New generation of Alabama judges more willing to rule progressively
A new generation of young judges take the bench believing that they have an obligation to the state of Alabama, Heflin believes. He seems to be saying that judges are more willing to rule proactively on civil rights, and certainly believes that courts are beginning to protect human rights, rather than property rights. These new judges are eroding the differences between the judiciary in the South and elsewhere.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Howell Heflin, July 9, 1974. Interview A-0010. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- JACK BASS:
-
You do see then a trend toward a more activist state court
system?
- HOWELL HEFLIN:
-
I do.
- JACK BASS:
-
Nationally?
- HOWELL HEFLIN:
-
Nationally. In every state. It's beginning to crop up.
- JACK BASS:
-
Is this sort of an after effect of the Warren court?
- HOWELL HEFLIN:
-
It's a pendulum. I think as basically the state court systems reacted
against Warren court. . . . I came on this court. . . . I mean I came up
as a lawyer trying to find out what the law was. You followed decisions
of the Supreme Court. I came into a conference here and the first
" any damn way we
can get around the Supreme Court on this decision let's do it. I ain't
following the Supreme Court of the United States on anything."
That type of attitude. Now it's changing. You're getting a younger group
that's coming in. And I think it's part of the pendulum. It was a
reaction against the Warren court. And this is true in Montana, true in
Kansas, true in Michigan and New Jersey and all state. But now, I think,
that group is goingand you're getting a
younger-maybe younger is in the fifties-coming on
with an idea that their obligations and responsibilities that they owe
to the state and owe to the people and they ought to endeavor to try to
do something about it. I've been here three and a half years, but in
January, with the new court coming in, there will only have been two
people who have been here longer. In other words there will be six
members of the court which will-five members of the court
which will have been added since I've come on. And I think in another
five or six years this will take place in the other states.
- JACK BASS:
-
I recall reading in a biography of Warren that he said he viewed the
Supreme Court of the United States as being more of a court of
justice than a court of law. Is this philosophy
permeating down to. . . coming into the state court
system?
- HOWELL HEFLIN:
-
Not as much so, of course, as the Warren did. It's moving but I think
some of it, to some moderate degree, is coming down. You've got such
things as. . . we'll say in consumer fields.
this issue has been in state courts. Largely you have the old common law
concepts of jurisprudence. You follow the various things. And I think
more people are more people minded, that people have more rights,
injured people have more rights than the concepts of what you
.[unclear] I can tell already the trend in this court to effect. . . .
Well, they're more human rights versus property rights. I think the
human rights philosophy is creeping in in moderate degrees now in state
courts where it was a firm, hardfast feeling before that we protect
property rights over human rights. I think now there is a feeling that
human rights should be looked upon more so than property rights.
- JACK BASS:
-
Do you perceive. . . . You know, when you go to judicial conferences and
so forth, do you perceive any difference in attitudes among state judges
from the South as opposed to those from the non-South on these
issues?
- HOWELL HEFLIN:
-
I think it's more largely new people coming in. The older judges from the
South possess the same judicial restraint-states rights approach. . . .
The one in Kansas that had that approach, the older one, and Oregon,
Washington, Indiana. . . . I'd say the most conservative chief justice
on states rights and federal and state relationships today is the chief
justice in Indiana. More so than the old chief justice Bobbitt or Suzy
Sharp or Joe Mulston in South Carolina-who have been there
for years-and that type of people. I think they are the same
all over. I think the change is taking place all over regardless whether
it be South, North, East or West.
- WALTER DE VRIES:
-
Do you detect any regional differences between southern court systems and
court systems outside the South?
- HOWELL HEFLIN:
-
Well, basically there have been in the racial matters. I think there's
more. . . well, the older groups. . . . I think as the younger group
comes along that that is lesser.
- WALTER DE VRIES:
-
Any other differences?
- HOWELL HEFLIN:
-
Well, in the other state systems, you find pretty well the same
stereotypes that you find in the South. You find in other places. . .
perhaps may be the South maybe is a little more. . . . But there are a
lot of. . . . I look around in Georgia, look around in Florida,
Kentucky, Tennessee, and I see opinions coming out that are not really
different from what's coming out of Oregon, coming out of New Jersey,
coming out of Maine, coming out of Colorado. I think the philosophy is
not altogether uniform, but there's a striking uniformity between
them.