Funding from Library of
Congress/Ameritech National Digital
Library Competition
supported the electronic publication
of this title.
Text scanned (OCR) by
Megan Winget and Jordan Davis
Images scanned by
Jill Kuhn
Text encoded by
Jill Kuhn and Natalia Smith
First edition, 1998
ca. 500K
Academic Affairs Library, UNC-CH
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
1998.
© This work is
the property of the
University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research,
teaching and personal use as long as this statement of availability
is included in the text.
The electronic edition
is a part of the UNC-CH
digitization project, Documenting the American South.
Library of Congress Subject Headings,
19th edition, 1996
Any hyphens occurring
in line breaks have been
removed, and the trailing part of a word has been joined to
the preceding line.
All quotation marks
and ampersand have been transcribed as
entity references.
All double right and
left quotation marks are encoded as " and "
respectively.
All single right and
left quotation marks are encoded
as ' and ' respectively.
Indentation in lines
has not been preserved.
Running titles have
not been preserved.
Spell-check and
verification made against printed
text using Author/Editor (SoftQuad) and Microsoft Word
spell check programs.
LC Subject Headings:
Henry Watterson (about 1908)
[Frontispiece Image]
By
VOLUME I
Illustrated
COPYRIGHT, 1919,
BY GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY
COPYRIGHT, 1919, BY THE CURTIS PUBLISHING COMPANY
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TO MY FRIEND
ALEXANDER KONTA
WITH AFFECTIONATE SALUTATION
"MANSFIELD,"
1919
A
mound of earth a little higher graded:
Perhaps
upon a stone a chiselled name:
A
dab of printer's ink soon blurred and faded—
And
then oblivion—that—that is fame!
—HENRY WATTERSON
I AM BORN AND BEGIN TO TAKE NOTICE—JOHN
I AM asked to jot down a few autobiographic
odds and ends from such data of record and
memory as I may retain. I have been something
of a student of life; an observer of men and women
and affairs; an appraiser of their character, their
conduct, and, on occasion, of their motives. Thus,
a kind of instinct, which bred a tendency and grew
to a habit, has led me into many and diverse
companies, the lowest not always the meanest.
Circumstance has rather favored than hindered
this bent. I was born in a party camp and grew to
manhood on a political battlefield. I have lived
through stirring times and in the thick of events.
In a vein colloquial and reminiscential, not
ambitious, let me recall some impressions which these
have left upon the mind of one who long ago
reached and turned the corner of the Scriptural
limitation; who, approaching fourscore, does not
yet feel painfully the frost of age beneath the
ravage of time's defacing waves. Assuredly they
have not obliterated his sense either of vision or
vista. Mindful of the adjuration of Burns,
I shall yet hold little in reserve, having no state
secrets or mysteries of the soul to reveal.
It is not my purpose to be or to seem oracular.
I shall not write after the manner of Rousseau,
whose Confessions had been better honored in the
breach than the observance, and in any event whose
sincerity will bear question; nor have I tales to tell
after the manner of Paul Barras, whose Memoirs
have earned him an immortality of infamy.
Neither shall I emulate the grandiose volubility and
self-complacent posing of Metternich and Talleyrand,
whose pretentious volumes rest for the most
part unopened upon dusty shelves. I aspire to
none of the honors of the historian. It shall be
my aim as far as may be to avoid the garrulity of
the raconteur and to restrain the exaggerations of
the ego. But neither fear of the charge of
self-exploitation nor the specter of a modesty oft too
obtrusive to be real shall deter me from a proper
freedom of narration, where, though in the main
but a humble chronicler, I must needs appear upon
the scene and speak of myself; for I at least have
not always been a dummy and have sometimes in
a way helped to make history.
In my early life—as it were, my salad days—I
aspired to becoming what old Simon Cameron
called "one of those damned literary fellows" and
Thomas Carlyle less profanely described as "a
leeterary celeebrity." But some malign fate always
sat upon my ambitions in this regard. It was easy
to become The National Gambler in Nast's
cartoons, and yet easier The National Drunkard
through the medium of the everlasting mint-julep
joke; but the phantom of the laurel crown would
never linger upon my fair young brow.
Though I wrote verses for the early issues of
Harper's Weekly—happily no one can now prove
them on me, for even at that jejune period I had
the prudence to use an anonym—the Harpers,
luckily for me, declined to publish a volume of my
poems. I went to London, carrying with me "the
great American novel." It was actually accepted
by my ever too partial friend, Alexander Macmillan.
But, rest his dear old soul, he died and his
successors refused to see the transcendent merit of
that performance, a view which my own maturing
sense of belles-lettres values subsequently came to
verify.
When George Harvey arrived at the front I
" 'ad 'opes." But, Lord, that cast-iron man had
never any bookish bowels of compassion—or political
either for the matter of that!—so that finally I
gave up fiction and resigned myself to the humble
category of the crushed tragi-comedians of literature,
who inevitably drift into journalism.
Thus my destiny has been casual. A great man
of letters quite thwarted, I became a newspaper
reporter—a voluminous space writer for the press
—now and again an editor and managing editor—
until, when I was nearly thirty years of age, I hit
the Kentucky trail and set up for a journalist. I did
this, however, with a big "J," nursing for a while
some faint ambitions of statesmanship—even office
—but in the end discarding everything that might
obstruct my entire freedom, for I came into the
world an insurgent, or, as I have sometimes
described myself in the Kentucky vernacular, "a free
nigger and not a slave nigger."
Though born in a party camp and grown to manhood
on a political battlefield my earlier years were
most seriously influenced by the religious spirit of
the times. We passed to and fro between Washington
and the two family homesteads in Tennessee,
which had cradled respectively my father and
mother, Beech Grove in Bedford County, and
Spring Hill in Maury County. Both my grandfathers
were devout churchmen of the Presbyterian
faith. My Grandfather Black, indeed, was the son
of a Presbyterian clergyman, who lived, preached
and died in Madison County, Kentucky. He was
descended, I am assured, in a straight line from
that David Black, of Edinburgh, who, as Burkle
tells us, having declared in a sermon that Elizabeth
of England was a harlot, and her cousin, Mary
Queen of Scots, little better, went to prison for it
—all honor to his memory.
My Grandfather Watterson was a man of mark
in his day. He was decidedly a constructive—the
projector and in part the builder of an important
railway line—an early friend and comrade of
General Jackson, who was all too busy to take office,
and, indeed, who throughout his life disdained the
ephemeral honors of public life. The Wattersons
had migrated directly from Virginia to Tennessee.
The two families were prosperous, even wealthy
for those days, and my father had entered public
life with plenty of money, and General Jackson
for his sponsor. It was not, however, his ambitions
or his career that interested me—that is, not until
I was well into my teens—but the camp meetings
and the revivalist preachers delivering the Word
of God with more or less of ignorant yet often of
very eloquent and convincing fervor.
The wave of the great Awakening of 1800 had
not yet subsided. Bascom was still alive. I have
heard him preach. The people were filled with
thoughts of heaven and hell, of the immortality of
the soul and the life everlasting, of the Redeemer
and the Cross of Calvary. The camp ground
witnessed an annual muster of the adjacent countryside.
The revival was a religious hysteria lasting
ten days or two weeks. The sermons were appeals
to the emotions. The songs were the outpourings
of the soul in ecstacy. There was no fanaticism of
the death-dealing, proscriptive sort; nor any
conscious cant; simplicity, childlike belief in future
rewards and punishments, the orthodox Gospel the
universal rule. There was a good deal of doughty
controversy between the churches, as between the
parties; but love of the Union and the Lord was
the bedrock of every confession.
Inevitably an impressionable and imaginative
mind opening to such sights and sounds as it
emerged from infancy must have been deeply
affected. Until I was twelve years old the
enchantment of religion had complete possession of my
understanding. With the loudest, I could sing all
the hymns. Being early taught in music I began
to transpose them into many sorts of rhythmic
movement for the edification of my companions.
Their words, aimed directly at the heart, sank,
never to be forgotten, into my memory. To this
day I can repeat the most of them—though not
without a break of voice—while too much dwelling
upon them would stir me to a pitch of feeling
which a life of activity in very different walks and
ways and a certain self-control I have been always
able to command would scarcely suffice to restrain.
The truth is that I retain the spiritual essentials
I learned then and there. I never had the young
man's period of disbelief. There has never been a
time when if the Angel of Death had appeared
upon the scene—no matter how festal—I would
not have knelt with adoration and welcome; never
a time on the battlefield or at sea when if the
elements had opened to swallow me I would not have
gone down shouting!
Sectarianism in time yielded to universalism.
Theology came to seem to my mind more and more
a weapon in the hands of Satan to embroil and
divide the churches. I found in the Sermon on
the Mount leading enough for my ethical guidance,
in the life and death of the Man of Galilee inspiration
enough to fulfill my heart's desire; and though
I have read a great deal of modern inquiry—from
Renan and Huxley through Newman and Döllinger,
embracing debates before, during and after
the English upheaval of the late fifties and the
Ecumenical Council of 1870, including the various
raids upon the Westminster Confession, especially
the revision of the Bible, down to writers like
Frederic Harrison and Doctor Campbell—I have
found nothing to shake my childlike faith in the
simple rescript of Christ and Him crucified.
From their admission into the Union, the States
of Kentucky and Tennessee have held a relation to
the politics of the country somewhat disproportioned
to their population and wealth. As between
the two parties from the Jacksonian era to
the War of Sections, each was closely and hotly
contested. If not the birthplace of what was called
"stump oratory," in them that picturesque form of
party warfare flourished most and lasted longest.
The "barbecue" was at once a rustic feast and a
forum of political debate. Especially notable was
the presidential campaign of 1840, the year of
my birth, "Tippecanoe and Tyler," for the Whig
slogan—"Old Hickory" and "the battle of New
Orleans," the Democratic rallying cry—Jackson
and Clay, the adored party chieftains.
I grew up in the one State, and have passed the
rest of my life in the other, cherishing for both a
deep affection, and, maybe, over-estimating their
hold upon the public interest. Excepting General
Jackson, who was a fighter and not a talker, their
public men, with Henry Clay and Felix Grundy in
the lead, were "stump orators." He who could not
relate and impersonate an anecdote to illustrate and
clinch his argument, nor "make the welkin ring"
with the clarion tones of his voice, was politically
good for nothing. James K. Polk and James C.
Jones led the van of stump orators in Tennessee,
Ben Hardin, John J. Crittenden and John C.
Breckenridge in Kentucky. Tradition still has
stories to tell of their exploits and prowess, their wit
and eloquence, even their commonplace sayings
and doings. They were marked men who never
failed to captivate their audiences. The system of
stump oratory had many advantages as a public
force and was both edifying and educational.
There were a few conspicuous writers for the press,
such as Ritchie, Greeley and Prentice. But the
day of personal journalism and newspaper
influence came later.
I was born at Washington—February 16, 1840
—"a bad year for Democrats," as my father used
to say, adding: "I am afraid the boy will grow up
to be a Whig."
In those primitive days there were only Whigs
and Democrats. Men took their politics, as their
liquor, "straight"; and this father of mine was an
undoubting Democrat of the schools of Jefferson
and Jackson. He had succeeded James K. Polk
in Congress when the future President was elected
governor of Tennessee; though when nominated he
was little beyond the age required to qualify as a
member of the House.
To the end of his long life he appeared to me the
embodiment of wisdom, integrity and couarge.
And so he was—a man of tremendous force of
character, yet of surpassing sweetness of disposition;
singularly disdainful of office, and indeed of
preferment of every sort; a profuse maker and a
prodigal spender of money; who, his needs and
recognition assured, cared nothing at all for what
he regarded as the costly glories of the little great
men who rattled round in places often much too
big for them.
Immediately succeeding Mr. Polk, and such a
youth in appearance, he attracted instant attention.
His father, my grandfather, allowed him a larger
income than was good for him—seeing that the per
diem then paid Congressmen was altogether insufficient
—and during the earlier days of his sojourn in
the national capital he cut a wide swath; his
principal yokemate in the pleasures and dissipations of
those times being Franklin Pierce, at first a
representative and then a senator from New Hampshire.
Fortunately for both of them, they were whisked
out of Washington by their families in 1843; my
father into the diplomatic service and Mr. Pierce
to the seclusion of his New England home. They
kept in close touch, however, the one with the other,
and ten years later, in 1853, were back again upon
the scene of their rather conspicuous frivolity,
Pierce as President of the United States, my father,
who had preceded him a year or two, as editor
of the Washington Union, the organ of the
Administration.
When I was a boy the national capital was still
rife with stories of their escapades. One that I
recall had it that on a certain occasion returning
from an excursion late at night my father missed
his footing and fell into the canal that then divided
the city, and that Pierce, after many fruitless
efforts, unable to assist him to dry land, exclaimed,
"Well, Harvey, I can't get you out, but I'll get in
with you," suiting the action to the word. And
there they were found and rescued by a party of
passers, very well pleased with themselves.
My father's absence in South America extended
over two years. My mother's health, maybe her
aversion to a long overseas journey, kept her at
home, and very soon he tired of life abroad without
her and came back. A committee of citizens went
on a steamer down the river to meet him, the wife
and child along, of course, and the story was told
that, seated on the paternal knee curiously observant
of every detail, the brat suddenly exclaimed,
"Ah ha, pa! Now you've got on your store clothes.
But when ma gets you up at Beech Grove you'll
have to lay off your broadcloth and put on your
jeans, like I do."
Being an only child and often an invalid, I was a
pet in the family and many tales were told of my
infantile precocity. On one occasion I had a fight
with a little colored boy of my own age and I need
not say got the worst of it. My grandfather, who
came up betimes and separated us, said, "he has
blackened your eye and he shall black your boots,"
thereafter making me a deed to the lad. We grew
up together in the greatest amity and in due time I
gave him his freedom, and again to drop into the
vernacular—"that was the only nigger I ever
owned." I should add that in the "War of
Sections" he fell in battle bravely fighting for the
freedom of his race.
It is truth to say that I cannot recall the time
when I was not passionately opposed to slavery, a
crank on the subject of personal liberty, if I am a
crank about anything.
In those days a less attractive place than the city
of Washington could hardly be imagined. It was
scattered over an ill-paved and half-filled oblong
extending east and west from the Capitol to the
White House, and north and south from the line of
the Maryland hills to the Potomac River. One does
not wonder that the early Britishers, led by Tom
Moore, made game of it, for it was both unpromising
and unsightly.
Private carriages were not numerous. Hackney
coaches had to be especially ordered. The only
public conveyance was a rickety old omnibus which,
making hourly trips, plied its lazy journey between
the Navy Yard and Georgetown. There was a
livery stable—Kimball's—having "stalls," as the
sleeping apartments above came to be called, thus
literally serving man and beast. These stalls often
lodged very distinguished people. Kimball, the
proprietor, a New Hampshire Democrat of imposing
appearance, was one of the last Washingtonians
to wear knee breeches and a ruffled shirt. He was a
great admirer of my father and his place was a
resort of my childhood.
One day in the early April of 1852 I was
humped in a chair upon one side of the open
entrance reading a book—Mr. Kimball seated on the
other side reading a newspaper—when there came
down the street a tall, greasy-looking person, who
as he approached said: "Kimball, I have another
letter here from Frank."
"Well, what does Frank say?"
Then the letter was produced, read and discussed.
It was all about the coming National Democratic
Convention and its prospective nominee for President
of the United States, "Frank" seeming to be
a principal. To me it sounded very queer. But I
took it all in, and as soon as I reached home I put
it up to my father:
"How comes it," I asked, "that a big old loafer
gets a letter from a candidate for President and
talks it over with the keeper of a livery stable?
What have such people to do with such things?"
My father said: "My son, Mr. Kimball is an
estimable man. He has been an important and
popular Democrat in New Hampshire. He is not
without influence here. The Frank they talked
about is Gen. Franklin Pierce, of New Hampshire,
an old friend and neighbor of Mr. Kimball.
General Pierce served in Congress with me and some
of us are thinking that we may nominate him for
President. The 'big old loafer,' as you call him,
was Mr. John C. Rives, a most distinguished and
influential Democrat indeed."
Three months later, when the event came to pass,
I could tell all about Gen. Franklin Pierce. His
nomination was no surprise to me, though to the
country at large it was almost a shock. He had
been nowhere seriously considered.
In illustration of this a funny incident recurs to
me. At Nashville the night of the nomination a
party of Whigs and Democrats had gathered in
front of the principal hotel waiting for the arrival
of the news, among the rest Sam Bugg and Chunky
Towles, two local gamblers, both undoubting
Democrats. At length Chunky Towles, worn out,
went off to bed. The result was finally flashed over
the wires. The crowd was nonplused. "Who the
hell is Franklin Pierce?" passed from lip to lip.
Sam Bugg knew his political catechism well. He
proceeded at length to tell all about Franklin
Pierce, ending with the opinion that he was the
man wanted and would be elected hands down, and
he had a thousand dollars to bet on it.
Then he slipped away to tell his pal.
"Wake up, Chunky," he cried. "We got a candidate
—Gen. Franklin Pierce, of New Hampshire."
"Who the—"
"Chunky," says Sam. "I am ashamed of your
ignorance. Gen. Franklin Pierce is the son of
Gen. Benjamin Pierce, of Revolutionary fame.
He has served in both houses of Congress. He
declined a seat in Polk's Cabinet. He won distinction
in the Mexican War. He is the very candidate
we've been after."
"In that case," says Chunky, "I'll get up."
When be reappeared Petway, the Whig leader of
the gathering, who had been deriding the convention,
the candidate and all things else Democratic,
exclaimed:
"Here comes Chunky Towles. He's a good
Democrat; and I'll bet ten to one he never heard
of Franklin Pierce in his life before."
Chunky Towles was one of the handsomest men
of his time. His strong suit was his unruffled
composure and cool self-control. "Mr. Petway," says
he, "you would lose your money, and I won't take
advantage of any man's ignorance. Besides, I
never gamble on a certainty. Gen. Franklin
Pierce, sir, is a son of Gen. Benjamin Pierce of
Revolutionary memory. He served in both houses
of Congress, sir—refused a seat in Polk's Cabinet,
sir—won distinction in the Mexican War, sir. He
has been from the first my choice, and I've money
to bet on his election."
Franklin Pierce had an only son, named Benny,
after his grandfather, the Revolutionary hero. He
was of my own age. I was planning the good time
we were going to have in the White House when
tidings came that he had been killed in a railway
accident. It was a grievous blow, from which the
stricken mother never recovered. One of the most
vivid memories and altogether the saddest episode
of my childhood is that a few weeks later I was
carried up to the Executive Mansion, which, all
formality and marble, seemed cold enough for a
mausoleum, where a lady in black took me in her
arms and convulsively held me there, weeping as
if her heart would break.
Sometimes a fancy, rather vague, comes to me
of seeing the soldiers go off to the Mexican War
and of making flags striped with pokeberry juice
—somehow the name of the fruit was mingled with
that of the President—though a visit quite a year
before to The Hermitage, which adjoined the farm
of an uncle, to see General Jackson is still
uneffaced.
I remember it vividly. The old hero dandled me
in his arms, saying "So this is Harvey's boy," I
looking the while in vain for the "hickory," of
which I had heard so much.
On the personal side history owes General Jackson
reparation. His personality needs indeed complete
reconstruction in the popular mind, which
misconceives him a rough frontiersman having few
or none of the social graces. In point of fact he
came into the world a gentleman, a leader, a knight-errant
who captivated women and dominated men.
I shared when a young man the common belief
about him. But there is ample proof of the error
of this. From middle age, though he ever liked a
horse race, he was a regular if not a devout churchman.
He did not swear at all, "by the Eternal"
or any other oath. When he reached New Orleans
in 1814 to take command of the army, Governor
Claiborne gave him a dinner; and after he had gone
Mrs. Claiborne, who knew European courts and
society better than any other American woman,
said to her husband: "Call that man a backwoodsman?
He is the finest gentleman I ever met!"
There is another witness—Mr. Buchanan, afterward
President—who tells how he took a distinguished
English lady to the White House when
Old Hickory was President; how he went up to
the general's private apartment, where he found
him in a ragged robe-de-chambre, smoking his
pipe; how, when he intimated that the President
might before coming down slick himself a bit, he
received the half-laughing rebuke: "Buchanan, I
once knew a man in Virginia who made himself
independently rich by minding his own business";
how, when he did come down, he was en règle; and
finally how, after a half hour of delightful talk, the
English lady as they regained the street broke forth
with enthusiasm, using almost the selfsame words
of Mrs. Claiborne: "He is the finest gentleman I
ever met in the whole course of my life."
The Presidential campaign of 1848—and the
concurrent return of the Mexican soldiers—seems
but yesterday. We were in Nashville, where the
camp fires of the two parties burned fiercely day
and night, Tennessee a debatable, even a pivotal
state. I was an enthusiastic politician on the Cass
and Butler side, and was correspondingly disappointed
when the election went against us for Taylor
and Fillmore, though a little mollified when,
on his way to Washington, General Taylor grasping
his old comrade, my grandfather, by the hand,
called him "Billy," and paternally stroked my
curls.
Though the next winter we passed in Washington
I never saw him in the White House. He died
in July, 1850, and was succeeded by Millard
Fillmore. It is common to speak of Old Rough and
Ready as an ignoramus. I don't think this. He
may not have been very courtly, but he was a
gentleman.
Later in life I came to know Millard Fillmore
well and to esteem him highly. Once he told me
that Daniel Webster had said to him: "Fillmore,
I like Clay—I like Clay very much—but he rides
rough, sir; damned rough!"
I was fond of going to the Capitol and of playing
amateur page in the House, of which my father
had been a member and where he had many friends,
though I was never officially a page. There was in
particular a little old bald-headed gentleman who
was good to me and would put his arm about me
and stroll with me across the rotunda to the Library
of Congress and get me books to read. I was not
so young as not to know that he was an ex-President
of the United States, and to realize the meaning
of it. He had been the oldest member of the
House when my father was the youngest. He was
John Quincy Adams. By chance I was on the
floor of the House when he fell in his place, and
followed the excited and tearful throng when they
bore him into the Speaker's Room, kneeling by the
side of the sofa with an improvised fan and crying
as if my heart would break.
One day in the spring of 1851 my father took me
to a little hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue near the
Capitol and into a stuffy room, where a snuffy old
man wearing an ill-fitting wig was busying himself
over a pile of documents. He turned about and
was very hearty.
"Aha, you've brought the boy," said he.
And my father said: "My son, you wanted to
see General Cass, and here he is."
My enthusiasm over the Cass and Butler campaign
had not subsided. Inevitably General Cass
was to me the greatest of heroes. My father had
been and always remained his close friend. Later
along we dwelt together at Willard's Hotel, my
mother a chaperon for Miss Belle Cass, afterward
Madame Von Limbourg, and I came into familiar
intercourse with the family.
The general made me something of a pet and
never ceased to be a hero to me. I still think he
was one of the foremost statesmen of his time and
treasure a birthday present he made me when I was
just entering my teens.
The hour I passed with him that afternoon I shall
never forget.
As we were about taking our leave my father
said: "Well, my son, you have seen General Cass;
what do you think of him?"
And the general patting me affectionately on the
head laughingly said: "He thinks he has seen a
pretty good-looking old fogy—that is what he
thinks!"
There flourished in the village life of Washington
two old blokes—no other word can properly describe
them—Jack Dade, who signed himself "the
Honorable John W. Dade, of Virginia;" and
Beau Hickman, who hailed from nowhere and
acquired the pseudonym through sheer impudence.
In one way and another they lived by their wits,
the one all dignity, the other all cheek. Hickman
fell very early in his career of sponge and beggar,
but Dade lived long and died in office—indeed,
toward the close an office was actually created for
him.
Dade had been a schoolmate of John Tyler—so
intimate they were that at college they were called
"the two Jacks"—and when the death of Harrison
made Tyler President, the "off Jack," as he dubbed
himself, went up to the White House and said:
"Jack Tyler, you've had luck and I haven't. You
must do something for me and do it quick. I'm
hard up and I want an office."
"You old reprobate," said Tyler, "what office
on earth do you think you are fit to fill?"
"Well," said Dade, "I have heard them talking
round here of a place they call a sine-cu-ree—big
pay and no work—and if there is one of them left
and lying about loose I think I could fill it to a T."
"All right," said the President good naturedly,
"I'll see what can be done. Come up to-morrow."
The next day "Col. John W. Dade, of Virginia,"
was appointed keeper of the Federal prison of the
District of Columbia. He assumed his post with
empressement, called the prisoners before him and
made them an address.
"Ladies and gentlemen," said he; "I have been
chosen by my friend, the President of the United
States, as superintendent of this eleemosynary
institution. It is my intention to treat you all as a
Virginia gentleman should treat a body of American
ladies and gentlemen gathered here from all
parts of our beloved Union, and I shall expect the
same consideration in return. Otherwise I will
turn you all out upon the cold mercies of a
heartless world and you will have to work for your
living."
There came to Congress from Alabama a roistering
blade by the name of McConnell. He was
something of a wit. During his brief sojourn in
the national capital he made a noisy record for
himself as an all-round, all-night man about town, a
dare-devil and a spendthrift. His first encounter
with Col. John W. Dade, of Virginia, used to be
one of the standard local jokes. Colonel Dade was
seated in the barroom of Brown's Hotel early one
morning, waiting for someone to come in and invite
him to drink.
Presently McConnell arrived. It was his custom
when he entered a saloon to ask the entire roomful,
no matter how many, "to come up and licker," and,
of course, he invited the solitary stranger.
When the glasses were filled Dade pompously
said: "With whom have I the honor of drinking?"
"My name," answered McConnell, "is Felix
Grundy McConnell, begad! I am a member of
Congress from Alabama. My mother is a justice
of the peace, my aunt keeps a livery stable, and my
grandmother commanded a company in the Revolution
and fit the British, gol darn their souls!"
Dade pushed his glass aside.
"Sir," said he, "I am a man of high aspirations
and peregrinations and can have nothing to do with
such low-down scopangers as yourself. Good morning,
sir!"
It may be presumed that both spoke in jest, because
they became inseparable companions and the
best of friends.
McConnell had a tragic ending. In James K.
Polk's diary I find two entries under the dates,
respectively, of September 8 and September 10,
1846. The first of these reads as follows: "Hon.
Felix G. McConnell, a representative in Congress
from Alabama called. He looked very badly and
as though he had just recovered from a fit of
intoxication. He was sober, but was pale, his
countenance haggard and his system nervous. He
applied to me to borrow one hundred dollars and said
he would return it to me in ten days.
"Though I had no idea that he would do so I
had a sympathy for him even in his dissipation. I
had known him in his youth and had not the moral
courage to refuse. I gave him the one hundred
dollars in gold and took his note. His hand was
so tremulous that he could scarcely write his name
to the note legibly. I think it probable that he will
never pay me. He informed me he was detained
at Washington attending to some business in the
Indian Office. I supposed he had returned home
at the adjournment of Congress until he called
to-day. I doubt whether he has any business in
Washington, but fear he has been detained by
dissipation."
The second of Mr. Polk's entries is a corollary
of the first and reads: "About dark this evening I
learned from Mr. Voorhies, who is acting as my
private secretary during the absence of J. Knox
Walker, that Hon. Felix G. McConnell, a
representative in Congress from the state of Alabama,
had committed suicide this afternoon at the St.
Charles Hotel, where he boarded. On Tuesday
last Mr. McConnell called on me and I loaned him
one hundred dollars. [See this diary of that day.]
I learn that but a short time before the horrid deed
was committed he was in the barroom of the St.
Charles Hotel handling gold pieces and stating that
be had received them from me, and that he loaned
thirty-five dollars of them to the barkeeper, that
shortly afterward he had attempted to write something,
but what I have not learned, but he had not
written much when he said he would go to his
room.
"In the course of the morning I learn he went
into the city and paid a hackman a small amount
which he owed him. He had locked his room door,
and when found he was stretched out on his back
with his hands extended, weltering in his blood. He
had three wounds in the abdomen and his throat
was cut. A hawkbill knife was found near him.
A jury of inquest was held and found a verdict that
he had destroyed himself. It was a melancholy
instance of the effects of intemperance. Mr.
McConnell when a youth resided at Fayetteville in
my congressional district. Shortly after he grew
up to manhood he was at my instance appointed
postmaster of that town. He was a true Democrat
and a sincere friend of mine.
"His family in Tennessee are highly respectable
and quite numerous. The information as to the
manner and particulars of his death I learned from
Mr. Voorhies, who reported it to me as he had heard
it in the streets. Mr. McConnell removed from
Tennessee to Alabama some years ago, and I learn
he has left a wife and three or four children."
Poor Felix Grundy McConnell! At a school in
Tennessee he was a roommate of my father, who
related that one night Felix awakened with a
scream from a bad dream he had, the dream being
that he had cut his own throat.
"Old Jack Dade," as he was always called, lived
on, from hand to mouth, I dare say—for he lost his
job as keeper of the district prison—yet never
wholly out-at-heel, scrupulously neat in his person
no matter how seedy the attire. On the completion
of the new wings of the Capitol and the removal
of the House to its more commodious quarters he
was made custodian of the old Hall of Representatives,
a post he held until he died.
Between the idiot and the man of sense, the
lunatic and the man of genius, there are degrees—
streaks—of idiocy and lunacy. How many expectant
politicians elected to Congress have entered
Washington all hope, eager to dare and do, to come
away broken in health, fame and fortune, happy
to get back home—sometimes unable to get away,
to linger on in obscurity and poverty to a squalid
and wretched old age.
I have lived long enough to have known many
such: Senators who have filled the galleries when
they rose to speak; House heroes living while they
could on borrowed money, then banging about the
hotels begging for money to buy drink.
There was a famous statesman and orator who
came to this at last, of whom the typical and
characteristic story was told that the holder of a claim
against the Government, who dared not approach
so great a man with so much as the intimation of a
bribe, undertook by argument to interest him in the
merit of the case.
The great man listened and replied: "I have
noticed you scattering your means round here
pretty freely but you haven't said 'turkey' to me."
Surprised but glad and unabashed the claimant
said "I was coming to that," produced a thousand-dollar
bank roll and entered into an understanding
as to what was to be done next day, when the
bill was due on the calendar.
The great man took the money, repaired to a
gambling house, had an extraordinary run of luck,
won heavily, and playing all night, forgetting about
his engagement, went to bed at daylight, not
appearing in the House at all. The bill was called,
and there being nobody to represent it, under the
rule it went over and to the bottom of the calendar,
killed for that session at least.
The day after the claimant met his recreant
attorney on the avenue face to face and took him to
task for his delinquency.
"Ah, yes," said the great man, "you are the little
rascal who tried to bribe me the other day. Here
is your dirty money. Take it and be off with you.
I was just seeing how far you would go."
The comment made by those who best knew the
great man was that if instead of winning in the
gambling house he had lost he would have been up
betimes at his place in the House, and doing his
utmost to pass the claimant's bill and obtain a
second fee.
Another memory of those days has to do with
music. This was the coming of Jenny Lind to
America. It seemed an event. When she reached
Washington Mr. Barnum asked at the office of my
father's newspaper for a smart lad to sell the
programs of the concert—a new thing in artistic
showmanry. "I don't want a paper carrier, or a
newsboy," said he, "but a young gentleman, three
or four young gentlemen." I was sent to him. We
readily agreed upon the commission to be received
—five cents on each twenty-five cent program—
the oldest of old men do not forget such transactions.
But, as an extra percentage for "organizing
the force," I demanded a concert seat. Choice
seats were going at a fabulous figure and Barnum
at first demurred. But I told him I was a musical
student, stood my ground, and, perhaps seeing
something unusual in the eager spirit of a little boy,
he gave in and the bargain was struck.
Two of my pals became my assistants. But my
sales beat both of them hollow. Before the concert
began I had sold my programs and was in my seat.
I recall that my money profit was something over
five dollars.
The bell-like tones of the Jenny Lind voice in
"Home, Sweet Home," and "The Last Rose of
Summer" still come back to me, but too long
after for me to make, or imagine, comparisons
between it and the vocalism of Grisi, Sontag and
Parepa-Rosa.
Meeting Mr. Barnum at Madison Square
Garden in New York, when he was running one
of his entertainments there, I told him the story,
and we had a hearty laugh, both of us very much
pleased, he very much surprised to find in me a
former employee.
One of my earliest yearnings was for a home.
I cannot recall the time when I was not sick and
tired of our migrations between Washington City
and the two grand-paternal homesteads in Tennessee.
The travel counted for much of my aversion
to the nomadic life we led. The stagecoach
is happier in the contemplation than in the
actuality. Even when the railways arrived there
were no sleeping cars, the time of transit three or
four days and nights. In the earlier journeys it
had been ten or twelve days.
SLAVERY THE TROUBLE-MAKER—BREAK UP OF THE
WHETHER the War of Sections—as it
should be called, because, except in Eastern
Tennessee and in three of the Border States,
Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, it was nowise a
civil war—could have been averted must ever
remain a question of useless speculation. In recognizing
the institution of African slavery, with no provision
for its ultimate removal, the Federal Union
set out embodying the seeds of certain trouble. The
wiser heads of the Constitutional Convention perceived
this plainly enough; its dissonance to the
logic of their movement; on the sentimental side its
repugnancy; on the practical side its doubtful
economy; and but for the tobacco growers and the
cotton planters it had gone by the board. The
North soon found slave labor unprofitable and rid
itself of slavery. Thus, restricted to the South, it
came to represent in the Southern mind a "right"
which the South was bound to defend.
Mr. Slidell told me in Paris that Louis Napoleon
had once said to him in answer to his urgency for
the recognition of the Southern Confederacy: "I
have talked the matter over with Lord Palmerston
and we are both of the opinion that as long as
African slavery exists at the South, France and
England cannot recognize the Confederacy. They
do not demand its instant abolition. But if you
put it in course of abatement and final abolishment
through a term of years—I do not care how many
—we can intervene to some purpose. As matters
stand we dare not go before a European congress
with such a proposition."
Mr. Slidell passed it up to Richmond. Mr.
Davis passed it on to the generals in the field. The
response he received on every hand was the
statement that it would disorganize and disband the
Confederate Armies. Yet we are told, and it is
doubtless true, that scarcely one Confederate
soldier in ten actually owned a slave.
Thus do imaginings become theories, and theories
resolve themselves into claims; and interests, however
mistaken, rise to the dignity of prerogatives.
The fathers had rather a hazy view of the future.
I was witness to the decline and fall of the old
Whig Party and the rise of the Republican Party.
There was a brief lull in sectional excitement after
the Compromise Measures of 1850, but the
overwhelming defeat of the Whigs in 1852 and the
dominancy of Mr. Jefferson Davis in the cabinet of
Mr. Pierce brought the agitation back again. Mr.
Davis was a follower of Mr. Calhoun—though it
may be doubted whether Mr. Calhoun would ever
have been willing to go to the length of secession
—and Mr. Pierce being by temperament a Southerner
as well as in opinions a pro-slavery Democrat,
his Administration fell under the spell of the
ultra Southern wing of the party. The Kansas-Nebraska
Bill was originally harmless enough, but
the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, which on
Mr. Davis' insistence was made a part of it, let
slip the dogs of war.
In Stephen A. Douglas was found an able and
pliant instrument. Like Clay, Webster and Calhoun
before him, Judge Douglas had the presidential
bee in his bonnet. He thought the South
would, as it could, nominate and elect him
President.
Personally he was a most lovable man—rather
too convivial—and for a while in 1852 it looked as
though he might be the Democratic nominee. His
candidacy was premature, his backers overconfident
and indiscreet.
"I like Douglas and am for him," said Buck
Stone, a member of Congress and delegate to the
National Democratic Convention from Kentucky,
"though I consider him a good deal of a damn
fool." Pressed for a reason he continued: "Why,
think of a man wanting to be President at forty
years of age, and obliged to behave himself for the
rest of his life! I wouldn't take the job on any
such terms."
The proposed repeal of the Missouri
Compromise opened up the slavery debate anew and
gave it increased vitality. Hell literally broke
loose among the political elements. The issues
which had divided Whigs and Democrats went to
the rear, while this one paramount issue took
possession of the stage. It was welcomed by the
extremists of both sections, a very godsend to the
beaten politicians led by Mr. Seward. Rampant
sectionalism was at first kept a little in the
background. There were on either side concealments
and reserves. Many patriotic men put the Union
above slavery or antislavery. But the two sets of
rival extremists had their will at last, and in seven
short years deepened and embittered the contention
to the degree that disunion and war seemed,
certainly proved, the only way out of it.
The extravagance of the debates of those years
amazes the modern reader. Occasionally when I
have occasion to recur to them I am myself
nonplussed, for they did not sound so terrible at the
time. My father was a leader of the Union wing
of the Democratic Party—headed in 1860 the
Douglas presidential ticket in Tennessee—and
remained a Unionist during the War of Sections.
He broke away from Pierce and retired from the
editorship of the Washiongton Union upon the
issue of the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, to
which he was opposed, refusing the appointment
of Governor of Oregon, with which the President
sought to placate him, though it meant his return
to the Senate of the United States in a year or two,
when he and Oregon's delegate in Congress, Gen.
Joseph Lane—the Lane of the Breckenridge and
Lane ticket of 1860—had brought the territory of
Oregon in as a state.
I have often thought just where I would have
come in and what might have happened to me if he
had accepted the appointment and I had grown to
manhood on the Pacific Coast. As it was I attended
a school in Philadelphia—the Protestant
Episcopal Academy—came home to Tennessee in
1856, and after a season with private tutors found
myself back in the national capital in 1858.
It was then that I began to nurse some ambitions
of my own. I was going to be a great man of letters.
I was going to write histories and dramas and
romances and poetry. But as I had set up for
myself I felt in honor bound meanwhile to earn
my own living.
I take it that the early steps of every man to
get a footing may be of interest when fairly told.
I sought work in New York with indifferent success.
Mr. Raymond of the Times, hearing me
play the piano at which from childhood I had
received careful instruction, gave me a job as "musical
critic" during the absence of Mr. Seymour, the
regular critic. I must have done my work
acceptably, since I was not fired. It included a
report of the début of my boy-and-girl companion,
Adelina Patti, when she made her first appearance
in opera at the Academy of Music. But, as the
saying is, I did not "catch on." There might be a
more promising opening in Washington, and
thither I repaired.
The Daily States had been established there by
John P. Heiss, who with Thomas Ritchie had
years before established the Washington Union.
Roger A. Pryor was its nominal editor. But he
soon took himself home to his beloved Virginia and
came to Congress, and the editorial writing on the
States was being done by Col. A. Dudley Mann,
later along Confederate commissioner to France,
preceding Mr. Slidell.
Colonel Mann wished to work incognito. I was
taken on as a kind of go-between and, as I may say,
figurehead, on the strength of being my father's
son and a very self-confident young gentleman,
and began to get my newspaper education in point
of fact as a kind of fetch-and-carry for Major
Heiss. He was a practical newspaper man who
had started the Union at Nashville as well as the
Union at Washington and the Crescent—maybe it
was the Delta—at New Orleans; and for the rudiments
of newspaper work I could scarcely have had
a better teacher.
Back of Colonel Mann as a leader writer on the
States was a remarkable woman. She was Mrs.
Jane Casneau, the wife of Gen. George Casneau,
of Texas, who had a claim before Congress.
Though she was unknown to fame, Thomas A.
Benton used to say that she had more to do with
making and ending the Mexican War than anybody
else.
Somewhere in the early thirties she had gone
with her newly wedded husband, an adventurous
Yankee by the name of Storm, to the Rio Grande
and started a settlement they called Eagle Pass.
Storm died, the Texas outbreak began, and the
young widow was driven back to San Antonio,
where she met and married Casneau, one of Houston's
lieutenants, like herself a New Yorker. She
was sent by Polk with Pillow and Trist to the City
of Mexico and actually wrote the final treaty. It
was she who dubbed William Walker "the little
gray-eyed man of destiny," and put the nickname
"Old Fuss and Feathers" on General Scott, whom
she heartily disliked.
A braver, more intellectual woman never lived.
She must have been a beauty in her youth; was still
very comely at fifty; but a born insurrecto and a
terror with her pen. God made and equipped her
for a filibuster. She possessed infinite knowledge
of Spanish-American affairs, looked like a Spanish
woman, and wrote and spoke the Spanish language
fluently. Her obsession was the bringing of
Central America into the Federal Union. But
she was not without literary aspirations and had
some literary friends. Among these was Mrs.
Southworth, the novelist, who had a lovely home in
Georgetown, and, whatever may be said of her
works and articles, was a lovely woman. She used
to take me to visit this lady. With Major Heiss
she divided my newspaper education, her part of it
being the writing part. Whatever I may have
attained in that line I largely owe to her. She took
great pains with me and mothered me in the
absence of my own mother, who had long been her
very dear friend. To get rid of her, or rather her
pen, Mr. Buchanan gave General Casneau, when
the Douglas schism was breaking out, a Central
American mission, and she and he were lost by
shipwreck on their way to this post, somewhere in
Caribbean waters.
My immediate yokemate on the States was John
Savage, "Jack," as he was commonly called; a
brilliant Irishman, who with Devin Reilley and
John Mitchel and Thomas Francis Meagher, his
intimates, and Joseph Brennan, his brother-in-law,
made a pretty good Irishman of me. They were
'48 men, with literary gifts of one sort and
another, who certainly helped me along with my
writing but, as matters fell out, did not go far enough
to influence my character, for they were a wild lot,
full of taking enthusiasm and juvenile decrepitude
of judgment, ripe for adventures and ready
for any enterprise that promised fun and fighting.
Between John Savage and Mrs. Casneau I had
the constant spur of commendation and assistance
as well as affection. I passed all my spare time in
the Library of Congress and knew its arrangements
at least as well as Mr. Meehan, the librarian,
and Robert Kearon, the assistant, much to the
surprise of Mr. Spofford, who in 1861 succeeded Mr.
Meehan as librarian.
Not long after my return to Washington Col.
John W. Forney picked me up, and I was
employed in addition to my not very arduous duties
on the States to write occasional letters from
Washington to the Philadelphia Press. Good fortune
like ill fortune rarely comes singly. Without anybody's
interposition I was appointed to a clerkship,
a real "sinecure," in the Interior Department by
Jacob Thompson, the secretary, my father's old
colleague in Congress. When the troubles of
1860-61 rose I was literally doing "a land-office
business," with money galore and to spare. Somehow,
I don't know how, I contrived to spend it,
though I had no vices, and worked like a hired man
upon my literary hopes and newspaper obligations.
Life in Washington under these conditions was
delightful. I did not know how my heart was
wrapped up in it until I had to part from it. My
father stood high in public esteem. My mother
was a leader in society. All doors were open to
me. I had many friends. Going back to Tennessee
in the midsummer of 1861, via Pittsburgh and
Cincinnati, there happened a railway break and a halt
of several hours at a village on the Ohio. I strolled
down to the river and sat myself upon the brink,
almost despairing—nigh heartbroken—when I
began to feel an irresistible fascination about the
swift-flowing stream. I leaped to my feet and ran
away; and that is the only thought of suicide that
I can recall.
Mrs. Clay, of Alabama, in her "Belle of the
Fifties" has given a graphic picture of life in the
national capital during the administrations of Pierce
and Buchanan. The South was very much in the
saddle. Pierce, as I have said, was Southern in
temperament, and Buchanan, who to those he did
not like or approve had, as Arnold Harris said, "a
winning way of making himself hateful," was an
aristocrat under Southern and feminine influence.
I was fond of Mr. Pierce, but I could never
endure Mr. Buchanan. His very voice gave offense
to me. Directed by a periodical publication to
make a sketch of him to accompany an engraving,
I did my best on it.
Jacob Thompson, the Secretary of the Interior,
said to me: "Now, Henry, here's your chance for
a foreign appointment."
I now know that my writing was clumsy enough
and my attempt to play the courtier clumsier still.
Nevertheless, as a friend of my father and mother
"Old Buck" might have been a little more considerate
than he was with a lad trying to please and
do him honor. I came away from the White House
my amour propre wounded, and though I had not
far to go went straight into the Douglas camp.
Taking nearly sixty years to think it over I have
reached the conclusion that Mr. Buchanan was the
victim of both personal and historic injustice. With
secession in sight his one aim was to get out of the
White House before the scrap began. He was of
course on terms of intimacy with all the secession
leaders, especially Mr. Slidell, of Louisiana, like
himself a Northerner by birth, and Mr. Mason, a
thick-skulled, ruffle-shirted Virginian. It was not
in him or in Mr. Pierce, with their antecedents and
associations, to be uncompromising Federalists.
There was no clear law to go on. Moderate men
were in a muck of doubt just what to do. With
Horace Greeley Mr. Buchanan was ready to say
"Let the erring sisters go." This indeed was the
extent of Mr. Pierce's pacifism during the War of
Sections.
A new party risen upon the remains of the Whig
Party—the Republican Party—was at the door
and coming into power. Lifelong pro-slavery
Democrats could not look on with equanimity, still
less with complaisance, and doubtless Pierce and
Buchanan to the end of their days thought less of
the Republicans than of the Confederates. As a
consequence Republican writers have given quarter
to neither of them.
It will not do to go too deeply into the account
of those days. The times were out of joint. I
knew of two Confederate generals who first tried
for commissions in the Union Army; gallant and
good fellows too; but they are both dead and their
secret shall die with me. I knew likewise a famous
Union general who was about to resign his
commission in the army to go with the South but was
prevented by his wife, a Northern woman, who had
obtained of Mr. Lincoln a brigadier's commission.
In 1858 a wonderful affair came to pass. It was
Mrs. Senator Gwin's fancy dress ball, written of,
talked of, far and wide. I did not get to attend
this. My costume was prepared—a Spanish
cavalier, Mrs. Casneau's doing—when I fell ill and
had with bitter disappointment to read about it
next day in the papers. I was living at Willard's
Hotel, and one of my volunteer nurses was Mrs.
Daniel E. Sickles, a pretty young thing who was
soon to become the victim of a murder and world
scandal. Her husband was a member of the House
from New York, and during his frequent absences
I used to take her to dinner. Mr. Sickles had been
Mr. Buchanan's Secretary of Legation in London,
and both she and he were at home in the White
House.
She was an innocent child. She never knew what
she was doing, and when a year later Sickles, having
killed her seducer—a handsome, unscrupulous
fellow who understood how to take advantage of
a husband's neglect—forgave her and brought her
home in the face of much obloquy, in my heart of
hearts I did homage to his courage and generosity,
for she was then as he and I both knew a dying
woman. She did die but a few months later. He
was by no means a politician after my fancy or
approval, but to the end of his days I was his friend
and could never bring myself to join in the
repeated public outcries against him.
Early in the fifties Willard's Hotel became a
kind of headquarters for the two political extremes.
During a long time their social intercourse was
unrestrained—often joyous. They were too far
apart, figuratively speaking, to come to blows.
Truth to say, their aims were after all not so far
apart. They played to one another's lead. Many
a time have I seen Keitt, of South Carolina, and
Burlingame, of Massachusetts, hobnob in the liveliest
manner and most public places.
It is certainly true that Brooks was not
himself when he attacked Sumner. The Northern
radicals were wont to say, "Let the South go," the
more profane among them interjecting "to hell!"
The Secessionists liked to prod the New Englanders
with what the South was going to do when they
got to Boston. None of them really meant it—
not even Toombs when he talked about calling the
muster roll of his slaves beneath Bunker Hill
Monument; nor Hammond, the son of a New England
schoolmaster, when he spoke of the "mudsills
of the North," meaning to illustrate what he was
saying by the underpinning of a house built on
marshy ground, and not the Northern work people.
Toombs, who was a rich man, not quite impoverished
by the war, banished himself in Europe for a
number of years. At length he came home, and
passing the White House at Washington he called
and sent his card to the President. General Grant,
the most genial and generous of men, had him come
directly up.
"Mr. President," said Toombs, "in my European
migrations I have made it a rule when arriving in
a city to call first and pay my respects to the Chief
of Police."
The result was a most agreeable hour and an
invitation to dinner. Not long after this at the
hospitable board of a Confederate general, then an
American senator, Toombs began to prod Lamar
about his speech in the House upon the occasion of
the death of Charles Sumner. Lamar was not quick
to quarrel, though when aroused a man of devilish
temper and courage. The subject had become
distasteful to him. He was growing obviously
restive under Toombs' banter. The ladies of the
household apprehending what was coming left the
table.
Then Lamar broke forth. He put Toombs' visit
to Grant, "crawling at the seat of power," against
his eulogy of a dead enemy. I have never heard
such a scoring from one man to another. It was
magisterial in its dignity, deadly in its diction.
Nothing short of a duel could have settled it in the
olden time. But when Lamar, white with rage,
had finished, Toombs without a ruffle said, "Lamar,
you surprise me," and the host, with the rest of us,
took it as a signal to rise from table and rejoin the
ladies in the drawing-room. Of course nothing
came of it.
Toombs was as much a humorist as an extremist.
I have ridden with him under fire and heard him
crack jokes with Minié balls flying uncomfortably
about. Some one spoke kindly of him to old Ben
Wade. "Yes, yes," said Wade; "I never did
believe in the doctrine of total depravity."
But I am running ahead in advance of events.
There came in 1853 to the Thirty-third Congress
a youngish, dapper and graceful man notable as
the only Democrat in the Massachusetts delegation.
It was said that he had been a dancing master, his
wife a work girl. They brought with them a baby
in arms with the wife's sister for its nurse— a
misstep which was quickly corrected. I cannot now
tell just how I came to be very intimate with them
except that they lived at Willard's Hotel. His
name had a pretty sound to it—Nathaniel Prentiss
Banks.
A schoolmate of mine and myself, greatly to the
mirth of those about us, undertook Mr. Banks'
career. We were going to elect him Speaker of
the next House and then President of the United
States. This was particularly laughable to my
mother and Mrs. Linn Boyd, the wife of the
contemporary Speaker, who had very solid presidential
aspirations of his own.
The suggestion perhaps originated with Mrs.
Banks, to whom we two were ardently devoted. I
have not seen her since those days, more than sixty
years ago. But her beauty, which then charmed
me, still lingers in my memory—a gentle, sweet
creature who made much of us boys—and two
years later when Mr. Banks was actually elected
Speaker I was greatly elated and took some of
the credit to myself. Twenty years afterwards
General Banks and I had our seats close together
in the Forty-fourth Congress, and he did not
recall me at all or the episode of 1853. Nevertheless
I warmed to him, and when during Cleveland's first
term he came to me with a hard-luck story I was
glad to throw myself into the breach. He had been
a Speaker of the House, a general in the field and
a Governor of Massachusetts, but was a faded old
man, very commonplace, and except for the little
post he held under Government pitiably helpless.
Colonel George Walton was one of my father's
intimates and an imposing and familiar figure
about Washington. He was the son of a signer of
the Declaration of Independence, a distinction in
those days, had been mayor of Mobile and was an
unending raconteur. To my childish mind he
appeared to know everything that ever had been or
ever would be. He would tell me stories by the
hour and send me to buy him lottery tickets. I
afterward learned that that form of gambling was
his mania. I also learned that many of his stories
were apocryphal or very highly colored.
One of these stories especially took me. It
related how when he was on a yachting cruise in the
Gulf of Mexico the boat was overhauled by pirates,
and how he being the likeliest of the company was
tied up and whipped to make him disgorge, or tell
where the treasure was.
"Colonel Walton," said I, "did the whipping
hurt you much?"
"Sir," he replied, as if I were a grown-up, "they
whipped me until I was perfectly disgusted."
An old lady in Philadelphia, whilst I was at
school, heard me mention Colonel Walton—a most
distinguished, religious old lady—and said to me,
"Henry, my son, you should be ashamed to speak
of that old villain or confess that you ever knew
him," proceeding to give me his awful, blood-curdling
history.
It was mainly a figment of her fancy and
prejudice, and I repeated it to Colonel Walton the
next time I went to the hotel where he was then
living—I have since learned, with a lady not his
wife, though he was then three score and ten—and
he cried, "That old hag! Good Lord! Don't they
ever die!"
Seeing every day the most distinguished public
men of the country, and with many of them brought
into direct acquaintance by the easy intercourse of
hotel life, destroyed any reverence I might have
acquired for official station. Familiarity may not
always breed contempt, but it is a veritable eye
opener. To me no divinity hedged the brow of a
senator. I knew the White House too well to be
impressed by its architectural grandeur without and
rather bizarre furnishments within.
I have declaimed not a little in my time about
the ignoble trade of politics, the collective
dishonesty of parties and the vulgarities of the
self-exploiting professional office hunters. Parties are
parties. Professional politics and politicians are
probably neither worse nor better—barring their
pretensions—than other lines of human endeavor.
The play actor must be agreeable on the stage of
the playhouse; the politician on the highways and
the hustings, which constitute his playhouse—all
the world a stage—neither to be seriously blamed
for the dissimulation which, being an asset, becomes,
as it were, a second nature.
The men who between 1850 and 1861 might have
saved the Union and averted the War of Sections
were on either side professional politicians, with
here and there an unselfish, far-seeing, patriotic
man, whose admonitions were not heeded by the
people ranging on opposing sides of party lines.
The two most potential of the party leaders were
Mr. Davis and Mr. Seward. The South might
have seen and known that the one hope of the
institution of slavery lay in the Union. However it
ended, disunion led to abolition. The world—the
whole trend of modern thought—was set against
slavery. But politics, based on party feeling, is a
game of blindman's buff. And then—here I show
myself a son of Scotland—there is a destiny.
"What is to be," says the predestinarian Mother
Goose, "will be, though it never come to pass."
That was surely the logic of the irrepressible
conflict—only it did come to pass—and for four years
millions of people, the most homogeneous, practical
and intelligent, fought to a finish a fight over a
quiddity; both devoted to liberty, order and law,
neither seeking any real change in the character of
its organic contract.
Human nature remains ever the same. These
days are very like those days. We have had fifty
years of a restored Union. The sectional fires
have quite gone out. Yet behold the schemes of
revolution claiming the regenerative. Most of
them call themselves the "uplift!"
Let us agree at once that all government is more
or less a failure; society as fraudulent as the satirists
describe it; yet, when we turn to the uplift—
particularly the professional uplift—what do we
find but the same old tunes, hypocrisy and empiricism
posing as "friends of the people," preaching
the pussy gospel of "sweetness and light?"
"Words, words, words," says Hamlet. Even as
veteran writers for the press have come through
disheartening experience to a realizing sense of the
futility of printer's ink must our academic pundits
begin to suspect the futility of art and letters.
Words however cleverly writ on paper are after
all but words. "In a nation of blind men," we are
told, "the one-eyed man is king." In a nation of
undiscriminating voters the noise of the agitator is
apt to drown the voice of the statesman. We have
been teaching everybody to read, nobody to think;
and as a consequence—the rule of numbers the
law of the land, partyism in the saddle—legislation,
state and Federal, becomes largely a matter
of riding to hounds and horns. All this, which
was true in the fifties, is true to-day.
Under the pretense of "liberalizing" the Government
the politicians are sacrificing its organic
character to whimsical experimentation; its checks
and balances wisely designed to promote and protect
liberty are being loosened by schemes of reform
more or less visionary; while nowhere do we
find intelligence enlightened by experience, and
conviction supported by self-control, interposing
to save the representative system of the Constitution
from the onward march of the proletariat.
One cynic tells us that "A statesman is a politician
who is dead," and another cynic varies the
epigram to read "A politician out of a job."
Patriotism cries "God give us men," but the parties
say "Give us votes and offices," and Congress proceeds
to create a commission. Thus responsibilities
are shirked and places are multiplied.
Assuming, since many do, that the life of nations
is mortal even as is the life of man—in all things
of growth and decline assimilating—has not our
world reached the top of the acclivity, and pausing
for a moment may it not be about to take the downward
course into another abyss of collapse and
oblivion?
The miracles of electricity the last word of
science, what is left for man to do? With wireless
telegraphy, the airplane and the automobile annihilating
time and space, what else? Turning from the
material to the ethical it seems of the very nature
of the human species to meddle and muddle. On
every hand we see the organization of societies for
making men and women over again according to
certain fantastic images existing in the minds of
the promoters. "Mon Dieu!" exclaimed the visiting
Frenchman. "Fifty religions and only one
soup!" Since then both the soups and the religions
have multiplied until there is scarce a culinary or
moral conception which has not some sect or club to
represent it. The uplift is the keynote of these.
THE INAUGURATION OF LINCOLN—I QUIT WASHINGTON
IT MAY have been Louis the Fifteenth, or it
may have been Madame de Pompadour, who
said, "After me the deluge;" but whichever it was,
very much that thought was in Mr. Buchanan's
mind in 1861 as the time for his exit from the White
House approached. At the North there had been
a political ground-swell; at the South, secession,
half accomplished by the Gulf States, yawned in
the Border States. Curiously enough, very few
believed that war was imminent.
As a reporter for the States I met Mr. Lincoln
immediately on his arrival in Washington. He
came in unexpectedly ahead of the hour announced,
to escape, as was given out, a well-laid plan to
assassinate him as he passed through Baltimore. I
did not believe at the time, and I do not believe
now, that there was any real ground for this
apprehension.
All through that winter there had been a deal of
wild talk. One story had it that Mr. Buchanan was
to be kidnapped and made off with so that Vice
President Breckenridge might succeed and, acting
as de facto President, throw the country into
confusion and revolution, defeating the inauguration
of Lincoln and the coming in of the Republicans.
It was a figment of drink and fancy. There was
never any such scheme. If there had been Breckenridge
would not have consented to be party to it.
He was a man of unusual mental as well as
personal dignity and both temperamentally and
intellectually a thorough conservative.
I had been engaged by Mr. L. A. Gobright, the
agent of what became later the Associated Press,
to help with the report of the inauguration
ceremonies the 4th of March, 1861, and in the discharge
of this duty I kept as close to Mr. Lincoln as I
could get, following after him from the senate
chamber to the east portico of the capitol and standing
by his side whilst he delivered his inaugural
address.
Perhaps I shall not be deemed prolix if I dwell
with some particularity upon an occasion so
historic. I had first encountered the newly elected
President the afternoon of the day in the early
morning of which he had arrived in Washington.
It was a Saturday, I think. He came to the capitol
under the escort of Mr. Seward, and among the
rest I was presented to him. His appearance did
not impress me as fantastically as it had impressed
some others. I was familiar with the Western
type, and whilst Mr. Lincoln was not an Adonis,
even after prairie ideals, there was about him a
dignity that commanded respect.
I met him again the next Monday forenoon in
his apartment at Willard's Hotel as he was
preparing to start to his inauguration, and was struck
by his unaffected kindness, for I came with a matter
requiring his attention. This was, in point of
fact, to get from him a copy of the inauguration
speech for the Associated Press. I turned it over
to Ben Perley Poore, who, like myself, was assisting
Mr. Gobright. The President that was about
to be seemed entirely self-possessed; not a sign of
nervousness, and very obliging. As I have said, I
accompanied the cortège that passed from the
senate chamber to the east portico. When Mr.
Lincoln removed his hat to face the vast throng in
front and below, I extended my hand to take it,
but Judge Douglas, just behind me, reached over
my outstretched arm and received it, holding it
during the delivery of the address. I stood just
near enough the speaker's elbow not to obstruct
any gestures he might make, though he made but
few; and then I began to get a suspicion of the
power of the man.
He delivered that inaugural address as if he had
been delivering inaugural addresses all his life.
Firm, resonant, earnest, it announced the coming
of a man, of a leader of men; and in its tone and
style the gentlemen whom he had invited to become
members of his political family—each of whom
thought himself a bigger man than his chief—might
have heard the voice and seen the hand of one born
to rule. Whether they did or not, they very soon
ascertained the fact. From the hour Abraham Lincoln
crossed the threshold of the White House to
the hour he went thence to his death, there was not
a moment when he did not dominate the political
and military situation and his official subordinates.
The idea that he was overtopped at any time by
anybody is contradicted by all that actually
happened.
I was a young Democrat and of course not in
sympathy with Mr. Lincoln or his opinions. Judge
Douglas, however, had taken the edge off my
hostility. He had said to me upon his return in
triumph to Washington after the famous Illinois
campaign of 1868: "Lincoln is a good man; in fact,
a great man, and by far the ablest debater I have
ever met," and now the newcomer began to verify
this opinion both in his private conversation and in
his public attitude.
I had been an undoubting Union boy. Neither
then nor afterward could I be fairly classified as a
Secessionist. Circumstance rather than conviction
or predilection threw me into the Confederate
service, and, being in, I went through with it.
The secession leaders I held in distrust; especially
Yancey, Mason, Slidell, Benjamin and Iverson,
Jefferson Davis and Isham G. Harris were not
favorites of mine. Later along I came into familiar
association with most of them, and relations were
established which may be described as confidential
and affectionate. Lamar and I were brought
together oddly enough in 1869 by Carl Schurz, and
thenceforward we were the most devoted friends.
Harris and I fell together in 1862 in the field, first
with Forrest and later with Johnston and Hood,
and we remained as brothers to the end, when he
closed a great career in the upper house of
Congress, and by Republican votes, though he was a
Democrat, as president of the Senate.
He continued in the Governorship of Tennessee
through the war. He at no time lost touch with
the Tennessee troops, and though not always in the
field, never missed a forward movement. In
the early spring of 1864, just before the famous
Johnston-Sherman campaign opened, General
Johnston asked him to go around among the boys
and "stir 'em up a bit." The Governor invited me
to ride with him. Together we visited every sector
in the army. Threading the woods of North
Georgia on this round, if I heard it once I heard it
fifty times shouted from a distant clearing: "Here
comes Gov-ner Harris, fellows; g'wine to be a
fight." His appearance at the front had always
preceded and been long ago taken as a signal for
battle.
My being a Washington correspondent of the
Philadelphia Press and having lived since childhood
at Willard's Hotel, where the Camerons also lived,
will furnish the key to my becoming an actual and
active rebel. A few days after the inauguration of
Mr. Lincoln, Colonel Forney came to my quarters
and, having passed the time of day, said: "The
Secretary of War wishes you to be at the department
to-morrow morning as near nine o'clock as
you can make it."
"What does he want, Colonel Forney?" I asked.
"He is going to offer you the position of private
secretary to the Secretary of War, with the rank
of lieutenant colonel, and I am very desirous that
you accept it."
He went away leaving me rather upset. I did
not sleep very soundly that night. "So," I argued
to myself, "it has come to this, that Forney and
Cameron, lifelong enemies, have made friends and
are going to rob the Government—one clerk of the
House, the other Secretary of War—and I, a
mutual choice, am to be the confidential middle
man." I still had a home in Tennessee and I rose
from my bed, resolved to go there.
I did not keep the proposed appointment for
next day. As soon as I could make arrangements
I quitted Washington and went to Tennessee, still
unchanged in my preconceptions. I may add, since
they were verified by events, that I have not
modified them from that day to this.
I could not wholly believe with either extreme.
I had perpetrated no wrong, but in my small way
had done my best for the Union and against secession.
I would go back to my books and my literary
ambitions and let the storm blow over. It could
not last very long; the odds against the South were
too great. Vain hope! As well expect a chip on
the surface of the ocean to lie quiet as a lad of
twenty-one in those days to keep out of one or the
other camp. On reaching home I found myself
alone. The boys were all gone to the front. The
girls were—well, they were all crazy. My native
country was about to be invaded. Propinquity.
Sympathy. So, casting opinions to the winds in I
went on feeling. And that is how I became a rebel,
a case of "first endure and then embrace," because
I soon got to be a pretty good rebel and went the
limit, changing my coat as it were, though not my
better judgment, for with a gray jacket on my
back and ready to do or die, I retained my belief
that secession was treason, that disunion was the
height of folly and that the South was bound to go
down in the unequal strife.
I think now, as an academic proposition, that, in
the doctrine of secession, the secession leaders had
a debatable, if not a logical case; but I also think
that if the Gulf States had been allowed to go out
by tacit consent they would very soon have been
back again seeking readmission to the Union.
Man proposes and God disposes. The ways of
Deity to man are indeed past finding out. Why, the
long and dreadful struggle of a kindred people,
the awful bloodshed and havoc of four weary years,
leaving us at the close measurably where we were
at the beginning, is one of the mysteries which
should prove to us that there is a world hereafter,
since no great creative principle could produce one
with so dire, with so short a span and nothing
beyond.
The change of parties wrought by the presidential
election of 1860 and completed by the coming
in of the Republicans in 1861 was indeed
revolutionary. When Mr. Lincoln had finished his
inaugural address and the crowd on the east portico
began to disperse, I reëntered the rotunda between
Mr. Reverdy Johnson, of Maryland, and Mr. John
Bell, of Tennessee, two old friends of my family,
and for a little we sat upon a bench, they discussing
the speech we had just heard.
Both were sure there would be no war. All
would be well, they thought, each speaking kindly
of Mr. Lincoln. They were among the most
eminent men of the time, I a boy of twenty-one;
but to me war seemed a certainty. Recalling the
episode, I have often realized how the intuitions of
youth outwit the wisdom and baffle the experience
of age.
I at once resigned my snug sinecure in the
Interior Department and, closing my accounts of
every sort, was presently ready to turn my back
upon Washington and seek adventures elsewhere.
They met me halfway and came in plenty. I
tried staff duty with General Polk, who was making
an expedition into Western Kentucky. In a
few weeks illness drove me into Nashville, where I
passed the next winter in desultory newspaper
work. Then Nashville fell, and, as I was making
my way out of town afoot and trudging the
Murfreesboro pike, Forrest, with his squadron just
escaped from Fort Donelson, came thundering by,
and I leaped into an empty saddle. A few days
later Forrest, promoted to brigadier general,
attached me to his staff, and the next six months it
was mainly guerilla service, very much to my liking.
But Fate, if not Nature, had decided that I was a
better writer than fighter, and the Bank of
Tennessee having bought a newspaper outfit at
Chattanooga, I was sent there to edit The Rebel—my own
naming—established as the organ of the Tennessee
state government. I made it the organ of the
army.
It is not the purpose of these pages to retell the
well-known story of the war. My life became a
series of ups and downs—mainly downs—the word
being from day to day to fire and fall back; in
the Johnston-Sherman campaign, I served as
chief of scouts; then as an aid to General Hood
through the siege of Atlanta, sharing the beginning
of the chapter of disasters that befell that gallant
soldier and his army. I was spared the last and
worst of these by a curious piece of special duty,
taking me elsewhere, to which I was assigned in
the autumn of 1864 by the Confederate government.
This involved a foreign journey. It was no
less than to go to England to sell to English buyers
some hundred thousand bales of designated cotton
to be thus rescued from spoilation, acting under
the supervision and indeed the orders of the
Confederate fiscal agency at Liverpool.
Of course I was ripe for this; but it proved a
bigger job than I had conceived or dreamed. The
initial step was to get out of the country. But
how? That was the question. To run the blockade
had been easy enough a few months earlier. All
our ports were now sealed by Federal cruisers and
gunboats. There was nothing for it but to slip
through the North and to get either a New York or
a Canadian boat. This involved chances and
disguises.
In West Tennessee, not far from Memphis,
lived an aunt of mine. Thither I repaired. My
plan was to get on a Mississippi steamer calling at
one of the landings for wood. This proved
impracticable. I wandered many days and nights,
rather ill mounted, in search of some kind—any
kind—of exit, when one afternoon, quite worn out,
I sat by a log heap in a comfortable farmhouse. It
seemed that I was at the end of my tether; I did
not know what to do.
Presently there was an arrival—a brisk gentleman
right out of Memphis, which I then learned
was only ten miles distant—bringing with him a
morning paper. In this I saw appended to various
army orders the name of "N. B. Dana, General
Commanding."
That set me to thinking. Was not Dana the
name of a certain captain, a stepson of Congressman
Peaslee, of New Hampshire, who had lived
with us at Willard's Hotel—and were there not
two children, Charley and Mamie, and a dear little
mother, and—I had been listening to the talk
of the newcomer. He was a licensed cotton buyer
with a pass to come and go at will through the
lines, and was returning next day.
"I want to get into Memphis—I am a nephew of
Mrs. General Dana. Can you take me in?" I said
to this person.
After some hesitation he consented to try, it
being agreed that my mount and outfit should be
his if he got me through; no trade if he failed.
Clearly the way ahead was brightening. I soon
ascertained that I was with friends, loyal
Confederates. Then I told them who I was, and all
became excitement for the next day's adventure.
We drove down to the Federal outpost. Crenshaw—
that was the name of the cotton buyer—
showed his pass to the officer in command, who
then turned to me. "Captain," I said, "I have no
pass, but I am a nephew of Mrs. General Dana.
Can you not pass me in without a pass?" He was
very polite. It was a chain picket, he said; his
orders were very strict, and so on.
"Well," I said, "suppose I were a member of
your own command and were run in here by
guerillas. What do you think would it be your
duty to do?"
"In that case," he answered, "I should send you
to headquarters with a guard."
"Good!" said I. "Can't you send me to headquarters
with a guard?"
He thought a moment. Then he called a cavalryman
from the outpost.
"Britton," he said, "show this gentleman in to
General Dana's headquarters."
Crenshaw lashed his horse and away we went.
"That boy thinks he is a guide, not a guard," said
he. "You are all right. We can easily get rid of
him."
This proved true. We stopped by a saloon and
bought a bottle of whisky. When we reached
headquarters the lad said, "Do you gentlemen want me
any more?" We did not. Then we gave him the
bottle of whisky and he disappeared round the
corner. "Now you are safe," said Crenshaw. "Make
tracks."
But as I turned away and out of sight I began
to consider the situation. Suppose that picket on
the outpost reported to the provost marshal general
that he had passed a relative of Mrs. Dana? What
then? Provost guard. Drumhead court-martial.
Shot at daylight. It seemed best to play out the
hand as I had dealt it. After all, I could make a
case if I faced it out.
The guard at the door refused me access to
General Dana. Driven by a nearby hackman to the
General's residence, and, boldly asking for Mrs.
Dana, I was more successful. I introduced myself
as a teacher of music seeking to return to my
friends in the North, working in a word about the
old Washington days, not forgetting "Charley"
and "Mamie." The dear little woman was heartily
responsive. Both were there, including a pretty
girl from Philadelphia, and she called them down.
"Here is your old friend, Henry Waterman," she
joyfully exclaimed. Then guests began to arrive.
It was a reception evening. My hope fell. Some
one would surely recognize me. Presently a
gentleman entered, and Mrs. Dana said: "Colonel Meehan,
this is my particular friend, Henry Waterman,
who has been teaching music out in the country,
and wants to go up the river. You will give him a
pass, I am sure." It was the provost marshal, who
answered, "certainly." Now was my time for
disappearing. But Mrs. Dana would not listen to this.
General Dana would never forgive her if she let
me go. Besides, there was to be a supper and a
dance. I sat down again very much disconcerted.
The situation was becoming awkward. Then Mrs.
Dana spoke. "You say you have been teaching
music. What is your instrument?" Saved! "The
piano," I answered. The girls escorted me to the
rear drawing-room. It was a new Steinway Grand,
just set up, and I played for my life. If the black
bombazine covering my gray uniform did not
break, all would be well. I was having a delightfully
good time, the girls on either hand, when
Mrs. Dana, still enthusiastic, ran in and said,
"General Dana is here. Remembers you perfectly.
Come and see him."
He stood by a table, tall, sardonic, and as I
approached he put out his hand and said: "You have
grown a bit, Henry, my boy, since I saw you last.
How did you leave my friend Forrest?"
I was about making some awkward reply, when,
the room already filling up, he said:
"We have some friends for supper. I am glad
you are here. Mamie, my daughter, take Mr.
Watterson to the table!"
Lord! That supper! Canvasback! Terrapin!
Champagne! The general had seated me at his
right. Somewhere toward the close those expressive
gray eyes looked at me keenly, and across his
wine glass he said:
"I think I understand this. You want to get up
the river. You want to see your mother. Have
you money enough to carry you through? If you
have not don't hesitate, for whatever you need I
will gladly let you have."
I thanked him. I had quite enough. All was
well. We had more music and some dancing. At
a late hour he called the provost marshal.
"Meehan," said he, "take this dangerous young
rebel round to the hotel, register him as Smith,
Brown, or something, and send him with a pass up
the river by the first steamer." I was in luck, was
I not?
But I made no impression on those girls. Many
years after, meeting Mamie Dana, as the wife of an
army officer at Fortress Monroe, I related the
Memphis incident. She did not in the least recall it.
I had one other adventure during the war that
may be worth telling. It was in 1862. Forrest
took it into his inexperienced fighting head to make
a cavalry attack upon a Federal stockade, and,
repulsed with considerable loss, the command had to
disperse—there were not more than two hundred
of us—in order to escape capture by the
newly-arrived reinforcements that swarmed about. We
were to rendezvous later at a certain point. Having
some time to spare, and being near the family
homestead at Beech Grove, I put in there.
It was midnight when I reached my destination.
I had been erroneously informed that the Union
Army was on the retreat—quite gone from the
neighborhood; and next day, believing the coast
was clear, I donned a summer suit and with a
neighbor boy who had been wounded at Shiloh and
invalided home, rode over to visit some young ladies.
We had scarcely been welcomed and were taking a
glass of wine when, looking across the lawn, we
saw that the place was being surrounded by a body
of blue-coats. The story of their departure had
been a mistake. They were not all gone.
There was no chance of escape. We were placed
in a hollow square and marched across country into
camp. Before we got there I had ascertained that
they were Indianians, and I was further led rightly
to surmise what we called in 1860 Douglas
Democrats.
My companion, a husky fellow, who looked and
was every inch a soldier, was first questioned by the
colonel in command. His examination was brief.
He said he was as good a rebel as lived, that he was
only waiting for his wound to heal to get back into
the Confederate Army, and that if they wanted to
hang him for a spy to go ahead.
I was aghast. It was not he that was in danger
of hanging, but myself, a soldier in citizen's apparel
within the enemy's lines. The colonel turned to
me. With what I took for a sneer he said:
"I suppose you are a good Union man?" This
offered me a chance.
"That depends upon what you call a good Union
man," I answered. "I used to be a very good
Union man—a Douglas Democrat—and I am not
conscious of having changed my political opinions."
That softened him and we had an old-fashioned,
friendly talk about the situation, in which I kept
the Douglas Democratic end of it well to the fore.
He, too, had been a Douglas Democrat. I soon
saw that it was my companion and not myself whom
they were after. Presently Colonel Shook, that
being the commandant's name, went into the
adjacent stockade and the boys about began to be
hearty and sympathetic. I made them a regular
Douglas Democratic speech. They brought some
"red licker" and I asked for some sugar for a toddy,
not failing to cite the familiar Sut Lovingood saying
that "there were about seventeen round the door
who said they'd take sugar in their'n." The drink
warmed me to my work, making me quicker, if not
bolder, in invention. Then the colonel not
reappearing as soon as I hoped he would, for all along
my fear was the wires, I went to him.
"Colonel Shook," I said, "you need not bother
about this friend of mine. He has no real idea of
returning to the Confederate service. He is teaching
school over here at Beech Grove and engaged
to be married to one of the—girls. If you carry
him off a prisoner he will be exchanged back into
the fighting line, and we make nothing by it. There
is a hot luncheon waiting for us at the—'s. Leave
him to me and I will be answerable." Then I left
him.
Directly he came out and said: "I may be doing
wrong, and don't feel entirely sure of my ground,
but I am going to let you gentlemen go."
We thanked him and made off amid the cheery
good-bys of the assembled blue-coats.
No lunch for us. We got to our horses, rode
away, and that night I was at our rendezvous to
tell the tale to those of my comrades who had
arrived before me.
Colonel Shook and I met after the war at a
Grand Army reunion where I was billed to speak
and to which he introduced me, relating the incident
and saying, among other things: "I do believe
that when he told me near Wartrace that day
twenty years ago that he was a good Union man he
told at least half the truth."
I GO TO LONDON—AM INTRODUCED TO A NOTABLE SET
THE fall of Atlanta after a siege of nearly
two months was, in the opinion of thoughtful
people, the sure precursor of the fall of the doomed
Confederacy. I had an affectionate regard for
General Hood, but it was my belief that neither
he nor any other soldier could save the day, and
being out of commission and having no mind for
what I conceived aimless campaigning through another
winter—especially an advance into Tennessee
upon Nashville—I wrote to an old friend of
mine, who owned the Montgomery Mail, asking
for a job. He answered that if I would come right
along and take the editorship of the paper he would
make me a present of half of it—a proposal so
opportune and tempting that forty-eight hours later
saw me in the capital of Alabama.
I was accompanied by my fidus Achates, Albert
Roberts. The morning after our arrival, by chance
I came across a printed line which advertised a room
and board for two "single gentlemen," with the
curious affix for those times, "references will be
given and required." This latter caught me.
When I rang the visitors' bell of a pretty dwelling
upon one of the nearby streets a distinguished
gentleman in uniform came to the door, and,
acquainted with my business, he said, "Ah, that is an
affair of my wife," and invited me within.
He was obviously English. Presently there
appeared a beautiful lady, likewise English and as
obviously a gentlewoman, and an hour later my
friend Roberts and I moved in. The incident
proved in many ways fateful. The military gentleman
proved to be Doctor Scott, the post surgeon.
He was, when we came to know him, the
most interesting of men, a son of that Captain
Scott who commanded Byron's flagship at Missolonghi
in 1823; had as a lad attended the poet and he
in his last illness and been in at the death, seeing
the club foot when the body was prepared for burial.
His wife was adorable. There were two girls and
two boys. To make a long story short, Albert Roberts
married one of the daughters, his brother the
other; the lads growing up to be successful and
distinguished men—one a naval admiral, the other a
railway president. When, just after the war, I
was going abroad, Mrs. Scott said: "I have a
brother living in London to whom I will be glad
to give you a letter."
Upon the deck of the steamer bound from New
York to London direct, as we, my wife and I newly
married, were taking a last look at the receding
American shore, there appeared a gentleman who
seemed by the cut of his jib startlingly French. We
had under our escort a French governess returning
to Paris. In a twinkle she and this gentleman had
struck up an acquaintance, and much to my
displeasure she introduced him to me as "Monsieur
Mahoney." I was somewhat mollified when later
we were made acquainted with Madame Mahoney.
I was not at all preconceived in his favor, nor did
Monsieur Mahoney, upon nearer approach, conciliate
my simple taste. In person, manners and
apparel he was quite beyond me. Mrs. Mahoney,
however, as we soon called her, was a dear, whole-souled,
traveled, unaffected New England woman.
But Monsieur! Lord! There was no holding him
at arm's length. He brooked not resistance. I was
wearing a full beard. He said it would never do,
carried me perforce below, and cut it as I have worn
it ever since. The day before we were to dock he
took me aside and said:
"Mee young friend"—he had a brogue which
thirty years in Algiers, where he had been consul,
and a dozen in Paris as a gentleman of leisure, had
not wholly spoiled—"Mee young friend, I observe
that you are shy of strangers, but my wife and I
have taken a shine to you and the 'Princess'," as
he called Mrs. Watterson, "and if you will allow
us, we can be of some sarvis to you when we get to
town."
Certainly there was no help for it. I was too ill
of the long crossing to oppose him. At Blackwall
we took the High Level for Fenchurch Street, at
Fenchurch Street a cab for the West End—Mr.
Mahoney bossing the job—and finally, in most
comfortable and inexpensive lodgings, we were
settled in Jermyn Street. The Mahoneys were
visiting Lady Elmore, widow of a famous surgeon
and mother of the President of the Royal Academy.
Thus we were introduced to quite a distinguished
artistic set.
It was great. It was glorious. At last we were
in London—the dream of my literary ambitions. I
have since lived much in this wondrous city and in
many parts of it between Hyde Park Corner, the
heart of May Fair, to the east end of Bloomsbury
under the very sound of Bow Bells. All the way as
it were from Tyburn Tree that was, and the Marble
Arch that is, to Charing Cross and the Hay
Market. This were not to mention casual sojourns
along Piccadilly and the Strand.
In childhood I was obsessed by the immensity,
the atmosphere and the mystery of London. Its
nomenclature embedded itself in my fancy; Hounsditch
and Shoreditch, Billingsgate and Blackfriars;
Bishopgate, within, and Bishopgate, without;
Threadneedle Street and Wapping-Old-Stairs;
the Inns of Court where Jarndyce struggled with
Jarndyce, and the taverns where the Mark
Tapleys, the Captain Costigans and the Dolly
Vardens consorted.
Alike in winter fog and summer haze, I grew to
know and love it, and those that may be called its
dramatis personae, especially its tatterdemalions,
the long procession led by Jack Sheppard, Dick
Turpin and Jonathan Wild the Great. Inevitably
I sought their haunts—and they were not all gone
in those days; the Bull-and-Gate in Holborn,
whither Mr. Tom Jones repaired on his arrival in
town, and the White Hart Tavern, where Mr.
Pickwick fell in with Mr. Sam Weller; the regions
about Leicester Fields and Russell Square sacred
to the memory of Captain Booth and the lovely
Amelia and Becky Sharp; where Garrick drank
tea with Dr. Johnson and Henry Esmond tippled
with Sir Richard Steele. There was yet a Pump
Court, and many places along Oxford Street where
Mantalini and De Quincy loitered: and Covent
Garden and Drury Lane. Evans' Coffee House,
or shall I say the Cave of Harmony, and The Cock
and the Cheshire Cheese were near at hand for
refreshment in the agreeable society of Daniel Defoe
and Joseph Addison, with Oliver Goldsmith and
Dick Swiveller and Colonel Newcome to clink
ghostly glasses amid the punch fumes and tobacco
smoke. In short I knew London when it was still
Old London—the knowledge of Temple Bar and
Cheapside—before the vandal horde of progress
and the pickaxe of the builder had got in their
nefarious work.
Not long after we began our sojourn in London,
I recurred—by chance, I am ashamed to say—to
Mrs. Scott's letter of introduction to her brother.
The address read "Mr. Thomas H. Huxley, School
of Mines, Jermyn Street." Why, it was but two or
three blocks away, and being so near I called, not
knowing just who Mr. Thomas H. Huxley might
be.
I was conducted to a dark, stuffy little room.
The gentleman who met me was exceedingly handsome
and very agreeable. He greeted me cordially
and we had some talk about his relatives in America.
Of course my wife and I were invited at once
to dinner. I was a little perplexed. There was no
one to t
QUINCY ADAMS AND ANDREW JACKSON—JAMES
K. POLK AND FRANKLIN PIERCE—JACK DADE
AND "BEAU HICKMAN"—OLD TIMES IN OLD
WASHINGTON
I
Page 16
Keep something to yourself,
Ye scarcely tell to ony,
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19II
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23III
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28IV
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33V
Page 34
Page 35VI
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38VII
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44VIII
Page 45
Page 46
HENRY CLAY—PAINTED AT ASHLAND BY DODGE FOR
THE HON. ANDREW EWING OF TENNESSEE—THE
ORIGINAL HANGS IN MR. WATTERSON'S LIBRARY
AT "MANSFIELD"
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49CHAPTER THE SECOND
WHIG PARTY AND RISE OF THE REPUBLICAN—
THE SICKLES TRAGEDY—BROOKS AND SUMNER
—LIFE AT WASHINGTON IN THE FIFTIES
I
Page 50
Page 51II
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54III
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60IV
Page 61
Page 62V
Page 63
Page 64
W. P. HARDEE, LIEUTENANT GENERAL C.S.A.
Page 65
Page 66VI
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70VII
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75CHAPTER THE THIRD
AND RETURN TO TENNESSEE—A RUN-ABOUT
WITH FORREST—THROUGH THE FEDERAL
LINES AND A DANGEROUS ADVENTURE—GOOD
LUCK AT MEMPHIS
I
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79II
Page 80
JOHN BELL OF TENNESSEE—IN 1860 PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE "UNION PARTY"—"BELL AND EVERETT" TICKET
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83III
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86IV
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92V
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97CHAPTER THE FOURTH
—HUXLEY, SPENCER, MILL AND TYNDALL—
ARTEMUS WARD COMES TO TOWN—THE SAVAGE
CLUB.
I
Page 98
Page 99II
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103III