<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite.dtd" [
<!ENTITY % external-entities SYSTEM "./extEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY % internal-entities SYSTEM "./intEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY douglfp SYSTEM "douglfp.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY dougltp SYSTEM "dougltp.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY douglvs SYSTEM "douglvs.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY douglbk SYSTEM "douglbk.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY douglcv SYSTEM "douglcv.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
]>
<TEI.2>
  <teiHeader type="" status="new">
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title><emph>NARRATIVE OF THE LIFE OF FREDERICK DOUGLASS,</emph> 
<emph>AN AMERICAN SLAVE. Written by Himself: </emph>
Electronic Edition.</title>
        <author>Frederick Douglass, 1818-1895</author>
        <funder>Funding from the National Endowment for the Humanities
 supported the electronic publication of this title.</funder>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text scanned (OCR) by</resp>
          <name id="cg">Sarah Reuning</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Images scanned by</resp>
          <name>Carlene Hempel</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
          <name id="ns">Carlene Hempel and Natalia Smith</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <editionStmt>
        <edition>First edition, <date>1999</date></edition>
      </editionStmt>
      <extent>ca. 300K</extent>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>Academic Affairs Library, UNC-CH</publisher>
        <pubPlace>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, </pubPlace>
        <date>1999.</date>
        <availability status="unknown">
          <p>© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina 
at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, 
teaching and personal use as long as this statement of availability 
is included in the text.</p>
        </availability>
      </publicationStmt>
      <notesStmt>
        <note anchored="yes">Call number E 449 D746 1845 
(Murrey Atkins Library, UNC-Charlotte)</note>
      </notesStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
<title>Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave</title>
<author>Douglass, Frederick</author><imprint><pubPlace>Boston</pubPlace><publisher>Anti-Slavery Office, No. 25 Cornell</publisher><date>1845</date></imprint></bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <projectDesc>
        <p>The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-CH
digitization project, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South, Beginnings to 1920.</hi></p>
      </projectDesc>
      <editorialDecl>
        <p>Any hyphens occurring in line breaks have been 
removed, and the trailing part of a word has been joined to 
the preceding line.</p>
        <p>All quotation marks and ampersand have been transcribed as
entity references.</p>
        <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as ” and “
respectively.</p>
        <p>All single right and left quotation marks are encoded as ’ 
and ‘ respectively.</p>
        <p>Indentation in lines has not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Running titles have not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Spell-check and verification made against printed text using 
Author/Editor (SoftQuad) and Microsoft Word spell check programs.</p>
      </editorialDecl>
      <classDecl>
        <taxonomy id="lcsh">
          <bibl>
            <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings,</title>
            <edition>21st edition, 1999</edition>
          </bibl>
        </taxonomy>
      </classDecl>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <langUsage>
        <language id="fr">French</language>
      </langUsage>
      <textClass>
        <keywords scheme="lcsh">
          <list type="simple">
            <item>Douglass, Frederick, 1818-1895.</item>
            <item>African Americans -- Maryland -- Biography.</item>
            <item>African American abolitionists -- Biography.</item>
            <item>Abolitionists -- United States -- Biography.</item>
            <item>Slaves -- Maryland -- Biography.</item>
            <item>Fugitive slaves -- Maryland -- Biography.</item>
            <item>Slavery -- Maryland -- History -- 19th century.</item>
            <item>Slavery -- United States -- History -- 19th century.</item>
            <item>Plantation life -- Maryland -- History -- 19th century.</item>
            <item>Slaves -- Maryland -- Social conditions -- 19th century.</item>
            <item>Slaves' writings, American -- Maryland.</item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change>
        <date>1999-03-17,</date>
        <respStmt>
          <name> Celine Noel and Wanda Gunther </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> revised TEIHeader and created catalog 
record for the electronic edition.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1999-02-26, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Natalia Smith, </name>
          <resp>project manager, </resp>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished TEI-conformant encoding and final proofing.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1999-02-19, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Carlene Hempel</name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> finished TEI/SGML encoding</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1999-01-29, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Sarah Reuning</name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> finished scanning (OCR) and proofing.</item>
      </change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <front>
      <div1 type="cover image">
        <p>
          <figure id="cover" entity="douglcv">
            <p>[Cover Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="frontispiece image">
        <p>
          <figure id="frontis" entity="douglfp">
            <p>Frederick Douglass<lb/>[Frontispiece Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="title page image">
        <p>
          <figure id="title" entity="dougltp">
            <p>[Title Page Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="title page verso image">
        <p>
          <figure id="verso" entity="douglvs">
            <p>[Title Page Verso Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <titlePage>
        <docTitle>
          <titlePart type="main">NARRATIVE
<lb/>
OF THE
<lb/>
LIFE
<lb/>
OF
<lb/>
FREDERICK DOUGLASS,
<lb/>
AN
<lb/>
AMERICAN SLAVE.</titlePart>
        </docTitle>
        <docAuthor>WRITTEN BY HIMSELF.</docAuthor>
        <docImprint><pubPlace>BOSTON:</pubPlace>
<publisher>PUBLISHED AT THE ANTI-SLAVERY OFFICE,<lb/>
No. 25 CORNHILL</publisher>
<docDate>1845.</docDate></docImprint>
        <pb id="douglassverso" n="verso"/>
        <docImprint>Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1845,
<lb/>
BY FREDERERICK DOUGLASS,
<lb/>
In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of Massachusetts.</docImprint>
      </titlePage>
      <div1 type="preface">
        <pb id="douglassiii" n="iii"/>
        <head>PREFACE.</head>
        <p>IN the month of August, 1841, I attended an
antislavery convention in Nantucket, at which it was my
happiness to become acquainted with FREDERICK
DOUGLASS, the writer of the following Narrative.
He was a stranger to nearly every member of that body;
but, having recently made his escape from the southern
prison-house of bondage, and feeling his curiosity excited
to ascertain the principles and measures of the
abolitionists,—of whom he had heard a somewhat vague
description while he was a slave,—he was induced to give
his attendance, on the occasion alluded to, though at that
time a resident in New Bedford.</p>
        <p>Fortunate, most fortunate occurrence!—fortunate
for the millions of his manacled brethren, yet panting
for deliverance from their awful thraldom!—fortunate
for the cause of negro emancipation, and of universal
liberty!—fortunate for the land of his birth, which he
has already done so much to save and bless!—fortunate
for a large circle of friends and acquaintances,
whose sympathy and affection he has strongly secured
by the many sufferings he has endured, by his virtuous
traits of character, by his ever-abiding remembrance
of those who are in bonds, as being bound with them!
—fortunate for the multitudes, in various parts of our
republic, whose minds he has enlightened on the subject
of slavery, and who have been melted to tears by
his pathos, or roused to virtuous indignation by his stirring
eloquence against the enslavers of men!—fortunate
for himself, as it at once brought him into the
<pb id="douglassiv" n="iv"/>
field of public usefulness, “gave the world assurance of a
MAN,” quickened the slumbering energies of his soul, and
consecrated him to the great work of breaking the rod of
the oppressor, and letting the oppressed go free!</p>
        <p>I shall never forget his first speech at the convention—the
extraordinary emotion it excited in my own mind—the
powerful impression it created upon a crowded auditory,
completely taken by surprise—the applause which
followed from the beginning to the end of his
felicitous remarks. I think I never hated slavery so
intensely as at that moment; certainly, my perception
of the enormous outrage which is inflicted by it, on
the godlike nature of its victims, was rendered far more
clear than ever. There stood one, in physical proportion
and stature commanding and exact—in intellect richly
endowed—in natural eloquence a prodigy—in soul manifestly
“created but a little lower than the angels”—yet a slave,
ay, a fugitive slave,—trembling for his safety, hardly daring
to believe that on the American soil, a single white person
could be found who would befriend him at all hazards, for
the love of God and humanity! Capable of high attainments as
an intellectual and moral being—needing nothing but a
comparatively small amount of cultivation to make him an
ornament to society and a blessing to his race
—by the law of the land, by the voice of the people,
by the terms of the slave code, he was only a piece of 
property, a beast of burden, a chattel personal, nevertheless!</p>
        <p>A beloved friend from New Bedford prevailed on Mr.
DOUGLASS to address the convention. He came forward
to the platform with a hesitancy and embarrassment,
necessarily the attendants of a sensitive mind in such a
novel position. After apologizing for his
ignorance, and reminding the audience that slavery
was a poor school for the human intellect and heart,
<pb id="douglassv" n="v"/>
he proceeded to narrate some of the facts in his own
history as a slave, and in the course of his speech gave
utterance to many noble thoughts and thrilling reflections.
As soon as he had taken his seat, filled with
hope and admiration, I rose, and declared that PATRICK
HENRY, of revolutionary fame, never made a speech
more eloquent in the cause of liberty, than the one we
had just listened to from the lips of that hunted fugitive.
So I believed at that time,—such is my belief
now. I reminded the audience of the peril which surrounded
this self-emancipated young man at the North,
—even in Massachusetts, on the soil of the Pilgrim
Fathers, among the descendants of revolutionary sires; and
I appealed to them, whether they would ever allow him to
be carried back into slavery,—law or no law,
constitution or no constitution. The response was
unanimous and in thunder-tones—“NO!” “Will you
succor and protect him as a brother-man—a resident of
the old Bay State?” “YES!” shouted the whole mass, with
an energy so startling, that the ruthless tyrants south of
Mason and Dixon's line might almost have heard the
mighty burst of feeling, and recognized it as the pledge of
an invincible determination, on the part of those who gave
it, never to betray him that wanders, but to hide the
outcast, and firmly to abide the consequences.</p>
        <p>It was at once deeply impressed upon my mind, that,
if Mr. DOUGLASS could be persuaded to consecrate his
time and talents to the promotion of the anti-slavery
enterprise, a powerful impetus would be given to it, and a
stunning blow at the same time inflicted on northern
prejudice against a colored complexion. I therefore
endeavored to instil hope and courage into his mind, in
order that he might dare to engage in a vocation so
anomalous and responsible for a person in his situation;
and I was seconded in this effort by warm-hearted friends,
especially by the late General
<pb id="douglassvi" n="vi"/>
Agent of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society, Mr.
JOHN A. COLLINS, whose judgment in this instance entirely
coincided with my own. At first, he could give no
encouragement; with unfeigned diffidence, he expressed his
conviction that he was not adequate to the performance of
so great a task; the path marked out was wholly an
untrodden one; he was sincerely apprehensive that he
should do more harm than good. After much deliberation,
however, he consented to make a trial; and ever since that
period, he has acted as a lecturing agent, under the
auspices either of the American or the Massachusetts
Anti-Slavery Society. In labors he has been most
abundant; and his success in combating prejudice, in
gaining proselytes, in agitating the public mind, has far
surpassed the most sanguine expectations that were raised
at the commencement of his brilliant career. He has borne
himself with gentleness and meekness, yet with true
manliness of character. As a public speaker, he excels in
pathos, wit, comparison, imitation, strength of reasoning,
and fluency of language. There is in him that union of
head and heart, which is indispensable to an enlightenment
of the heads and a winning of the hearts of others. May his
strength continue to be equal to his day! May he continue
to “grow in grace, and in the knowledge of God,” that he
may be increasingly serviceable in the cause of bleeding
humanity, whether at home or abroad!</p>
        <p>It is certainly a very remarkable fact, that one of the
most efficient advocates of the slave population, now
before the public, is a fugitive slave, in the person of
FREDERICK DOUGLASS; and that the free colored population of
the United States are as ably represented by one of their
own number, in the person of CHARLES LENOX
REMOND, whose eloquent appeals have extorted the
highest applause of multitudes on both sides of the
Atlantic. Let the calumniators of the colored
<pb id="douglassvii" n="vii"/>
race despise themselves for their baseness and illiberality
of spirit, and henceforth cease to talk of the natural
inferiority of those who require nothing but time and
opportunity to attain to the highest point of human
excellence.</p>
        <p>It may, perhaps, be fairly questioned, whether any
other portion of the population of the earth could have
endured the privations, sufferings and horrors of slavery,
without having become more degraded in the scale of
humanity than the slaves of African descent. Nothing has
been left undone to cripple their intellects, darken their
minds, debase their moral nature, obliterate all traces of
their relationship to mankind; and yet how wonderfully
they have sustained the mighty load of a most frightful
bondage, under which they have been groaning for
centuries! To illustrate the effect of slavery on the white
man,—to show that he has no powers of endurance, in such
a condition, superior to those of his black brother, —
DANIEL O'CONNELL, the distinguished advocate of
universal emancipation, and the mightiest champion of
prostrate but not conquered Ireland, relates the following
anecdote in a speech delivered by him in the Conciliation
Hall, Dublin, before the Loyal National Repeal
Association, March 31, 1845. “No matter,” said Mr.
O'CONNELL, “under what specious term it may disguise
itself, slavery is still hideous. <hi rend="italics">It has a natural, an inevitable
tendency to brutalize every noble faculty of man.</hi> An
American sailor, who was cast away on the shore of
Africa, where he was kept in slavery for three years, was,
at the expiration of that period, found to be imbruted and
stultified—he had lost all reasoning power; and having
forgotten his native language, could only utter some savage
gibberish between Arabic and English, which nobody could
understand, and which even he himself found difficulty in
pronouncing. So much for the humanizing influence of 
THE DOMESTIC INSTITUTION!”
<pb id="douglassviii" n="viii"/>
Admitting this to have been an extraordinary case of mental
deterioration, it proves at least that the white slave can sink as
low in the scale of humanity as the black one.</p>
        <p>Mr. DOUGLASS has very properly chosen to write his own
Narrative, in his own style, and according to the best of his
ability, rather than to employ some one else. It
is, therefore, entirely his own production; and, considering
how long and dark was the career he had to run as a slave,
—how few have been his opportunities to
improve his mind since he broke his iron fetters
—it is, in my judgment, highly creditable to his head and
heart. He who can peruse it without a tearful eye, a
heaving breast, an afflicted spirit,—without being
filled with an unutterable abhorrence of slavery and
all its abettors, and animated with a determination to
seek the immediate overthrow of that execrable system,
—without trembling for the fate of this country
in the hands of a righteous God, who is ever on the
side of the oppressed, and whose arm is not shortened
that it cannot save,—must have a flinty heart, and be
qualified to act the part of a trafficker “in slaves and
the souls of men.” I am confident that it is essentially
true in all its statements; that nothing has been
set down in malice, nothing exaggerated, nothing drawn
from the imagination; that it comes short of the reality,
rather than overstates a single fact in regard to
SLAVERY AS IT IS. The experience of FREDERICK
DOUGLASS, as a slave, was not a peculiar one; his lot
was not especially a hard one; his case may be regarded
as a very fair specimen of the treatment of
slaves in Maryland, in which State it is conceded that they
are better fed and less cruelly treated than in Georgia,
Alabama, or Louisiana. Many have suffered incomparably
more, while very few on the plantations have suffered less,
than himself. Yet how deplorable was his situation! what
terrible chastisements were
<pb id="douglassix" n="ix"/>
inflicted upon his person! what still more shocking
outrages were perpetrated upon his mind! with all his
noble powers and sublime aspirations, how like a brute
was he treated, even by those professing to have the same
mind in them that was in Christ Jesus! to what
dreadful liabilities was he continually subjected! how
destitute of friendly counsel and aid, even in his
greatest extremities! how heavy was the midnight of woe
which shrouded in blackness the last ray of hope,
and filled the future with terror and gloom! what longings
after freedom took possession of his breast,
and how his misery augmented, in proportion as he grew
reflective and intelligent,—thus demonstrating that a
happy slave is an extinct man! how he thought, reasoned,
felt, under the lash of the driver, with the
chains upon his limbs! what perils he encountered in his
endeavors to escape from his horrible doom! and how
signal have been his deliverance and preservation in the midst of a
nation of pitiless enemies!</p>
        <p>This Narrative contains many affecting incidents,
many passages of great eloquence and power; but I think
the most thrilling one of them all is the description
DOUGLASS gives of his feelings, as he stood soliloquizing
respecting his fate, and the chances of his one
day being a freeman, on the banks of the Chesapeake Bay
—viewing the receding vessels as they flew
with their white wings before the breeze, and apostrophizing
them as animated by the living spirit of freedom. Who can read
that passage, and be insensible
to its pathos and sublimity? Compressed into it is a
whole Alexandrian library of thought, feeling, and
sentiment—all that can, all that need be urged, in the form
of expostulation, entreaty, rebuke, against that
crime of crimes,—making man the property of his
fellow-man! O, how accursed is that system, which entombs the
godlike mind of man, defaces the divine image, reduces
those who by creation were crowned
<pb id="douglassx" n="x"/>
with glory and honor to a level with four-footed beasts,
and exalts the dealer in human flesh above all that is called
God! Why should its existence be prolonged one hour? Is
it not evil, only evil, and that continually? What does its
presence imply but the absence of all fear of God, all
regard for man, on the part of the people of the United
States? Heaven speed its eternal overthrow!</p>
        <p>So profoundly ignorant of the nature of slavery are many
persons, that they are stubbornly incredulous whenever
they read or listen to any recital of the cruelties which are
daily inflicted on its victims. They do not deny that the 
slaves are held as property; but that terrible fact seems to
convey to their minds no idea of injustice, exposure to
outrage, or savage barbarity. Tell them of cruel scourgings,
of mutilations and brandings, of scenes of pollution and
blood, of the banishment of all light and knowledge, and
they affect to be greatly indignant at such enormous 
exaggerations, such wholesale misstatements, such abominable
libels on the character of the southern planters! As
if all these direful outrages were not the natural results
of slavery! As if it were less cruel to reduce a human
being to the condition of a thing, than to give him
a severe flagellation, or to deprive him of necessary
food and clothing! As if whips, chains, thumb-screws,
paddles, bloodhounds, overseers, drivers, patrols, were
not all indispensable to keep the slaves down, and to
give protection to their ruthless oppressors! As if,
when the marriage institution is abolished, concubinage,
adultery, and incest, must not necessarily abound; when
all the rights of humanity are annihilated, any barrier
remains to protect the victim from the fury of the
spoiler; when absolute power is assumed over life and
liberty, it will not be wielded with destructive sway!
Skeptics of this character abound in society. In some
few instances, their incredulity arises from a want of
<pb id="douglassxi" n="xi"/>
reflection; but, generally, it indicates a hatred of the light,
a desire to shield slavery from the assaults of its foes, a
contempt of the colored race, whether bond or free. Such
will try to discredit the shocking tales of slaveholding
cruelty which are recorded in this truthful Narrative; but
they will labor in vain. Mr. DOUGLASS has frankly disclosed
the place of his birth, the names of those who claimed
ownership in his body and soul, and the names also of
those who committed the crimes which he has alleged
against them. His statements, therefore, may easily be
disproved, if they are untrue.</p>
        <p>In the course of his Narrative, he relates two instances
of murderous cruelty,—in one of which a planter
deliberately shot a slave belonging to a neighboring
plantation, who had unintentionally gotten within his
lordly domain in quest of fish; and in the other, an
overseer blew out the brains of a slave who had fled to a
stream of water to escape a bloody scourging. Mr.
DOUGLASS states that in neither of these instances was any
thing done by way of legal arrest or judicial investigation.
The Baltimore American, of March 17, 1845, relates a
similar case of atrocity, perpetrated with similar impunity
—as follows:—“<hi rend="italics">Shooting a Slave.</hi>—We learn, upon the
authority of a letter from Charles county, Maryland,
received by a gentleman of this city, that a young man,
named Matthews, a nephew of General Matthews, and
whose father, it is believed, holds an office at Washington,
killed one of the slaves upon his father's farm by shooting
him. The letter states that young Matthews had been left
in charge of the farm; that he gave an order to the servant,
which was disobeyed, when he proceeded to the house,
<hi rend="italics">obtained a gun, and, returning, shot the servant.</hi> He
immediately, the letter continues, fled to his father's
residence, where he still remains unmolested.”—Let it never
be forgotten, that no slaveholder or
<pb id="douglassxii" n="xii"/>
overseer can be convicted of any outrage perpetrated on
the person of a slave, however diabolical it may be, on the
testimony of colored witnesses, whether bond or free. By
the slave code, they are adjudged to be as incompetent to
testify against a white man, as though they were indeed a
part of the brute creation. Hence, there is no legal
protection in fact, whatever there may be in form, for the
slave population; and any amount of cruelty may be
inflicted on them with impunity. Is it possible for the
human mind to conceive of a more horrible state of
society?</p>
        <p>The effect of a religious profession on the conduct of
southern masters is vividly described in the following
Narrative, and shown to be any thing but salutary. In the
nature of the case, it must be in the highest degree
pernicious. The testimony of Mr. DOUGLASS, on
this point, is sustained by a cloud of witnesses, whose
veracity is unimpeachable. “A slaveholder's profession of
Christianity is a palpable imposture. He is a
felon of the highest grade. He is a man-stealer. It is of no
importance what you put in the other scale.”</p>
        <p>Reader! are you with the man-stealers in sympathy
and purpose, or on the side of their down-trodden victims?
If with the former, then are you the foe of God and man.
If with the latter, what are you prepared to do and dare in
their behalf? Be faithful, be vigilant, be untiring in your
efforts to break every yoke, and let the oppressed go free.
Come what may—cost what it may—inscribe on the banner
which you unfurl to the breeze, as your religious and political motto 
—“NO COMPROMISE WITH SLAVERY! NO UNION WITH
SLAVEHOLDERS!”</p>
        <closer><signed>WM. LLOYD GARRISON.</signed>
<dateline><date>BOSTON, <hi rend="italics">May</hi> 1, 1845.</date></dateline></closer>
      </div1>
      <pb id="douglassxiii" n="xiii"/>
      <div1 type="letter">
        <head>LETTER</head>
        <head>FROM WENDELL PHILLIPS, ESQ.</head>
        <q direct="unspecified">
          <text>
            <body>
              <div1 type="letter">
                <opener><dateline><date>BOSTON, <hi rend="italics">April 22</hi>, 1845.</date></dateline>
<salute>My Dear Friend:</salute></opener>
                <p>You remember the old fable of “The Man and
the Lion,” where the lion complained that he should
not be so misrepresented “when the lions write
history.”</p>
                <p>I am glad the time has come when the “lions write
history.” We have been left long enough to gather
character of slavery from the involuntary evidence of the
masters. One might, indeed, rest sufficiently satisfied with
what, it is evident, must be, in general the results of such
a relation, without seeking farther to find whether they
have followed in every instance. Indeed, those who stare
at the half-peck of corn a week, and love to count the
lashes on the slave's back, are seldom the “stuff ” out of
which reformers and abolitionists are to be made. I
remember that, in 1838, many were waiting for the results
of the West India experiment, before they could come
into our ranks. Those “results” have come long ago; but, alas! few of
that number have come with them, as converts. A man must
be disposed to judge of emancipation by other tests
than whether it has increased the produce of sugar,—and
to hate slavery for other reasons because it starves
men and whips, women,—before he is ready to lay the
first stone of his anti-slavery life<corr>.</corr>
<pb id="douglassxiv" n="xiv"/>
I was glad to learn, in your story, how early the most
neglected of God's children waken to a sense of their
rights, and of the injustice done them. Experience is a keen
teacher; and long before you had mastered your A B C, or
knew where the “white sails” of the Chesapeake were
bound, you began, I see, to gauge the wretchedness of the
slave, not by his hunger and want, not by his lashes and
toil, but by the cruel and blighting death which gathers
over his soul.</p>
                <p>In connection with this, there is one circumstance
which makes your recollections peculiarly valuable, and
renders your early insight the more remarkable. You come
from that part of the country where we are told slavery
appears with its fairest features. Let us hear, then, what it
is at its best estate—gaze on its bright side, if it has one;
and then imagination may task her powers to add dark
lines to the picture, as she travels southward to that (for
the colored man) Valley of the Shadow of Death, where
the Mississippi sweeps along.</p>
                <p>Again, we have known you long, and can put the most
entire confidence in your truth, candor, and sincerity.
Every one who has heard you speak has felt, and, I am
confident, every one who reads your book will feel,
persuaded that you give them a fair specimen of the whole
truth. No one-sided portrait,—no wholesale complaints,—
but strict justice done, whenever individual kindliness has
neutralized, for a moment, the deadly system with which
it was strangely allied. You have been with us, too, some
years, and can fairly compare the twilight of rights, which
your race enjoy at the North, with that “noon of night”
under which they labor south of Mason and Dixon's line.
Tell us whether, after all, the half-free colored man of
Massachusetts is worse off than the pampered slave of
the rice swamps!</p>
                <p>In reading your life, no one can say that we have
<pb id="douglassxv" n="xv"/>
unfairly picked out some rare specimens of cruelty. We
know that the bitter drops, which even you have drained
from the cup, are no incidental aggravations, no individual
ills, but such as must mingle always and necessarily in the
lot of every slave. They are the essential ingredients, not
the occasional results, of the system.</p>
                <p>After all, I shall read your book with trembling for you.
Some years ago, when you were beginning to tell me your
real name and birthplace, you may remember I stopped
you, and preferred to remain ignorant of all. With the
exception of a vague description, so I continued, till the
other day, when you read me your memoirs. I hardly
knew, at the time, whether to thank you or not for the
sight of them, when I reflected that it was still dangerous,
in Massachusetts, for honest men to tell their names!
They say the fathers, in 1776, signed the Declaration of
Independence with the halter about their necks. You, too,
publish your declaration of freedom with danger
compassing you around. In all the broad lands which the
Constitution of the United States overshadows, there is
no single spot,—however narrow or desolate,—where
a fugitive slave can plant himself and say, “I am safe.”
The whole armory of Northern Law has no shield for you.
I am free to say that, in your place, I should throw the
MS. into the fire.</p>
                <p>You, perhaps, may tell your story in safety, endeared
as you are to so many warm hearts by rare gifts, and a
still rarer devotion of them to the service of others. But it
will be owing only to your labors, and the fearless efforts
of those who, trampling the laws and Constitution of
the country under their feet, are determined that they will
“hide the outcast,” and that their hearths shall be, spite of
the law, an asylum for the oppressed, if, some time or
other, the humblest may stand in our
<pb id="douglassxvi" n="xvi"/>
streets, and bear witness in safety against the cruelties
of which he has been the victim.</p>
                <p>Yet it is sad to think, that these very throbbing hearts
which welcome your story, and form your best safeguard
in telling it, are all beating contrary to the “statute in such
case made and provided.” Go on, my dear friend, till you,
and those who, like you, have been saved, so as by fire,
from the dark prison-house, shall stereotype these free,
illegal pulses into statutes; and New England, cutting
loose from a blood-stained Union, shall glory in being the
house of refuge for the oppressed;—till we no longer
merely “<hi rend="italics">hide</hi> the outcast,” or make a merit of standing
idly by while he is hunted in our midst; but, consecrating
anew the soil of the Pilgrims as an asylum for the
oppressed, proclaim our <hi rend="italics">welcome</hi> to the slave so loudly,
that the tones shall reach every hut in the Carolinas, and
make the broken-hearted bondman leap up at the thought
of old Massachusetts.</p>
                <p>God speed the day!</p>
                <closer><salute>Till then, and ever,
<lb/>
Yours truly,</salute>
<signed>WENDELL PHILLIPS.</signed>
<salute>FREDERICK DOUGLASS.</salute></closer>
              </div1>
            </body>
          </text>
        </q>
      </div1>
    </front>
    <body>
      <div1 type="chapter">
        <pb id="douglass1" n="1"/>
        <head>CHAPTER I.</head>
        <p>I WAS born in Tuckahoe, near Hillsborough, and
about twelve miles from Easton, in Talbot county,
Maryland. I have no accurate knowledge of my age,
never having seen any authentic record containing it. By
far the larger part of the slaves know as little of their ages
as horses know of theirs, and it is the wish of most
masters within my knowledge to keep their slaves thus
ignorant. I do not remember to have ever met a slave who
could tell of his birthday. They seldom come nearer to it
than planting-time, harvest-time, cherry-time, spring-time,
or fall-time. A want of information concerning my own
was a source of unhappiness to me even during childhood.
The white children could tell their ages. I could not tell
why I ought to be deprived of the same privilege. I was
not allowed to make any inquiries of my master concerning
it. He deemed all such inquiries on the part
of a slave improper and impertinent, and evidence of
<pb id="douglass2" n="2"/>
a restless spirit. The nearest estimate I can give makes me
now between twenty-seven and twenty-eight years of age.
I come to this, from hearing my master say,
some time during 1835, I was about seventeen years old.</p>
        <p>My mother was named Harriet Bailey. She was the
daughter of Isaac and Betsey Bailey, both colored, and
quite dark. My mother was of a darker complexion than
either my grandmother or grandfather.</p>
        <p>My father was a white man. He was admitted to be such
by all I ever heard speak of my parentage. The opinion
was also whispered that my master was my father; but of
the correctness of this opinion, I know nothing; the means
of knowing was withheld from me. My mother and I were
separated when I was but an infant—before I knew her as
my mother. It is a common custom, in the part of
Maryland from which I ran away, to part children from
their mothers at a very early age. Frequently, before the
child has reached its twelfth month, its mother is taken
from it, and hired out on some farm a considerable distance
off, and the child is placed under the care of an old woman,
too old for field labor. For what this separation is done, I
do not know, unless it be to hinder the development of the
child's affection toward its mother, and to blunt and
destroy the natural affection of the mother for the child.
This is the inevitable result.</p>
        <p>I never saw my mother, to know her as such, more than
four or five times in my life; and each of these times was
very short in duration, and at night. She was hired by a
Mr. Stewart, who lived about twelve
<pb id="douglass3" n="3"/>
miles from my home. She made her journeys to see me in
the night, travelling the whole distance on foot, after the
performance of her day's work. She was a field hand, and a
whipping is the penalty of not being in the field at sunrise,
unless a slave has special permission from his or her master
to the contrary—a permission which they seldom get, and
one that gives to him that gives it the proud name of being a
kind master. I do not recollect of ever seeing my mother by
the light of day. She was with me in the night. She would lie
down with me, and get me to sleep, but long before I waked
she was gone. Very little communication ever took place
between us. Death soon ended what little we could have
while she lived, and with it her hardships and suffering. She
died when I was about seven years old, on one of my
master's farms, near Lee's Mill. I was not allowed to be
present during her illness, at her death, or burial. She was
gone long before I knew any thing about it. Never having
enjoyed, to any considerable extent, her soothing presence,
her tender and watchful care, I received the tidings of her
death with much the same emotions I should have probably
felt at the death of a stranger.</p>
        <p>Called thus suddenly away, she left me without the
slightest intimation of who my father was. The whisper
that my master was my father, may or may not be true;
and, true or false, it is of but little consequence to my
purpose whilst the fact remains, in all its glaring
odiousness, that slaveholders have ordained, and by law
established, that the children of slave women shall in all
cases follow the condition of their
<pb id="douglass4" n="4"/>
mothers; and this is done too obviously to administer to
their own lusts, and make a gratification of their wicked
desires profitable as well as pleasurable; for by this
cunning arrangement, the slaveholder, in cases not a few,
sustains to his slaves the double relation of master and father.</p>
        <p>I know of such cases; and it is worthy of remark that such slaves
invariably suffer greater hardships, and have more to
contend with, than others. They are, in the first place, a
constant offence to their mistress. She is ever disposed to
find fault with them; they can seldom do any thing to
please her; she is never better pleased than when she sees
them under the lash, especially when she suspects her
husband of showing to his mulatto children favors which
he withholds from his black slaves. The master is
frequently compelled to sell this class of his slaves, out of
deference to the feelings of his white wife; and, cruel as
the deed may strike any one to be, for a man to sell his
own children to human flesh-mongers, it is often the
dictate of humanity for him to do so; for, unless he does
this, he must not only whip them himself, but must stand
by and see one white son tie up his brother, of but few
shades darker complexion than himself, and ply the
gory lash to his naked back; and if he lisp one word of
disapproval, it is set down to his parental partiality,
and only makes a bad matter worse, both for
himself and the slave whom he would protect and
defend.</p>
        <p>Every year brings with it multitudes of this class of
slaves. It was doubtless in consequence of a knowledge
of this fact, that one great statesman of the south
<pb id="douglass5" n="5"/>
predicted the downfall of slavery by the inevitable laws of
population. Whether this prophecy is ever fulfilled, or not,
it is nevertheless plain that a very different-looking class of
people are springing up at the south, and are now held in
slavery, from those originally brought to this country from
Africa; and if their increase will do no other good, it will do
away the force of the argument, that God cursed Ham, and
therefore American slavery is right. If the lineal
descendants of Ham are alone to be scripturally enslaved,
it is certain that slavery at the south must soon become
unscriptural; for thousands are ushered into the world,
annually, who, like myself, owe their existence to white
fathers, and those fathers most frequently their own
masters.</p>
        <p>I have had two masters. My first master's name was
Anthony. I do not remember his first name. He was
generally called Captain Anthony—a title which, I
presume, he acquired by sailing a craft on the Chesapeake
Bay. He was not considered a rich slaveholder. He owned
two or three farms, and about thirty slaves. His farms and
slaves were under the care of an overseer. The overseer's
name was Plummer. Mr. Plummer was a miserable
drunkard, a profane swearer, and a savage monster. He
always went armed with a cowskin and a heavy cudgel. I
have known him to cut and slash the women's heads so
horribly, that even master would be enraged at his cruelty,
and would threaten to whip him if he did not mind himself.
Master, however, was not a humane slaveholder. It
required extraordinary barbarity on the part of an
overseer to affect him. He was a cruel
<pb id="douglass6" n="6"/>
man, hardened by a long life of slaveholding. He would at
times seem to take great pleasure in whipping a slave. I
have often been awakened at the dawn of
day by the most heart-rending shrieks of an own aunt
of mine, whom he used to tie up to a joist, and whip
upon her naked back till she was literally covered
with blood. No words, no tears, no prayers, from his gory
victim, seemed to move his iron heart from its bloody
purpose. The louder she screamed, the harder he whipped;
and where the blood ran fastest, there he whipped
longest. He would whip her to make her scream, and whip
her to make her hush; and not until overcome by fatigue,
would he cease to swing the blood-clotted cowskin. I
remember the first time I ever witnessed this horrible
exhibition. I was quite a child, but I well remember it. I
never shall forget it whilst I remember any thing. It was
the first of a long series of such outrages, of which I was
doomed to be a witness and a participant. It struck me
with awful force. It was the blood-stained gate, the
entrance to the hell of slavery, through which I was about
to pass. It was a most terrible spectacle. I wish I could
commit to paper the feelings with which I beheld it.</p>
        <p>This occurrence took place very soon after I went to
live with my old master, and under the following
circumstances. Aunt Hester went out one night,—where or
for what I do not know,—and happened to be absent
when my master desired her presence. He had ordered her
not to go out evenings, and warned her that she must
never let him catch her in company with a young man,
who was paying attention to her,
<pb id="douglass7" n="7"/>
belonging to Colonel Lloyd. The young man's name was
Ned Roberts, generally called Lloyd's Ned. Why master
was so careful of her, may be safely left to conjecture. She
was a woman of noble form, and of graceful proportions,
having very few equals, and fewer superiors, in personal
appearance, among the colored or white women of our
neighborhood.</p>
        <p>Aunt Hester had not only disobeyed his orders in going
out, but had been found in company with Lloyd's Ned;
which circumstance, I found, from what he said while
whipping her, was the chief offence. Had he been a man of
pure morals himself, he might have been thought interested
in protecting the innocence of my aunt; but those who
knew him will not suspect him of any such virtue. Before
he commenced whipping Aunt Hester, he took her into the
kitchen, and stripped her from neck to waist, leaving her
neck, shoulders, and back, entirely naked. He then told her
to cross her hands, calling her at the same time a d—d b—h.
After crossing her hands, he tied them with a strong rope,
and led her to a stool under a large hook in the joist, put in
for the purpose. He made her get upon the stool, and tied
her hands to the hook. She now stood fair for his infernal
purpose. Her arms were stretched up at their full length, so
that she stood upon the ends of her toes. He then said to
her, “Now, you d—d b—h, I'll learn you how to disobey my
orders!” and after rolling up his sleeves, be commenced to
lay on the heavy cowskin, and soon the warm, red blood
(amid heart-rending shrieks from her, and horrid oaths from
him) came dripping to the floor. I was so terrified and
horror-stricken at the
<pb id="douglass8" n="8"/>
sight, that I hid myself in a closet, and dared not
venture out till long after the bloody transaction was over.
I expected it would be my turn next. It was all new to me.
I had never seen any thing like it before. I had always
lived with my grandmother on the outskirts of the
plantation, where she was put to raise the children of the
younger women. I had therefore been, until now, out of
the way of the bloody scenes that often occurred on the
plantation.</p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="chapter">
        <head>CHAPTER II.</head>
        <p>My master's family consisted of two sons, Andrew and
Richard; one daughter, Lucretia, and her husband, Captain
Thomas Auld. They lived in one house, upon the home
plantation of Colonel Edward Lloyd. My master was
Colonel Lloyd's clerk and superintendent. He was what
might be called the overseer of the overseers. I spent two
years of childhood on this plantation in my old master's
family. It was here that I witnessed the bloody
transaction recorded in the first chapter; and as I received
my first impressions of slavery on this plantation,
I will give some description of
it, and of slavery as it there existed. The plantation is
about twelve miles north of Easton, in Talbot county, and
is situated on the border of Miles River. The principal
products raised upon it were tobacco, corn, and wheat.
These were raised in great abundance;
<pb id="douglass9" n="9"/>
so that, with the products of this and the other
farms belonging to him, he was able to keep in almost
constant employment a large sloop, in carrying them to
market at Baltimore. This sloop was named Sally Lloyd,
in honor of one of the colonel's daughters. My master's
son-in-law, Captain Auld, was master of the vessel; she
was otherwise manned by the colonel's own slaves. Their
names were Peter, Isaac, Rich, and Jake. These were
esteemed very highly by the other slaves, and looked
upon as the privileged ones of the plantation; for it was no
small affair, in the eyes of the slaves, to be allowed to see
Baltimore.</p>
        <p>Colonel Lloyd kept from three to four hundred slaves
on his home plantation, and owned a large number more on
the neighboring farms belonging to him. The names of the
farms nearest to the home plantation were Wye Town and
New Design. “Wye Town” was under the overseership of
a man named Noah Willis. New Design was under the
overseership of a Mr. Townsend. The overseers of these,
and all the rest of the farms, numbering over twenty,
received advice and direction from the managers of the
home plantation. This was the great business place. It was
the seat of government for the whole twenty farms. All
disputes among the overseers were settled here. If a slave
was convicted of any high misdemeanor, became
unmanageable, or evinced a determination to run away, he
was brought immediately here, severely whipped, put on
board the sloop, carried to Baltimore, and sold to Austin
Woolfolk, or some other slave-trader, as a warning to the
slaves remaining.</p>
        <p>Here, too, the slaves of all the other farms received
<pb id="douglass10" n="10"/>
their monthly allowance of food, and their yearly
clothing. The men and women slaves received, as their
monthly allowance of food, eight pounds of pork, or its
equivalent in fish, and one bushel of corn meal Their yearly
clothing consisted of two coarse linen shirts, one pair of
linen trousers, like the shirts, one jacket, one pair of
trousers for winter, made of coarse negro cloth, one pair of
stockings, and one pair of shoes; the whole of which could
not have cost more than seven dollars. The allowance of
the slave children was given to their mothers, or the old
women having the care of them. The children unable to
work in the field had neither shoes, stockings, jackets, nor
trousers, given to them; their clothing consisted of two
coarse linen shirts per year. When these failed them, they
went naked until the next allowance-day. Children from
seven to ten years old, of both sexes, almost naked, might
be seen at all seasons of the year.</p>
        <p>There were no beds given the slaves, unless one coarse
blanket be considered such, and none but the men and
women had these. This, however, is not considered a very
great privation. They find less difficulty from the want of
beds, than from the want of time to sleep; for when their
day's work in the field is done, the most of them having
their washing, mending, and cooking to do, and having few
or none of the ordinary facilities for doing either of these,
very many of their sleeping hours are consumed in
preparing for the field the coming day; and when this is
done, old and young, male and female, married and
single, drop down side by side, on one common bed,—the
cold, damp floor,—each covering himself or herself
<pb id="douglass11" n="11"/>
with their miserable blankets; and here they sleep till they
are summoned to the field by the driver's horn. At the
sound of this, all must rise, and be off to the field. There
must be no halting; every one must be at his or her post;
and woe betides them who hear not this morning summons
to the field; for if they are not awakened by the sense of
hearing, they are by the sense of feeling: no age nor sex
finds any favor. Mr. Severe, the overseer, used to stand by
the door of the quarter, armed with a large hickory stick
and heavy cowskin, ready to whip any one who was so
unfortunate as not to hear, or, from any other cause, was
prevented from being ready to start for the field at the
sound of the horn.</p>
        <p>Mr. Severe was rightly named: he was a cruel man. I
have seen him whip a woman, causing the blood to run
half an hour at the time; and this, too, in the midst of her
crying children, pleading for their mother's release. He
seemed to take pleasure in manifesting his fiendish
barbarity. Added to his cruelty, he was a profane swearer.
It was enough to chill the blood and stiffen the hair of an
ordinary man to hear him talk. Scarce a sentence escaped
him but that was commenced or concluded by some horrid
oath. The field was the place to witness his cruelty and
profanity. His presence made it both the field of blood and
of blasphemy. From the rising till the going down of the
sun, he was cursing, raving, cutting, and slashing among the
slaves of the field, in the most frightful manner. His career
was short. He died very soon after I went to Colonel
Lloyd's; and he died as he lived, uttering, with his dying
groans, bitter
<pb id="douglass12" n="12"/>
curses and horrid oaths. His death was regarded by the
slaves as the result of a merciful providence.</p>
        <p>Mr. Severe's place was filled by a Mr. Hopkins. He
was a very different man. He was less cruel, less profane,
and made less noise, than Mr. Severe. His course was
characterized by no extraordinary demonstrations of
cruelty. He whipped, but seemed to take no pleasure in
it. He was called by the slaves a good overseer.</p>
        <p>The home plantation of Colonel Lloyd wore the
appearance of a country village. All the mechanical
operations for all the farms were performed here. The
shoemaking and mending, the blacksmithing, cartwrighting,
coopering, weaving, and grain-grinding, were all performed
by the slaves on the home plantation. The whole place
wore a business-like aspect very unlike the neighboring
farms. The number of houses, too, conspired to give it
advantage over the neighboring farms. It was called by the slaves the
<hi rend="italics">Great House Farm</hi>. Few privileges were esteemed higher,
by the slaves of the out-farms, than that of
being selected to do errands at the Great House Farm.
It was associated in their minds with greatness. A
representative could not be prouder of his election to a
seat in the American Congress, than a slave on one of
the out-farms would be of his election to do errands at
the Great House Farm. They regarded it as evidence of 
great confidence reposed in them by their
overseers; and it was on this account, as well as a
constant desire to be out of the field from under the
driver's lash, that they esteemed it a high privilege, one
worth careful living for. He was called the smartest
<pb id="douglass13" n="13"/>
and most trusty fellow, who had this honor conferred
upon him the most frequently. The competitors for this
office sought as diligently to please their overseers, as the
office-seekers in the political parties seek to please and
deceive the people. The same traits of character might be
seen in Colonel Lloyd's slaves, as are seen in the slaves of
the political parties.</p>
        <p>The slaves selected to go to the Great House Farm, for
the monthly allowance for themselves and their
fellow-slaves, were peculiarly enthusiastic. While on their way,
they would make the dense old woods, for miles around,
reverberate with their wild songs, revealing
at once the highest joy and the deepest sadness.
They would compose and sing as they went along,
consulting neither time nor tune. The thought that came up,
came out—if not in the word, in the sound;
—and as frequently in the one as in the other. They
would sometimes sing the most pathetic sentiment in the
most rapturous tone, and the most rapturous sentiment in
the most pathetic tone. Into all of their songs they would
manage to weave something of the Great House Farm.
Especially would they do this, when leaving home. They
would then sing most exultingly the following words:—
<q direct="unspecified"><lg type="quote"><l>“I am going away to the Great House Farm! </l><l>O, yea! O, yea! O!”</l></lg></q>
This they would sing, as a chorus, to words which to
many would seem unmeaning jargon, but which,
nevertheless, were full of meaning to themselves. I have
sometimes thought that the mere hearing of those songs
would do more to impress some minds with the
<pb id="douglass14" n="14"/>
horrible character of slavery, than the reading of whole
volumes of philosophy on the subject could do.</p>
        <p>I did not, when a slave, understand the deep meaning
of those rude and apparently incoherent songs.
I was myself within the circle; so that I neither saw
nor heard as those without might see and hear. They
told a tale of woe which was then altogether beyond
my feeble comprehension; they were tones loud, long, and
deep; they breathed the prayer and complaint of souls
boiling over with the bitterest anguish. Every tone was a
testimony against slavery, and a prayer to God for
deliverance from chains. The hearing of those wild notes
always depressed my spirit, and filled me with ineffable
sadness. I have frequently found myself in tears while
hearing them. The mere recurrence to those songs, even
now, afflicts me; and while I am writing these lines, an
expression of feeling has already found its way down my
cheek. To those songs I trace my first glimmering
conception of the dehumanizing character of slavery. I can
never get rid of that conception. Those songs still follow
me, to deepen my hatred of slavery, and quicken my sympathies
for my brethren in bonds. If any one wishes to be
impressed with the soul-killing effects of slavery, let him go
to Colonel Lloyd's plantation, and, on allowance-day, place
himself in the deep pine woods, and there let him, in
silence, analyze the sounds that shall pass through the
chambers of his soul,—and if he is not thus impressed, it
will only be because “there is no flesh in his obdurate
heart.”</p>
        <p>I have often been utterly astonished, since I came to
the north, to find persons who could speak of the singing, 
<pb id="douglass15" n="15"/>
among slaves, as evidence of their contentment
and happiness. It is impossible to conceive of a greater
mistake. Slaves sing most when they are most unhappy.
The songs of the slave represent the sorrows of his heart;
and he is relieved by them, only as an aching heart is
relieved by its tears. At least, such is my experience. I have
often sung to drown my sorrow, but seldom to express my
happiness. Crying for joy, and singing for joy, were alike
uncommon to me while in the jaws of slavery. The singing
of a man cast away upon a desolate island might be as
appropriately considered as evidence of contentment and
happiness, as the singing of a slave; the songs of the one
and of the other are prompted by the same emotion.</p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="chapter">
        <head>CHAPTER III.</head>
        <p>COLONEL LLOYD kept a large and finely cultivated
garden, which afforded almost constant employment for
four men, besides the chief gardener, (Mr. M'Durmond.)
This garden was probably the greatest attraction of
the place. During the summer months, people came from
far and near—from Baltimore, Easton, and Annapolis—to see
it. It abounded in fruits of almost every description, from
the hardy apple of the north to the delicate orange of the
south. This garden was not the least source of trouble on
the plantation. Its excellent fruit was quite a temptation to the hungry
<pb id="douglass16" n="16"/>
swarms of boys, as well as the older slaves, belonging to
the colonel, few of whom had the virtue or the vice to
resist it. Scarcely a day passed, during the summer, but
that some slave had to take the lash for stealing fruit. The
colonel had to resort to all kinds of stratagems to keep his
slaves out of the garden. The last most successful one
was that of tarring his fence all around; after which,
if a slave was caught with any tar upon his person,
it was deemed sufficient proof that
he had either been into the garden, or had tried to get
in. In either case, he was severely whipped by the
chief gardener. This plan worked well; the slaves became
as fearful of <hi rend="italics">tar</hi> as of the lash. They seemed to realize the
impossibility of touching tar without being defiled.</p>
        <p>The colonel also kept a splendid riding equipage. His
stable and carriage-house presented the appearance of
some of our large city livery establishments. His horses
were of the finest form and noblest blood. His carriage-house
contained three splendid coaches, three or four gigs,
besides dearborns and barouches of the most fashionable
style.</p>
        <p>This establishment was under the care of two slaves—
old Barney and young Barney—father and son. To attend
to this establishment was their sole work. But it was by
no means an easy employment; for in nothing was Colonel
Lloyd more particular than in the management of his
horses. The slightest inattention to these was
unpardonable, and was visited upon those, under whose
care they were placed, with the severest punishment; no
excuse could shield them, if the colonel only suspected any
want of attention to his
<pb id="douglass17" n="17"/>
horses—a supposition which he frequently indulged, and
one which, of course, made the office of old and young
Barney a very trying one. They never knew
when they were safe from punishment. They were
frequently whipped when least deserving, and escaped
whipping when most deserving it. Every thing depended
upon the looks of the horses, and the state of Colonel
Lloyd's own mind when his horses were brought to him for
use. If a horse did not move fast enough, or hold his head
high enough, it was owing to some fault of his keepers. It
was painful to stand near the stable-door, and hear the
various complaints against the keepers when a horse was
taken out for use. “This horse has not had proper attention.
He has not been sufficiently rubbed and curried, or he has
not been properly fed; his food was too wet or too dry; he
got it too soon or too late; he was too hot or too cold; he
had too much hay, and not enough of grain; or he had too
much grain, and not enough of hay; instead of old Barney's
attending to the horse, he had very improperly left it to his
son.” To all these complaints, no matter how unjust, the
slave must answer never a word. Colonel Lloyd could not
brook any contradiction from a slave. When he spoke, a
slave must stand, listen, and tremble; and such was literally
the case. I have seen Colonel Lloyd make old Barney, a man
between fifty and sixty years of age, uncover his bald head,
kneel down upon the cold, damp ground, and receive upon
his naked and toil-worn shoulders more than thirty lashes at
the time. Colonel Lloyd had three sons—Edward, Murray,
and Daniel,—and three sons-in-law, Mr. Winder, Mr.
Nicholson, and Mr.
<pb id="douglass18" n="18"/>
Lowndes. All of these lived at the Great House
Farm, and enjoyed the luxury of whipping the servants when
they pleased, from old Barney down to William
Wilkes, the coach-driver. I have seen Winder make
one of the house-servants stand off
from him a suitable distance to be touched with the end of his
whip, and at every stroke raise great ridges upon his back.</p>
        <p>To describe the wealth of Colonel Lloyd would be
almost equal to describing the riches of Job. He kept
from ten to fifteen house-servants. He was said to
own a thousand slaves, and I think this estimate quite
within the truth. Colonel Lloyd owned so many that
he did not know them when he saw them; nor did all
the slaves of the out-farms know him. It is reported
of him, that, while riding along the road one day, he met
a colored man, and addressed him in the usual manner
of speaking to colored people on the public highways
of the south: “Well, boy, whom do you belong to?”
“To Colonel Lloyd,” replied the slave. “Well, does
the colonel treat you well?” “No, sir,” was the
ready reply. “What, does he work you too hard?”
“Yea, sir.” “Well, don't he give you enough to eat?”
“Yes, sir, he gives me enough, such as it is.”</p>
        <p>The colonel, after ascertaining where the slave belonged,
rode on; the man also went on about his
business, not dreaming that be had been conversing
with his master. He thought, said, and heard nothing
more of the matter, until two or three weeks afterwards.
The poor man was then informed by his overseer that,
for having found fault with his master, he
was now to be sold to a Georgia trader. He was 
immediately chained and handcuffed; and thus, without a
<pb id="douglass19" n="19"/>
moment's warning, he was snatched away, and forever
sundered, from his family and friends, by a hand more
unrelenting than death. This is the penalty of telling the
truth, of telling the simple truth, in answer to a series of
plain questions.</p>
        <p>It is partly in consequence of such facts, that slaves,
when inquired of as to their condition and the character of
their masters, almost universally say they are contented, and
that their masters are kind. The slaveholders have been
known to send in spies among their slaves, to ascertain their
views and feelings in regard to their condition. The
frequency of this has had the effect to establish among the
slaves the maxim, that a still tongue makes a wise head.
They suppress the truth rather than take the consequences
of telling it, and in so doing prove themselves a part of the
human family. If they have any thing to say of their masters,
it is generally in their masters' favor, especially when
speaking to an untried man. I have been frequently asked,
when a slave, if I had a kind master, and do not remember
ever to have given a negative answer; nor did I, in pursuing
this course, consider myself as uttering what was absolutely
false; for I always measured the kindness of my master by
the standard of kindness set up among slaveholders around
us. Moreover, slaves are like other people, and imbibe
prejudices quite common to others. They think their own
better than that of others. Many, under the influence of this
prejudice, think their own masters are better than the
masters of other slaves; and this, too, in some cases, when
the very reverse is true. Indeed, it is not uncommon for
slaves even to fall out and
<pb id="douglass20" n="20"/>
quarrel among themselves about the relative goodness of
their masters, each contending for the superior goodness of
his own over that of the others. At the very same time,
they mutually execrate their masters when viewed
separately. It was so on our plantation. When Colonel
Lloyd's slaves met the slaves of Jacob Jepson, they seldom
parted without a quarrel about their masters; Colonel
Lloyd's slaves contending that he was the richest, and Mr.
Jepson's slaves that he was the smartest, and most of a
man. Colonel Lloyd's slaves would boast his ability to buy
and sell Jacob Jepson. Mr. Jepson's slaves would boast his
ability to whip Colonel Lloyd. These quarrels would
almost always end in a fight between the parties, and those
that whipped were supposed to have gained the point at
issue. They seemed to think that the greatness of their
masters was transferable to themselves. It was considered
as being bad enough to be a slave; but to be a poor man's
slave was deemed a disgrace indeed!</p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="chapter">
        <head>CHAPTER IV.</head>
        <p>MR. HOPKINS remained but a short time in the office
of overseer. Why his career was so short, I do not
know, but suppose he lacked the necessary severity to
suit Colonel Lloyd. Mr. Hopkins was succeeded by
Mr. Austin Gore, a man possessing, in an eminent
degree, all those traits of character indispensable to
<pb id="douglass21" n="21"/>
what is called a first-rate overseer. Mr. Gore had served
Colonel Lloyd, in the capacity of overseer, upon one of the
out-farms, and had shown himself worthy of the high
station of overseer upon the home or Great House Farm.
Mr. Gore was proud, ambitious, and persevering. He was
artful, cruel, and obdurate. He was just the man for such a
place, and it was just the place for such a man. It afforded
scope for the full exercise of all his powers, and he seemed
to be perfectly at home in it. He was one of those who
could torture the slightest look, word, or gesture, on the
part of the slave, into impudence, and would treat it accordingly.
There must be no answering back to him; no explanation
was allowed a slave, showing himself to have
been wrongfully accused. Mr. Gore acted fully up to the
maxim laid down by slaveholders,—“It is
better that a dozen slaves suffer under the lash, than that
the overseer should be convicted, in the presence of the
slaves, of having been at fault.” No matter how innocent a
slave might be—it availed him nothing, when accused by
Mr. Gore of any misdemeanor. To be accused
was to be convicted, and to be convicted was
to be punished; the one always following the other
with immutable certainty. To escape punishment was to
escape accusation; and few slaves had the fortune to do
either, under the overseership of Mr. Gore. He
was just proud enough to demand the most debasing
homage of the slave, and quite servile enough to crouch,
himself, at the feet of the master. He was ambitious
enough to be contented with nothing short of the highest
rank of overseers, and persevering enough to reach the
height of his ambition. He was
<pb id="douglass22" n="22"/>
cruel enough to inflict the severest punishment, artful
enough to descend to the lowest trickery, and obdurate
enough to be insensible to the voice of a reproving
conscience. He was, of all the overseers, the most dreaded
by the slaves. His presence was painful; his eye flashed
confusion; and seldom was his sharp, shrill voice heard,
without producing horror and trembling in their ranks.</p>
        <p>Mr. Gore was a grave man, and, though a young man, he
indulged in no jokes, said no funny words, seldom smiled.
His words were in perfect keeping with his looks, and his
looks were in perfect keeping with his words. Overseers
will sometimes indulge in a witty word, even with the
slaves; not so with Mr. Gore. He spoke but to command,
and commanded but to be obeyed; he dealt sparingly with
his words, and bountifully with his whip, never using the
former where the latter would answer as well. When he
whipped, he seemed to do so from a sense of duty, and
feared no consequences. He did nothing reluctantly, no
matter how disagreeable; always at his post, never
inconsistent. He never promised but to fulfil. He was, in a
word, a man of the most inflexible firmness and stone-like
coolness.</p>
        <p>His savage barbarity was equalled only by the
consummate coolness with which he committed the
grossest and most savage deeds upon the slaves under his
charge. Mr. Gore once undertook to whip one of Colonel
Lloyd's slaves, by the name of Demby. He had given
Demby but few stripes, when, to get rid of the scourging,
he ran and plunged himself into a creek, and stood there at
the depth of his shoulders, refusing to come out.
<pb id="douglass23" n="23"/>
Mr. Gore told him that he would give him three calls, and
that, if he did not come out at the third call, he would
shoot him. The first call was given. Demby made no
response, but stood his ground. The second and third calls
were given with the same result. Mr. Gore then, without
consultation or deliberation with any one, not even giving
Demby an additional call, raised his musket to his face,
taking deadly aim at his standing victim, and in an instant
poor Demby was no more. His mangled body sank out of
sight, and blood and brains marked the water where he had
stood.</p>
        <p>A thrill of horror flashed through every soul upon the
plantation, excepting Mr. Gore. He alone seemed cool and
collected. He was asked by Colonel Lloyd and my old
master, why he resorted to this extraordinary expedient.
His reply was, (as well as I can remember,) that Demby had
become unmanageable. He was setting a dangerous
example to the other slaves,—one which, if suffered to
pass without some such demonstration on his part, would
finally lead to the total subversion of all rule and order
upon the plantation. He argued that if one slave refused to
be corrected, and escaped with his life, the other slaves
would soon copy the example; the result of which would
be, the freedom of the slaves, and the enslavement of the
whites. Mr. Gore's defence was satisfactory. He was
continued in his station as overseer upon the home
plantation. His fame as an overseer went abroad. His
horrid crime was not even submitted to judicial
investigation. It was committed in the presence of slaves,
and they of course could neither institute a suit, nor
testify against him; and thus the guilty perpetrator of one
of the
<pb id="douglass24" n="24"/>
bloodiest and most foul murders goes unwhipped of
justice, and uncensured by the community in which he
lives. Mr. Gore lived in St. Michael's, Talbot county,
Maryland, when I left there; and if he is still alive, he
very probably lives there now; and if so, he is now, as he
was then, as highly esteemed and as much respected as
though his guilty soul had not been stained with his
brother's blood.</p>
        <p>I speak advisedly when I say this,—that killing a slave,
or any colored person, in Talbot county, Maryland, is not
treated as a crime, either by the courts or the community.
Mr. Thomas Lanman, of St. Michael's, killed two slaves,
one of whom he killed with a hatchet, by knocking his
brains out. He used to boast of the commission
of the awful and bloody deed. I have heard him do so
laughingly, saying, among other things, that he was the
only benefactor of his country in the company, and that
when others would do as much as he had done, we
should be relieved of “the d—d niggers.”</p>
        <p>The wife of Mr. Giles Hick, living but a short distance
from where I used to live, murdered my wife's cousin, a
young girl between fifteen and sixteen years
of age, mangling her person in the most horrible manner,
breaking her nose and breastbone with a stick, so that the
poor girl expired in a few hours afterward. She was
immediately buried, but had not been in her untimely
grave but a few hours before she was taken up and
examined by the coroner, who decided that she had come
to her death by severe beating. The offence for which this
girl was thus murdered was this:—
She had been set that night to mind Mrs. Hick's baby,
<pb id="douglass25" n="25"/>
and during the night she fell asleep, and the baby cried.
She, having lost her rest for several nights previous, did
not hear the crying. They were both in the room with
Mrs. Hicks. Mrs. Hicks, finding the girl slow to move,
jumped from her bed, seized an oak stick of wood by the
fireplace, and with it broke the girl's nose and breastbone,
and thus ended her life. I will not say that this most horrid
murder produced no sensation in the community. It did
produce sensation, but not enough to bring the murderess
to punishment. There was a warrant issued for her arrest,
but it was never served. Thus she escaped not only
punishment, but even the pain of being arraigned before a
court for her horrid crime.</p>
        <p>Whilst I am detailing bloody deeds which took place
during my stay on Colonel Lloyd's plantation, I will
briefly narrate another, which occurred about the same
time as the murder of Demby by Mr. Gore.</p>
        <p>Colonel Lloyd's slaves were in the habit of spending a
part of their nights and Sundays in fishing for oysters, and
in this way made up the deficiency of their scanty
allowance. An old man belonging to Colonel Lloyd, while
thus engaged, happened to get beyond the limits of
Colonel Lloyd's, and on the premises of Mr. Beal Bondly.
At this trespass, Mr. Bondly took offence, and with his
musket came down to the shore, and blew its deadly
contents into the poor old man.</p>
        <p>Mr. Bondly came over to see Colonel Lloyd the next
day, whether to pay him for his property, or to justify
himself in what he had done, I know not. At any rate, this
whole fiendish transaction was soon
<pb id="douglass26" n="26"/>
hushed up. There was very little said about it at all, and
nothing done. It was a common saying, even
among little white boys, that it was worth a half-cent to
kill a “nigger,” and a half-cent to bury one.</p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="chapter">
        <head>CHAPTER V.</head>
        <p>As to my own treatment while I lived on Colonel
Lloyd's plantation, it was very similar to that of the other
slave children. I was not old enough to work in the field,
and there being little else than field work to do, I had a
great deal of leisure time. The most I had to do was to drive
up the cows at evening, keep the fowls out of the garden,
keep the front yard clean, and run of errands for my old
master's daughter, Mrs. Lucretia Auld. The most of my
leisure time I spent in helping Master Daniel Lloyd in
finding his birds, after he had shot them. My connection
with Master Daniel was of some advantage to me. He
became quite attached to me, and was a sort of protector
of me. He would not allow the older boys to impose upon
me, and would divide his cakes with me.</p>
        <p>I was seldom whipped by my old master, and suffered
little from any thing else than hunger and cold. I suffered
much from hunger, but much more from cold. In hottest
summer and coldest winter, I was kept almost naked—no
shoes, no stockings, no jacket, no trousers, nothing on but
a coarse tow linen shirt, reaching
<pb id="douglass27" n="27"/>
only to my knees. I had no bed. I must have perished
with cold, but that, the coldest nights, I used to steal a bag
which was used for carrying corn to the mill. I would
crawl into this bag, and there sleep on the cold, damp, clay
floor, with my head in and feet out. My feet have been so
cracked with the frost, that the pen with which I am
writing might be laid in the gashes.</p>
        <p>We were not regularly allowanced. Our food was coarse
corn meal boiled. This was called <hi rend="italics">mush</hi>. It was put into a
large wooden tray or trough, and set down upon the
ground. The children were then called, like so many pigs,
and like so many pigs they would come and devour the
mush; some with oyster-shells, others with pieces of
shingle, some with naked hands, and none with spoons.
He that ate fastest got most; he that was strongest
secured the best place; and few left the trough satisfied.</p>
        <p>I was probably between seven and eight years old when
I left Colonel Lloyd's plantation. I left it with joy. I shall
never forget the ecstasy with which I received the
intelligence that my old master (Anthony) had determined
to let me go to Baltimore, to live with Mr. Hugh Auld,
brother to my old master's son-in-law, Captain Thomas
Auld. I received this information about three days before
my departure. They were three of the happiest days I
ever enjoyed. I spent the most part of all these three days
in the creek, washing off the plantation scurf, and
preparing myself for my departure.</p>
        <p>The pride of appearance which this would indicate was
not my own. I spent the time in washing, not so
<pb id="douglass28" n="28"/>
much because I wished to, but because Mrs. Lucretia had
told me I must get all the dead skin off my feet
and knees before I could go to Baltimore; for the people in Baltimore
were very cleanly, and would laugh at me if I looked dirty.
Besides, she was going to give me a pair or trousers,
which I should not put on unless I got all the dirt off me.
The thought of owning a pair of trousers was great indeed!
It was almost a sufficient motive, not only to make me take
off what would be called by pig-drovers the mange,
but the skin itself. I went at it in good earnest, working
for the first time with the hope of reward.</p>
        <p>The ties that ordinarily bind children to their homes
were all suspended in my case. I found no severe trial in
my departure. My home was charmless; it was not home
to me; on parting from it, I could not feel that I was leaving
any thing which I could have enjoyed by staying.
My mother was dead, my grandmother lived far off, so that I seldom saw her.
I had two sisters and one brother, that lived in the same
house with me; but the early separation of us from
our mother had well nigh blotted the fact of our relationship
from our memories. I looked for home elsewhere, and was
confident of finding none which I should relish
less than the one which I was leaving.
If, however, I found in my new home hardship, hunger,
whipping, and nakedness, I had the consolation
that I should not have escaped any one of them by staying.
Having already had more than a taste of them
in the house of my old master, and having
endured them there, I very naturally inferred my
ability to endure them elsewhere, and especially at
Baltimore;
<pb id="douglass29" n="29"/>
for I had something of the feeling about Baltimore that
is expressed in the proverb, that “being hanged in
England is preferable to dying a natural death in Ireland.”
I had the strongest desire to see Baltimore.
Cousin Tom, though not fluent in speech, had inspired
me with that desire by his eloquent description of the
place. I could never point out any thing at the Great
House, no matter how beautiful or powerful, but that
he had seen something at Baltimore far exceeding, both
in beauty and strength, the object which I pointed out
to him. Even the Great House itself, with all its
pictures, was far inferior to many buildings in Baltimore.
So strong was my desire, that I thought a
gratification of it would fully compensate for whatever
loss of comforts I should sustain by the exchange.
I left without a regret, and with the highest hopes of
future happiness.</p>
        <p>We sailed out of Miles River for Baltimore on a
Saturday morning. I remember only the day of the week,
for at that time I had no knowledge of the days of the
month, nor the months of the year. On setting sail, I
walked aft, and gave to Colonel Lloyd's plantation what I
hoped would be the last look. I then placed myself in the
bows of the sloop, and there spent the remainder of the
day in looking ahead, interesting myself in what was in the
distance rather than in things nearby or behind.</p>
        <p>In the afternoon of that day, we reached Annapolis, the
capital of the State. We stopped but a few moments so
that I had no time to go on shore. It was the first large
town that I had ever seen, and though it would look
small compared with some of our New
<pb id="douglass30" n="30"/>
England factory villages, I thought it a wonderful place
for its size—more imposing even than the Great House
Farm!</p>
        <p>We arrived at Baltimore early on Sunday morning,
landing at Smith's Wharf, not far from Bowley's Wharf.
We had on board the sloop a large flock of sheep; and
after aiding in driving them to the slaughterhouse of Mr.
Curtis on Louden Slater's Hill, I was conducted by Rich,
one of the hands belonging on board of the sloop, to my
new home in Alliciana Street, near Mr. Gardner's
ship-yard, on Fells Point.</p>
        <p>Mr. and Mrs. Auld were both at home, and met me at
the door with their little son Thomas, to take care of
whom I had been given. And here I saw what I had never
seen before; it was a white face beaming with the most
kindly emotions; it was the face of my new mistress,
Sophia Auld. I wish I could describe the rapture that
flashed through my soul as I beheld it. It was a new and
strange sight to me, brightening up
my pathway with the light of happiness. Little Thomas
was told, there was his Freddy,—and I was told to take
care of little Thomas; and thus I entered upon the duties
of my new home with the most cheering prospect ahead.</p>
        <p>I look upon my departure from Colonel Lloyd's
plantation as one of the most interesting events of my
life. It is possible, and even quite probable, that but for
the mere circumstance of being removed from that
plantation to Baltimore, I should have to-day, instead of
being here seated by my own table, in the enjoyment of
freedom and the happiness of home, writing this
Narrative, been confined in the galling
<pb id="douglass31" n="31"/>
chains of slavery. Going to live at Baltimore laid the
foundation, and opened the gateway, to all my subsequent
prosperity. I have ever regarded it as the first plain
manifestation of that kind providence which has ever since
attended me, and marked my life with so many favors. I
regarded the selection of myself as being somewhat
remarkable. There were a number of slave children that
might have been sent from the plantation to Baltimore.
There were those younger, those older, and those of the
same age. I was chosen from among them all, and was the
first, last, and only choice.</p>
        <p>I may be deemed superstitions, and even egotistical, in
regarding this event as a special interposition of divine
Providence in my favor. But I should be false to the
earliest sentiments of my soul, if I suppressed the opinion.
I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of
incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false, and
incur my own abhorrence. From my earliest recollection, I
date the entertainment of a deep conviction that slavery
would not always be able to hold me within its foul
embrace; and in the darkest hours of my career in slavery,
this living word of faith and spirit of hope departed not
from me, but remained like ministering angels to cheer me
through the gloom. This good spirit was from God, and to
him I offer thanksgiving and praise.</p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="chapter">
        <pb id="douglass32" n="32"/>
        <head>CHAPTER VI.</head>
        <p>My new mistress. proved to be all she appeared when I
first met her at the door,—a woman of the kindest heart
and finest feelings. She had never had a slave under her
control previously to myself, and prior to her marriage she
had been dependent upon her own industry for a living.
She was by trade a weaver; and by constant application to
her business, she had been in a good degree preserved from
the blighting and dehumanizing effects of slavery. I was
utterly astonished at her goodness. I scarcely knew how
to behave towards her. She was entirely unlike any other
white woman I had ever seen. I could not approach her as
I was accustomed to approach other white ladies. My
early instruction was all out of place. The crouching
servility, usually so acceptable a quality in a slave, did not
answer when manifested toward her. Her favor was not
gained by it; she seemed to be disturbed by it. She did not
deem it impudent or unmannerly for a slave to look her in
the face. The meanest slave was put fully at ease in her
presence, and none left without feeling better for having
seen her. Her face was made of heavenly smiles, and her
voice of tranquil music.</p>
        <p>But, alas! this kind heart had but a short time to remain
such. The fatal poison of irresponsible power was already
in her hands, and soon commenced its infernal work. That
cheerful eye, under the influence of slavery, soon became
red with rage; that voice,
<pb id="douglass33" n="33"/>
made all of sweet accord, changed to one of harsh and
horrid discord; and that angelic face gave place to that of a
demon.</p>
        <p>Very soon after I went to live with Mr. and Mrs. Auld,
she very kindly commenced to teach me the A, B, C.
After I had learned this, she assisted me in learning to
spell words of three or four letters. Just at this point of
my progress, Mr. Auld found out what was going on, and
at once forbade Mrs. Auld to instruct me further, telling
her, among other things, that it was
unlawful, as well as unsafe, to teach a slave to read. To use
his own words, further, he said, “If you give a nigger an
inch, he will take an ell. A nigger should know nothing but
to obey his master—to do as he is told to do. Learning
would <hi rend="italics">spoil</hi> the best nigger in the world. Now,” said he,
“if you teach that nigger (speaking of myself) how to read,
there would be no keeping him. It would forever unfit him to be a slave. He
would at once become unmanageable, and of no value to
his master. As to himself, it could do him no
good, but a great deal of harm. It would make him
discontented and unhappy.” These words sank deep into
my heart, stirred up sentiments within that lay
slumbering, and called into existence an entirely new train
of thought. It was a new and special revelation, explaining
dark and mysterious things, with which my youthful
understanding had struggled, but struggled in vain. I now
understood what had been to me a most perplexing
difficulty—to wit, the white man's power to enslave the
black man. It was a grand achievement,
and I prized it highly. From that moment, I understood
the pathway from slavery to freedom. It was
<pb id="douglass34" n="34"/>
just what I wanted, and I got it at a time when I the least
expected it. Whilst I was saddened by the thought of losing
the aid of my kind mistress, I was gladdened by the
invaluable instruction which, by the merest accident, I had
gained from my master. Though conscious of the difficulty
of learning without a teacher, I set out with high hope, and
a fixed purpose, at whatever cost of trouble, to learn how
to read. The very decided manner with which he spoke,
and strove to impress his wife with the evil consequences
of giving me instruction, served to convince me that he was
deeply sensible of the truths he was uttering. It gave me
the best assurance that I might rely with the utmost
confidence on the results which, he said, would flow from
teaching me to read. What he most dreaded, that I most
desired. What he most loved, that I most hated. That which
to him was a great evil, to be carefully shunned, was to me
a great good, to be diligently sought; and the argument
which he so warmly urged, against my learning to read, only
served to inspire me with a desire and determination to
learn. In learning to read, I owe almost as much to the bitter
opposition of my master, as to the kindly aid of my
mistress. I acknowledge the benefit of both.</p>
        <p>I had resided but a short time in Baltimore before I
observed a marked difference, in the treatment of slaves,
from that which I had witnessed in the country. A city
slave is almost a freeman, compared with a slave on the
plantation. He is much better fed and clothed, and enjoys
privileges altogether unknown to the slave on the
plantation. There is a vestige of decency, a sense of shame,
that does much to curb and
<pb id="douglass35" n="35"/>
check those outbreaks of atrocious cruelty so commonly
enacted upon the plantation. He is a desperate
slaveholder, who will shock the humanity of his
non-slaveholding neighbors with the cries of his lacerated
slave. Few are willing to incur the odium attaching to the
reputation of being a cruel master; and above all things,
they would not be known as not giving a slave enough to
eat. Every city slaveholder is anxious to have it known of
him, that he feeds his slaves well;
and it is due to them to say, that most of them do give
their slaves enough to eat. There are, however, some
painful exceptions to this rule. Directly opposite to us, on
Philpot Street, lived Mr. Thomas Hamilton. He owned
two slaves. Their names were Henrietta and Mary.
Henrietta was about twenty-two years of age,
Mary was about fourteen; and of all the mangled and
emaciated creatures I ever looked upon, these two
were the most so. His heart must be harder than stone,
that could look upon these unmoved. The head, neck, and
shoulders of Mary were literally cut to
pieces. I have frequently felt her head, and found it nearly
covered with festering sores, caused by the
lash of her cruel mistress. I do not know that her master
ever whipped her, but I have been an eye-witness
to the cruelty of Mrs. Hamilton. I used to be in Mr.
Hamilton's house nearly every day. Mrs. Hamilton used
to sit in a large chair in the middle of the room, with a
heavy cowskin always by her side, and scarce an hour
passed during the day but was marked by the blood of one
of these slaves. The girls seldom passed her without her
saying, “Move faster, you <hi rend="italics">black gip</hi>!” at the same time
giving them a blow with the cowskin
<pb id="douglass36" n="36"/>
over the head or shoulders, often drawing the blood.
She would then say, “Take that, you <hi rend="italics">black gip</hi>!”—
continuing, “If you don't move faster, I'll move you!”
Added to the cruel lashings to which these slaves were
subjected, they were kept nearly half-starved. They
seldom knew what it was to eat a full meal. I have seen
Mary contending with the pigs for the offal thrown into
the street. So much was Mary kicked and cut to pieces,
that she was oftener called “<hi rend="italics">pecked</hi>” than by her name.</p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="chapter">
        <head>CHAPTER VII.</head>
        <p>I LIVED in Master Hugh's family about seven years.
During this time, I succeeded in learning to read and write.
In accomplishing this, I was compelled to resort to various
stratagems. I had no regular teacher. My mistress, who
had kindly commenced to instruct me, had, in compliance
with the advice and direction of her husband, not only
ceased to instruct, but had set her face against my being
instructed by any one else. It is due, however, to my
mistress to say of her, that she did not adopt this course
of treatment immediately. She at first lacked the depravity
indispensable to shutting me up in mental darkness. It was
at least necessary for her to have some training in the
exercise of irresponsible power, to make her equal to the
task of treating me as though I were a brute.</p>
        <pb id="douglass37" n="37"/>
        <p>My mistress was, as I have said, a kind and
tender-hearted woman; and in the simplicity of her soul
she commenced, when I first went to live with her, to
treat me as she supposed one human being ought to treat
another. In entering upon the duties of a slaveholder, she did not seem
to perceive that I sustained to her the relation of a mere
chattel, and that for her to treat me as a human being was
not only wrong, but dangerously
so. Slavery proved as injurious to her as it did to me.
When I went there, she was a pious, warm, and tender-hearted
woman. There was no sorrow or suffering for
which she had not a tear. She had bread for the hungry,
clothes for the naked, and comfort for
every mourner that came within her reach. Slavery soon
proved its ability to divest her of these heavenly
qualities. Under its influence, the tender heart became
stone, and the lamblike disposition gave way to one of
tiger-like fierceness. The first step in her downward
course was in her ceasing to instruct me. She now
commenced to practise her husband's precepts. She
finally became even more violent in her opposition than
her husband himself. She was not satisfied with
simply doing as well as he had commanded; she seemed
anxious to do better. Nothing seemed to make her more
angry than to see me with a newspaper. She seemed to
think that here lay the danger.
I have had her rush at me with a face made all up of fury,
and snatch from me a newspaper, in a manner that fully
revealed her apprehension. She was an apt
woman; and a little experience soon demonstrated, to her
satisfaction, that education and slavery were incompatible
with each other.</p>
        <pb id="douglass38" n="38"/>
        <p>From this time I was most narrowly watched. If I was
in a separate room any considerable length of time, I was
sure to be suspected of having a book, and was at once
called to give an account of myself. All this, however, was
too late. The first step had been taken. Mistress, in
teaching me the alphabet, had given me the <hi rend="italics">inch</hi>, and no
precaution could prevent me from taking the <hi rend="italics">ell</hi>.</p>
        <p>The plan which I adopted, and the one by which I was
most successful, was that of making friends of all the little
white boys whom I met in the street. As many of these
as I could, I converted into teachers. With their kindly aid,
obtained at different times and in different places, I finally
succeeded in learning to read. When I was sent of errands,
I always took my book with me, and by going one part of
my errand quickly, I found time to get a lesson before my
return. I used also to carry bread with me, enough of
which was always in the house, and to which I was
always welcome; for I was much better off in this regard
than many of the poor white children in our neighborhood.
This bread I used to bestow upon the hungry little
urchins, who, in return, would give me that more valuable
bread of knowledge. I am strongly tempted to give the
names of two or three of those little boys, as a testimonial
of the gratitude and affection I bear them; but prudence
forbids;—not that it would injure me, but it might
embarrass them; for it is almost an unpardonable offence
to teach slaves to read in this Christian country. It is
enough to say of the dear little fellows, that they lived on
Philpot Street, very near Durgin and Bailey's ship-yard. I
used to talk this matter of slavery
<pb id="douglass39" n="39"/>
over with them. I would sometimes say to them, I wished
I could be as free as they would be when they got to be
men. “You will be free as soon as you are twenty-one,
<hi rend="italics">but I am a slave for life</hi>! Have not I as good a right to be
free as you have?” These words used to trouble them;
they would express for me the liveliest sympathy, and
console me with the hope that something would occur
by which I might be free.</p>
        <p>I was now about twelve years old, and the thought of
being <hi rend="italics">a slave for life</hi> began to bear heavily upon my heart.
Just about this time, I got hold of a book entitled “The
Columbian Orator.” Every opportunity
I got, I used to read this book. Among much of other
interesting matter, I found in it a dialogue between a
master and his slave. The slave was represented as having
run away from his master three times. The dialogue
represented the conversation which took place between
them, when the slave was retaken the third time. In this
dialogue, the whole argument in behalf of slavery was
brought forward by the master, all of which was disposed
of by the slave. The slave was made to say some very
smart as well as impressive things
in reply to his master—things which had the desired
though unexpected effect; for the conversation resulted in
the voluntary emancipation of the slave on the part of the
master.</p>
        <p>In the same book, I met with one of Sheridan's
mighty speeches on and in behalf of Catholic
emancipation. These were choice documents to me. I read
them over and over again with unabated interest.
They gave tongue to interesting thoughts of my own soul,
which had frequently flashed through my mind,
<pb id="douglass40" n="40"/>
and died away for want of utterance. The moral
which I gained from the dialogue was the power of
truth over the conscience of even a slaveholder. What
I got from Sheridan was a bold denunciation of
slavery, and a powerful vindication of human rights.
The reading of these documents enabled me to utter
my thoughts, and to meet the arguments brought forward
to sustain slavery; but while they relieved me
of one difficulty, they brought on another even more
painful than the one of which I was relieved. The more
I read, the more I was led to abhor and detest my enslavers.
I could regard them in no other light than a
band of successful robbers, who had left their homes,
and gone to Africa, and stolen us from our homes, and
in a strange land reduced us to slavery. I loathed
them as being the meanest as well as the most wicked
of men. As I read and contemplated the subject, behold!
that very discontentment which Master Hugh had
predicted would follow my learning to read had already
come, to torment and sting my soul to unutterable
anguish. As I writhed under it, I would at times feel
that learning to read had been a curse rather than a
blessing. It had given me a view of my wretched
condition, without the remedy. It opened my eyes to
the horrible pit, but to no ladder upon which to get out.
In moments of agony, I envied my fellow-slaves for
their stupidity. I have often wished myself a beast.
I preferred the condition of the meanest reptile to my
own. Any thing, no matter what, to get rid of thinking! It
was this everlasting thinking of my condition that
tormented me. There was no getting rid of it. It was
pressed upon me by every object within sight or
<pb id="douglass41" n="41"/>
hearing, animate or inanimate. The silver trump of
freedom had roused my soul to eternal wakefulness.
Freedom now appeared, to disappear no more forever. It was heard in
every sound, and seen in every thing. It was ever present
to torment me with a sense of my wretched condition. I
saw nothing without seeing it, I heard nothing without
hearing it, and felt nothing without feeling it. It looked
from every star, it smiled in every calm, breathed in every
wind, and moved in every storm.</p>
        <p>I often found myself regretting my own existence, and
wishing myself dead; and but for the hope of being free, I
have no doubt but that I should have killed myself, or
done something for which I should have been killed. While
in this state of mind, I was eager to hear any one speak of
slavery. I was a ready listener. Every little while, I could
hear something about the abolitionists. It was some time
before I found what the word meant. It was always used
in such connections as to make it an interesting word to
me. If a slave ran away and succeeded in getting clear, or if
a slave killed his master, set fire to a barn, or did any thing
very wrong in the mind of a slaveholder, it was spoken of
as the fruit of <hi rend="italics">abolition</hi>. Hearing the word in this
connection very often, I set about learning what it meant.
The dictionary afforded me little or no help. I found it was
“the act of abolishing;” but then I did not know what was
to be abolished. Here I was perplexed. I did not dare to
ask any one about its meaning, for I was satisfied that it
was something they wanted me to know very little about.
After a patient waiting, I got one of our city papers,
containing
<pb id="douglass42" n="42"/>
an account of the number of petitions from the north,
praying for the abolition of slavery in the District of
Columbia, and of the slave trade between the States. From
this time I understood the words <hi rend="italics">abolition</hi> and <hi rend="italics">abolitionist</hi>,
and always drew near when that word was spoken,
expecting to bear something of importance to myself and
fellow-slaves. The light broke in upon me by degrees. I
went one day down on the wharf of Mr. Waters; and seeing
two Irishmen unloading a scow of stone, I went, unasked,
and helped them. When we had finished, one of them came
to me and asked me if I were a slave. I told him I was. He
asked, “Are ye a slave for life?” I told him that I was. The
good Irishman seemed to be deeply affected by the
statement. He said to the other that it was a pity so fine a
little fellow as myself should be a slave for life. He said it
was a shame to hold me. They both advised me to run
away to the north; that I should find friends there, and that
I should be free. I pretended not to be interested in what
they said, and treated them as if I did not understand them;
for I feared they might be treacherous. White men have
been known to encourage slaves to escape, and then, to get
the reward, catch them and return them to their masters. I
was afraid that these seemingly good men might use me so;
but I nevertheless remembered their advice, and from that
time I resolved to run away. I looked forward to a time at
which it would be safe for me to escape. I was too young
to think of doing so immediately; besides, I wished to
learn how to write, as I might have occasion to write my
own pass. I consoled myself with the hope that I should
<pb id="douglass43" n="43"/>
one day find a good chance. Meanwhile, I would learn to
write.</p>
        <p>The idea as to how I might learn to write was suggested
to me by being in Durgin and Bailey's ship-yard, and
frequently seeing the ship carpenters, after hewing, and
getting a piece of timber ready for use, write on the timber
the name of that part of the ship for which it was
intended. When a piece of timber was intended for the
larboard side, it would be marked thus—“L.” When a piece
was for the starboard side, it would be marked thus—
“S.” A piece for the larboard side forward, would be
marked thus—“L. F.” When a piece was for starboard side
forward, it would be marked thus—“S. F.” For larboard
aft, it would be marked thus—“L. A.” For starboard aft, it
would be marked thus—“S. A.” I soon learned the names of
these letters, and for what they were intended when
placed upon a piece of timber in the ship-yard. I
immediately commenced copying them, and in a short
time was able to make the four letters named. After that,
when I met with any boy who I knew could write, I would
tell him I could write as well as he. The next word would
be, “I don't believe you. Let me see you try it.” I would
then make the letters which I had been so fortunate as to
learn, and ask him to beat that. In this way I got a good
many lessons in writing, which it is quite possible I should
never have gotten in any other way. During this time, my
copy-book was the board fence, brick wall, and pavement;
my pen and ink was a lump of chalk. With these, I
learned mainly how to write. I then commenced and
continued copying the Italics in
<pb id="douglass44" n="44"/>
Webster's Spelling Book, until I could make them all
without looking on the book. By this time, my little
Master Thomas had gone to school, and learned how to
write, and had written over a number of copy-books.
These had been brought home, and shown to some of our
near neighbors, and then laid aside. My mistress used to
go to class meeting at the Wilk Street meeting house every
Monday afternoon, and leave me to take care of the house.
When left thus, I used to spend the time in writing in the
spaces left in Master Thomas's copy-book, copying what
he had written. I continued to do this until I could write a hand very similar
to that of Master Thomas. Thus, after a long, tedious
effort for years, I finally succeeded in learning how to
write.</p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="chapter">
        <head>CHAPTER VIII.</head>
        <p>IN a very short time after I went to live at Baltimore,
my old master's youngest son Richard died; and in about
three years and six months after his death, my old master,
Captain Anthony, died, leaving only his son, Andrew, and
daughter, Lucretia, to share his estate. He died while on a
visit to see his daughter at Hillsborough. Cut off thus
unexpectedly, he left no will as to the disposal of his
property. It was therefore necessary to have a valuation
of the property, that it might be equally divided between
Mrs. Lucretia and Master Andrew. I was immediately
sent for, to
<pb id="douglass45" n="45"/>
be valued with the other property. Here again my feelings
rose up in detestation of slavery. I had now a new
conception of my degraded condition. Prior to this, I had
become, if not insensible to my lot, at least partly so. I
left Baltimore with a young heart overborne with sadness,
and a soul full of apprehension. I took passage with
Captain Rowe, in the schooner Wild Cat, and, after a sail
of about twenty-four hours, I found myself near the place
of my birth. I had now been absent from it almost, if not
quite, five years. I, however, remembered the place very
well. I was only about five years old when I left it, to go
and live with my old master on Colonel Lloyd's plantation;
so that I was now between ten and eleven years old.</p>
        <p>We were all ranked together at the valuation. Men and
women, old and young, married and single, were ranked with
horses, sheep, and swine. There were horses and men,
cattle and women, pigs and children, all holding the same
rank in the scale of being, and were all subjected to the
same narrow examination. Silvery-headed age and
sprightly youth, maids and matrons, had to undergo the
same indelicate inspection. At this moment, I saw more
clearly than ever the brutalizing effects of slavery upon
both slave and slaveholder.</p>
        <p>After the valuation, then came the division. I have no
language to express the high excitement and deep anxiety
which were felt among us poor slaves during this time.
Our fate for life was now to be decided. We had no more
voice in that decision than the brutes among whom we
were ranked. A single word from
<pb id="douglass46" n="46"/>
the white men was enough—against all our wishes,
prayers, and entreaties—to sunder forever the dearest
friends, dearest kindred, and strongest ties known to
human beings. In addition to the pain of separation, there
was the horrid dread of falling into the hands of Master
Andrew. He was known to us all as being a most cruel
wretch,—a common drunkard, who had, by his reckless
mismanagement and profligate dissipation already wasted
a large portion of his father's property. We all felt that we
might as well be sold at once to the Georgia traders, as to
pass into his hands; for we knew that that would be our
inevitable condition,—a condition held by us all in the
utmost horror and dread.</p>
        <p>I suffered more anxiety than most of my fellow-slaves. I
had known what it was to be kindly treated; they had
known nothing of the kind. They had seen little or nothing
of the world. They were in very deed men and women of
sorrow, and acquainted with grief. Their backs had been
made familiar with the bloody lash, so that they had
become callous; mine was yet tender; for while at
Baltimore I got few whippings, and few slaves could boast
of a kinder master and mistress than myself; and the
thought of passing out of their hands into those of Master
Andrew—a man who, but a few days before, to give me a
sample of his bloody disposition, took my little brother by
the throat, threw him on the ground, and with the heel of
his boot stamped upon his head till the blood gushed from
his nose and ears—was well calculated to make me anxious
as to my fate. After he had committed this savage outrage
upon my brother, he turned to me, and
<pb id="douglass47" n="47"/>
said that was the way he meant to serve me one of these
days,—meaning, I suppose, when I came into his
possession.</p>
        <p>Thanks to a kind Providence, I fell to the portion of
Mrs. Lucretia, and was sent immediately back to
Baltimore, to live again in the family of Master Hugh.
Their joy at my return equalled their sorrow at my
departure. It was a glad day to me. I had escaped a worse
than lion's jaws. I was absent from Baltimore, for the
purpose of valuation and division, just about one month,
and it seemed to have been six.</p>
        <p>Very soon after my return to Baltimore, my mistress,
Lucretia, died, leaving her husband and one child, Amanda;
and in a very short time after her death, Master Andrew
died. Now all the property of my old master, slaves
included, was in the hands of strangers,
—strangers who had had nothing to do with accumulating
it. Not a slave was left free. All remained slaves, from the
youngest to the oldest. If any one thing in my experience,
more than another, served to deepen my conviction of the
infernal character of slavery, and to fill me with
unutterable loathing of slaveholders, it was their base ingratitude
to my poor old grandmother. She had served my old master faithfully
from youth to old age. She had been the source
of all his wealth; she had peopled his plantation with
slaves; she had become a great grandmother in his
service. She had rocked him in infancy, attended him in
childhood, served him through life, and at his death wiped
from his icy brow the cold death-sweat, and closed
his eyes forever. She was nevertheless left a slave—a slave
for life—a slave in the hands of strangers;
<pb id="douglass48" n="48"/>
and in their hands she saw her children, her grandchildren,
and her great-grand children, divided, like so many sheep,
without being gratified with the small privilege of a single
word, as to their or her own destiny. And, to cap the
climax of their base ingratitude and fiendish barbarity, my
grandmother, who was now very old, having outlived my
old master and all his children, having seen the beginning
and end of all of them, and her present owners finding she
was of but little value, her frame already racked with the
pains of old age, and complete helplessness fast stealing
over her once active limbs, they took her to the woods,
built her a little hut, put up a little mud-chimney, and then
made her welcome to the privilege of supporting herself
there in perfect loneliness; thus virtually turning her out to
die! If my poor old grandmother now lives, she lives to
suffer in utter loneliness; she lives to remember and mourn
over the loss of children, the loss of grandchildren, and the
loss of great-grandchildren. They are, in the language of the
slave's poet, Whittier,—</p>
        <lg type="verse">
          <l>“Gone, gone, sold and gone</l>
          <l>To the rice swamp dank and lone,</l>
          <l>Where the slave-whip ceaseless swings,</l>
          <l>Where the noisome insect stings,</l>
          <l>Where the fever-demon strews</l>
          <l>Poison with the failing dews,</l>
          <l>Where the sickly sunbeams glare</l>
          <l>Through the hot and misty air:—</l>
          <l>Gone, gone, sold and gone</l>
          <l>To the rice swamp dank and lone,</l>
          <l>From Virginia hills and waters—</l>
          <l>Woe is me, my stolen daughters!”</l>
        </lg>
        <pb id="douglass49" n="49"/>
        <p>The hearth is desolate. The children, the unconscious
children, who once sang and danced in her
presence, are gone. She gropes her way, in the darkness of
age, for a drink of water. Instead of the voices of her
children, she hears by day the moans of the dove, and by
night the screams of the hideous owl. All is gloom. The
grave is at the door. And now, when weighed down by the
pains and aches of old age, when the head inclines to the
feet, when the beginning and ending of human existence
meet, and helpless infancy and painful old age combine
together—at this time, this most needful time, the time
for the exercise of that tenderness and affection which
children only can exercise towards a declining parent—
my poor old grandmother, the devoted mother of twelve
children, is left all alone, in yonder little hut, before a few
dim embers. She stands—she sits—she staggers—
she falls—she groans—she dies—and there are none of her
children or grandchildren present, to wipe from her
wrinkled brow the cold sweat of death, or to place beneath
the sod her fallen remains. Will not a righteous God visit
for these things?</p>
        <p>In about two years after the death of Mrs. Lucretia,
Master Thomas married his second wife. Her name was
Rowena Hamilton. She was the eldest daughter of Mr.
William Hamilton. Master now lived in St. Michael's. Not
long after his marriage, a misunderstanding took place
between himself and Master Hugh;
and as a means of punishing his brother, he took me from
him to live with himself at St. Michael's. Here I
underwent another most painful separation. It, however,
was not so severe as the one I dreaded at the 
<pb id="douglass50" n="50"/>
division of property; for, during this interval, a great
change had taken place in Master Hugh and his once
kind and affectionate wife. The influence of brandy upon
him, and of slavery upon her, had effected a disastrous
change in the characters of both; so that, as far as they
were concerned, I thought I had little to lose by the
change. But it was not to them that I was attached. It was
to those little Baltimore boys that I felt the strongest
attachment. I had received many good lessons from them,
and was still receiving them, and the thought of leaving
them was painful indeed. I was leaving, too, without the
hope of ever being allowed to return. Master Thomas had
said he would never let me return again. The barrier
betwixt himself and brother he considered impassable.</p>
        <p>I then had to regret that I did not at least make the
attempt to carry out my resolution to run away; for the
chances of success are tenfold greater from the city than
from the country.</p>
        <p>I sailed from Baltimore for St. Michael's in the sloop
Amanda, Captain Edward Dodson. On my passage, I paid
particular attention to the direction which the steamboats
took to go to Philadelphia. I found, instead of going down,
on reaching North Point they went up the bay, in a
north-easterly direction. I deemed this knowledge of the utmost
importance. My determination to run away was again
revived. I resolved to wait only so long as the offering of a
favorable opportunity. When that came, I was determined
to be off.</p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="chapter">
        <pb id="douglass51" n="51"/>
        <head>CHAPTER IX.</head>
        <p>I HAVE now reached a period of my life when I can
give dates. I left Baltimore, and went to
live with Master Thomas Auld, at St. Michael's, in March,
1832. It was now more than seven years since I lived with
him in the family of my old master, on Colonel Lloyd's
plantation. We of course were now almost entire strangers
to each other. He was to me a new master, and I to him a
new slave. I was ignorant of his temper and disposition; he
was equally so of mine. A very short time, however,
brought us into full acquaintance with each other. I was
made acquainted with his wife not less than with himself.
They were well matched, being equally mean and cruel. I
was now, for the first time during a space of more than
seven years, made to feel the painful gnawings of hunger—
a something which I had not experienced before since I left
Colonel Lloyd's plantation. It went hard enough with me
then, when I could look back to no period at which I had
enjoyed a sufficiency. It was tenfold harder after living in
Master Hugh's family, where I had always had enough to
eat, and of that which was good. I have said Master
Thomas was a mean man. He was so. Not to give a slave
enough to eat, is regarded as the most aggravated
development of meanness even among slaveholders. The
rule is, no matter how coarse the food, only let there be
enough of it. This is the theory; and in the part of
Maryland from which I came, it is the general practice,—though
<pb id="douglass52" n="52"/>
there are many exceptions. Master Thomas gave us
enough of neither coarse nor fine food. There were four
slaves of us in the kitchen—my sister Eliza, my aunt
Priscilla, Henny, and myself; and we were allowed less
than a half of a bushel of corn-meal per week, and very
little else, either in the shape of meat or vegetables. It was
not enough for us to subsist upon. We were therefore
reduced to the wretched necessity of living at the expense
of our neighbors. This we did by begging and stealing,
whichever came handy in the time of need, the one being
considered as legitimate as the other. A great many times
have we poor creatures been nearly perishing with hunger,
when food in abundance lay mouldering in the safe and
smoke-house, and our pious mistress was aware of the fact;
and yet that mistress and her husband would kneel every
morning, and pray that God would bless them in basket
and store!</p>
        <p>Bad as all slaveholders are, we seldom meet one
destitute of every element of character commanding
respect. My master was one of this rare sort. I do not
know of one single noble act ever performed by him. The
leading trait in his character was meanness; and if there
were any other element in his nature, it was made subject
to this. He was mean; and, like most other mean men, he
lacked the ability to conceal his meanness. Captain Auld
was not born a slaveholder. He had been a poor man,
master only of a Bay craft. He came into possession of all
his slaves by marriage; and of all men, adopted
slaveholders are the worst. He was cruel, but cowardly. He
commanded without firmness. In the enforcement of
<pb id="douglass53" n="53"/>
his rules, he was at times rigid, and at times lax. At times,
he spoke to his slaves with the firmness of Napoleon and
the fury of a demon; at other times, he might well be
mistaken for an inquirer who had lost his way. He did
nothing of himself. He might have passed for a lion, but
for his ears. In all things noble which he attempted, his
own meanness shone most conspicuous. His airs, words,
and actions, were the airs, words, and actions of born
slaveholders, and, being assumed, were awkward enough.
He was not even a good imitator. He possessed all the
disposition to deceive, but wanted the power. Having no
resources within himself, he was compelled to be the
copyist of many, and being such, he was forever the
victim of inconsistency; and of consequence he was an
object of contempt, and was held as such even by his
slaves. The luxury of having slaves of his own to wait
upon him was something new and unprepared for. He was
a slaveholder without the ability to hold slaves. He found
himself incapable of managing his slaves either by force,
fear, or fraud. We seldom called him “master;” we
generally called him “Captain Auld,” and were hardly
disposed to title him at all. I doubt not that our conduct
had much to do with making him appear awkward, and of
consequence fretful. Our want of reverence for him must
have perplexed him greatly. He wished to have us call him
master, but lacked the firmness necessary to command us
to do so. His wife used to insist upon our calling him so,
but to no purpose. In August, 1832, my master attended a
Methodist camp-meeting held in the Bay-side, Talbot
county, and there experienced religion. I indulged a
<pb id="douglass54" n="54"/>
faint hope that his conversion would lead him to emancipate
his slaves, and that, if he did not do this, it would, at
any rate, make him more kind and humane. I was
disappointed in both these respects. It neither made him to
be humane to his slaves, nor to emancipate them. If it had
any effect on his character, it made him more cruel and
hateful in all his ways; for I believe him to have been a
much worse man after his conversion than before. Prior to
his conversion, he relied upon his own depravity to shield
and sustain him in his savage barbarity; but after his
conversion, he found religious sanction and support for his
slaveholding cruelty. He made the greatest pretensions to
piety. His house was the house of prayer. He prayed
morning, noon, and night. He very soon distinguished
himself among his brethren, and was soon made
a class-leader and exhorter. His activity in revivals was great, and
he proved himself an instrument in the hands of the church
in converting many souls. His house was the preachers'
home. They used to take great pleasure in coming there to
put up; for while he starved us, he stuffed them. We have
had three or four preachers there at a time. The names of
those who used to come most frequently while I lived
there, were Mr. Storks, Mr. Ewery, Mr. Humphry, and
Mr. Hickey. I have also seen Mr. George Cookman at our
house. We slaves loved Mr. Cookman. We believed him to
be a good man. We thought him instrumental in getting Mr.
Samuel Harrison, a very rich slaveholder, to emancipate his
slaves; and by some means got the impression that he was
laboring to effect the emancipation of all the slaves. When
he was at our house, we
<pb id="douglass55" n="55"/>
were sure to be called in to prayers. When the others
were there, we were sometimes called in and sometimes not.
Mr. Cookman took more notice of us than
either of the other ministers. He could not come among us
without betraying his sympathy for us, and, stupid as we
were, we had the sagacity to see it.</p>
        <p>While I lived with my master in St. Michael's, there
was a white young man, a Mr. Wilson, who proposed to
keep a Sabbath school for the instruction of such slaves as
might be disposed to learn to read the New Testament.
We met but three times, when Mr. West and Mr.
Fairbanks, both class-leaders, with many others, came
upon us with sticks and other missiles, drove us off, and
forbade us to meet again. Thus ended our little Sabbath
school in the pious town of St. Michael's.</p>
        <p>I have said my master found religious sanction for his
cruelty. As an example, I will state one of many facts
going to prove the charge. I have seen him tie up a lame
young woman, and whip her with a heavy cowskin upon
her naked shoulders, causing the warm red blood to drip;
and, in justification of the bloody deed, he would quote
this passage of Scripture—“He that knoweth his master's
will, and doeth it not, shall be beaten with many stripes.”</p>
        <p>Master would keep this lacerated young, woman tied
up in this horrid situation four or five hours at a time.
I have known him to tie her up early in the morning,
and whip her before breakfast; leave her, go
to his store, return at dinner, and whip her again,
cutting her in the places already made raw with his
cruel lash. The secret of master's cruelty toward
<pb id="douglass56" n="56"/>
“Henny” is found in the fact of her being almost helpless.
When quite a child, she fell into the fire, and burned
herself horribly. Her hands were so burnt, that she never
got the use of them. She could do very little but bear heavy
burdens. She was to master a bill of expense;
and as he was a mean man, she was a constant offence to
him. He seemed desirous of getting the poor girl out of
existence. He gave her away once to his sister; but, being a
poor gift, she was not disposed to keep her. Finally,
my benevolent master, to use his own words, “set her
adrift to take care of herself.” Here was a
recently-converted man, holding on upon the mother,
and at the same time turning out her helpless
child, to starve and die! Master Thomas was one of
the many pious slaveholders who hold slaves for
the very charitable purpose of taking care of them.</p>
        <p>My master and myself had quite a number of
differences. He found me unsuitable to his purpose. My
city life, he said, had had a very pernicious effect upon
me. It had almost ruined me for every good purpose, and
fitted me for every thing which was bad. One of
my greatest faults was that of letting his horse run
away, and go down to his father-in-law's farm, which
was about five miles from St. Michael's. I would then
have to go after it. My reason for this kind of carelessness,
or carefulness, was, that I could always get
something to eat when I went there. Master William
Hamilton, my master's father-in-law, always gave his
slaves enough to eat. I never left there hungry, no
matter how great the need of my speedy return.
Master Thomas at length said he would stand it no
<pb id="douglass57" n="57"/>
longer. I had lived with him nine months, during which time
he had given me a number of severe whippings, all to no
good purpose. He resolved to put me out, as he said, to be
broken; and, for this purpose, he let me for one year to a
man named Edward Covey. Mr. Covey was a poor man, a
farm-renter. He rented the place upon which he lived, as also
the hands with which he tilled it. Mr. Covey had acquired a
very high reputation for breaking young slaves, and this
reputation was of immense value to him. It enabled him to
get his farm tilled with much less expense to himself than
he could have had it done without such a reputation. Some
slaveholders thought it not much loss to allow Mr. Covey
to have their slaves one year, for the sake of the training
to which they were subjected, without any other
compensation. He could hire young help with great ease, in
consequence of this reputation. Added to the natural good
qualities of Mr. Covey, he was a professor of religion—a
pious soul—a member and a class-leader in the Methodist
church. All of this added weight to his reputation as a “nigger-breaker.”
I was aware of all the facts, having been
made acquainted with them by a young man who had lived
there. I nevertheless made the change gladly; for I was sure
of getting enough to eat, which is not the smallest
consideration to a hungry man.</p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="chapter">
        <pb id="douglass58" n="58"/>
        <head>CHAPTER X.</head>
        <p>I LEFT Master Thomas's house, and went to live with Mr.
Covey, on the 1st of January, 1833. I was now, for the first
time in my life, a field hand. In my new employment, I
found myself even more awkward than a country boy
appeared to be in a large city. I had been at my new home
but one week before Mr. Covey gave me a very severe
whipping, cutting my back, causing the blood to run, and
raising ridges on my flesh as large as my little finger. The
details of this affair are as follows: Mr. Covey sent me,
very early in the morning of one of our coldest days in the
month of January, to the woods, to get a load of wood. He
gave me a team of unbroken oxen. He told me which was the
in-hand ox, and which the off-hand one. He then tied the
end of a large rope around the horns of the in-hand ox, and
gave me the other end of it, and told me, if the oxen started
to run, that I must hold on upon the rope. I had never
driven oxen before, and of course I was very awkward. I,
however, succeeded in getting to the edge of the woods
with little difficulty; but I had got a very few rods into the
woods, when the oxen took fright, and started full tilt,
carrying the cart against trees, and over stumps, in the most
frightful manner. I expected every moment that my brains
would be dashed out against the trees. After running thus
for a considerable distance, they finally upset the cart,
dashing it with great force against a tree, and threw
themselves
<pb id="douglass59" n="59"/>
into it dense thicket. How I escaped death, I do not know.
There I was, entirely alone, in a thick wood, in a place new
to me. My cart was upset and shattered, my oxen were
entangled among the young trees, and there was none to
help me. After a long spell of effort, I succeeded in getting
my cart righted, my oxen disentangled, and again yoked to
the cart. I now proceeded with my team to the place where
I had, the day before, been chopping wood, and loaded my
cart pretty heavily, thinking in this way to tame my oxen. I
then proceeded on my way home. I had now consumed one
half of the day. I got out of the woods safely, and now felt
out of danger, I stopped my oxen to open the woods gate;
and just as I did so, before I could get hold of my ox-rope,
the oxen again started, rushed through the gate, catching it
between the wheel and the body of the cart, tearing it to
pieces, and coming within a few inches of crushing me
against the gate-post. Thus twice, in one short day, I
escaped death by the merest chance. On my return, I told
Mr. Covey what had happened, and how it happened. He
ordered me to return to the woods again immediately. I did
so, and he followed on after me. Just as I got into the
woods, he came up and told me to stop my cart, and that
he would teach me how to trifle away my time, and break
gates. He then went to a large gum-tree, and with his axe cut
three large switches, and, after trimming them up neatly
with his pocket-knife, he ordered me to take off my clothes.
I made him no answer, but stood with my clothes on. He
repeated his order. I still made him no answer, nor did I
move to strip myself. Upon this he rushed
<pb id="douglass60" n="60"/>
at me with the fierceness of a tiger, tore off my clothes,
and lashed me till he had worn out his switches, cutting
me so savagely as to leave the marks visible for a long
time after. This whipping was the first of a number just like it,
and for similar offences.</p>
        <p>I lived with Mr. Covey one year. During the first six
months, of that year, scarce a week passed without his
whipping me. I was seldom free from a sore back. My
awkwardness was almost always his excuse for whipping
me. We were worked fully up to the point of endurance.
Long before day we were up, our horses fed, and by the
first approach of day we were off to the fi