ERA necessary to guarantee legal equality
McKay explains that the the Equal Rights Amendment was crucial in terms of providing women with equal protection before the law. It was this legal equality and the responsibilities of citizenship that it entailed, rather than its symbolic worth, that made it so important, argues McKay. She then goes on to offer some generalizations about both pro- and anti-ERA women.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Martha C. McKay, March 29, 1974. Interview A-0324. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- BELINDA RIGGSBEE:
-
Do you think there is a real need for a constitutional
amendment like the ERA? Is it needed as a symbol of victory for the
women's movement?
- MARTHA C. McKAY:
-
I'm not much for symbols. It's needed because the constitution of the
United States is not applied to women, who remain special categories of
persons under the fourteenth amendment. I don't care about the symbols,
I want equality under the law.
- BELINDA RIGGSBEE:
-
The last question. What kind of support or involvement came from the
following: college campuses, black women, men other than
legislators?
- MARTHA C. McKAY:
-
One thing that we could have done that we didn't do, and we really did
have some men working for us, was to do what I think they've done in
Florida now. They have a whole men's committee for ERA chaired by some
man that is well known. And we should have done that. We had support
from men and such as the Asheville paper with their good editorial and
as I said, some Congressmen and certainly some of the men legislators
were awfully good in working for it. Helpful. But we should have asked
some men to form a committee, that would have been very helpful, I
think. And we just didn't . . . well, as I told you, we were lying low
and then, we just didn't have much time. College campuses . . . no, not
much. Obviously, there are political activists on campuses, women and
men. But the ones who are politically active are the ones whose families
have been in the political system, or who have got interested in some
way, and they always help. There was the daughter of a legislator at
Greensboro who was helpful and there were
certainly people. But in terms of a group as a whole, I don't think
there was any concerted effort. We really didn't have time to go and
organize and have rallies, although we certainly put out the word. We
made requests in various ways, where you would write home, or when you
go home, see your legislator on the weekend and write your legislator
and say where you are from. And I think some people did that, some
students. But in terms of any identifible formal effort that they
organized, no.
- BELINDA RIGGSBEE:
-
And black women?
- MARTHA C. McKAY:
-
We had the Caucus women, who were part of the telephone network. Alfreda
Webb was working for us, Elizabeth Cofield
* was trying to help us in Raleigh . . .
* Member, Wake County Board of Commissioners and Charter member
of the North Carolina Women's Political Caucus.
[END OF TAPE 2, SIDE B]
[TAPE 2, SIDE B]
[START OF TAPE 3, SIDE A]
- BELINDA RIGGSBEE:
-
Would you, you may not want to, describe the typical pro-ERA woman, in
terms of socio-economic level, marital status, children, educational
level, job status, could you?
- MARTHA C. McKAY:
-
I think it's a mixture. You know, most of the women are middle class,
because they are the people who have either the money or the freedom
plus having had the background in terms of being educated on the issue
and so forth, to get into it. We had people all the way from
grandmothers to teen-agers who were for it.
- BELINDA RIGGSBEE:
-
Well, what about the anti-woman?
- MARTHA C. McKAY:
-
I really don't . . . I don't know this woman from Reidsville.
- BELINDA RIGGSBEE:
-
Dorothy Slade.
- MARTHA C. McKAY:
-
Yeah, I don't know her. I just know that she's a Birch Society woman. I
think that probably the people who are fundamentalist in terms of
religion would compose aflarge part of the people who were against it, I
mean, you know, about the whole thing that a woman's place is in the
home and a woman is subject to her husband and all the stuff like that.
And of course, I think that there were some whose fears were aroused by
the women who were working against it. I think that they had a fear that
they might indeed lose some privileges, not knowing that you really
don't have any. But the only legitimate one, you can say, is the
draft.
- BELINDA RIGGSBEE:
-
Were any of the pro-ERA women ever . . . was this a conscious fear with
them at all? Did any of them every candidly admit that "well,
gee, we might be drafted." Was this ever a question?
- MARTHA C. McKAY:
-
No, never. They say, "Well, we'll take that. That's part of it.
We want the duties as well as the responsibilities of
citizenship."