Growing black radicalism in the mid-1960s
LeMaistre remembers the growing black radicalism of the mid-1960s, from a black minister, T.Y. Rogers, who used inflammatory language, to Stillman College students who burned a building on their campus. Most of their anger was directed against the Vietnam War, LeMaistre remembers.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with George A. LeMaistre, April 29, 1985. Interview A-0358. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
It was later in 1963 when the Reverend T. Y. Rogers became pastor there,
and the Tuscaloosa Community Action Committee . . . Apparently that was
closely related to Martin Luther King and the . . .
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
The Community Action Committee was made up pretty much of black
preachers. There were some few white people who sympathized with them
and met with them on occasion and a handful of black leaders who worked
in various businesses; one or two had their own business. And they were
taking a real risk in coming out front and demanding that something be
done to correct the mistakes of the past, because what that meant was
that their businesses were pinpointed by Ku Klux and people of that
sort. I don't think there was any instance of a boycott or anything like
that because most of the black businesses had only black customers.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
The account that I read indicated that it was mostly a march from the
Church to the courthouse. One of their targets was the segregated
facilities in the courthouse. Ironical that the clash, where there was
some violence there at the church, was less than a month before the
Civil Rights Act went into effect.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
T. Y. Rogers was a smart man. He had worked with Martin Luther King. He
was not any important cog in King's machine. He had certainly been
attached to it and was under the direction of Martin Luther King in some
ways, but he was much more given to strident language than King was.
Rogers was younger, and I don't recall his ever making an open threat.
But he made several speeches in which it seemed that he was simply
trying to inflame his black brethren against the whites. I remember on
Brotherhood Sunday the following year, which was some day in
February—I don't remember what date it was—I made
a talk in the First African Baptist Church on
"brotherhood," and Rogers preceded it by going back to
the times telling about the discrimination against his mother and how
she had been forced to work for white women taking care of their babies
and that sort of thing, and really made it a little uncomfortable for me
to talk to this group of people who were my friends, most of
them—people who I knew downtown. And ignore what he had to
say, because you couldn't talk about brotherhood when you talked about
how badly somebody treated your mother. I don't think it was malicious;
I just think that was the way he was leaning, and he felt that way.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
Were the students at Stillman involved in this?
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
The students at Stillman were not involved in the situation with George
Wallace. The students at Stillman became very much involved in the
following summer. They burned a small building out there; Stokeley
Carmichael spoke out there on the campus; Rap
Brown spoke out there on the campus. There were a number of instances
where students, in sort of a competition among themselves, were trying
to show "We're tougher than you are" on the civil
rights thing. And it got pretty much out of hand; we actually had to
expel a couple of them. I was on the Board at Stillman, and we had a
couple of instances where they left the campus to conduct some . . .
what amounted to raids in the downtown white community. That was
strictly against the rules, and they had no privilege that allowed them
to do that. We also had a sizeable loss when they burned the little
building. The building was not of great worth itself, about a ten
thousand dollar building. It was not a school building. It was a
building in which we had accumulated all the cards and pledges and
information for a financial drive. It was all destroyed, and the work
that had been done for a year or so by the College to try to raise funds
was simply destroyed by the students that night. Obviously they didn't
intend to do that; they didn't know what was in the building. But I
would say that the school itself suffered a great deal more than the
community did by the burning of that . . . At the same time, almost
within two weeks of that, there was a building burned on the Alabama
campus—an old gymnasium near where the Student Recreation
Center is now. It was not being used for anything; as a matter of fact,
it wasn't built for a gymnasium. It was more like a warehouse or a
garage, but somebody had put a couple of basketball
backboards up, and marked a track or something of that sort . . .
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
All of this was a part of the "rebellious sixties."
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Yeah. This was largely directed against the Viet Nam war. This had to do
more with recruiting on the campus. Army recruiters or Navy recruiters
would come through trying to sign the students up for the military.
That's when this kind of thing took place. It did not relate to what
George Wallace was fussing about when he came over here. But it was just
a continuation of a rebellious spirit that was pretty much stirred up
when Wallace came and never really died down.