME LESSER WORTHIES . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" id="ref6" n="6" target="eggleston138">138</ref></item>
          <item>VII. SOME QUEER PEOPLE . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" id="ref7" n="7" target="eggleston169">169</ref></item>
          <item>VIII. RED TAPE . . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" id="ref8" n="8" target="eggleston193">193</ref></item>
          <item>IX. THE END, AND AFTER . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" id="ref9" n="9" target="eggleston229">229</ref></item>
        </list>
      </div1>
    </front>
    <body>
      <pb id="eggleston1" n="1"/>
      <div1>
        <head>A REBEL'S RECOLLECTIONS.</head>
        <div2 type="chapter">
          <head>CHAPTER I.<lb/>THE MUSTERING,</head>
          <p>THAT was an admirable idea of De Quincey's,
formally to postulate any startling
theory upon which he desired to build an
argument or a story, and to insist that his
readers should regard the postulate as
proved, on pain of losing altogether what he
had to say. The plan is a very convenient
one, saving a deal of argument, and
establishing in the outset a very desirable
relation of mastery and subordination
between writer and reader. Indeed, but for
some such device I should never be able to
get on at all with these sketches, fully to
understand which, the reader must make of
himself, for the time at least, a Confederate.
<pb id="eggleston2" n="2"/>
He must put himself in the place of the
Southerners and look at some things through
their eyes, if he would understand those
things and their results at all; and as it is no
part of my purpose to write a defense of the
Southern view of any question, it will save a
good deal of explanation on my part, and
weariness on the part of the reader, if I
follow De Quincey's example and do a little
postulating to begin with. I shall make no
attempt whatever to prove my postulates,
but any one interested in these pages will
find it to his advantage to accept them, one
and all, as proved, pending the reading of
what is to follow. After that he may relapse
as speedily as he pleases into his own
opinions. Here are the postulates:  -  </p>
          <p>I. The Southerners honestly believed in
the right of secession, not merely as a
revolutionary, but as a constitutional right.
They not only held that whenever any people
finds the government under which it is
<pb id="eggleston3" n="3"/>
living oppressive and subversive of the ends
for which it was instituted, it is both the
right and the duty of that people to throw
off the government and establish a new one
in its stead; but they believed also that every
State in the Union held the reserved right,
under the constitution, to withdraw
peaceably from the Union at pleasure.</p>
          <p>2. They believed that every man's
allegiance was due to his State only, and
that it was only by virtue of the State's
continuance in the Union that any
allegiance was due to the general
government at all; wherefore the withdrawal
of a State from the Union would of itself
absolve all the citizens of that State from
whatever obligations they were under to
maintain and respect the Federal constitution.
In other words, patriotism, as the South
understood it, meant devotion to one's State,
and only a secondary and consequential
devotion to the Union, existing as a result of
the State's action in making itself a part of the Union,
<pb id="eggleston4" n="4"/>
and terminable at any time by the State's withdrawal.</p>
          <p>3. They were as truly and purely patriotic
in their secession and in the fighting which
followed, as were the people of the North in
their adherence to the Union itself. The
difference was one of opinion as to what
the duties of a patriot were, and not at all
a difference in the degree of patriotism
existing in the two sections.</p>
          <p>4. You, reader, who shouldered your
musket and fought like the hero you are, for
the Union and the old flag, if you had been
bred at the South, and had understood your
duty as the Southerners did theirs, would
have fought quite as bravely for secession
as you did against it; and you would have
been quite as truly a hero in the one case as
in the other, because in either you would
have risked your life for the sake of that
which you held to be the right. If the reader
will bear all this in mind we shall get on
much better than we
<pb id="eggleston5" n="5"/>
otherwise could, in our effort to catch a
glimpse of the war from a Southern point
of view.</p>
          <p>With all its horrors and in spite of the
wretchedness it has wrought, this war of
ours, in some of its aspects at least, begins
to look like a very ridiculous affair, now
that we are getting too far away from it to
hear the rattle of the musketry; and I have a
mind, in this chapter, to review one of its most
ridiculous phases, to wit, its beginning. We all
remember Mr. Webster's pithy putting of
the case with regard to our forefathers of a
hundred years ago: “They went to war
against a preamble. They fought seven
years against a declaration. They poured out
their treasures and their blood like water, in
a contest in opposition to an assertion.” Now
it seems to me that something very much
like this might be said of the Southerners,
and particularly of the Virginians, without
whose pluck and pith there could have
been no war at all
<pb id="eggleston6" n="6"/>
worth writing or talking about. They made
war upon a catch-word, and fought until they
were hopelessly ruined for the sake of an
abstraction. And certainly history will not find
it to the discredit of those people that they
freely offered themselves upon the altar of an
abstract principle of right, in a war which they
knew must work hopeless ruin to themselves,
whatever its other results might be. Virginia
did not want to secede, and her decision to this
effect was given in the election of a convention
composed for the most part of men strongly
opposed to secession. The Virginians
believed they had both a moral and a
constitutional right to withdraw voluntarily
from a Union into which they had voluntarily
gone, but the majority of them preferred to
remain as they were. They did not feel
themselves particularly aggrieved or
threatened by the election of Mr. Lincoln, and
so, while they never doubted that they had an
unquestionable right to secede at will, they
<pb id="eggleston7" n="7"/>
decided by their votes not to do anything of
the kind. This decision was given in the most
unmistakable way, by heavy majorities, in
an election which involved no other issue
whatever. But without Virginia the States
which had already passed ordinances of
secession would have been wholly unable to
sustain themselves. Virginia's strength in
men, material, and geographical position
was very necessary, for one thing, and her
moral influence on North Carolina,
Arkansas, and other hesitating States, was
even more essential to the success of the
movement. Accordingly every possible
effort was made to “fire the heart” of the
conservative old commonwealth. Delegations,
with ponderous stump speeches in their mouths
and parchment appeals in their hands, were
sent from the seceding States to Richmond,
while every Virginian who actively favored
secession was constituted a committee of one
to cultivate a public sentiment in favor of the
movement.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston8" n="8"/>
          <p>Then came such a deluge of stump
speeches as would have been impossible in
any other state or country in the civilized
world, for there never yet was a Virginian
who could not, on occasion, acquit himself
very well on the hustings. The process of
getting up the requisite amount of
enthusiasm, in the country districts
especially, was in many cases a very
laughable one. In one county, I remember,
the principal speakers were three lawyers of
no very great weight except in a time of
excitement. One of them was colonel of
the county militia, another lieutenant-colonel,
and the third captain of a troop of volunteer
cavalry, a fine body of men, who spent three
or four days of each month partly in practicing
a system of drill which, I am persuaded, is as yet
wholly undreamed of by any of the writers upon
tactics, and partly in cultivating the social virtues
over that peculiar species of feast known as a
barbecue. When it became evident that the
people of Virginia
<pb id="eggleston9" n="9"/>
were not duly impressed with the
wrong done them in the election of Mr.
Lincoln, these were unquestionably the
right men in the right places. They were
especially fond of fervid speech-making,
and not one of them had ever been known
to neglect an opportunity to practice it;
each could make a speech on any subject at
a moment's warning. They spoke quite as
well on a poor theme as on a good one,
and it was even claimed for one of them
that his eloquence waxed hottest when he
had no subject at all to talk about. Here,
then, was their opportunity. The ever-full
vials of their eloquence waited only for the
uncorking. It was the rule of their lives to
make a speech wherever and whenever
they could get an audience, and under the
militia law they could, at will, compel the
attendance of a body of listeners consisting
of pretty nearly all the voters of the county,
plus the small boys. When they were big with
speech they had only to order a drill. If a
<pb id="eggleston10" n="10"/>
new gush of words or a felicitous illustrations 
occurred to them overnight, they called a general
muster for the next day. Two of them were candidates,
against a quiet and sensible planter, for the one seat
allowed the county in the convention, and the only
difference of opinion there was between them 
was involved in the question whether the ordinance of
secession should be adopted <hi rend="italics">before or after</hi>
breakfast on the morning of the first day of the
convention's existence. One wanted coffee first and
the other did not. On the day of election, a drunken
fellow, without a thought of saying a good thing,
apologized to one of them for not having voted for him,
saying, “I promised you, Sam,  -  but I couldn't do it.
You're a good fellow, Sam, and smart at a speech;
but you see, Sam, you <hi rend="italics">haven't the weight o' head</hi>.” The people, as the result of the election showed,
entertained a like view of the matter, and the
lawyers were both beaten by the old planter.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston11" n="11"/>
          <p>It was not until after the convention assembled,
however, that the eloquence of the triad came into full
play. They then labored unceasingly to find words with
which to express their humiliation in view of the
degeneracy and cowardice of the ancient commonwealth.</p>
          <p>They rejoiced in the thought that sooner or later
the People  -  which they always pronounced with an
uncommonly big P  -   would “hurl those degenerate
sons of illustrious sires,” meaning thereby the gentlemen
who had been elected to the convention, “from the seats
which they were now polluting,” and a good deal more
of a similar sort, the point of which was that these
orators longed for war of the bloodiest kind, and were
happy in the belief that it would come, in spite of the fact
that the convention was overwhelmingly against secession.</p>
          <p>Now, in view of the subsequent history of these
belligerent orators, it would be a very interesting thing to
know just what
<pb id="eggleston12" n="12"/>
they thought a war between the sections
promised. One of them, as I have said, was
colonel of the two or three hundred militia-men
mustered in the county. Another was
lieutenant-colonel, and the third was captain
of a volunteer troop, organized under the
militia law for purposes of amusement, chiefly.
This last one could, of course, retain
his rank, should his company be mustered
into service, and the other two firmly
believed that they would be called into camp
as full-fledged field-officers. In view of this,
the colonel, in one of his speeches, urged upon
his men the necessity of a rigid self-examination,
touching the matter of personal courage, before
going, in his regiment, to the battle-field; “For,”
said he, “where G. leads, brave men must follow,”
a bit of rhetoric which brought down the house as
a matter of course. The others were equally valiant
in anticipation of war and equally eager for its
coming; and yet when the war did come, so
<pb id="eggleston13" n="13"/>
sorely taxing the resources of the South as
to make a levy <hi rend="italics">en masse</hi> necessary, not one
of the three ever managed to hear the whistle
of a bullet. The colonel did indeed go as far
as Richmond, during the spring of 1861 but
discovering there that he was physically
unfit for service, went no farther. The
lieutenant-colonel ran away from the field
while the battle was yet afar off, and, the
captain, suffering from “nervous prostration,”
sent in his resignation, which was unanimously
accepted by his men, on the field during the
first battle of Bull Run.</p>
          <p>I sketch these three men and their military
careers not without a purpose. They serve
to correct an error. They were types of a
class which brought upon the South a
deal of odium. Noisy speech-makers, they
were too often believed by strangers to be,
as they pretended, representative men,
and their bragging, their intolerance,
their contempt for the North, their arrogance,
   -  all these were commonly laid to the charge of
<pb id="eggleston14" n="14"/>
the Southern people as a whole. As a
matter of fact, these were not representative
men at all. They assumed the <hi rend="italics">rôle</hi> of
leadership on the court-house greens, but
were repudiated by the people at the polls
first, and afterwards when the volunteers
were choosing officers to command them in
actual warfare. These men were clamorous
demagogues and nothing else. They had no
influence whatever upon the real people. Their
vaporings were applauded and laughed at.
The applause was ridicule, and the laughter
was closely akin to jeering.</p>
          <p>Meantime a terrible dread was brooding
over the minds of the Virginian people.
They were brave men and patriots, who
would maintain their honor at any cost.
They were ready to sacrifice their lives and
their treasures in a hopeless struggle about
an abstraction, should the time come when
their sense of right and honor required the
sacrifice at their hands. There was no
cowardice and no hesitation to be expected
<pb id="eggleston15" n="15"/>
of them when the call should come. But
they dreaded war, and most of them prayed
that it might never be. They saw only
desolation in its face. They knew it would
lay waste their fields and bring want upon
their families, however it might result in
regard to the great political questions
involved in it. And so they refused to go
headlong into a war which meant for them
destruction. Some of them, believing that
there was no possibility of avoiding the
struggle, thought it the part of wisdom to
accept the inevitable and begin hostilities at
once, while the North was still but poorly
prepared for aggressive measures. But the
majority of the Virginians were disposed to
wait and to avoid war altogether, if that
should prove possible. These said, “We
should remain quiet until some overt act of
hostility shall make resistance necessary.”
And these were called cowards and fogies
by the brave men of the hustings already
alluded to.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston16" n="16"/>
          <p>There was still another class of men who
were opposed to secession in any case. Of
these, William C. Wickham, of Hanover, and
Jubal Early will serve as examples. They
thought secession unnecessary and
imprudent in any conceivable event. They
believed that it offered no remedy for
existing or possible ills, and that it could
result only in the prostration of the South.
They opposed it, therefore, with all their
might; not only as not yet called for, but as
suicidal in any event, and not to be thought of
at all. And yet these men, when the war
came, believed it to be their duty to side with
their State, and fought so manfully in behalf
of the South as to make themselves famous
military leaders.</p>
          <p>Why, then, the reader doubtless asks, if
this was the temper of the Virginians, did
Virginia secede after all? I answer, because
circumstances ultimately so placed the
Virginians that they could not, without
cowardice and dishonor, do otherwise; and
<pb id="eggleston17" n="17"/>
the Virginians are brave men and honorable
ones. They believed, as I have said, in the
abstract right of any State to secede at will.
Indeed, this right was to them as wholly
unquestioned and unquestionable as is the
right of the States to establish free schools,
or to do any other thing pertaining to local
self-government. The question of the correctness
or incorrectness of the doctrine is not now to
the purpose. The Virginians, almost without
an exception, believed and had always
believed it absolutely, and believing it, they
held of necessity that the general government
had no right, legal or moral, to coerce a
seceding State; and so, when the President
called upon Virginia for her quota of troops
with which to compel the return of the seceding
States, she could not possibly obey
without doing that which her people believed
to be an outrage upon the rights of
sister commonwealths, for which, as they
held, there was no warrant in law or equity.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston18" n="18"/>
          <p>She heartily condemned the secession
of South Carolina and the rest as unnecessary,
ill-advised, and dangerous; but their secession
did not concern her except as a looker-on, and
she had not only refused to be a partaker in it,
but had also felt a good deal of indignation
against the men who were thus endangering
the peace of the land. When she was called
upon to assist in reducing these States to
submission, however, she could no longer
remain a spectator. She must furnish the troops,
and so assist in doing that which she
believed to be utterly wrong, or she must
herself withdraw from the Union. The
question was thus narrowed down to this:
Should Virginia seek safety in dishonor, or
should she meet destruction in doing that
which she believed to be right? Such a
question was not long to be debated. Two
days after the proclamation was published
Virginia seceded, not because she wanted to
secede,  -  not because she believed it
wise,   -  but
<pb id="eggleston19" n="19"/>because, as she understood the matter, the
only other course open to her would have
been cowardly and dishonorable.</p>
          <p>Now, unless I am sadly mistaken, the
Virginians understood what secession implied
much more perfectly than did the rest of the
Southern people. They anticipated no child's
play, and having cast in their lot with the
South, they began at once to get ready for war.
From one end of the State to the other, every
county seat became a drill field. The courts
suspended their sessions, on the ground that it
was not a proper time for the enforced collection
of debts. Volunteer companies soon drained the
militia organization of its men. Public opinion
said that every man who did not embrace the
very surest and earliest opportunity of getting
himself mustered into actual service was a
coward; and so, to withdraw from the militia and
join a volunteer company, and make a formal tender of
services to the State, became absolutely essential
<pb id="eggleston20" n="20"/>
to the maintenance of one's reputation as a gentleman.</p>
          <p>The drilling, of which there was literally
no end, was simply funny. Maneuvers of
the most utterly impossible sort were
carefully taught to the men. Every amateur
officer had his own pet system of tactics,
and the effect of the incongruous teachings,
when brought out in battalion drill, closely
resembled that of the music at Mr. Bob
Sawyer's party, where each guest sang
the chorus to the tune he knew best.</p>
          <p>The militia colonels, having assumed a
sort of general authority over the volunteer
companies which had been formed out of
the old militia material, were not satisfied
with daily musterings of the men under their
captains,   -  musterings which left the
field-officers nothing to do,   -  and so in a good
many of the counties they ordered all the
men into camp at the county seat, and drew
upon the people for provisions with which to
feed them. The camps were
<pb id="eggleston21" n="21"/>
irregular, disorderly affairs, over which no
rod of discipline could very well be held, as the
men were not legally soldiers, and the only
punishment possible for disobedience or
neglect of duty was a small fine, which the
willful men, with true Virginian contempt for
money in small sums, paid cheerfully as a tax
upon jollity.</p>
          <p>The camping, however, was enjoyable in
itself, and as most of the men had nothing
else to do, the attendance upon roll-call was a
pretty full one. Every man brought a servant or
two with him, of course. How else were his
boots and his accouterments to be kept
clean, his horse to be groomed, and his meals
cooked? Most of the ladies came, too, in their
carriages every morning, returning to their
homes only as night came on; and so the
camps were very picturesque and very
delightful places to be in. All the men wore
epaulets of a gorgeousness rarely equaled
except in portraits of field-marshals, and every
man was a hero in immediate prospect.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston22" n="22"/>
          <p>One day an alarming report came, to the
effect that a little transport steamer, well
known in James River, was on her way up
to Richmond with ten thousand troops on
board, and instantly the camps at the
courthouses along the railroads were astir.
It entered into nobody's head to inquire
where so many troops could have come
from at a time when the entire active force
of the United States army from Maine to
Oregon was hardly greater than that; nor
did anybody seem surprised that the
whole ten thousand had managed to
bestow themselves on board a steamer the
carrying capacity of which had hitherto
been about four or five hundred men. The
report was accepted as true, and everybody
believed that the ten thousand men would be
poured into Richmond's defenseless streets
within an hour or two. In the particular
county to which I have alluded in the beginning
of this chapter, the cavalry captain sent for
half a dozen grindstones, and set his men
<pb id="eggleston23" n="23"/>
to grinding their sabres,  -  a process which
utterly ruined the blades, of course. The
militia colonel telegraphed a stump speech
or two to Richmond, which did no particular
harm, as the old station agent who officiated
as operator could not for his life send a
message of more than three words so that it
could be read at the other end of the line. A
little telegraphic swearing came back over
the wires, but beyond that the colonel's
glowing messages resulted in nothing.
Turning his attention to matters more
immediately within his control, therefore, he
ordered the drums to beat, and assembling the
men he marched them boldly down to the railroad
station, where mounting a goods box he told them
that the time for speech-making was now past; that
the enemy (I am not sure that he did not say “vandal,”
and make some parenthetical remarks about “Attila flags”
and things of that sort which were favorites with him) was
now at our very thresholds; that he
<pb id="eggleston24" n="24"/>
(the colonel) had marched his command to
the depot in answer to the call of his
country; that they would proceed thence by
rail to Richmond and at once encounter the
enemy, etc., etc., etc. He had already
telegraphed, he said, to General Lee and to
Governor Letcher, requesting them to
dispatch a train (the colonel would have
scorned to say “send cars” even in a
telegram), and the iron horse was doubtless
already on its way.</p>
          <p>No train came, however, and after
nightfall the men were marched back to
their quarters in the court-house.</p>
          <p>A few days later some genuine orders
came from Richmond, accepting the
proffered services of all the companies
organized in the county, and ordering all,
except the one cavalry troop, into camp at
Richmond. These orders, by some strange
oversight, the colonel explained, were
addressed, not to him as colonel, but to the
several captains individually. He was not
<pb id="eggleston25" n="25"/>
disposed to stand on ceremony, however, he
said; and so, without waiting for the clerical
error to be rectified, he would comply with
the spirit of the order, and take the troops to
Richmond as soon as the necessary
transportation should arrive. Transportation
was a good, mouth-filling word, which
suited the colonel exactly. In order that
there should be no delay or miscarriage, he
marched the men a hundred yards
down the hill to the station, ten hours in
advance of the time at which the cars were
to be there; and as there was nothing else
to do, he and his lieutenant thought the
occasion a good one for the making of a
speech apiece. The colonel expressed his
hearty sympathy with the woes of the cavalry,
who were to be left at home, while the
infantry was winning renown. And yet, he
said, he had expected this from the first.
The time had been, he explained, when the
cavalry was the quick-moving arm of the
service, but now that the iron horse  -  The
<pb id="eggleston26" n="26"/>
reader must imagine the rest of that
grandiloquent sentence. I value my
reputation for veracity too much to risk it by
following the colonel in this, his supreme
burst of impassioned oratory. He was sorry
for the cavalry, but they should console
themselves with the thought that, as
preservers of order in the community and
protectors of their homes, they would not be
wholly useless in their own humble way; and
should any of them visit the army, they
would always meet a hearty welcome in his
camp. For the present his head-quarters
would be in the Spottswood Hotel, and he
would be glad, whenever military duty did
not too greatly absorb his attention, to
grasp the hand of any member of the troop
who, wishing to catch a glimpse of real
warfare, should seek him there.</p>
          <p>The train came, after a while, and the
unappreciative railroad men obstinately
insisted that the State paid for the passage
of certain designated companies only, and
<pb id="eggleston27" n="27"/>
that these distinguished field-officers, if they
traveled by that train at all, must pay their
way at regular passenger rates. The colonel
and his lieutenant pocketed the insult and
paid their fare; but when, upon the arrival of
the troops at Richmond, nobody seemed to
know anything about these field-officers, and
the companies were sent, without them, into
camps of instruction, the gallant leaders
returned by passenger train to their homes.
The colonel came back, he said in a speech
at the station, still further to stir the
patriotism of the people. He had been in
consultation with the authorities in
Richmond; and while it would not be
proper for him to reveal even to these, his
patriotic countrymen, the full plan of
campaign confided to him as a field-officer,
he might at least say to them that the
government, within ten days, would have
fifteen thousand men in line on the Potomac,
and then, with perchance a bloody but very
brief struggle, this overwhelming force
<pb id="eggleston28" n="28"/>
would dictate terms to the tyrants at
Washington.</p>
          <p>This time the colonel got himself
unmistakably laughed at, and, so far as I
have heard, he made no more speeches.</p>
          <p>Meantime it had become evident to
everybody that a very real and a very
terrible war was in prospect, and there was
no longer any disposition to tolerate
nonsense of the sort I have been describing.
As fast as arrangements could be made for
their accommodation, the volunteers from
every part of the State were ordered into
camps of instruction at Richmond and
Ashland. As soon as any company was deemed
fit for service, it was sent to the front and assigned
to a regiment. Troops from other States were
constantly pouring into Richmond, and marching
thence to the armies which were forming in the
field. The speech-making was over forever,
and the work of the war had begun.</p>
        </div2>
        <pb id="eggleston29" n="29"/>
        <div2>
          <head>CHAPTER II.<lb/>THE MEN WHO MADE THE ARMY.</head>
          <p>A NEWSPAPER correspondent has told us
that the great leader of the German armies,
Count Von Moltke, has never read anything
  -  even a history  -  of our war, and that
when questioned on the subject, he has said
he could not afford to spend time over “the
wrangling of two armed mobs.” If he ever
said anything of the kind, which is doubtful,
his characterization of the two armies had
reference, probably, to their condition during
the first year or two of the struggle, when
they could lay very little claim indeed to any
more distinctively military title. The Southern
army, at any rate, was simply a vast mob of
rather ill-armed young gentlemen from the
country.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref10" n="10" rend="sc" target="note10">1 </ref>As I have said
<note id="note10" n="10" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref10">1.  In order that no reader may misconceive the spirit 
in which this chapter is written, I wish to say, at the outset, that in
commenting upon the material of which the Southern army was
made up, nothing has been further from my thought than to reflect,
even by implication, upon the character of the Union army or of
the men who composed it, for indeed I honor both as highly as
anybody can. I think I have outlived whatever war prejudices I may
have brought with me out of the struggle, and in writing of some of
the better characteristics of the early Virginian volunteers, I
certainly have not meant to deny equal or like excellence to their
foemen. I happen, however, to know a great deal about the one army
and very little about the other,  -  a state of things consequent upon
the peculiar warmth with which we were always greeted whenever
we undertook to visit the camps of our friends on the other side.
Will the reader please bear in mind, then, that my estimate of the
character of the Southern troops is a positive and not a comparative
one, and that nothing said in praise of the one army is meant to be a
reflection upon the other? Between Bull Run and Appomattox  I
had ample opportunity to learn respect for the courage and
manliness of the men who overcame us, and since the close of the
war I have learned to know many of them as tried and true friends,
and gentlemen of noblest mold.</note>
<pb id="eggleston30" n="30"/>
in a previous chapter, every gentleman in
Virginia, not wholly incapable of rendering
service, enlisted at the beginning of the
war, and the companies, unarmed, untrained,
and hardly even organized, were sent at
once to camps of instruction. Here they
<pb id="eggleston31" n="31"/>
were in theory drilled and disciplined and
made into soldiers, by the little handful of
available West-Pointers and the lads from
the Military Institute at Lexington. In point
of fact, they were only organized and taught
the rudiments of the drill before being sent
to the front as full-fledged soldiers; and it
was only after a year or more of active
service in the field that they began to
suspect what the real work and the real
character of the modern soldier is.</p>
          <p>Our ideas of the life and business of a
soldier were drawn chiefly from the adventures
of Ivanhoe and Charles O'Malley, two worthies
with whose personal history almost every
man in the army was familiar. The men who
volunteered went to war of their own accord,
and were wholly unaccustomed to acting on
any other than their own motion. They were
hardy lovers of field sports, accustomed to out-door
life, and in all physical respects excellent material
of which to make an army. But they were
<pb id="eggleston32" n="32"/>
not used to control of any sort, and were
not disposed to obey anybody except for
good and sufficient reason given. While
actually on drill they obeyed the word of
command, not so much by reason of its
being proper to obey a command, as
because obedience was in that case
necessary to the successful issue of a
pretty performance in which they were
interested. Off drill they did as they
pleased, holding themselves gentlemen, and
as such bound to consult only their own
wills. Their officers were of themselves,
chosen by election, and subject, by custom,
to enforced resignation upon petition of the
men. Only corporals cared sufficiently little
for their position to risk any magnifying of
their office by the enforcement of discipline.
I make of them an honorable exception, out of
regard for the sturdy corporal who, at Ashland,
marched six of us (a guard detail) through
the very middle of a puddle, assigning as his
reason for doing so the fact that “It's
<pb id="eggleston33" n="33"/>
plagued little authority they give us corporals,
and I mean to use that little, anyhow.” Even
corporals were elected, however, and until
December, 1861,  I never knew a single instance
in which a captain dared offend his men by
breaking a noncommissioned officer, or
appointing one, without submitting the matter
to a vote of the company. In that first instance
the captain had to bolster himself up with
written authority from head-quarters, and even
then it required three weeks of mingled
diplomacy and discipline to quell the mutiny
which resulted.</p>
          <p>With troops of this kind, the reader will
readily. understand, a feeling of very democratic
equality prevailed, so far at least as military
rank had anything to do with it. Officers were
no better than men, and so officers and men
messed and slept together on terms of entire
equality, quarreling and even fighting now and then,
in a gentlemanly way, but without a thought of allowing
<pb id="eggleston34" n="34"/>
differences of military rank to have any
influence in the matter. The theory was that the
officers were the creatures of the men, chosen
by election to represent their constituency in the
performance of certain duties, and that only
during good behavior. And to this theory the
officers themselves gave in their adhesion in a
hundred ways. Indeed, they could do nothing
else, inasmuch as they knew no way of quelling
a mutiny.</p>
          <p>There was one sort of rank, however,
which was both maintained and respected
from the first, namely, that of social life. The
line of demarkation between gentry and
common people is not more sharply drawn
anywhere than in Virginia. It rests there
upon an indeterminate something or other,
known as family. To come of a good family is a
patent of nobility, and there is no other way whatever
by which any man or any woman can find a passage
into the charmed circle of Virginia's peerage.
<pb id="eggleston35" n="35"/>
There is no college of heralds, to be
sure, to which doubtful cases may be referred,
and there is no law governing the matter;
but every Virginian knows what families
are, and what are not good ones, and
so mistakes are impossible. The social
position of every man is sharply defined,
and every man carried it with him into the
army. The man of good family felt himself
superior, as in most cases he unquestionably
was, to his fellow-soldier of less excellent
birth; and this distinction was sufficient,
during the early years of the war,
to override everything like military rank.
In one instance which I remember, a young
private asserted his superiority of social
standing so effectually as to extort from
the lieutenant commanding his company a
public apology for an insult offered in the
subjection of the private to double duty, as
a punishment for absence from roll-call.
The lieutenant was brave enough to have
taken a flogging at the hands of the insulted
<pb id="eggleston36" n="36"/>
private, perhaps, but he could not
face the declared sentiment of the entire
company, and so he apologized. I have
known numberless cases in which privates
have declined dinner and other invitations
from officers who had presumed upon their
shoulder-straps in asking the company of
their social superiors.</p>
          <p>In the camp of instruction at Ashland,
where the various cavalry companies
existing in Virginia were sent to be made
into soldiers, it was a very common thing
indeed for men who grew tired of camp
fare to take their meals at the hotel, and one
or two of them rented cottages and brought
their families there, excusing themselves
from attendance upon unreasonably early
roll-calls, by pleading the distance from their
cottages to the parade-ground. Whenever a
detail was made for the purpose of cleaning
the camp-ground, the men detailed regarded
themselves as responsible for the proper
performance of the task by their
<pb id="eggleston37" n="37"/>
servants, and uncomplainingly took upon
themselves the duty of sitting on the fence
and superintending the work. The two or
three men of the overseer class who were
to be found in nearly every company turned
some nimble quarters by standing other
men's turns of guard-duty at twenty-five
cents an hour; and one young gentleman of
my own company, finding himself assigned
to a picket rope post, where his only duty
was to guard the horses and prevent them,
in their untrained exuberance of spirit, from
becoming entangled in each other's heels
and halters, coolly called his servant and
turned the matter over to him, with a rather
informal but decidedly pointed injunction not
to let those horses get themselves into
trouble if he valued his hide. This case
coming to the ears of Colonel (afterwards
General) Ewell, who was commanding the
camp, that officer reorganized the guard
service upon principles as novel as they
were objectionable to the men.
<pb id="eggleston38" n="38"/>
He required the men to stand their own
turns, and, worse than that, introduced the
system, in vogue among regular troops, of
keeping the entire guard detail at the
guardhouse when not on post, an
encroachment upon personal liberty which
sorely tried the patience of the young
cavaliers.</p>
          <p>It was in this undisciplined state that the
men who afterwards made up the army
under Lee were sent to the field to meet the
enemy at Bull Run and elsewhere, and the
only wonder is that they were ever able to
fight at all. They were certainly not
soldiers. They were as ignorant of the
alphabet of obedience as their officers were
of the art of commanding. And yet they
acquitted themselves reasonably well, a fact
which can be explained only by reference to
the causes of their insubordination in camp.
These men were the people of the South,
and the war was their own; wherefore they
fought to win it of their own accord, and
not at all because their officers
<pb id="eggleston39" n="39"/>
commanded them to do so. Their personal
spirit and their intelligence were their sole
elements of strength. Death has few terrors
for such men, as compared with dishonor,
and so they needed no officers at all, and no
discipline, to insure their personal good
conduct on the field of battle. The same
elements of character, too, made them
accept hardship with the utmost
cheerfulness, as soon as hardship became a
necessary condition to the successful
prosecution of a war that every man of
them regarded as his own. In camp, at
Richmond or Ashland, they had shunned all
unnecessary privation and all distasteful
duty, because they then saw no occasion to
endure avoidable discomfort. But in the
field they showed themselves great,
stalwart men in spirit as well as in bodily
frame, and endured cheerfully the hardships
of campaigning precisely as they would have
borne the fatigues of a hunt, as incidents
encountered in the prosecution of their purposes.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston40" n="40"/>
          <p>During the spring and early summer of
1861, the men did not dream that they
were to be paid anything for their services,
or even that the government was to clothe
them. They had bought their own uniforms,
and whenever these wore out they ordered
new ones to be sent, by the first
opportunity, from home. I remember the
very first time the thought of getting
clothing from the government ever entered
my own mind. I was serving in Stuart's
cavalry, and the summer of 1861 was
nearly over. My boots had worn out, and as
there happened at the time to be a strict
embargo upon all visiting on the part of
non-military people, I could not get a new pair
from home. The spurs of my comrades had
made uncomfortable impressions upon my
bare feet every day for a week, when some
one suggested that I might possibly buy a
pair of boots from the quartermaster, who
was for the first time in possession of
some government property of
<pb id="eggleston41" n="41"/>
that description. When I returned with the
boots and reported that the official had
refused my proffered cash, contenting
himself with charging the amount against
me as a debit to be deducted from the
amount of my <hi rend="italics">pay and clothing allowance,</hi>
there was great merriment in the camp. The
idea that there was anybody back of us in this
war  -  anybody who could, by any ingenuity of
legal quibbling, be supposed to be indebted
to us for our voluntary services in our own
cause  -  was too ridiculous to be treated
seriously. “Pay money” became the
standing subject for jests. The card-playing
with which the men amused themselves
suffered a revolution at once; euchre gave
place to poker, played for “pay money,” the
winnings to fall due when payday should
come,  -  a huge joke which was heartily
enjoyed.</p>
          <p>From this the reader will see how little
was done in the beginning of the war to
ward the organization of an efficient quartermaster's
<pb id="eggleston42" n="42"/>
department, and how completely this
ill-organized and undisciplined mob of plucky
gentlemen was left to prosecute the war as
best it could, trusting to luck for clothing
and even for food. Of these things I
shall have occasion to speak more fully in a
future chapter, wherein I shall have
something to say of the management of
affairs at Richmond. At present, I merely
refer to the matter for the purpose of
correcting an error (if I may hope to do
that) which seems likely to creep into
history. We have been told over and over
again that the Confederate army could not
possibly have given effectual pursuit to
General McDowell's flying forces after the
battle of Bull Run. It is urged, in defense of
the inaction which made of that day's work
a waste effort, that we could not move
forward for want of transportation and
supplies. Now, without discussing the
question whether or not a prompt movement
on Washington would have resulted favorably
<pb id="eggleston43" n="43"/>
to the Confederates, I am certain, as every
man who was there is, that this want of
transportation and supplies had nothing
whatever to do with it. We had no supplies
of any importance, it is true, but none were
coming to us there, and we were no whit
better off in this regard at Manassas than
we would have been before Washington.
And having nothing to transport, we needed
no transportation. Had the inefficiency of
the supply department stopped short at its
failure to furnish wagon trains, it might have
stood in the way of a forward movement.
But that was no ordinary incompetence
which governed this department of our
service in all its ramifications. The breadth
and comprehensiveness of that
incompetence were its distinguishing
characteristics. In failing to furnish anything
to transport, it neutralized its failure to
furnish transportation, and the army that
fought at Bull Run would have been as
well off anywhere else as there, during the
<pb id="eggleston44" n="44"/>
next ten days. Indeed, two days after the
battle we were literally starved out at
Manassas, and were forced to advance to
Fairfax Court House in order to get the
supplies which the Union army had left in
abundance wherever there was a
storing-place for them. The next morning
after the battle, many of the starving men
went off on their own account to get
provisions, and they knew very well where
to find them. There were none at
Manassas, but by crossing Bull Run and
following the line of the Federal retreat, we
soon gathered a store sufficient to last us,
while the authorities of the quartermaster's
department were finding out how to
transport the few sheet-iron frying-pans
which, with an unnecessary tent here and
there, were literally the only things there
were to be transported at all. Food, which
was the only really necessary thing just
then, lay ahead of us and nowhere else. All
the ammunition we had we could and did
move with the wagons at hand.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston45" n="45"/>
          <p>To return to the temper of the troops and
people. Did the Southerners really think
themselves a match for ten times their own
numbers? I know the reader wants to ask
this question, because almost everybody I
talk to on the subject asks it in one shape or
another. In answer let me say, I think a few
of the more enthusiastic women, cherishing
a blind faith in the righteousness of their
cause, and believing, in spite of historical
precedent, that wars always end with strict
regard to the laws of poetic justice, did think
something of the sort; and I am certain that
all the stump speakers of the kind I have
hitherto described held a like faith most
devoutly. But with these exceptions I never
saw any Southerner who hoped for any but
well-fought-for success. It was not a
question of success or defeat with them at
all. They thought they saw their duty plainly,
and they did it without regard to the
consequences. Their whole hearts were in the
<pb id="eggleston46" n="46"/>
cause, and as they were human beings they
naturally learned to expect the result for
which they were laboring and fighting and
suffering; but they based no hopes upon any
such fancy as that the Virginian soldier was
the military equivalent of ten or of two
Pennsylvanians armed as well as he. On the
contrary, they busily counted the chances
and weighed the probabilities on both sides
from the first. They claimed an advantage in
the fact that their young men were more
universally accustomed to field sports and
the use of arms than were those of the
North. They thought too, that, fighting on
their own soil, in an essentially defensive
struggle, they would have some advantage,
as they certainly did. They thought they might
in the end tire their enemy out, and they hoped
from the first for relief through foreign
intervention in some shape. These were the
grounds of their hopes; but had there been no
hope for them at all, I verily believe they would
<pb id="eggleston47" n="47"/>
have fought all the same. Certainly they
had small reason to hope for success
after the campaign of 1863, but they fought
on nevertheless, until they could fight no
more. Let the reader remember that as the
Southerners understood the case, they
could not, without a complete sacrifice of
honor, do anything else than fight on until
utterly crushed, and he will then be
prepared to understand how small a figure
the question of success or failure cut in
determining their course.</p>
          <p>The unanimity of the people was simply
marvelous. So long as the question of
secession was under discussion, opinions
were both various and violent. The moment
secession was finally determined upon, a
revolution was wrought. There was no
longer anything to discuss, and so discussion
ceased. Men got ready for war, and
delicate women with equal spirit sent them
off with smiling faces. The man who
tarried at home for never so brief a time,
<pb id="eggleston48" n="48"/>
after the call to arms had been given, found
it necessary to explain himself to every
woman of his acquaintance, and no
explanation was sufficient to shield him
from the social ostracism consequent upon
any long-tarrying. Throughout the war it was
the same, and when the war ended the men
who lived to return were greeted with sad
faces by those who had cheerfully and even
joyously sent them forth to the battle.</p>
          <p>Under these circumstances, the reader
will readily understand, the first call for
troops took nearly all the men of
Virginia away from their homes. Even the
boys in the colleges and schools enlisted,
and these establishments were forced to
suspend for want of students. In one
college the president organized the students,
and making himself their commander, led
them directly from the class-room to the field.
So strong and all-embracing was the thought
that every man owed it to the community to
become a soldier, that even clergymen went
<pb id="eggleston49" n="49"/>
into the army by the score, and large
districts of country were left too without a
physician, until the people could secure, by
means of a memorial, the unanimous vote
of the company to which some favorite
physician belonged, declaring it to be his
patriotic duty to remain at home. Without
such an instruction from his comrades no
physician would consent to withdraw, and
even with it very many of them preferred to
serve in the ranks.</p>
          <p>These were the men of whom the
Confederate army was for the first year or
two chiefly composed. After that the
conscription brought in a good deal of
material which was worse than useless.
There were some excellent soldiers who
came into the army as conscripts, but they
were exceptions to the rule. For the most
part the men whose bodies were thus lugged
in by force had no spirits to bring with them.
They had already lived a long time under
all the contumely which a reputation for
<pb id="eggleston50" n="50"/>
confessed cowardice could bring upon them.
The verdict of their neighbors was already
pronounced, and they could not possibly
change it now by good conduct. They
brought discontent with them into the camp,
and were sullenly worthless as soldiers
throughout. They were a leaven of
demoralization which the army would have
been better without. But they were
comparatively few in number, and as the
character of the army was crystallized long
before these men came into it at all, they
had little influence in determining the
conduct of the whole. If they added nothing
to our strength, they could do little to
weaken us, and in any estimate of the
character of the Confederate army they
hardly count at all. The men who early in
the war struggled for a place in the front
rank, whenever there was chance of a fight,
and thought themselves unlucky if they failed
to get it, are the men who gave character afterwards
to the well-organized and well-disciplined
<pb id="eggleston51" n="51"/>
army which so long contested the ground
before Richmond. They did become soldiers
after a while, well regulated and
thoroughly effective. The process of
disciplining them took away none of their
personal spirit or their personal interest in
the war, but it taught them the value of
unquestioning obedience, and the virtue
there was in yielding it. I remember very
well the extreme coolness with which, in
one of the valley skirmishes, a few days
before the first battle of Bull Run, a
gentleman private in my own company rode
out of the ranks for the purpose of
suggesting to J. E. B. Stuart the propriety of
charging a gun which was shelling us, and
which seemed nearer to us than to its
supporting infantry. I heard another
gentleman without rank, who had brought a
dispatch to Stonewall Jackson, request that
officer to “cut the answer short,” on the
ground that his horse was a little lame and
he feared his inability to deliver it as
promptly as was desirable.
<pb id="eggleston52" n="52"/>
These men and their comrades lost none of
this personal solicitude for the proper
conduct of the war, in process of becoming
soldiers, but they learned not to question or
advise, when their duty was to listen and
obey. Their very errors, as General
Stuart once said in my hearing, proved them
the best of material out of which to make
soldiers. “They are pretty good officers
now,” he said, “ and after a while they will
make excellent soldiers too. They only
need <hi rend="italics">reducing to the ranks</hi>.”</p>
          <p>This personal interest in the war, which in
their undisciplined beginning led them into
indiscreet meddling with details of policy
belonging to their superiors, served to
sustain them when as disciplined soldiers
they were called upon to bear a degree of
hardship of which they had never dreamed.
They learned to trust the management of
affairs to the officers, asking no questions,
but finding their own greatest usefulness in
cheerful and ready obedience. The wish
<pb id="eggleston53" n="53"/>
to help, which made them unsoldierly at
first, served to make them especially
good soldiers when it was duly tempered
with discipline and directed by experience.
The result was that even in the darkest days
of the struggle, when these soldiers knew
they were losing everything but their honor,
when desperation led them to think of a
thousand expedients and to see
every blunder that was made, they waited
patiently for the word of command, and
obeyed it with alacrity and cheerfulness
when it came, however absurd it might
seem. I remember an incident which will
serve to illustrate this. The Federal forces
one day captured an important fort on the
north side of James River, which had been
left almost unguarded, through the
blundering of the officer charged with its
defense. It must be retaken, or the entire line
in that place must be abandoned, and a new one
built, at great risk of losing Richmond. Two
bodies of infantry were ordered to charge it on
<pb id="eggleston54" n="54"/>
different sides, while the command to which
I was then attached should shell it vigorously
with mortars. In order that the attack might
be simultaneously made on the two sides, a
specific time was set for it, but for some
unexplained reason there was a
misunderstanding between the two
commanders. The one on the farther side
began the attack twenty minutes too soon.
Every man of the other body, which lay
there by our still silent mortars, knew
perfectly well that the attack had begun, and
that they ought to strike then if at all. They
knew that, without their aid and that of the
mortars, their friends would be repulsed, and
that a like result would follow their own assault
when it should be made, twenty minutes later.
They remained as they were, however, hearing
the rattle of the musketry and listening with calm
faces to the exulting cheers of the victorious
enemy. Then came their own time, and
knowing perfectly well that their assault
<pb id="eggleston55" n="55"/>
was now a useless waste of life, they
obeyed the order as it had been delivered
to them, and knocked at the very gates of
that fortress for an hour. These men, in
1861, would have clamored for immediate
attack as the only hope of accomplishing
anything, and had their commander insisted,
in such a case, upon obeying orders, they
would in all probability have charged without
him. In 1864 having become soldiers, they
obeyed orders even at cost of failure. They
had reduced themselves to the ranks  -  that
was all.</p>
        </div2>
        <pb id="eggleston56" n="56"/>
        <div2>
          <head>CHAPTER III.<lb/>THE TEMPER OF THE WOMEN.</head>
          <p>DURING the latter part of the year in which
the war between the States came to an end, a
Southern comic writer, in a letter addressed to
Artemus Ward, summed up the political outlook
in one sentence, reading somewhat as follows:
“You may reconstruct the men, with your laws
and things, but how are you going to reconstruct
the women? <hi rend="italics">Whoop-ee!</hi>” Now this unauthorized
but certainly very expressive interjection had a
deal of truth at its back, and I am very sure that
I have never yet known a thoroughly “reconstructed”
woman. The reason, of course, is not far to seek.
The women of the South could hardly have
been more desperately in earnest than their
husbands and brothers and sons were,
<pb id="eggleston57" n="57"/>
in the prosecution of the war, but with their
woman-natures they gave themselves wholly to
the cause, and having loved it heartily when it
gave promise of a sturdy life, they almost
worship it now that they have strewn its bier
with funeral flowers. To doubt its righteousness,
or to falter in their loyalty to it while it lived,
would have been treason and infidelity; to do
the like now that it is dead would be to them
little less than sacrilege.</p>
          <p>I wish I could adequately tell my reader of the
part those women played in the war. If I could
make these pages show the half of their
nobleness; if I could describe the sufferings
they endured, and tell of their cheerfulness
under it all; if the reader might guess the utter
unselfishness with which they laid themselves
and the things they held nearest their hearts
upon the altar of the only country they knew as
their own, the rare heroism with which they
played their sorrowful part in a drama which
<pb id="eggleston58" n="58"/>
was to them a long tragedy; if my pages
could be made to show the half of these
things, all womankind, I am sure, would
tenderly cherish the record, and nobody
would wonder again at the tenacity with
which the women of the South still hold
their allegiance to the lost cause.</p>
          <p>Theirs was a peculiarly hard lot. The real
sorrows of war, like those of drunkenness,
always fall most heavily upon women. They
may not bear arms. They may not even
share the triumphs which compensate their
brethren for toil and suffering and danger.
They must sit still and endure. The poverty
which war brings to them wears no
cheerful face, but sits down with them to
empty tables and pinches them sorely in
solitude.</p>
          <p>After the victory, the men who have won
it throw up their hats in a glad huzza, while
their wives and daughters await in sorest
agony of suspense the news which may
bring hopeless desolation to their hearts.
<pb id="eggleston59" n="59"/>
To them the victory may mean the loss of
those for whom they lived and in whom
they hoped, while to those who have fought
the battle it brings only gladness. And all
this was true of Southern women almost
without exception. The fact that all the men
capable of bearing arms went into the
army, and stayed there, gave to every
woman in the South a personal interest not
only in the general result of each battle, but
in the list of killed and wounded as well.
Poverty, too, and privation of the sorest
kind, was the common lot, while the
absence of the men laid many heavy
burdens of work and responsibility upon
shoulders unused to either. But they bore it
all, not cheerfully only, but gladly. They
believed it to be the duty of every able-bodied
man to serve in the army, and they eagerly
sent the men of their own homes to the field,
frowning undisguisedly upon every laggard
until there were no laggards left. And their
spirit knew no change as the war went on.
<pb id="eggleston60" n="60"/>
Their idea of men's duty comprehended
nothing less than persistence as long as a
shot could be fired. When they saw that the
end was not to be victory, but defeat, that
fact made no change whatever in their view
of the duty to be done. Still less did their
own privations and labors and sufferings
tend to dampen their ardor. On the
contrary, the more heavily the war bore
upon themselves, the more persistently did
they demand that it should be fought out to
the end. When they lost a husband, a son,
or a brother, they held the loss only an
additional reason for faithful adherence to
the cause. Having made such a sacrifice to
that which was almost a religion to them,
they had, if possible, less thought than ever
of proving unfaithful to it.</p>
          <p>I put these general statements first, so
that the reader who shall be interested in
such anecdotes as I shall have to tell may
not be misled thereby into the thought that
these good women were implacable or vindictive,
<pb id="eggleston61" n="61"/>
when they were only devoted to a cause
which in their eyes represented the sum
of all righteousness.</p>
          <p>I remember a conversation between two
of them,  -  one a young wife whose husband
was in the army, and the other an elderly
lady, with no husband or son, but with many
friends and near relatives in marching
regiments. The younger lady remarked,  -  </p>
          <p>“I'm sure I do not hate our enemies. I
earnestly hope their souls may go to heaven,
but I would like to blow all their mortal
bodies away, as fast as they come upon our
soil.”</p>
          <p>“Why, you shock me, my dear,” replied
the other; “I don't see why you want the
Yankees to go to heaven! I hope to get
there myself some day, and I'm sure I
shouldn't want to go if I thought I should
find any of them there.”</p>
          <p>This old lady was convinced from the
first that the South would fail, and she
<pb id="eggleston62" n="62"/>
based this belief upon the fact that we had
permitted Yankees to build railroads
through the Southern States. “I tell you,”
she would say, “that's what they built the
railroads for. They knew the war was
coming, and they got ready for it. The
railroads will whip us, you may depend.
What else were they made for? We got on
well enough without them, and we oughtn't
to have let anybody build them.” And no
amount of reasoning would serve to shake
her conviction that the people of the North
had built all our railroads with treacherous
intent, though the stock of the only road she
had ever seen was held very largely by
the people along its line, many of whom
were her own friends.</p>
          <p>She always insisted, too, that the
Northern troops came South and made war
for the sole purpose of taking possession of
our lands and negroes, and she was astonished
almost out of her wits when she learned that
the negroes were free. She had supposed
<pb id="eggleston63" n="63"/>
that they were simply to change
masters, and even then she lived for
months in daily anticipation of the coming
of “the new land owners,” who were
waiting, she supposed, for assignments of
plantations to be made to them by military
authority.</p>
          <p>“They'll quarrel about the division,
maybe,” she said one day, “and then there'll
be a chance for us to whip them again, I
hope.” The last time I saw her, she had not
yet become convinced that title-deeds were
still to be respected.</p>
          <p>A young girl, ordinarily of a very gentle
disposition, astonished a Federal colonel one
day by an outburst of temper which served
at least to show the earnestness of her
purpose to uphold her side of the argument.
She lived in a part of the country then for
the first time held by the Federal army, and
a colonel, with some members of his staff,
made her family the unwilling recipients
of a call one morning. Seeing the piano
open, the colonel asked the young
<pb id="eggleston64" n="64"/>
lady to play, but she declined. He then went
to the instrument himself, but he had hardly
begun to play when the damsel, raising the
piano top, severed nearly all the strings with
a hatchet, saying to the astonished
performer, as she did so,  -  </p>
          <p>“That's my piano, and it shall not give
you a minute's pleasure.” The colonel
bowed, apologized, and replied,  -  </p>
          <p>“If all your people are as ready as you to
make costly sacrifices, we might as well
go home.”</p>
          <p>And most of them were ready and willing
to make similar sacrifices. One lady of my
acquaintance knocked in the heads of a
dozen casks of choice wine rather than
allow some Federal officers to sip as many
glasses of it. Another destroyed her own
library, which was very precious to her,
when that seemed the only way in which
she could prevent the staff of a general
officer, camped near her, from enjoying a
few hours' reading in her parlor every
morning.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston65" n="65"/>
          <p>In New Orleans, soon after the war, I
saw in a drawing-room, one day, an
elaborately framed letter, of which, the
curtains being drawn, I could read only the
signature, which to my astonishment was
that of General Butler.</p>
          <p>“What is that?” I asked of the young
gentlewoman I was visiting.</p>
          <p>“Oh, that's my diploma, my certificate of
good behavior, from General Butler;” and
taking it down from the wall, she permitted
me to read it, telling me at the same time
its history. It seems that the young lady
had been very active in aiding captured
Confederates to escape from New
Orleans, and for this and other similar
offenses she was arrested several times.
A gentleman who knew General Butler
personally had interested himself in behalf
of her and some of her friends, and upon
making an appeal for their discharge received
this personal note from the commanding
general, in which he declared his
<pb id="eggleston66" n="66"/>
willingness to discharge all the others, “But
that black-eyed Miss B.,” he wrote, “seems to
me an incorrigible little devil whom even prison
fare won't tame.” The young lady had framed
the note, and she cherishes it yet, doubtless.</p>
          <p>There is a story told of General Forrest, which
will serve to show his opinion of the pluck and
devotion of the Southern women. He was
drawing his men up in line of battle one day, and
it was evident that a sharp encounter was about
to take place. Some ladies ran from a house,
which happened to stand just in front of his line,
and asked him anxiously,  -  </p>
          <p>“What shall we do, general, what shall we do?”</p>
          <p>Strong in his faith that they only wished to
help in some way, he replied,  -  </p>
          <p>“I really don't see that you can do much,
except to stand on stumps, wave your bonnets,
and shout ‘Hurrah, boys!’”</p>
          <p>In Richmond, when the hospitals were
<pb id="eggleston67" n="67"/>filled with wounded men brought in from the
seven days' fighting with McClellan, and the
surgeons found it impossible to dress half the
wounds, a band was formed, consisting of nearly
all the married women of the city, who took upon
themselves the duty of going to the hospitals
and dressing wounds from morning till night;
and they persisted in their painful duty until
every man was cared for, saving hundreds of
lives, as the surgeons unanimously testified.
When nitre was found to be growing scarce, and
the supply of gunpowder was consequently
about to give out, women all over the land dug
up the earth in their smokehouses and tobacco
barns, and with their own hands faithfully
extracted the desired salt, for use in the
government laboratories.</p>
          <p>Many of them denied themselves not
only delicacies, but substantial food also,
when by enduring semi-starvation they could
add to the stock of food at the command
of the subsistence officers. I myself
<pb id="eggleston68" n="68"/>
knew more than one houseful of women,
who, from the moment that food began to
grow scarce, refused to eat meat or drink
coffee, living thenceforth only upon
vegetables of a speedily perishable sort, in
order that they might leave the more for
the soldiers in the field. When a friend
remonstrated with one of them, on the
ground that her health, already frail, was
breaking down utterly for want of proper
diet, she replied, in a quiet, determined
way; “I know that very well; but it is little
that I can do, and I must do that little at any
cost. My health and my life are worth less
than those of my brothers, and if they give
theirs to the cause, why should not I do the
same? I would starve to death cheerfully if
I could feed one soldier more by doing so,
but the things I eat can't be sent to camp. I
think it a sin to eat anything that can be
used for rations.” And she meant what
she said, too, as a little mound in the
church-yard testifies.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston69" n="69"/>
          <p>Every Confederate remembers
gratefully the reception given him when he
went into any house where these women
were. Whoever he might be, and whatever
his plight, if he wore the gray, he was
received, not as a beggar or tramp, not even
as a stranger, but as a son of the house, for
whom it held nothing too good, and whose
comfort was the one care of all its inmates,
even though their own must be sacrificed in
securing it. When the hospitals were
crowded, the people earnestly besought
permission to take the men to their houses
and to care for them there, and for many
months almost every house within a hundred
miles of Richmond held one or more
wounded men as especially honored
guests.</p>
          <p>“God bless these Virginia women!” said
a general officer from one of the cotton
States, one day, “they're worth a regiment
apiece;” and he spoke the thought of the
army, except that their blessing covered the
whole country as well as Virginia.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston70" n="70"/>
          <p>The ingenuity with which these good ladies
discovered or manufactured onerous duties
for themselves was surprising, and having
discovered or imagined some new duty they
straightway proceeded to do it at any cost.
An excellent Richmond dame was talking
with a soldier friend, when he carelessly
remarked that there was nothing which so
greatly helped to keep up a contented and
cheerful spirit among the men as the receipt
of letters from their woman friends. Catching
at the suggestion as a revelation of duty, she
asked, “And cheerfulness makes better
soldiers of the men, does it not?” Receiving
yes for an answer, the frail little woman,
already overburdened with cares of an
unusual sort, sat down and made out a list of
all the men with whom she was acquainted
even in the smallest possible way, and from
that day until the end of the war she wrote one
letter a week to each, a task which, as her
acquaintance was large, taxed her time and
<pb id="eggleston71" n="71"/>strength very severely. Not content with
this, she wrote on the subject in the
newspapers, earnestly urging a like course
upon her sisters, many of whom adopted the
suggestion at once, much to the delight of
the soldiers, who little dreamed that the
kindly, cheerful, friendly letters which every
mail brought into camp, were a part of
woman's self-appointed work for the
success of the common cause. From the
beginning to the end of the war it was the
same. No cry of pain escaped woman's lips
at the parting which sent the men into camp;
no word of despondency was spoken when
hope seemed most surely dead; no complaint
from the women ever reminded their soldier
husbands and sons and brothers that there
was hardship and privation and terror at
home. They bore all with brave hearts and
cheerful faces, and even when they
mourned the death of their most tenderly
loved ones, they comforted themselves with
the thought that they buried only heroic
dust.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston72" n="72"/>
          <p>“It is the death I would have chosen for
him,” wrote the widow of a friend whose
loss I had announced to her. “I loved him
for his manliness, and now that he has
shown that manliness by dying as a hero
dies, I mourn, but am not heart-broken. I
know that a brave man awaits me whither I
am going.”</p>
          <p>They carried their efforts to cheer and
help the troops into every act of their
lives. When they could, they visited camp.
Along the lines of march they came out with
water or coffee or tea,   -  the best they had,
whatever it might be,  -   with flowers, or
garlands of green when their flowers were
gone. A bevy of girls stood under a sharp
fire from the enemy's lines at Petersburg
one day, while they sang Bayard Taylor's
Song of the Camp, responding to an encore
with the stanza:  -  </p>
          <lg type="poem">
            <l>“Ah! soldiers, to your honored rest,</l>
            <l>Your truth and valor bearing,</l>
            <l>The bravest are the tenderest,</l>
            <l>The loving are the daring!”</l>
          </lg>
          <pb id="eggleston73" n="73"/>
          <p>Indeed, the coolness of women under fire
was always a matter of surprise to me. A
young girl, not more than sixteen years of
age, acted as guide to a scouting party
during the early years of the war, and when
we urged her to go back after the enemy
had opened a vigorous fire upon us, she
declined, on the plea that she believed we
were “going to charge those fellows,” and
she “wanted to see the fun.” At Petersburg
women did their shopping and went about
their duties under a most uncomfortable
bombardment, without evincing the slightest
fear or showing any nervousness whatever.</p>
          <p>But if the cheerfulness of the women
during the war was remarkable, what shall
we say of the way in which they met its
final failure and the poverty that came with
it? The end of the war completed the ruin
which its progress had wrought. Women
who had always lived in luxury, and whose
labors and sufferings during the war were
<pb id="eggleston74" n="74"/>
lightened by the consciousness that in
suffering and laboring they were doing their
part toward the accomplishment of the end
upon which all hearts were set, were now
compelled to face not temporary but
permanent poverty, and to endure, without a
motive or a sustaining purpose, still sorer
privations than any they had known in the
past. The country was exhausted, and
nobody could foresee any future but one of
abject wretchedness. It was seed-time, but
the suddenly freed negroes had not yet
learned that freedom meant aught else than
idleness, and the spring was gone before
anything like a reorganization of the labor
system could be effected. The men might
emigrate when they should get home, but the
case of the women was a very sorry one
indeed. They kept their spirits up through it
all, however, and improvised a new social
system in which absolute poverty, cheerfully
borne, was the badge of respectability.
<pb id="eggleston75" n="75"/>
Everybody was poor except the speculators
who had fattened upon the necessities of
the women and children, and so poverty
was essential to anything like good repute.
The return of the soldiers made some
sort of social festivity necessary, and
“starvation parties ” were given, at which it
was understood that the givers were wholly
unable to set out refreshments of any kind.
In the matter of dress, too, the general
poverty was recognized, and every one went
clad in whatever he or she happened to
have. The want of means became a jest,
and nobody mourned over it; while all were
laboring to repair their wasted fortunes as
they best could. And all this was due solely
to the unconquerable cheerfulness of the
Southern women. The men came home moody,
worn out, discouraged, and but for the influence
of woman's cheerfulness, the Southern States
might have fallen into a lethargy from
<pb id="eggleston76" n="76"/>
which they could not have recovered for
generations.</p>
          <p>Such prosperity as they have since achieved
is largely due to the courage and spirit of their
noble women.</p>
        </div2>
        <pb id="eggleston77" n="77"/>
        <div2>
          <head>CHAPTER IV.<lb/>OF THE TIME WHEN MONEY WAS “EASY.”</head>
          <p>IT seems a remarkable fact that during the late
Congressional travail with the currency
question, no one of the people in or out of
Congress, who were concerned lest there should
not be enough money in the country to “move
the crops,” ever took upon himself the pleasing
task of rehearsing the late Confederacy's
financial story, for the purpose of showing by
example how simple and easy a thing it is to
create wealth out of nothing by magic
revolutions of the printing-press, and to make
rich, by act of Congress, everybody not too lazy
to gather free dollars into a pile. The story has all
the flavor of the Princess Scheherezade's
romances, with the additional merit of being
historically true. For once a whole
<pb id="eggleston78" n="78"/>
people was rich. Money was “easy” enough to
satisfy everybody, and everybody had it in
unstinted measure. This money was not, it is
true, of a quality to please the believers in a
gold or other arbitrary standard of value, but
that is a matter of little consequence, now that
senators and representatives of high repute
have shown that the best currency possible is
that which exists only by the will of the
government, and the volume of which is
regulated by the cravings of the people alone.
That so apt an illustration of the financial views
of the majority in Congress should have been
wholly neglected, during the discussions,
seems therefore unaccountable.</p>
          <p>The financial system adopted by the
Confederate government was singularly simple
and free from technicalities. It consisted chiefly
in the issue of treasury notes enough to meet
all the expenses of the government, and in
the present advanced state of the art of
printing there was but one difficulty incident
<pb id="eggleston79" n="79"/>
to this process; namely, the impossibility
of having the notes signed in the Treasury
Department, as fast as they were needed. There
happened, however, to be several thousand
young ladies in Richmond willing to accept light
and remunerative employment at their homes,
and as it was really a matter of small moment
whose name the notes bore, they were given out
in sheets to these young ladies, who signed and
returned them for a consideration. I shall not
undertake to guess how many Confederate
treasury notes were issued. Indeed, I am credibly
informed by a gentleman who was high in office
in the Treasury Department, that even the secretary
himself did not certainly know. The acts of Congress
authorizing issues of currency were the hastily
formulated thought of a not very wise body of men,
and my informant tells me they were frequently
susceptible of widely different construction
by different officials. However that may be, it
<pb id="eggleston80" n="80"/>
was clearly out of the power of the
government ever to redeem the notes, and
whatever may have been the state of
affairs within the treasury, nobody outside
its precincts ever cared to muddle his head
in an attempt to get at exact figures.</p>
          <p>We knew only that money was
astonishingly abundant. Provisions fell short
sometimes, and the supply of clothing was
not always as large as we should have liked,
but nobody found it difficult to get money
enough. It was to be had almost for the
asking. And to some extent the abundance
of the currency really seemed to atone for
its extreme badness. Going the rounds of
the pickets on the coast of South Carolina,
one day, in 1863, I heard a conversation
between a Confederate and a Union soldier,
stationed on opposite sides of a little inlet, in
the course of which this point was brought
out.</p>
          <p><hi rend="italics">Union Soldier.</hi> Aren't times rather hard
over there, Johnny?</p>
          <pb id="eggleston81" n="81"/>
          <p><hi rend="italics">Confederate Soldier.</hi> Not at all. We've
all the necessaries of life.</p>
          <p><hi rend="italics">U. S.</hi> Yes; but how about luxuries? You
never see any coffee nowadays, do you?</p>
          <p><hi rend="italics">C. S.</hi> Plenty of it.</p>
          <p><hi rend="italics">U. S.</hi> Isn't it pretty high?</p>
          <p><hi rend="italics">C. S. </hi>Forty dollars a pound, that's all.</p>
          <p><hi rend="italics">U. S. </hi>Whew! Don't you call that high?</p>
          <p><hi rend="italics">C. S. </hi>(after reflecting). Well, perhaps it is
a trifle uppish, but then you never saw
money so plentiful as it is with us. We
hardly know what to do with it, and don't
mind paying high prices for things we want.</p>
          <p>And that was the universal feeling.
Money was so easily got, and its value was
so utterly uncertain, that we were never
able to determine what was a fair price for
anything. We fell into the habit of paying
whatever was asked, knowing that to-morrow
we should have to pay more. Speculation
<pb id="eggleston82" n="82"/>
became the easiest and surest thing
imaginable. The speculator saw no risks of
loss. Every article of merchandise rose in
value every day, and to buy anything this
week and sell it next was to make an
enormous profit quite as a matter of course.
So uncertain were prices, or rather so
constantly did they tend upward, that when
a cargo of cadet gray cloths was brought
into Charleston once, an officer in my
battery, attending the sale, was able to
secure enough of the cloth to make two
suits of clothes, without any expense
whatever, merely by speculating upon an
immediate advance. He became the
purchaser, at auction, of a case of the
goods, and had no difficulty, as soon as the
sale was over, in finding a merchant who
was glad to take his bargain off his hands,
giving him the cloth he wanted as a premium.
The officer could not possibly have paid for
the case of goods, but there was nothing surer
than that he could sell again at an advance
<pb id="eggleston83" n="83"/>
the moment the auctioneer's hammer fell on
the last lot of cloths.</p>
          <p>Naturally enough, speculation soon fell
into very bad repute, and the epithet
“speculator” came to be considered the
most opprobrious in the whole vocabulary of
invective. The feeling was universal that the
speculators were fattening upon the
necessities of the country and the sufferings
of the people. Nearly all mercantile business
was regarded at least with suspicion, and
much of it fell into the hands of people with
no reputations to lose, a fact which certainly
did not tend to relieve the community in the
matter of high prices.</p>
          <p>The prices which obtained were almost
fabulous, and singularly enough there
seemed to be no sort of ratio existing
between the values of different articles. I
bought coffee at forty dollars and tea at
thirty dollars a pound on the same day.</p>
          <p>My dinner at a hotel cost me twenty
dollars, while five dollars gained me a seat
<pb id="eggleston84" n="84"/>
in the dress circle of the theatre. I paid one
dollar the next morning for a copy of the
Examiner, but I might have got the Whig,
Dispatch, Enquirer, or Sentinel, for half that
sum. For some wretched tallow candles I
paid ten dollars a pound. The utter absence
of proportion between these several prices
is apparent, and I know of no way of
explaining it except upon the theory that the
unstable character of the money had
superinduced a reckless disregard of all
value on the part of both buyers and sellers.
A facetious friend used to say prices were
so high that nobody could see them, and that
they “got mixed for want of supervision.”
He held, however, that the difference
between the old and the new order
of things was a trifling one. “Before the
war,” he said, “I went to market with the
money in my pocket, and brought back my
purchases in a basket; now I take the
money in the basket, and bring the things
home in my pocket.”</p>
          <pb id="eggleston85" n="85"/>
          <p>As I was returning to my home after the
surrender at Appomattox Court House, a
party of us stopped at the residence of a
planter for supper, and as the country was
full of marauders and horse thieves,
deserters from both armies, bent upon
indiscriminate plunder, our host set a little
black boy to watch our horses while we
ate, with instructions to give the alarm if
anybody should approach. After supper we
dealt liberally with little Sam. Silver and gold
we had none, of course, but Confederate
money was ours in great abundance, and
we bestowed the crisp notes upon the
guardian of our horses, to the extent of
several hundreds of dollars. A richer person
than that little negro I have never seen.
Money, even at par, never carried more of
happiness with it than did those promises of
a dead government to pay. We frankly told
Sam that he could buy nothing with the
notes, but the information brought no
sadness to his simple heart.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston86" n="86"/>
          <p>“I don' want to buy nothin', master,” he
replied. “I's gwine to keep dis <hi rend="italics">always.</hi>”</p>
          <p>I fancy his regard for the worthless paper,
merely because it was called money, was
closely akin to the feeling which had
made it circulate among better-informed
people than he. Everybody knew, long
before the surrender, that these notes never
could be redeemed. There was little reason
to hope, during the last two years of the
war, that the “ratification of a treaty of
peace between the Confederate States and
the United States,” on which the payment
was conditioned, would ever come. We
knew the paper was worthless, and yet it
continued to circulate. It professed to be
money, and on the strength of that
profession people continued to take it in
payment for goods. The amount of it for
which the owner of any article would part
with his possession was always uncertain.
Prices were regulated largely by accident,
and were therefore wholly incongruous.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston87" n="87"/>
          <p>But the disproportion between the prices
of different articles was not greater than
that between the cost of goods imported
through the blockade and their selling price.
The usual custom of blockade-running firms
was to build or buy a steamer in Europe,
bring it to Nassau in ballast, and load it there
with assorted merchandise. Selling this
cargo in Charleston or Wilmington for
Confederate money, they would buy cotton
with which to reload the ship for her
outward voyage. The owner of many of
these ships once told me that if a vessel
which had brought in one cargo were lost
with a load of cotton on her outward
voyage, the owner would lose nothing, the
profits on the merchandise being fully equal
to the entire value of ship and cotton. If he
could get one cargo of merchandise in, and
one of cotton out, the loss of the ship with a
second cargo of merchandise would still
leave him a clear profit of more than a
hundred per cent. upon his investment.
<pb id="eggleston88" n="88"/>
And this was due solely to the abnormal
state of prices in the country, and not at all
to the management of the blockade-runners.
They sold their cargoes at auction,
and bought cotton in the open market.</p>
          <p>Their merchandise brought fabulous
prices, while cotton, for want of a market,
remained disproportionately low. That the
merchants engaged in this trade were in no
way the authors of the state of prices may
be seen from two facts. First, if I am
correctly informed, they uniformly gave the
government an opportunity to take such
articles as it had need of, and especially all
the quinine imported, at the price fixed in
Richmond, without regard to the fact that
speculators would pay greatly more for the
goods. In one case within my own knowledge
a heavy invoice of quinine was sold to the
government for eleven hundred dollars an
ounce, when a speculator stood ready to take
it at double that price. Secondly, the cargo
sales were peremptory, and speculators
<pb id="eggleston89" n="89"/>
sometimes combined and bought a
cargo considerably below the market price,
by appearing at the sale in such numbers as
to exclude all other bidders. In one case, I
remember, the general commanding at
Charleston annulled a cargo sale on this
account, and sent some of the speculators to
jail for the purpose of giving other people an
opportunity to purchase needed goods at
prices very much higher than those forced
upon the sellers by the combination at
the first sale.</p>
          <p>In the winter of 1863-64 Congress
became aware of the fact that prices were
higher than they should be under a sound
currency. If Congress suspected this at any
earlier date, there is nothing in the
proceedings of that body to indicate it. Now,
however, the newspapers were calling
attention to an uncommonly ugly phase of
the matter, and reminding Congress that
what the government bought with a currency
depreciated to less than one per cent.
<pb id="eggleston90" n="90"/>
of its face, the government must some day
pay for in gold at par. The lawgivers took
the alarm and sat themselves down to
devise a remedy for the evil condition of
affairs. With that infantile simplicity which
characterized nearly all the doings and quite
all the financial legislation of the Richmond
Congress, it was decided that the very best
way to enhance the value of the currency
was to depreciate it still further by a
declaratory statute, and then to issue a good
deal more of it. The act set a day, after
which the currency already in circulation
should be worth only two thirds of its face,
at which rate it was made convertible into
notes of the new issue, which some, at least,
of the members of Congress were innocent
enough to believe would be worth very
nearly their par value. This measure was
intended, of course, to compel the funding
of the currency, and it had that effect to
some extent, without doubt. Much of the old
currency remained in circulation,
<pb id="eggleston91" n="91"/>
however, even after the new notes
were issued. For a time people calculated
the discount, in passing and receiving the old
paper, but as the new notes showed an
undiminished tendency to still further
depreciation, there were people, not a few,
who spared themselves the trouble of
making the distinction.</p>
          <p>I am sometimes asked at what time
prices attained their highest point in the
Confederacy, and I find that memory fails to
answer the question satisfactorily. They
were about as high as they could be in the
fall of 1863, and I should be disposed to fix
upon that as the time when the climax
was reached, but for my consciousness that
the law of constant appreciation was a fixed
one throughout the war. The financial
condition got steadily worse to the end. I
believe the highest price, relatively, I ever
saw paid, was for a pair of boots. A cavalry
officer, entering a little country store,
found there one pair of boots which
<pb id="eggleston92" n="92"/>
fitted him. He inquired the price. “Two
hundred dollars,” said the merchant. A five
hundred dollar bill was offered, but the
merchant, having no smaller bills, could not
change it. “Never mind,” said the cavalier,
“I'll take the boots anyhow. Keep the
change; I never let a little matter of three
hundred dollars stand in the way of a trade.”</p>
          <p>That was on the day before Lee's
surrender, but it would not have been an
impossible occurrence at any time during the
preceding year. The money was of so little
value that we parted with it gladly whenever
it would purchase anything at all desirable. I
cheerfully paid five dollars for a little salt, at
Petersburg, in August, 1864, and being
thirsty drank my last two dollars in a half-pint
of cider.</p>
          <p>The government's course in levying a tax
in kind, as the only possible way of making
the taxation amount to anything, led
speedily to the adoption of a similar plan, as far
<pb id="eggleston93" n="93"/>
as possible, by the people. A physician would
order from his planter friend ten or twenty visits'
worth of corn, and the transaction was a
perfectly intelligible one to both. The visits
would be counted at antewar rates, and the
corn estimated by the same standard. In the
early spring of 1865 I wanted a horse, and a
friend having one to spare, I sent for the
animal, offering to pay whatever the owner
should ask for it. He could not fix a price,
having literally no standard of value to
which he could appeal, but he sent me the
horse, writing, in reply to my note,  -  </p>
          <p>“Take the horse, and when the war shall
be over, if we are both alive and you are
able, give me as good a one in return. Don't
send any note or due-bill. It might
complicate matters if either should die.”</p>
          <p>A few months later, I paid my debt by
returning the very horse I had bought. I
give this incident merely to show how
utterly without financial compass or rudder
we were.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston94" n="94"/>
          <p>How did people manage to live during
such a time? I am often asked; and as I look
back at the history of those years, I can
hardly persuade myself that the problem
was solved at all. A large part of the people,
however, was in the army, and drew rations
from the government. During the early
years of the war, officers were not given
rations, but were allowed to buy provisions
from the commissaries at government
prices. Subsequently, however, when
provisions became so scarce that it was
necessary to limit the amount consumed by
officers as well as that eaten by the men,
the purchase system was abolished, and the
whole army was fed upon daily rations. The
country people raised upon their plantations
all the necessaries of life, and were
generally allowed to keep enough of them to
live on, the remainder being taken by the
subsistence officers for army use. The
problem of a salt supply, on which depended
the production of meat, was solved in
<pb id="eggleston95" n="95"/>
part by the establishment of small salt
factories along the coast, and in part by
Governor Letcher's vigorous management
of the works in southwestern Virginia, and
his wise distribution of the product along the
various lines of railroad.</p>
          <p>In the cities, living was not by any
means so easy as in the country. Business
was paralyzed, and abundant as money
was, it seems almost incredible that city
people got enough of it to live on. Very
many of them were employed, however, in
various capacities, in the arsenals,
departments, bureaus, etc., and these were
allowed to buy rations at fixed rates, after
the post-office clerks in Richmond had
brought matters to a crisis by resigning their
clerkships to go into the army, because they
could not support life on their salaries of
nine thousand dollars a year. For the rest,
if people had anything to sell, they got
enormous prices for it, and could live a while on
the proceeds. Above all, a kindly, helpful spirit
<pb id="eggleston96" n="96"/>
was developed by the common suffering,
and this, without doubt, kept many
thousands of people from starvation. Those
who had anything shared it freely with
those who had nothing. There was no
selfish looking forward, and no
hoarding for the time to come. During
those terrible last years, the future had
nothing of pleasantness in its face, and
people learned not to think of it at all. To get
through today was the only care. Nobody
formed any plans or laid by any money for
to-morrow or next week or next year, and
indeed to most of us there really seemed to
be no future. I remember the start it gave
me when a clergyman, visiting camp, asked
a number of us whether our long stay in
defensive works did not afford us an
excellent opportunity to study with a view to
our professional life after the war. We were
not used to think of ourselves as possible
survivors of a struggle which was every
day perceptibly thinning our ranks.
<pb id="eggleston97" n="97"/>
The coming of ultimate failure we saw
clearly enough, but the future beyond was a
blank. The subject was naturally not a
pleasant one, and by common consent it
was always avoided in conversation, until at
last we learned to avoid it in thought as well.
We waited gloomily for the end, but did not
care particularly to speculate upon the
question when and how the end was to
come. There was a vague longing for rest,
which found vent now and then in wild
newspaper stories of signs and omens
portending the close of the war, but beyond
this the matter was hardly ever discussed.
We had early forbidden ourselves to think of
any end to the struggle except a successful
one, and that being now an impossibility, we
avoided the subject altogether. The
newspaper stories to which reference is
made above were of the wildest and
absurdest sort. One Richmond paper issued
an extra, in which it was gravely stated that
there was a spring near Fredericksburg
<pb id="eggleston98" n="98"/>
which had ceased to flow thirty days
before the surrender of the British at
Yorktown, thirty days before the
termination of the war of 1812, and thirty
days before the Mexican war ended; and
that “this singularly prophetic fountain has
now again ceased to pour forth its waters.”
At another time a hen near Lynchburg laid
an egg, the newspapers said, on which were
traced, in occult letters, the words, “peace in
ninety days.”</p>
          <p>Will the reader believe that with gold at a
hundred and twenty-five for one, or twelve
thousand four hundred per cent. premium;
when every day made the hopelessness of
the struggle more apparent; when our last
man was in the field; when the resources of
the country were visibly at an end, there
were financial theorists who honestly
believed that by a mere trick of legislation
the currency could be brought back to par?
I heard some of these people explain their
plan during a two days' stay in Richmond.
<pb id="eggleston99" n="99"/>
Gold, they said, is an inconvenient currency
always, and nobody wants it, except as a
basis. The government has some gold,  -  
several millions in fact,  -  and if Congress
will only be bold enough to declare the
treasury notes redeemable at par in coin,
it we shall have no further difficulty with our
finances. So long as notes are redeemable in
gold at the option of the holder, nobody
wants them redeemed. Let the government
say to the people, We will redeem the
currency whenever you wish, and nobody
except a few timid and unpatriotic people
will care to change their convenient for an
inconvenient money. The gold which the
government holds will suffice to satisfy
these timid ones, and there will be an end of
high prices and depreciated currency. The
government can then issue as much more
currency as circumstances may make
necessary, and strong in our confidence in
ourselves we shall be the richest people on
earth; we shall have <hi rend="italics">created</hi> the untold
wealth which our currency represents.</p>
          <pb id="eggleston100" n="100"/>
          <p>I am not jesting. This is, as nearly as
I can repeat it, the utterance of a member
of the Confederate Congress made in my
presence in a private parlor. If the reader
thinks the man was insane, I beg him to look
over the reports of the debates on financial
matters which have been held in Washington.</p>
          <p>The effects of the extreme depreciation
of the currency were sometimes almost
ludicrous. One of my friends, a Richmond
lady, narrowly escaped very serious trouble
in an effort to practice a wise economy.
Anything for which the dealers did not ask
an outrageously high price seemed
wonderfully cheap always, and she, at least,
lacked the self-control necessary to abstain
from buying largely whenever she found
anything the price of which was lower than
she had supposed it would be. Going into
market one morning with “stimulated ideas of
prices,” as she phrased it, the consequence
of having paid a thousand dollars
<pb id="eggleston101" n="101"/>
for a barrel of flour, she was surprised to
find nearly everything selling for
considerably less than she had expected.
Thinking that for some unexplained cause
there was a temporary depression in prices,
she purchased pretty largely in a good many
directions, buying, indeed, several things for
which she had almost no use at all, and
buying considerably more than she needed
of other articles. As she was quitting the
market on foot,  -  for it had become
disreputable in Richmond to ride in a
carriage, and the ladies would not do it on
any account, she was tapped on the
shoulder by an officer who told her she
was under arrest, for buying in market to sell
again. As the lady was well known to
prominent people she was speedily released,
but she thereafter curbed her propensity to
buy freely of cheap things. Buying to sell
again had been forbidden under severe
penalties,  -  an absolutely necessary measure
for the protection of the people against the
<pb id="eggleston102" n="102"/>
rapacity of the hucksters, who, going early
into the markets, would buy literally
everything there, and by agreement among
themselves double or quadruple the already
exorbitant rates. It became necessary also
to suppress the gambling-houses in the
interest of the half-starved people. At such
a time, of course, gambling was a very
common vice, and the gamblers made
Richmond their head-quarters. It was the
custom of the proprietors of these
establishments to set costly suppers in their
parlors every night, for the purpose of
attracting visitors likely to become victims.
For these suppers they must have the best
of everything without stint, and their lavish
rivalry in the poorly stocked markets had the
effect of advancing prices to a dangerous
point. To suppress the gambling-houses was
the sole remedy, and it was only by
uncommonly severe measures that the
suppression could be accomplished. It was
therefore enacted that any one found
<pb id="eggleston103" n="103"/>
guilty of keeping a gambling-house should be
publicly whipped upon the bare back, and as
the infliction of the penalty in one or two
instances effectually and permanently broke
up the business of gambling, even in the
disorganized and demoralized state in
which society then was, it may be said with
confidence that whipping is the one certain
remedy for this evil. Whether it be not, in
ordinary cases, worse than the evil which it
cures, it is not our business just now to
inquire.</p>
          <p>The one thing which we were left
almost wholly without, during the war, was
literature. Nobody thought of importing
books through the blockade, to any adequate
extent, and the facilities for publishing them,
even if we had had authors to write them, were
very poor indeed. A Mobile firm reprinted a
few of the more popular books of the time,
Les Misérables, Great Expectations, etc.,
and I have a pamphlet edition of Owen
Meredith's Tannhäauser, bound in
<pb id="eggleston104" n="104"/>
coarse wall-paper, for which I paid seven
dollars, in Charleston. Singularly enough, I
bought at the same time a set of Dickens's
works, of English make, well printed and
bound in black cloth, for four dollars a
volume, a discrepancy which I am wholly
unable to explain. In looking through a file of
the Richmond Examiner extending over
most of the year 1864, I find but one book
of any sort advertised, and the price of that,
a duodecimo volume of only 72 pages, was
five dollars, the publishers promising to send
it by mail, post-paid, on receipt of the price.</p>
          <p>Towards the last, as I have already said,
resort was had frequently to first principles,
and bartering, or “payment in kind,” as it
was called, became common, especially in
those cases in which it was necessary to
announce prices in advance. To fix a price for
the future in Confederate money when it was
daily becoming more and more exaggeratedly
worthless, would have been sheer
<pb id="eggleston105" n="105"/>
folly; and so educational institutions, country
boarding-houses, etc., advertised for
patronage at certain prices, payment to be
made in provisions at the rates prevailing in
September, 1860. In the advertisement of
Hampden Sidney College, in the Examiner
for October 4, 1864, I find it stated that
students may get board in private families at
about eight dollars a month, payable in this
way. The strong contrast between the
prices of 1860 and those of 1864 is shown
by a statement, in the same advertisement,
that the students who may get board at eight
dollars a month in provisions, can buy wood
at twenty-five dollars a cord and get their
washing done for seven dollars and fifty
cents a dozen pieces.</p>
          <p>This matter of prices was frequently
made a subject for jesting in private, but for
the most part it was carefully avoided in the
newspapers. It was too ominous of evil to
be a fit topic of editorial discussion on
ordinary occasions. As with the accounts
<pb id="eggleston106" n="106"/>
of battles in which our arms were not
successful, necessary references to the
condition of the finances were crowded into
a corner, as far out of sight as possible. The
Examiner, being a sort of newspaper
Ishmael, did now and then bring the subject
up, however, and on one occasion it
denounced with some fierceness the
charges prevailing in the schools; and I
quote a passage from Prof. Sidney H.
Owens's reply which is interesting as a
summary of the condition of things in the
South at that time:  -  </p>
          <p>“The charges made for tuition are about
five or six times as high as in 1860. Now,
sir, your shoemaker, carpenter, butcher,
market man, etc., demand from twenty, to
thirty, to forty times as much as in 1860.
Will you show me a civilian who is charging
only six times the prices charged in 1860,
except the teacher only? As to the
amassing of fortunes by teachers, spoken of
in your article, make your calculations,
<pb id="eggleston107" n="107"/>
sir, and you will find that to be almost an
absurdity, since they pay from twenty to
forty prices for everything used, and are
denounced exorbitant and unreasonable in
demanding five or six prices for their own
labor and skill.”</p>
          <p>There were compensations, however.
When gold was at twelve thousand per
cent. premium with us, we had the
consolation of knowing that it was in the
neighborhood of one hundred above par
in New York, and a Richmond paper of
September 22, 1864, now before me, fairly
chuckles over the high prices prevailing at
the North, in a two-line paragraph which
says, “Tar is selling in New York at two
dollars a pound. It used to cost eighty cents
a barrel.” That paragraph doubtless made
many a five-dollar beefsteak palatable.</p>
        </div2>
        <pb id="eggleston108" n="108"/>
        <div2>
          <head>CHAPTER V.<lb/>THE CHEVALIER OF THE LOST CAUSE.</head>
          <p>THE queer people who devote their energies to
the collection of autographs have a habit, as
everybody whose name has been three times in
print must have discovered, of soliciting from their
victim “an autograph with a sentiment,” and the
unfortunate one is expected, in such cases, to say
something worthy of himself, something especially
which shall be eminently characteristic, revealing, in
a single sentence, the whole man, or woman, as the
case may be. How large a proportion of the efforts to do
this are measurably successful, nobody but a collector
of the sort referred to can say; but it seems probable
that the most characteristic autograph “sentiments”
are those which are written of the writer's own motion
<pb id="eggleston109" n="109"/>
and not of malice aforethought. I remember
seeing a curious collection of these once, many
of which were certainly not unworthy the men
who wrote them. One read, “I. O. U. fifty
pounds lost at play,  -  CHARLES JAMES FOX;
and another was a memorandum of sundry
wagers laid, signed by the Right Honorable
Richard Brinsley Sheridan. These, I thought,
bore the impress of their authors' character, and
it is at the least doubtful whether either of the
distinguished gentlemen would have done half
so well in answer to a modest request for a
sentiment and a signature.</p>
          <p>In the great dining-hall of the Briars, an
old-time mansion in the Shenandoah Valley, the
residence of Mr. John Esten Cooke, there hangs
a portrait of a broad-shouldered cavalier, and
beneath is written, in the hand of the cavalier
himself,</p>
          <lg>
            <l>“<hi rend="italics">Yours to count on,</hi></l>
            <l>J. E. B. STUART”</l>
          </lg>
          <p>an autograph sentiment which seems to me
<pb id="eggleston110" n="110"/>
a very perfect one in its way. There was no
point in Stuart's character more strongly
marked than the one here hinted at. He was
“yours to count on” always: your friend if
possible, your enemy if you would have it
so, but your friend or your enemy “to count
on,” in any case. A franker, more
transparent nature, it is impossible to
conceive. What he was he professed to be.
That which he thought, he said, and his habit
of thinking as much good as he could of
those about him served to make his
frankness of speech a great friend-winner.</p>
          <p>I saw him for the first time when he was
a colonel, in command of the little squadron
of horsemen known as the first regiment of
Virginia cavalry. The company to which I
belonged was assigned to this regiment
immediately after the evacuation of Harper's
Ferry by the Confederates. General Johnston's
army was at Winchester, and the Federal
force under General Patterson
<pb id="eggleston111" n="111"/>
lay around Martinsburg. Stuart, with his
three or four hundred men, was encamped
at Bunker Hill, about midway between the
two, and thirteen miles from support of any
kind. He had chosen this position as a
convenient one from which to observe the
movements of the enemy, and the tireless
activity which marked his subsequent career
so strongly had already begun. As he
afterwards explained, it was his purpose to
train and school his men, quite as much as
anything else, that prompted the greater part
of his madcap expeditions at this time, and
if there be virtue in practice as a means
of perfection, he was certainly an excellent
school-master.</p>
          <p>My company arrived at the camp about
noon, after a march of three or four days,
having traveled twenty miles that morning.
Stuart, whom we encountered as we
entered the camp, assigned us our position.
and ordered our tents pitched. Our captain,
who was even worse disciplined than
<pb id="eggleston112" n="112"/>
we were, seeing a much more comfortable
camping-place than the muddy one
assigned to us, and being a comfort-loving
gentleman, proceeded to lay out a model
camp at a distance of fifty yards from the
spot indicated. It was not long before the
colonel particularly wished to consult with
that captain, and after the consultation the
volunteer officer was firmly convinced that
all West Point graduates were martinets,
with no knowledge whatever of the courtesies
due from one gentleman to another.</p>
          <p>We were weary after our long
journey, and disposed to welcome the
prospect of rest which our arrival in the
camp held out. But resting, as we soon
learned, had small place in our colonel's
tactics. We had been in camp perhaps an
hour, when an order came directing that
the company be divided into three parts,
each under command of a lieutenant, and that
these report immediately for duty. Reporting,
we were directed to scout through the country
<pb id="eggleston113" n="113"/>
around Martinsburg, going as near the town
as possible, and to give battle to any cavalry
force we might meet. Here was a pretty
lookout, certainly! Our officers knew not one
inch of the country, and might fall into all
sorts of traps and ambuscades; and what if
we should meet a cavalry force greatly
superior to our own? This West Point
colonel was rapidly forfeiting our good
opinion. Our lieutenants were brave fellows,
however, and they led us boldly if ignorantly,
almost up to the very gates of the town
occupied by the enemy. We saw some
cavalry but met none, their orders not being
so peremptorily belligerent, perhaps, as ours
were; wherefore they gave us no chance to fight
them. The next morning our unreasonable colonel
again ordered us to mount, in spite of the fact that
there were companies in the camp which had done
nothing at all the day before. This time he led us
himself, taking pains to get us as nearly as possible
<pb id="eggleston114" n="114"/>
surrounded by infantry, and then laughingly
telling us that our chance for getting out of
the difficulty, except by cutting our way
through, was an exceedingly small one. I
think we began about this time to suspect
that we were learning something, and that
this reckless colonel was trying to teach us.
But that he was a hare-brained fellow,
lacking the caution belonging to a
commander, we were unanimously agreed.
He led us out of the place at a rapid gait,
before the one gap in the enemy's lines
could be closed, and then jauntily led us
into one or two other traps, before taking
us back to camp.</p>
          <p>But it was not until General Patterson
began his feint against Winchester that our
colonel had full opportunity to give us his
field lectures. When the advance began,
and our pickets were driven in, the
most natural thing to do, in our view of the
situation, was to fall back upon our infantry
supports at Winchester, and I remember
<pb id="eggleston115" n="115"/>
hearing various expressions of doubt as to
the colonel's sanity when, instead of falling
back, he marched his handful of men right
up to the advancing lines, and ordered us to
dismount. The Federal skirmish line was
coming toward us at a double-quick, and we
were set going toward it at a like rate of
speed, leaving our horses hundreds of yards
to the rear. We could see that the
skirmishers alone outnumbered us three or
four times, and it really seemed that our
colonel meant to sacrifice his command
deliberately. He waited until the infantry was
within about two hundred yards of us, we
being in the edge of a little grove, and they
on the other side of an open field. Then
Stuart cried out, “Backwards  -   march!
steady, men,  -  keep your faces to the
enemy!” and we marched in that way
through the timber, delivering our shot-gun
fire slowly as we fell back toward our
horses. Then mounting, with the skirmishers
almost upon us, we retreated, not
<pb id="eggleston116" n="116"/>
hurriedly, but at a slow trot, which the
colonel would on no account permit us to
change into a gallop. Taking us out into the
main road he halted us in column, with our
backs to the enemy.</p>
          <p>“Attention!” he cried. “Now I want to talk
to you, men. You are brave fellows, and
patriotic ones too, but you are ignorant of
this kind of work, and I am teaching you. I
want you to observe that a good man on a
good horse can never be caught. Another
thing: cavalry can <hi rend="italics">trot</hi> away from anything,
and a gallop is a gait unbecoming a soldier,
unless he is going toward the enemy.
Remember that. We gallop toward the
enemy, and trot away, always. Steady now!
don't break ranks!”</p>
          <p>And as the words left his lips a shell from
a battery half a mile to the rear hissed over
our heads.</p>
          <p>“There,” he resumed. “I've been waiting
for that, and watching those fellows. I knew
they'd shoot too high, and I wanted you to
learn how shells sound.”</p>
          <pb id="eggleston117" n="117"/>
          <p>We spent the next day or two literally
within the Federal lines. We were shelled,
skirmished with, charged, and surrounded
scores of times, until we learned to hold in
high regard our colonel's masterly skill in
getting into and out of perilous positions. He
seemed to blunder into them in sheer
recklessness, but in getting out he showed us
the quality of his genius; and before we
reached Manassas, we had learned, among
other things, to entertain a feeling closely
akin to worship for our brilliant and daring
leader. We had begun to understand, too,
how much force he meant to give to his
favorite dictum that the cavalry is the eye of
the army.</p>
          <p>His restless activity was one, at least, of
the qualities which enabled him to win the
reputation he achieved so rapidly. He could
never be still. He was rarely ever in camp at
all, and he never showed a sign of fatigue.
He led almost everything. Even
after he became a general officer,
<pb id="eggleston118" n="118"/>
with well-nigh an army of horsemen under
his command, I frequently followed him as
my leader in a little party of half a dozen
troopers, who might as well have gone with
a sergeant on the duty assigned them; and
once I was his only follower on a scouting
expedition, of which he, a brigadier-general
at the time, was the commander. I had been
detailed to do some clerical work at his
head-quarters, and, having finished the task
assigned me, was waiting in the piazza of
the house he occupied, for somebody to give
me further orders, when Stuart came out.</p>
          <p>“Is that your horse?” he asked, going up
to the animal and examining him minutely.</p>
          <p>I replied that he was, and upon being
questioned further informed him that I did
not wish to sell my steed. Turning to me
suddenly, he said,  -  </p>
          <p>“Let's slip off on a scout, then; I'll ride
your horse and you can ride mine. I
<pb id="eggleston119" n="119"/>
want to try your beast's paces;” and
mounting, we galloped away. Where or how
far he intended to go I did not know. He
was enamored of my horse, and rode, I
suppose, for the pleasure of riding an animal
which pleased him. We passed outside our
picket line, and then, keeping in the woods,
rode within that of the Union army.
Wandering about in a purposeless way, we
got a near view of some of the Federal
camps, and finally finding ourselves objects
of attention on the part of some well-mounted
cavalry in blue uniforms, we rode
rapidly down a road toward our own lines,
our pursuers riding quite as rapidly
immediately behind us.</p>
          <p>“General,” I cried presently, “there is a
Federal picket post on the road just ahead
of us. Had we not better oblique into the
woods?”</p>
          <p>“Oh no. They won't expect us from this
direction, and we can ride over them before
they make up their minds who we are.”</p>
          <pb id="eggleston120" n="120"/>
          <p>Three minutes later we rode at full
speed through the corporal's guard on
picket, and were a hundred yards or more
away before they could level a gun at us.
Then half a dozen bullets whistled about our
ears, but the cavalier paid no attention to
them.</p>
          <p>“Did you ever time this horse for a
half-mile?” was all he had to say.</p>
          <p>Expeditions of this singular sort were by
no means uncommon occurrences with him.
I am told by a friend who served on his
staff, that he would frequently take one of
his aids and ride away otherwise unattended
into the enemy's lines; and oddly enough this
was one of his ways of making friends with
any officer to whom his rough, boyish ways
had given offense. He would take the
officer with him, and when they were alone
would throw his arms around his companion,
and say,  -  </p>
          <p>“My dear fellow, you mustn't be angry
with me,  -  you know I love you.”</p>
          <p>His boyishness was always apparent, and
<pb id="eggleston121" n="121"/>
the affectionate nature of the man was
hardly less so, even in public. He was
especially fond of children, and I remember
seeing him in the crowded waiting-room of
the railroad station at Gordonsville with a
babe on each arm; a great, bearded warrior,
with his plumed hat, and with golden spurs
clanking at his heels, engaged in a mad
frolic with all the little people in the room,
charging them right and left with the pair of
babies which he had captured from their
unknown mothers.</p>
          <p>It was on the day of my ride with him that
I heard him express his views of the war
and his singular aspiration for himself. It
was almost immediately after General
McClellan assumed command of the army
of the Potomac, and while we were rather
eagerly expecting him to attack our strongly
fortified position at Centreville. Stuart was
talking with some members of his staff, with
whom he had been wrestling a minute
before. He said something about
<pb id="eggleston122" n="122"/>
what they could do by way of amusement
when they should go into winter-quarters.</p>
          <p>“That is to say,” he continued, “if George
B. McClellan ever allows us to go into
winter-quarters at all.”</p>
          <p>“Why, general? Do you think he will
advance before spring?” asked one of the
officers.</p>
          <p>“Not against Centreville,” replied the
general. “He has too much sense for that,
and I think he knows the shortest road to
Richmond, too. If I am not greatly mistaken,
we shall hear of him presently on his way up
the James River.”</p>
          <p>In this prediction, as the reader knows, he
was right. The conversation then passed to
the question of results.</p>
          <p>“I regard it as a foregone conclusion,”
said Stuart, “that we shall ultimately whip
the Yankees. We are bound to believe that,
anyhow; but the war is going to be a long
and terrible one, first. We've only just
begun it, and very few of us will see
<pb id="eggleston123" n="123"/>
the end. <hi rend="italics">All I ask of fate is that I may be killed
leading a cavalry charge.</hi>”</p>
          <p>The remark was not a boastful or
seemingly insincere one. It was made
quietly, cheerfully, almost eagerly, and it
impressed me at the time with the feeling
that the man's idea of happiness was what
the French call glory, and that in his eyes
there was no glory like that of dying in one
of the tremendous onsets which he knew so
well how to make. His wish was granted, as
we know. He received his death-wound at
the head of his troopers.</p>
          <p>With those about him he was as
affectionate as a woman, and his little
boyish ways are remembered lovingly by
those of his military household whom I have
met since the war came to an end. On one
occasion, just after a battle, he handed his
coat to a member of his staff, saying,  -  </p>
          <p>“Try that on, captain, and see how it fits
you.”</p>
          <p>The garment fitted reasonably well, and
the general continued,  -  </p>
          <pb id="eggleston124" n="124"/>
          <p>“Pull off two of the stars, and wear the
coat to the war department, and tell the
people there to make you a major.”</p>
          <p>The officer did as his chief bade him.
Removing two of the three