Evolution of the Republican Party in the South at the state and national level
Reed discusses the evolution of the Republican Party in the South, focusing specifically on his home state of Mississippi. Reed focuses specifically here on contrasting national and state politics, suggesting that Mississippians became Republicans in terms of their choices for national politics more than they did in terms of state politics. Additionally, Reed addresses such issues as the role of personality versus philosophy, and he discusses perceptions of candidates such as Richard Nixon, George Wallace, and Herbert Humphrey. By the time of the interview, in the mid-1970s, Reed argued that being a Republican had become more acceptable in the South as that party became increasingly dominant.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Clarke Reed, April 2, 1974. Interview A-0113. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- WALTER DEVRIES:
-
Do the people in this state see national politics completely different
than state politics?
- CLARKE REED:
-
Yeah. That's the problem. That's the goal?.
- WALTER DEVRIES:
-
Well, does it also mean they don't see the parties as two
distinctive units but rather as a personality thing.
- CLARKE REED:
-
Well, it's always been… politics has always been
personality. One party system. You have personality
[unclear] . I mean they can serve up the Bilbos, the
Barnetts. They come in… a governor comes in, an unknown, and
you leave highly unpopular. Anyway, that's what
we're going against, you might say. So we're to
the point… I don't take a poll of party
identification… In the beginning it would probably have been
90% Democrat and 8% independent and 2 or 3 Republican.
- WALTER DEVRIES:
-
— Republican party in Mississippi see itself as basically kind
of a philosophical thing. Ideological rather than—
- CLARKE REED:
-
Right, right.
- WALTER DEVRIES:
-
—haven't been able to do anything with it.
- CLARKE REED:
-
Right. Once you've done that, you're here.
You're the dominant party. I accept this philosophically.
Changes in a republic or especially changes under your old system will
come slow. If they don't come slow, they'll be
volatile, like a banana republic. I accept this difficult problem with
party identification, especially also in an era
where parties and politcs per se was down. Every Mississippian thinks
he's independent, votes for the man, doesn't care
much what party he's in. But there's an increasing
number of people that will identify with the Republican party. The polls
show it. It looms higher in presidential elections or maybe in a strong
election where we've got something going or in certain
pockets of the state. This county, Jones County, the coast, and areas
where…. That is the goal and the opposition is the
personality politics. We're trying to sell the two party
system concept. The idea of philosophically different parties to
people.
- WALTER DEVRIES:
-
Has it been tough to sell?
- CLARKE REED:
-
Well, no tougher than I anticipated. Although sometimes I get more
optimistic—say after the Goldwater race. But I mean in
hindsight that was foolish optimism. And going to the race thing, that
was the overwhelming, overshadowing issue of all. It's hard
to perpetuate reasons through that climate. Now that's no
longer there and I think some reason… our salesmanship should
be more effective.
- WALTER DEVRIES:
-
But do you see the state continuing to vote Republican at the
presidential level and Democratic at the state level?
- CLARKE REED:
-
Definitely Republican at the presidential level. And we
hope—more than that, I believe—we'll
make increasing gains in the state.
- JACK BASS:
-
In 1968, of course, the state voted overwhelmingly for George Wallace. I
think Nixon ran even behind Humphrey. Third.
- CLARKE REED:
-
Got the lowest vote in the nation, yeah.
- JACK BASS:
-
Does that suggest Mississippians tend to vote for the more racially
conservative candidate?
- CLARKE REED:
-
Well, at the time of that race the race issue still was red hot, probably
hotter than it had been even before. Nixon was an unknown. He was
the fellow that was vice president way back and had
been a defeated candidate for governor. He was an unknown quantity. Our
polls showed, prior to the '68 election—[something
about running Muskie before McGovern?]—Muskie ran 20 with
Wallace and Nixon up around 30 with Nixon ahead. I believe he would have
carried the state in a three way race last time. I think the Wallace
vote was independent, as a way station into the Republican party, at
least in the national picture.
- JACK BASS:
-
What do you think will happen in '76 if Wallace actively
campaigns for the national Democratic ticket, regardless of who is on
it?
- CLARKE REED:
-
I think [unclear] would carry, without any
work. I think we'll carry easily, let me put it that way.
- JACK BASS:
-
You think the Republicans will carry.
- CLARKE REED:
-
Yes. Any particular nominee I foresee coming out of the party or any
nominee I foresee coming out of the Democratic party.
- WALTER DEVRIES:
-
Do you intend to field more candidates in '75 for the
legislation and state-wide office?
- CLARKE REED:
-
The plan… leadership… is always to field more. You
know, to get them. We haven't been as selective as we might
be. We've had some good ones and we've had some
bad ones. We've had some very good ones be beaten.
We've a long way from the point where being a Republican
is… I just hope we arrive at the point where it's
equal. [I think in some areas its a help on the local level.]
- WALTER DEVRIES:
-
Is that attitude changing, about Republicans. Somebody told us that ten
years ago if you were a Republican—I forget what the term
was—but that was about as low as you could get in terms of
social status and prestige.
- CLARKE REED:
-
Yeah, well, you have to go back a little farther than that. But
that's right. [unclear] There
were so few they were oddities. But that
part's right. But the beginning in the South of the
Republican movement might have been—if it was anything, it
was just the opposite. It was very peculiar being a country club crowd.
It was the young guys. Someone wrote a book I thought covered it pretty
well in one chapter about how it was kind of the thing to do. It was
kind of a kick, you know, to get active in Republican politics. Because
they'd never beeninvolved in politics prior to that. Most of
those people were young idealists or young businessmen. Across deep
South, particularly Mississippi and Alabama.
- WALTER DEVRIES:
-
Is it getting easier to recruit candidates?
- CLARKE REED:
-
Oh yeah.