<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite.dtd" [
<!ENTITY % external-entities SYSTEM "./extEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY % internal-entities SYSTEM "./intEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY prestcv SYSTEM "prestcv.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY presttp SYSTEM "presttp.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
]>
<TEI.2>
  <teiHeader type="" status="new">
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title><emph>Address of Hon. John S. Preston, Commissioner from South Carolina, to 
the Convention of Virginia, February 19, 1861:</emph>Electronic Edition.</title>
        <author>Preston, John S. (John Smith), 1809-1881. </author>
        <funder>Funding from the Institute of Museum and Library
 Services supported the electronic publication of this title.</funder>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text scanned (OCR) by</resp>
          <name id="cg">Elizabeth Wright</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Images scanned by</resp>
          <name>Elizabeth Wright</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
          <name id="ns">Christie Mawhinney  and Natalia Smith</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <editionStmt>
        <edition>First edition, <date>2000</date></edition>
      </editionStmt>
      <extent>ca.     60K</extent>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>Academic Affairs Library, UNC-CH</publisher>
        <pubPlace>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, </pubPlace>
        <date>2000.</date>
        <availability status="unknown">
          <p>© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina 
at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching and personal
 use as long as this statement of availability is included in the text.</p>
        </availability>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <biblFull>
          <titleStmt>
            <title type="title page"> Address of Hon, John S. Preston, Commissioner from South 
Carolina, to the Convention of Virginia, February 19, 1864.</title>
            <author>Hon. John S. Preston</author>
          </titleStmt>
          <extent>24 p.</extent>
          <publicationStmt>
            <pubPlace>Columbia, S. C.</pubPlace>
            <publisher>Steam Power-Press of R. W. Gibbes</publisher>
            <date>1861</date>
            <authority/>
          </publicationStmt>
          <notesStmt>
            <note anchored="yes">Call number 2825.1 Conf. (Rare Book Collection, University of North Carolina 
at Chapel Hill)</note>
          </notesStmt>
        </biblFull>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <projectDesc>
        <p>The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-CH
digitization project, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South.</hi></p>
      </projectDesc>
      <editorialDecl>
        <p>Any hyphens occurring in line breaks have been 
removed, and the trailing part of a word has been joined to 
the preceding line.</p>
        <p>All quotation marks, em dashes  and ampersand have been transcribed as
entity references.</p>
        <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as ” and “
respectively.</p>
        <p>All single right and left quotation marks are encoded as ’ and ‘ respectively.</p>
        <p>All em dashes are encoded as —</p>
        <p>Indentation in lines has not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Spell-check and verification made against printed text using Author/Editor (SoftQuad) and 
Microsoft Word spell check programs.</p>
      </editorialDecl>
      <classDecl>
        <taxonomy id="lcsh">
          <bibl>
            <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings, </title>
            <edition>21st edition, 1998</edition>
          </bibl>
        </taxonomy>
      </classDecl>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <langUsage>
        <language id="eng">English</language>
      </langUsage>
      <textClass>
        <keywords scheme="lcsh">
          <list type="simple">
            <item>Virginia State Convention of 1861 (Richmond, Va.)</item>
            <item>Secession -- Georgia.</item>
            <item>Secession -- Virginia.</item>
            <item>Secession -- Southern States.</item>
            <item>Virginia -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865.</item>
            <item>Virginia -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865.</item>
            <item>United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865.</item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change>
        <date>2000-10-12, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Celine Noel and Wanda Gunther </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> revised TEIHeader and created catalog 
record for the electronic edition.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>2000-06-02, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Natalia Smith, </name>
          <resp>project manager, </resp>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished TEI-conformant encoding and final proofing.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>2000-06-01, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Christie Mawhinney</name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> finished TEI/SGML encoding</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>2000-01-29, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Elizabeth Wright</name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> finished scanning (OCR) and proofing.</item>
      </change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <front>
      <div1 type="cover image">
        <p>
          <figure id="cover" entity="prestcv">
            <p>[Cover Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="title page image">
        <p>
          <figure id="title" entity="presttp">
            <p>[Title Page Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <titlePage>
        <docTitle>
          <titlePart type="main">ADDRESS<lb/>
OF<lb/>
HON. JOHN S. PRESTON,<lb/>
COMMISSIONER FROM SOUTH CAROLINA, <lb/>To the Convention of Virginia, February 19, 1861.</titlePart>
        </docTitle>
        <docImprint><pubPlace>COLUMBIA, S. C.:</pubPlace>
<publisher>STEAM POWER-PRESS OF R. W. GIBBES.</publisher>
<docDate>1861.</docDate></docImprint>
      </titlePage>
    </front>
    <body>
      <div1 type="main text">
        <pb id="prest3" n="3"/>
        <head>ADDRESS.</head>
        <opener>
          <salute>
            <hi rend="italics">Mr. President and Gentlemen of Virginia:</hi>
          </salute>
        </opener>
        <p>I have the honor to present to you my credentials as Commissioner
from the Government of South Carolina to the Convention
of the people of Virginia. On these credentials being
duly received by you, I am instructed by my Government to
lay before you the causes which induced the State of South
Carolina to withdraw from the United States, and resume the
powers heretofore delegated by her to the Government of the
United States of America.</p>
        <p>In performing this duty, I desire to announce to you that it
is no part of my purpose, nor is it the wish of my Government,
that I should make an argument before you in proof of
the right of secession. My Government has assumed that
right in her sovereign capacity, and my ministry here is to
recite the causes which that Government has deemed sufficient
to enforce upon her the necessity of exercising that right.</p>
        <p>It will be sufficient for me to recall to your consideration a
few historical facts, bearing upon the relations of the States
composing the late American Confederation. You will remember
that the American Colonies of Great Britain, save by
contiguity of territory, had no nearer community of Government
than they had with the Colonies of the East Indies.
They were united in the Crown of Great Britain, and when
that union was dissolved, each Colony was remitted to its own
ministry, as completely as if they were in different regions of
the Empire. Being adjacent, and having identical grievances,
they met and consulted at different times and places, in various
forms of convention, but generally in Congress, as of acknowledged
independent powers. They began the war with the
<pb id="prest4" n="4"/>
mother country—each Colony for itself—and the battles of
Lexington and Bunker Hill in Massachusetts, and of Fort
Moultrie in South Carolina, and the burning of Norfolk in
Virginia, preceded the declaration of the 4th of July, 1776.
The Colonies then in Congress, on that day, declared themselves
free and independent States, and proceeded to act as
such in forming alliances with each other for their common
defence against the power from which they had absolved
themselves. They also instantly, and severally, began to form
independent civil organizations. When these were completed
as efficiently as circumstances would allow, and manifested by
their separate contributions to the common cause, as sovereign
and independent powers they formed a compact, in which this
sovereignty and independence were expressly declared. As
you may remember, gentlemen—for I am now reciting what
is present to your memory, with a view to bring it to your
consideration, trusting, as I may recite it, you will discover
what has been certainly running through the minds of my
people for years past—finding that, individually, they could
not carry on this contest for independence and sovereignty,
they united in certain articles, which are known as the Articles
of Confederation. In these articles there is the reiteration
of the original declaration of the sovereignty and independence
of the parties to it. All rights, all powers, all jurisdiction,
therein delegated, produce no limitation upon the ultimate
and discretionary sovereignty of the parties to it. In the subsequent
treaty with Great Britain, that Government recognized
the agency of the Confederation, but acknowledged the
States—severally, by name—as sovereign and independent
States. Four years later, the sovereign parties became dissatisfied
with the league, on account of alleged inefficiency in
regard to interests which were common and identical. The
States virtually resumed their original status of segregation,
and the remedies proposed for the inefficiency of the Articles
of Confederation resulted in the new compact, under the name
of the Constitution of the United States and the Amendments
<pb id="prest5" n="5"/>
thereto, proposed by the States individually. In this instrument
there is not one word or phrase capable of being construed
into a lapse or prescription of the sovereignty and
independence of the contracting powers. On the contrary,
there is an express, pervading and emphatic reservation of all
powers not expressly granted. The whole spirit and genius of
that Constitution recognizes the sovereignty of the States, and
its own mere agency in the exercise of deputed and limited
functions. The States—separately, individually, independently—
with various reservations, and at different periods of
time, consented to this contract. Nothing legitimate has since
occurred to change their relations to each other under this contract.
On the contrary, the contemporaneous and juxta-contemporaneous
construction, especially that of Virginia by Mr.
Madison, characterized by your distinguished President the
chief framer of the Constitution, declares that “the Constitution
of the United States was formed by the sanction of the
States, given by each in its sovereign capacity.<milestone n="****" unit="typography"/>
The States, then, being the parties to the constitutional compact,
and in their sovereign capacity, it follows, of necessity,
that there can be no tribunal above their authority, to decide
in the last resort whether the compact made by them be violated;
and, consequently, as parties to it, they must themselves
decide, in the last resort, such questions as may be of sufficient
magnitude to require their interposition.” By questions of
“sufficient magnitude,” the interpreter means those questions
which involve the prerogative of that sovereignty itself, and
those which are of sufficient magnitude to require its interposition,
and such as are of themselves dangerous to the great
purposes for which the Constitution was established; and
among these great purposes we know there is expressed those
of justice, right, equality, general welfare, and the blessings of
liberty to us and our posterity.</p>
        <p>On this relation of the States to each other, and to the Confederation
formed by them, the people of South Carolina, then,
assume that their sovereignty has never been divided; that it
<pb id="prest6" n="6"/>
has never been alienated, and that it is imprescriptible. That
it has not been impaired, by the fact that they have voluntarily
refrained from the exercise of certain specified functions,
and that it may be exercised at their will through their own
established forms. They, therefore, contend that, in the exercise
of their unrestricted sovereignty, and on the great principle
of the right of a sovereign State to govern itself, even
when it involves the destruction of a compact which has been
vitiated so as to become an imminent danger, they have the
right to abrogate that compact, so far as concerns themselves,
because it is dangerous to their happiness, liberty and safety.</p>
        <p>Having ventured to present these facts and principles to
your consideration, I will proceed to state the more prominent
and immediate causes which have induced South Carolina to
abrogate her consent to the Constitution of the United States.</p>
        <p>As preliminary to this statement, I would say, that, as early
as the year 1820, the manifest tendency of the legislation of
the General Government was to restrict the territorial expansion
of the slaveholding States. This is very evident in
all the contests of that period; and had they been successful
to the extent that some hoped, even then the line that cut off
the purchase from France might have been projected eastward
to the bottom of the Chesapeake, and sent Virginia and half
of Tennessee, and all of Kentucky, (Virginia proper,) after
she had given to non-slavery her north-western empire, to the
non-slavery section. That might be the line. The policy,
however, has been pushed so far as to deprive this Southern
section of that line of at least seven tenths of the acquisitions
of the Government. Besides this, I would state, as preliminary,
that a large portion of the revenue of the Government
of the United States has always been drawn from duties on
imports. Now, the products that have been necessary to
purchase these imports, were at one time almost exclusively,
and have always mainly been, the result of slave labor, and,
therefore, the burden of the revenue duties upon imports purchased
by these exports must fall upon the producer, who
<pb id="prest7" n="7"/>
happens, in this case, also to be the consumer of the imports.</p>
        <p>In addition to this, it may be stated, that at a very early
period of the existence of this Government, the Northern
people, from a variety of causes, entered upon the industries
of manufacture and of commerce, but of agriculture scarcely
to the extent of self-support. This may have arisen from a
variety of causes: among them, perhaps, an uncongenial
climate, a barren soil, but a sea-coast adapted to commerce,
besides an inherent tendency upon the part of the people of
these latitudes to the arts of manucraft and traffic. And while,
therefore, it was important that all the sources of the revenue
should be kept up to meet the increasing expenses of the Government,
it also manifestly became of great importance that
these articles of manufacture in which they have been engaged
should be subject to the purchase of their confederates. They,
therefore, invented a system of duties, partial and discriminating,
by which the whole burden of the revenue fell upon
those who produced the articles of export which purchased
the articles of import, and which articles of import were consumed
mainly, or to a great extent, by those who produced
the exports.</p>
        <p>The State of South Carolina, being at the time one of the
largest exporters and consumers of imports, was so oppressed
by the operations of this system upon her, that she was driven
to the necessity of interposing her sovereign reservation to
arrest it, so far as she was concerned. This interposition,
together with the rapid spread of the principle of free trade
all over the world, did arrest the iniquity in the shape in
which it was then presented. It could no longer be the
avowed policy of the Government to tax one section for the
purpose of building up another. But so successful had been
the system—to such an extent had it already, in a few years,
been pushed—so vast had been its accumulations of capital—
so vastly had it been diffused throughout its ramifications—as
seemingly to interweave the industries of the sections almost
<pb id="prest8" n="8"/>
into the life of each other. As mechanics, manufacturers,
shippers, merchants, bankers, and in all the intermediary pursuits,
the Northern people seem to have become almost necessary
to the maintenance of the industry of the South. In
these relations they had crept into every crevice of an affluent
and loose economy, and made themselves so convenient to it,
that we began to think them vital to it; and they grew so
great and waxed so strong, as they fed and fattened on this
sweating giant of the South, that, with the insolence natural
to sudden and bloated power, they began to claim that the
laboring monster was created for their tributary.</p>
        <p>They have drawn from us subsidies which might have
glutted the avarice of a Roman proconsul, which, in one
quarter of a century, have builded up countless cities, rivaling
in wealth the richest marts of the old world, and burdening
every sea with their commerce, and which have covered their
granite soil with palaces and smiling gardens. And yet,
strange, anomalous as it may appear, it is nevertheless literally
true, that while they were thus gathering all their wealth and
power from this source, step by step, <hi rend="italics">latus cum latere</hi>, with
this aggregation there was growing up a determined purpose
to destroy these sources of their power and grandeur. I
pretend not to explain it; I relate it as history. This, gentlemen,
brings me to the proximate causes which it is my mission
to lay before you.</p>
        <p>For nearly thirty years, the people of the non-slaveholding
States have assailed the institution of African slavery, in
every form in which our political connection with them permitted
them to approach it. During all that period, large
masses of their people, with a persistent fury, maddened by
the intoxication of the wildest fanaticism, have associated,
with the avowed purpose of effecting the abolition of slavery
by the most fearful means which can be suggested to a subject
race: arson and murder are the charities of their programme.</p>
        <p>1. The representatives of these people in the Federal Legislature,
acting on the same ultimate idea, have endeavored to
<pb id="prest9" n="9"/>
shape the legislation of the Government so as to deprive the
slave States of political equality, by excluding them from all
interest in the territorial accretions of the Government. They
have succeeded to the full extent, and have decreed that there
shall be no more slave States admitted to the Union.</p>
        <p>2. A majority of the non-slaveholding States have not only
refused to carry out the provisions of the Constitution and
laws to protect slave property, but have made stringent laws
to prevent the execution of those provisions.</p>
        <p>3. Eight of those States have made it a criminal offence to
execute the plainest provisions of the Constitution which give
protection to a property furnishing $250,000,000, annually, to
the commerce of the country, and on which rests the entire
order of civilization of twelve millions of people. In not one
of the seventeen non-slaveholding States can a citizen of a
slave State claim protection for his main property, and the
person of the citizen in numerous cases has been violated, and
in many of these cases the violence has resulted in murder.</p>
        <p>4. The citizens of not less than five non-slaveholding States
have invaded a slaveholding State, and proclaimed the annihilation
of its people by servile insurrection; two of these
States have refused to surrender the felons engaged in this
invasion; and one of these States—that State which claims the
most advanced civilization and refinement, which claims to
represent before the world American sentiment and American
principles—by the most solemn decree, through its highest
constituted authority, has approved of that invasion; and
large bodies of people throughout the whole of the non-slaveholding
States have made votive offerings to the memory
of John Brown and his associates.</p>
        <p>5. The most populous, and by far the most potent, of the
Confederates has proclaimed, for years, through its representatives
in the Federal Senate, that it is a conflict of life and
death between slavery and anti-slavery. This is the solemn
decree, through its constituted forms, of a State containing
near three millions of people, who conduct four-fifths of the
<pb id="prest10" n="10"/>
commerce of the Republic. Additional millions of people,
making majorities in all the States, and many of the States by
legislative action, have declared that the institution of slavery,
as it exists in the Southern States, is an offence to God, and,
therefore, they are bound by the most sacred duty of man to
exterminate that institution. They have declared and acted
upon the declaration, that the existence of slavery in the
Southern States is an offence and a danger to the social institutions
of the Northern States, and, therefore, they are bound
by the instinct of moral right and of self-preservation to exterminate
slavery.</p>
        <p>Finally, impelled by these sacred duties to God and their
consciences, and by the scarcely less binding impulses of self-protection,
after years of earnest labor and devotion to the
purpose, they have succeeded, by large majorities in all
the non-slaveholding States, in placing the entire executive power
of the Federal Government in the hands of those who are
pledged, by their obligations to God, by their obligations to
the social institutions of man, by their obligation of self-preservation,
to place the institution of slavery in a course of
certain and final extinction.</p>
        <p>That is, twenty millions of people, holding one of the
strongest Governments on earth, are impelled, by a perfect
recognition of the most sacred and powerful obligations which
fall upon man, to exterminate the vital interests of eight millions
of people, bound to them by contiguity of territory and
the closest political relations. In other words, the decree inaugurated
on the 6th of November was the annihilation of the
people of the Southern States. Now, gentlemen, the people
of South Carolina, being a portion of those who come within
the ban of this decree, had only to ask themselves: Is existence
worth a struggle? Their answer is given in the Ordinance I
have had the honor to submit to you.</p>
        <p>I see before me wise and learned men, who have observed
and sounded the ways of human life in all its records, and
many who have been chief actors in some of its gravest scenes.
<pb id="prest11" n="11"/>
I ask, then, if in all their lore of human society, they find a
case parallel to this? South Carolina has 300,000 whites and
400,000 slaves; the whites depend on their slaves for their
order of civilization and their existence. Twenty millions of
people, with a powerfully organized Government, and impelled
by the most sacred duties, decree that this slavery must be
exterminated. I ask you, Virginians, is right, is justice, is
existence, worth a struggle?</p>
        <p>I have thus recited, in general terms, the causes which dictated
the action of the people of South Carolina. Were they
given in detail they would embrace half the history of the
Republic for half the period of its existence. From the accession
of the younger Adams to this hour, the main internal
history of the United States has been one untiring, unfaltering
effort on the part of the non-slaveholding States to gain the
control of the Federal Government—first to restrict, then to
subsidize, and now to destroy, the vital interests of the slave
States. Checked or baffled in one course, with the relentless
energy and pertinacity of their nature, they have adopted
another; retarded for a time, by the lingering but sturdy fragments
of a dying patriotism among themselves, or the banded
resistance of their victims, they have still held on with the
fierce grip of avarice, and the mad rage of fanaticism, until
God has cursed them with a triumph which has plunged this
continent into civil war, and destroyed, perhaps forever, the
fairest forms which human philosophy ever grafted upon the
institutions of man.</p>
        <p>Now, gentlemen, for one moment look at the converse of
this picture.</p>
        <p>For over thirty years—by every method of which we could
avail ourselves, by argument, by sovereign protest, by warning,
by prayer, by every energy, and every attribute we could
bring to bear—we have endeavored to avert this catastrophe.
In the Federal Legislature, through this long series of years,
my State has given all her intelligence, all her virtue, and all
her patriotism, to preserve the Constitutional Union; and that
<pb id="prest12" n="12"/>
she had intelligence, that she had patriotism, that she had
virtue, is in proof here by that marble (<hi rend="italics">the bust of Calhoun</hi>)
sitting in the hall where the sovereignty of Virginia is consulting
concerning the honor and the rights of Virginia. In this
struggle Calhoun, McDuffie, Elmore and Butler perished
almost literally in the halls of the Federal Legislature. Failing
in this more than a year ago, seeing the storm impending,
seeing the waves rising, South Carolina sent to this great, this
strong, this wise, this illustrious Republic of Virginia, a grave
commission, the purport of which, with your permission, gentlemen,
I will venture to relate.</p>
        <p>“<hi rend="italics">Whereas</hi>, the State of South Carolina, by her Ordinance of
A. D. 1852, affirmed her right to secede from the Confederacy
whenever the occasion should arise, justifying her, in her own
judgment, in taking that step; and, in the resolution adopted
by her Convention, declared that she forbore the immediate
exercise of that right from considerations of expediency only:</p>
        <p>“<hi rend="italics">And whereas</hi>, more than seven years have elapsed since
that Convention adjourned, and in the intervening time the
assaults upon the institution of slavery, and upon the rights
and equality of the Southern States, have unceasingly continued
with increasing violence, and in new and more alarming
forms; be it therefore,</p>
        <p>“1. <hi rend="italics">Resolved unanimously</hi>, That the State of South Carolina,
still deferring to her Southern sisters, nevertheless respectfully
announces to them, that it is the deliberate judgment
of this General Assembly that the slaveholding States should immediately
meet together to concert measures for united action.</p>
        <p>“2. <hi rend="italics">Resolved unanimously</hi>, That the foregoing preamble
and resolution be communicated by the Governor to all the
slaveholding States, with the earnest request of this State that
they will appoint deputies, and adopt such measures as, in their
judgment, will promote the said meeting.</p>
        <p>“3. <hi rend="italics">Resolved unanimously</hi>, That a special Commissioner be
appointed by his Excellency the Governor to communicate
<pb id="prest13" n="13"/>
the foregoing preamble and resolutions to the State of Virginia,
and to express to the authorities of that State the cordial
sympathy of the people of South Carolina with the people of
Virginia, and their earnest desire to unite with them in measures
of common defence.”</p>
        <p>Unsuccessful in that effort, the people of South Carolina, for
the first time in over twenty years, joined with the party
organizations of the day, and honestly, earnestly, and with
anxious solicitude, gave her unanimous vote to that party, the
success of which they believed would prolong the Union.
Defeated in this last hope—having exhausted argument,
protest, prayer, counsel, hope itself—the people of South Carolina
calmly, unostentatiously, without clamor, but with a
determination as fixed as destiny, ordained this Act, in these
few simple words, which I will read to the Convention:</p>
        <q direct="unspecified">
          <hi rend="italics">“We, the people of the State of South Carolina, in Convention
assembled, do declare and ordain, and it is hereby declared
and ordained,</hi>
        </q>
        <p>That the Ordinance adopted by us, in Convention, on the
twenty-third day of May, in the year of our Lord one thousand
seven hundred and eighty-eight, whereby the Constitution
of the United States of America was ratified, and, also, all
Acts and parts of Acts of the General Assembly of this State,
ratifying amendments of the said Constitution, are hereby
repealed; and that the union now subsisting between South
Carolina and other States, under the name of ‘The United
States of America,’ is hereby dissolved.”</p>
        <p>Even after this the people of South Carolina are not satisfied.
They still seek counsel; they still seek sympathy; they still
seek aid, in the protection of their rights and their honor; and
for this I am here to-day.</p>
        <p>Now, gentlemen, notwithstanding these facts I have endeavored
to group before you—notwithstanding this labor, this
<pb id="prest14" n="14"/>
long-suffering, this patience I have endeavored to show you she
has practiced—throughout this whole land, over all Christendom,
my State has been accused of “rash precipitancy.” Is it
rash precipitancy to step out of the pathway when you hear
the thunder-crash of the falling avalanche? Is it rash precipitancy
to seek for shelter when you hear the hissing of the
coming tempest, and see the storm-cloud close down upon you?
Is it rash precipitancy to raise your hands to protect your heart?</p>
        <p>I venture to assert, that never, since liberty came into the
institutions of man, have a people borne with more patience,
or forborne with more fortitude, than have the people of these
Southern States in their relations with their confederates. As
long as it was merely silly fanaticism or prurient philanthropy
which proposed our destruction, we did nothing—scarcely
complained. Even when partial and most oppressive taxation,
continued for years, ground us into the dust of poverty, save
for a moment of convulsive struggle, we bore it patiently;
even when many of our confederates, by State and municipal
regulations, violated provisions of our compact vital to us, and
hordes of their people, under the sanction of these regulations,
robbed our property and murdered our citizens; even when,
under the same sanction, bands of wild fanatics invaded slave
States, and proclaimed the destruction of slavery by the annihilation
of the slaveholder, and States and cities erected shrines to
the memory of the felons; when one confederate demanded
that we must be driven from the civilization of the age in
which we live, and another sent its chief representative to
defame us before the civilized world; beneath all these enormities,
we continued to give our blood, our gold and our sweat
to build up the grandeur and maintain the power of that
Republic. And when there was added to this all that baffled
avarice, malignant fanaticism and moral turpitude could devise
to vilify, wrong and irritate us, we still gave our blood and
treasure, and offered our hands, and called them brethren. I
draw no fancy picture, I use no declamatory assertions.</p>
        <p>There is not a man in this Convention who may not cite
<pb id="prest15" n="15"/>
twenty cases to meet every item of this catalogue. But when,
at last, this fanaticism and eager haste for rapine, mingling
their foul purposes, engendered those fermenting millions who
have seized the Constitution and distorted its most sacred form
into an instrument of our ruin, why then longer submission
seemed to us not only base cowardice, but absolute fatuity.
In South Carolina we felt that, to remain one hour under such
a domination, we would merit the destruction earned by our
own folly and baseness. We felt that if there was one son of
a Carolina sire who would counsel such submission, there was
not a hill-side or a plain, from Eutaw to the Cowpens, from
which the spirit of his offended sire would not start forth to
shame him from the land he desecrated. We did not find air
enough in that little State to give breath to such counsel;
there was not firm earth enough there for one such counsellor
to stand upon.</p>
        <p>I pray you, gentlemen of Virginia, to pardon me for referring
with some particularity to the position of my State in
connection with these matters, because she has been much
spoken of, and not much praised. I am here as the Commissioner
of these people, certainly not their eulogist. I am sent
here, as I thought, mainly because among them I have always,
with some pride, proclaimed that I sprang from this soil, and
because they believe that I would tell an honest, earnest story
of their wrongs and trials; and if you will permit me, I will
still further allude to it. Never, gentlemen, since liberty
begun her struggles in the world, has a mighty drama, to
be enacted on the trembling stage of man's affairs, been opened
with a spectacle of purer moral sublimity than that which has
been manifested in this revolution in which we are now engaged.
Scarcely had this decree of our subjection been borne
to our ears on the Northern breeze, than, as if from the very
caverns of the earth, there rose up one voice, one voice only,
from the people of South Carolina, who shouted back, resistance
to the death. Their Legislature, then in session, caught that
spirit, and with one voice, one voice only, proclaimed, resistance
<pb id="prest16" n="16"/>
to the death. The people of the State, again in their
sovereign capacity, as you are here, with one voice, one voice
only, ordained, resistance to the death. And now, there is not,
in the borders of that little State, one man, from sixteen to
sixty, who can walk or stand, who is not armed, standing ready
to resist to the death. [Applause.] We are very small—very
weak—but if that fire-storm with which we are threatened
should fall upon us and consume us, hereafter the pilgrim of
liberty, perhaps from this State, who may be searching beneath
the ruins of Charleston, will find the skeleton of our sentinel
standing at our sea-gate.</p>
        <p>Believe it not, sir, that in taking this position we have been
forgetful of the past, or reckless of the future. No, sir! it is
the great past, and our sacred obligations to the future, which
have nerved us to the act. It was the splendor of the past
which dazzled our eyes, until the substance of liberty had
almost slipped from our grasp. For years and years we paused,
as we held up the curtain and gazed back on the unforgotten
glories of the hallowed past, as we beheld that fairest temple
in which liberty had ever found a shrine; that which Washington
and Jefferson, Adams and Franklin, Henry and Madison,
the Lees, Masons, Rutledges and Pinckneys—a conclave
of demi-gods—had builded up as a tabernacle for us to dwell
in forever, and consecrated it with the blood of our own
fathers; that citadel of liberty; that palladium of human
right; that precious muniment of human hope; that refuge of
hope all over the earth; that world, won from the wilderness
to God and liberty. Sir, with pious reverence we looked upon
all this; and yet, with these hands, we tore it down; with
these feet, we trampled it out of life; with this breath, we
scattered the fragments on the winds; and, yet, we do not
tremble; we are not appalled; our hands are unstained, pure,
clear, unterrified, as we raise them in confident appeal to the
God of Truth, Justice and Right. Armed in this panoply, we
drop the curtain, and are ready to move onward through the
coming scenes of this solemn drama.</p>
        <pb id="prest17" n="17"/>
        <p>Gentlemen of Virginia, the people of these Southern States
are no noisy faction, clamoring for place and power; no
hungry rabble, answering in blood to every appeal to brutal
passion; no shouting mob, ready to take for their Government
a glittering epigram, or a fustian theory. They are not canting
fanatics, festering in the licentiousness of abolition and amalgamation.
Their liberty is not a painted strumpet, straggling
through the streets. Nor does their truth need to baptise
itself in pools of blood. They are a grave, calm, prosperous,
religious people; the holders of the most majestic civilization;
the inheritors, by right, of the fairest estate of liberty; fighting
for that liberty; fighting for their fathers' graves; standing
athwart their hearth-stones, and before their chamber doors.
In this fight, for a time, my little State stood alone; that little
State, around whose outermost borders the guns fired at the
Capital might almost be heard; whose scope of sky is scarce
large enough for one star to glitter in; so small, so weak, so
few, we began this fight alone against millions; and had millions
been piled on millions, under God, in such a fight, we would
have triumphed. But, sir, that God cares for Liberty, Truth
and Right among His people—and we are no longer alone. 
Our own children from Florida and Alabama answered to the
maternal call; and our great sister Georgia marshalled forth
her giant progeny; the voice of Quitman came up out of his
grave on the Mississippi; and Louisiana proved herself the offspring
of the “Apostle of Liberty;” and, now, young Texas
raises her giant form, and takes her place at the head of this
majestic column of Confederated Sovereignties. And, sir,
wherever Virginia has a son beyond her borders, his voice is
known, because he speaks in the ancient tongue of his mother.
Mr. President, I, one of the humblest of these sons, have told
my adopted brethren—I have promised them—that before the
spring grass grows long enough to weave a chaplet of triumph,
they will hear the stately tramp as of a mighty host of men—sound as if the armies of Destiny were afoot; and they will
see floating above that host a banner, whose whole history is
<pb id="prest18" n="18"/>
one blaze of glory, and not one blot of shame; and coming up
from that host, they will hear one voice, aye, like their own,
one voice only; the resounding echo of that voice which first
thundered into the hearts of your god-like sires, “Give me
liberty, or give me death!” and on that banner will be written
the unsullied name of Virginia. The world knows her history,
and knows no history above it in the niche of fame—and
knowing it, none dare doubt where Virginia will be found
when her own offspring, divine liberty and justice, call her to
the fight. Have I promised too much in the name of our
mother? In us, the doubt would be worse than blasphemy.
She will take her place in the front ranks. She will be, as she
has been for one hundred years, the foremost of the world in
the cause of liberty. She will stand here with her uplifted
arm, not only as a barrier, but the guiding-star to an Empire,
stretching from her feet to the tropics, from the Atlantic to the
Pacific; grander in proportions, stronger in power, freer in
right, than any which has preceded it; which will divide the
rule of the Atlantic, be felt in the far-heaving waves of the
Pacific, and will own the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean
Sea.</p>
        <p>Mr. President, I appear before you in behalf of a portion of
those who believe in this coming greatness, and who have by
cruel wrong and injustice been driven from their inheritance
in the mighty past; and I ask Virginia to come in the majesty
of her august history, and the power of her courage and
strength, and command this transcendent future.</p>
        <p>Mr. President, I have endeavored to confine my words specifically
to the matter of my own mission here. I fear, sir,
that the scene and the place have deluded me to go, somewhat
erratically, beyond my intention; but I have not ventured to
discuss, before this Convention, those essential principles on
which our order of liberty was <sic corr="institutionalized">institutionized</sic> in America,
after centuries of struggle, from Runymede to Yorktown, nor
their destructive violation, involved in the daring aggressions
upon the confederate and absolute rights of the Southern
<pb id="prest19" n="19"/>
people, by the people and States of the North. I cannot teach
this Convention. There are many men here who may truly
use the words of the Greeks, “We thank God we are as wise
and virtuous as our fathers.” Such men cannot be taught,
either the principles or the duties of liberty and truth. That
knowledge, gentlemen of Virginia, is your birth-right.</p>
        <p>I will, however, ask a few minutes more of your time, while
I attempt, very rapidly, and in the most general terms, to
exhibit some of the fundamental causes which the people of
the South regard as justifying their belief that there never
ought to be, and that there never can be, a reconstruction of
the late Federal Union. Leaving out of consideration the
fact, that the acquiescence, which originally founded the
Union, was enforced by necessity rather than free consent, the
truth seems evident, to every mind which dares to speculate
advisedly on the manifest principles of that revolution we are
now enacting, that they do involve fundamental and irreconcilable
diversities, between the systems on which slaveholding
and non-slaveholding communities may endure. We believe
that these repellent diversities pertain to every attribute which
belongs to the two systems, and, consequently, that this revolution—this separation—this disintegration—is no accident;
that it is no merely casual result of a temporary cause; that it
is no evanescent bubble of popular error or irritation; that it
is no dream of philosophy; nor is it the achievement of individual
ambition. It has a cause more profound and pervading
than all these. It is not only a revolution of actual material
necessity, but it is a revolution resulting from the deepest convictions,
the ideas, the sentiments, the moral and intellectual
necessities, of earnest and intelligent men. It is not only the
primeval and never-dying struggle of the liberty of labor
against the despotism of power; but it is that still sterner conflict
which shivered Greece and disintegrated the huge and
solid mass of Rome; which gathers into its contending armies
all the necessities, the customs, the laws, the religions, the sentiments,
and the passions, which constitute the civilization of
<pb id="prest20" n="20"/>
man. You may, as you are at this moment doing, centralize a
coercive power at Washington, stronger than the Prætorian
bands, when the Roman eagles shadowed the earth “from
Lusitania to the Caucasus;” but you cannot come nearer
coalescing the people of Virginia and the people of Vermont,
the people of the St. Lawrence and the people of the Gulf,
than did Rome to make one of the Gaul and the Dacian, the
Briton and the Ionian. No community of origin—no community
of language, law or religion, can amalgamate a people
whose severance is proclaimed by the rigid requisitions of material
necessity. Nature forbids African slavery at the North.
Southern civilization cannot exist without African slavery.
None but an equal race can labor at the North. None but a
subject race will labor at the South. Destroy involuntary
labor, and Anglo-Saxon civilization must be remitted to the
latitudes whence it sprung.</p>
        <p>Now, for these and other reasons, we believe the political
and social organisms have assumed forms so distinct and antagonistic,
that a reconcilement of them is simply an impossibility.
To cite one or two instances—for I am only making
suggestions for your consideration in connection with the
matter in hand: In the free States, the simple, isolated, exclusive,
sole political principle is a <hi rend="italics">pure democracy</hi> of mere
numbers, save a scarcely discernible modification, by a vague
and undefined form of representation. In these States there
can be no departure from this principle in its extremest intensity.
The admission of the slightest adverse element is
forbidden by the whole genius of the people and their institutions.
It is as delicate in its sensitiveness as personal right
in England, or slavery in Carolina. It is the vitalizing principle,
the breath of the life of Northern socialism. The almighty
power of numbers is the basis of all social agreement
in the Northern States. A fearful illustration of this is at this
moment exhibiting its results in the Government under which
you are consenting to live. That Government was “instituted
and appointed” to protect and secure equally the interest of
<pb id="prest21" n="21"/>
the parts. By the agency of mere numbers, one section has
been restricted and another expanded in territory; one section
has been unduly and oppressively taxed, and one section has
been brought to imminent peril; and in this hour the people
of the North are consulting whether they can subjugate the
people of the South by the <hi rend="italics">right of number</hi>.</p>
        <p>The “government by the people” is equally the rule of the
South, but the modification of the “rule of numbers” is so
essential in the slave States, that it cannot co-exist with the
same principle in its unrestricted form. In the South, it is
controlled, perhaps made absolutely subject, by the fact that
the recognition of a specific property is essential to the vitalization
of the social and political organisms. If, then, you attempt
to institute the rule of either form into the organism of
the other, you instantly destroy the section you invade. To
proclaim to the North that <hi rend="italics">numbers</hi> shall not be absolute,
would be as offensive as to proclaim the extinction of Slavery
in the South. The element of property would neutralize the
entire political system at the North; its exclusion would subvert
the whole organism of the South.</p>
        <p>But there is another element of disintegration and repulsion,
still more potent than the geographical or the political severance.
It comes of the deep-seated, but active, religious sentiment,
which belongs to both people, having arrayed itself on
the sides of the sections. This diversity, at this moment, is
appearing, not in forms of denominational polemics, but in
shapes as bloody and terrible as Religion has ever assumed
since Christ came to the earth. Its representative, the Church,
has bared her arm for the conflict—her sword is already flashing
in the glare of the torch of fanaticism—and the history of
the world tells us that when that sword cleaves asunder, no
human surgery can heal the wound. There is not one Christian
slaveholder here, no matter how near he may be to his
meek and lowly Master, who does not feel in his heart, that
from the point of that sword is now dripping the last drop of
<pb id="prest22" n="22"/>
sympathy which bound him to his brethren of the North.
With demoniac rage, they have set the Lamb of God between
their seed and our seed.</p>
        <p>I have run rapidly over these diversities to show that they
pervade the entire composition of the social systems of the
two sections, and that, therefore, we believe the political union
unnatural and monstrous; and its offspring must be abortive
and fruitless, save of that fearful brood of woes which must
always come from such conjunctions.</p>
        <p>We believe, as a completely logical and reasonable deduction
from these repellent attributes of the Northern and Southern
sections of the late Confederacy, there have arisen those
constructions of the terms of confederation, which have converted
a Government of consent into a Government of force;
which have driven seven States to abandon that Government;
which have, for sixty days, kept loaded bomb-shells bearing
on the women and children of Charleston; which have turned
the Federal guns on the Capitol of Virginia; and which, if
Virginia murmurs against these guns being so turned, threatens
to send the ruffians of Boston and New York to re-enact
the scenes of 1813 at Portsmouth and Hampton.</p>
        <p>Where these natural and conventional repulsions exist, the
conflict is for life and death. And that conflict is now upon
you. Gentlemen of Virginia, you own an empire. You are
very strong. You have advanced in all the arts of life, and
are very wise and very skillful. You have achieved much
glory, and have great virtue. You may thus drag down your
mountain tops and fill up your valleys. You may unite the
waters of remote oceans. You may again pull down civil dynasties
and religions, and on their ruins rebuild the forms of
liberty and faith. But I tell you, there is no force of human
power—there is no assay of human art—there is no sanctity of
human touch—which can reunite the people of the North and
the people of the South as political and social equals. No,
gentlemen, never; never, until by your power, your art, and
<pb id="prest23" n="23"/>
your virtue, you can unfix the unchangeable economy of the
Eternal God, can you make of the people of the North and
the people of the South one people.</p>
        <p>An irresistible instinct of self-preservation has forced the
cotton States to recognize this absolute and imperative diversity,
and they are now proceeding to erect their institutions
on its present necessity. The Northern States are also manifesting
their recognition of the same diversity, by preparing,
with the aid of the agents of non-slavery, known as the army
and navy of the United States, to attempt the subjugation of
the Southern States.</p>
        <p>I believe the question to be decided by you, gentlemen, is,
whether Virginia, like the trembling Egyptian, will skulk for
shelter beneath the crumbling fragments of a past greatness,
to dwell under the scourge of a haughty, but mean taskmaster;
or whether she will step forth, and, with one voice,
hush the storm of war, and keep the ancient glory of her
name. The times must be far more distempered than now—indeed, prophecy dare not seek, for it can never reach that
future—when Virginians will hesitate to decide this question.</p>
        <p>Mr. President, the people of South Carolina have declared,
in the language of the various compacts between them and
their confederates, that they have always retained their sovereignty
and independence; that they, with their confederates,
did delegate certain powers to a common agent; that, by their
confederates, this compact has been violated, and the Government
established under it has become destructive of the purposes
for which it was established; and it is, therefore, their
right to abolish that Government, so far as it concerns them,
and institute another. They have solemnly ordained, and are
now, and have, for sixty days, been maintaining that Ordinance
by arms, that all political connection with the Government of
the United States is dissolved.</p>
        <p>The admitted rule on which they have resorted to arms is,
“That a violation of a perfect right, either committed or committing
or with which a people is threatened in the future,
<pb id="prest24" n="24"/>
justifies the undertaking of war—amicable means having been
tried in vain. When it is evident that it would be useless to
try such means, justice requires a resort to arms.”</p>
        <p>On this rule, the people of South Carolina have resorted to
arms in defence of a “perfect right.”</p>
        <p>As I have stated, they have maintained this position for a
reasonable time, notwithstanding their chief harbor has been
blockaded and their territory invaded; they have maintained
it in honor against falsehood and treachery; they have maintained
it until five millions of people and six sovereign States
have joined with them to form a Government, in which, in the
language of the eminent citizen who has been placed in charge
of the Executive Department of that Government, there can
be no cause for doubt that “the courage and patriotism of the
people of the Confederate States will be found equal to any
measures of defence which our honor and security may require.
Further obstacles may retard the progress of that Government,
but they cannot long prevent the progress of a movement
sanctified by its justice, and sustained by a virtuous people.
Reverently let us invoke the God of our fathers, to guide and
protect us in our efforts to perpetuate the principles which, by
His blessing, they were able to vindicate, establish and transmit
to posterity; and with that continuance of His favor ever
gratefully acknowledged, we will hopefully look forward to
success, peace and prosperity.”</p>
        <p>Believing the rights violated and the interests involved are
identical with the rights and interests of the people of Virginia,
and remembering their ancient amity and their common glory,
the people of South Carolina have instructed me to ask, earnestly
and respectfully, that the people of Virginia will join
them in the protection of their rights and interests.</p>
        <p>Mr. President, I have performed my missions, and do now, in
the name of my Government, tender to this Convention the
most cordial thanks for their honorable consideration of that
mission; and, in my own behalf, I offer to the Convention and
the citizens of Virginia, my heartfelt gratitude for their noble
courtesy and most generous kindness to myself personally.</p>
      </div1>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI.2>