Funding from the Library of
Congress/Ameritech National Digital
Library
Competition
supported the electronic publication of this
title.
Text scanned (OCR) by
Teresa Church
Images scanned by
Beth Novak
Text encoded by
Jordan Davis and Natalia
Smith
First edition,
1998.
ca. 700K
Academic Affairs Library, UNC-CH
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
1998.
© This work is the
property of the
University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for
research, teaching and personal use as long as this statement
of availability is included in the text.
The electronic edition is
a part of the UNC-CH
digitization project, Documenting
the American South, or, The Southern Experience in
19th-century America.
Any hyphens occurring in
line breaks have
been removed, and the trailing part of a word has been joined
to the preceding line.
All quotation marks and ampersand have been transcribed as
entity references.
All double right and left
quotation marks are encoded as
" and "
respectively.
All single right and left
quotation marks are encoded as
' and ' respectively.
Indentation in lines has
not been preserved.
Running titles have not
been preserved.
Spell-check and
verification made against printed text
using Author/Editor (SoftQuad) and Microsoft Word spell check programs.
Library of Congress
Subject Headings, 19th edition, 1996
EDITED BY
WILLIAM DALLAM ARMES
COPYRIGHT, 1903
BY D. APPLETON AND COMPANY
During the illness of his daughter in California in 1900 Professor Le Conte had many long talks with her about his early experiences and was by her urged to write out an account of them for his family. He was then too busy preparing for a trip abroad to undertake the work; but later in the year, in his old home in Columbia, S. C., whither he had gone from New York to recuperate from a severe illness that interfered with his plan of visiting Europe, his thoughts reverted to her request, and in this period of enforced leisure he began to write his reminiscences. In the midst of the scenes in
which the events that he was narrating occurred, and surrounded by his children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, for whom the manuscript was intended and to whom from time to time portions of it were read, he wrote con amore, and what was originally intended as a sketch became a detailed autobiography. On his return to California early in 1901 he continued the work, but with flagging interest, the latter years of his life being treated in a comparatively summary manner. Fortunately, however, the account was brought down to a few months before his death, and concluded with a statement of what he himself considered of most value in his life-work.
After his death a number of his colleagues were asked to prepare biographical memoirs for publication by the various scientific associations of which he was a member, and were permitted to use the "autobiographic sketch." Their extracts from it attracted attention, and the family was urged to have the whole edited and published. Somewhat reluctantly they acceded to the request of his friends, and to me was given the honor of preparing for the press the last work of my old teacher.
The question of the future publication of
the work had been suggested to Professor Le Conte by his daughter, and he had answered that it certainly could not be published in the shape in which he left it, but that it would be a rich store of material for any possible future biographer. No implied trust was violated, therefore, either in having the manuscript published or in having it edited.
My desire has been to treat the manuscript with all due reverence, but many changes have been necessary. Many omissions had to be made, as, owing to its origin and the purpose for which it was originally written, it contained much that was too intimately personal and much of too little general interest for publication. On the other hand, many lacunæ had to be filled, for in a number of instances Professor Le Conte merely referred to what he had written elsewhere. His personal experiences during the last days of the Confederacy, for instance, are told in briefest outline in a single paragraph in the manuscript and reference made to a detailed account written immediately after the events. An abstract of this journal, itself a manuscript as long as the autobiographic sketch, has therefore been substituted for the paragraph and forms Chapters VII and VIII of the book. In
other similar instances use has been made of Professor Le Conte's letters and published writings. A certain amount of rearrangement of the material in the manuscript, moreover, was necessitated by the division of the long, continuous narrative into chapters of approximately equal length. The titles of Professor Le Conte's publications, which he, writing currente calamo and with no time for verification, frequently cited in the manuscript in general terms or somewhat inaccurately, are in the book taken directly from the articles, to which references are given in foot-notes for the convenience of those desiring to read them.
With all these changes it has been the editor's desire to preserve the tone and spirit of the original. That the style is frequently colloquial seems to him no defect, for he wished so far as possible to retain all that would tend to reveal the man to those who knew only the author. To them he was the patient investigator, the wise scientist, the fearless, independent, truth-loving thinker; to those who knew him personally, and particularly to those who had the inestimable privilege of being numbered among his "boys and girls," he was all this, but, first and foremost, he was the
gentle, kindly spirit, the welcome companion and helpful friend, our beloved "Professor Joe."
The manuscript was finished such a short time before Professor Le Conte's death that there is but little to add as to the events of his life. His own account ends, "I still hope to finish my year of absence in Europe, but I know not. My son is to marry in June and much desires that I should be present at his wedding." He yielded to the desire, gave up all thought of another European trip, and remained quietly in Berkeley until the marriage-day, June tenth. The departure of the young couple on a wedding-trip to the King's River cañon and the High Sierra thereabouts awakened in him a longing for the mountains and a desire to show the wonders of the Yosemite to his daughter, Mrs. Davis, who had come from South Carolina to be present at her brother's wedding. The Sierra Club, of which he had been an active and enthusiastic member since its organization, was planning a large excursion to the valley and he determined to join it, though warned by his devoted wife that his strength and power of endurance were by no means what they formerly were.
By an odd coincidence he met at the railway station in Oakland one of his companions on his first visit to the Yosemite, Professor Frank Soulé, and together they sped in luxurious cars and comfortable stages over the long, hot miles they had weariedly ridden thirty-one years before. In the January, 1902, number of the Sierra Club Bulletin Professor Soulé published an article on Joseph Le Conte in the Sierra, in which he gives the facts as to the last days of his old friend. He writes: "He was happy at the thought of revisiting (for the eleventh time) the great Yosemite, and of showing to his dear ones the unrivaled scenery of that mountain fastness.
"Standing upon the veranda of the hotel at Wawona, he said to me: 'I have retraced in memory every day's march of our excursion in 1870. Can you point out our camping-ground here at Wawona?'
"I looked around me and confessed that I could not; the place was so greatly changed and built upon.
"With a pleasant smile and a merry chuckle of triumphant recollection, he pointed along the front line of the veranda to the open field near the stream, and said: 'Do you see those three
trees standing together? Well, there were four of them thirty-one years ago, and you and I spread our blankets beneath their branches.'
" 'Yes, I recall it all now,' I replied. And I marveled at his wonderful memory."
He arrived at the camp at the base of Glacier Point on the third of July considerably fatigued but in his usual high spirits. For the next two days he was the life of the party, driving with his daughter all over the valley, walking to near-by points of interest, and explaining the geological phenomena to crowds of eager listeners. On the evening of the fifth, while very tired from a tramp, he ate a hearty dinner, and soon afterward complained of a severe pain in the region of the heart. A physician was at once summoned and diagnosed the trouble as angina pectoris, and with this diagnosis Professor Le Conte, himself a physician, agreed. Everything possible was done to relieve the sufferer, and in the morning he seemed much better. But about ten o'clock, while the physician was absent procuring additional remedies, he turned upon his left side, and at once his daughter saw a great change come over his countenance. "Do not lie upon your left side, father," she cried. "You know it is not good for you." With a
smile he answered, "It does not matter, daughter." They were his last words. Five minutes later the happy-starred, light-searching spirit had found its way to the source of all happiness and light.
That evening a coach slowly made its way across the floor of the valley. On one seat was the stricken daughter with a faithful friend, on the other a casket buried from sight beneath laurel wreaths, pine boughs, and the wild flowers of the Yosemite. Following it scores of California students and graduates walked with uncovered heads. Halting at the foot of the grade, they watched with straining eyes the coach with its mournful burden toil up the long, lonely mountain road till it disappeared in the darkness, then slowly returned to camp, each with a feeling of personal loss. Five days later the words of the funeral service were spoken in the presence of a vast throng that testified to the grief of all classes of citizens, and all that was mortal of Joseph Le Conte was laid away beside that beloved brother from whom he had so seldom been separated and for whom he had never ceased to mourn. There he rests in the beautiful Mountain View cemetery, his grave marked by a huge boulder from near the spot
where he died in the Yosemite that he had loved so long and so well.
"When the Greeks made their fine saying that those whom the gods love die young, I can not help believing they had this sort of death also in their eye. For surely, at whatever age it overtake the man, this is to die young."
W. D. A.
UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA,
BERKELEY, February, 1903.
The name Le Conte was continued through Pierre, the second son, through whose wife, Valeria Eatton, the Le Conte family is connected,
though now but distantly, with many distinguished families in the United States, among them the Biddle, Baird, and Berrien. Of the children of Pierre, who was a physician, several moved South and lived in Bryan and Liberty Counties, Georgia; some permanently, as William; some only in winter, as John Eatton.
William, a lawyer, lived partly in Savannah and partly at "Sans Souci," his plantation on the Ogeechee River. He took a very prominent part in the revolutionary movement in Georgia; having been appointed a member of the first Council of Safety for the Province of Georgia, on June 22, 1775; and of the Provincial Congress that met at Savannah on July 4 of the same year. As a member of the Council, he signed a letter of remonstrance directed to Sir James Wright, Royal Governor of Georgia, and was therefore named on the so-called "blacklist" that Sir James sent to King George; he is there termed "Rebel Counselor." He died in Savannah without issue.
John Eatton, the second son, from whom descended all subsequent Le Contes, was the grandfather of the present writer. He was born on September 2, 1739; and died in New Jersey on January 4, 1822, when in his eighty-third
year. He spent his summers in New York and his winters on his plantation, "Woodmanston," in Liberty County, Georgia. How large a part he took in the revolutionary struggle, I do not know. I know, however, that he was regarded as a malignant and a rebel, and that his house, near the Barrington road, was burned by Colonel Provost in his march through Liberty on his way to the Indian territory. The ruins of the old well are still visible, and a laurel-tree (Magnolia grandiflora) that ornamented the yard still stands. I find it recorded in the History of Georgia, moreover, that Dr. J. Le Conte took charge of the provisions, etc., contributed by Liberty County to the people of Boston, and sent them by ship in 1775 and 1776.
He married Jane Sloane, of New York, and the issue of the marriage was three sons - William, Louis, and John Eatton, Jr. William died without issue, in Liberty, in the house that was afterward burned; Louis was the father of Professors John and Joseph Le Conte; and John Eatton, Jr., the third son, was the father of John L. Le Conte, of Philadelphia, the distinguished entomologist.
Louis, the father of the writer, was born in Shrewsbury, N. J., on August 4, 1782. He was
educated in New York, graduating at Columbia College in 1799, when he was but seventeen. He studied medicine under Dr. Hosack, and attained great knowledge and skill in that profession. He was called "doctor," but I think never graduated as such, his only object in studying medicine apparently being to practise it on his own plantation.
John Eatton, Jr., remained in New York and became a captain, and later major, in the corps of topographical engineers of the United States army; but Louis, some twelve years before the death of his father, in 1810, when he was twenty-eight, moved South and assumed the management of the property in Georgia.
Louis Le Conte was so remarkable a man and his influence on the writer was so great that it is necessary to dwell on his character and the plantation life in Liberty.
The community of Liberty County was a peculiar one. It was a colony of English Puritans, who settled first in Dorchester, Mass., then moved to Dorchester, S. C., and then, about 1750, to Liberty County. A Dorchester was founded here also, but it was of little importance. As might be supposed from their origin, these settlers were characterized equally by a
rigid orthodoxy and a love of liberty. The name Liberty County was given in recognition of the fact that the flag of independence was there first raised in Georgia. It was characterized also as the most moral and religious, as well as the most intelligent, community in Georgia. The people were, however, very clannish and exclusive. My father, of course, was an outsider, an interloper, not "one of the us"; and was therefore regarded askance for some time. Although there finally grew up on both sides the warmest feelings, although he finally secured the deepest affection and reverence of the whole community, yet he was of a different spirit and never completely affiliated with them: he was always somewhat of an outsider. In January, 1812, he married Ann Quarterman, a Puritan born in the county in 1792 and therefore "one of the us." The issue of this marriage was four sons and three daughters. One of the daughters died in infancy, but the other six children grew up to marry and have families of their own.
I was born on the plantation "Woodmanston," February 26, 1823, the fifth child and youngest son. My mother died of pneumonia in 1826, when I was but three years old. I can not remember at all either her face or any event
of her life. The one thing concerning her that I remember, the earliest event in the self-conscious history of my life, was connected with her death-bed. It was a bowl of blood standing on the bureau of her bedroom. Doubtless it deeply impressed me, and looking back now, it seems ominous. It probably was her death-warrant. My father always thought so, the blood having been drawn by the attending physicians against his judgment.
I can not remember my father and mother in their mutual relations, but my father must have loved his wife passionately. The horror of her death almost dethroned his reason, and out of the resulting gloom and mental paralysis he emerged only slowly and after many years. Although I could not then understand its cause, this feeling tinged all my early life with a mild sadness. I remember well his silent gloom. I remember well how he would snatch me up, strain me to his heart, smother me with passionate kisses, set me down quickly, rise and walk rapidly about the room, sit down, and again relapse into silence. Hence it was that I regarded him with reverence and passionate love, but also with awe and almost with fear. My mother was buried in Midway churchyard, eight miles from
the plantation house. Every Sunday after morning service and our cold lunch, he took one or two of us boys - I was always one - and walked in the cemetery to visit her grave. In tearless silence he leaned on the railing and gazed steadily fifteen or twenty minutes on the simple mound; then silently walked away, leading us by the hand. This he did every Sunday as long as he lived - for twelve years. It was during this period of gloom, when I was between three and four years old, that clear consciousness of self dawned on me.
As the years passed and my father began to take hold on life again, his children became more companions to him. The awe and fear of him diminished more and more, but the love and reverence increased to greater and greater passionateness. But his paroxysms of gloom never entirely disappeared until his two eldest children, William and Jane, married and had children of their own. His joy in his grandchildren was boundless; it was a rejuvenation to him.
In the early part of his lonely life, in order to divert his thoughts from his grief, he fitted up several rooms in the attic, especially one large one, as a chemical laboratory. Day after
day, and sometimes all day, when not too much busied in the administration of his large plantation, he occupied himself with experimenting there. I remember vividly how, when permitted to be present, we boys followed him about silently and on tiptoe; how we would watch the mysterious experiments; with what awe his furnaces and chauffers, his sand-baths, matrasses, and alembics, and his precipitations filled us. Although these experiments were undertaken in the first instance to divert his mind from his sorrow, yet his profound knowledge of chemistry, his deep interest and persistence, certainly eventuated in important discoveries. Thus diversion gradually ripened into intellectual delight.
It was during this time that he fell into a low state of health without any assignable cause. After some time he determined to try vegetarianism, and for two years he absolutely avoided flesh in any form. Feeling no effect, however, he returned to the moderate use of meat, and promptly recovered. His ill-health, I am sure, was brought on, not by any fumes of the laboratory, as he imagined, but from anguish for the loss of his wife.
My father always attended personally to his
place, on foot in winter, when living on the plantation, on horseback when the family was at the summer retreat, Jonesville, about three miles away. But during the period of his ill-health he was not able to attend to the duties of the plantation and about two hundred slaves, so for a year employed an overseer, the only one he ever had.
Always fond of nature and science in all departments, he now devoted himself more and more ardently to the making and cultivation of a botanical and floral garden. About an acre of ground was set apart for this purpose and much of his time, mornings and afternoons, was spent there, "Daddy Dick," a faithful and intelligent old negro being employed under his constant supervision in keeping it in order. This large garden was the pride of my father. Every day after his breakfast, he took his last cup of coffee - his second or third - in his hand, and walked about the garden, enjoying its beauty and neatness and giving minute directions for its care and improvement. His especial pride was four or five camellia-trees - I say trees, for even then they were a foot in diameter and fifteen feet high. I have seen the largest of these, a double white, with a thousand blossoms
open at once, each blossom four or five inches in diameter, snow-white and double to the center. In the vicinity of a large city such a tree would now be worth a fortune, but my father never thought - no one did then - of making any profit from his flowers; it was sufficient to enjoy their beauty.
This garden was the joy and delight of my childhood, and continued to be such through association, long after his death and after it had lost its beauty for want of his care. In 1896 I visited the old place again. It was a mere wilderness, but the old camellia-tree still stood covered with blossoms. I measured its girth; ten inches from the ground, where the great branches came off, it was fifty-six inches in circumference.
I have said that my father was devoted to science. His knowledge of botany and chemistry was really profound. His beautiful garden became celebrated all over the United States, and botanists from the North and from Europe came to visit it, always receiving welcome and entertainment, sometimes for weeks, at his house. On such occasions he would plan and execute long excursions in the Altamaha region for the purpose of collecting rare plants, the
places of which he well knew. These excursions often occupied several days, and he stayed at night at the cabins of the poor "crackers," all of whom delighted to entertain him and his friends. From these excursions he would return laden with treasures that he would help his botanical friends to pack and send off.
As the Altamaha region was a comparatively unexplored field, he discovered many new plants, but he gave them freely to his scientific friends. He loved nature and truth purely for the sake of nature and truth, and never thought of any personal advantage. I remember, moreover, that he entirely ignored the custom of the botanists of that time and anticipated the natural classification. He always preferred to speak of plants in connection with the natural rather than the Linnæan system. In speaking of a plant, he would give the Linnæan order, and then add, "But it belongs to a natural order of such a plant," giving the typical genus.
Although chemistry and botany were his chief love, he was almost equally acquainted with other departments of science, especially zoology, physics, and mathematics. We boys were passionately fond of gunning and fishing; stimulated by his example and precept, we
brought everything strange or remarkable to him to identify and name, which he easily did by the use of his scientific library, ample for that time. His delight and skill in mathematics were remarkable. I remember in particular his joy in working out mathematical puzzles, especially magic squares. When my brother William was in college, he sent my father several questions in mathematics that had proved too hard for the professor. He promptly solved them and sent back the results.
With such predominance of scientific tastes, it might be supposed that he was correspondingly deficient in the classics. But not so, for he was thoroughly acquainted with these also. He read Latin at sight almost as readily as he did English. Indeed I have never known any one who used Latin so nearly as a native would.
So much for the intellectual character of Louis Le Conte. But in moral character he was no less remarkable. Indeed the best qualities of character were constantly exercised and cultivated in the just, wise, and kindly management of his two hundred slaves. The negroes were strongly attached to him, and proud of calling him master. He cared not only for their physical but also for their moral and religious
welfare. Some of the most distinguished clergymen of that time, among whom I may mention Dr. Charles Colcock Jones, the distinguished Presbyterian, and the Rev. Mr. Law, the no less distinguished Baptist, devoted themselves in pure charity to missionary work among the negroes. They established religious organizations on every plantation, with their "Praise Houses" (houses of worship built by the planters) and negro preachers ordained by the missionary; and visited them regularly, going from plantation to plantation. As the services were conducted at night, the minister was entertained by the planter; and I remember frequent visits of this kind by Dr. Jones.
The planters found it necessary, however, to supplement these religious influences with more forcible methods of resistance. To prevent roaming and drunkenness, they formed themselves into a mounted police that regularly patrolled the county by night and arrested all who were without passes. Prohibition laws against the retail of spirits were enacted and strictly enforced. There never was a more orderly, nor apparently a happier, working class than the negroes of Liberty County as I knew them in my boyhood.
My father was active in all these methods of moral improvement and of moral restraint, but his deeply religious and actively sympathetic nature showed itself in other and far more unmistakable ways, especially in his personal charities among the poor "pine knockers" in the neighboring pine barrens of McIntosh County. These "pine knockers," or "crackers," were a degraded and absolutely unprogressive people. They lived in the most meager way by planting small patches of corn, potatoes, and cotton; and supplemented this means of livelihood by shooting deer, and often the cattle of their wealthier neighbors in Liberty County. They were a pale, cadaverous people from want of sufficient and proper food. My father, as has already been said, was educated as a physician, although he never practised medicine except on his own plantation and among these poor people. Knowing that they could not employ a physician, he never refused to respond to their calls for help, sometimes riding twenty miles, carrying his own food and staying over night in their miserable cabins. In several cases of chronic trouble in children, due to bad food, clothing, and housing, he took them to his own home, kept them for months, and sent them back
cured. For all this he never thought of receiving any return.
My mother, as already said, I can not remember. All that I know of her appearance is derived from a silhouette profile, said to be an excellent likeness. It showed a strong face, with high features and noble and refined character. A mother's love I never consciously knew. But on her death all a mother's love was transferred to my father, and he was henceforth both father and mother to his children. Yet who can say how much I owe to my mother; how much of character may be formed before three years of age, before the utmost limit of memory? Who can tell how much we receive by heredity? My mother was passionately fond of art, and especially of music; who can say how much her cradle songs may have impressed my innermost spiritual nature? My father's tastes, on the other hand, were mainly scientific. To this double inheritance, I suppose I owe my equal fondness for science and art.
"Woodmanston" was situated on Bulltown Swamp, the dividing line between Liberty and McIntosh Counties, the house itself being on a kind of knoll that became an island at high water. The situation was not healthy for
whites, and hence arose the necessity for summer retreats. In spite of the retreat the children all suffered more or less from malarial fevers, which were sometimes hard to break. Ill health in my case led to contemplative, reflective, introspective habits. From this cause or from natural tendency, I early became interested in philosophical subjects.
The community, I have said, was intensely
religious. My mother - "one of the us" - was
also deeply and genuinely pious. Although so
sympathetic, self-sacrificing, and in the truest
sense religious, my father was not pious in the
ordinary sense. Caring little for observances,
forms of doctrine, or church organizations, he
never "professed religion" or connected himself
with any church. Yet on his death I heard
the Rev. Dr. Axson say in the funeral sermon
that he never knew any one who in his life so
exemplified the principles of Christianity; that
in his opinion he was in the truest sense a
Christian. He was undoubtedly far ahead of
his time in his religious views, being liberal
without being skeptical. He was, however, reticent
on the subject, because he feared he would
be misunderstood. One concession he made to
his wife: about nine o'clock every night, before
the children were sent to bed, he read aloud a
chapter from the Bible. This he kept up to the
time of his death. I remember well the pride
and alacrity with which one of us boys, taking
turns, would bring the big family Bible and lay
it on the table before him.
Such were the influences under which my
own religious nature grew. Hence it was that
I was first orthodox of the orthodox; later, as
thought germinated and grew apace, I adopted
a liberal interpretation of orthodoxy; then,
gradually I became unorthodox; then in deep
sympathy with the most liberal movement of
Christian thought; and finally, to some extent,
a leader in that movement.
Of all the influences determining my character
and tastes, the personality of my father
was by far the most potent. Next in importance
to this, undoubtedly, was the freedom of my
boyhood life in a country abounding in game of
all sorts. This developed a passionate fondness
for nature in all departments and for field
sports of all kinds, with bow and arrow, with
gun, and with fishing-line. As I grew older this
love of nature took on higher forms; first in the
study of ornithology, and later in camping
trips, undertaken partly in the spirit of adventure
and partly for the geological study of
mountains.
I linger with especial delight on this early
plantation life, far from town and the busy hum
of men; a life that has passed forever. It will
live for a time in the memory of a few, and
then only in history. It was, indeed, a very
paradise for boys. My father never forbade us
the use of firearms, but merely counseled their
careful use. The result justified the wisdom of
his method. Four of us boys with guns on our
shoulders all the time, and yet never an accident!
Guns there were a plenty in the house -
guns of all kinds, rifles and shot-guns, single-barreled
guns and double-barreled guns, muskets
and sporting guns, big guns, little guns,
and medium-sized guns, long guns and short
guns. There was a complete armory of them
up-stairs in one of the closets, besides several
in the hands of the most trusty negro men to
shoot game and wild animals of prey and
crop-destroying birds. There must have been at
least twenty of them. How they came there
was first revealed to us by a garrulous old negro
man named Samson. The story as told by him,
and in all essentials afterward confirmed by my
father, was as follows:
My grandfather, John Eatton Le Conte, as
already stated, was accustomed to spend his
winters on his Georgia plantation and his summers
in New York. At this time - soon after
the War of the Revolution - the Indian country
was just over the Altamaha River, about fifteen
to twenty miles from the plantation. The intervening
country, now McIntosh County, was
pine barren and almost uninhabited. It was a
sort of neutral ground, a no-man's land. The
Indians had several times raided the rich plantations
of Liberty, and escaped again into the
Indian territory on the other side of the Altamaha.
Their success had emboldened them, and
as our plantation was on the south border of
Liberty it was peculiarly exposed.
My grandfather had prepared for attack by
building a stockade and fortifying it with old
revolutionary muskets, and had given directions
to the negroes to seek shelter there in case of
a raid. One day about noon, the negroes came
running toward the fort in great alarm, closely
pursued by the Indians to the very door. Most
of the negroes got in safely, but one powerful
negro man was seized by two Indians just at
the door. In the struggle, all fell together to
the ground, the negro beneath. My grandfather
fired a load of buckshot at the struggling mass;
the two Indians were instantly killed, but the
negro springing up entered the fort. He had
been grazed across the chest by a shot, but not
hurt. Then commenced a regular battle, lasting
two or three hours, the Indians, several hundreds,
fighting with their bows and arrows, and
the garrison with muskets. I wish I could give
in Samson's words a description of the battle -
how my grandfather with a few of the bravest
negroes, stood at the loopholes, fired, handed
back the empty muskets to be reloaded, took
loaded ones in their stead, and fired again. Finally,
the Indian chief, in his eagerness to encourage
his braves to storm the fort, unwarily
exposed himself, and was brought down with a
broken leg by a shot. The Indians immediately
made a bold dash, carried off their chief, took
horses from the stable, bound the chief on one of
them, and hastily fled, carrying their dead and
wounded with them. They did not go, however,
without booty. According to Samson's account,
three negro women and Samson himself were
captured before they could reach the fort, and
were carried away by the Indians in their flight.
The Liberty troop hearing of the raid, organized
and pursued, but, as they supposed, never
overtook them. Samson, however, told a different
story. According to him, they did overtake
the Indians, but these lay concealed and
watched the troop pass by, taking the precaution,
however, of grasping the throats of their
prostrate prisoners with one hand, while they
brandished a glittering knife with the other.
Samson was in the Indian territory for
three years, and then came back to the plantation
and was made one of the head men there.
He says the Indians treated their captives well,
quite as equals, especially the women, whom
they took as wives. These never came back, because
they had children to care for. Samson,
according to his own story, ran away several
times, and was recaptured; but finally succeeded
in getting back. In telling this story, which
he did very often, the old man would become
so excited that the foam would fly from his lips.
A short account of this raid is given in White's
Historical Collections of Georgia, but all the interesting
details given by Samson were unknown,
and are now given for the first time.
Concerning my education, the really best I
got was informal. First and most important of
all was the daily companionship of my father.
Next to this was the many mechanical operations
going on continually on the plantation;
and third, the unlimited freedom of the plantation
life far away from city ways, and directed
only by a wise father. Of the first of these, I
have already said enough. A few words now on
the two others.
In these early days, everything was done on
the plantation. There were tanneries in which
the hides of slaughtered cattle were made into
leather. There was a shoemaker's shop, where
from the leather made on the place the shoes
for all the negroes were made by negro shoemakers.
There were blacksmith and carpenter
shops, where all the work needed on the plantation
was done by negro blacksmiths and carpenters.
All the rice raised on the plantation
was thrashed, winnowed, and beaten by machinery
made on the spot, driven by horse-power,
and the horses by negro boys. All the
cotton was ginned and cleaned and packed
on the place. As the cotton was Sea Island,
or long-staple, Whitney's invention was of no
use, and only roller gins could be used, at
first, foot-gins, and later horse-gins. For the
same reason - viz., the fineness of the staple -
the cotton was all packed by hand and foot, the
packer standing in the suspended bag. All these
operations of tanning, shoemaking, blacksmithing,
carpentering, the thrashing, winnowing,
and beating of rice, and the ginning, cleaning,
and packing of cotton, were watched with intensest
interest by us boys, and often we gave
a helping hand ourselves. There was always
especial interest in the ginning of cotton by foot
and the thrashing of the rice by flail, because
these were carried on by great numbers working
together, the one by women, and the other
by men, and always with singing and shouting
and keeping time with the work. The negroes
themselves enjoyed it hugely.
Far away from any city as we were, whatever
we wanted we were compelled to make. If
we wanted marbles, we made them, and excellent
marbles they were. If we wanted kites, we
made them, and none better were ever made.
We, of course, wanted bows and arrows - we
therefore made them, as fine bows and as exquisitely
finished arrows as I have ever seen.
We had an ambition to have pistols; we made
them also, and here it may be interesting to
trace the evolution of the pistol as I observed
it myself. First, little lead cannons were cast
in a paper mold over a rod of wood. Then
these were mounted as lead pistols, touched off
by a sort of match-lock. This was as far as
most of us went; but one of my brothers, Lewis,
had remarkable mechanical talent. Not satisfied
with such crude results, he continued to improve
his firearms. First, he cast the lead on iron
gas tubes, drilled out to smooth bore. Then he
improved these by fitting to the gas tube a
breaching of iron, with chamber and touch-hole
drilled out, and casting lead over all; then he
enlarged the pistol to rifle size, adding lock,
spring, hammer, and nipple, all of which he
made himself; then he mounted this barrel on
a beautiful stock of bird's-eye maple, with
guard and trigger and grease-box complete, and
trimmed it with an alloy of lead, zinc, and antimony
of his own manufacture. The whole
was beautifully chased and engraved with tools
of his own making. The final result was as
beautiful a rifle as I ever saw, and as efficient
too. With this rifle I have seen him bring down
a squirrel from the top of a hundred-foot tree,
with a bullet through its brain.
This same brother when a boy twelve years
old made the most exquisite bows and arrows,
and I have known him to bring home to breakfast
eight or ten birds as the fruits of his wonderful
archery.
Still another, and most important part, of
this informal education was the free plantation
life with unlimited game and fish. As has been
said, if anything unusual was got, whether fish
or fowl or reptile or mammal or even insect,
we were sure to bring it home for father to
name. This kind of life is an admirable culture
for a boy. It not only contributes to physical
health but also to mental health, by continual
contact with nature and by cultivation of the
powers of observation. In addition, it cultivates
in an admirable way quick perception,
prompt decision, and persistent energy and patience
in pursuit. In the ardor of duck-hunting,
I have been compelled to creep on hands and
knees for hours to secure the quarry.
I know well that there is much to be said
against the destruction of life for sport. I felt
this myself, even as a boy. I well remember
that at the age of eleven, when I first began to
carry a gun, one of my earliest triumphs was
that of bringing down a gray squirrel from the
top of a tall tree. But my triumph was quickly
changed into keenest remorse when I saw it
convulsed and dying at my feet. Habit, excitement
of the chase, fulness
of physical health
and animal spirits, dulled, but never wholly
quenched, my keen sympathy with animal suffering.
I was taught by my father, and impelled
by my own nature, never to destroy life
for mere sport. Sport enough there was, but
always in accomplishing some ulterior and useful
purpose.
This was in boyhood; now, in my old age,
with decline of intense vitality, all the tenderness
of my sympathy with animal life returns
in full force. I can no longer take the least
pleasure in shooting or in seeing shooting, not
only because the pleasure of physical activity
is less, but also because my sympathy with all
life is more keen.
Many who may read the above will conclude
that I am an anti-vivisectionist. Not so. Undoubtedly
our sympathy with life ought to be
universal, and the more, the better. Yes, but it
ought to be in exact proportion to the grade of life.
I would, I ought to, destroy a thousand fleas for
the comfort of a faithful dog. So, also, I ought
to be willing to destroy a thousand dogs for the
health and well-being of man. Of course it
should be with the least suffering possible under
the circumstances. But remember, that
suffering, too, is in proportion to the grade of life.
It is not true that
The
poor beetle that we tread upon,
Other sports, less
objectionable, we had in
plenty. When I was about ten years old, the
three younger boys, John, Lewis, and I, undertook,
with the help of an intelligent and ingenious
negro man, Primus, and with the permission
of father to use Primus for this purpose,
to make a fine dugout canoe out of a large cypress
log three feet in diameter. We were several
months making it, but when finished, it was
a large and beautiful canoe. The amount of joy
we got out of that canoe was incalculable.
Whole days were spent in the exploration of
the great swamp on which the plantation was
situated. I am sure we felt, on a small scale, all
the joy and pride of discoverers of unknown
lands. During the times of high water by winter
freshets, the rice-fields, at that time bare of
rice, formed a splendid sheet of water two miles
long and half a mile wide. We sometimes
rigged a mast and sail, but as the canoe was not
suited to this kind of propulsion, we often suffered
shipwreck in water two or three feet deep.
But to a boy this only gave zest to the enjoyment.
Much of our duck-hunting was done in
this canoe, and I became very expert in the use
of the paddle and in the management of a canoe.
As might be supposed, in a warm climate
and by an abundance of water, swimming, too,
was a favorite sport. I very early learned to
swim. I was a good swimmer at ten; and in
early manhood, I never knew a better swimmer,
and but few equal to myself. Even now at
seventy-seven, my swimming is a marvel to the
onlooker. I do not at all exaggerate when I say
that to me swimming is still as easy, and I think
perhaps a little easier, than walking. The reason
is obvious. I am of slender frame, long
limbs, small bones, and large lungs. I can now
throw out more than three hundred cubic inches
of air. The specific gravity of my body is less
than that of water, even fresh water. I can,
therefore, lie motionless floating on the water,
breathing perfectly naturally, for any length of
time - I believe I could go to sleep. Of course
then the least exertion properly applied produces
easy and graceful locomotion.
During my boyhood there were on the plantation
three very old negroes who were native
Africans and remembered their African home.
They were Sessy, a little old man bent almost
double; Nancy, an old woman with filed teeth;
and Charlotte, who left Africa, according to her
own account, when she was about twelve. All
of them, of course, were superannuated and
taken care of without any remuneration. Sessy
was extravagantly fond of alligator meat, and
always begged us boys to bring him the tails
of any alligators we might kill. Small alligators,
six and seven feet long, abounded in the
swamp, and we never failed to shoot them
whenever we could, as they were great destroyers
of fish, and, although we cared little for
them, interfered somewhat with our swimming.
Now and then longer and more dangerous ones
appeared; the largest we ever killed was fourteen
feet long. This one was drawn out of his
hole during low water in the swamp, by a hook
attached to a long pole, and about twenty-five
negro men ahold of the pole. It was great
sport, and I often afterward told the story to
my children.
There was also on a neighboring plantation
an old native African named Philip, who was a
very intelligent man. He used to tell us all
about the customs and religion of the country
from which he came. He was not a pagan, but
a Mohammedan. He greatly interested us by
going through all the prayers and prostrations
of his native country. He also gave us the numerals
up to twenty; these were, of course, native
African, not Arabic. They were: go, dede,
tata, nigh, ja, ja go, ja ded, ja tata, ja nigh,
suppe, suppa go, suppa dede, suppa tata, suppa
nigh, suppa ja, suppa ja go, suppa ja dede,
suppa ja tata, suppa ja nigh. It is seen that
they counted by fives and not by tens, as we do.
As to formal education, all the schooling I
got was in a neighborhood country school, of
all grades and both sexes, supported by four or
five families, and of the most desultory kind.
During nine years of schooling, I had just nine
different teachers. Only one of them had any
special influence on me, and that was Alexander
H. Stephens, who afterward, as Governor of the
State, as Representative in Congress, and as
Vice-President of the Confederate States, received
every honor that his State could confer
on him. A poor boy, he received his collegiate
education by the charity of a church
society of women. He commenced life as a
teacher, and for two years I had the privilege
of being his pupil. His appearance at that
time lives in my memory. He used to join
with us in our ball-playing. I see him now in
his shirt-sleeves, bat in hand, with his tall,
slender form, frail and thin to painful meagerness,
and his pale, corpse-like face. How he
would laugh and shake his gaunt sides when
he made a good strike, and still more when we
beat him! One thing about him is especially
worthy of mention as influencing his pupils for
good, his utter detestation of lying, deceit, and
meanness of every kind. He never encouraged
tale-bearing, but always openly reproved it. I
remember that once my brother Lewis thrashed
a boy of his own size severely, and was caught
in the act by the teacher. Both boys were, of
course, brought up for trial; but when my
brother told the reason why he beat the other
boy, viz., that he had called him a liar, Stephens
promptly dismissed the case, with the remark
that Lewis was perfectly right. Thus he cultivated
in his scholars the sense of self-respect
and honor; in our case only emphasizing the
influence which we got at home.
Since those early days, I have frequently
met Mr. Stephens, sometimes in Georgia, sometimes
in South Carolina, and sometimes in
Washington, and in all these places, both before
and after the war between the States, I never
met him but he referred with pleasure to the
school days in Liberty. He had the most profound
admiration for my father. Indeed my
father's personality was a revelation to him.
He had never seen nor conceived of anything
like it before. He always said that association
with him had profoundly influenced his own
character and career.
The school course in those days was extremely
simple. Beyond the "three R's," it
was simply Greek, through Xenophon; Latin
through Livy; and mathematics, through algebra
and geometry. I took pleasure in all these,
but especially in the mathematics. The schoolhouse
(a mere rough board shanty, put up by
the planters interested) was small, and consisted
of but one room. The big boys, those of
twelve years and upward, were allowed in
pleasant weather to study out of doors, under
the trees or in the broom-grass, according to
the temperature. Study, therefore, was wholly
without oversight, but I think none the less
faithful on that account. Education being along
few lines, advanced rapidly, and I was already
well prepared for the freshman class of college
at fourteen years. But my father thought that
I was too young to leave home; so I spent another
year in reviewing all my Latin, Greek,
and mathematics, and entered college at fifteen.
The different plantations interested in the
school were far apart, the extremes being at least
three miles. We boys and one sister had to
walk about a mile and a half. We took with us
a cold dinner in a tin bucket, therefore; and a
negro boy always accompanied us to carry the
bucket, and to wait on us at school, if necessary.
The negro boy always considered it a great
honor to be selected from among the five or six
about the yard, whose business it was to cut up
wood for the house and the kitchen and to wait
on the cook. This attendance of a servant at
school was considered by the other scholars as a
rather "swell" proceeding, and our family was
unique in this regard. There was really little
or no service rendered, however, the boy being
rather a companion in our sports, and usually
a great favorite with all the scholars. School
continued from nine in the morning to four in
the afternoon, with an interval of an hour at
noon for lunch and games. In the long days of
May, just before moving to the summer retreat,
Jonesville, we boys would hurry home, in order
to enjoy a little gunning or fishing or swimming
before supper.
I might give many details of these school
days in Liberty that it seems to me could be
made as interesting as Mr. Hughes's account of
Tom Brown's school-days at Rugby. I will
give only one incident, showing the moral tone
of the school. It was supported mainly by
three families, the Le Contes, the Joneses, and
the Varnedoes; but a gentleman living at Riceboro,
about a mile distant, asked the privilege
of sending his boy, Rush, to it. Rush
was a handsome, bright boy of about twelve, in
dress almost a dandy in comparison with the
rest of us. He had been at other schools, where
he had learned some bad words and ways. At
first he was on his good behavior, and we all
liked him, but gradually he began to use bad
language in the presence of the girls. Finally,
they determined to punish him. The boys entered
into the conspiracy so far as to agree to
throw him down on his face, and then to deliver
him over to the girls. After we had thrown
him, a very strong and heavy girl laid her
weight across his shoulders, and my sister
Anne laid the switch on him well, until in the
struggle, he got hold of the hand of the girl lying
across his shoulders and bit it severely, and
it all ended in a good cry on both sides. But
it cured Rush effectually of his bad habits, and
he became a great favorite. Soon after this
the school broke up, to reassemble at Jonesville,
and we saw no more of Rush. This was about
1835. In 1863, eighteen years afterward, when
Rush was a graduate of West Point and a lieutenant
in the Confederate army, my sister met
him again, and they talked of the occurrence,
he, of course, bringing up the subject. On this
occasion he showed his manliness by acknowledging
his fault, and thanking her for the punishment.
It taught him a lesson, he said, that
he had never forgotten.
I finished my schooling in December, 1837,
and was ready to go to college. Up to that time
Lewis and I had never been farther from the
plantation home than Midway church, eight
miles. Up to that time we had never worn any
other than boy's clothes - i. e., round jacket,
limp, open collar, soft cap, and often even bare
feet. Now we had to put on the toga virilis:
swallow-tailed coat, stiff stock, and beaver hat. It
is easy to imagine how queer we looked, and
how awkward we felt when we put them on the
first time to go to church. We could not look
at one another without bursting out with laughter.
In these days the change is gradual, but
then it was as sudden and complete as the
metamorphosis of a chrysalis to a butterfly.
On the ninth day of January, 1838, the very
day set for us to leave for college, my father
died, after a short illness from blood-poisoning,
and in the prime of life, being but fifty-five
years and five months old. This delayed our
departure a week.
The death of my father simply stunned me
- I was dazed; I could not realize it. I remember
well that as a child I sometimes lay awake
at night thinking of death, not so much of my
own as of that of those I loved. It seemed to
me that I might possibly be able to bear that
of brother or sister, but my father's possible
death filled me with terror. I simply shut it
out of my mind as a thing I could not, I must
not, think about. And now the thing I most
dreaded had come to pass. He died about four
in the afternoon. All the next day I wandered
alone in the beautiful, beloved garden in a state
of stupor, of mental paralysis. He was buried
in Midway churchyard by the side of the wife
he loved so devotedly. I have already alluded
to the sermon preached by the Rev. Dr. Axson
and the tribute to his character.
We took stage from Savannah to Augusta,
one hundred and twenty miles. There was but
one passenger besides ourselves, a well-dressed,
courteous, educated gentleman, returning home
from a visit to Savannah. He had a bottle of
brandy along, which he too often used. He was
evidently very drunk, and became more and
more maudlin as we went on. He talked incessantly
of his wife, and of how good a woman
she was - much too good for him; and as he
approached his house, began to shed tears.
Finally, about a mile from his destination, he
declared he could not go home; he could not
bear that his wife should see him in his present
condition. He stopped the stage, bade us good-by
with many warnings against the vice that
had enslaved him, and got off at a wayside inn.
I mention this only to say how it affected
me; instead of amusing me, as it might some,
it made me inexpressibly sad. I had never seen
a drunken white man before. I had seen two
or three drunken negroes, and had associated
drunkenness with the lowest characters, so to
see a respectable man debase himself thus was
to me awfully tragic.
Another incident may be worth mention. As
we approached Athens, belated students began
to drop into the stage. Belated students are
not apt to be good students; some of these were
among the worst elements in college. Seeing at
a glance that we, Lewis and I, were "greenhorns,"
they took delight in astonishing us with
ribald jests and obscene songs. I was not at
all amused, but simply disgusted. I may add
here, that for me the so-called dangers of college
life never existed. I saw much of vicious
conduct among students, of course, but whether
such example injures or not, depends entirely
upon inheritance and early training. For myself,
I never felt the least temptation to join
in vicious courses, nor have I ever been enticed
by others to join in such courses. College students
are not so bad as some seem to think.
They never deliberately try to lead any one
astray. They simply seek congenial association.
Indeed I believe that college is the safest
of all places for young men. It is impossible
always to remain in the bomb-proof of home.
One must go out into the world and fight the
battle of life. Now, college young men are a
picked set, far better and safer than the average.
I repeat, therefore, that I had no temptations
in college worth speaking of. In fact,
from early training, and especially perhaps
from an instinct of possible danger, I avoided
many things then which I afterward freely
practised. For example, during my whole college
course I never touched a card, but I have
used them ever since in my family as an innocent
source of amusement. Again, during my
whole college course I never touched intoxicating
drinks of any kind. Now I use wine on my
table every day, and never forbid it to my children
if they desire it. Instead of sowing any
wild oats and reforming afterward, I have
steadily become more and more liberal in my
thoughts and feelings about such things. This
is, I believe, as it ought to be. Vice is mere
weakness; evil consists in mere abuse; but in
early life strength is not yet acquired. Rational
use is not easy, and therefore had better not be
attempted, except under the shelter of the home
roof.
Brought up in the country and never having
wandered farther than eight miles from the
family hearthstone, when I arrived at college
my thoughts reverted with force to the old
home and its surroundings, and for several
months I suffered severely from nostalgia.
My yearning for the old plantation and the
beautiful garden was intense. It was during
this time that I received letters from my eldest
brother William that distressed me beyond
measure. One of the noblest of men, since
my father's death he had been my guardian,
in loco parentis, and was very dear to me. He
was a thoroughly religious man, and, of course,
of the old orthodox type. He felt deeply the
duty of improving the sad occasion of my father's
death to urge upon me the absolute necessity
of "fleeing from the wrath to come," and
now! now! He alluded with distress and
doubt to my father's dying outside the pale
of the church. I have one letter yet. It distressed
me greatly then; it distresses me to read
it now, but for very different reasons; then, because
it brought vividly before me the dread
hereafter; now, because of the mistaken narrowness
of a good man. I appreciate the intense
affection, but recognize now the mistaken method.
The affection was all his own; the mistaken
method belonged to the time, not the man. My
brother was one of the strongest, most practical,
most rational and level-headed men I ever knew.
During a religious revival in the churches,
when I was in the junior class, Lewis and I,
with a large number of other students, joined
the church. Our church at Midway, Liberty
County, was Puritan-Congregationalist. There
was no church of that kind at Athens. The
nearest to it in faith was the Presbyterian. My
friends did not think it well to wait until we returned
to Liberty; the Presbyterian was good
enough. Thus it was that I became a Presbyterian
instead of a Congregationalist. Indeed
the history of our family was peculiar in this
regard. My ancestors were, of course, Huguenots
by blood and faith. In early colonial times,
the Huguenot church in New York became at
one time so weak financially, that it was compelled
to save itself from extinction by putting
itself under the protection of the English Colonial
Government, and became Episcopal. It so
remained ever after in New York. The old
Huguenot church, in which are registered the
births, deaths, and marriages of my ancestors
back to the original Guillaume, the "Église de
St. Esprit," is still a French Episcopal church.
On coming to Georgia, where there was no Episcopal
church, my father attended regularly the
Congregational church at Midway, of which my
mother was a member, and of which my elder
brother and sister also became members. My
father never connected himself with the church,
although all the children were baptized there.
Circumstances, already mentioned, connected
Lewis and me with the Presbyterian. It is not
strange, then, that with such a family history
I care little for denominational differences. Of
my own children, one is a Presbyterian, two
are Episcopalians, and one not a member of
any church, and that one is as good, for all I
can see, as any of them.
This revival, and my union with the church,
was undoubtedly a very great crisis in my life.
If there ever was a case of sudden, almost miraculous
conversion, mine was one. I passed
through all the stages described in such cases -
a period of great distress, of earnest prayer, of
exercise of faith, followed by a sudden sense of
acceptance, an intense ecstatic joy for deliverance,
and a trust in and love of the Deliverer.
The sense of the fatherhood of God and the
brotherhood of man was vivid and full of delight.
Life took on a new and glorious significance.
All men became dearer to me, and even
nature assumed a new and more beautiful appearance.
Literally there was a new heaven and
a new earth. The sky was never before so blue,
the clouds so grandly massy and white, the
grass so freshly green, nor the stars so bright.
The sense of joy was so great that my heart
seemed to swell almost to bursting.
But the real permanent change was a sense
of deliverance from the bondage of the fear of
death and the hereafter, which, under the spell
of the old orthodoxy, had always, in thoughtful
moments, oppressed me. My spirit was set
free. I was now the child of God and the brother
of Jesus. I had now a really noble object in
life, an ideal to be sought, an evil to be fought
against. This I have never lost. It has been
the most powerful element in the formation of
character and the determination of conduct.
However much I may have changed my opinion
as to the miraculousness of the process, this
change of relation toward the spiritual world
has remained as an eternal heritage. Delusion!
some will say. No, it was the old fear that was
the delusion. The change was not the establishing
of a new relation, but the discovery of the
true relation which existed.
After my connection with the church and
during my winter vacations of two and a half
months, my brother William often talked to me
very earnestly of my possible duty, "if I felt
called," to become a minister of the Gospel. Indeed
many of my friends to this day think that
I have missed my calling, that I ought to have
been a preacher. At that time I did think very
seriously of it, but my scientific tastes prevailed,
and carried me toward medicine instead; and I
have never regretted it. One may be a preacher
of righteousness in more ways than one.
Among the educating influences of college
life, I must not omit the literary societies. Fraternities,
such as now exist, there were none at
that time, but only semi-secret societies for literary
exercises and for debates. There were,
of course, two rival societies, called respectively
"Demosthenian" and "Phi Kappa," to one or
the other of which all the students belonged. I
was a Phi Kappa. I have seen nothing in colleges
since that time at all equal to these. The
interest in them was so great that Saturday, a
holiday in college exercises, was often entirely
consumed in debates; and when the question was
a living one, I have known the debates to continue
until midnight. They were an excellent
training for public life, and were therefore encouraged
by the faculty and stimulated by allowing
the two societies to choose one-half of the
eight junior orators, i. e., two by each society,
for commencement exhibition. The best results
of these societies I never attained. I was too
young and sensitive, too easily embarrassed to
make a good debater. Even to this day I am
not a ready speaker, although I have spoken so
much; even now I must elaborately prepare.
My brother Lewis, on the contrary, though far
less distinguished in the classes, was a very
fearless and successful debater.
Games and gymnasiums as a regular part
of college work, and hence regular organizations
of students for athletics, were unknown
at that time. Athletics and games there were
indeed a plenty, but as purely spontaneous expressions
of abounding vitality. I was light,
active, and fleet of foot, and became very expert
in gymnastics and as a player of town-ball, for
baseball and cricket had not yet evolved.
To me, at this time, a most important means
of culture was the society of ladies. The ladies
of Athens were celebrated for their beauty and
refinement, and it was the habit of the students
to cultivate the acquaintance of the ladies of the
families of the faculty and of other families in
the town. Refined women were to me then, and
I confess to something of the same feeling yet,
a sort of superior beings, belonging to another,
higher, and purer sphere of existence. I simply
worshiped them. Association with them
produced in me a delicious delirium, an ecstatic
joy and exaltation. I have much of the same
feeling yet, although moderated and purged of
its extravagance by experience. In these days
it has become the fashion to ridicule this romantic
feeling toward women, but there can be
no doubt it is the greatest of all safeguards of
the purity of young men.
I never had any great ambition to excel my
fellows in the classes. I was, moreover, too
young to appreciate the highest motives of
study. There were, therefore, only two motives
that determined such diligence as I showed
- viz., a desire to please my instructors and a
real taste in the subject of study. This latter
was the main motive in mathematics, mechanics,
and physics, and, in the last year, in mental and
moral philosophy. The subjects of my addresses
as junior orator in 1840, and again as
senior orator in 1841, on the occasion of my
graduation, of which I remember little except
their extreme immaturity, show this double tendency
of my mind toward science and moral
philosophy. The title of the one was True
Greatness, which I took to be mainly moral
worth; of the other, Love of Truth, the Highest
Incentive to Effort. Both of these I burned
many years ago in disgust at their almost childish
crudity and immaturity. I wish now I had
preserved them. We grow more tolerant as we
grow older. The fact is, my ability to write
anything of any value came very late. I never
was, and am not now, a facile writer. For me,
a written production of any kind is literally a
piece of thought work. It is not, however, a
manufactured article, but a child of the brain.
It is not made, but born - born of much labor
and with many throes. Of course, therefore, I
never could write until I had independent
thoughts of my own. The skilful putting together
of the commonplaces of literature into a
brilliant patchwork is a thing I could never do.
The natural history sciences, which the example
of my father had made my first love, were
almost wholly neglected during my college
course, because this side of science was the most
feebly represented in the faculty. I only returned
to it through the study of medicine, much
later.
There was but one man in the faculty who
was in any way remarkable, and whose personality
strongly impressed me - viz., Charles F.
McCay. He was an excellent mathematician
and mechanician, and well versed also in physics.
He was the most skilful oral examiner I
ever knew: his Socratic method of drawing
out knowledge or of exposing ignorance was
really marvelous; I have never known anything
like it. I was afterward, from 1853 to 1857, associated
with him as colleague, and became very
intimately acquainted with him, and learned to
admire him.
My college life was uneventful. I was, indeed,
full of life and spirit, and enjoyed my
college days to the full; but I have no college
pranks to relate. I had little fancy for such,
because I did not regard them as indicative of
spirit and courage. One single incident I mention.
It was my last year in college. I was preparing
for my part in the commencement exercises,
although I was then only eighteen - a mere
slender slip of a boy. My brother Lewis, then
twenty, was in love with a young lady, the one
he afterward married. A young man, P-, was
also in love with the same girl. One evening
about 9 P. M., Lewis and I were passing the college
dormitory, each with a lady on his arm;
Lewis, of course, with his lady-love. While passing,
I heard some noise in the building, but took
no notice of it. Lewis's jealous ear, however, detected
some taunt, which he regarded as an insult
to the ladies, and he recognized the window
from which it came. He said nothing to any
one, not even to me, about it, but next morning
accused P- of the insult, and instantly attacked
him. P- was a powerful man, and
gave Lewis a pretty severe pommeling.
I was away at the time, like Demosthenes
practising my speech in solitude. When I came
back I found Lewis with his eye bandaged, and
bathing it with a cooling lotion; and then for
the first time learned the facts. I determined at
once that I too would fight. I was perfectly
sure that I would be badly beaten; but no matter,
it had to be done. I went to P-'s room,
but he was absent. I waited for him in the
room of a friend just opposite, across the passage,
but said nothing to the friend. When
P- returned, I knocked at his door and entered.
As soon as I opened the door, he advanced
rapidly toward me. I fully expected to
be knocked down; but to my surprise P-
said that he was glad that I had come, for he
wished to apologize; that he had intended to
apologize to Lewis, but he had attacked him so
suddenly and violently that he had had no time.
He confessed that he was heartily ashamed of
himself. I was intensely relieved, although I
did not tell him so. On the contrary, I gave him
a piece of my mind, which to his credit he took
with great meekness.
The long winter vacations of two and a half
months we always spent on the plantation or
else at Cedar Hill, my brother's place. I enjoyed
these vacations immensely, renewing all
the sports of my boyhood, hunting, fishing,
boating, etc. It was in my last year at college,
immediately after returning from my last vacation,
that I heard by letter of the death of my
brother William, on the twenty-fifth day of
January, 1841, just three weeks after I had left
him. This was the second great affliction I had
suffered by death. My brother was my guardian,
and a very noble man whom I loved dearly.
He had been in bad health for some months.
Liberty County was very malarious; and in
spite of the summer retreats, the planters suffered
more or less from fevers. The summer of
1840 had been more than usually sickly, and
when I came down in November, I found William
in a very bad condition. He was well
aware of the uncertainty of his life, and often
talked to me calmly and even cheerfully of the
probability of his early death, for he was then
but twenty-eight. The only thing that distressed
him, he said, was leaving his wife and
children. These talks deeply impressed me at
the time, but I could not fully realize their significance,
because he was cheerful and his
strength was still considerable. Only a few days
before I left for college he took a walk of three
miles with me without fatigue. The news of
his death came, therefore, as a terrible shock
from which I recovered but slowly. But youth,
absence from the scene of grief, diversion of
constant duties of study - under these conditions
sorrow can not last very long. But the
happy vacations at Cedar Hill, the home of my
brother, and with my sister in the old plantation
house! Should I ever know such things
again?
I have spoken all along of my scientific
tastes inherited from my father, and enforced
by his example, but have said nothing of the
development of the esthetic side of my nature.
As already said, my mother was passionately
fond of music. How much I inherited from her,
I know not; but from early childhood my delight
in music was simply inconceivable. My
brother William, himself a flutist, observing
this, bought me a fife, on which I practised incessantly;
but lest it should annoy others, I
practised alone, and usually in the beloved garden.
In a year or two I became an excellent
performer. I remember well that a neighbor,
whose taste, however, was not cultivated, used
to say, that in his opinion, even in my best days
of flute-playing, I never made as good music as
I did in boyhood on the fife. After a few years
my brother bought me a flute, on which I played
much and quite skilfully all the time I was in
college and afterward, until I went to study
medicine in New York.
In New York I bought me a fine eight-keyed
flute, which I continued to use until I was nearly
fifty, when I quit playing altogether. Although
this is anticipating, I may say that my enjoyment
of my own flute music in early manhood
was intense, especially when playing entirely
alone. I never had, nor cared to have, the brilliant
execution of some, but for sweetness of
tone and passionate depth of feeling, I think I
was seldom excelled. I kept up my music many,
very many years after my marriage, especially
as an accompaniment to my wife's piano and
songs, but gradually played less and less, until
finally I dropped it entirely, when I was about
forty-eight. There were several reasons for
this. My taste in music was going ever forward,
while my power of performance, for want
of time to practise, was going ever backward,
until they were so far separated that I could no
longer please myself, and dropped it in disgust.
In early life, moreover, my greatest passion was
for simple melody, of which the flute is an admirable
expression; but as I grew older I more
and more enjoyed complex harmony, which, of
course, can not be rendered on the flute. I
enjoyed my wife's piano more than I did my
flute, and took more delight in listening than
in performing.
My love of poetry was far less advanced.
The first beginning of it was while in college,
and strange to say, showed itself in regard for
two poets as wide apart as possible - Milton
and Burns. My musical taste drew me toward
Milton, my love of nature toward Burns; but
my real fondness for literature and art came
much later, as I shall describe in the proper
place.
Lewis and I graduated in August, 1841. I
was eighteen and five months, and Lewis a little
more than two years older. It so happened that
my sister Anne, two years younger than I, graduated
from the Macon Female College, the first
female collegiate institution in the United
States, about the same time. It was arranged
(Anne's idea entirely) that we three should
make a tour through the Northern States, visiting
all the great cities. Anne joined us in
Athens, and we started at once.
This tour was a great event for all of
us. We went first to the national capital,
Washington, and put up at the best hotel. Anne
was determined to go in style. Now, Lewis and
I would, of course, have taken our meals at the
table d'hôte like other plain people, but Anne
wouldn't hear to it. It was much grander to
have a private parlor, and take our meals there.
I think, also, that with woman's keener instinct,
she was sensitive about our exceeding greenness;
for after several weeks of travel, we gave
up this expensive habit.
To our inexperience, the Capitol, the presidential
mansion, the buildings of the several Departments,
the Washington monument, not then
finished, etc., were wonders of architectural
magnificence. We attended, of course, the
meetings of Congress, and not only saw the
celebrated trio, Webster, Calhoun, and Clay,
but heard them speak. We also visited Mount
Vernon, the home of Washington. After a week
at the capital, we continued our journey, staying
a few days at Baltimore, Philadelphia, Boston,
and Cambridge, visiting, of course, everything
that was most worth seeing; and returned to
New York to spend a month or more there. My
sister Jane, and her husband, Dr. Harden, and
their two children, were also on a visit to New
York. My brother John had graduated as Doctor
of Medicine, in April, and had just married
Eleanor Josephine Graham, the most beautiful
woman I have ever seen. He and his beautiful
bride were still in New York, waiting to go
South in November. Our whole family, therefore,
except my brother William's widow and
her children, were here gathered in New York.
My uncle, John Eatton Le Conte, the distinguished
naturalist, with his afterward still
more distinguished son, John Lawrence Le
Conte, then only sixteen, was living at that time
at 46 Walker Street, New York; and John and
his bride stayed with him, while the rest of us
boarded near by. All of us spent every evening
at "Uncle Jack's" house, and a very happy six
weeks we passed under these delightful conditions.
Early in November we took regretful leave
of our dear old uncle and went South, and for
some weeks all of us stayed with my sister Jane
at the old plantation, Woodmanston.
About a week after our return my brother
William's widow came down from Macon, and
brought with her her brother, John T. Nisbet, a
young man of my own age. We became fast
friends and were soon inseparable. There were
at least a dozen houses in Liberty where I was
welcome to stay as long as I liked - the longer
the better - and "John T." always went with
me. We had grand times that winter, duck-shooting,
deer-hunting, riding on horseback with
the ladies, etc.
In the spring all of us went to Macon and
remained some weeks. In June John and his
wife, Lewis, and I went to Athens and organized
a trip for the mountains. There were eight
in the party, four of us and four of the Nisbets,
and we filled two carriages. Our route was
from Athens to Gainesville, Nacooche Valley,
Yonah Mountain, Clarkesville, Tallulah Falls,
Toccoa Falls, and back to Athens. I had previously
been over the ground during a college
vacation, but enjoyed it more in the gay company.
But, as will be seen, I enjoyed it still
more in later excursions.
On our return to Athens the party broke up
and scattered, John going to New York with his
wife, Lewis to Cambridge to attend the Harvard
Law School, and I to Macon to begin the study
of medicine under Dr. Charles West. Here,
save for a few weeks at Columbus and Merriwether
Springs in August, I remained until I
went down to the plantation for the winter in
November.
My brother John having settled at Savannah
and commenced the practise of medicine, I nominally
continued my studies under him. But
precious little study I did that winter! My
cousin John L. Le Conte, then eighteen, came
South and spent several months with me at the
old homestead. We had a delightful winter,
riding, boating, duck-shooting, etc. But John
never became really expert at any of these as
he had begun too late.
While John was with us, I think in April,
the great comet of 1843 appeared flaming in the
sky. With the single exception of that of 1858,
this was the largest comet I ever saw. The tail
was like the path of a great search-light, reaching
from the horizon to the zenith. As I was
always a lover of the starry dome, this wonderful
straight band flaming in the sky interested
me profoundly.
After John had left us, in June, I rode with
a companion to the Altamaha River and back, a
distance of thirty miles, to gather the plants and
river shells for which the region is so celebrated.
To escape the heat of the day and to have as
much time as possible at the gathering ground,
we started before sunrise. I can never forget
the delight of that early morning ride. The
cool, moist morning air was loaded with the
fragrance of the Magnolia glauca, which as we
neared a swamp could be smelt a mile away.
As we approached the Altamaha, the ponds were
covered with the broad leaves and the beautiful
yellow blossoms of the Nelumbium, which I had
never seen before. In addition to plants we
gathered a great number of river shells, especially
of the Maio spinosus, with its needle-like
spines an inch and a half long, a shell that is
found nowhere else in the world.
During the winter my sister Anne became
engaged to Dr. J. P. Stevens, a very worthy and
cultivated man and a successful physician in
Liberty County. In June, 1843, they were married,
and as Anne wanted to have a grand wedding,
on the shortest possible notice of four
days I went into Savannah and ordered everything -
cakes, fruits in abundance, about a ton
of ice - and got it all to Jonesville on the day of
the wedding. I had invited "John T." to come
down, and he also arrived the same day. I was
up all that night; for after the wedding I went
out serenading all the girls of Jonesville and
the visitors at the wedding, and got back to my
bed at the family home in Jonesville just as the
sun was rising.
"John T." took me back with him to Macon,
and then over to Midway, to the home of his
elder brother, Mr. Alfred Nisbet. Here for the
first time I met a young girl of fifteen, Miss
Caroline Elizabeth Nisbet, who later became
my wife. Ah, the boundless hospitality of
those times! Alfred Nisbet and his wife and
family of five children, all nearly grown, lived
really bountifully on his salary of two thousand
dollars a year, and entertained five of us with no
thought of limiting our stay. We had a continual
round of entertainments, musicales, and
evening parties, at which all the young people
of the village were present. The center of all
this gaiety was the bright-eyed, winsome Miss
Bessie. But I remained heart-whole. She was
only fifteen, and from the advanced age of
twenty I never thought of her except as a child.
Lewis returned from Harvard in June, and
immediately after married Miss Bessie's cousin,
Miss Harriet Nisbet, of Athens. My sister and
I went to Athens to attend the wedding and remained
for a week or so afterward at the hotel.
The landlord's daughter was a sweet-looking
girl with gentle, winning manners, and beautiful
blonde complexion. She played finely on
the harp, an instrument that, as she evidently
knew, was well adapted to show off the graceful
movements of her exquisitely molded arms and
soft little hands. Every evening I asked her to
play; and I must confess that those beautiful
arms and graceful fingers, those golden ringlets
and sapphire blue eyes did make some impression
on my too susceptible heart - the very first
that I had ever felt. The evenings were becoming
dangerously delightful, when, fortunately
for me, it became necessary for me to leave, as I
had to begin my medical studies in New York.
I was sad and melancholy for a long time afterward;
I went to Macon, but I did not get over
it; I went down to Liberty for a few weeks but
still I did not get over it, though the girls made
much of me and kept me going all the time; I
went on to New York and stayed with good old
"Uncle Jack," and still it was some time before
I could feel wholly free again.
But ere long I was to learn that it was not
real love.
I took advantage of every opportunity
offered, attending the hospitals on the occasions
of operations, joining the quiz class when there
was one, and taking a coach, Dr. Lewis Sayre,
then a very promising young surgeon. I also
took charity patients and thus had a little practise,
under the advice, when necessary, of the
professors. Of course I took dissection, and
found it strangely fascinating, the very horror
of the thing adding greatly to the fascination.
Such was my work all winter and spring, a
regular cram; monotonous enough, but yet interesting
to me, especially the more scientific
part of the curriculum, such as physiology,
anatomy, pathology, and chemistry. As most
of the students were imperfectly educated, the
fact that I was a Bachelor of Arts was a fine
plume in my cap.
The summer of 1844 was an eventful one for
me, and I believe of great importance in my
development. About the middle of May, when
we were through with our spring courses, my
cousin, John Lawrence Le Conte, and I started
on a summer trip westward. We knew not and
cared little where we would fetch up, being intent
only on having a good time. If we had
known our course, we certainly would have carried
a very different kind of luggage, for we
were afterward greatly hampered by our trunks.
We went first to Niagara, stopping two days
at Syracuse in order to examine the salt-works
there. At Niagara we stayed a week, visiting
everything that was to be seen, and enjoyed it
immensely. "John L.," although at this time
only nineteen, was already an enthusiastic student
and collector of insects, especially beetles,
and had with him all the apparatus for collecting,
preserving, etc. He had inherited this taste
from his father, who had been all his life almost
equally distinguished in all departments of
zoology and botany. But recently he had specialized
more and more on insects, especially
coleopters, and of these he had the finest collection
in the United States. John inherited
his father's versatility, but like his father, and
in much greater degree, specialized on coleopters,
and became, as is well known, the most
distinguished coleopterist in the country. I was
myself a keen observer of nature, but not a specialist
nor a collector in any department. I was
interested in John's pursuits, however, and collected
for him whenever I could without interference
with what I regarded as higher pleasures.
For myself, I could think of nothing here
but Niagara, and could not help poking fun at
John for his greater delight in a new species
than in the grandeur of Niagara.
From Niagara we went to Buffalo, then a
small town, and onward to Detroit, which then
had a population of some eight thousand.
Here we stayed a week and saw a good deal of
pleasant society, through the good offices of
some ladies, whom we had met in New York,
and who, moreover, were distant relatives of
ours through a common ancestor, Eatton.
Among the pleasant acquaintances met here was
the Rev. Bishop McCoskey, a fine military looking
man, a fit soldier in the church militant, with
whom we dined several times, and who gave us
letters to the officers at Fort Mackinac. While
at Detroit, we visited Ann Arbor and the University
of Michigan, then a very small affair.
The best thing they had was a rather fine collection
of minerals.
At Detroit, through representations made
us by friends, we took a sudden notion to go to
the Lake Superior country, and determined, if
possible, to go on northwest as far as we could.
We took, therefore, the regular steamer, which
passed through Lake Huron, the Straits of
Mackinac, and southward by Lake Michigan to
Chicago, then a thriving town of five thousand.
The steamer did not stop at Mackinac, but put
us ashore in a boat at 4 A. M., and went on, leaving
us shivering there. I shall never forget
that landing on a bleak sand beach, with not a
soul in sight. What are these strange-looking
canoes lying bottom upward on the beach? We
soon recognized them as birch-bark Indian
canoes. We had read of them and had seen
pictures of them, but had never before seen one.
While walking about them, admiring their graceful
forms, we tapped on one with our knuckles -
such a discordant concert of remonstrant
voices, males growling, females shrieking, and
children piping, arose from beneath! We
precipitately retreated, each laughing at the
other for being so startled. Beneath each canoe
was a whole family of Indians sleeping! After
a little we found some who were awake, and
guided us to the only lodging-house, a poor
miserable tumble-down shanty of rough boards.
The proprietor, a great fat, lazy, tumble-down
man himself, showed us to a really clean, tidy
room, and soon asked us to a breakfast fit for a
king: the most delicious broiled whitefish, steak,
and fragrant coffee. I learned afterward that
Lasly was celebrated far and near for his excellent
table.
After breakfast, we went up to the fort, and
delivered our letters. We were treated with
great courtesy by the officers, especially Captain
Scott and Dr. Holden. Captain Scott, the celebrated
hunter of that time, was an interesting
man, with strong, alert, athletic figure, bright,
eager, keen gray eyes, and ruddy face, bronzed
by long exposure. He was a great disciplinarian,
and the fort was clean and orderly in the
extreme. A famous hunter, his house was full
both of the implements and the spoils of the
chase. All kinds of weapons he showed us;
guns and pistols, swords and daggers, bows and
arrows, slings and crossbows, in the use of all
of which he was equally expert. Every "coign
of vantage" was adorned with elk-horns and
buffalo-heads and grinning jaws of panthers;
before every door were rugs of bearskins and
buffalo-robes. I was intensely interested in the
story of his adventures, for I, too, had some
reputation as a Nimrod; but such big game
overwhelmed me.
Dr. Holden carried us all over the island,
and showed us all the remarkable sights, especially
Arched Rock and Sugar Loaf Rock.
Arched Rock is like a fragment of a great wall,
forty feet high, which had been broken through,
forming a grand archway, like the Washington
Arch in New York. Sugar Loaf is a wonderful
conical peak, about seventy feet high, and
only twenty to thirty feet at the base. I was too
ignorant to understand the origin of these remarkable
features, and I have never seen any
explanation since; but upon reflection, I think
now they were probably remnants of an old
shore cliff, when the waters of the Great Lakes
were higher than now. I asked Lasly about
them: he lazily turned his quid of tobacco to the
other side, and remarked, "Yes, they say that
they're worth seeing, but for my part I'd rather
see a dog-fight."
I noticed, also, that the whole surface of the
island is so thickly covered with drift cobbles
that there is hardly soil enough to hold them together.
This was the first time I was interested
in geological phenomena.
After four or five delightful days at Mackinac,
we hired a canoe and two men to carry us
to Sault Ste. Marie, distant one hundred miles.
As we had to sleep out one night, we bought
blankets and buffalo-robes, the finest of which
at that time cost but a dollar. We started at
10 A. M. and went sixty miles, camping on a little
island. The night was still and sultry, and the
mosquitoes bad; but about midnight it blew up
with some rain, and turned very cold. The men
wanted to get back to Mackinac next day, so we
got up at 3 A. M., cooked breakfast, and started.
The wind was blowing a gale directly in our
faces, and it was freezing cold. I never suffered
more from cold in my life; we drew our
blankets close around us, but the wind seemed
to pass through them as if they were gauze.
We reached Sault Ste. Marie about 9 A. M., and
John and I walked up to town with our blankets
wrapped about us, presenting a very stately
appearance, and exciting the admiration of several
Indian matrons, similarly dressed, minus
the coat and trousers.
We delivered our letters from Captain Scott
to Captain Johnson, and were cordially received,
messing with the officers and having a
jolly good time. We amused ourselves here
watching the skill and dexterity of the Indians
in running up and down the rapids in their
beautiful, but frail, canoes. Here we fell in with
Colonel Gratiot, who, with a lieutenant, Hempstead,
like himself from St. Louis, and ten expert
Cornish copper miners, was on his way to
Keweenaw Point to develop the copper mines
there. We were invited to join the party, and
gladly accepted. The lands had only that summer
been opened by the United States to miners,
and thus it came to pass that I was one of the
first party that commenced operations in these
now celebrated mines.
After staying two or three days at the Sault,
we took ship with Captain Stannard, and after
two days' sail, landed at Eagle Harbor, while
he went on to La Pointe.
Eagle Harbor is a beautiful landlocked bay,
on the north shore of Keweenaw Point, about
two miles long and half a mile wide. We
pitched our tent at the west end of the bay,
where there was a beautiful level sand beach,
and camped here about three weeks; and a most
delightful three weeks we found it. We sometimes
amused ourselves by rambling along the
shores of the Great Lake, collecting the most
beautiful agates; sometimes by rowing on the
harbor in a little rowboat belonging to Gratiot;
sometimes by shooting grouse and squirrels
with Hempstead's gun; sometimes by swimming
in the clear, wine-colored waters of the little
stream.
John was in ecstasies over this place as a
collecting ground for insects. Every morning
the beach was black with insects cast up by the
waves over night. He gathered here in a few
weeks as many species as he could find in as
many years roaming over the country. Insects
essaying to fly over the lake were beaten down
by the winds, drowned, and washed up by the
waves here; or else insects crawling near the
water were carried away by waves and washed
up. The little stream which entered the harbor
near our camp, moreover, brought floating
leaves and trash, and with them, insects to the
bay, and these also were cast up on the beach.
As might be supposed, the insects were mostly
ants and beetles. I often afterward used this
as an illustration of the manner in which strata
black with fossil insects are formed.
We lived bountifully while here, for the lake
teemed with the most delicious whitefish, and
the little river was full of trout. I had the best
opportunity of comparing these two delicacies.
After long hesitation, I gave the palm to the
whitefish. But it must be Lake Superior whitefish.
We varied our diet with an occasional
grouse, and frequent squirrels.
I stayed here, as said, three weeks. Of
course a settlement had to be made for the miners.
Indeed, a town, or perhaps a city, had to
be founded. The party commenced building
log huts, and I took my ax and helped, thus
becoming one of the founders of the city of
Eagle Harbor. Just ten years after this - i. e.,
in the summer of 1854, while I was professor
of geology in the University of Georgia - I received
a letter from Eagle Harbor, asking the
exact date of our arrival and the date of the
completion of the first log cabin. As I had
kept a journal, I easily furnished the desired
information. What was the motive of the letter,
whether a decennial celebration or whether
a legal question of claim, I never knew.
The forests here were a dense growth of
tamarack, larch, birch, etc. In pushing through
this tangled mass, which in some places was
almost impossible, I would sometimes come on
a prostrate log of birch, two feet in diameter
and apparently perfectly sound; but when I
stepped on it, I would break through up to the
knee. The whole of the wood was gone, and
only the hollow bark left. I have many times
used this in illustration of the hollow sigillaria
trees of the coal, for in these, also, the bark was
the most imperishable part.
This kind of life was, of course, hard on
trousers. John's were becoming disreputable -
they had to be patched. We had nothing
but strong bedticking; John covered his whole
seat with a patch nearly a foot square. It is
easy to imagine his picturesque appearance.
On the 3d of July, we regretfully left our
delightful camp and our friends in Eagle Harbor,
and took ship again with Captain Stannard
on his next trip westward. The glorious
Fourth we spent on shipboard, and, therefore,
without the usual celebration. I got up early
on the fifth, and witnessed the most beautiful
mirage I ever saw. I was watching the forests
as we approached La Pointe, and made some
remark. "That is not the shore that you see,"
said the captain; "it is only the loom." As
we approached, the land and the trees on it
became more distinct, and their reflection in
the glassy surface of the lake came in view.
As we still approached, the whole appearance
rose higher and the real tree-tops appeared
interlocked, as it were, with the inverted
trees of the phantom. Gradually the phantom
rose higher and higher, till it disappeared, leaving
only the real. At one time in this gradual
transition there were four repetitions of the
forest, viz., the phantom forest and its reflection,
and the real forest and its reflection. In
explanation, I suppose there was a cold dense
layer of air on the water, for the lake is very
cold, and the greater refraction of this layer
caused the phenomenon. I have often seen it
under similar conditions, but never before or
since so finely displayed.
At La Pointe we took rooms at the house
of Mr. Oakes, the Indian agent. There were
two or three hundred Indians on the island,
but only two white men; Mr. Oakes, who
had married a half-breed Indian woman, and
had two rather pretty quadroon daughters of
seventeen or eighteen; and Dr. Borup, the
American Fur Company's agent, a Norwegian,
and a really intelligent and cultivated gentleman.
We stayed several days at La Pointe in
order to make preparations for a long camping
trip, and one of these was Sunday. In the forenoon
we went to the Christian service; in the
afternoon, to the pagan. I was interested in
both, but especially in the latter. I observed,
too, the same Indians attending with sober devoutness
the one, and then with frenzied delight
the other. Of this latter, which lasted
some three hours, I give a brief description,
though I never clearly understood what it was
all about.
The Indians had built a birch-bark lodge,
seventy to eighty feet long, and thirty or forty
feet wide. In the middle of this they had set
up a post, painted with red stripes. This
seemed to be a temporary representative of the
Great Spirit, Manitiongeh, for they always made
obeisance to it in passing. It is impossible
to describe the strange mixture of dancing,
chanting, drum-beating, and rattle-shaking. It
was apparently a ceremony of initiation of an
old woman into a religious society. She sat on
a number of blankets spread on the ground,
about half-way between the painted post and the
end of the lodge. The blankets were apparently
the initiatory offerings. The audience
sat about the walls all around. Five or six
priests, or medicine-men, with medicine pouches
in their hands, made of the skins of small animals,
retaining the shape of the animal, and especially
the head, marched continuously around
the post, the woman chanting. All that I could
distinguish were the words "Hay - Manitiongeh -
Hay" repeated almost indefinitely.
Every time the medicine-men passed around the
woman, they presented the heads of the animal-bags
toward her, with a "ho-ho-ho-ho," rapidly
pronounced. Whenever this was done, she
bowed her head toward the ground and trembled
violently. Her agitation increased with
every repetition, until finally she fell prostrate
on her face, and was taken out in an insensible
condition, and carried into a small separate
lodge. What occurred there was a religious
secret. As soon as she returned revived, there
commenced a general dance of the whole company,
in which she joined with supernatural activity.
Gradually religious excitement passed
into frenzy, and frenzy into convulsions and insensibility,
and in this condition she was again
borne out.
We stayed at La Pointe several days making
the necessary arrangements for our long trip to
the head-waters of the Mississippi, and thence
to Fort Snelling. From there we expected to
go up the Minnesota River, then called the St.
Peter's. We therefore hired from Dr. Borup a
large-sized birch-bark canoe and two men as
guides and paddlers for forty days, and paid
him at once. We had moccasins made, as it is
not safe to wear boots or shoes in a birch-bark
canoe, and laid in provisions - pork, flour,
cheese, maple-sugar, crackers, tea, coffee, etc.
When ready, we bade good-by to our
friends, not forgetting the pretty quadroons,
and walked down to the canoe. When my foot
went over the side of the canoe, as I had forgotten
about the moccasins, my ankle was
seized - "No, no, not with shoes; must put on
moccasins." The change was soon made, and
we embarked. We wore nothing but these moccasins
on our feet for three weeks.
I stop a moment to describe our canoe and
guides. Our canoe was an ordinary birch-bark,
now so familiar, but then new to me.
Their lightness and grace, their paper-like thinness
and frailty are well known. Ours was larger
than usual, being about twenty-four feet long
and three feet wide. Our guides were Robideau,
a French Canadian and a famous voyageur,
and François Salle, a half-breed French Indian.
They spoke only the barest smattering of English,
and their French was but little better, being
a mixed patois. We, on the other hand,
spoke almost no French, so that our communication
was largely by signs, although we did
manage to understand a little of their patois, and
made them understand some of our bad French.
We started about 8 A. M., July 8th. I can
never forget the delight of that day's sail among
the exquisitely beautiful Apostle Islands. Often
we were completely surrounded by them and
seemed to be in the midst of a little lake, with
picturesque shores changing at every moment.
The islands consisted of level red sandstone,
with bold shores, crowned with heavy forests.
We made a glorious camp our first night
out, among these islands, and enjoyed ourselves
thoroughly.
Next morning we came out from among the
islands, and skirted the south shore of the lake.
Here the guides took us to see a great curiosity;
the south shore of the lake is bordered by an
almost perpendicular cliff of red sandstone
fifty feet high, the heavy level beds of which have
been eaten into and undermined by the waves,
forming caves and arches, which tumble in from
time to time, causing recession of the shore.
At one place the waves had cut far under the
cliff, and the overhanging table was supported
by many gnarled columns of harder sandstone.
The guides took the canoe more than a hundred
yards under the sandstone table-rock, and we
looked out through hundreds of columns on to
the great lake. Above our heads there were
fifty feet of sandstone, crowned with primeval
forest. Through these gloomy corridors,
among these great columns, and beneath these
hollow arches, the waves dashed with a sound
like thunder. It was wonderfully impressive of
the power of waves as an erosive agent. I was
even then convinced that all the Apostle Islands
are but remnants of the same level sandstone,
left by a similar process of erosion. These
phenomena have been described by others since
that time, but I believe my own observations
were the first, as also were the explanations
given in my journal.
We nooned that day near the mouth of the
Bois Brulé River. The guides pointed it out
to us as the way by which they would return
from Fort Snelling. I thought nothing of it
then; but long afterward learned by the investigations
of the geologists of this region that this
was an old outlet of Lake Superior into the Mississippi,
through the St. Croix.
In the afternoon we prevailed on our
guides to take us across to the north shore,
as we desired to see at least something of it
also. After a little hesitation, they struck out
with vigor, remarking that a sudden squall
would be dangerous. The distance was about
twenty-five miles; we went across in about four
hours, and camped for the night on a beautiful
pebble beach. Our guides began immediately
to pitch our tent on a mass of pebbles, each one
about the size of a walnut. We remonstrated,
but they assured us that rounded pebbles make
an excellent bed, and such indeed we found it.
The smooth pebbles slide and roll over one
another, and adjust themselves perfectly to the
form. It was the best bed surface we had yet
found. Sand, on the contrary, though apparently
soft and yielding, as every camper knows
makes the worst possible bed.
Next morning we paddled along the north
shore of the lake, observing as we passed everything
worthy of note, and drew up our canoe for
nooning on a sand-spit stretching across the end
of the lake and separating it from an estuary at
the mouth of the St. Louis River, up which we
were to go. This narrow sand-spit runs from
the north shore for six or seven miles nearly to
the south shore, where there is the only opening
into the St. Louis. Just where we landed is
the site now of the city of Duluth. At that
time, and for many years afterward, there was
not a white settlement within a hundred miles.
While nooning here, I took a delicious swim in
the warm waters of the estuary, right along the
present water-front of Duluth.
The glory of the voyage up the St. Louis
River that afternoon will live forever in my
memory. The day was warm and still, the river
was wide and devious, the water smooth as a
mirror, and the banks clothed in richest verdure.
The Indian villages were strung all along the
river at intervals. At every turn we would
come in view of a new cluster of lodges, and
would be greeted with the peculiar shrill, vibratory
halloo, characteristic of the Indian, made
by vibrating the hand over the mouth. Every
greeting would be answered by our men in a
similar manner, and I too with some practise
succeeded fairly well. We camped that night
at Fond du Lac, an Indian village of two or
three hundred, about ten miles up the river,
where we found a single white man, a Mr.
Boilleau.
Next day we went to the Falls, the Dalles of
the St. Louis, where there is a portage of nine
miles. As this was a serious undertaking, we
had to commence it in the early morning, and
therefore camped here for the rest of the day.
What a glorious swim I took in the roaring cataract
that afternoon! Some twenty or thirty
Indians, men and boys, had come from Fond du
Lac to visit our camp. As I went down the
cataract with railroad speed, they watched me
with the greatest interest, cheering as I passed,
and screaming with delight when I came out victorious.
I bantered them to join me, but
neither entreaty nor jeering would induce them
to try. I went down repeatedly (walking up by
land each time), leaping and playing in the roaring
torrent, laughing and screaming with delight.
Next day began the serious business of the
portage. I was greatly interested in the wonderful
capacity of those men as beasts of burden;
each had a leathern strap, about eighteen
feet long and an inch wide, except in the middle,
where it was three inches wide; this strap was
tied about each end of my trunk by Robideau,
and the trunk thrown over on the back, with the
broad strap on the forehead. This was probably
at least seventy-five pounds; on this a hundred
pounds of pork was put, and on this again
some twenty-five pounds of crackers, making
in all at least two hundred pounds. With this
he went off on a trot. François Salle did the
same with John's trunk, and one hundred
pounds of flour and other things, to make up
two hundred pounds, and followed at the same
gait. We knew we could not make more than
six or seven miles, so we remained in camp until
the afternoon. In about three-quarters of
an hour, the men came back, loaded themselves
again in the same manner, and went off; and
we saw them no more until late in the afternoon.
About four o'clock we started for our next
camp. This was our first experience in walking
any considerable distance in moccasins. The
trail was very rough and stony, and we winced
and shrank at every step. We soon got used to
it, however, or the ground became smoother,
and we went along very well. About half-way
we met the men returning for their last load, the
canoe.
On the way we observed how the portage
was made. The whole distance was divided
into stages about a mile apart. The first load
was carried to the first stage and deposited, and
the men returned to camp for the second load;
this was carried two miles and deposited, then
they returned to stage No. 1, and carried the
load to No. 3, then back to No. 2, and carried
that load to No. 4, etc., until all except the
canoe had been deposited at the camp for the
night.
Then the men returned to our former camp,
took up the canoe, one at each end, and carried
it the seven miles to the new camp. It is
seen then that they went over the ground
five times, equaling thirty-five miles, and one-half
the time each was loaded with two hundred
pounds. It certainly was an extraordinary feat
of strength and endurance; one that I do not believe
any other animal of similar size could possibly
accomplish. The peculiarity of man in
which he is superior to any other animal, is his
capacity for training. Moreover, I believe that
the white race is superior in this respect to any
other race; and still more, that even in white
men, good blood tells in this regard, as it does
in horses. The great difference in men consists
mainly in the capacity for improvement by
training: some improve greatly and indefinitely;
some hardly at all, and quickly reach
their limit.
Early next morning while we were eating
our breakfast, a party of Indians, men, women,
and children, passed our camp, making the same
portage; but as they had little baggage they
traveled fast, and we saw them no more. The
men were stark naked, except for a narrow
breech-cloth, that passed between the legs and
under a belt around the waist; and carried nothing
except their bows and arrows. The women
were better clothed, indeed, but each was bowed
beneath a heavy load. One of them carried the
canoe on her head, bottom upward, like an immense
scoop-bonnet. Soon after the Indians
passed we left our camp, which was in the midst
of a dense forest, on the margin of a beautiful
streamlet; and re-commenced our portage in the
same style as yesterday. We easily finished
the remaining three miles by noon, and embarked
again.
We had been told at La Pointe that we
should find the mosquitoes very bad in some
parts of the country passed over, and had made
preparations accordingly. It was here that we
began to feel these torments. We had indeed
felt a few at Eagle Harbor, and at nearly all our
camps on Lake Superior; but here they became
intolerable. On this day, for the first time since
we left Sault Ste. Marie, the sky was cloudy.
Not only had we now mosquitoes all day, but
also brulos. These are almost invisible black
gnats, somewhat like the sand-fleas of the South,
but still smaller and black;
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
In corporal sufferance finds a pang as great
As when a giant dies.
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37CHAPTER II
COLLEGE LIFE; CHOICE OF A PROFESSION;
FIRST LOVE
ON the 16th of January, 1838, we started
for college, John, Lewis, and I. John had already
been in college three years, and was now
in the senior class. Lewis and I were leaving
home for the first time. Everything was new
to me, so in spite of my recent sorrow I was
ashamed to find my spirits rapidly reviving.
Though Athens was but three hundred miles
distant, we were a week on the road, for the
journey was all by stage, except twenty miles on
the newly made Georgia Railroad, the first in the
State. There is very little to be said of the tedious
journey. Two incidents on the way may, perhaps,
be worth mentioning, as showing my extreme
inexperience and the moral influences
under which I had been reared.
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62CHAPTER III
MEDICAL STUDY IN NEW YORK; TRIP THROUGH
THE NORTHWEST
I SPENT the whole winter and the spring
until May attending lectures at the College of
Physicians and Surgeons, then on Crosby street,
New York. It was a constant grind, grind of
lectures, six lectures every day for six days in
the week. During the winter course of four
months the professors were Drs. Parker, Gilman,
James M. Smith, Watts, Beck, and Torrey.
This was followed by a spring course of two
months by specialists, of whom I particularly
remember Dr. Alonzo Clark, who lectured on
pulmonary diseases.
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85