<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite.dtd" [
<!ENTITY % external-entities SYSTEM "./extEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY % internal-entities SYSTEM "./intEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY mitchcv SYSTEM "mitchcv.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
]>
<TEI.2>
  <teiHeader type="" status="new">
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title><emph>Letter to Hon. Chas. B. Mitchell, in Relation to the Iron Business of Alabama.:</emph>
Electronic Edition.</title>
        <author>Shelby Iron Company. </author>
        <funder>Funding from the Institute of Museum and Library
 Services supported the electronic publication of this title.</funder>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text scanned (OCR) by</resp>
          <name>Gina Cash</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Images scanned by</resp>
          <name>Elizabeth S. Wright</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
          <name>Elizabeth S. Wright and Jill Kuhn</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <editionStmt>
        <edition>First edition, <date>2000</date></edition>
      </editionStmt>
      <extent>ca. 30K</extent>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>Academic Affairs Library, UNC-CH</publisher>
        <pubPlace>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, </pubPlace>
        <date>2000.</date>
        <availability status="unknown">
          <p>© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina 
at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching and personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the text.</p>
        </availability>
      </publicationStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <biblFull>
          <titleStmt>
            <title type="title page">Letter to Hon. Chas. B. Mitchell, in Relation To the Iron Business of Alabama.</title>
          </titleStmt>
          <extent>11 p.</extent>
          <publicationStmt>
            <pubPlace>Selma, Ala.</pubPlace>
            <publisher>Mississippian Steam Book and Job Office</publisher>
            <date>1864</date>
            <authority/>
          </publicationStmt>
          <notesStmt>
            <note anchored="yes">Call number  2939 Conf.  (Rare Book Collection, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)</note>
          </notesStmt>
        </biblFull>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <projectDesc>
        <p>The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-CH
digitization project, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South.</hi></p>
      </projectDesc>
      <editorialDecl>
        <p>This electronic edition has been created by Optical
Character Recognition (OCR). OCR-ed text has been compared against the
original document and corrected.  The text has been encoded using the
recommendations for Level 4 of the TEI in Libraries Guidelines.</p>
        <p>Original grammar, punctuation, and spelling have been preserved.  Encountered
typographical errors have been preserved, and appear in red type.</p>
        <p>Any hyphens occurring in line breaks have been 
removed, and the trailing part of a word has been joined to 
the preceding line.</p>
        <p>All quotation marks, em dashes  and ampersand have been transcribed as
entity references.</p>
        <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as ” and “
respectively.</p>
        <p>All em dashes are encoded as —</p>
        <p>Indentation in lines has not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Running titles have not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Spell-check and verification made against printed text using Author/Editor (SoftQuad) and Microsoft Word spell check programs.</p>
      </editorialDecl>
      <classDecl>
        <taxonomy id="lcsh">
          <bibl>
            <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings, </title>
            <edition>21st edition, 1998</edition>
          </bibl>
        </taxonomy>
      </classDecl>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <langUsage>
        <language id="eng">English</language>
      </langUsage>
      <textClass>
        <keywords scheme="lcsh">
          <list type="simple">
            <item>Iron.</item>
            <item>Iron industry and trade -- Alabama -- History.</item>
            <item>Iron industry and trade -- Confederate States of America --
History.</item>
            <item>Iron industry and trade -- Confederate States of America --
Employees.</item>
            <item>Rolling-mills -- Confederate States of America --
Employees.</item>
            <item>Alabama -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865.</item>
            <item>United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Equipment 
and
supplies.</item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change>
        <date>2000-10-12, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Celine Noel and Wanda Gunther </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> revised TEIHeader and created catalog 
record for the electronic edition.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>2000-07-26, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Jill Kuhn </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished TEI-conformant encoding and final proofing.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>2000-07-24, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Elizabeth S. Wright</name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> finished TEI/SGML encoding</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>2000-07-21, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Gina Cash</name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> finished scanning (OCR) and proofing.</item>
      </change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <front>
      <div1 type="cover image">
        <p>
          <figure id="cover" entity="mitchcv">
            <p>[Cover Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <titlePage>
        <titlePart type="main">LETTER
<lb/>TO<lb/>
HON. CHAS. B. MITCHELL,
<lb/>
IN RELATION TO
<lb/>
THE IRON BUSINESS
<lb/>
OF
<lb/>
ALABAMA.</titlePart>
        <docImprint><pubPlace>Selma, ALA.:</pubPlace>
<publisher>MISSISSIPPIAN STEAM BOOK AND JOB OFFICE.</publisher>
<docDate>1864.</docDate></docImprint>
      </titlePage>
    </front>
    <body>
      <div1 type="text">
        <head>LETTER.</head>
        <opener><date>SHELBY COUNTY, ALA., <date>April 26th, 1864.</date></date>
<salute><name>Hon. CHARLES B. MITCHELL,</name>
<lb/>
<hi rend="italics">of the Confederate States Senate:</hi></salute></opener>
        <p>Being informed by a member of the Shelby Iron Company
that you solicit information in regard to the iron business
of this region, with a view to important measures contemplated,
having reference to the military service; and having
a similar solicitation from another source, also entitled to
consideration and respect, the undersigned, constituting the
Board of Directors of the above-named Company, while
responding, as they do with pleasure, to your solicitation,
will embrace this opportunity to set forth as succinctly as
practicable the information they possess and the knowledge
they have acquired by attention to the subject during the
two last years. They do this the more readily from the
conviction that the subject is not so fully and generally
understood, and appreciated, as its great and vital importance
requires.</p>
        <p>The present supply of iron is inadequate for the public
service, while the people are generally cut off from all
sources of supply. The agriculturalists are generally without
iron to repair their old and worn-out implements, new
ones being out of the question, while there is danger that
railroads, on which such vital interests depend, will lose
much of their already impaired efficiency, for want of iron
to keep their machinery in repair, and for the construction
of the additional machinery greatly needed. A large and
early increase in the production of iron must therefore be
regarded as a matter of the highest necessity; and this
region probably must be mainly relied on for this increase.</p>
        <p>Before undertaking to show, as we propose to do, how this
increase may be brought about, it will be proper to take a
brief survey of the past, in connection with the natural
resources of this region in the materials for the production
<pb id="mitch4" n="4"/>
of iron. Probably no country on the globe possesses superior,
if equal, natural advantages for the production of iron
of superior quality on an extensive scale. In a wide extent
of country, intersected by the Alabama and Tennessee
River Railroad, commencing at the city of Selma, on the
Alabama river, and completed 135 miles in the direction of
Rome, in Georgia, iron ores and mineral coal, both of superior
quality and conveniently accessible, exist in inexhaustible
abundance. These minerals, if not in juxtaposition,
are yet in such proximity that they may be regarded as
practically lying side by side. With these unsurpassed advantages,
how is the comparative smallness of the production
of iron to be accounted for?</p>
        <p>At the commencement of the war, very little had been
done to develope the mineral resources of this section or
State. There was but one small blast furnace and a small
and inferior rolling-mill in operation in this section, and
none elsewhere, that we know of, in this State. Our people
were content to draw their supplies of iron from England
and the North, while overlooking, or perhaps ignorant of,
the greatly superior natural advantages existing in their
midst, for the production of iron of far better quality than
most of that derived from abroad. Hence, the country was
without the knowledge and skill, derived alone from experience,
in the business of manufacturing iron, as those seem
to have been to whom was committed the important duty
of calling forth and directing the capital and energies to be
embarked in the business. The mode of making iron, condemned
and abandoned by England and other countries
more than a century ago, was taken up and exclusively pursued;
that is, the use of charcoal, instead of mineral coal,
as fuel in the production of pig iron. All the contracts of
which we have any knowledge, made with the Government
for pig iron, call for charcoal pig alone, giving a decided
preference in prices to that which is made by the slowest
and most difficult process: that is, the cold blast charcoal
pig. And here a brief reference may be allowed to the history
of the manufacture of iron in England, whose mighty
power and prosperity had their rise in, and are mainly sustained
by, the two minerals heretofore so neglected, not to
say despised, in the South—coal and iron.</p>
        <p>A well-informed and intelligent writer, whose production
shows that he had given very close attention to the subject,
in enumerating the essentials for the successful prosecution
of the business of making iron, states, as the first and most
important: “An adequate supply of the requisite raw materials
<pb id="mitch5" n="5"/>
—ore, limestone and mineral coal—for charcoal, can
only be used to an insignificant extent.” In illustration of
this, the same writer states: “It surprises the inquirer, to
find that in the year 1740, the total production of iron in
England amounted to not more than 17,350 tons. The 
destruction of wood caused by this insignificant product
was so rapid, that the business of making iron was likely to
be extinguished, when the evil which was dreaded gave
birth to a remedy which imparted new life to the production,
and has enabled it to reach its present gigantic proportions”
—then (1855) estimated, or rather stated to be
3,585,906 tons. “This remedy was the substitution of pit
or mineral coal for charcoal.” This stupendous result was
attained in England with ores much more difficult to be
mined, and known to be greatly inferior in richness and
other qualities to the ores which abound in this region.
The ores of England and Wales, it is stated on good authority,
yield only about 30 per cent of iron while the ores
of this region, with which we are most familiar, yield from
50 to 60 per cent., and iron very greatly superior to the
generality of that produced in England or Wales.</p>
        <p>These facts and others similar, which could be adduced,
show clearly, we think, that we have set out upon and are
pursuing a wrong policy. Even if the iron produced by
mineral coal were not so good as that produced by charcoal,
still it would be better to have iron not quite so good, than
not to have it at all. But it has been recently proved, by
experiment made by this Company, that iron of superior
quality can be made from our ores, by the use of the mineral
coal of this region exclusively as fuel, in the whole process
from the ore to bar iron. The result of this experiment
was every way satisfactory. The iron was subjected
to severe tests, and exhibited remarkable strength and
toughness.</p>
        <p>As a further and practical illustration of this subject, we
will state something of the operations and experience of
this Company. Unacquainted with the business as they
were, they commenced, some two years ago, with the idea
of constructing three, four or five blast furnaces, expecting
to make some ten thousand tons or more of iron per year,
after completing their arrangements. But the first furnace 
built by them had not been long in operation, before they
discovered that it would be a hard task to keep that single
furnace in full and constant operation with charcoal, even
while the wood from which the coal was obtained stood
within convenient proximity to the furnace. The forests
<pb id="mitch6" n="6"/>
which stood near have, in a great measure, disappeared,
materially increasing the difficulty of procuring fuel. From
this and other causes growing out of the condition of the
country, such as want of laborers, the scarcity and dearness
of provisions and all other necessaries, the impracticability
of obtaining teams to put  in the places of those worn out
by hard and constant service, the business is attended with
many more difficulties now than in the early part of last
year. With great exertion, the Company were able to
make and deliver to the Government last year, counting
from March to March, only about 3,500 tons, including what
they used in improvements and repairs. Small as this
quantity may appear, it exceeds what any other Company
in this State made within the same period. The difficulties
attending the business now, being considerably greater than
heretofore, this quantity is not likely to be increased, but
rather diminished, in the future, under the present system.
Bur we presume this system will not be adhered to. We
are about making propositions to the Nitre and Mining
Bureau at Richmond, looking to changes which, as they involve
no loss or expense or inconvenience to the Government,
while promising a large increase in the production of
iron, we can hardly doubt will receive the proper sanction.
If this is done, we propose to complete a new furnace, commenced
last year, construct a railroad from our works to the
Alabama and Tennessee River road, about six miles, on
which the work is far advanced and in progress, and make
other necessary arrangements for obtaining a full and regular
supply of mineral coal. This being done, and substituting
mineral for charcoal, we have great confidence in the
ability of the Company to increase the manufacture of iron
more than a hundred per cent., without increasing the number
of laborers required in their present business, and with
one-fourth the number of wagons and teams now employed.
It is deemed unnecessary to go into a statement of particulars
to show how this result can be brought about. The
great advantage consists in dispensing with a large number
of hands and teams required in the production and hauling
of charcoal, and in the increased amount of iron which an
equal quantity of mineral coal will produce. It is estimated
that the hands required in the production and delivery of
charcoal for one furnace, are sufficient to mine coal enough
for two furnaces. This Company propose to mine their own
coal, having one mine opened and being engaged in opening
another. What is practicable for this Company, may be
<pb id="mitch7" n="7"/>
fairly presumed to be so for a portion at least of the other
Companies of this region.</p>
        <p>The business of mining coal is being largely extended,
and under the arrangement completed and in progress, the
prospects are that the supply or coal will, ere very long, be
ample. The principal difficulty to be apprehended in the
successful prosecution of the plan of substituting mineral
coal for charcoal, in a large degree, is the want of railroad
machinery for transporting the coal. The present machinery
is insufficient, but we understand that arrangements
have been made to bring upon the road considerable additional
machinery.</p>
        <p>We will now proceed to give you, as nearly as we can,
the special information you desired.</p>
        <p>We have no sufficient data on which to state the quantity
of iron produced in this State during the last twelve months,
say from first of March, 1863, to March, 1864; but probably
it was considerably less than 10,000 tons. There were in
this region but three blast furnaces in operation during the
first half of last year, and one on the Coosa river, the iron
from which goes to Rome, Ga. Three other furnaces were
started, one in June or July, and two others subsequently.
If these seven furnaces shall be kept in regular operation,
adhering to the use of charcoal, it may be reasonably calculated
that they will together produce from 300 to 320 tons
per week, or from 13,000 to 14,000 tons per year, presuming
they will run forty-four weeks in a year.</p>
        <p>Four or five additional furnaces are expected to be in
operation in the course of three or four months, and one of
them may already be in operation. These furnaces will be
of greater capacity than the average of those heretofore in
operation. Should they commence operations, say four of
them, by the first of July or August, and run eight or nine
months up to the first of March, the average product of the
four may be reasonably estimated at from 210 to 220 tons
per week, or from 6,500 to 7,500 tons for the eight or nine
months. This, added to the estimates given above for the
other furnaces, would give about 20,000 tons from March,
1864, to March, 1865. These estimates are deemed reasonable,
under the supposition that the furnaces referred to be
kept in regular operation with charcoal for the periods
mentioned. It would not, however, be safe to rely with full
confidence on this result under existing circumstances, if the
exclusive use of charcoal be adhered to in the production of
pig iron.</p>
        <p>But presuming that two or three of the present furnaces,
and two of those to be completed, embracing the largest of
<pb id="mitch8" n="8"/>
the furnaces, shall be operated with mineral coal for seven
or eight months prior to the first of March next, say for
thirty weeks, the increased production from them might be
reasonably put at from 280 to 300 tons per week, or from
8,000 to 9,000 tons per thirty weeks, which is probably more
iron than was made by all the furnaces of this region for
the year ending the first of March last.</p>
        <p>We come now to speak of the rolling-mills of this State.</p>
        <p>This Company have one, the capacity of which, with the
addition of two or three more puddling furnaces, which
could soon be constructed, may be estimated at 30 tons per
day of gunboat plate, and proportionably of smaller sizes,
making an average of about twenty tons per day of various
sizes.</p>
        <p>There is a large rolling-mill at Selma nearly completed,
and expected to go into operation in May next. The capacity
of this mill is estimated at thirty tons per day of
gunboat plate and other large sizes, being constructed with
the view of making gunboat plates, boiler plates, etc. The
same Company, we understand, are making preparations for
the construction of a mill for making small and ordinary
sizes of iron.</p>
        <p>There is a small rolling-mill at Montgomery, but we are
not informed of its capacity; but it is probably from three
to five tons per day.</p>
        <p>The Government own a rolling-mill on the Alabama and
Tennessee River Railroad. It is new and represented to be
a very good mill. It is adapted, we believe, for the manufacture
of small and ordinary sizes only. We are not informed
of its capacity.</p>
        <p>Arrangements are in progress for the erection of two
rolling-mills on the Central Railroad, which connects with
the Alabama and Tennessee River road. It is understood
that one, if not both, of these mills will be of large capacity,
belonging to a large and strong Company.</p>
        <p>It is doubtless a reasonable estimate, that the mills now in
operation, and the one in Selma soon to be completed, can,
if supplied with the requisite number of proper workmen
and the necessary materials, make from fifty to sixty tons of
iron per day, including from thirty to forty tons of gunboat
plates and other large sizes. The other mills referred to,
when completed and in operation, would probably increase
the quantity from thirty-five to forty-five tons per day.
These estimates are based upon the presumption that the
mills would have a full quota of competent workmen and an
ample supply of the necessary materials. To the extent
<pb id="mitch9" n="9"/>
that these may be lacking, the product of course would be
diminished.</p>
        <p>There being yet wide, unoccupied fields, other establishments
may, and doubtless under proper encouragement
will, spring up for the manufacture of both pig and bar iron.</p>
        <p>A branch railroad is being constructed from the Alabama
and Tennessee River road into a portion of what is considered
one of the most valuable coal fields in this State, where
the coal seams are said to range from three and a half to
six feet and upwards in thickness, and well situated, many
of them for cheap and convenient mining. One vein, said
to measure twelve feet in thickness, has been discovered:
It is estimated that the region to be penetrated and developed
by this branch road, which it is intended to complete
at the earliest day practicable to an extent sufficient to devolope
a large portion of the coal, will afford many millions
of tons. A good many hands are now at work there, opening
mines or getting out coal, which is done entirely, or
nearly so, with negro labor. A comparatively small number
of experienced and skilled miners, to lead in and direct the
work, would greatly improve and facilitate the operations.</p>
        <p>If we have transcended what was expected, and gone
more at large into the subject of your inquiry than was anticipated,
let it be attributed to our deep impression of the
importance of the matters referred to. And as we have
studiously endeavored to confine our observations strictly
within the limits of practical truths bearing directly on the
subject, and to avoid the presentation of all impertinent
facts and considerations, we cannot doubt that our response
in the unexpected shape presented will be acceptable.</p>
        <p>The facts herein brought to view cannot be too well or
widely known, and there is reason to believe they are very
imperfectly known, even to the comparatively few usually
well-informed on all subjects relating to the important interests
of the country, whose minds have been engrossed by
other more directly pressing, though not more important,
subjects.</p>
        <p>There is a matter connected with this subject, too important
to be passed over without special notice. We allude to
the want of rolling-mill workmen. Everything else may be
possessed in abundance, but bar iron cannot be made without
competent workmen. The possession of a sufficient
number of these is indispensable for any considerable increase
in the production. There are barely enough of these
workmen for the present limited business, and there are but
few in the country, unless they are in the army. If they
<pb id="mitch10" n="10"/>
are there, we think that systematic steps should be taken to
ascertain where they are, so that they may be detailed where
they are most needed. The comparatively few men of this
class, who would hardly be missed from the ranks, could
render the country better service in making iron, doubtless
than ten times their number in the army. If they cannot
be obtained in this way in sufficient numbers, we would
suggest the importance of measures to induce them to come
from abroad, and to retain them here. We have no doubt
of the entire practicability of this, if proper and judicious
agents were sent abroad empowered to give satisfactory
guarantees of perfect exemption from all military service,
and prepared to offer pecuniary inducements, such as our
enemies do not hesitate to do for men far less valuable and
important to them. If they can afford to lavish millions of
dollars, not to procure artisans necessary to their service,
but to lure to their ranks of death, to be hurled against our
citizen-soldiers, thousands and tens of thousands of stalwart
peasants of Ireland and other countries, cannot our Government,
in aid of its sacred cause, in comparison with which
more money should be counted as dross—can it not afford
to expend the amount, whatever it may be, necessary to
obtain and secure such number of competent artisans as its
service absolutely and imperatively demands? Men of this
class, more, probably, than can be found in the Confederacy,
ARE INDISPENSABLE; and, in our judgment, no pains or expense
should be spared to obtain them, with as little delay
as possible.</p>
        <p>While on this subject, we would call attention to some
important matters relating to it, which seem to require authoritative
attention. Rolling-mill workmen are a somewhat
peculiar class. They are hard-working men. We
would not go among them to find criminals nor law-breakers.
There is a sympathy among them toward each other
amounting almost to clanishness. They do not meddle much
with public or governmental affairs, and are, probably more
cosmopolitical than almost any other class. Where their
business is, there is their country. There are, of course,
exceptions in this case, as in all general rules. These allusions
are necessary for a proper comprehension of the force
of what follows. Knowing the importance of men of this
class to us, our enemies, it is stated, have adopted a course
intended and well calculated to draw them away, and these
efforts have not been without considerable success. At
least many of those men have left, some doubtless under
enticements from the enemy, and some from apprehensions
<pb id="mitch11" n="11"/>
of conscription (unacquainted with the laws on the subject);
or, as there is reason to believe, to escape the frequent annoyances
of over-stringent enrolling or conscripting officers.
Be this as it may, it is certain that these officers have caused
much, and, it is believed, unnecessary annoyance to persons
and Companies engaged in manufacturing iron, and their
employees. In this way, doubtless without intending it,
they have seconded the schemes of the enemy to deprive us
of these valuable men. We have information, deemed reliable,
that a circular, under high authority from the enemy,
has been circulated among rolling-mill workmen offering a
large pecuniary reward and other inducements to such of
them as would leave this country and go to the enemy, the
main motive, of course, being to deprive us of their services.
Under this double influence of repulsion and attraction, it
is not to be wondered at that many of these men should have
disappeared from this country. One of these forces may
be neutralized and the other should be contracted, if possible.</p>
        <closer><salute>Very respectfully, yours,</salute>
<signed><name>A. T. JONES,</name> President;
<lb/><name>J. W. LAPSLEY,</name>
<lb/><name>J. M. McCLANAHAN,</name>
<lb/><name>HORACE WARE,</name>
<lb/><name>E. T. WATTS,</name>
<lb/>Directors.</signed> </closer>
      </div1>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI.2>