<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite_sohp_ms.dtd">
<TEI.2>
    <teiHeader type="Southern Oral History Project" status="new">
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title type="main">
                    <hi rend="bold">Oral History Interview with Maury Maverick, October 27, 1975.
                        Interview A-0323. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007):</hi>
                    Electronic Edition. </title>
                <title type="descriptive">Politician and Lawyer Discusses Liberal Politics in Texas</title>
                <author>
                    <name id="mm" reg="Maverick, Maury" type="interviewee">Maverick, Maury</name>,
                    interviewee </author>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Interview conducted by </resp>
                    <name id="dc" reg="Davidson, Chandler" type="interviewer">Davidson,
                    Chandler</name>
                </respStmt>
                <funder>Funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services supported the
                    electronic publication of this interview.</funder>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
                    <name id="jdj">Jennifer Joyner</name>
                </respStmt>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Sound recordings digitized by </resp>
                    <name id="as">Aaron Smithers</name>
                    <name id="sfc">Southern Folklife Collection</name>
                </respStmt>
            </titleStmt>
            <editionStmt>
                <edition>First edition, <date>2007</date>
                </edition>
            </editionStmt>
            <extent>156 Kb</extent>
            <publicationStmt>
                <publisher>The University Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill </publisher>
                <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace>
                <date>2007.</date>
                <availability status="unknown">
                    <p>© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina at Chapel
                        Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching and
                        personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the
                        text.</p>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <biblFull id="recording">
                    <recording type="audio" dur="01:30:35">
                        <p>MP3 file derived from WAV preservation master, which was derived from
                            original analog cassettes.</p>
                    </recording>
                    <titleStmt>
                        <title type="recording">Oral History Interview with Maury Maverick, October
                            27, 1975. Interview A-0323. Southern Oral History Program Collection
                            (#4007)</title>
                        <title type="series">Series A. Southern Politics. Southern Oral History
                            Program Collection (A-0323)</title>
                        <author>Chandler Davidson</author>
                    </titleStmt>
                    <extent>165 Mb</extent>
                    <publicationStmt>
                        <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, N. C.</pubPlace>
                        <publisher>Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina at
                            Chapel Hill</publisher>
                        <date>27 October 1975</date>
                        <authority/>
                    </publicationStmt>
                </biblFull>
                <biblFull id="transcript">
                    <titleStmt>
                        <title type="transcript">Oral History Interview with Maury Maverick, October
                            27, 1975. Interview A-0323. Southern Oral History Program Collection
                            (#4007)</title>
                        <title type="series">Series A. Southern Politics. Southern Oral History
                            Program Collection (A-0323)</title>
                        <author>Maury Maverick</author>
                    </titleStmt>
                    <extent>44 p.</extent>
                    <publicationStmt>
                        <publisher>Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina at
                            Chapel Hill</publisher>
                        <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace>
                        <date>27 October 1975</date>
                        <authority/>
                    </publicationStmt>
                    <notesStmt>
                        <note anchored="no">Interview conducted on October 27, 1975, by Chandler
                            Davidson; recorded in San Antonio, Texas.</note>
                        <note anchored="no"> Transcribed by Joe Jaros.</note>
                        <note anchored="no"> Forms part of: Southern Oral History Program Collection
                            (#4007): Series A. Southern Politics, Manuscripts Department, University
                            of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</note>
                        <note anchored="no">Original transcript on deposit at the Southern
                            Historical Collection, The Wilson Library, University of North Carolina
                            at Chapel Hill.</note>
                    </notesStmt>
                </biblFull>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <projectDesc>
                <p>The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-Chapel Hill digital library, <hi
                        rend="italics">Documenting the American South.</hi>
                </p>
            </projectDesc>
            <editorialDecl>
                <p>An audio file with the interview complements this electronic edition.</p>
                <p>The text has been entered using double-keying and verified against the original.</p>
                <p>The text has been encoded using the recommendations for Level 4 of the TEI in
                    Libraries Guidelines.</p>
                <p>Original grammar and spelling have been preserved. </p>
                <p>All quotation marks, em dashes and ampersand have been transcribed as entity
                    references.</p>
                <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as "</p>
                <p>All em dashes are encoded as —</p>
            </editorialDecl>
            <classDecl>
                <taxonomy id="lcsh">
                    <bibl>
                        <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings</title>
                    </bibl>
                </taxonomy>
                <taxonomy id="docsouth">
                    <bibl>
                        <title>Documenting the American South Topics</title>
                    </bibl>
                </taxonomy>
            </classDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
        <profileDesc>
            <langUsage>
                <language id="eng">English</language>
            </langUsage>
            <textClass>
                <keywords scheme="lcsh">
                    <list type="simple">
                        <item>
                            <!-- LC headings go here -->
                        </item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                <keywords scheme="docsouth">
                    <list type="main_topic">
                        <item>Politics &amp; Government <list type="sub-topic">
                                <item>Labor &amp; Unions</item>
                            </list>
                        </item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
            </textClass>
        </profileDesc>
        <revisionDesc>
            <change>
                <date>2007-00-00, </date>
                <respStmt>
                    <name>Celine Noel, Wanda Gunther, and Kristin Martin</name>
                    <resp/>
                </respStmt>
                <item> revised TEIHeader and created catalog record for the electronic
                edition.</item>
            </change>
            <change>
                <date>2007-11-20, </date>
                <respStmt>
                    <name>Jennifer Joyner </name>
                    <resp/>
                </respStmt>
                <item>finished TEI-conformant encoding and final proofing.</item>
            </change>
        </revisionDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text id="ohs_A-0323">
        <front>
            <div1 type="about_interview">
                <head>Interview with Maury Maverick, October 27, 1975. Interview A-0323.</head>
                <byline>Conducted by Chandler Davidson</byline>
                <note type="deposit" anchored="no">
                    <p>Transcript on deposit at The Southern Historical Collection, The Louis Round
                        Wilson Library</p>
                </note>
                <note type="citation" anchored="no">
                    <p>Citation of this interview should be as follows: <lb/>“Interview A-0323, in
                        the Southern Oral History Program Collection #4007, <lb/>Southern Historical
                        Collection, The Wilson Library, <lb/>University of North Carolina at Chapel
                        Hill”</p>
                </note>
                <note type="copyright" anchored="no">Copyright © 2007 The University of North
                    Carolina</note>
                <note type="transcription_note" anchored="no"/>
            </div1>
            <div1 type="abstract">
                <head>Abstract</head>
                <p>Maury Maverick Jr. was the son of Texas politician Maury Maverick Sr. Born in
                    1921, Maverick grew up in Texas but spent considerable time in Washington, D.C.,
                    during his father's tenure in Congress. Maverick argues that his experiences
                    with his father's political colleagues during his adolescence were particularly
                    influential in the formation of his own political views. After serving as a
                    Marine in World War II, Maverick earned his law degree. Then, following in his
                    father's footsteps, Maverick was elected to the Texas House of Representatives
                    in 1950. Serving for six years during the height of the McCarthy era, Maverick
                    refused to follow the political status quo. Working in tandem with other Texas
                    liberals and radicals, Maverick was a core member of the "Gashouse Gang" in the
                    state legislature. Named for their effort to place a tax on natural gas, the
                    Gashouse Gang worked to oppose anti-communist legislation during the 1950s.
                    Aside from his tenure in the state legislature, Maverick briefly pursued
                    politics at the national level, campaigning for Lyndon B. Johnson's vacated seat
                    in the United States Senate following the latter's election to the vice
                    presidency. Although he continued to involve himself in politics, serving
                    intermittently as a state committeeman for the Democratic Party, Maverick
                    primarily focused on practicing law throughout the 1960s and early 1970s.
                    Maverick describes in detail his legal advocacy for Vietnam draft resisters.
                    Throughout the interview, Maverick offers his thoughts on various Texan
                    politicians, including D. B. Hardeman, Sam Rayburn, Henry B. Gonzalez, and Bob
                    Eckhardt. He also speaks at length about the impact of various constituencies in
                    Texas on the evolution of liberal politics, focusing primarily on Chicano voters
                    and the labor movement. Maverick's lively and engaging recollections of his many
                    experiences offer researchers a revealing portrait of Texas liberalism during
                    the mid-twentieth century.</p>
            </div1>
            <div1 type="short_abstract">
                <head>Short Abstract</head>
                <p>Born into a long line of Texas politicians, Maury Maverick Jr. served in the
                    Texas House of Representatives for six years during the 1950s, and as a lawyer
                    from the 1960s into the 1970s. Maverick speaks at length about his radical
                    political leanings and the evolution of liberalism in Texas. </p>
            </div1>
        </front>
        <body>
            <div1 id="A-0323" type="sohp_interview">
                <head>Interview with Maury Maverick, October 27, 1975. <lb/>Interview A-0323.
                    Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007)</head>
                <list type="simple">
                    <head>Interview Participants</head>
                    <item>
                        <name id="spk1" key="mm" reg="Maverick, Maury" type="interviewee">MAURY
                            MAVERICK</name>, interviewee</item>
                    <item>
                        <name id="spk2" key="cd" reg="Davidson, Chandler" type="interviewer"
                            >CHANDLER DAVIDSON</name>, interviewer</item>
                </list>
                <div2 id="tape1-a" n="1-A" type="tape_side">
                    <pb id="p1" n="1"/>
                    <head>[TAPE 1, SIDE A]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 1, SIDE A]</p>
                    </note>
                    <milestone n="8002" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:00:00"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>This is October 27, 1975. I'm Chandler Davidson, Department of Sociology,
                            Rice University. I'm interviewing Mr. Maury Maverick Jr. in his law
                            office in San Antonio, Texas. Maury, I'd like to start by simply asking
                            you to tell me a little bit about your family and about when you were
                            born and growing up and how you eventually got into politics.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I was born on January 3, 1921, and my father was in the Congress of the
                            United States for two terms and was described as one of the leaders of
                            Franklin Roosevelt's Young Turks, along with Jerry Voorhis, who was the
                            man that Nixon defeated. I was in Voorhis's campaign in California when
                            Nixon beat him. I knew people all over the United States, including Dr.
                            Frank Graham, who was then president of the University of North Carolina
                            and whom my father held in great affection and respect. After I came
                            back from the Marine Corps, I ran for the Texas House of
                            Representatives, was in it for six years during the McCarthy period, got
                            out, had been state Democratic committeeman a time or two and I ran for
                            the United States Senate when Lyndon Johnson became vice president. I
                            came in fifth in a field of seventy-one candidates. Since then, I became
                            a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union and American Friends
                            Service Committee and independently represented war resisters of the
                            Vietnam war for about five or six years. Now, I've gone back to
                            representing people in divorces and being bored to death. <note
                                type="comment"> [Laughter] </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="8002" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:01:57"/>
                    <milestone n="7822" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:01:58"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>I guess that in a way, it doesn't make good sense to ask<pb id="p2" n="2"
                            /> the son of Maury Maverick when he first got interested in politics. I
                            imagine that came pretty early, didn't it?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, I never knew anything else in my life but politics, because my
                            first recollection of politics is when my father, then a very young man,
                            was Al Smith's campaign manager. The Ku Klux Klan still had some impact,
                            not much in San Antonio, because this is a Catholic town, but it took a
                            little spine to run Al Smith's campaign. That's the first campaign that
                            I remember in my life.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>That convention was in Houston, wasn't it?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. That's right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>The one that Jesse Jones brought to Houston.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Some people said that Jesse Jones hoped to get the nomination for having
                            brought it there.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, he did.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>So, your father managed Al Smith's campaign in Texas?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>In San Antonio.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>In San Antonio. How old were you at that time?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>It seems to me that I must have been about seven years old.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>But you were aware of what was happening?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I was aware of that campaign and I was aware of politics in terms of war
                            . . . my first recollection of my father when I was a very small child
                            would be hearing him cry out from wounds suffered in the Argonne Forest
                            and I used to go sit with him, he would get into a hot tub<pb id="p3"
                                n="3"/> of water to ease the pain and I would sit with him and he
                            would tell me that all war was wrong. He kept it up until Hitler began
                            and after he had marched through about seven countries, he called me up
                            and asked me, "Why in the hell aren't you in the Marine Corps or
                            something?" All that twenty-five years of pacificism went down the
                            drain, but that was another strong influence in my life.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Your father suffered from his war wounds most of his life, didn't he?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, yes. He was a semi-cripple all his life and he would almost stagger.
                            He would throw his body left to right and people would sometimes say
                            that he was drinking, and sometimes he was, but a lot of times, he just
                            couldn't walk even when he was cold sober.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>So then, when he went to Congress, were you involved in his campaigns at
                            that time?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, I knew about it. When I was a kid in Washington, you know, my
                            heroes were people like Jerry Voorhis and Hugo Black. Hugo Black was a
                            great favorite of the children of congressmen because Senator Black
                            would always stop and pat us on the head and treat us with great
                            dignity. He was a fine fellow and I remember when he got appointed to
                            the Court and all the liberals were raising hell in New York City, my
                            father went all over New York City talking to ACLU groups saying, "Give
                            this guy a chance. I don't care if he belonged to the Klan or not, he is
                            going to be all right. Give him a chance." I remember hearing about that
                            and was quite excited about it when I was a child.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7822" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:05:36"/>
                    <milestone n="7823" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:05:37"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Where did you go to college?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I went to the University of Texas and then after I got out of the Marine
                            Corps, I went to school for awhile at Loyola Law School on the West
                            Coast and finished here at St. Mary's Law School in<pb id="p4" n="4"/>
                            San Antonio.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>You were in the Marines how long?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Four and a half years.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>From when to when?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, from about 1942 to 1946.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>When your dad called you up and said, "Why aren't you in the Marines?"
                            did you go out and get in there? <note type="comment"> [Laughter]
                            </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, also it was after Pearl Harbor and I was flunking all my courses
                            and Dean Parlin, the Dean of Men at the University called me in and he
                            said, "We've figured out a way for you to get a degree." I said, "How?"
                            and he said, "Volunteer for the Marines." I said, "What are the
                            Marines?" "Just go on and volunteer, and you'll find out, Maury." <note
                                type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> That's how I got my degree.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>My father was in the Marines, too. So, you got out and your father was
                            living in California at that time?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yeah, he had moved to California to practice law out there and that
                            didn't turn out too well. I think that he got lonely and he wanted to
                            come home. He said, "I live out here in Los Angeles and if I get drunk
                            and fall down, my friends won't take me home. If I go back to San
                            Antonio and get drunk, even my enemies will take me home. I'm going back
                            home." So, we came back home.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>But you say that you were involved in Jerry Voorhis's campaign out
                        there.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, I was in Voorhis's campaign. I organized the Loyola Law Students for
                            Jerry Voorhis and I remember Voorhis at the time. I still correspond
                            with him. He's in a sort of a semi-rest home. His mind is very alert,
                            but his body is frail. Anyway, Nixon began to make<pb id="p5" n="5"/>
                            attacks on Jerry's patriotism. I remember sitting in his room with his
                            wife and children and Jerry was just wringing his hands and he was just
                            shocked that anyone would reflect on his loyalty to his country. So, he
                            made the mistake of debating Nixon, who pulled every kind of lowdown,
                            dirty, Red Scare kind of tactics on him. I think that Jerry was a tough
                            guy, but he was tough in a sensitive sort of shy, civilized kind of way.
                            He didn't know how to get into a hurly-burly debate and demagogue, like
                            I think he should have done. We told him to, but he said, "No, people
                            are going to think that I'm all right. I'm a good American and I don't
                            have to prove my patriotism." But by God, he should have, I guess.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>That was in what, '46 or '48?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>'46, I think.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>I guess that shortly after that campaign, you came back to Texas?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I came back to Texas and finished here at St. Mary's Law School and then
                            ran for the House of Representatives.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>That was when?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>It seems to me that it was 1950 to 1956, during the McCarthy period.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>You said that you spent six years in the House?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I spent six years in the Texas House of Representatives, got out and ran
                            for the Senate when Lyndon Johnson became vice president.<pb id="p6"
                                n="6"/> There were seventy-one candidates in the race. I was fifth
                            in the field of seventy-one. I was endorsed by organized labor. That's
                            the election in which John Tower became a senator.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>When you ran for the legislature here, you were representing what, Bexar
                            County?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I was running at-large, Bexar County.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How many representatives were there from Bexar County at that time?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I think there were four.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Were you the only liberal?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I was the only liberal at the time. That was the worst period I ever went
                            through. That was the days of the Red Scare and while during the Vietnam
                            War, it was plenty tough—if you want to talk about that later on, we
                            will—while it was plenty tough, it was nothing like the days of Joe
                            McCarthy. Because in addition to all the terror of McCarthy on a
                            national level, we had the bush league, new rich, ignoramus Texas style
                            attitudes to contend with in addition to everything else. They had bills
                            before the legislature such as to remove all books from libraries that
                            were critical of American history, Texas history, religion, or were in
                            any way agnostic, atheistic, or made fun of God or whatever, which, of
                            course, would remove all good books from the library. It got so bad, for
                            example, that the high school teachers' lobby of Texas, the Texas State
                            Teachers Association, endorsed the bill and not one college professor in
                            the whole state of Texas, I remember, spoke in opposition to that or any
                            other Red legislation. There were only four of us who voted against
                            outlawing the Communist party.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>In the entire House of Representatives?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p7" n="7"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. I was one of them. I voted for it my first term. I also . . . there
                            is a great story that Willie Morris tells in his book, <hi rend="i"
                                >North Toward Home</hi>, when Clarence Ayers, the great libertarian
                            professor was censured, it came up fast . . . what they would do, the
                            speaker would lay out these bills without having any committee
                            consideration and they would say terrible things about someone and you
                            wouldn't know whether they were true or not and you wouldn't know how to
                            vote. I'm trying to rationalize my cowardice now. Well, anyway, I ran
                            and hid in the men's room and they were looking for me and I pulled my
                            feet up so they wouldn't see me underneath the bottom of the toilet and
                            my father called me. He died not much long after that. He called me and
                            said, "Why in the hell didn't you vote against that resolution censuring
                            Clarence Ayers?" I said, "Well, Papa, I was hiding in the men's room."
                            He said, "Well, you are just a goddamn shithouse liberal." And he hung
                            up on me. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> That haunts me to
                            this moment.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>That was when, in '54?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Something like that, '54.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Your father died in '54?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yeah, around there. It was the McCarthy period and it was really the
                            worst thing. I killed for example, or rather I had the lead in killing
                            the Un-American Activities Committee in the last closing minutes of the
                            session, which by the way . . . like some southern left-wingers, I'm for
                            an unlimited filibuster because it is the reverse down South. We use the
                            filibuster. It is our weapon down here.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>The liberals?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>The liberals, yes. We use it. And while you don't<pb id="p8" n="8"/> have
                            a true filibuster, civilized conservatives that day let me filibuster.
                            The only time in six years. They didn't want to get out front, but the
                            speaker for the first time in six years gave me an unlimited gavel. I
                            never had it before and I never had it afterwards.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Who was the speaker at that time?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Reuben Senterfitt and a fellow by the name of Joe Kilgore who later went
                            to Congress. So, they let me stand up on the front microphone and on the
                            back microphone was a fellow named Edgar Berlin. They called it the
                            "snortin' pole," the one in the back. We stayed on the microphones for
                            over an hour. It was very dramatic. It was mainly aimed at professors at
                            the University of Texas and they kept turning the hands of the clock
                            back to get me off the microphone. I had a couple of people on both
                            sides of me physically holding on to the podium to keep from being
                            knocked down. Finally, with great fanfare, the Speaker said, "I declare
                            this session adjourned <hi rend="i">sine die.</hi>" It was a hell of a
                            thing, because if that thing had passed, it would have gone out and
                            kicked college teachers around all over the state of Texas. I again went
                            back to the men's room and vomited and almost started crying. It was the
                            worst goddamn thing that I ever went through in my life.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7823" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:14:50"/>
                    <milestone n="8003" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:14:51"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Looking back on this period in the legislature, do you see the civil
                            libertarian issues as the key issues of that period? Those are certainly
                            the ones that you seem to be identified with.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. It really is tied into economics, because when they talk about the
                            tidelands or they talk about not having adequate appropriations for old
                            people or not having first-rate hospitals, if they really wanted to get
                            the thirty-five of those like myself going down another road, they would
                            pull up a Red issue and we would talk about Red<pb id="p9" n="9"/>
                            issues while they were passing legislation that would gut the old people
                            or gut the hospitals or gut the educational system. So, we were
                            constantly on the defensive. This is an interesting thing that concerns
                            me. My father, when he was alive during the days of FDR, was doing
                            positive things. They were passing Social Security, of which he was the
                            coauthor. They were doing great things to insure bank deposits, TVA, and
                            so on. But I spent all my elective life fighting bad things. I never
                            really had a chance to be anything good, I just had to fight crappy
                            things all my life. I don't know what would happen now if I had a chance
                            to be for something good. I would probably think it was bad.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you see the race issue as playing pretty much the same function as the
                            Red issue did, kind of refocusing people's attention on noneconomic
                            issues?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Probably. Well, this busing business. It is the same that wiped Frank
                            Graham out at the University of North Carolina, because the Supreme
                            Court decision came down between the time of the primary and the runoff
                            and it wiped him out. We are going to have to have another walking
                            through the fire, I guess, over the busing issue and such as that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="8003" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:16:57"/>
                    <milestone n="7824" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:16:58"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Who were the names that you associate as leaders of the radical right
                            back in that period, the people who were really coming down hard on the
                            Communist issue and making it rough for liberals?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>There were the America First and some outfit out of Houston called The
                            Minute Women. They were middle-class and upper-middle-class women who
                            would come up and jeer at us and taunt us and stomp their feet. They
                            were the kind of people who spat on Adlai Stevenson in Dallas and tried
                            to hit him in the head with a picket sign<pb id="p10" n="10"/> and did
                            hit him with a picket sign. Then, there were elected officials, members
                            of the House.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Who were some of them?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Jack Cox, who later ran for governor. There are some others, I'll try to
                            think of their names later. Marshall Bell was the one from San Antonio
                            who was a man who introduced all the so-called anti-Red legislation.
                            There were bills such as "anyone who invokes the Fifth Amendment and
                            works for the State of Texas will be automatically fired." There was a
                            bill for awhile to give anyone the death penalty who belonged to the
                            Communist party. I remember that I had a hand in reducing that to life
                            imprisonment. That was a great liberal move at the time. <note
                                type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> Well hell, it sounds silly today,
                            but you know, God almighty, I was at least trying to keep the Reds from
                            being put in the electric chair and now, I feel like a damn fool even
                            talking about it. But at the time, it was damn important to win that
                            little victory. It's a cute story, I think. They tried to be fair about
                            outlawing the Communist party and all totalitarian organizations and I
                            went to see Archbishop Robert Luce of the Catholic Church, who was the
                            great left-wing labor bishop in his earlier days, and I told him, "Your
                            Excellency, I'm going to vote against that bill. I don't want you to
                            fall out with me." He said, "Well Maury, I don't want you to outlaw all
                            totalitarian organizations either." <note type="comment"> [Laughter]
                            </note> So, he was a good guy and he didn't fall out with me.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How about the newspapers at this point? Were there any of them on the
                            side of the libertarians?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>No, but it is a very strange thing. The first newspaper,<pb id="p11"
                                n="11"/> and all my liberal pals get mad at me when I say this, but
                            the first big important, liberal newspaper in Texas to come out against
                            the Communist legislation was the <hi rend="i">Dallas Morning
                        News.</hi></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>You say, "liberal" paper, you don't mean . . . .</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>No, the first daily paper. I don't mean "liberal" paper. The first was
                            the most reactionary of all newspapers. That was the one to take all
                            books from the libraries. My father had told me that there was a man who
                            had been in the first officers' training camp of World War I with him
                            who was the closet liberal on the <hi rend="i">Dallas Morning News.</hi>
                            I forget his name, but he said, "He's a civilized, good guy and if he
                            can do anything for you, he will." I sent him the bill to read and said,
                            "I hope that you will help us." About two weeks later, the <hi rend="i"
                                >Dallas Morning News</hi> editorialized against it and that gave the
                            other dailies a lot of courage. And then the <hi rend="i">San Antonio
                                News</hi> did, but the strange thing about it is that the so-called
                            "worst" newspaper in Texas was the first to really stand up. Of course,
                            the <hi rend="i">Texas Observer</hi> and Willie Morris and before him
                            and Ronnie Dugger were always good, but that wasn't a daily
                        newspaper.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How about the <hi rend="i">Corpus Christi Caller-Times</hi>?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, the <hi rend="i">Caller-Times</hi> has come along since then, in
                            terms of its liberalism, because of Ed Hare, who is down there now and
                            who is a good friend of mine and a first-rate good man. He backed Nixon,
                            much to the chagrin of his children, who are raising hell with him this
                            last time. But day in and day out, it is probably the best newspaper in
                            Texas.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>But at that time, they really didn't support you?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, they were on day in and day out, with Governor Shivers and with the
                            power structure, but the Hares were always civilized<pb id="p12" n="12"
                            /> people and it sort of helped their conscience every now and then to
                            have a cup of coffee with a liberal and I think they tried to like us as
                            much as they could. They didn't like us as much as they should have, but
                            they did better than anybody else.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>At the time that you were fighting these battles, what percentage of the
                            Texas House would you consider to be liberal?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>They called us The Gashouse Gang in those days because we tried to put a
                            natural gas tax across and we did, which was declared unconstitutional.
                            There were about thirty-five of us.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Thirty-five out of 150.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Out of 150.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How many in the Senate?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Four, maybe. Four or five out of thirty. </p>
                        <milestone n="7824" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:22:53"/>
                        <milestone n="8004" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:22:54"/>
                        <p>The guy that was the most important person in the House of
                            Representatives in those days was D. B. Hardeman, who was Homer Rainey's
                            campaign manager and later went on to be Adlai Stevenson's advance man
                            and then later was a professor at a little college in Washington, D.C.,
                            and then was Sam Rayburn's research assistant. Sam Rayburn, I think,
                            virtually died in his arms. Now, Hardeman is the leading authority on
                            the history of the Congress of the United States and lectures for the
                            Brookings Institute in Washington, D.C., and is worth a tape of his
                        own.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Hardeman is from where? What was he representing when he was in the
                            House?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, he's from Goliad, but he was representing Denison, Texas.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>And how long was he in the House, what period was this?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I think that he was in the House two terms when I was there. He got
                            beaten on a totally irrelevant issue. He got<pb id="p13" n="13"/> beaten
                            on the farmers . . . they beat him largely because he voted for a bill
                            that would require people to have liability insurance on their
                            automobiles. That was a terribly unpopular thing at the time. Then, the
                            lobby understood something about Hardeman and that is that liberals not
                            only don't speak to conservatives, they don't speak to one another. But
                            at night time, Hardeman would get us together in his apartment and he
                            would read poetry and he would read inaugural addresses of presidents
                            and we'd all drink whiskey and plot floor maneuvers the next day, and he
                            was a very gentle and sweet and kind person and made everybody love one
                            another and be tolerant of one another. I think the lobby recognized
                            this about him and so they went after him. I think that he was the most
                            important person in the House of Representatives in my period.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Was Bob Eckhardt in the House at the time?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Bob Eckhardt was a labor CIO lobbyist when I was there. He used to sit up
                            in the gallery. He's as smart as hell, he's the smartest guy you ever
                            saw. He could write an intricate amendment to an intricate bill and he
                            would send it down to us on the floor. He was our research assistant.
                            The great tragedy of the liberals is that they are all so poor. They
                            needed teachers and research people doing work for them. We were so . .
                            . our time was so taken up with the logistics of just fighting on the
                            floor all the time, we never had any good research and the teachers were
                            getting scared then to talk to us. They were plenty scared. The law
                            school wouldn't talk to us. No one would hardly talk to us in those
                            days. We had no research assistants. The natural gas tax we passed was
                            Huey Long's gas tax. We thought it was a good one and we were so proud
                            of that victory and then later on, the<pb id="p14" n="14"/> Supreme
                            Court knocked it out immediately as a tax on interstate commerce.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>The U.S. Supreme Court?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, the U.S. Supreme Court. And afterwards, we found out that the reason
                            it hadn't been taken up in Louisiana was that Huey called the oil and
                            gas people and he really ran the state and he said, "You sons of bitches
                            take this case up to the Supreme Court and have this law declared
                            unconstitutional and I'll give you a constitutional law that you'll wish
                            to God you'd never had." I don't know whether that's true or not, but
                            anyway we took Huey's bill and it didn't work. We didn't have any power
                            in the governor's office.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Who were some of the other members of the Gashouse Gang?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, the four that voted against outlawing the Communist party were
                            myself, Doug Crouch, who is now in Fort Worth, A. D.
                            Downer&#x2014;"Buffalo" Downer, he's a labor leader in Houston
                            now&#x2014;and Edgar Berlin, who's a lawyer with the federal
                            government nowdays. The first guy to make a stand when I was there was a
                            little guy named John Barnhart out of Houston. He is a lawyer in Houston
                            and he . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>He was in the House?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>He was in the House and when the thing came up to outlaw the Communist
                            party . . . he voted against the Professor Ayers resolution that I went
                            and hid in the toilet on, but then when the Communist thing came up, he
                            cast a "present, but not voting" button. He was the only one in the
                            House. He was from Beeville. He was all but run out of Beeville. He was
                            a Catholic and he had trouble with his church and he got in trouble in a
                            little country town and he later moved<pb id="p15" n="15"/> Houston and
                            now, you know, they always say, "Well, why be the only one?" Well, if
                            nothing else, at the time he made me ashamed of myself and to this day,
                            everytime I see him I wince and want to hide from him, although we're
                            close friends, because he reminds me of my own lack of courage. I think
                            that is the reason that people loathe and despise people of conscience—
                            because they remind you of your own lack of courage and your own lack of
                            vision. Johnny was just virtually hounded out of Beeville.<ref id="ref1"
                                target="n1">1</ref> He is in Houston today, doing good. He is a
                            swell guy.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, I know him.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>The only thing that I've got against him is that he was a cheerleader
                            when he was at the University of Texas. If I can get over that, then
                            he's a great guy. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Who were some of the other liberals in that period who were in the
                            legislature?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>A semi-liberal of the period, that people don't seem to understand or
                            believe anymore, was Dolph Briscoe, the present governor of Texas. He
                            didn't have a super left-wing voting record, but he had a very civilized
                            voting record and was a very decent man. It is almost impossible to
                            explain that to younger people your age, maybe. I don't know you
                            personally, but it is hard to get the younger generation to understand
                            that. He was a good legislator and well liked. He did some fine things.
                            He never, during the McCarthy era, would go out of his way to sponsor
                            bad stuff or hurt anybody or be cruel. I never saw him be cruel to
                            anybody in my life. Now, when you get down to the final vote, he would
                            go for it, but the little ancillary votes, to send it back to committee,
                            to table it, he would go with the side of constitutional liberty. He was
                            a pretty good guy.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How about his vote on economic issues?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p16" n="16"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Pretty good. He was better than the average. I would put him in the upper
                            fifty percent. He was a multimillionaire, but he voted for some things
                            that would have hurt his own pocketbook. He was the father, largely, of
                            farm-to-market roads. Of course, he had the biggest ranches in Texas and
                            it helped him some, but for country people, that's a great thing. Sam
                            Rayburn used to . . . Sam Rayburn told me that when the national highway
                            lobby came through Congress and said, "We're going to build these
                            superhighways across America," Mr. Rayburn said, "You're not going to
                            build these highways across America unless you have farm-to-market roads
                            for country people. I lived up in north Texas and couldn't get into town
                            on Saturday. The roads were muddy, the Model T Fords wouldn't run and
                            before that, the wagons couldn't get through the mud and you are not
                            going to build these highways unless you give these country people
                            farm-to-market roads." So, old man Rayburn may be the father of
                            farm-to-market roads and even among the liberal movement, that was a
                            good issue in those days.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, let's talk a minute about Sam Rayburn. There has been a biography
                            of him published in the last few months, a very flattering and favorable
                            biography. I noticed that some of the criticisms of it have been that it
                            was too flattering and that it makes Rayburn out to be more of a man of
                            the people than he really was. What about Rayburn? How would you fit him
                            into the liberal-conservative spectrum?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, there is another book coming out on Rayburn by D. B. Hardeman and
                            Don Bacon. Hardeman, as I said, was his research assistant for
                        years.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>And Hardeman was a well-known liberal?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. And Hardeman would be an interesting . . . it will be interesting to
                            see what D. B. says about him. I think of him (Rayburn) more as a<pb
                                id="p17" n="17"/> superb mechanic than I do as an idea man, although
                            he had good ideas. He was the guy that Franklin Roosevelt would get to
                            get things through the House. Roosevelt with that Yankee, upstate New
                            York accent couldn't talk to the boys in the back room as much and as
                            well as old Sam Rayburn did and Rayburn was a faithful lieutenant. He
                            was a first-rate mechanic. He got my father to introduce the bill to
                            enlarge the Supreme Court of the United States, and which helped get him
                            beaten for reelection to the Congress. So, he stuck with Roosevelt all
                            the way through. He got a little tired of Ivy League intellectuals who
                            hung around Roosevelt and they gave him a pain in the neck sometimes,
                            but I would say that he was a superb mechanic and a decent old man.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>What about his relation to the oil and gas industry?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, I think that he kind of took care of them. I remember in the Adlai
                            Stevenson race in Dallas the first time around, the two co-campaign
                            managers, and I had a hand in doing this, were D. B. Hardeman and Blind
                            Jim Sewell, the district judge from Corsicana and a swell guy. Old man
                            Rayburn was the titular head and I remember Rayburn sitting around with
                            a drink of bourbon in his hand saying, "Those sons of bitches, we took
                            care of them on the depletion allowance and now they are running out on
                            us." And they did run out on the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party
                            did take care of them on it—and that worries me—and there are a lot of
                            things about the Democratic Party that worry me, the loyalty
                            investigations of Harry Truman and the fact that we seem to have the
                            capacity to get into wars a little bit too easy.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>You feel that Rayburn in his heart of hearts was more a man of the people
                            than not and that he accommodated himself to oil and gas simply as a
                            practical necessity?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p18" n="18"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. I think that he was an old-fashioned populist. My father's campaign
                            slogan was "Liberty and Groceries." It's a great slogan. An economist at
                            UCLA used that on a thesis one time. I think he called it that, "Liberty
                            and Groceries," and old man Rayburn understood what liberty and
                            groceries were.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How about Lyndon Johnson? How would you classify him? Can you classify
                            him?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Lyndon worked in my father's office at night time when he was working for
                            Dick Kleberg and my father was responsible more than anyone for getting
                            Lyndon as head of the NYA in Texas. As Lyndon got more popular and my
                            father got less popular, Lyndon would more and more say, "Sam Rayburn is
                            just like my daddy and got me that job," but that isn't so. Aubrey
                            Williams, who was head of the NYA, wrote my father and said, "Maury, you
                            did it." And there's a very interesting call, I got a call from Lyndon
                            Johnson's brother, who all the rest of the family has fallen out with .
                            . . I forget his name right now . . . .</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Sam?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Sam Johnson. He called me about six months ago and said that he hadn't
                            had a drink, "I'm not drunk now and haven't had a drink in two years and
                            before I die, I want you to know that your father had more to do with
                            getting Lyndon that NYA job than anybody in Texas. Some of the family is
                            denying it now but I want to tell you that before I die." He did tell me
                            that and it was true. I don't know, Lyndon was a superb guy. You can't
                            forget the Vietnam War, but if you could for a minute and think about
                            what he did on Medicare and all the other things . . . if it hadn't been
                            for the Vietnam War, I think that he would have ranked among the top two
                            or three or four or five presidents. I do<pb id="p19" n="19"/> think
                            that history is going to be harder on Jack Kennedy than it is on Lyndon
                            Johnson. That may be a Texas prejudice. I got down awfully hard on Ivy
                            League, Georgetown intellectuals that were egging that war on and
                            talking about the domino theory and I think that Lyndon inherited that
                            war and he was insecure about what to do with all the people that he
                            thought were smarter than he was. I wrote him a letter one time and I
                            said, "Mr. President, the Vietnam War is like the west side of San
                            Antonio where the Mexicans live. When you campaigned with my father
                            sitting on one side of you and Paul Kilday, who beat him for Congress,
                            sitting on the other side of you, you went from precinct to precinct and
                            you understood how to cope with that and handle that incipient
                            revolution among those Mexicans over there, and there isn't a damn bit
                            of difference between the west side of San Antonio and Vietnam. You'd
                            better look out, these intellectuals and so on that are talking about
                            dominoes, they don't know what in the hell they are talking about. You
                            fall back on your own Texas instincts." I don't know if he ever read the
                            letter or not. I think that it's partly because I'm not smart enough to
                            go to Princeton or Harvard or Yale myself, but I've gotten awfully down
                            on the eggheads during the Vietnam War. That may be unfair, because
                            there are a lot of good eggheads that lived to fight against it, but . .
                            . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>A lot of them on the other side.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>A lot of them on the other side, keeping their own kids out of the war. I
                            haven't gotten over that yet.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="8004" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:38:35"/>
                    <milestone n="7825" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:38:36"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, you were very much involved in defending draft resisters at that
                            period, weren't you?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I spent five years representing draft resisters and being<pb id="p20"
                                n="20"/> excited about it. I have young kids that are all over the
                            United States now, who are "my kids" that I saved from going to the
                            penitentiary or being killed. I want to tell you an interesting thing
                            about the draft. Unlike most of the people in ACLU, of which I am a
                            member of the national advisory committee and I am also a contributing
                            attorney for the American Friends Service Committee, I'm for a draft
                            army over a volunteer army. The reason for it is that I learned
                            something. The reason is that all of the radicalism and the dissent
                            against the Vietnam War, virtually all of it, came from the middle and
                            upper classes that were caught up in the draft. Blacks and browns were
                            escaping from the ghettos and escaping from a second-rate war to a
                            first-rate war. They got better guns in the Vietnam War, they got a
                            pension, they got a medal, they didn't go to the penitentiary, they were
                            escaping from something that really was almost worse than what they had
                            back where they lived. Whereas the kids in the middle class, the swanky
                            parts of Texas and North Carolina or wherever, they knew what they were
                            going to lose and that's where the radicalism came from. It's an
                            interesting thing, I don't want to talk too long, but it is an
                            interesting thing that over fifty percent of my enlisted men clients
                            were kids from small Catholic colleges who had been educated enough in
                            these little rinky-dink Catholic colleges by the brothers and priests
                            and lay teachers to know that they were getting rooked, but because they
                            were Irish or Italian or German and not socially powerful enough to put
                            a fix on the draft board like we Episcopalians and Presbyterians could
                            do. Well, those were the ones who raised hell. Now, among the doctors,
                            over half of them are Jewish, but there is a different set of historical
                            reasons that we could talk about forever. </p>
                        <p>The reason that San Antonio was so important as a conscientious objector
                            center was that this was where the 1-A-O conscientious objectors were
                            sent. That means<pb id="p21" n="21"/> the guy who can be the medic. They
                            got down here and they began to see that the mission of the medic was
                            ultimately to kill people just like the infantryman because they were to
                            "sustain the fighting force," or words to that effect. That was the
                            motto. Kids would constantly be lectured in terms of getting a man back
                            on the battlefield to kill someone. So, they would have a change. They
                            would change from 1-A-0 to 1-0 and that's when they would come to see
                            me. I was the only lawyer in town representing them until a young lawyer
                            named Jerry Goldstein came along, who I trained and who became better at
                            it than I was, and then another one named Leonard Schwartz, two young
                            Jewish lawyers and myself. Only three lawyers out of over two thousand
                            that would walk into a court for those kids voluntarily. The thing that
                            I always resented and resent today, is that during the time when the
                            Vietnam War was still popular, I would walk into a federal court with a
                            poor little kid that didn't want to murder anybody and he would be
                            shaking in his boots and I would be shaking in mine and we would be
                            treated more rudely than . . . I would make maybe five hundred dollars
                            and we would be treated more rudely than a lawyer who would walk in with
                            a heroin pusher and making a $15,000 fee and caught with fifty pounds of
                            heroin in the back of a trunk somewhere. It was rough.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Treated rudely by whom?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I mean treated rudely by people like the marshałs, who would sort of
                            hover near you like someone was going to blow up the court or the judges
                            would be sharp to you, "Sit down, Counselor," and talk to you in a rough
                            kind of way as if you really had some dangerous person with you. I must
                            say, though, that the federal judiciary, particularly the Fifth Circuit
                            in New Orleans, gave us the great relief that we needed. I<pb id="p22"
                                n="22"/> think the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
                            maybe saved the Old South from actually going into open rebellion. The
                            finest judge among all of them was a Republican appointee by Eisenhower
                            named Minor Wisdom, out of New Orleans. He had organized Louisiana for
                            Eisenhower over Taft and he had a very conservative background and he
                            got on the bench and became the most humane man on the bench, I think,
                            today.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>He's still on there, isn't he?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>He's still on there and he's a great old man.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Why were so few of your fellow lawyers willing to take these cases? How
                            do you explain that?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, it's related to patriotism, you know. It's a lack of patriotism to
                            not back your country in time of war and it was the second most
                            terrifying thing that I went through in my life. The McCarthy era was
                            worse, but I was older and smarter and my skin was thicker and didn't
                            give a damn as much. But, there was this question of whether you loved
                            your country or not and people were checking on me. I knew that I was
                            under surveillance. I would go out to the military bases and sometimes
                            the military police would follow me. Since then, I've talked to people
                            who said that they would say, "Maury Maverick is now driving into the
                            base," and they would have a condition read as if someone from Mars was
                            landing at Galveston. Sometimes when I would talk to kids in a parking
                            lot . . . they wouldn't let them come to my office, I had to talk to
                            them in a parking lot, well, the MPs would circle me and one time, I got
                            my associate, Herschel Bernard, who is Jewish, to come and help me and a
                            big MP came up, looked like he was about six feet, seven inches tall and
                            damn near weighed three hundred pounds. He had his fists doubled up and
                            looked like he was going to beat us up and I said, "Sergeant, if you are
                            going to beat<pb id="p23" n="23"/> anybody up, beat my law partner up.
                            He's Jewish." <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> And the sergeant
                            had a sense of humor and he started laughing and Herky Bernard said,
                            "You son of a bitch, speak for yourself." <note type="comment">
                                [Laughter] </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, this isn't the first time that you've been "surveilled," as they
                            say. The FBI or somebody has been on your tail for many years, haven't
                            they?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I guess so.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7825" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:46:18"/>
                    <milestone n="8005" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:46:19"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>You mentioned the other day to me over the phone, for example, that when
                            you went out to El Paso to speak . . . what was the story there with
                            Malcolm McGregor?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, I ran for the senate and the only ones that would let me talk to
                            them was the Unitarian Church and he said, "There'll be more FBI agents
                            outside taking down license plate numbers than there will be people
                            inside listening to you." That was true and not only that, I got in
                            there and these goddamn Unitarians weren't satisfied that I was for
                            letting Red China into the United Nations twenty years ago, they kept on
                            bringing up worse and worse left-wing issues, and if I had any chance of
                            getting elected to the senate before I talked to those five Unitarians,
                            I didn't have any after it was over with. <note type="comment">
                                [Laughter] </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Did the knowledge that the FBI was on your tail exert any dampening
                            effect on your ardor?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>No, it didn't bother me. The thing that worried me, the thing that was
                            discouraging to me and that was only about eighteen, fifteen or twenty
                            years ago, I remember going into east Texas, campaigning in deep east
                            Texas and I had a local campaign manager, I remember, and I was working
                            through the courthouse and I shook hands with a black person and my
                            liberal manager took me off to the side and said, "You will not shake<pb
                                id="p24" n="24"/> hands with a black person." I had no idea that I
                            was being liberal or brave or anything else, I wanted his goddamn vote.
                            It never entered my mind . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>This was in '61?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. And my press secretary was Ronnie Dugger, who was the editor of the
                                <hi rend="i">Texas Observer</hi> and a great guy. We went into one
                            town with him one day and the manager in that town, whose name shall
                            remain anonymous, saw Ronnie Dugger walk up with me and he said, "Why
                            have you got Ronnie Dugger with you? Everybody in east Texas knows that
                            Ronnie Dugger would sleep with a nigger woman." And instead of Dugger
                            being a good press agent and going out to the car, he said, "Yes, I'd
                            sleep with a nigger woman, you son of a bitch, what's it to you?" So, I
                            lost a manager right there and had to get out of town. I told Dugger,
                            "Will you please wait until the campaign is over before voicing your
                            sexual preferances and I will appreciate it." <note type="comment">
                                [Laughter] </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="8005" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:49:09"/>
                    <milestone n="7826" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:49:10"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>A lot of liberals back in 1961 were kind of appalled to see both you and
                            Henry B. Gonzalez, both well-known liberals, running against each other
                            on the ticket there in that special senatorial election. What is and
                            what was your relation with Henry Gonzalez and what effect did that
                            have?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>We have sort of an Alphonse and Gaston relationship. We're polite to each
                            other. He and I should have talked to one another. That taught me
                            something about vanity. He wouldn't talk to me and I wouldn't talk to
                            him. What I should have done and what he should have done, is pick up
                            the telephone and say, "Look Henry, you get out of the race or I'll get
                            out of the race—we'll flip." In retrospect, I know I should have done
                            that, but it was two liberals who were too proud and too vain and too
                            foolish to talk to one<pb id="p25" n="25"/> another. That was a jackass
                            stunt on my part and it was on Henry's, too. I don't know how to explain
                            that. It is just one of those things, sort of like two college
                            professors in the same department that are good guys and won't talk to
                            one another and are damn fools. That happens to you teachers all the
                            time and it happened to me. It was a mistake.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>But both of you were very similar in your political beliefs?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, but I think . . . yes, I think so. You see, Henry wiped me out in
                            San Antonio among the Mexicans where I had been strong and my father was
                            strong. That polished me off from going to Congress.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>That particular race did?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. That ended my chances of going to the U.S. House of
                        Representatives.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, if you had gone, you would probably have gone from the seat that
                            Henry now has.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I would have gone from the seat that Henry has gone from, but it would
                            have been interesting to see what I would have done with this
                            Pentagon-oriented society. I often wonder whether I would have been a
                            hawk on Vietnam if I had been in Congress because Henry was a very
                            studied hawk on Vietnam. He would come down in Air Force One and he was
                            a hawk against Castro and he was a hawk on the Dominican Republic and I
                            don't know what the hell I would have been. Because, it is one thing not
                            to be in Congress and talk about it and another thing to be there.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>You are suggesting that his hawkishness here might have had something to
                            do with what you call San Antonio's "Pentagon economy"?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. You know, this whole town makes its living off the Pentagon. I made
                            my living off the Pentagon by fighting it. I made maybe<pb id="p26"
                                n="26"/> $500 or $750 a case when other lawyers were making $3000 to
                            $15,000 a case, but whatever living I was making, I was making off the
                            Pentagon as an enemy of the Pentagon. We all live off the Pentagon in
                            San Antonio.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7826" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:52:25"/>
                    <milestone n="8006" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:52:26"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>You know Bob Hall, I guess, in Houston.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Not well. I used to know him. He is a good fellow. He's a labor lawyer
                            there, isn't he?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, he was performing pretty much the same function there that you were
                            performing here, insofar as being one of the few people who were
                            identified as being willing to handle the draft cases.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. Johnny Barnhart handled some, too.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Bob Hall is a good fellow and I think that he is with that lawyer . . .
                            the one who has the Greek name?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Chris Dixie.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Dixie, yeah. He is a good guy. A very fine lawyer in Austin is David
                            Richards, who has just filed a lawsuit for the members of the University
                            of Texas faculty who were denied merit increases although their chairman
                            of their departments recommended them for it. There is a big fight going
                            on against the new president of the University of Texas and Richards is
                            the lawyer for them.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How about Dave Shapiro, do you know him?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I know Dave Shapiro pretty well. He is a bright guy and a very cynical
                            guy and he would always manage to write extremely withering invectives
                            against me in behalf of Henry Gonzalez. So, you know, I don't go around
                            singing his praises all the time, but he was a good guy and a good
                            liberal. He was just for Henry and against me.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>That's rather ironic. I was talking to him awhile ago and he<pb id="p27"
                                n="27"/> seems to be rather disenchanted with Henry these days.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, I would rank Henry among the top three to five congressmen from
                            Texas, Bob Eckhardt of Houston is the best and I think worthy of being
                            the president of the United States of America. A great and fine man.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How about Barbara Jordan?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, I don't know. If she had had a white skin, she might have been a
                            southern lady. I don't know, I'm not as comfortable around her and I
                            don't know why. I think that she is probably one of the better
                            representatives from Texas, but I'm not as enthusiastic about her as a
                            lot of people are.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Would you say that Eckhardt is pretty much in the Maverick mold? Do you
                            see a sort of continuity here between your father's career and that of
                            Eckhardt?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Bob is a lot smoother fellow than my father. My father was an abrasive
                            guy who was the youngest of eleven children and he had ten brothers and
                            sisters that picked on him . . . youngest of ten or eleven, I forget.
                            There were plenty of them. Anyway, he would get into a fistfight with
                            his older brothers and sisters and Alistair Cooke called him the "bad
                            boy of the New Deal who always had his fists up." Bob is a more
                            slow-talking and gracious and polite person than my father was. My
                            father would call somebody a son of a bitch and have a fistfight and
                            then go on to something else. He didn't carry grudges, though. Henry
                            Gonzalez, for example, if you fall out with Henry and he knocks you
                            down, the battle isn't over with. He will grind you and grind you with
                            his heel, figuratively speaking, with your face into the ground until
                            you are a bloody pulp. When my father had a fight and knocked you out or
                            got knocked out and when he was mayor of San Antonio . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p28" n="28"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Are you speaking figuratively here?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Figuratively, yes. He would hire the widows of all his enemies and give
                            them jobs, things like that. Henry is a tough guy and I imagine that
                            Barbara Jordan is the same way, but Bob is I think equally courageous
                            and equally intellectual, but he is a smoother guy. I don't mean that in
                            a saracastic way, he's just a gentle, soft-spoken guy.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="8006" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:57:02"/>
                    <milestone n="7827" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:57:03"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>You just suggested a minute ago that Bob would make a fine president of
                            the United States. He doesn't seem to have that ambition, though, does
                            he?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, a lot of people who would make a good president of the United
                            States know that they can't be president. I think that I would make a
                            good appellate justice, a federal appellate justice, but I'm not ever
                            going to get to be one. Bob is realistic. He said that he would rather
                            "hang from the tit of his congressional district in Harris County than
                            cling to the cold bosom of Texas." That probably is a realistic thing
                            and it's probably the truth. He couldn't go anywhere in Texas, I don't
                            think. They would do a job on him and they may do a job on him in
                            Houston before it's all over. His great threat is that some member of
                            the minority is going to run against him and polish him off like they
                            polished me off in Bexar County. The white Anglo liberal in the South is
                            going to more and more become a gadfly and he is going to have to
                            understand that about himself. That's important. That's all right. I'm a
                            gadfly and I understand that role, but now that the Supreme Court has
                            said that you run in smaller legislative districts instead of
                            countywide, the blacks are going to elect blacks for another hundred
                            years and the browns are going to elect browns. Where in the hell is a
                            white liberal<pb id="p29" n="29"/> going to get elected in the smaller
                            races in Texas? There is nowhere in Bexar County that I can run. I don't
                            have a constituency anymore. That wiped out, I think, the white liberals
                            in the smaller races in Texas.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>So far as electoral politics goes?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. It may be all right, because it is right for blacks and browns to
                            have their own liberals and it's OK, but I think that the white liberal
                            has to understand that about himself and not worry about it, sort of be
                            like Wayne Morse was when he got in and not worry every five minutes
                            about being reelected and understand that you are not and go on and play
                            your role.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you think that for the middle-aged white liberal that is a role that
                            he can accept gracefully, to give his electoral base to the
                        minorities?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, he will act like he is graceful about it. I am not so damn gracious
                            about it now in the deep recesses of my heart because I think that I
                            would be a better legislator than some of the blacks and browns. I'm
                            getting a little reverse Jim Crow and I don't like it and hell, I don't
                            have to like it just because I'm white and Protestant, I don't have to
                            like it. I would at least like to get beaten for the right reasons if I
                            am going to get beaten. I think that is a phase that we are going to go
                            through.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7827" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="01:00:15"/>
                    <milestone n="8007" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="01:00:16"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, I know that you have to go out of town today, so . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>If you want to talk to me some more, go ahead.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>If you've got a little more time, I'll . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Go ahead.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>I'll sure do it. You say when, because I could go on and on.<pb id="p30"
                                n="30"/> I would like to get back a little bit to some of the
                            history of the famous convention fights back in the '50s. Did you go to
                            the national convention or were you involved in national convention
                            politics back in 1952 when the Maverick delegation was contesting its
                            seats with the Shivers delegation?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I was not at that convention. My father was up there and like all the
                            sons of fairly famous fathers, when he was doing his stuff, I would go
                            off somewhere else. I have a complex about that and I wanted to be my
                            own man and make my own light shine under the basket. My father was such
                            a powerful personality that I felt dwarfed by him and so, when he was
                            operating, I would get out of the way. There's another story that Willie
                            Morris tells and this really happened. After my father had had about his
                            fifth heart attack, I went in to see him and he was dead an hour later
                            or two hours later and he said, "I want to give you a compliment, Maury
                            Jr." I said, "What is it, Papa?" He said, "Well, you didn't turn out to
                            be as big . . . "</p>
                    </sp>
                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>[END OF TAPE 1, SIDE A]</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                </div2>
                <div2 id="tape1-b" n="1-B" type="tape_side">
                    <head>[TAPE 1, SIDE B]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 1, SIDE B]</p>
                    </note>
                    <pb id="p31" n="31"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Those were the last words that my dad spoke to me. So, when he was alive,
                            he was such a powerful guy that I would get in the background. I've
                            noticed that the children of famous people, it is awful hard for them
                            not to be alcoholics or washouts because they are constantly compared to
                            their father or mother. If my father had stayed alive another ten or
                            fifteen years, I don't know what the hell I would have done myself, so
                            it is tough.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>To get back to that convention, maybe you will remember what was involved
                            there. It was a case of Shivers leading one set of delegates and your
                            father . . . I believe that the state convention was in San Antonio and
                            your father led a rump convention to La Villita and so they both went up
                            there trying to get seated and according to at least one account that
                            I've read, Rayburn initially wanted to see your dad's delegation seated
                            and Lyndon Johnson had a long talk with Shivers and Shivers convinced
                            him that he ought to have his delegates seated.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I think that my father told me that they had promised him, indicated to
                            him that he would be seated. Then, you will remember that on the floor,
                            Shivers took the microphone and said he would support the nominee, as I
                            recall. Right on national TV and then came back home two weeks later and
                            double-crossed the people that he made this national commitment to. Now,
                            a very interesting thing happened, I don't know what that had to do with
                            it, but I remember one night that the telephone rang and Adlai Stevenson
                            called my father and he said, "Maury, what should I<pb id="p32" n="32"/>
                            do about the tidelands? I am worried to death about it, everybody from
                            Texas is hitting me about the tidelands." He said, "Well, if you want to
                            get elected, you had better lie about it, but if you want to tell the
                            truth, you had better say that Texas is like the rest of the United
                            States and not any more entitled to offshore oil than any other state in
                            the union. It is just a goddamn lie that Texas should be any different
                            from any other state in the union. So, that's the choice, Adlai, that
                            you are going to have to make." Stevenson came out and said that the
                            tidelands should belong to all the people of the United States of
                            America. When I was in the legislature later on, that was almost on par
                            with the Red issue, you just talked about tidelands. They wouldn't talk
                            about hospitals, you couldn't talk about anything, it just had to be
                            tidelands, tidelands, tidelands. That was a scary thing in the old
                        days.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Did the tidelands issue come up in the way of any votes in the Texas
                            legislature?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>You've made me think about something. I was looking through some old
                            letters the other day, where I wrote Justice William O. Douglas. The
                            first week that I was in the Texas House of Representatives, there was a
                            bill to impeach William O. Douglas because he had written the tidelands
                            decision. As I remember it, only seven of us voted against it. Well, we
                            were so green that we didn't know how to ask for a record vote and we
                            had an electric voting system, they have green lights and red lights up
                            on the panel for about fifteen or twenty seconds and there were seven
                            votes against impeachment of Douglas and I was one of them. I remember
                            seeing the names up there, I didn't know who in the hell they were, but
                            it was a rough vote, really a rough vote. I think that I<pb id="p33"
                                n="33"/> remet D. B. Hardeman and "Blind Jim" Sewell from Corsicana.
                            There were seven of us and from that nucleus of seven people, sort of
                            like the Christians in the catacombs, we expanded into the Gashouse
                            Gang.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>That was kind of the first vote that brought you . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I think that in my mind, that was the first vote that ushered in the
                            so-called Gashouse Gang and then we expanded from about seven to
                            thirty-five.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>What was the effect of that vote? Was it merely a resolution?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>A resolution. I wrote Douglas about it and he wrote me back as mad as
                            hell about it and he wanted me to explain it and so I wrote back and
                            forth to him for about six weeks, explaining it to him. He didn't like
                            it at all.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Not the last time they attempted to impeach him.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>No.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>You also were involved in presidential politics in 1960, weren't you?
                            Didn't you work pretty hard in the Kennedy-Johnson campaign?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I worked pretty hard in the Kennedy-Johnson thing, I was state
                            committeeman for awhile and then I was . . . .</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How long were you state committeeman?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Off and on for either four or six years, I forget. I was state
                            committeeman when Jack Kennedy came down here and was killed. Ralph
                            Yarborough claimed that also was an effort to do him in and I think he's
                            right. Everybody denies it, but I think that it's right. I think that he
                            is right because although I was state committeeman, the John Connally
                            people were running the party and I was not given a pass to go into the
                            airport to meet the presidential nominee of my party although I<pb
                                id="p34" n="34"/> was state committeeman. I was stopped at the
                            airport. So, I went down to south San Antonio to the military base and
                            was standing along the fence when he came along and I introduced myself
                            to Kennedy. That was the day before he was killed. He said, "Didn't
                            somebody in your family write <hi rend="i">Washington Wife</hi>?" A
                            great-aunt of mine, Ellen Maury Slaton, who wrote <hi rend="i"
                                >Washington Wife</hi>, it was one of the ten best sellers. It was a
                            gossipy, mean, smart, funny book and he called his wife over and threw
                            back his head, laughed and said, "God, that was a swell book." The next
                            day, he was murdered. That was an anti-Ralph Yarborough maneuver
                            partially, I think. I don't think that Kennedy realized it was, but the
                            Johnson-Connally people were doing Yarborough in.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, how, specifically, do you speculate they were trying to do him
                        in?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, I was the only Yarborough man and whoever heard of not letting a
                            state Democratic committeeman in to meet the president and head of your
                            party?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>In other words, they were just trying to isolate the state liberals from
                            the president?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, the liberals in general and the Yarborough people in particular. I
                            think that Ralph is telling the truth about that. He is paranoid as
                            hell, but he is entitled to be. I don't think that there is any question
                            that there was extreme tension during that whole thing. Ralph was
                            calling me three or four times a night, calling Woodrow Seals, who is a
                            federal district judge now, all day long. Woodrow is the one that
                            earlier lined up that meeting with Kennedy and all the preachers in
                            Houston and that was . . . .</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>In the campaign?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, that was further back. Anyway, he was calling<pb id="p35" n="35"/>
                            Woodrow Seals and he was calling all his people. He was desperate, he
                            was a wild man about it. I imagine that some of it was exaggerated, but
                            not a hell of a lot.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>What was it, they weren't letting him ride in the same car . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>In the same car with the president and they were pushing Connally and
                            putting him Yarborough off to the side.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Was Johnson seen as partisan in this, to Connally?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I think so, yes. Yes. I can't prove it, but I believe that it was. I know
                            San Antonio politics and I know that the Connally people were running
                            the airport rally for Jack Kennedy. They were all over the place and the
                            Yarborough people were kept off the premises.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Who were some of the Connally people in San Antonio that were involved in
                            that?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, John Peace, who was later on the Board of Regents and is dead now,
                            and there was George Brown's daughter out of Houston, I forget her
                            married name . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Mrs. Negley?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, Nancy Negley. A smart, good-looking gal. And then there was . . .
                        </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Is she a force in San Antonio politics, she and her husband?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>They are separated right now, but . . . she was when she was with John
                            Connally, but I think that she has become more of an artsy-craftsy type
                            now.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Junior League?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p36" n="36"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Junior League, artsy-craftsy and has done some pretty good stuff on
                            sustaining the arts here. She's all right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How old is she, in her forties?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, she's in her forties. A good-looking gal. She was offered a
                            Hollywood contract at one time. Nobody knows that, it is hardly
                        known.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How about the Yarborough campaigns? Have you been involved in the
                            Yarborough effort over the years in his bids for . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I was in all of his campaigns except when Jim Hart, the chancellor of the
                            university, ran and I was for Jim Hart in that campaign.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Which campaign was that, what year?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>He ran for the senate and I forget. It was the time when Ralph got
                            elected to the senate for the first time. I had gone to Ralph and said,
                            "Are you going to run for the senate?" He said, "No, I'm going to run
                            for governor." I said, "Well, I'm going to be for Jim Hart." He said,
                            "That's fine." The next week, he announced for the senate. So, I just
                            said, "Hell, I can't quit Chancellor Hart." Jim got no votes at all, but
                            I was in nearly all of Yarborough's campaigns. He would stay at my house
                            at night and we would give him a bed, he was so poor. He was campaigning
                            then like Fred Harris is campaigning now. We would give him a free bed
                            and the next morning, I would give him five dollars to get gas money to
                            get his car from San Antonio to Austin. That's how desperately poor he
                            was.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Wasn't that true in just about every campaign he ran in?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yeah, you know . . . once he got elected, he began to get money, labor
                            money and other stuff. But it was generally true in all of his campaigns
                            and he still owes a lot of money.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p37" n="37"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, I get a letter from him about every six months asking for a little
                            more.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Right. He's gotten down pretty far but he is still in trouble
                            financially.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>What sort of support did Yarborough have in San Antonio through the
                            years? Has this been a stronghold of Yarborough support?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Off and on. It depends on how that Civil Service crowd goes. I think that
                            his strength was San Antonio and east Texas and then Bentsen began to do
                            the job on him on the question of race and I think to a great extent
                            that did him in.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="8007" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="01:14:47"/>
                    <milestone n="7828" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="01:14:48"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Let me ask you a couple of questions about the the Chicano vote in San
                            Antonio. I did a study of the black vote in Houston awhile back and the
                            conclusion I reached there was that although there are various
                            organizations and I guess one central black organization, that kind of
                            helped with voter education and screening candidates and so forth, there
                            is not any organization that can really get the black electorate in
                            Houston to vote for a conservative candidate. I mean, there is certainly
                            some organizational work that goes into getting the black vote out and
                            getting them to vote for blacks or liberals, but it would be very
                            difficult to get the black vote in Houston to go for say, John Connally,
                            even if all of the leaders came out for him. What about the Chicanos in
                            San Antonio? Can you say the same thing for them or are there machines
                            of one sort or another who can pretty much engineer the Chicano bloc to
                            vote for a liberal one time and a conservative the next?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>They are pretty good about voting for the liberals. That's how I got
                            elected to the legislature, because I would carry the<pb id="p38" n="38"
                            /> West Side eight, nine, ten to one. On the whole, they were all right.
                            The only question that I would have about them of an adverse nature, and
                            it is true about Anglos and blacks and everybody, would be the civil
                            service jobs of the people working for the Pentagon, the impact that the
                            war-making processes have on our economy. They might have to be more
                            conformist because of that, but so is everyone else.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>So really, the situation here in San Antonio is kind of like the
                            situation in Senator Henry Jackson's state in Washington, where issues
                            that effect Boeing are really going to be crucial up there and it . . .
                        </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. Organized labor here in San Antonio is very conservative on
                            war-making issues. I remember that I had represented a certain local
                            here in San Antonio for fifteen years and I began to represent
                            conscientious objectors and they came in to see me and said, "We are not
                            going to let a lawyer who represents yellow-bellies represent our
                            union." I said, "Well, look, I've been with you guys for fifteen years.
                            I've kept you out of trouble and ya'll have been good to me, I've made a
                            little monthly retainer out of you. What the hell do you care if I
                            represent yellow-bellies or not? It's your social and economic strata
                            that is being murdered, not the people from Alamo Heights and Terrell
                            Hills." They said, "Well, you are supposed to fight for your country and
                            we don't want a lawyer for yellow-bellies." So, I lost that account and
                            by God, that Pentagon just seeps into everything around here.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>How strong is the labor movement in San Antonio? Is it a force to be
                            reckoned with in politics?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>It's not strong for two reasons. One, it's too<pb id="p39" n="39"/>
                            conservative and for another reason, and it's a bad reason, they can
                            bring up wetback Mexicans any time and break a strike when they want to.
                            There can't be any labor here like Houston where you've got some
                            discipline in the ranks of labor, because they can go down and get some
                            poor starving Mexican below the Rio Grande and bring him up. I have been
                            gravitating to the Quakers in the last few years of my life and . . .
                            this may be getting off the point, but the Quaker position is opposed to
                            the farmworkers and to organized labor, that those people in Mexico are
                            human beings too, and that the artifical boundary line of the Rio Grande
                            doesn't mean that they get any less hungry than anyone else. While that
                            may hurt people up here, those people down there have to eat, too. It is
                            an interesting, irrelevant point that I just made. It interested me that
                            they would take that position.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7828" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="01:19:09"/>
                    <milestone n="8008" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="01:19:10"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>I remember having somewhat those same ambivalent feelings when I worked
                            for the <hi rend="i">Texas Observer</hi> and went out to El Paso to look
                            at some of the problems the labor unions were having there and of
                            course, the labor leaders were very irate about the ease with which the
                            wetbacks could come across and act as scabs. But when you saw those very
                            poor people coming over and getting a job, you had mixed feelings.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>When did you work for the <hi rend="i">Observer?</hi></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, I worked very briefly for it back in 1962, shortly before Willie
                            Morris left and then a very short time after Ronnie Dugger took over,
                            just a few months, actually. Willie had actually gotten me to come back
                            from France, where I was at the time, because he wanted me to take over
                            the <hi rend="i">Observer</hi> and Ronnie didn't want that. Willie
                            hadn't known that Ronnie was going to come back in and be editor at that
                            point.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p40" n="40"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you and Ronnie get along all right? So-so?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>We're very good friends right now. We've been on the outs lots of times,
                            but basically, I think that we are good, long-time friends. One more
                            question about the wetbacks. What percentage, if you can make any kind
                            of guess like this, what percentage of the Chicano population here in
                            San Antonio would you estimate to be composed of illegal aliens?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I don't know how to answer that. You talk to Ernie Cortez about that and
                            they would tell you. I don't know how to answer it. There's something
                            strange that's happened to me, in the last twenty years, I've gotten
                            closer to the black movement and further away from the brown movement. I
                            don't know why and I have no understanding of why that has happened to
                            me. It absolutely astonishes me that that has happened, but it has. I
                            used to know all about the brown movement. I ran with Gus Garcia, now
                            Judge Carlos Cardena, perhaps the finest Mexican American intellectual
                            in Texas. He is worthy of sitting on the Supreme Court right now, he'd
                            be another Brandeis. I knew a lot about it in the old days, but I don't
                            know anything about it anymore.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, tell me a little bit about the black population in San Antonio.
                            That's a rather small one compared to the Chicanos, isn't it?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. And they are all working for the Pentagon, too, but like blacks
                            everywhere in the South, they are damn well organized and they know what
                            they are doing and they've got a black representative from here, a
                            better fellow than that liberal <hi rend="i">Texas Monthly</hi> magazine
                            gives him credit for being. He is a lot better fellow.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p41" n="41"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>This is Sutton that you are talking about?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yeah, G. J. Sutton, which may probably be the most interesting black
                            family in Texas and it's worth telling one of your students, if you've
                            got one from San Antonio, to do a story on that family. One of them was
                            a scientist in the Soviet Union and designed a hemp rope of some kind
                            that was of great use to the Russians. He speaks Russian fluently. One
                            of the girls was a medical doctor, one of the first black women to be a
                            doctor in America. One of them is Percy Sutton, the president of the
                            borough of Manhattan and may be the first black mayor of New York City.
                            He was raised on a farm and he was up making a speech in upstate New
                            York to a bunch of farmers and they said, "This Harlem black, what's he
                            going to know about agriculture?" Well, he got up and talked about crows
                            and insects and locusts and boll weevils and they never had heard
                            anything like that in their lives. He was raised on a farm. The reason
                            that he is borough president of New York, Manhattan, today is that after
                            World War II he applied to go to Texas A&amp;M's veterinary medicine
                            school, he loved animals, and they wouldn't let him in. They said that
                            he had to go to the black school. He said, "I'm not going to go to any
                            black school." For that reason, he went to New York and I tell Percy
                            that Texas lost a good horse doctor.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Texas has supplied quite a few important black leaders around the
                            country.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. Bradley in Los Angeles and some others, but that is the reason that
                            Percy is in New York. He would be a doctor on the East Side of San
                            Antonio today if it hadn't been for that. Some of the other Sutton girls
                            . . . one of them is a college professor today and two<pb id="p42"
                                n="42"/> others are high school teachers in the Berkeley area or San
                            Francisco area. If there are ever any San Antonio kids that want to do a
                            paper that is worthwhile, that would be a swell project.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>They are a very interesting family.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Very astonishingly interesting. Sutton tells that . . . his mother, I
                            knew her and she was as white looking as mine. The people on his
                            mother's side are from New Orleans and all those New Orleans relatives
                            are white and those from Virginia are all black and G. J. told me one
                            time that he was . . . . what was the name of the famous boat that
                            brought the original settlers over from England and people are so proud
                            to be descended from them?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>The Mayflower?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. G. J. said that he was a lot more proud of his ancestors that came
                            over on the slave ships than he is of the ones who came over on the
                            Mayflower. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>There was a black machine in San Antonio back during the . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Bellinger. His son is alive today and very conservative. My father was a
                            contemporary of his and got into trouble. All the blacks were backing
                            him and he got tired of the machine. The machine was really delivering
                            the black vote against him and he was fighting like hell as a liberal
                            all the time and he lost his temper one time and called Valmo Bellinger
                            a black baboon and immediately the bottom just fell out of everything.
                            He got in trouble on that and he lost the East Side. It taught him a
                            lesson. It was a very powerful family and old man Bellinger was a
                            gambler and he ran the numbers racket here in town. Another son is a
                            lawyer here in town and a pretty good guy, Harry Bellinger.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p43" n="43"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>When did the machine break down?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>When the old man died.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>And what was the source of his power? Gambling?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>Gambling, the numbers and he would deliver votes, you know. He would
                            deliver ten or fifteen pretty big precincts and so the police let him
                            operate. The Suttons and the Bellingers were always in different camps.
                            Socially, they were friends, but they were politically in different
                            camps.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="8008" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="01:27:02"/>
                    <milestone n="7829" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="01:27:03"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, let me ask you, to wrap this up, Maury, a very general sort of
                            question like they ask people on television talk shows. You've been
                            involved in liberal politics back since your dad's time in the 1930s and
                            1940s, and so you have a rather long-term perspective from which to judge
                            the progress, or the lack of it, that liberalism has made in Texas. What
                            progress has it made? Is it a more viable organization than it was
                            thirty years ago? Has it accomplished much?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I think that it has accomplished a lot, but I think that one of the great
                            defects in it has been that younger people haven't come along.
                            Everything went into Ralph Yarborough's campaigns, just Ralph, Ralph,
                            Ralph. I was a part of that and would be again. Now Ralph Yarborough is
                            an old man and I don't know any young people or middle-aged people
                            coming along in Texas today, with the possible exception of Bob
                            Eckhardt, and he is getting to be an old man himself. I don't know any
                            young people that would . . . I think that state of liberalism in Texas
                            is very bad. I don't know any young people at all. Also, there is the
                            structured thing of having blacks electing blacks and browns electing
                            browns. I don't know what is going to happen. I don't see any young,
                            snappy, swell young liberals with broad statewide<pb id="p44" n="44"/>
                            appeal today. In that sense, I think that we are worse off than we
                        were.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>The labor movement doesn't seem to have produced any young leaders
                            either, does it?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>No. I don't know much about it. The labor movement backed me for the
                            United States Senate. I think they are sorry that they did . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7829" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="01:29:08"/>
                    <milestone n="8009" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="01:29:09"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Who is that, Hank Brown who was leader of the . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>No, Jerry Holleman. The last great CIO labor leader in this state was
                            Fred Schmidt. Hank Brown is a friend of mine, but Fred Schmidt was a
                            sort of Adlai Stevenson of the labor movement. He was an old CIO
                            intellectual radical and later became a professor at the University of
                            California at Los Angeles. He had a heart attack and has retired now and
                            living, I think, in Tehachapi, California. He worked with me and Jerry
                            Holleman worked with me and then later on, Hank Brown worked with me. As
                            you indicated earlier, Henry and I cut each other up so much that it was
                            impossible. Now, if I had gotten all of Henry's votes, I think that I .
                            . . assuming that I had gotten all of them, I think that I would have
                            been number two against Bill Blakley and there, but for the grace of
                            God, went a senate seat.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CHANDLER DAVIDSON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, it has been a very enjoyable morning and I appreciate it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MAURY MAVERICK:</speaker>
                        <p>I enjoyed talking to you.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>END OF INTERVIEW</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                    <milestone n="8009" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="01:30:35"/>
                    <p>
                        <note id="n1" target="ref1">1. Barnhart denies he was hounded out of
                            Beeville. </note>
                    </p>
                </div2>
            </div1>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI.2>
