<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite.dtd" [
<!ENTITY % external-entities SYSTEM "./extEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY % internal-entities SYSTEM "./intEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY gord6 SYSTEM "gord6.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord32 SYSTEM "gord32.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord44 SYSTEM "gord44.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord68 SYSTEM "gord68.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gordsp SYSTEM "gordsp.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gordtp SYSTEM "gordtp.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord80 SYSTEM "gord80.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord88 SYSTEM "gord88.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord96 SYSTEM "gord96.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gordxxi SYSTEM "gordxxi.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord102 SYSTEM "gord102.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord120 SYSTEM "gord120.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord220 SYSTEM "gord220.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord152 SYSTEM "gord152.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord156 SYSTEM "gord156.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord320 SYSTEM "gord320.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord240 SYSTEM "gord240.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord241 SYSTEM "gord241.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord242 SYSTEM "gord242.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord249 SYSTEM "gord249.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord168 SYSTEM "gord168.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord172 SYSTEM "gord172.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord332 SYSTEM "gord332.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gordcv SYSTEM "gordcv.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord260 SYSTEM "gord260.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gordfp SYSTEM "gordfp.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord450 SYSTEM "gord450.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord292 SYSTEM "gord292.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord386 SYSTEM "gord386.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord10 SYSTEM "gord10.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY gord22 SYSTEM "gord22.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
]>
<TEI.2>
  <teiHeader type="" status="new">
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title><emph rend="bold">Reminiscences of the Civil War:</emph>
Electronic Edition.</title>
        <author>John Brown Gordon, 1832-1904</author>
        <funder>Funding from the Library of Congress/Ameritech National 
Digital Library Competition supported the electronic publication of 
this title.</funder>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text scanned (OCR) by</resp>
          <name id="cg">Jennifer Kellerman</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Images scanned by</resp>
          <name>Jill Kuhn</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
          <name id="ns">Jill Kuhn and Natalia Smith</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <editionStmt>
        <edition>First edition,
<date>1999</date></edition>
      </editionStmt>
      <extent>ca. 1MB</extent>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>Academic Affairs Library, UNC-CH</publisher>
        <pubPlace>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,</pubPlace>
        <date>1999.</date>
        <availability status="unknown">
          <p>© This work is the property of the University of
North Carolina 
at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research,
teaching and personal use as long as this statement of availability is
included in the text.</p>
        </availability>
      </publicationStmt>
      <notesStmt>
        <note anchored="yes">Call number  E470 .G66 1904c
(Davis Library, UNC-CH)</note>
      </notesStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Reminiscences of the Civil War</title>
          <author>Gordon, John B.</author>
          <imprint>
            <pubPlace>New York</pubPlace>
            <publisher>Charles Scribner's Sons</publisher>
            <pubPlace>Atlanta</pubPlace>
            <publisher>The Martin &amp; Hoyt Co. </publisher>
            <date>1904</date>
          </imprint>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <projectDesc>
        <p>The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-CH
digitization project, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South, Beginnings to 1920.</hi></p>
      </projectDesc>
      <editorialDecl>
        <p>Any hyphens occurring in line breaks have been 
removed, and the trailing part of a word has been joined to 
the preceding line.</p>
        <p>All quotation marks and ampersand have been transcribed as
entity references.</p>
        <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as ” 
and “
respectively.</p>
        <p>All single right and left quotation marks are encoded as ’
 and ‘ respectively.</p>
        <p>Indentation in lines has not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Running titles have not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Spell-check and verification made against printed text 
using Author/Editor (SoftQuad) and Microsoft Word spell check programs.</p>
      </editorialDecl>
      <classDecl>
        <taxonomy id="lcsh">
          <bibl>
            <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings, </title>
          </bibl>
        </taxonomy>
      </classDecl>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <langUsage>
        <language id="fre">French</language>
        <language id="ita">Italian</language>
        <language id="lat">Latin</language>
      </langUsage>
      <textClass>
        <keywords scheme="lcsh">
          <list type="simple">
            <item>Gordon, John Brown, 1832-1904.</item>
            <item>Confederate States of America. Army. Alabama Infantry Regiment,
6th. Company I.</item>
            <item>Generals -- Confederate States of America -- Biography.</item>
            <item>Confederate States of America. Army. -- Officers --
Biography.</item>
            <item>United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Military
life.</item>
            <item>United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 --
Campaigns.</item>
            <item>United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Personal
narratives, Confederate.</item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change>
        <date>1999-02-12,</date>
        <respStmt>
          <name> Celine Noel and Wanda Gunther </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> revised TEIHeader and created catalog 
record for the electronic edition.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1999-01-28, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Natalia Smith,</name>
          <resp>project manager, </resp>
        </respStmt>
        <item> finished TEI-conformant encoding and final
proofing.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1999-01-26, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Jill Kuhn</name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> finished TEI/SGML encoding.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1999-01-20, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Jennifer Kellerman</name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> finished scanning (OCR) and proofing.</item>
      </change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <front>
      <div1 type="cover image">
        <p>
          <figure id="cover" entity="gordcv">
            <p>[Cover Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="spine image">
        <p>
          <figure id="spine" entity="gordsp">
            <p>[Spine Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="frontispiece image">
        <p>
          <figure id="frontis" entity="gordfp">
            <p>GENERAL JOHN B. GORDON<lb/>From a photograph taken at the close of the war, when he was thirty-three years of age.<lb/>[Frontispiece Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="title page image">
        <p>
          <figure id="title" entity="gordtp">
            <p>[Title Page Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <titlePage>
        <docEdition>
          <hi rend="italics">Memorial Edition</hi>
        </docEdition>
        <docTitle>
          <titlePart type="main">REMINISCENCES OF THE CIVIL WAR</titlePart>
        </docTitle>
        <byline>BY</byline>
        <docAuthor>GENERAL JOHN B. GORDON<lb/>
OF THE CONFEDERATE ARMY</docAuthor>
        <titlePart type="subtitle">WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY<lb/>
GENERAL STEPHEN D. LEE<lb/>
COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF THE UNITED<lb/>
CONFEDERATE VETERANS</titlePart>
        <titlePart type="subtitle">MEMORIAL ACCOUNT BY<lb/>
FRANCES GORDON SMITH</titlePart>
        <docEdition>
          <hi rend="italics">Illustrated</hi>
        </docEdition>
        <docImprint><pubPlace>NEW YORK</pubPlace>
<publisher>CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS</publisher>
<pubPlace>ATLANTA</pubPlace>
<publisher>THE MARTIN &amp;  HOYT CO.</publisher>
<docDate>1904</docDate> </docImprint>
        <pb id="gordverso" n="verso"/>
        <docImprint><docDate>Copyright, 1903. by</docDate>
<publisher>CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS</publisher>
<docDate><hi rend="italics">Published October, 1903</hi></docDate></docImprint>
      </titlePage>
      <div1 type="table of contents">
        <pb id="gordv" n="v"/>
        <head>CONTENTS</head>
        <list type="simple">
          <item>I  MY FIRST COMMAND AND THE OUTBREAK OF THE WAR
<lb/>
A company of mountaineers—Joe Brown's pikes—The Raccoon
Roughs—The first Rebel yell—A flag presented to the company— 
Arrival at Montgomery, Alabama—Analysis of the causes of the war— 
Slavery's part in it—Liberty in the Union of the States, and liberty in
the independence of the States . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord3">3</ref></item>
          <item>II  THE TRIP FROM CORINTH
<lb/>
The Raccoon Roughs made a part of the Sixth Alabama—The journey to
Virginia—Families divided in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Missouri—A
father captured by a son in battle—The military spirit in 
Virginia—Andrew Johnson and Parson Brownlow Union leaders
 in Tennessee—Johnson's
narrowness afterward exhibited as President . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord26">26</ref>
</item>
          <item>III  BULL RUN OR MANASSAS
<lb/>
The first great battle of the war—A series of surprises—Mishaps
and mistakes of the Confederates—Beauregard's lost order—General
Ewell's rage—The most eccentric officer in the Confederate army— 
Anecdotes of his career—The wild panic of the Union troops—Senseless
frights that cannot be explained—Illustrated at Cedar Creek . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord37">37</ref></item>
          <item>IV  THE SPRING OF 1862—BATTLE OF SEVEN PINES OR FAIR OAKS
<lb/>
Indomitable Americanism, North and South—Rally of the North
after Bull Run—Severity of winter quarters in Virginia— 
McClellan's army landed at Yorktown—Retreat of the Confederates— 
On the Chickahominy—Terrible slaughter at Seven Pines—A brigade
commander . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord47">47</ref></item>
          <item>V  PRESENTIMENTS AND FATALISM AMONG SOLDIERS
<lb/>
Wonderful instances of prophetic foresight—Colonel Lomax
predicts his death—The vision of a son dying two days before
<pb id="gordvi" n="vi"/>
it happened—General Ramseur's furlough—Colonel 
Augustus Gordon's calm
announcement of his death—Instances of misplaced fatalism—General
D. H. Hill's indifference to danger  . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord60">60</ref></item>
          <item>VI  BATTLE OF MALVERN HILL
<lb/>
Continuous fighting between McClellan's and Lee's armies—Hurried
burial of the dead—How “Stonewall” Jackson got his 
name—The
secret of his wonderful power—The predicament of my command at
Malvern Hill—A fruitless wait for re-enforcements—Character
the basis of true courage—Anecdote of General Polk . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord70">70</ref></item>
          <item>VII  ANTIETAM
<lb/>
Restoration of McClellan to command of the Federals—My command
at General Lee's centre—Remarkable series of bayonet charges by the
Union troops—How the centre was held—Bravery of the Union
commander—A long struggle for life  . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord80">80</ref></item>
          <item>VIII  CHANCELLORSVILLE
<lb/>
A long convalescence—Enlivened by the author of “Georgia
Scenes”—The movement upon Hooker's army at 
Chancellorsville— Remarkable interview between Lee 
and Stonewall Jackson—The
secret of Jackson's character—The storming of Marye's 
Heights—Some famous war-horses . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord92">92</ref></item>
          <item>IX  WAR BY THE BRAVE AGAINST THE BRAVE
<lb/>
The spirit of good-fellowship between Union and Confederate 
soldiers— Disappearance of personal hatred as the war progressed—The Union
officer who attended a Confederate dance—American chivalry at
Vicksburg—Trading between pickets on the Rappahannock—Incidents
of the bravery of color-bearers on both sides—General Curtis's 
kindness— A dash for life cheered by the enemy . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord105">105</ref></item>
          <item>X  RETROSPECTIVE VIEW OF LEADERS AND EVENTS
<lb/>
Confederate victories up to the winter of 1863—Southern
confidence in ultimate independence—Progress of Union armies in
the West—Fight for the control of the Mississippi—General Butler
in possession of New Orleans—The new era in naval 
construction—Significance of the battle of the <hi rend="italics">Monitor</hi> and <hi rend="italics">Merrimac</hi>—Great
leaders who had come into prominence in both armies—The death of
Albert Sidney Johnston—General Lee the most unassuming of great
Commanders . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord120">120</ref></item>
          <item>XI  GETTYSBURG
<lb/>
Why General Lee crossed the Potomac—The movement into
Pennsylvania—Incidents of the march to the Susquehanna— 
<pb id="gordvii" n="vii"/>
The first day at Gettysburg—Union forces driven back—The key of the
Position—Why the Confederates did not seize Cemetery Ridge—A
defence of General Lee's strategy—The fight at Little Round Top—The
immortal charge of Pickett's men—General Meade's 
deliberate pursuit—Lee's request to be relieved . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord137">137</ref></item>
          <item>XII  VICKSBURG AND HELENA
<lb/>
The four most crowded and decisive days of the war—Vicksburg the
culmination of Confederate disaster—Frequent change of commanders in
the Trans-Mississippi Department—General Grant's tunnel at 
Fort Hill—Courage of Pemberton's soldiers—Explosion 
of the mine—Hand-to-hand
conflict—The surrender . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord177">177</ref></item>
          <item>XIII  FROM VICKSBURG AND GETTYSBURG TO CHICKAMAUGA
<lb/>
Lee's army again headed toward Washington—He decides not to cross
the Potomac at the opening of winter—Meade's 
counter-attack—Capture of a redoubt on the 
Rappahannock—A criticism of Secretary
Stanton—General Bragg's strategy—How Rosecrans compelled the
evacuation of Chattanooga . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord188">188</ref></item>
          <item>XIV  CHICKAMAUGA
<lb/>
One of the bloodiest battles of modern times—Comparison with
other great battles of the world—Movements of both armies before
the collision—A birds-eye view—The night after the battle—General
Thomas's brave stand—How the assault of Longstreet's wing was made—Both
sides claim a victory . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord198">198</ref></item>
          <item>XV  MISSIONARY RIDGE—TRIUNE DISASTER
<lb/>
Why General Bragg did not pursue Rosecrans after 
Chickamauga—Comparison of the Confederates 
at Missionary Ridge with the Greeks
at Marathon—The Battle above the Clouds—Heroic
advance by Walthall's Mississippians—General Grant's timely arrival with
reënforcements—The way opened to Atlanta . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord213">213</ref></item>
          <item>XVI  WINTER ON THE RAPIDAN
<lb/>
In camp near Clark's Mountain—Religious awakening—Revival
services throughout the camps—General Lee's interest in the 
movement—Southern women at work—Extracts from General Lee's letters to his
wife—Influence of religion on the soldiers' character . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord229">229</ref></item>
          <item>XVII THE WILDERNESS—BATTLE OF MAY 5
<lb/>
Beginning of the long fight between Grant and Lee—Grant
crosses the Rapidan—First contact of the two armies—Ewell's
<pb id="gordviii" n="viii"/>
repulse—A rapid countercharge—A strange predicament—The
Union centre broken—Unprecedented movement which saved
the Confederate troops . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord235">235</ref></item>
          <item>XVIII  THE WILDERNESS—BATTLE OF MAY 6
<lb/>
The men ordered to sleep on their arms—Report of 
scouts—Sedgwick's exposed position—A plan proposed to flank and crash
him—General Early's objections to it—Unfounded belief that Burnside
protected Sedgwick—General Lee orders a movement in the late
afternoon—Its success until interrupted by darkness—The
Government official records prove that Early was mistaken . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord243">243</ref></item>
          <item>XIX  RESULTS OF THE DRAWN BATTLES
<lb/>
General Grant the aggressor—Failure to dislodge Lee—An exciting
night ride—Surrounded by Federal troops—A narrow escape in the
darkness—General Lee's comments on the assault upon 
Sedgwick—A remarkable prediction as to General Grant's next movement . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord262">262</ref></item>
          <item>XX  SPOTTSYLVANIA
<lb/>
General Lee's prophecy fulfilled—Hancock's assault on  
May 12—One of his greatest Achievements—General Lee to the head of the
column—Turned back by his own men—Hancock repulsed—The
most remarkable battle of the war—Heroism on both sides . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord271">271</ref></item>
          <item>XXI  MOVEMENTS AFTER SPOTTSYLVANIA
<lb/>
A surprising capture—Kind treatment received by prisoners—Five
rainy days of inaction—Fighting resumed on May 18—Hancock's
corps ordered to the assault—General Grant's order to Meade:
“Where Lee goes, there you will go also”—How Lee turned the
tables—Fighting it out on this line all summer  —Lee's men still
resolute after the Wilderness . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord287">287</ref></item>
          <item>XXII  HUNTER'S RAID AND EARLY'S CHASE
<lb/>
The movement upon Lynchburg—Hunter's sudden panic—Devastation
in the Valley—Burning of private homes—Lee's orders against
destruction of private property—Washington threatened—The battle
of Monocacy—A brave charge—The defeat of General Lew
Wallace . . . . .<ref targOrder="U" target="gord300"> 300</ref></item>
          <item>XXIII  WINCHESTER AND PRECEDING EVENTS
<lb/>
The Confederate army within sight of Washington—The city could
have been taken—Reasons for the retreat—Abandonment of plan
to release Confederate prisoners—The Winchester
<pb id="gordix" n="ix"/>
Campaign—Assault on Sheridan's front—Sudden rally—Retreat of
Early's army—The battle of Fisher's Hill . . . . .<ref targOrder="U" target="gord314"> 314</ref></item>
          <item>XXIV  CEDAR CREEK—A VICTORY AND A DEFEAT
<lb/>
Sheridan's dallying for twenty-six days—Arrival of General  
Kershaw—Position of Early's army with reference to Sheridan's—The
outlook from Massanutten Mountain—Weakness of Sheridan's left
revealed—The plan of battle—A midnight march—Complete
surprise and rout of Sheridan's army—Early's decision not to follow
up the victory—Why Sheridan's ride succeeded—Victory changed into
defeat . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord327">327</ref></item>
          <item>XXV  THE FATAL HALT AT CEDAR CREEK
<lb/>
Analysis of the great mistake—Marshalling of
Testimony—Documentary proof of the error—Early's “glory enough
for one day” theory—What eye-witnesses say— The defence of the
Confederate soldier—A complete vindication . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord352">352</ref></item>
          <item>XXVI  THE LAST WINTER OF THE WAR
<lb/>
Frequent skirmishes follow Cedar Creek—Neither commander
anxious for a general engagement—Desolation in the Valley—A fated
family—Transferred to Petersburg—A gloomy Christmas—All
troops on reduced rations—Summoned to Lee's 
headquarters—Consideration of the dire straits of the army—Three possible
Courses . . . . .<ref targOrder="U" target="gord373"> 373</ref></item>
          <item>XXVII  CAPTURE OF FORT STEDMAN
<lb/>
In the trenches at Petersburg—General Lee's instructions—A daring
plan formed—Preparations for a night assault—An ingenious war
ruse—The fort captured with small loss—Failure
of reënforcements to arrive—Loss of guides—Necessary withdrawal
from the fort—The last effort to break Grant's hold  . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="gord395">395</ref></item>
          <item>XXVIII  EVACUATION OF PETERSBURG
<lb/>
Religious spirit of the soldiers in extremity—Some
amusing anecdotes—Fall of Five Forks—Death of General 
A. P. Hill—The line of defence stretched to 
breaking—General Lee's order to withdraw
from Petersburg—Continuous lighting during the retreat—Stirring
adventure of a Confederate scout—His retaliation—Lee directs the
movement toward Appomattox . . . . .  <ref targOrder="U" target="gord414">414</ref></item>
          <item>XXIX  THE SURRENDER
<lb/>
The Army of Northern Virginia reduced to a skeleton—General
Lee's calm bearing—The last Confederate council 
of war—Decision upon a final attempt to break Grant's lines—The last
charge of the war—Union breastworks carried—A fruitless
<pb id="gordx" n="x"/>
victory—Flag of truce sent to General Ord—Conference
General Sheridan—An armistice . . . . .<ref targOrder="U" target="gord429"> 429</ref></item>
          <item>XXX  THE END OF THE WAR
<lb/>
Appomattox—25,000 men surrender—Only 8000 able to bear
Arms—Uniform courtesy of the victorious Federals—A salute
for the vanquished—What Lincoln might have done—General
Sherman's liberal terms to Johnston—An estimate of General
Lee and General Grant—The war and the reunited country . . . . . 
<ref targOrder="U" target="gord443">443</ref></item>
        </list>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="list of illustrations">
        <pb id="gordxi" n="xi"/>
        <head>LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS</head>
        <list type="simple">
          <item>GENERAL JOHN B. GORDON . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="frontis"><hi rend="italics">Frontispiece</hi></ref><lb/>
From a photograph taken at the close of the war, when he was
thirty-three years of age.</item>
          <item>SUTHERLAND HOUSE, GENERAL GORDON'S HOME AT KIRKWOOD,
NEAR ATLANTA . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill2">xxi</ref></item>
          <item>A MOUNTAINEER . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill3">6</ref></item>
          <item>THE ARRIVAL OF THE RACCOON ROUGHS IN ATLANTA,
GEORGIA . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill4">10</ref></item>
          <item>WAR-TIME CAMP IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA, IN THE OLD
CITY PARK . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill5">22</ref></item>
          <item>JOHN B. GORDON . . . . .<ref targOrder="U" target="ill6"> 32</ref><lb/>Drawn by George T. Tobin from a daguerreotype taken at the
age of twenty-two.</item>
          <item>RUINS OF STONE BRIDGE, BULL RUN . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill7">44</ref></item>
          <item>THE BATTLE-FIELD OF SEVEN PINES . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill8">68</ref></item>
          <item>BURNSIDE BRIDGE AS IT APPEARS TO-DAY . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill9">80</ref></item>
          <item>PART OF THE ANTIETAM BATTLE-FIELD TO-DAY . . . . .<ref targOrder="U" target="ill9"> 80</ref></item>
          <item>GENERAL LEE AND DIVISION-COMMANDER GENERAL D. H. HILL . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill10">88</ref></item>
          <item>AN INFANTRY CAMP NEAR FALMOUTH, MARCH, 1862 . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill11">96</ref></item>
          <item>THE WILDERNESS NEAR CHANCELLORSVILLE . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill12">102</ref></item>
          <item>A CAMP ON THE PAMUNKEY RIVER, VIRGINIA . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill13">120</ref></item>
          <pb id="gordxii" n="xii"/>
          <item>MAJOR-GENERAL W. S. HANCOCK, U. S. A., DIVISION-COMMANDER,
GENERAL FRANCIS C. BARLOW, GENERAL DAVID B. 
BINNEY, AND GENERAL JOHN GIBBON . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill14">152</ref></item>
          <item>HIGH TIDE AT GETTYSBURG . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill15">156</ref></item>
          <item>INTRENCHMENTS ON LITTLE ROUND TOP, GETTYSBURG . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill16">168</ref></item>
          <item>SLAUGHTER-PEN, FOOT OF LITTLE ROUND TOP, GETTYSBURG . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill16">168</ref><lb/>From a war-time photograph.</item>
          <item>THE CHARGE UP LITTLE ROUND TOP, GETTYSBURG . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill17">172</ref><lb/>From a painting by A. C. Redwood, who was in the battle.</item>
          <item>LOOKOUT MOUNTAIN . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill18">220</ref><lb/>From a photograph taken during the war.</item>
          <item>THE WILDERNESS CAMPAIGN . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill21">242</ref></item>
          <item>A TYPICAL INCIDENT OF THE WAR—LEAVING HOME . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill23">260</ref></item>
          <item>LIEUTENANT-GENERAL THOMAS JONATHAN (“STONEWALL”) JACKSON, C.
S. A. . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill24">292</ref><lb/>From a photograph taken in Winchester, Virginia, in 1862.</item>
          <item>SENATOR JOHN B. GORDON . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill25">320</ref>
<lb/>From a photograph taken in 1896 when he represented Georgia
in the United States Senate.</item>
          <item>BATTLE-FIELD OF CEDAR CREEK, VIRGINIA . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill26">332</ref><lb/>Looking southeast toward Three Top Mountain. The turnpike
passes by the house on the right.</item>
          <item>LIEUTENANT-GENERAL RICHARD S. EWELL, C. S, A.,
GENERAL JAMES LONGSTREET, C. S. A., GENERAL
ROBERT E. LEE, C. S. A., LIEUTENANT-GENERAL JUBAL
A. EARLY, C. S. A., GENERAL GEORGE I. PICKETT,
C. S. A., GENERAL E. P. ALEXANDER, C. S. A., Chief of
Artillery in Longstreet's Corps at the Battle of Gettysburg . . . . .<ref targOrder="U" target="ill27"> 386</ref></item>
          <item>A GROUP OF SURVIVORS OF THE ORIGINAL RACCOON
ROUGHS AT A REUNION IN 1889 . . . . . <ref targOrder="U" target="ill28">450</ref></item>
        </list>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="introduction">
        <pb id="gordxiii" n="xiii"/>
        <head>INTRODUCTION TO THE MEMORIAL <lb/> EDITION</head>
        <p>GENERAL JOHN B. GORDON'S last work was the
publishing of his “Reminiscences of the Civil
War.” This volume, written in his vigorous style
and broad, patriotic spirit, has been most favorably
received and read all over the country. Since his
death this memorial edition is brought out; and it
is appropriate that an additional introduction should
accompany it, somewhat in the shape of a biographical sketch.</p>
        <p>General John Brown Gordon was an all-round
great man—a valiant and distinguished soldier, an
eminent statesman, a great orator, an author of
merit, and a public-spirited and useful citizen. He
was born in Upson County, Georgia, February 6,
1832. His father was the Rev. Zachary Herndon
Gordon. The family was of Scotch extraction,
and its members fought in the Revolutionary War.
He received his education at the university of his
native State, and by profession was a lawyer.</p>
        <p>At the breaking out of the war, in 1861, he enlisted
as a private soldier, and was elected captain
of his company. His career was perhaps as brilliant
as that of any officer in the Confederate army. In
rapid succession he filled every grade—that of
<pb id="gordxiv" n="xiv"/>
Major, Lieutenant-Colonel, Colonel, Brigadier-General, Major-General,
and, near the end, was assigned
to duty as Lieutenant-General (by authority of the
Secretary of War), and while he never received the
commission in regular form, he commanded, at
the surrender at Appomattox, one half of the Army
of Northern Virginia, under Robert E. Lee.</p>
        <p>At the close of the war he had earned the reputation
of being perhaps the most conspicuous and
personally valiant officer surviving, and the one
generally regarded as most promising and competent
for increased rank and larger command. His imposing and
magnificent soldierly bearing, coupled
with his splendid ringing voice and far-reaching
oratory, made him the “White-plumed Knight of
our Southland” and the “Chevalier Bayard of the
Confederate Army.” He had the God-given talent
of getting in front of his troops and, in a few magnetic
appeals, inspiring them almost to madness,
and being able to lead them into the jaws of death.
This was notably done at Fredericksburg, and again
on the 12th of May, at the battle of Spottsylvania 
Court House. He greatly distinguished himself on
many bloody fields. I mention now, as most prominent,
the battles of Seven Pines, Sharpsburg or
Antietam, the Wilderness, Spottsylvania Court
House, Cedar Creek, Petersburg, and Appomattox.
At Sharpsburg he was wounded five times, but
would not leave his troops till the last shot laid him
helpless and insensible on the field. A scholarly
professor of history in one of our Southern universities
recently stated that in his study of the great
war on both sides he had found but one prominent
<pb id="gordxv" n="xv"/>
general who, when he was in command, or when he led
a charge, had never been defeated or repulsed, and
that general was John B. Gordon. At Appomattox,
just before the surrender, when Lee's army had
“been fought to a frazzle” and was surrounded by
the enemy, General Gordon, under the most discouraging
conditions, led the last charge of the
Army of Northern Virginia, and captured the intrenchments
and several pieces of artillery in his
front just before the surrender.</p>
        <p>He returned to his native State immediately after
the surrender at Appomattox, and discovered that
his war record had made him the most popular man
before the people of his State. His soldiers idolized
him, and his fame was a pleasant theme in almost
every household. Almost under protest, he was
elected governor in 1867, but reconstruction tactics
counted him out. He was elected United States
senator in 1872, when only forty years of age, over
two of the greatest statesmen Georgia ever had,
Alexander H. Stephens and Benjamin H. Hill. He
served, first and last, about thirteen years in the
Senate of the United States. His services in the
national Congress were brilliant and statesmanlike,
and placed the entire South under great obligations
for his display of tact, fortitude, wisdom, and patience
under great provocation at possibly the most
delicate and threatening period in the history of the
ex-Confederate States. His courage and eloquence,
used always conservatively, with the aid of such
men as Lamar of Mississippi, Hill of Georgia, Gibson of Louisiana,
and others, brought his own State
and Louisiana, South Carolina, Mississippi, and the
<pb id="gordxvi" n="xvi"/>
entire Southland under the control of their own
people. He was chosen by the Democrats in Congress
to draft an address to the people of the South,
urging patience, endurance, and an appeal to a returning
sense of justice as the cure for all wrongs.
He was elected governor of Georgia twice, and the
record shows that his messages were as able as any
emanating from the long line of distinguished men
who preceded or followed him. Able critics declared
his first Inaugural “worthy of Thomas Jefferson.”</p>
        <p>Of his last election as United States senator, a
contemporary historian has written:</p>
        <q direct="unspecified">
          <p>It was a marvellous political victory. Unopposed until
he antagonized the sub-treasury plan of the Farmers'
Alliance, which had four fifths of the Legislature in its
favor, he was elected after the most exciting contest of
the times. In the wild enthusiasm succeeding his victory,
he was borne by the multitude through the Capitol
to the street, placed on a caisson, and drawn about the
city amid shouts and rejoicing, while the whole State
was ablaze with bonfires. His speech in the Senate in
1893, at the time of the Chicago riots, pledging the aid
of the South in maintaining law and order, rang from
one end of the country to the other.</p>
        </q>
        <p>Declining a reëlection to the Senate in 1897, he
devoted his latter years to the lecture platform.
The one object nearest his heart was to wipe out
as far as possible all bitterness between the people
of the North and the South. His great lecture,
“The Last Days of the Confederacy,” was received
with enthusiasm everywhere, and he really became
<pb id="gordxvii" n="xvii"/>
the great evangel of peace and good feeling; nor was
his a new idea with him. At Appomattox, after
the surrender of Lee's army, he gathered his weeping
heroes around him, and his patriotism in that
dark hour was prophetic and grand. He told his
comrades “to bear their trial bravely, to go home
in peace, obey the laws, rebuild the country, and
work for the weal and harmony of the Republic.”
This text was his theme ever afterwards, and while
stalwart in battling inch by inch in Congress for
his beloved Southland, and devoted to the tender
memories of the Confederacy, he yet set an example
of true patriotism, by adding to this devotion an
unwavering loyalty to our great reunited American
Republic. No one could move the masses as he did,
North and South, by appeals to patriotism, coupled
with pride of section and country.</p>
        <p>The affectionate regard in which he was held
was nowhere brought out so markedly as in the
great fraternal gatherings of ex-Confederate Soldiers.
Here he appeared greatest and most beloved.
He was their only Commander from the organization of the
United Confederate Veterans until his
death. His magical leadership and personality and
wise and conservative administration gave it shape
and success. His hold on and influence over his
comrades, when he appeared among them or rose
to speak, was wonderful to behold. Even a motion
of his hand brought silence, and the great gatherings
hung on every word he spoke, and his advice decided everything.
At the Reunion at Nashville,
Tennessee, he attempted to lay down his commission
as Commander. No one who witnessed that scene
<pb id="gordxviii" n="xviii"/>
will ever forget it. The great assemblage (some six
thousand persons) rose spontaneously, and with wild
acclamation, that would admit of no parleying or
delay, commissioned him for life as leader and Commander.
I doubt if any other man ever had a greater and more
effective demonstration of love and confidence. A similar
scene occurred at Louisville. Here he raised his voice, amid great
excitement, in favor of conservative bearing toward the
Veterans of the North, who, when they had their meeting in
Fredericksburg,
Virginia, had sent friendly greetings to the Veterans of the South.</p>
        <p>In his private life he was pure and spotless, and
an example to every American citizen. His devotion
to his wife and family was beautiful in the extreme.
In early life he had married Miss Fanny Haralson,
daughter of Hon. Hugh Anderson Haralson,
who represented Georgia in Congress for many 
years, and her devotion to him equalled the great 
love he bore her. She was ever near him through-out
the war, and, but for her tender and wifely
nursing when supposed to be fatally wounded at
Sharpsburg, he could never have recovered. Her
war experience would make a beautiful romance to
go down with that of her departed husband. He
never failed to try and make her the partner of his
triumphs and popularity. At many of the reunions
the old veterans accorded her as great an ovation as
they gave their Commander.</p>
        <p>No event since the great demonstration in New Orleans when
Jefferson Davis died has brought out more strikingly the
love of the Southern people
for any one man than was shown when General
<pb id="gordxix" n="xix"/>
Gordon was laid away in the beautiful cemetery in
Atlanta, Georgia (January 14, 1904). Upwards of
seventy-five thousand people viewed and took part in 
the ceremonies. Governors and distinguished
citizens from almost every Southern State were
present; and it was especially touching to witness
the exhibition of love and affection of surviving
Confederate soldiers, who attended in great numbers
to show their esteem for the beloved dead. The
people of the North also expressed sympathy, and
the universal grief was reflected in telegrams from
the President of the United States, the Secretary
of War, the General of the army, in resolutions of
State Legislatures in session, and in memorial meetings
in many localities.</p>
        <p>He was a devout and humble Christian gentleman.
I know of no man more beloved at the South,
and he was probably the most popular Southern
man among the people of the North.</p>
        <closer>
          <signed>STEPHEN D. LEE,<lb/>
<hi rend="italics">Commander-in-Chief</hi> United Confederate Veterans.</signed>
        </closer>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="figure">
        <p>
          <figure id="ill2" entity="gordxxi">
            <p>SUTHERLAND HOUSE, GENERAL GORDON'S HOME AT KIRKWOOD, NEAR ATLANTA</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="memorial">
        <pb id="gordxxi" n="xxi"/>
        <head>MEMORIAL SKETCH OF THE LAST HOURS,<lb/> 
DEATH, AND FUNERAL OF GENERAL<lb/> 
JOHN B. GORDON</head>
        <p>ON Wednesday morning, January 6, 1904, General
Gordon was stricken with his last illness.
Less than three weeks before, he had come to his
winter home on Biscayne Bay, in Florida, where
the sunlight and balmy air, always a delight to
him, had seemed to revive him and stir his enthusiasm
to a degree unusual even in one of his energetic and
joyous temperament.</p>
        <p>Those great qualities which set him high among
men illumined with peculiar lustre these last
weeks, making them an epitome of his whole life.
Unconquerable energy, undying enthusiasm—above
all, unselfish love—these were the traits which
had borne him through the battles of war and the
battles of peace, and through years of peerless civic
service; these the traits which uplifted the work of
his stalwart years and bore his spirit indomitable
through years of physical frailty, and which at the
very last shone through the mists of his dying
hours with the glowing beauty of a setting sun.
Only the day before his illness, he was tramping
over the fields and through the orchards with his
grandson, planning with the delight of a boy.
<pb id="gordxxii" n="xxii"/>
“My son, this shall be a paradise for your grandmother and all
of us some day.”</p>
        <p>Before noon on Wednesday he was unconscious,
and it seemed he would sink out of sight without
a sign; but in forty-eight hours he rallied. On
Saturday morning he looked out on the sunlit bay
and at the great palms waving against a blue sky,
and said in low and broken tones: “It seems a poor
use of God's beautiful gifts to us to be ill on a day
like this!” From then until the end he was conscious
enough to be constantly solicitous of the
comfort of those about him, and to give during
every fleeting hour some tender thought to that one
who had been the comrade of his soul for nearly
fifty years—“his helpmeet in the loftiest sense,
his comforter, his counsellor, his friend”;<ref targOrder="U" id="ref1" rend="sc" target="note1">1</ref> and as
his beautiful spirit was poised for its glorious flight,
he gave to her the last look and smile and touch of
recognition.</p>
        <p>At five minutes past ten o'clock on Saturday
night, January 9, he passed into another life, as
peacefully as a little child falls asleep. Within an
hour the message had sped over the wires to the
whole country; and the crowds around the bulletin
boards in many Southern cities turned silently, and
with tear-dimmed eyes scattered to their homes.
Before midnight newsboys were crying the sad news
up and down the residence streets; and on Sunday
morning the heart of the whole South seemed to
go out in one great throb of pain and sympathy.
From every quarter of the country, as fast as the
wires could carry them, came messages of sympathy
<note id="note1" n="1" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref1"><p>1  From the
Atlanta “News” of January 14, 1904.</p></note>
<pb id="gordxxiii" n="xxiii"/>
from those who loved the man, and from those
who mourned the nation's loss.</p>
        <p>On Sunday evening, at the request of the people
of Miami, Florida, the body was borne, with military
escort, to the Presbyterian church in that
little city on the bay, to lie there in state until the
funeral train should leave for Atlanta. A detachment of
Florida troops accompanied the remains
to Atlanta, and at the State line this guard of honor
was augmented by members of the staff of Georgia's
governor. At every station beautiful flowers were
brought to the funeral car, and, when time allowed,
old Confederate veterans, with tears streaming down
their rugged cheeks, filed by to look for the last
time on the face of their beloved leader.</p>
        <q direct="unspecified">
          <p>“Hats off! Gordon comes home to-day.” <ref targOrder="U" id="ref2" rend="sc" target="note2">1</ref></p>
        </q>
        <q direct="unspecified">
          <p>“He comes—not as he came, one sunny day in spring
nearly twoscore years ago, wearing the crested cypress
of defeat as gravely proud as some successful Caesar
might wear the conqueror's coronal of bays; not as he
came when he laid aside the cares of statesmanship, and
loftily enshrined in love and gratitude for those victories
of peace no less renowned than war, voluntarily retire
from the highest parliament of the world; not as he came
for so many successive years from the annual camp-fires
where the broken battalions met to exchange their stirring
stories of the valor of other days, and, above all, to
sit once more under the magic spell of his inspiring
tongue. He has come home as, in the course of nature,
he needs must come at last, covered with the sable trappings
of grief, heralded by the slow monody of muffled
drums, followed by the measured march of a people dissolved
in the unspeakable bitterness of tears.” <ref targOrder="U" id="ref3" rend="sc" target="note3">2</ref></p>
        </q>
        <note id="note2" n="2" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref2">
          <p>1 From Atlanta “Constitution” of January 13, 1904.</p>
        </note>
        <note id="note3" n="3" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref3">
          <p>2 Editorial in Atlanta “News” of January 13, 1904.</p>
        </note>
        <pb id="gordxxiv" n="xxiv"/>
        <p>In the cold gray dawn of the January morning a
great throng overflowed the station, and filled the
streets outside, as the train rolled into Atlanta, bearing
the body of General Gordon. The official escort
awaiting the train was composed of the new
commander-in-chief of the Confederate Veterans Association,
and other ex-Confederate officers, members
and commanders of four camps of Confederate 
Veterans, the Confederate Veterans on the Atlanta 
police force, mounted police, and State militia.
Besides these, thousands stood with heads bared, and
bowed in reverence, as the casket was removed and
borne to the hearse by the grizzled heroes who had
followed this leader in war, and learned of him the
lessons of peace. As the pall-bearers moved toward
the hearse, an old veteran approached the casket,
hurriedly, removed his overcoat, handed it to a <sic>by-stander</sic>,
and jerking off his worn and faded jacket,
of Confederate gray, asked, in tremulous tones,
“May I lay it on his coffin just one minute?” His
request was granted; and, as he lifted the jacket
tenderly and slipped it again over his bent shoulders,
he said between sobs: “Now thousands could n't buy it from me!”</p>
        <p>The procession moved to the State Capitol, and
there in the rotunda, on a catafalque covered with
flowers, the casket was placed. Around the great
circular room, at intervals, drooped the flag of his
beloved Confederacy, for which he had given the
first blood of his young manhood, and the flag of a
reunited country, to which he had given the richest
offerings of his mature years. Palm branches from
Florida, floral tributes from all over the South and
<pb id="gordxxv" n="xxv"/>
from the North, garlanded four tall pillars, and hung
in fragrant masses on the casket, on the walls, and on
stands about the corridor. And thus “the first citizen
of the South lay in state in Georgia's Capitol.”<ref targOrder="U" id="ref4" rend="sc" target="note4">1</ref>
Tens of thousands passed in double line to look
upon the face of a man “who was loved as seldom
man was ever loved on earth.”<ref targOrder="U" id="ref5" rend="sc" target="note5">2</ref> The Capitol doors
were kept open at night that the workingmen might
see his face, and it was long after midnight before
the special guard of veterans and militia was left
alone with its precious charge.</p>
        <p>On Thursday morning, at ten o'clock, memorial
exercises were held in the Georgia Hall of Representatives.
While addresses were being made by
men of distinction who had served with him in war
and in peace, men, women, and children still passed,
in unbroken line, by the casket in the rotunda.
Immediately following these exercises, religious
services were held in the Presbyterian church adjoining
the Capitol. A way was opened through
the throng, which packed the Capitol corridors and
massed in the square and streets outside; and the
casket was borne across by his old comrades. At
Mrs. Gordon's request the veterans were given first
place in the church after the family.</p>
        <q direct="unspecified">
          <p>“The thing that made Gordon great—that which
bound him close to men and made him dear to them— 
was his mighty heart, strong as the ramparts of the hills
through which he led his columns, gentle and pure as the
kind zephyrs of his own Southland . . . . Honest search
after the source of Gordon's superb power cannot fail to
show that the fountain of his strength was not merely in
<note id="note4" n="4" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref4"><p>1 Atlanta 
“News,” January 13, 1904.</p></note>
<note id="note5" n="5" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref5"><p>2 Atlanta 
“Journal”</p></note>
<pb id="gordxxvi" n="xxvi"/>
his right arm, nor in his keen and flashing blade, nor yet
in his alertness of mind and vigor of intellect, but in the
meeting of these qualities with a pure spirit—these
sterling virtues fused behind the crystal of his soul,
forming the true mirror of knighthood . . . . He was
master of many because master of 
himself.”<ref targOrder="U" id="ref6" rend="sc" target="note6">1</ref></p>
        </q>
        <p>From the rich treasury of such a nature the
ministers of Christ drew their lessons over the
bier of this “prince of Christian 
chivalry.”<ref targOrder="U" id="ref7" rend="sc" target="note7">2</ref></p>
        <p>During the hours of the funeral, public and private
schools and places of business were closed.
All flags hung at half-mast, and in some cities
remained so for thirty days. Seventeen guns were
fired at intervals of half an hour during the day.
Throughout Georgia and the entire South, memorial services
were held at this hour, and from
morning till night bells tolled out the grief of the
people.</p>
        <p>The staff of the Department of the Gulf, United
States Army, the Atlanta Camp, G. A. R., the Sixth
Regiment United States infantry, stationed near
Atlanta, asked for place in the line of the funeral
procession. They wished to join with others of the
North in paying tribute to the man “who had done
most to make them forget the animosities of war— 
and whose course since that time had marked
him with the attributes of true 
greatness.”<ref targOrder="U" id="ref8" rend="sc" target="note8">3</ref></p>
        <p>It was a “sweet and solemn pageant,” that
funeral procession, which moved to muffled drumbeats
through the city streets, all filled with a silent
throng and hushed in reverent sorrow: veterans
<note id="note6" n="6" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref6"><p>1 
Editorial Atlanta “Journal,” January 14, 1904.</p></note>
<note id="note7" n="7" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref7"><p>2 
Atlanta “News.”</p></note>
<note id="note8" n="8" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref8"><p>3 
“Free Press,” Detroit, Michigan, and other Northern papers.</p></note>
<pb id="gordxxvii" n="xxvii"/>
of the Blue and of the Gray; men of America's army
to-day, regulars and militia; corps of cadets from
Southern military schools; patriotic organizations;
drum corps and bugle corps; and a host of private
citizens: and when the hearse stopped at the lot
selected by the Ladies' Confederate Memorial Association,
the end of the procession was still down in
the city streets.</p>
        <p>And now</p>
        <q direct="unspecified">
          <p>“The mortal remains of General John B. 
Gordon—soldier and statesman—lie in Oakland Cemetery . . . .
The muffled drum has beat the funeral march, and grief
has found voice in the piercing minor of the fifes. But
from over the whole South to-day there rises a strange
music which blends in one large requiem—not the dirge
of unavailing sorrow, but rather a paean of heroic triumph
reciting the valorous deeds of him whom the people
mourn.” <ref targOrder="U" id="ref9" rend="sc" target="note9">1</ref></p>
          <note id="note9" n="9" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref9">
            <p>1 Atlanta “Journal,” January 14, 1904.</p>
          </note>
        </q>
        <p>And those who knew him and loved him best,
whose lives are most enriched by the matchless
loveliness of his life, are lifted up in his death, and,
in the midst of their grief, open their hearts to the
countless thousands who mourn his loss, because
“he had kept the whiteness of his soul.” “His
name becomes the heritage of his people, and his
fame the glory of a nation.”<ref targOrder="U" id="ref10" rend="sc" target="note10">2</ref></p>
        <p>FRANCES GORDON SMITH.</p>
        <note id="note10" n="10" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref10">
          <p>2 
Atlanta “Constitution,” January 14, 1904.</p>
        </note>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="introduction">
        <pb id="gordxxix" n="xxix"/>
        <head>INTRODUCTION</head>
        <p>FOR many years I have been urged to place on
record my reminiscences of the war between the
States. In undertaking the task now, it is not my
purpose to attempt a comprehensive description of
that great struggle, nor an elaborate analysis of
the momentous interests and issues involved. The
time may not have arrived for a full and fair history
of that most interesting period in the Republic's
life. The man capable of writing it with
entire justice to both sides is perhaps yet unborn.
He may appear, however, at a future day, fully
equipped for the great work. If endowed with the
requisite breadth and clearness of view, with
inflexible mental integrity and absolute freedom from
all bias, he will produce the most instructive and
thrilling record in the world's deathless annals, and
cannot fail to make a contribution of measureless
value to the American people and to the cause of
free government throughout the world.</p>
        <p>Conscious of my own inability to meet the demands
of so great an undertaking, I have not attempted it,
but with an earnest desire to contribute
<pb id="gordxxx" n="xxx"/>
something toward such future history these reminiscences
have been written. I have endeavored
to make my review of that most heroic era so condensed
as to claim the attention of busy people,
and so impartial as to command the confidence of
the fair-minded in all sections. It has been my
fixed purpose to make a brief but dispassionate
and judicially fair analysis of the divergent opinions
and ceaseless controversies which for half a
century produced an ever-widening alienation between
the sections, and which finally plunged into
the fiercest and bloodiest of fratricidal wars a
great and enlightened people who were of the same
race, supporters of the same Constitution, and joint
heirs of the same freedom. I have endeavored to
demonstrate that the courage displayed and the
ratio of losses sustained were unprecedented in
modern warfare. I have also recorded in this volume
a large number of those characteristic and
thrilling incidents which illustrate a unique and
hitherto unwritten phase of the war, the story of
which should not be lost, because it is luminous
with the noblest lessons. Many of these incidents
came under my own observation. They marked
every step of the war's progress, were often witnessed
by both armies, and were of almost daily
occurrence in the camps, on the marches, and
between the lines; increasing in frequency and
pathos as the war progressed, and illustrating the
<pb id="gordxxxi" n="xxxi"/>
distinguishing magnanimity and lofty manhood of
the American soldier.</p>
        <p>It will be found, I trust, that no injustice has
been done to either section, to any army, or to any
of the great leaders, but that the substance and
spirit of the following pages will tend rather to lift
to a higher plane the estimate placed by victors
and vanquished upon their countrymen of the opposing
section, and thus strengthen the sentiment
of intersectional fraternity which is essential to
complete national unity.</p>
        <closer>
          <signed>J. B. GORDON.</signed>
        </closer>
      </div1>
    </front>
    <body>
      <div1 type="text">
        <pb id="gord1" n="1"/>
        <head>REMINISCENCES OF THE <lb/>
CIVIL WAR</head>
        <div2 type="chapter">
          <pb id="gord3" n="3"/>
          <head>CHAPTER I</head>
          <head>MY FIRST COMMAND AND THE OUTBREAK OF THE WAR</head>
          <argument>
            <p>A company of mountaineers—Joe Brown's 
pikes—The Raccoon Roughs—The
first Rebel yell—A flag presented to the company—Arrival at
Montgomery, Alabama—Analysis of the causes of the war—Slavery's part
in it—Liberty in the Union of the States, and liberty in the
independence of
the States.</p>
          </argument>
          <p>THE outbreak of war found me in the mountains of Georgia,
Tennessee, and Alabama, engaged in the development of coal-mines.
This does not mean that I
was a citizen of three States; but it does mean that I
lived so near the lines that my mines were in Georgia, my house
in Alabama, and my post-office in Tennessee.
The first company of soldiers, therefore, with which I entered
the service was composed of stalwart mountaineers from the three States. I
had
been educated for the bar
and for a time practised law in Atlanta. In September, 1854,
I had married Miss Fanny Haralson,
third daughter of General Hugh A. Haralson, of La Grange,
Georgia. The wedding occurred on her seventeenth birthday and when I was but
twenty-two. We had two
children, both boys. The struggle between devotion to
my family on the one hand and duty to my
country on the other was most trying to my sensibilities. My
spirit had been caught up by the flaming enthusiasm that swept
like a prairie-fire through the land, and I
hastened to unite with the brave men of the mountains
in organizing a company of volunteers. But what
<pb id="gord4" n="4"/>
was I to do with the girl-wife and the two little boys? The
wife and mother was no less taxed in her effort to settle
this momentous question. But finally yielding to the
promptings of her own heart and to her unerring sense of
duty, she ended doubt as to what disposition was to be
made of her by announcing that she intended to
accompany me to the war, leaving her children with my
mother and faithful “Mammy Mary.” I rejoiced at her
decision then, and had still greater reasons for rejoicing
at it afterward, when I felt through every fiery ordeal the
inspiration of her near presence, and had, at need, the
infinite comfort of her tender nursing.</p>
          <p>The mountaineers did me the honor to elect me their
captain. It was the first office I had ever held, and I verily
believed it would be the last; for I expected to fight with
these men till the war ended or until I should be killed.
Our first decision was to mount and go as cavalry. We had
not then learned, as we did later, the full meaning of that
war-song, “If you want to have a good time, jine the
cavalry”; but like most Southerners we were inured to
horseback, and all preferred that great arm of the service.</p>
          <p>This company of mounted men was organized as soon as
a conflict seemed probable and prior to any call for
volunteers. They were doomed to a disappointment, “No
cavalry now needed” was the laconic and stunning reply to
the offer of our services. What was to be done, was the
perplexing question. The proposition to wait until
mounted men were needed was promptly negatived by
the suggestion that we were so far from any point where a
battle was likely to occur, and so hidden from view by the
surrounding mountains, that we might be forgotten and the
war might end before we had a chance.</p>
          <p>“Let us dismount and go at once as infantry.” This
proposition was carried with a shout and by an almost
unanimous vote. My own vote and whatever influence
<pb id="gord5" n="5"/>
I possessed were given in favor of the suggestion,
although my desire for cavalry service had grown to a
passion. Accustomed to horseback on my father's
plantation from my early childhood, and with an untutored
imagination picturing the wild sweep of my chargers upon
belching batteries and broken lines of infantry, it was to
me, as well as to my men, a sad descent from dashing
cavalry to a commonplace company of slow, plodding
foot-soldiers. Reluctantly, therefore, we abandoned our horses,
and in order certainly to reach the point of action before
the war was over, we resolved to go at once to the front
as infantry, without waiting for orders, arms, or uniforms.
Not a man in the company had the slightest military training,
and the captain himself knew very little of military tactics.</p>
          <p>The new government that was to be formed had no
standing army as a nucleus around which the volunteers
could be brought into compact order, with a centre of
disciplined and thoroughly drilled soldiery; and the States
which were to form it had but few arms, and no artisans or
factories to supply them. The old-fashioned squirrel rifles
and double-barrelled shot-guns were called into requisition.
Governor Joseph E. Brown, of Georgia, put shops in the
State to work, making what were called “Joe Brown's
pikes.” They were a sort of rude bayonet, or steel lance,
fastened, not to guns, but to long poles or handles, and
were to be given to men who had no other arms. Of
course, few if any of these pikemen ever had occasion to
use these warlike implements, which were worthy of the
Middle Ages, but those who bore them were as gallant
knights as ever levelled a lance in close quarters. I may
say that very few bayonets of any kind were actually used
in battle, so far as my observation extended. The one line
or the other usually gave way under the galling fire of
small arms, grape, and canister, before the bayonet could
be brought into
<pb id="gord6" n="6"/>
requisition. The bristling points and the glitter of the bayonets
were fearful to look upon as they were levelled in front of a
charging line; but they were rarely reddened with blood. The
day of the bayonet is passed except for use in hollow squares, or
in resisting cavalry charges, or as an implement in constructing
light and temporary fortifications. It may still serve a purpose in
such emergencies or to impress the soldier's imagination, as the
loud-sounding and ludicrous gongs are supposed to stiffen the
backs and steady the nerves of the grotesque soldiers of China.
Of course, Georgia's able war governor did not contemplate any
very serious execution with these pikes; but the volunteers came
in such numbers and were so eager for the fray that something
had to be done; and this device served its purpose. It at least
shows the desperate straits in securing arms to which the South
was driven, even after seizing the United States arsenals within
the Confederate territory.</p>
          <p>The irrepressible humor and ready rustic wit which afterward
relieved the tedium of the march and broke the monotony of the
camp, and which, like a star in the darkness, seemed to grow
more brilliant as the gloom of war grew denser, had already
begun to sparkle in the intercourse of the volunteers. A
woodsman who was noted as a “crack shot” among his hunting
companions felt sure that he was going, to win fame as a select
rifleman in the army; for he said that in killing a squirrel he
always put the bullet through the head, though the squirrel might
be perched at the time on the topmost limb of the tallest tree. An
Irishman who had seen service in the Mexican War, and was
attentively listening to this young hunter's boast, fixed his
twinkling eye upon the aspiring rifleman and said to him: “Yes;
but Dan, me boy, ye must ricollict that the squirrel had no gon in
his hand to shoot back at ye.” The young huntsman had not
thought about that; but he doubtless found
<figure id="ill3" entity="gord6"><p>A MOUNTAINEER<lb/>The coon-skin cap was drawn from one made by a survivor of the Raccoon Roughs. Several styles were worn by the company.</p></figure>
<pb id="gord7" n="7"/>
later on, as the marksmen of both armies did, that it made
a vast difference in the accuracy of aim when those in front
not only had “gons” in their hands, but were firing them
with distracting rapidity. This rude Irish philosopher had
explained in a sentence one cause of the wild and aimless
firing which wasted more tons of lead in a battle than all
its dead victims would weigh.</p>
          <p>There was at the outbreak of the war and just preceding
it a class of men both North and South over whose
inconsistencies the thoughtful, self-poised, and
determined men who did the fighting made many jokes,
as the situation grew more serious. It was that class of
men in both sections who were most resolute in words
and most prudent in acts; who urged the sections to the
conflict and then did little to help them out of it; who, like
the impatient war-horse, snuffed the battle from afar—very
far: but who, when real war began to roll its crimson tide
nearer and nearer to them, came to the conclusion that it
was better for the country, as well as for themselves, to
labor in other spheres; and that it was their duty, as
America's great humorist put it, to sacrifice not
themselves but their wives' relations on patriotism's altar.
One of these furious leaders at the South declared that if
we would secede from the Union there would be no war,
and if there should be a war, we could “whip the Yankees
with children's pop-guns.” When, after the war, this same
gentleman was addressing an audience, he was asked by
an old maimed soldier: “Say, Judge, ain't you the same man that told us
before the war that we could whip the Yankees with pop-guns?”</p>
          <p>“Yes,” replied the witty speaker, “and we could, but,
confound 'em they wouldn't fight us that way.”</p>
          <p>My company, dismounted and ready for infantry
service, did not wait for orders to move, but hastily
bidding adieu to home and kindred, were off for Milledgeville,
<pb id="gord8" n="8"/>
then capital of Georgia. At Atlanta a telegram from the
governor met us, telling us to go back home, and stay there until
our services were needed. Our discomfiture can be better
imagined than described. In fact, there broke out at once in my
ranks a new rebellion. These rugged mountaineers resolved that
they would not go home; that they had a right to go to the war,
had started to the war, and were not going to be trifled with by
the governor or any one else. Finally, after much persuasion, and
by the cautious exercise of the authority vested in me by my
office of captain, I prevailed on them to get on board the home-bound
train. As the engine-bell rang and the whistle blew for the
train to start, the rebellion broke loose again with double fury.
The men rushed to the front of the train, uncoupled the cars
from the engine, and gravely informed me that they had
reconsidered and were not going back; that they intended to go
to the war, and that if Governor Brown would not accept them,
some other governor would. Prophetic of future dash as this wild
impetuosity might be, it did not give much promise of soldierly
discipline; but I knew my men and did not despair. I was
satisfied that the metal in them was the best of steel and only
needed careful tempering.</p>
          <p>They disembarked and left the empty cars on the track, with
the trainmen looking on in utter amazement. There was no
course left me but to march them through the streets of Atlanta
to a camp on the outskirts. The march, or rather straggle, through that city was
a sight marvellous to behold and never to be forgotten. Totally
undisciplined and undrilled, no two of these men marched
abreast; no two kept the same step; no two wore the same
colored coats or trousers. The only pretence at uniformity was
the rough fur caps made of raccoon skins, with long, bushy,
streaked raccoon tails hanging from behind them. The streets
were packed with men,
<pb id="gord9" n="9"/>
women, and children, eager to catch a glimpse of this grotesque
company. Naturally we were the observed of all observers.
Curiosity was on tip-toe, and from the crowded sidewalks there
came to me the inquiry, “Are you the captain of that company,
sir?” With a pride which I trust was pardonable, I indicated that I
was. In a moment there came to me the second inquiry, “What
company is that, sir?” Up to this time no name had been chosen— 
at least, none had been announced to the men. I had myself,
however, selected a name which I considered both poetic and
appropriate, and I replied to the question, “This company is the
Mountain Rifles.” Instantly a tall mountaineer said in a tone not
intended for his captain, but easily overheard by his companions
and the bystanders: “Mountain hell! we are no Mountain Rifles;
we are the Raccoon Roughs.” It is scarcely necessary to say
that my selected name was never heard of again. This towering
Ajax had killed it by a single blow. The name he gave us clung to
the company during all of its long and faithful service.</p>
          <p>Once in camp, we kept the wires hot with telegrams to
governors of other States, imploring them to give us a chance.
Governor Moore, of Alabama, finally responded, graciously
consenting to incorporate the captain of the “Raccoon Roughs”
and his coon-capped company into one of the regiments soon to
be organized. The reading of this telegram evoked from my men
the first wild Rebel yell it was my fortune to hear. Even then it
was weird and thrilling. Through all the stages of my subsequent
promotions, in all the battles in which I was engaged, this same
exhilarating shout from these same trumpet-like throats rang in
my ears, growing fainter and fainter as these heroic men
became fewer and fewer at the end of each bloody day's work;
and when the last hour of the war came, in the last desperate
charge at Appomattox, the few and broken remnants of
<pb id="gord10" n="10"/>
the Raccoon Roughs were still near their first captain's side,
cheering him with the dying echoes of that first yell in the
Atlanta camp.</p>
          <p>Alabama's governor had given us the coveted “chance,” and
with bounding hearts we joined the host of volunteers then
rushing to Montgomery. The line of our travel was one unbroken
scene of enthusiasm. Bonfires blazed from the hills at night, and
torch-light processions, with drums and fifes, paraded the streets
of the towns. In the absence of real cannon, blacksmiths' anvils
were made to thunder our welcome. Vast throngs gathered at
the depots, filling the air with their shoutings, and bearing banners
with all conceivable devices, proclaiming Southern independence,
and pledging the last dollar and man for the success of the
cause. Staid matrons and gayly bedecked maidens rushed upon
the cars, pinned upon our lapels the blue cockades, and cheered
us by chanting in thrilling chorus:</p>
          <lg type="verse">
            <l>In Dixie-land I take my stand</l>
            <l>To live and die in Dixie.</l>
          </lg>
          <p>At other points they sang “The Bonnie Blue Flag,” and the
Raccoon Roughs, as they were thenceforward known, joined in
the transporting chorus:</p>
          <lg type="verse">
            <l>Hurrah, hurrah, for Southern rights hurrah! </l>
            <l>Hurrah for the Bonnie Blue Flag that bears a single star!</l>
          </lg>
          <p>The Hon. R. M. T. Hunter, of Virginia, who had been
Speaker of the National House of Representatives, and United
States senator, and who afterward became the Confederate
Secretary of State and one of the Hampton Roads
commissioners to meet President Lincoln and the Federal
representatives, was travelling upon the same train that carried
my company to Montgomery. This famous and venerable
statesman, on his way to Alabama's capital to aid in organizing
the new Government, made,
<figure id="ill4" entity="gord10"><p>THE ARRIVAL OF THE RACCOON ROUGHS IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA</p></figure>
<pb id="gord11" n="11"/>
in answer to the popular demand, a number of speeches at the
different stations. His remarks on these occasions were usually
explanatory of the South's attitude in the threatened conflict.
They were concise, clear, and forcible. The people did not need
argument; but they applauded his every utterance, as he
carefully described the South's position as one not of aggression
but purely of defence; discussed the doctrine promulgated in the
Declaration of the Fathers, that all governments derive their just
powers from the consent of the governed; asserted the
sovereignty of the States, and their right to peaceably assume
that sovereignty, as evidenced by the declaration of New York,
Rhode Island, and Virginia when they entered the Union;
explained the protection given the South's peculiar property by
the plain provisions of the Constitution and the laws; urged the
necessity of separation both for Southern security and the
permanent peace of the sections; and closed with the
declaration that, while there was no trace of authority in the
Constitution for the invasion and coercion of a sovereign State,
yet it was the part of prudence and of patriotism to prepare for
defence in case of necessity.</p>
          <p>Although I was a young man, yet, as the only captain on
board, it fell to my lot also to respond to frequent calls. In the
midst of this wild excitement and boundless enthusiasm, I was
induced to make some promises which I afterward found
inconvenient and even impossible to fulfil. A flag was presented
bearing a most embarrassing motto. That motto consisted of two
words: “No Retreat.” I was compelled to accept it. There was,
indeed, no retreat for me then; and in my speech accepting the
flag I assured the fair donors that those coon-capped boys would
make that motto ring with their cracking rifles on every
battle-field; and in the ardor and inexperience of my young manhood, I
related to these ladies and to the crowds at the depot the story
of
<pb id="gord12" n="12"/>
the little drummer-boy of Switzerland who, when captured and
ordered to beat upon his drum a retreat, proudly replied,
“Switzerland knows no such music!” Gathering additional
inspiration from the shouts and applause which the story evoked,
I exclaimed, “And these brave mountaineers and the young
Confederacy, like glorious little Switzerland, will never know a
retreat!” My men applauded and sanctioned this outburst of
inconsiderate enthusiasm, but we learned better after a while. A
little sober experience vastly modified and assuaged our youthful
impetuosity. War is a wonderful developer, as well as destroyer,
of men; and our four years of tuition in it equalled in both these
particulars at least forty years of ordinary schooling. The first
battle carried us through the rudimentary course of a military
education; and several months before the four years' course was
ended, the thoughtful ones began to realize that though the
expense account had been great, it had at least reasonably well
prepared us for final graduation, and for receiving the brief little
diploma handed to us at Appomattox.</p>
          <p>If any apology be needed for my pledge to the patriotic women
who presented the little flag with the big motto, “No Retreat,” it
must be found in the depth of the conviction that our cause was
just. From great leaders and constitutional expounders, from
schools and colleges, from debates in Congress, in the convention
that adopted the Constitution, and from discussions on the
hustings, we had learned the lesson of the sovereignty of the
States. We had imbibed these political principles from our
childhood. We were, therefore, prepared to defend them, ready
to die for them, and it was impossible at the beginning for us to
believe that they would be seriously and forcibly assailed.</p>
          <p>But I must return to our trip to Montgomery. We reached that
city at night to find it in a hubbub over
<pb id="gord13" n="13"/>
the arrival of enthusiastic, shouting volunteers. The hotels and
homes were crowded with visiting statesmen and private citizens,
gathered by a common impulse around the cradle of the new-born
Confederacy. There was a determined look on every face, a fervid
prayer on every lip, and a bounding hope in every heart. There was
the rumbling of wagons distributing arms and ammunition at every
camp, and the tramping of freshly enlisted men, on every street.
There was a roar of cannon on the hills and around the Capitol
booming welcome to the incoming patriots; and all nature seemed
palpitating in sympathy with the intensity of popular excitement. It
fell to the lot of the Raccoon Roughs to be assigned to the Sixth
Alabama Regiment, and, contrary to my wishes and most
unexpectedly to me, I was unanimously elected major.</p>
          <p>When my company of mountaineers reached Montgomery,
the Provisional Government of the “Confederate States of
America” had been organized. At first it was composed only of
six States: South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida,
Mississippi, and Louisiana. The States of Texas, Virginia,
Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina were admitted into the
Southern Union in the order, I believe, in which I have named
them. Thus was launched the New Republic, with only eleven
stars on its banner; but it took as its chart the same old
American Constitution, or one so nearly like it that it contained
the same limitations upon Federal power, the same guarantees of
the rights of the States, the same muniments of public and
personal liberty.</p>
          <p>The historian of the future, who attempts to chronicle the
events of this period and analyze the thoughts and purposes of
the people, will find far greater unanimity at the South than at
the North. This division at the North did not last long; but it
existed in a marked degree for some time after the secession
movement began
<pb id="gord14" n="14"/>
and after twenty or more United States forts, arsenals and
barracks had been seized by State authorities, and even after
the steamer <hi rend="italics">Star of the West</hi> had been fired upon by State
troops and driven back from the entrance of Charleston Harbor.</p>
          <p>At the South, the action of each State in withdrawing from the
Union was the end, practically, of all division within the borders
of such State; and the roar of the opening battle at Fort Sumter
in South Carolina was the signal for practical unanimity at the
North.</p>
          <p>Prior to actual secession there was even at the South more or
less division of sentiment—not as to principle, but as to policy.
Scarcely a man could be found in all the Southern States who
doubted the constitutional <hi rend="italics">right</hi> of a State to withdraw from the
Union; but many of its foremost men thought that such
movement was ill-advised or should be delayed. Among these
were Robert E. Lee, who became the commander-in-chief of all
the Confederate armies; Alexander Hamilton Stephens, who 
became the Confederate Vice-President; Benjamin H. Hill, who
was a Confederate senator and one of the Confederate
administration's most ardent and perhaps its most eloquent
supporter; and even Jefferson Davis himself is said to have shed
tears when, at his seat in the United States Senate, he received
the telegram announcing that Mississippi had actually passed the
ordinance of secession. The speech of Mr. Davis on taking leave
of the Senate shows his loyal devotion to the Republic's flag, for
which he had shed his blood in Mexico. In profoundly sincere
and pathetic words he thus alludes to his unfeigned sorrow at the
thought of parting with the Stars and Stripes. He said: “I shall be
pardoned if I here express the deep sorrow which always
overwhelms me when I think of taking a last leave of that object
of early affection and proud association, feeling that henceforth
<pb id="gord15" n="15"/>
it is not to be the banner which by day and by night I am
ready to follow, to hail with the rising and bless with the setting
sun.”</p>
          <p>He agreed, however, with an overwhelming majority of the
Southern people, in the opinion that both honor and security, as
well as permanent peace, demanded separation. Referring to the denial
of the right of Southerners to
carry their property in slaves into the common Territories, he
said: “Your votes refuse to recognize our domestic institutions,
which preëxisted the formation
of the Union—our property, which was guarded by the
Constitution. You refuse us that equality without which we
should be degraded if we remained in the Union. . . . Is there a
senator on the other side who, to-day, will agree that we shall
have equal enjoyment of the Territories of the United States? Is
there one who will deny that we have equally paid in their
purchases and equally bled in their acquisition in war? . . . Whose
is the fault, then, if the Union be dissolved? . . . If you desire, at
this last moment, to avert civil war, so be it; it is better so. If you will
but allow us to separate from you peaceably,
since we cannot live peaceably together, to leave with the rights
we had before we were united, since we cannot enjoy them in
the Union, then there are many relations, drawn from the
associations of our (common) struggles from the Revolutionary
period to the present day, which
may be beneficial to you as well as to us.”</p>
          <p>Abraham Lincoln, on the other hand, the newly elected
President, was deeply imbued with the conviction that
the future welfare of the Republic demanded that slavery should
be prohibited forever in all the Territories. Indeed, upon such
platform he had been nominated and elected. He, therefore,
urged his friends not to yield on this point. His language was:
“On the territorial question—that is, the question of extending slavery
under national auspices—I am inflexible. I am for no compromise
<pb id="gord16" n="16"/>
which assists or permits the extension of the institution on
soil owned by the Nation.” <ref targOrder="U" id="ref11" rend="sc" target="note11">*</ref></p>
          <p>Thus these two great leaders of antagonistic sectional thought
were pitted against each other before they had actually taken in
hand the reins of hostile governments. The South in her
marvellous fecundity had given birth to both these illustrious
Americans. Both were of Southern lineage and born under
Southern skies. Indeed, they were born within a few months and
miles of each other, and nurtured by Kentucky as their common
mother. But they were destined in God's mysterious providence
to find homes in different sections, to grow up under different
institutions, to imbibe in youth and early manhood opposing
theories of constitutional construction, to become the most
conspicuous representatives of conflicting civilizations, and the
respective Presidents of contending republics.</p>
          <p>After long, arduous, and distinguished services to
their country and to liberty, both of these great sons of
the South were doomed to end their brilliant careers in
a manner shocking to the sentiment of enlightened
Christendom. The one was to die disfranchised by the
Government he had long and faithfully served and for
the triumph of whose flag he had repeatedly pledged his
life. The other was to meet his death by an assassin's
bullet, at a period when his life, more than that of any
other man, seemed essential to the speedy pacification
of his country.</p>
          <p>As stated, there was less division of sentiment in the South at
this period than at the North. It is a great mistake to suppose, as
was believed by Northern people, that Southern politicians were
“dragooning the masses,” or beguiling them into secession. The
literal truth is that the people were leading the leaders. The rush
of volunteers was so great when we reached Montgomery
<note id="note11" n="11" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref11"><p>* Letter to Seward, February 1.</p></note>
<pb id="gord17" n="17"/>
that my company, the Raccoon Roughs, felt that they
were the favorites of fortune when they found the company
enrolled among the “accepted.” Hon. L. P. Walker, of Alabama,
the first Secretary of War, was literally overwhelmed by the vast
numbers wishing to enlist. The applicants in companies and
regiments fatigued and bewildered him. The pressure was so
great during his office hours that comparatively few of those
who sought places in the fighting line could reach him. With a
military ardor and patriotic enthusiasm rarely equalled in any age,
the volunteers actually waylaid the War Secretary on the streets
to urge him to accept at once their services. He stated that he
found it necessary, when leaving his office for his hotel, to go by
some unfrequented way, to avoid the persistent appeals of those
who had commands ready to take the field. Before the
Confederate Government left Montgomery for Richmond, about
360,000 men and boys, representing the best of Southern
manhood, had offered their services, and were ready to pledge
their fortunes and their lives to the cause of Southern
independence. What was the meaning of this unparalleled
spontaneity that pervaded all classes of the Southern people?
The only answer is that it was the impulse of self-defence. One
case will illustrate this unsolicited outburst of martial enthusiasm;
this excess of patriotism above the supposed exigencies of the
hour; this vast surplus of volunteers, beyond the power of the
new Government to arm. Mr. W. C. Heyward, of South
Carolina, was a gentleman of fortune and a West Pointer,
graduating in the same class with President Davis. As soon as
the Confederate Government was organized, Mr. Heyward went
to Montgomery in person to tender his services with an entire
regiment. He was unable for some time to obtain even an
interview on the subject, and utterly failed to secure an
acceptance of himself or his regiment. Returning to his home disappointed,
<pb id="gord18" n="18"/>
this wealthy, thoroughly educated, and trained military
man joined the Home Guards, and died doing duty as a private in
the ranks.</p>
          <p>I know of nothing in all history that more brilliantly illustrates
the lofty spirit, the high and holy impulse that sways a people
aroused by the sentiment of self-defence, than this spontaneous
uprising of Southern youth and manhood; than this readiness to
stand for inherited convictions and constitutional rights, as they
understood them; than the marvellous unanimity with which they
rushed to the front with old flint and steel muskets, long-barrelled
squirrel rifles, and double-barrelled shot-guns, in defence of their
soil, their States, their homes, and, as they verily believed, in
defence of imperilled liberty.</p>
          <p>There is no book in existence, I believe, in which the ordinary
reader can find an analysis of the issues between the two
sections, which fairly represents both the North and the South.
Although it would require volumes to contain the great
arguments, I shall attempt here to give a brief summary of the
causes of our sectional controversy, and it will be my purpose to
state the cases of the two sections so impartially that just-minded
people on both sides will admit the statement to be judicially fair.</p>
          <p>The causes of the war will be found at the foundation of our
political fabric, in our complex organism, in the fundamental law,
in the Constitution itself, in the conflicting constructions which it
invited, and in the institution of slavery which it recognized and
was intended to protect. If asked what was the real issue involved
in our unparalleled conflict, the average American citizen will
reply, “The negro”; and it is fair to say that had there been no
slavery there would have been no war. But there would have
been no slavery if the South's protests could have availed when it
was first introduced; and now that it is gone, although its sudden
and violent
<pb id="gord19" n="19"/>
abolition entailed upon the South directly and incidentally a series
of woes which no pen can describe, yet it is true that in no
section would its reëstablishment be more strongly and
universally resisted. The South steadfastly maintains that
responsibility for the presence of this political Pandora's box in
this Western world cannot be laid at her door. When the
Constitution was adopted and the Union formed, slavery existed
in practically all the States; and it is claimed by the Southern
people that its disappearance from the Northern and its
development in the Southern States is due to climatic conditions
and industrial exigencies rather than to the existence or absence
of great moral ideas.</p>
          <p>Slavery was undoubtedly the immediate fomenting cause of
the <sic>woful</sic> American conflict. It was the great political factor
around which the passions of the sections had long been
gathered—the tallest pine in the political forest around whose top
the fiercest lightnings were to blaze and whose trunk was
destined to be shivered in the earthquake shocks of war. But
slavery was far from being the sole cause of the prolonged
conflict. Neither its destruction on the one hand, nor its defence
on the other, was the energizing force that held the contending
armies to four years of bloody work. I apprehend that if all living
Union soldiers were summoned to the witness-stand, every one
of them would testify that it was the preservation of the
American Union and not the destruction of Southern slavery that
induced him to volunteer at the call of his country. As for the
South, it is enough to say that perhaps eighty per cent. of her
armies were neither slave-holders, nor had the remotest interest
in the institution. No other proof, however, is needed than the
undeniable fact that at any period of the war from its beginning
to near its close the South could have saved slavery by simply
laying down its arms and returning to the Union.</p>
          <pb id="gord20" n="20"/>
          <p>We must, therefore, look beyond the institution of slavery for
the fundamental issues which dominated and inspired all classes
of the contending sections. It is not difficult to find them. The
“Old Man Eloquent,” William E. Gladstone, who was perhaps
England's foremost statesman of the century, believed that the
Government formed by our fathers was the noblest political fabric
ever devised by the brain of man. This undoubtedly is true; and
yet before these inspired builders were dead, controversy arose as
to the nature and powers of their free constitutional government.
Indeed, in the very convention that framed the Constitution the
clashing theories and bristling arguments of 1787 presaged the
glistening bayonets of 1861. In the cabinet of the first President,
the contests between Hamilton and Jefferson, representatives of
conflicting constitutional constructions, were so persistent and
fierce as to disturb the harmony of executive councils and tax the
patience of Washington. The disciples of each of these political
prophets numbered in their respective ranks the greatest
statesmen and purest patriots. The followers of each continuously
battled for these conflicting theories with a power and earnestness
worthy of the founders of the Republic. Generation after
generation, in Congress, on the hustings, and through the
press, these irreconcilable doctrines were urged by constitutional
expounders, until their arguments became ingrained into the very
fibre of the brain and conscience of the sections. The long war
of words between the leaders waxed at last into a war of guns
between their followers.</p>
          <p>During the entire life of the Republic the respective rights and
powers of the States and general government had furnished a
question for endless controversy. In process of time this
controversy assumed a somewhat sectional phase. The
dominating thought of the North and of the South may be
summarized in a few sentences.
<pb id="gord21" n="21"/>
The South maintained with the depth of religious conviction that
the Union formed under the Constitution was a Union of consent
and not of force; that the original States were not the creatures
but the creators of the Union; that these States had gained their
independence, their freedom, and their sovereignty from the
mother country, and had not surrendered these on entering the
Union; that by the express terms of the Constitution all rights and
powers not delegated were reserved to the States; and the South
challenged the North to find one trace of authority in that
Constitution for invading and coercing a sovereign State.</p>
          <p>The North, on the other hand, maintained with the utmost
confidence in the correctness of her position that the Union
formed under the Constitution was intended to be perpetual; that
sovereignty was a unit and could not be divided; that whether or
not there was any express power granted in the Constitution for
invading a State, the right of self-preservation was inherent in all
governments; that the life of the Union was essential to the life
of liberty; or, in the words of Webster, “liberty and union are
one and inseparable.”</p>
          <p>To the charge of the North that secession was rebellion and
treason, the South replied that the epithets of rebel and traitor did
not deter her from the assertion of her independence, since
these same epithets had been familiar to the ears of Washington
and Hancock and Adams and Light Horse Harry Lee. In
vindication of her right to secede, she appealed to the essential
doctrine, “the right to govern rests on the consent of the
governed,” and to the right of independent action as among those
reserved by the States. The South appealed to the acts and
opinions of the Fathers and to the report of the Hartford
Convention of New England States asserting the power of each
State to decide as to the remedy for infraction of its rights; to the
petitions
<pb id="gord22" n="22"/>
presented and positions assumed by ex-President John Quincy
Adams; to the contemporaneous declaration of the 8th of January
assemblage in Ohio indicating that 200,000 Democrats in that
State alone were ready to stand guard on the banks of the border
river and resist invasion of Southern territory; and to the repeated
declarations of Horace Greeley and the admission of President
Lincoln himself that there was difficulty on the question of force,
since ours ought to be a fraternal Government.</p>
          <p>In answer to all these points, the North also cited the acts and
opinions of the same Fathers, and urged that the purpose of
those Fathers was to make a more perfect Union and a stronger
government. The North offset the opinions of Greeley and others
by the emphatic declaration of Stephen A. Douglas, the foremost
of Western Democrats, and by the official opinion as to the
power of the Government to collect revenues and enforce laws,
given to President Buchanan by Jere Black, the able Democratic
Attorney-General.</p>
          <p>Thus the opposing arguments drawn from current opinions and
from the actions and opinions of the Fathers were piled mountain
high on both sides. Thus the mighty athletes of debate wrestled
in the political arena, each profoundly convinced of the
righteousness of his position; hurling at each other their ponderous
arguments, which reverberated like angry thunderbolts through
legislative halls, until the whole political atmosphere resounded
with the tumult. Long before a single gun was fired public
sentiment North and South had been lashed into a foaming sea of
passion; and every 
timber in the framework of the Government was ending and
ready to break from “the heaving ground-swell of the
tremendous agitation.” Gradually and naturally in this furnace of
sectional debate, sectional ballots were crystallized into sectional
bullets; and both sides came
<figure id="ill5" entity="gord22"><p>WAR-TIME CAMP IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA, IN THE OLD CITY PARK<lb/>At the extreme left is the old Trout House, the principal hotel at the time; tracks of three of the chief railroads here crossed Whitehall Street, on which the “Intelligencer” office fronted.</p></figure>
<pb id="gord23" n="23"/>
at last to the position formerly held by the great Troup of
Georgia: “The argument is exhausted; we stand to our guns.”</p>
          <p>I submit that this brief and incomplete summary is sufficient to
satisfy those who live after us that these great leaders of
conflicting thought, and their followers who continued the debate in
battle and blood, while in some sense partisans, were in a far
juster sense patriots.</p>
          <p>The opinions of Lee and Grant, from each of whom I briefly
quote, will illustrate in a measure the convictions of their armies.
Every Confederate appreciates the magnanimity exhibited by
General Grant at Appomattox; and it has been my pleasure for
nearly forty years to speak in public and private of his great
qualities. In his personal memoirs, General Grant has left on
record his estimate of the Southern cause. This estimate
represents a strong phase of Northern sentiment, but it is a
sentiment which it is extremely difficult for a Southern man to
comprehend. In speaking of his feelings as “sad and depressed,”
as he rode to meet General Lee and receive the surrender of the
Southern armies at Appomattox, General Grant says: “I felt like
anything rather than rejoicing at the downfall of a foe who had
fought so long and valiantly, and who had suffered so much for a
cause, though that cause was, I believe, <hi rend="italics">one of the worst for
which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the
least excuse.”</hi> He adds: “I do not question, however, the
sincerity of the great mass of those who were opposed to us.”</p>
          <p>The words above quoted, showing General Grant's opinion of
the Southern cause, are italicized by me and not by him. My
object in emphasizing them is to invite special attention to their
marked contrast with the opinions of General Robert E. Lee as
to that same Southern cause. This peerless Confederate soldier
and representative American, than whom no age or country
<pb id="gord24" n="24"/>
ever produced a loftier spirit or more clear-sighted,
conscientious Christian gentleman, in referring, two days before
the surrender, to the apparent hopelessness of our cause, used
these immortal words: <hi rend="italics">“We had, I was satisfied, sacred
principles to maintain and rights to defend for which we
were in duty bound to do our best, even if we perished in the
endeavor.”</hi></p>
          <p>There were those, a few years ago, who were especially
devoted to the somewhat stereotyped phrase that in our Civil
War one side (meaning the North) “was wholly and eternally
right,” while the other side (meaning the South) “was wholly and
eternally wrong.” I might cite those on the Southern side of the
great controversy, equally sincere and fully as able, who would
have been glad to persuade posterity that the North was “wholly
and eternally wrong”; that her people waged war upon sister
States who sought peacefully to set up a homogeneous
government, and meditated no wrong or warfare upon the
remaining sister States. These Southern leaders steadfastly
maintained that the Southern people, in the exercise of the
freedom and sovereign rights purchased by Revolutionary blood,
were asserting a second independence according to the
teachings and example of their fathers.</p>
          <p>But what good is to come to the country from partisan
utterances on either side? My own well-considered and
long-entertained opinion, my settled and profound conviction, the
correctness of which the future will vindicate, is this: that the
one thing which is “wholly and eternally wrong” is the effort of
so-called statesmen to inject one-sided and jaundiced sentiments
into the youth of the country in either section. Such sentiments
are neither consistent with the truth of history, nor conducive to
the future welfare and unity of the Republic. The assumption on
either side of all the righteousness and all the truth would
produce a belittling arrogance,
<pb id="gord25" n="25"/>
and an offensive intolerance of the opposing section; or, if either
section could be persuaded that it was “wholly and eternally
wrong,” it would inevitably destroy the self-respect and manhood
of its people. A far broader, more truthful, and statesmanlike
view was presented by the Hon. A. E. Stevenson, of Illinois,
then Vice-President of the United States, in his opening remarks
as presiding officer at the dedication of the National Park at
Chickamauga. In perfect accord with the sentiment of the
occasion and the spirit which led to the establishment of this
park as a bond of national brotherhood, Mr. Stevenson said:
“Here, in the dread tribunal of last resort, valor contended against
valor. Here brave men struggled and died for the right as God
gave them to see the right.”</p>
          <p>Mr. Stevenson was right—“wholly and eternally right.” Truth,
justice, and patriotism unite in proclaiming that both sides fought
and suffered for liberty as bequeathed by the Fathers—the one
for liberty in the union of the States, the other for liberty in the
independence of the States.</p>
          <p>While the object of these papers is to record my personal
reminiscences and to perpetuate incidents illustrative of the
character of the American soldier, whether he fought on the one
side or the other, I am also moved to write by what I conceive
to be a still higher aim; and that is to point out, if I can, the
common ground on which all may stand; where justification of
one section does not require or imply condemnation of the
other—the broad, high, sunlit middle ground where fact meets fact,
argument confronts argument, and truth is balanced against
truth.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2 type="chapter">
          <pb id="gord26" n="26"/>
          <head>CHAPTER II</head>
          <head>THE TRIP FROM CORINTH</head>
          <argument>
            <p>The Raccoon Roughs made a part of the Sixth Alabama—The journey to
Virginia—Families divided in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Missouri—A father
captured by a son in battle—The military spirit in Virginia—Andrew
Johnson and Parson Brownlow Union leaders in Tennessee—Johnson's narrowness
afterward exhibited as President.</p>
          </argument>
          <p>THE Raccoon Roughs made an imposing twelfth part of the
Sixth Alabama, which was one of the largest regiments in the
Confederate army. Governor Moore, in order to comply with his
promise to incorporate my company into one of the first
regiments to be organized, consented that the Sixth should
contain twelve instead of the regulation number of ten
companies. A movement had been started in Atlanta to uniform
my mountaineers: but when the message was received from
Governor Moore, inviting us to come to Montgomery, all thought
of uniformity in dress was lost in the enthusiasm evoked by the
knowledge that our services were accepted; and even after the
hastily prepared uniforms were issued by the new Government
my company clung tenaciously to “coonskin” head-dress, which
made a striking contrast to the gray caps worn by the other
companies.</p>
          <p>No regulation uniform had at this time been adopted for field
officers, and in deference to the wishes and the somewhat
quaint taste of Colonel Seibles, the regimental commander, the
mounted officers of the Sixth wore double-breasted
<pb id="gord27" n="27"/>
frock-coats made of green broadcloth, with the brass
buttons of the United States army. These green coats—more
suited to Irishmen than to Americans—were not discarded during
the entire term of our first enlistment for twelve months, nor until
we were enrolled as a part of the army that was to serve until
Southern independence was won or lost. I do not know what became of
my bottle-green coat, with the bullet-holes through it, which
would now be an object of interest to my children. It is
remarkable that during the war no care was taken of any of
these battle-marked articles. All minds and hearts were
absorbed in the one thought of defence. It was a long time
before even the flags borne in battle became objects of special
veneration, or gathered about them the sentiment which grew
into a passion as the war neared its close. After one of the early
battles one of my color-bearers had secured and fastened to the
staff a beautiful new flag. When I asked him what he had done
with the old one, he replied:</p>
          <p>“I threw it away, sir. It was so badly shot that it was not
worth keeping.”</p>
          <p>Our departure from Montgomery for Corinth, Mississippi,
where we were to go into camp of instruction for an indefinite
period, was amid the roar of cannon, the shouts of the multitude,
the waving of flags and handkerchiefs, and the prayers and
tears of mothers, wives, and sisters. The encampment at Corinth
was brief and uneventful; but our trip thence to Virginia was
intensely interesting, because of the danger and threat of conflict
between my troops and the citizens in certain localities. The line
of our travel was through East Tennessee, where, even at that
early period, there were evidences of the radical conflict of
opinion between neighbors which was destined to eventuate in
many bloody feuds. At the depots crowds of men were
gathered, some cheering, some jeering, my troops as they
passed. From the tops
<pb id="gord28" n="28"/>
of houses on one side of the street floated the Stars and Stripes;
from those on the other were ensigns showing sympathy with
the new-born Confederacy. The responsibility on my shoulders
was not a light one, for it was my duty on every account to
restrain the ardor of my own men and prevent the slightest
imprudence of speech or action. No other locality approached
East Tennessee in the extent of suffering from this peculiarly
harassing sort of strife, unless possibly it was the State of
Kentucky. In both public sentiment was divided. There was
intense loyalty to the Union on the one hand, and to the
Confederate cause on the other.</p>
          <p>War's visage is grim enough at best; and to the people of
those localities which were constantly subjected to raids, first by
one side and then by the other, its frowning face was rarely
relieved by one gleam of alleviating tenderness. These divided
communities were the fated grist which the demon of border
war seemed determined to grind to dust between his upper and
nether millstones.</p>
          <p>In East Tennessee, Kentucky, and Missouri, neighbors who had
been lifelong friends became extremely embittered. Families were
divided, brother against brother, and father against son. In
Kentucky, it will be remembered, many of the most prominent
families of the State, among them the Breckinridges, the Clays,
and the Crittendens, were represented in both the Confederate
and Union armies. John C. Breckinridge, who had just left the
seat of Vice-President of the United States, and who had been
the candidate of one wing of the Democratic party for President,
cast his fortunes with the South, and made a brilliant record as a
soldier and as the last Confederate Secretary of War. Other
members of this distinguished family filled honorable
positions in the opposing armies, and the distinguished and
somewhat eccentric divine, the Rev. Robert J. Breckinridge,
<pb id="gord29" n="29"/>
was one of the most eloquent and fervid—not to say bitter— 
advocates of the Union cause. His trenchant pen and lashing
tongue spared neither blood relatives nor ministers nor members
of the church, not even those of the same faith with himself,
provided he regarded them as untrue to the Union. The intensity
of Dr. Breckinridge's antagonism showed itself even on his death-bed.
He and the Rev. Dr. Stuart Robinson, of Kentucky, were
both eminent ministers of the same church, Dr. Robinson being
as intense a sympathizer with the South as Dr. Breckinridge was
with the North. From devoted friends they became fierce
antagonists and uncompromising foes. When Dr. Breckinridge
lay on his death-bed, his family and some of his church-members
were gathered around him. They were most anxious that he
should be reconciled to all men, and especially to Dr. Robinson,
before he died, and they asked him,
“Brother Breckinridge, have you forgiven all your enemies?”</p>
          <p>“Oh, yes; certainly, certainly I have.”</p>
          <p>“Well, Brother Breckinridge, have you forgiven our brother
Dr. Stuart Robinson?”</p>
          <p>“Certainly I have. Didn't I just tell you that I had forgiven all
my enemies?”</p>
          <p>“But, Brother Breckinridge, when you meet Brother Stuart
Robinson in heaven, do you feel that you can greet him as all the
redeemed ought to greet one another?”</p>
          <p>“Don't bother me with such questions. Stuart Robinson will
never get there!”</p>
          <p>During the year 1895 I was honored with an invitation to
address an audience in Maysville, Kentucky. I was deeply
impressed by the fact conveyed to me that a large number of
those who sat before me had the harmony and happiness of their
homes destroyed for the four years of war by the inexpressibly
horrid
<pb id="gord30" n="30"/>
thought that sons of the same parents were pitted against each
other in battle. I was personally presented to a number of these
formerly divided brothers who had bravely fought from the
beginning to the end in opposing lines, but were now reunited
under the old family roof and in the common Republic. It was a
Kentucky father, I believe, both of whose sons had been killed in
battle, the one in the Confederate, the other in the Union army,
who erected to the memory of both over their common grave
the monument on which he had inscribed these five
monosyllables: “God knows which was right.”</p>
          <p>So much has been said and written of the peculiar trials and
horrors experienced by the divided communities in Missouri, East
Tennessee, and Kentucky that it is a privilege to record one of
the incidents which at rare intervals sent rays of light through
those unhappy localities. Major Edwards, of the Confederate
army, who afterward became an editor of distinction in Missouri,
had, at the beginning of the war, a neighbor and friend who was
as intense a Unionist as the major was an enthusiastic
Confederate. Each felt it his duty to go into the service, and
when the war came they parted to take their places in opposing
battle lines. Later on, Major Edwards captured this former
neighbor and friend behind the Southern lines, and near their
Missouri home. In reply to the question as to why he had taken
such risk of being captured and sent to a Southern prison, the
Union soldier explained that his wife was behind those lines and
extremely ill—probably dying; that he had taken the risk of slipping
at night, between the Confederate picket posts in order to
receive her last blessing and embrace. This statement was
enough for the knightly man in gray. The Union soldier was at
once made a prisoner, but only in the bonds of brotherly
tenderness. His house was carefully guarded by Major Edwards
himself until the sad parting with his
<pb id="gord31" n="31"/>
wife was over, and then he was safely conducted through the
Confederate lines and sent with a Confederate's sympathy to his
post of duty in the Union camps.</p>
          <p>At a recent reunion of the United Confederate Veterans, I
was told of a thrilling incident which still further and more
strikingly illustrates the tragedy of war in these divided States. At
the beginning of the war Major M. H. Clift, of Tennessee, was a
mere lad, and was attending school in another State. His father
was an East Tennesseean and was devoted to the cause of the
Union. Young Clift, however, was carried away by the storm of
Southern enthusiasm and joined the Confederate army. The
father soon yielded to his own sense of patriotic duty, and
enlisted in one of the Union regiments formed in the
neighborhood. In the fortunes of war, the two, father and son,
were soon called to confront each other under hostile banners
and in battle array. Neither had the remotest thought that the
other stood in his front. In a furious charge by the Southern lines
this young Confederate forced a Union soldier to surrender to
him. Looking into the captured soldier's face, the young man
recognized his own father. No pen could adequately depict his
consternation when he realized that he had been on the point of
killing his father, nor the joy which filled his heart that this dire
calamity had been averted. Steps were at once taken to render it
certain that no such contingency should again occur.</p>
          <p>But the horrors of family division were not confined to these
States. There were conspicuous instances elsewhere of the
disruption of the most sacred ties. The Virginia kindred of that
able soldier General George H. Thomas, and of ex-President
Harrison, were in the Confederate service, while those of
Generals Lovell and Pemberton, who fought for the Southern
cause, and of Mrs. General Longstreet, supported the flag of the
Union.</p>
          <p>In my own State the wife of a Confederate officer saw
<pb id="gord32" n="32"/>
her husband retreat from Savannah under the Confederate
commander, while her own dearly loved kindred marched into
the town under General W. T. Sherman. This wife was Nellie
Kinsey, said to be the first white child born in Chicago. She grew
to accomplished womanhood, and married William W. Gordon of
Savannah, who made a brilliant record as a Confederate officer,
and during our recent war with Spain was commissioned
brigadier-general by President McKinley. Mrs. Gordon was
intensely loyal to her husband and to the cause he loved, but her
kindred—her only kindred—were in the Union army and
conspicuous for their gallantry in almost every arm of the
service. As she stood with her children watching the Federal
troops march in triumphant array under the windows of her
Southern home, a splendid brass band at the head of one of the
divisions began playing that familiar old air, “When this Cruel
War is Over.” As soon as the notes struck the ears of her little
daughter, this enthusiastic young Confederate exclaimed,
“Mamma, just listen to the Yankees playing ‘When this Cruel War is Over,’ and
they just doing it themselves!”</p>
          <p>When we reached Virginia the military spirit was in full flood-tide.
The State had just passed the ordinance of secession, and
almost every young and middle-aged man was volunteering for
service. Even the servants were becoming interested in the
military positions to which the aspiring young men of the
household might be assigned. I recall an incident so strikingly
characteristic that it seems due to a proper appreciation of these
old-time loyal and faithful slaves that I give it in this connection.</p>
          <p>Old Simon was the trusted and devoted butler of a leading
Virginia family, and was very proud of his young master, who
had just enlisted as a private in the cavalry, and, dressed in his
new uniform and mounted
<figure id="ill6" entity="gord32"><p>JOHN B. GORDON<lb/>Drawn by George T. Tobin from a daguerreotype taken at the age of twenty-two.</p></figure>
<pb id="gord33" n="33"/>
upon his blooded horse, was drilling every day with his
company. He was, in old Simon's estimation, the equal, if not the
superior, of any soldier that was ever booted and spurred. The
time came for the company to start
to the front, and one of them rode up and asked old Simon:</p>
          <p>“Is Bob here, Simon, or has he gone to camp?”</p>
          <p>“Is you talking about my young marster, <hi rend="italics">Colonel Robert?</hi>”</p>
          <p>“Yes; of course I am, Simon,” replied the trooper.
“But I should like to know how in the - - - Bob got to be a colonel?”</p>
          <p>“Lawd, sir, he 's des born a colonel!” said Simon; and his
genuine and unaffected pride in this belief
flashed in his old eyes and rang in his tones.</p>
          <p>No account of East Tennessee's condition and experiences at
this period would be complete without a few
words in reference to those impetuous East Tennessee Union
leaders, Andrew Johnson, who afterward became President, and
the redoubtable Parson Brownlow, whose fiery denunciations of
the Southern cause filled the columns of his paper, “Brownlow's
Whig.” Lifelong political antagonists, the one a Democrat, the
other a Whig, and both aggressive and unrelenting, they nevertheless,
when civil war approached, buried the partisan tomahawk and
wielded the Union battle-axe side by side. They became
coadjutors and the most powerful civil
supporters of the Union cause in the State, if not in the South.
Andrew Johnson, as is well known, was a tailor when a young
man, and, it is said, was taught to read by his faithful wife. He
deserved and received immense credit for the laborious study
and untiring perseverance which converted the scissors of his
shop into the sceptre of Chief Executive of the world's greatest
Republic; but
he did not broaden in sentiment in proportion to the elevation
he attained and the gravity of the responsibilities
<pb id="gord34" n="34"/>
imposed. He was strong but narrow. He could not be a
statesman in the highest sense of that term, because he was
swayed by prejudice more than by lofty convictions. That he was
impelled by motives intensely patriotic in adhering to the Union
there can be no reasonable doubt; but his utter failure to rise to a
full conception of the situation in which he found himself after
President Lincoln's unfortunate death was painfully apparent to
every thoughtful observer. His intolerant bigotry, and his failure to
appreciate the obligations imposed upon him by General Grant's
magnanimous and solemn compact with the Southern army at
Appomattox, were manifested by his desire to arrest General Lee
and other prominent prisoners of war who had protecting paroles.
His blind prejudice against our best people was shown in his
selection of classes for amnesty; and the low plane on which he
planted his administration was evidenced by his inconsistencies, his
vacillations, and his reversal of the wise, generous, and
statesmanly policy of his great predecessor. But the narrowness
of the man and the amazing absurdity of his prejudice are
sufficiently exhibited in a circumstance trivial in itself, but which,
perhaps on that account, more clearly indicates his calibre. A few
months after the war was over, I was passing through
Washington, and called to pay my respects to General Grant, who
had shown me personally, at the close of hostilities, marked
consideration and kindness, of which I shall make mention in
another chapter. General Grant offered to introduce me to
President Johnson, whom I had never met. We walked across to
the Executive Mansion, and General Grant gave the usher a card
on which was written, “General Grant, with General Gordon of
Georgia,” with instructions to the usher to hand it to the President.
We were at once admitted to his presence, and I was introduced
by General Grant as “General Gordon,” with
<pb id="gord35" n="35"/>
some complimentary reference to my rank and service in
General Lee's army. The President met this introduction by
these words, pronounced with peculiar emphasis, “How are you,
Mr. Gordon?” especially accentuating the word Mister. I was neither angry nor
indignant, but
my contempt was sincere for the ineffable littleness of the man
whose untimely ascendancy to
power at that critical period I can but regard as the veriest
mockery of fate.</p>
          <p>Contrast this foolish and abortive effort at insult with the
conduct of President Grant, who succeeded him, or of General
Grant as soldier, or with that of any other
prominent soldier or high-minded citizen of the country. The
conduct of General Hancock at General Grant's funeral in New
York is perhaps in still greater contrast
with that of President Johnson. Although the incident I am about
to relate is chronologically out of place here,
it is emphatically in place as illustrating the point I am making in
reference to President Johnson.</p>
          <p>It will be remembered that General Hancock was
commander of the Department of the East (United States army)
at the time of General Grant's death, and was, by reason of his
military rank, the chief marshal of that stupendous and most
impressive pageant witnessed in New York at General Grant's
obsequies. I was included among those ex-Confederate officers
who had been specially invited to participate in the honors to be paid
to the dead soldier and former President. General Hancock had
requested that I should ride with him at the head of the mighty
procession, and he had
playfully said to the staff that each of us should take his place
according to rank. Of course I had no thought of claiming any
rank, and I took my place in the rear of the regular staff.
General Hancock sent one after an other of his immediate staff
to request me to ride up to the front, with the message that I
must obey orders and
<pb id="gord36" n="36"/>
report to him at once at the head of the column. When I reached
the head of the column, General Hancock directed the staff to
compare dates and ascertain the ranking officer who should ride
on his right. My rank as a Confederate general was higher than
that of any other member of his staff, and he ordered that I
should take the place of honor. As I could not gracefully resist
this assignment any longer, I accepted it, saying to the Union
generals, who also served on General Hancock's staff, that they
had overwhelmed me some twenty-odd years before, but that I
had them down now. General Fitzhugh Lee was similarly
honored.</p>
          <p>In closing this chapter, it is not necessary, I trust, for me to say
that I would do no injustice to the memory of President Johnson,
but it seems to me that the future manhood of our country can be
ennobled by the contemplation of the marked and notable
contrasts here presented, and by a realization of the truth that no
station in life, however conspicuous, can conceal from view the
weakness of its possessor. Certainly it can inflict no damage
upon the character of our youth to let them understand that the
gulf is both broad and deep which separates the highest type of
courage from petty and ignoble spite, and that the line which
divides true nobility of soul from narrowness of spirit was drawn
by God's hand, and will become clearer to human apprehension
as we approach nearer to Him in thought and action.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2 type="chapter">
          <pb id="gord37" n="37"/>
          <head>CHAPTER III</head>
          <head>BULL RUN OR MANASSAS</head>
          <argument>
            <p>The first great battle of the war—A series of surprises—Mishaps and
mistakes of the Confederates—Beauregard's lost order—General Ewell's
rage—The most eccentric officer in the Confederate army—Anecdotes of his
career—The wild panic of the Union troops—Senseless frights that cannot
be explained— Illustrated at Cedar Creek.</p>
          </argument>
          <p>THE battle of Bull Run or Manassas was the first, and in many
respects the most remarkable, battle of our Civil War. It was a
series of surprises—the unexpected happening at almost every
moment of its progress. Planned by the Union chieftain with
consummate skill, executed for the most part with unquestioned
ability, and fought by the Union troops for a time with
magnificent courage, it ended at last in their disastrous rout and
the official decapitation of their able commander. On the
Confederate side it was a chapter of mishaps, miscarriages, and
of some mistakes. It was also a chapter of superb fighting by the
Southern army, and of final complete and overwhelming victory.
The breaking down of the train bearing General Joseph E.
Johnston's troops was an accident which almost defeated the
consummation of that splendid piece of strategy by which he had
eluded General Patterson in the Valley, and which had enabled
him to hurry almost his entire force to the support of General
Beauregard at Manassas. The mistakes are represented by the
fact that the feint of General McDowell on the Confederate front
was believed
<pb id="gord38" n="38"/>
to be the real attack, until the Union general was hurling his
army on Beauregard's flank. Finally, the most serious
miscarriage was that the order from Beauregard to Ewell
directing an assault on the Union left failed to reach that officer.
This strange miscarriage prevented General Ewell from making a
movement which it then seemed probable and now appears
certain would have added materially to McDowell's disaster. I
had already been instructed by him to make a reconnaissance in
the direction of the anticipated assault, but I had been suddenly
recalled just as my skirmishers were opening fire. I was recalled
because General Ewell had not received the promised order. For
me it was perhaps a most fortunate recall, for in my isolated
position I should probably have been surrounded and my little
command cut to pieces. On my return I found General Ewell in
an agony of suspense. He was chafing like a caged lion,
infuriated by the scent of blood. He would mount his horse one
moment and dismount the next. He would walk rapidly to and fro,
muttering to himself, “No orders, no orders.” General Ewell, who
afterward became a corps commander, had in many respects the
most unique personality I have ever known. He was a compound
of anomalies, the oddest, most eccentric genius in the
Confederate army. He was my friend, and I was sincerely and
deeply attached to him. No man had a better heart nor a worse
manner of showing it. He was in truth as tender and sympathetic
as a woman, but, even under slight provocation, he became
externally as rough as a polar bear, and the needles with which
he pricked sensibilities were more numerous and keener than
porcupines' quills. His written orders were full, accurate, and
lucid; but his verbal orders or directions, especially when under
intense excitement, no man could comprehend. At such times his
eyes would flash with a peculiar brilliancy, and his brain far
outran his tongue.
<pb id="gord39" n="39"/>
His thoughts would leap across great gaps which his words
never touched, but which he expected his listener to fill up by
intuition, and woe to the dull subordinate who failed to
understand him!</p>
          <p>When he was first assigned to command at the beginning of
the war, he had recently returned from fighting Indians on the
Western frontier. He had been dealing only with the enlisted men
of the standing army. His experience in that wild border life,
away from churches, civilization, and the refining influences of
woman's society, were not particularly conducive to the
development of the softer and better side of his nature. He
became a very pious man in his later years, but at this time he
was not choice in the manner of expressing himself. He asked
me to take a hasty breakfast with him just before he expected
the order from Beauregard to ford Bull Run and rush upon
McDowell's left. His verbal invitation was in these words:
“Come and eat a cracker with me; we will breakfast together
here and dine together in hell.” To a young officer like myself,
who had never been under fire except at long range, on scouting
excursions, or on the skirmish-line, such an invitation was not
inspiring or appetizing; but Ewell's spirits seemed to be in a flutter
of exultation.</p>
          <p>An hour later, after I had been recalled from my perilous
movement to “feel of the enemy,” I found General Ewell, as I
have said, almost frenzied with anxiety over the non-arrival of
the anticipated order to move to the attack. He directed me to
send to him at once a mounted man “with sense enough to go
and find out what was the matter.” I ordered a member of the
governor's Horse Guard to report immediately to General Ewell.
This troop represented some of the best blood of Virginia. Its
privates were refined and accomplished gentlemen, many of
them University graduates, who, at the first tocsin of war, had
sprung into their saddles as volunteers.</p>
          <pb id="gord40" n="40"/>
          <p>The intelligent young trooper who was selected to ride upon
this most important mission under the verbal direction of General
Ewell himself, mounted his high-spirited horse, and, with high-top
boots, polished spurs, and clanking sabre, galloped away to where
the general was impatiently waiting at his temporary headquarters
on the hill. Before this inexperienced but promising young soldier
had time to lift his hat in respectful salutation, the general was
slashing away with tongue and finger, delivering his directions with
such rapidity and incompleteness that the young man's thoughts
were dancing through his brain in inextricable confusion. The
general, having thus delivered himself, quickly asked, “Do you
understand, sir?” Of course the young man did not understand, and
he began timidly to ask for a little more explicit information. The
fiery old soldier cut short the interview with “Go away from here
and send me a man who has some sense!”</p>
          <p>Later in the war, when I was commanding a division in
Stonewall Jackson's old corps, then commanded by General
Ewell, I had a very similar experience with this eccentric officer.
It was in the midst of one of the battles between Lee and Grant
in the Wilderness. As already explained, General Ewell's spirits,
like the eagle's wings gathering additional power in the storm,
seemed to mount higher and higher as the fury of the battle
increased. My division of his corps was advancing under a
galling fire. General Ewell rode at full speed to the point where I
was intensely engaged directing the charge, and asked me to
lend him one of my staff, his own all having been despatched
with orders to different portions of the field. I indicated a staff-officer
whom he might command, and he began, in his
characteristic style under excitement, to tell this officer what to
do. My staff-officer had learned to interpret the general fairly
well, but
<pb id="gord41" n="41"/>
to catch his meaning at one point stopped him and said: “Let me
see if I understand you, sir?” General Ewell was so incensed at
this insinuation of lack of perspicuity that he turned away
abruptly, without a word of explanation simply throwing up his
hand and blowing away the young officer with a sort of
“whoo-oo-oot.” There is no way to spell out this indignant and
resounding puff; but even in the fierce battle that was raging
there was a roar of laughter from the other members of my staff
as the droll and doughty warrior rushed away to another part of
the field.</p>
          <p>I cannot conclude this imperfect portrayal of the peculiarities
of this splendid soldier and eccentric genius without placing upon
record one more incident connected with the first battle of Bull
Run. While he waited for the order from Beauregard (which
never came), I sat on my horse near him as he was directing the
location of a battery to cover the ford, and fire upon a Union
battery and its supports on the opposite hills. As our guns were
unlimbered, a young lady, who had been caught between the
lines of the two armies, galloped up to where the general and I
were sitting on our horses, and began to tell the story of what
she had seen. She had mounted her horse just in front of General
McDowell's troops, who it was expected would attempt to force
a crossing at this point. This Virginia girl, who appeared to be
seventeen or eighteen years of age, was in a flutter of martial
excitement. She was profoundly impressed with the belief that
she really had something of importance to tell. The information
which she was trying to convey to General Ewell she was sure
would be of vast import to the Confederate cause, and she was
bound to deliver it. General Ewell listened to her for a few
minutes, and then called her attention to the Union batteries that
were rushing into position and getting ready to open fire upon the
Confederate lines. He said to her, in
<pb id="gord42" n="42"/>
his quick, quaint manner: “Look there, look there, miss! Don't
you see those men with blue clothes on, in the edge of the
woods? Look at those men loading those big guns. They are
going to fire, and fire quick, and fire right here. You 'll get killed.
You 'll be a <hi rend="italics">dea