<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite_sohp_ms.dtd">
<TEI.2>
    <teiHeader type="Southern Oral History Project" status="new">
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title type="main">
                    <hi rend="bold">Oral History Interview with Marion Wright, March 8, 1978.
                        Interview B-0034. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007):</hi>
                    Electronic Edition. </title>
                <title type="descriptive">A Measured Push for Justice in the Pre-<hi rend="i">Brown</hi>South</title>
                <author>
                    <name id="wm" reg="Wright, Marion" type="interviewee">Wright, Marion</name>,
                    interviewee </author>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Interview conducted by </resp>
                    <name id="hj" reg="Hall, Jacquelyn" type="interviewer">Hall, Jacquelyn</name>
                </respStmt>
                <funder>Funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services supported the
                    electronic publication of this interview.</funder>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
                    <name id="mm">Mike Millner</name>
                </respStmt>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Sound recordings digitized by </resp>
                    <name id="as">Aaron Smithers</name>
                    <name id="sfc">Southern Folklife Collection</name>
                </respStmt>
            </titleStmt>
            <editionStmt>
                <edition>First edition, <date>2007</date>
                </edition>
            </editionStmt>
            <extent>159 Kb</extent>
            <publicationStmt>
                <publisher>The University Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill </publisher>
                <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace>
                <date>2007.</date>
                <availability status="unknown">
                    <p>© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina at
                        Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching and
                        personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the
                        text.</p>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <biblFull id="recording">
                    <recording type="audio" dur="01:43:13">
                        <p>MP3 file derived from WAV preservation master, which was derived from
                            original analog cassettes.</p>
                    </recording>
                    <titleStmt>
                        <title type="recording">Oral History Interview with Marion Wright, March 8,
                            1978. Interview B-0034. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007)</title>
                        <title type="series">Series B. Individual Biographies. Southern Oral History
                            Program Collection (B-0034)</title>
                        <author>Jacquelyn Hall</author>
                    </titleStmt>
                    <extent>189 Mb</extent>
                    <publicationStmt>
                        <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, N. C.</pubPlace>
                        <publisher>Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina at
                            Chapel Hill</publisher>
                        <date>8 March 1978</date>
                        <authority/>
                    </publicationStmt>
                </biblFull>
                <biblFull>
                    <titleStmt>
                        <title type="transcript">Oral History Interview with Marion Wright, March 8,
                            1978. Interview B-0034. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007)</title>
                        <title type="series">Series B. Individual Biographies. Southern Oral History
                            Program Collection (B-0034)</title>
                        <author>Marion Wright</author>
                    </titleStmt>
                    <extent>47 p.</extent>
                    <publicationStmt>
                        <publisher>Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina at
                            Chapel Hill</publisher>
                        <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace>
                        <date>8 March 1978</date>
                        <authority/>
                    </publicationStmt>
                    <notesStmt>
                        <note anchored="no">Interview conducted on March 8, 1978, by Jacquelyn Hall;
                            recorded in Linville Falls, North Carolina.</note>
                        <note anchored="no"> Transcribed by Jean Houston.</note>
                        <note anchored="no"> Forms part of: Southern Oral History Program Collection
                            (#4007): Series B. Individual Biographies, Manuscripts Department,
                            University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</note>
                        <note anchored="no">Original transcript on deposit at the Southern
                            Historical Collection, The Wilson Library, University of North Carolina
                            at Chapel Hill.</note>
                    </notesStmt>
                </biblFull>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <projectDesc>
                <p>The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-Chapel Hill digital library, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South.</hi>
                </p>
            </projectDesc>
            <editorialDecl>
                <p>An audio file with the interview complements this electronic edition.</p>
                <p>The text has been entered using double-keying and verified against the original.</p>
                <p>The text has been encoded using the recommendations for Level 4 of the TEI in
                    Libraries Guidelines.</p>
                <p>Original grammar and spelling have been preserved. </p>
                <p>All quotation marks, em dashes and ampersand have been transcribed as entity
                    references.</p>
                <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as "</p>
                <p>All em dashes are encoded as —</p>
            </editorialDecl>
            <classDecl>
                <taxonomy id="lcsh">
                    <bibl>
                        <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings</title>
                    </bibl>
                </taxonomy>
                <taxonomy id="docsouth">
                    <bibl>
                        <title>Documenting the American South Topics</title>
                    </bibl>
                </taxonomy>
            </classDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
        <profileDesc>
            <langUsage>
                <language id="eng">English</language>
            </langUsage>
            <textClass>
                <keywords scheme="lcsh">
                    <list type="simple">
                        <item>
                            <!-- LC headings go here -->
                        </item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                <keywords scheme="docsouth">
                    <list type="main_topic">
                        <item>20th Century &amp; Race Relations<list type="sub-topic">
                                <item>Activism</item>
                            </list>
                        </item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
            </textClass>
        </profileDesc>
        <revisionDesc>
            <change>
                <date>2007-00-00, </date>
                <respStmt>
                    <name>Celine Noel, Wanda Gunther, and Kristin Martin</name>
                    <resp/>
                </respStmt>
                <item> revised TEIHeader and created catalog record for the electronic
                edition.</item>
            </change>
            <change>
                <date>2007-01-06, </date>
                <respStmt>
                    <name> Mike Millner </name>
                    <resp/>
                </respStmt>
                <item>finished TEI-conformant encoding and final proofing.</item>
            </change>
        </revisionDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text id="ohs_B-0034">
        <front>
            <div1 type="about_interview">
                <head>Interview with Marion Wright, March 8, 1978. Interview B-0034.</head>
                <byline>Conducted by Jacquelyn Hall</byline>
                <note type="deposit" anchored="no">
                    <p>Transcript on deposit at The Southern Historical Collection, The Louis Round
                        Wilson Library</p>
                </note>
                <note type="citation" anchored="no">
                    <p>Citation of this interview should be as follows: <lb/>“Interview
                        B-0034, in the Southern Oral History Program Collection #4007, <lb/>Southern
                        Historical Collection, The Wilson Library, <lb/>University of North Carolina
                        at Chapel Hill”</p>
                </note>
                <note type="copyright" anchored="no">Copyright © 2007 The University of
                    North Carolina</note>
            </div1>
            <div1 type="abstract">
                <head>Abstract</head>
                <p>Marion Wright describes his beliefs about racial justice and his membership in
                    the Southern Regional Council (SRC). Wright was one of a group of white
                    southerners who sought to tackle the entrenched racism of the 20th-century
                    South. As a member of the SRC, Wright sought to end legal segregation, although
                    he and other members were sensitive to pushing for too much change too quickly.
                    The group also stayed off the streets as protest mounted, seeking to maintain
                    its authority as well as its tax exempt status. As the civil rights movement
                    reached new beginnings in the 1950s and 1960s, the SRC faded. This interview is
                    a portrait of a civil rights leader in the era before the movement was defined
                    by direct action.</p>
            </div1>
            <div1 type="short_abstract">
                <head>Short Abstract</head>
                <p>Marion Wright was one of a group of white southerners who sought to tackle the
                    entrenched racism of the 20th-century South. As a member of the Southern
                    Regional Council (SRC), he sought to do so without direct action. This interview
                    is a portrait of a civil rights leader in the era before the movement was
                    defined by public protest</p>
            </div1>
        </front>
        <body>
            <div1 id="B-0034" type="sohp_interview">
                <head>Interview with Marion Wright, March 8, 1978. <lb/>Interview B-0034. Southern
                    Oral History Program Collection (#4007)</head>
                <list type="simple">
                    <head>Interview Participants</head>
                    <item>
                        <name id="spk1" key="mw" reg="Wright, Marion" type="interviewee">MARION
                            WRIGHT</name>, interviewee</item>
                    <item>
                        <name id="spk2" key="jh" reg="Hall, Jacquelyn" type="interviewer">JACQUELYN
                            HALL</name>, interviewer</item>
                </list>
                <div2 id="tape1-a" n="1-A" type="tape_side">
                    <pb id="p1" n="1"/>
                    <head>[TAPE 1, SIDE A]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 1, SIDE A]</p>
                    </note>
                    <milestone n="4544" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:00:00"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>In the speech you made to the Southern Regional Council in 1974, you
                            started out by saying that you saw yourself as an oral historian. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> Do you remember that?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I guess I did say that.</p>
                        <p>I felt I was old man of the tribe, telling legends.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>To some extent, that's what I want to just go on and extend today. But I
                            would like to start back a little bit and fill in just a couple of gaps,
                            some questions that I had from reading Shankman's interviews with you.
                            One question that I had was about your family background. You said that
                            your parents died when you were quite young.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you know anything about your grandparents or any of your earlier
                            ancestors?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I know very little. I know the name of my grandfather on my father's
                            side, and I know my mother's father was a Watson, and I don't know what
                            his first name was. They all lived in the same community, either
                            Edgefield or Soluda Counties. I thought that my parents having died so
                            young, all that information did not seem important to anybody else.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>What were your father and mother's names?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>My father was Preston Lafayette Wright. He was probably<pb id="p2" n="2"/> named for the general. My father was in the Confederate Army himself,
                            and his father would have gone back to Lafayette's day. My mother's name
                            was Octavia Watson Wright.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>What did your father do for a living?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>He was a merchant and had a farm or two, and established the first little
                            small bank in Johnston, South Carolina. It probably had a capital of not
                            more than ?25,000, a very small bank.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Did your family own slaves at all?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I'm sure they would have, because we were in a slave-owning settlement.
                            That is, that county produced cotton and things that slaves would have
                            produced. I knew one slave myself, so I'm sure that my family would have
                            owned them. They had no scruples against it, I'm sure.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>You said that your mother went to a girls' school?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, in Georgia, and I have the impression it was a place called
                            Milledgeville. It's been a long, long time ago.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you know anything else about your mother's educational experience?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>There was one little thing I'm anxious to tell, because I had not found
                            out about it until recently. I just know that she went to this college
                            and became a very staunch advocate of education. She drove around in a
                            horse and buggy and urged several girls to go to college. That is, she
                            urged their parents to send their daughters. And she taught all black
                            cooks and other people who were around the place. She'd set aside a time
                            to teach them. I suspect it was against the law at that time; you know,
                            it was at one time against the law to teach Negroes.<pb id="p3" n="3"/>
                            I guess that passed out with the Emancipation Proclamation. It probably
                            wouldn't have been against the law. But there is a fact <gap reason="unknown"/> I did not know until I talked with my
                            ninety-two-year-old sister recently, Her mind is quite clear. I have a
                            brother named Preston Lambuth Wright. Lambuth was a missionary of the
                            Methodist Church, a man quite active in church affairs. And my mother
                            was apparently a very pious woman. She was one of the founders of the
                            Methodist Church at Johnston. I attended the hundredth anniversary
                            recently. The thing that my sister told me: my middle name is Allen, and
                            I had often wondered where I got that name. She told me, by George, that
                            I was named for a black bishop named Allen who founded the
                            Afro-Methodist Episcopal Church. <note type="comment"> [Laughter]
                            </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Amazing.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>And for whom Allen University at Columbia is named. But my mother admired
                            him, and I think particularly admired the fact that he struck out and
                            organized his own church, you might say. <note type="comment">
                                [Laughter] </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>That's very interesting.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Isn't it? It's a fascinating thing. And I think if anything would
                            probably show her very liberal attitude, naming a white child for a
                            Negro minister would have taken some courage, I should think, or at
                            least an unorthodox approach to the matter.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>How did you know about her special interest in education as you were
                            growing up, from your sister?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Sisters, yes. I was one of seven children who survived our mother, and I
                            was the baby. So my sisters, who were maybe fifteen or twenty years old
                            when she died, lived in the house and knew the setup so far as the
                                cooks<pb id="p4" n="4"/> and servants were concerned.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>And had they gone to college, the elder sisters?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>They did, yes. I had three of them that went to Columbia College. That's
                            the Methodist institution in Columbia.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Was she especially interested in education for girls, or just generally
                            interested in public education?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>My feeling would probably be, general education. The fact that she taught
                            Negroes indiscriminately, I think, meant general education. But it was
                            probably natural that she would have more opportunity to influence a
                            girl than she would a boy.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I came across a reference somewhere to a student revolt at the University
                            of South Carolina?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p><note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> In which you were a
                        ringleader?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I thought I was universally condemned by the faculty, and a movement was
                            afoot to expel me. And I was backed by two strong friends on the Board
                            of Trustees. I thought that everybody disapproved. Some years later, at
                            an alumni meeting, I sat next to Professor Patterson Wardlaw, who has
                            been one of my idols all of my life. After dinner he said (I was now,
                            we'll say, thirty years old, and he was seventy-five), "I never
                            did tell you, Mr. Wright, I warmly approved of your advocacy of<pb id="p5" n="5"/> firing Dr. [William S.] Currell, and if I had been a
                            student I would have signed the same petitions that you
                        wrote."</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Tell me what the issues were. This would have been in when?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>About 1917 or '18. I was a law student at the time. There was actually no
                            crisis precipitated by Dr. Currell, and he had the misfortune of having
                            succeeded Dr. S.C. Mitchell, who was a very dynamic man who built up the
                            University. It probably had its greatest prestige during his day. He was
                            succeeded by Dr. Currell, who would have been an excellent English
                            teacher, but completely lacking in magnetism. And during his
                            administration the University declined in student body and so on. So it
                            was as an effort to restore something of the lost grandeur from Dr.
                            Mitchell's administration that we young people said, "Let's get
                            us a new man." <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>So you passed around a petition . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>We adopted a resolution, and we had a student body meeting. It was all
                            openly done, and probably pretty daringly done, because we met in the
                            chapel and had this resolution read, and it was adopted, and then people
                            came up and signed it, so we could share guilt equally, like the
                            Declaration of Independence: "We hang together, or we hang
                            separately."</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>But it caused a lot of negative reaction?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. The press condemned us soundly, as you can imagine they would. The
                            press would be more tolerant of that kind of thing now; students are
                            always staging rebellions. But at that time, it was a very rare
                            occurrence. We always doffed our hats to professors when we passed<pb id="p6" n="6"/> on the campus, that sort of thing. And I applaud
                            that spirit; I wish there were more of it, to tell you the honest truth
                            about it. But Dr. Currell was such a sharp contrast to his predecessor,
                            whom we all worshipped, that it was probably unfair to him that we made
                            the comparison when we did. Certainly nothing improper on his part. It
                            was negative—failure to act—rather than action
                            that moved us.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>How did the incident end?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>He made a speech in chapel a few days later, a very excellent speech, to
                            the effect that he was not quitting under fire and that kind of thing.
                            And he held on for a year or so longer. But I suspect we did give him a
                            mortal thrust, because it's hard for a president to function if the
                            student body has that attitude toward him. I'm not proud of it beyond
                            the fact that Dr. Wardlaw said if he'd been there, he would have done
                            the same thing.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>
                            <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note>
                        </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Anything he would have done, I would have applauded.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I'm still just filling in some little gaps in the earlier interviews. I
                            understood from what you said in that earlier interview that you were
                            involved in a local interracial group in Conway before the regional or
                            state interracial commission was formed?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Not before. It would have been after, and probably inspired by, the
                            regional commission. When I moved to Conway, I know that there was an
                            active organization in South Carolina, very small. I probably got the
                            idea from that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I thought it was interesting if some local groups had spontaneously
                            started before the Interracial Commission, but that makes<pb id="p7" n="7"/> more sense, that it was inspired. <milestone n="4544" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:12:03"/>
                    <milestone n="3974" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:12:04"/>How did you happen
                            to become state President of the Interracial Commission?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>It had existed for a very short while, and I had never attended a
                            meeting. But the President, who was a lawyer named Mr. Beverly Herbert,
                            called me over the phone and wanted to know if I would accept the
                            presidency of the Commission. And I told him without hesitancy that I
                            would. And I was already somewhat known as being a radical on that
                            issue, so he assumed from that fact that I would accept the presidency,
                            which I did.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>And had you gotten that reputation mainly because of your activities as a
                            student in your commencement address?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I made two or three speeches. I think, looking back on it, I did so as
                            much because of the fact that it gave me a certain fame or notoriety or
                            something of that sort. But I was a solid convert. Dr. Josiah Morse, a
                            professor of philosophy who taught me, was a firm believer in the
                            equality of mankind in general, so I did have a fervor that was sincere.
                            Being a college boy at the time and being seventeen or eighteen years
                            old, the glamour of speaking perhaps influenced me somewhat.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I had the impression from what you said before that those years at
                            college were really the decisive turning point, that you seem to have
                            had fairly conventional views toward race and religion and so on until
                            that college experience.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I think that would have been true to a large extent. I saw instances of
                            abuse of blacks which I deeply resented, and to that extent I was in
                            favor of better treatment.<pb id="p8" n="8"/> An incident that I can
                            recall where my indignation was aroused occurred in the store of a man
                            named Walter Wise at Trenton. I was a clerk there before going to
                            college. And on one occasion the train from the north brought in, among
                            other passengers, a black man who was quite well dressed. There was a
                            connecting line between the train from the north, a smaller line which
                            ran from Aiken to Edgefield. So the northerners who were then making
                            Aiken their point for winter hunting and that kind of thing would bring
                            Negro servants with them, so I'm sure this man had come down in that
                            capacity. The Northerners had to bring their polo ponies, also. This
                            black man had to wait to catch the train to Aiken. There was some delay.
                            He came in from Columbia and had to wait for this small shuttle line
                            that went to Aiken. So he came over to the store and said he would like
                            to wash his hands. We kept a basin in the back of the store, and I got
                            him that basin and some soap and a towel. And about the time that he was
                            performing his ablutions, the owner of the store, Mr. Walter Wise, came
                            in, and went berserk, almost. He grabbed a buggy whip. There was a rack
                            of buggy whips for sale, so he grabbed one of those and shouted
                            something about a "goddam nigger using my washpan"
                                <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> and ran the Negro out of
                            the store. I recall distinctly that the man hid behind the Presbyterian
                            Church. Mr. Wise came back and lectured me for a long time about race
                            relations. Finally when the shuttle train came in, going to Aiken, I saw
                            this man creep out and get on that train.</p>
                        <p>This Negro was probably better dressed than any citizen of Trenton, and
                            that probably was one reason for the hostility.<pb id="p9" n="9"/>
                            <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> He had an air about him that
                            perhaps made you feel uncomfortable in the assumption that you were
                            superior. So this happened in my youth.</p>
                        <p>Then as a small boy I hunted and played with Negroes. That was more or
                            less the custom in the South at that time. I played with them without
                            the slightest self-consciousness on the part of any of us until I
                            reached, I presume, the age of puberty, when my sister called me aside
                            and told me that I must stop that kind of thing, that boys of my age
                            didn't run around with colored boys of that age. I know I resented that.</p>
                        <p>So these things merely mean that I had some feeling of resentment at the
                            way Negroes were treated. I daresay not a person in that community ever
                            thought of a Negro as being a citizen; it was always a
                            master-and-servant relationship, and a very comfortable one for the
                            master, as you may imagine.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>It sounds as if you were sort of naturally rebellious, too, in addition
                            to feeling a certain indignation about blacks, that you were a little
                            rebellious toward authority.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I think I was born a rebel. It not only showed itself a little bit later
                            in my attitude toward blacks, but my attitude toward the church, also.
                            As would be customary with practically all children at that time, you
                            went to church and joined during some soul-fermenting revival when they
                            had an evangelist there. So I joined under such circumstances at <gap reason="unknown"/> what was known as a protracted meeting. But I
                            left Trenton at age sixteen.</p>
                        <pb id="p10" n="10"/>
                        <p>The family probably welcomed my going off to college. Then at college I
                            came under the influence of larger personalities than I had met, and a
                            Jewish professor of philosophy who never let his Judaism intrude on his
                            teachings at all. But he fully implanted the idea that what I had
                            theretofore believed, or what people of my circle believed, was fairly
                            primitive. So, in a wrash moment, I wrote the Trenton Methodist Church
                            to take my name off their roll. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note>
                            And I guess they did it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="3974" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:20:57"/>
                    <milestone n="4545" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:20:58"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>How did other students respond to all this? Were there other people in
                            your class at the University of South Carolina at that time who went on
                            to take the kinds of positions that you took?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I should say. I could name numbers of them. A person with whom I was more
                            closely identified was Dr. James McBride Dabbs. He and I were
                            classmates, and he succeeded me as President of the Southern Regional
                            Council and also as President of the South Carolina Council on Human
                            Relations. We were closely associated. Dr. Mitchell and Dr. Morse
                            together had left their stamp on them and others in the student body, a
                            great many.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Moving on to the Southern Regional Council, were you involved in the
                            founding meetings?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I was not. I wish very much I had been. I must have come on at the next
                            meeting, so far as I can determine. I was there during the Guy Johnson
                            regime. Guy Johnson was Executive Director of the Southern Regional
                            Council, the first one. He was brought there by Dr. Howard Odum, who was
                            its first President. So Guy remained Executive Secretary<pb id="p11" n="11"/> not more than two years, and I was there on the occasion
                            when he resigned or left us without a director. So I think I was
                            probably a year late getting in, maybe two years.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4545" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:22:39"/>
                    <milestone n="3975" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:22:40"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Since you had been involved in the Interracial Commission, I wonder how
                            you happened not to be involved in that transition from the Commission
                            to the SRC.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Dr. Odum, speaking for whites, and Dr. Gordon B. Hancock, speaking for
                            blacks, invited a group of people to Atlanta which formed the Southern
                            Regional Council. I assume I was not invited; I certainly did not
                            attend. But I think probably the next year I was there. I was President
                            of the South Carolina Council (it was not then known as Council on Human
                            Relations, but I've forgotten the precise name) when Guy Johnson was
                            Executive Director of the Southern Regional Council. There was no
                            relationship at all between the Southern Regional Council and these
                            little things scattered around over the South. So I prepared a kind of
                            treaty between the South Carolina group and Guy Johnson's group which
                            was approved by both organizations, and that established really an
                            organic connection between the two. It was a very simple kind of thing;
                            it just agreed that our members would pay so much to us, and the rest
                            would go to the Southern Regional Council. There was a division of
                            membership fees. The Council at that time had established a little paper
                            that was called <hi rend="i">Southern Frontier</hi>. So in exchange for
                            our sending in a portion of the fees or dues which we collected, we got
                            subscriptions to the <hi rend="i">Southern Frontier</hi>. And if we
                            wanted to write for information or assistance, we were free to do
                        so.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p12" n="12"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>In the thirties and forties, then, had there been very little
                            relationship between the South Carolina Commission on Interracial
                            Cooperation and the Atlanta office of the Commission on Interracial
                            Cooperation?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>It would have been a very tenuous thing. The Atlanta office probably had
                            two people in its employ, Guy Johnson and a secretary would be my idea,
                            so they were not in a position to render a very large amount of service.
                            And the other little groups could depend on a few local people to keep
                            them going.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="3975" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:25:34"/>
                    <milestone n="4546" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:25:35"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I know in the last days of the Interracial Commission, when the
                            handwriting was pretty much on the wall that it was not going to be able
                            to get any more funding and was going to be dissolved, Jessie Daniel
                            Ames made an effort to travel around and to revitalize the state
                            interracial commissions in the hope of keeping that organization
                        going.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I don't remember that that was Mrs. Ames' mission, though probably it
                            was. But I remember her quite well, and I remember her chiefly on
                            account of her work in the abolition of lynching. You're probably
                            familiar with that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I suspect that she may have had two objectives in mind: first of all, to
                            do away with lynching; in the second place, to provide some basis of
                            support from the local groups to the newly formed Southern Regional
                            Council. I was not aware of that; probably she did.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>So you wouldn't have been involved then or have known too<pb id="p13" n="13"/> much about the early controversy over whether the Southern
                            Regional Council was going to take a stand against segregation?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4546" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:27:05"/>
                    <milestone n="3977" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:27:06"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>You know Lillian Smith's criticism of the Council and the debate that
                            went on back and forth . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Strangely enough, I don't remember Lillian Smith. Everybody else seems to
                            remember Lillian Smith, but I did not. I remember two or three annual
                            meetings when the issue was threshed out. And the movement in support of
                            abolition of segregation gained; every time the issue was brought up, it
                            gained converts. I've never been convinced that it was weakness on the
                            part of the white members that they did not endorse it at once. It seems
                            that way now. But you had practical considerations. You had to keep your
                            own strength, and if we'd acted immediately we would have alienated a
                            great many people.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Did it come up every year as a provocative issue?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I recall something like for two or three years.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>But did it come up virtually every year from, say, '44 to 1951 when the
                            decision was finally made?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>No, I was on the Board for years and years, and I can only recall maybe a
                            couple of meetings when it was debated. Lillian Smith no doubt
                            participated actively. I was more impressed, I think, by certain Negro
                            people who were standing up for their rights. I remember a Dr. Forrester
                            Washington and Dr. Charles S. Johnson from Fisk, who were probably the
                            ablest people present, white or colored. And both of<pb id="p14" n="14"/> them made statements that influenced me more than Mrs. Ames or
                            Lillian Smith would have done, I'm sure.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>And were they pressing the Council to take . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>They were, in no offensive way. They stated their case plainly; they had
                            no doubt where they stood and stated it in such a way that you had to
                            become convinced that they were right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Were there other people that you remember as being spokesmen for that
                            position?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>No, I do not. I remember people who were present, but for the life of me
                            I could not tell you . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>But it was pretty much a black-white division, with the blacks pressing
                            the Council to take a pro-integration stand?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I think that was true, and I think there was always a substantial core of
                            white members who wanted to go along with it. And finally the increased
                            Negro membership and the conversion of whites brought about the final
                            adoption of that resolution. <ref id="ref1" target="n1">1</ref>
                            <milestone n="3977" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:30:55"/>
                            <milestone n="4547" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:30:56"/>
                            <note id="n1" target="ref1">
                                <p>1 According to Harold Fleming, the board member who took the lead
                                    in re-raising the issue was Albert W. Dent, president of Dillard
                                    University. The resolution, adopted in 1951, was entitled,
                                    "The South of the Future." Fleming to
                                    Jacquelyn Hall, June 23, 1978.</p>
                            </note> I remember the resolution itself. It was written by Harold
                            Fleming, I think one of the clearest writers and thinkers that I know.
                            But it was then submitted to the Executive Committee or maybe the full
                            Board of Directors for adoption, and it was edited out of all shape.
                                <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> Everybody had an idea. It
                            was a committee at its worst. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> I
                            recall a rabbi, whom I dearly love, insisted on putting at the end of
                            one sentence something that seemed completely irrelevant, "by
                            the grace of God." <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note>
                            Everybody had a shot at it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Committee writing is the worst of all.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Harold's work did survive, not entirely emasculated but at<pb id="p15" n="15"/> least modified.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>[END OF TAPE 1, SIDE A]</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                </div2>
                <div2 id="tape1-b" n="1-B" type="tape_side">
                    <head>[TAPE 1, SIDE B]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 1, SIDE B]</p>
                    </note>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>In 1951 the Council resolved against segregation?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Probably. I don't recall the year.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I wondered whether there was any connection between your becoming
                            President and the adoption of that resolution at that time.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>No, they did not coincide with each other. I may have been elected at
                            that meeting; I'm not sure about that. But I was not elected because I
                            supported it or opposed it or anything of that sort. In other words, the
                            issue was fought out on its merits, and I think personalities didn't
                            enter into the action. There was no political part of it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4547" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:32:07"/>
                            <milestone n="3978" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:32:08"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Thinking back over your years with the Council and your years of watching
                            the Council in operation, could you make some comparisons between the
                            style and the contributions of the different people who have been
                            Executive Directors of the Council? It seems to me that over the years,
                            from Guy Johnson to George Mitchell to Harold Fleming, Les Dunbar, Paul
                            Anthony, and George Esser, there's a lot of continuity but there's also
                            a lot of difference.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>They were probably about as distinct personalities as you could find.
                            Each had his own special flavor. Guy Johnson, of course, was an
                            academician. He came from Chapel Hill and was a very scholarly, quiet,
                            modest kind of man. He would never have succeeded by oratory to get
                            people to act because of emotion. His was always a purely<pb id="p16" n="16"/> intellectual being and almost a little too pedantic for a
                            successful operation. But he, coupled with Dr. Odum, gave the Council
                            from its start a certain prestige and a certain public faith in its
                            findings. Dr. Odum had written his <hi rend="i">Southern Regions</hi>,
                            and Guy had been a professor of sociology for many years. And they were
                            men who were accustomed to the methods of research and to be sure that
                            your facts are right. They commanded the respect not only of the
                            academic community but of the South generally. So I think if anything
                            should be said it is that they gave us a degree of public confidence
                            that we would not have gotten from any other source.</p>
                        <p>George Mitchell succeeded Guy Johnson. Two more unlike people you could
                            hardly imagine. George was exuberant, and he had gifts for public
                            speaking. Completely fearless and unconventional on every issue,
                            including race, he had the ability to inspire people emotionally, which
                            Guy Johnson lacked. As to whether or not he was Guy's peer in
                            organizing, I'm not equipped to say. But George deserves credit for
                            having been behind the movement to outlaw segregation. And he conducted
                            negotiations and helped others conduct negotiations with the Fund for
                            the Republic, which, for the first time in the Council's existence, gave
                            us a fairly comfortable financial situation. He did a masterful job of
                            making out a case to this newly formed foundation. And it was asked to
                            enter a field which most people approached with some trepidation, but
                            George was persuasive and he got them to do that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="3978" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:35:58"/>
                    <milestone n="3979" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:35:59"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Was part of his argument to them that the Supreme Court decision was
                            probably going to be coming down in a few years? Was there that kind of
                            awareness that this was about to happen and that preparation<pb id="p17" n="17"/> was needed?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I think all of us who were on the inside of the Council were quite sure
                            that that decision would be made. The question was when and how rapidly
                            the change should be made. George got that grant which put us in much
                            better position than before. From the beginning of his connection with
                            the Southern Regional Council, he saw it as a stopgap arrangement by
                            which state councils will be formed, being members of the Southern
                            Regional Council. They would establish themselves to the point that the
                            state would take over their duties as a function of the state. That idea
                            would never have occurred to me, and I don't think it occurred to anyone
                            else except George. But he had a firm belief that if you had the state
                            council in each state of the South and it demonstrated fairness and
                            thoroughness and good, sound judgment, politicians would ultimately take
                            it over. And that's happened, of course, in a good many cases. I think
                            Kentucky was probably the first one that established its own official
                            council of human relations. North Carolina set up what they called the
                            Good Neighbor Commission, I believe. So far as I know now, every state
                            has the equivalent of a state council on human relations. I've always
                            given George credit for great vision in having thought that far ahead. I
                            saw it always as a group of volunteer workers that would meet once a
                            year and get out a little paper and conduct some research, but it never
                            occurred to me that actually the states would take it over, which they
                            did.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>There was a good bit of conflict, though, later on when the<pb id="p18" n="18"/> Council started abandoning the state councils or wanted to
                            put their resources more into the work of the Atlanta staff and less
                            into the operations of the state councils? How did you feel about that
                            question?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I was in favor of making the Southern Regional Council a closed rather
                            than a mass membership organization. And that was the issue, whether we
                            should continue to have two or three thousand members scattered over the
                            South with no special responsibilities, or could we not function more
                            efficiently if we had, say, a hundred members that had a board of
                            directors and so on. I'm firmly convinced that was a wise decision. And
                            by no means did we cut the connection or burn our bridges with the state
                            groups. They, I think, should have felt that they were on their own.
                            They had resources that they could tap, and we'd always maintain
                            pleasant diplomatic relations. But I'm sure that the Council functioned
                            much more efficiently when it functioned as a fairly small unit. The
                            further you get away from democracy, perhaps the closer you get to
                            efficiency, and that was the point there.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Did you feel, too, that the state councils were more conservative, or was
                            the opposite the case?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>This is a misapprehension among a great many people. There was no effort
                            to downgrade the state councils or to feel that they are any more
                            conservative than we are or any more liberal than we are. It was a
                            matter of the interest in an efficient operation. We had a headquarters
                            in Atlanta and gave counsel, advice, and a certain percentage of the
                            finances to the states. They ought to initiate their own programs. A
                            program for South Carolina may not be<pb id="p19" n="19"/> what would be
                            needed in Louisiana by any means. So there never was any attempt to
                            downgrade them, but the state councils, I think, got that impression,
                            which was quite erroneous.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="3979" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:41:13"/>
                    <milestone n="4548" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:41:14"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I think I got you off the track. We were going down through the
                            directors.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4548" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:41:23"/>
                    <milestone n="3980" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:41:24"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>George Mitchell, as I say, succeeded Guy Johnson, and Harold Fleming
                            succeeded George Mitchell. Harold, as you probably know, was an Atlanta
                            boy fresh out of Harvard who had become interested in the race problem.
                            He went to see Ralph McGill, the Editor of the Atlanta <hi rend="i">Constitution</hi>, for a job. He wanted to write, presumably on
                            social issues. McGill, who was on the Board of the Southern Regional
                            Council, or who at least had been one of the signers to get the charter,
                            told Harold, "We don't have money enough to employ a man for
                            that particular field, but there's a little organization around the
                            corner here, the Southern Regional Council, that's got a little paper,
                            and it seems to me that you'd be just the man for that job." So
                            Harold applied to George Mitchell, I guess, for the job and was given
                            the job of editor of this paper. He was an immediate success in that
                            job. It was much more than merely editing this paper; he established
                            rapport with all newspaper people, and particularly the representatives
                            of the New York <hi rend="i">Times</hi>. They had a southern
                            correspondent based in Atlanta, and Harold was always on friendly terms
                            with people like James Reston, Claude Sitton (who is now the Editor of
                            the Raleigh <hi rend="i">News and Observer</hi>), and so on. He knew the
                            newspaper business, so that he could prepare a release which they would
                            use. Most releases seem to be argumentative and protracted; Harold's
                            were concise, to the point,<pb id="p20" n="20"/> and thoroughly logical
                            The newspapermen appreciated it. Consequently, we always had a good
                            outside press as well as the Atlanta papers. The <hi rend="i">Times</hi>
                            and the Washington <hi rend="i">Post</hi> were great allies of ours.
                            That was Harold's particular forte. He had gifts also as an organizer,
                            but his forte was to put into words which would be readable and
                            acceptable by publishers ideas that the Southern Regional Council wanted
                            to get circulated. He was an enormous success in that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>How did he differ from George Mitchell in his attitudes?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Actually, George Mitchell had great difficulty getting along with women
                            members of the staff. I think he would probably have to have been one of
                            the original male chauvinists. But he and Harold were devoted to each
                            other, and when George stepped down he said, "I've got to make
                            way for a better man than I am." He felt it sincerely, and I
                            don't say that he was correct in that statement but no one could
                            overestimate Harold's value.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Why couldn't he get along with the women in the Council?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I have discussed that with his wife sometime, and she is not so sure that
                            that is correct. But he seldom had a woman employee whom he thoroughly
                            appreciated. Katherine Stoney and Mrs. McLean. We had a Mrs. Somebody
                            from Florida. He had rows with all of them; why, I don't know.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="3980" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:45:39"/>
                    <milestone n="4549" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:45:40"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Very interesting.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Then Harold was succeeded by Les Dunbar.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Then Harold moved on to the Potomac Foundation?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, he did.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>What precipitated his leaving the Council?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p21" n="21"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I suppose the Potomac Foundation offer. I'm not sure about that. I can
                            tell you why he got that later on, why the offer came to him. But maybe
                            we'd better go back to Harold just a moment. He worked on up to
                            Executive Director, coming there to edit the little paper. As Executive
                            Director he did an excellent job all the way through there. He had the
                            great ability to state both sides of a question fairly. The issue was
                            sharply presented; you knew what you were voting for or against. While
                            director, he had the delightful experience one day of being visited by a
                            couple who came in and introduced themselves as Mr. and Mrs. Currier.
                            They sat down and asked what would the Southern Regional Council do if
                            it had ?100,000. At that time, that was more money than we would have
                            dreamed of. The budget was probably ?20,000 or ?25,000 a year.</p>
                        <p>Harold had evidently given a good deal of thought to what he would do if
                            he had money, so he reeled off several objectives that the Council
                            should adopt, in his opinion, at once. And the Curriers were evidently
                            impressed. So they sent in Gulf Oil stock which amounted to ?100,000
                            and, I think, would be worth far more than that now. But that enabled us
                            to set up a little reserve fund, the first time we had had anything like
                            that.</p>
                        <p>Mrs. Currier was a Pittsburgh Mellon and had a great deal of the family
                            wealth. she had humanitarian concerns and was interested in the race
                            issue. I don't know about Mr. Currier's convictions, but certainly she
                            had the money and he went along with the ideas. So they later set up a
                            foundation known as the Potomac Institute, and I suspect that Harold was
                            probably the only professional in that field<pb id="p22" n="22"/> whom
                            they knew, and he had made an excellent impression on them. So they
                            offered him the job as its Director, either they or the Institute after
                            the Curriers' death. The Foundation, at least, offered him the job. The
                            Curriers were lost at sea, a plane crash.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Did the Council sell the stock?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I'm sure that ultimately it was sold to establish a fund, and the money
                            was put in the bank. I think it was in Harold's regime that a
                            newspaperwoman came south to study racial problems. She came inevitably
                            to the Southern Regional Council, which was generally recognized as the
                            spokesman for enlightenment. I wish I could be sure about the person
                            with whom she talked, but she talked either with George Mitchell or
                            Harold Fleming. And they gave her a rundown on what the Southern
                            Regional Council was trying to do. So she made extensive notes and went
                            back to Boston Shortly after that had lunch with an old gentleman who
                            was quite wealthy. He expressed some interest in racial matters, and
                            wanted to leave some money for an organization active in that field. She
                            said that she had just talked with an outfit which struck her as being
                            eminently worthy of support. It seems to me he left us ?15,000; at least
                            we participated under his will. So again
                            personalities—particularly Harold's
                            personality—moved him up the ladder to the Potomac Institute,
                            where his salary probably was five or six times what he got from us. And
                            also either his or George's personality brought this legacy from someone
                            in Boston.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>What proportion of the Council's funding in that period came from
                            individual donations, as opposed to foundations?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p23" n="23"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>From the time that the foundations picked us up, and I don't say because
                            of that . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Which was, say, '53? That's when the Fund for the Republic grant came
                            through?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I never remember dates; I'm not sure. But the Fund for the Republic was a
                            subsudiary of the Ford Foundation, a much larger thing. But these grants
                            were really quite large in our experience. And I presume that our
                            membership continued to pay about what it had been paying; I don't have
                            access to the records; but their contributions were overshadowed by
                            grants from the Field Foundation and the Fund for the Republic and many
                            others. I will say organized labor always made us a small grant, largely
                            as a result of George Mitchell's influence, because he had been an
                            organizer for AFL-CIO before he came to the Council.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Were there any wealthy southerners who contributed significantly to the
                            Council?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>We never got any large donations from wealthy southerners, and, really,
                            wealth was not a characteristic of most of the members of the Board. I
                            think they contributed with reasonable generosity, but not the large
                            amounts that we got from the foundations.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Any corporate donations?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I would doubt that we had any corporate contributors. There would be
                            reluctance, I think, of a director to contribute funds of the
                            stockholders to something that was as controversial as the Southern
                            Regional Council was at that time.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4549" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:53:25"/>
                    <milestone n="3981" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:53:26"/>
                    <pb id="p24" n="24"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Les Dunbar came up through pretty much the same route that Harold Fleming
                            had come up through, didn't he? He was Research Director, I think.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>He was, and I think in that capacity he probably got out the <hi rend="i">New South</hi>, which was the successor to <hi rend="i">Southern
                                Frontiers</hi>. He came there, I think, from Mount Holyoke. He was a
                            college professor, He came to us in this research and public relations
                            capacity. But when Harold Fleming left, he and Dunbar had become close
                            friends. They were both able men. And it was almost inevitable that we
                            turned to Les. He had attended all Board meetings; he was a very
                            thoughtful, philosophical kind of person, moved slowly but correctly
                            almost all the time. A thoroughly admirable character, and a very able
                            man. Like Harold, he was called up higher. The Field Foundation, with
                            which he had negotiated grants, had been impressed by him, and so they
                            then called him in as Director of the Field Foundation.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>It sounds as if there wasn't much question about who would become the
                            next Executive Director down through these people. It was pretty much
                            handed on from man to man.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>It was. It was almost a hierarchy, and the power passed from one to the
                            other. Les's departure brought to the front another director, Paul
                            Anthony. He had been there, I think, as the liaison between the state
                            organizations and the Southern Regional Council; he was the contact man,
                            we'll say. I know that we had on the staff a certain person whose duty
                            was to ride herd on state groups and be of such assistance as he could.
                            Paul was an agreeable personality, lacking<pb id="p25" n="25"/> the
                            background of any of his predecessors. I don't know what his background
                            was, but the others had more than a dash of the scholarly about them.
                            Paul was eminently a person whose feet were on the ground, and
                            practical. So he never had the aura that his predecessors had. But I
                            think he labored as earnestly as he could to keep the Council going.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="3981" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:56:40"/>
                    <milestone n="3982" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:56:41"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I was living in Atlanta when Paul Anthony was Director, and knew he was
                            involved with the Council at that time. I don't know whether it was
                            before his appointment or before George Esser's appointment, but people
                            had begun to raise the question of the need for a black Director; there
                            was more controversy and questioning about who should be the Director by
                            then, I think.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. That originated under Paul's regime. It was inevitable that the
                            question should arise. I'm familiar with another organization that went
                            through that same process, and that organization to which I refer now
                            has a black Director, and the membership on the Board, I should say,
                            probably would be more than fifty percent black. So as the Negroes began
                            to assert themselves in politics and in business, they asserted
                            themselves in organizations which were set up particularly for this
                            benefit, It was quite natural that pressure for black leadership should
                            have arisen. It was unfortunate that it produced some division or
                            dissension, and I hope that that's passed away. I attended one meeting
                            where tempers were high, but my tenure on the Board expired during Paul
                            Anthony's regime. I suspect if I had continued after I had been
                                present<pb id="p26" n="26"/> at a meeting where tempers did flare, I
                            would have been more exposed to a display of ill temper and that kind of
                            thing. But when I left, fortunately for me, I got out before that became
                            too bad.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="3982" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:58:45"/>
                    <milestone n="4550" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:58:46"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>But the dissension and disagreement was mainly over the need for a black
                            director?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>It did not come up when Paul was elected, because I participated in that
                            election. It must have come up when George Esser was elected. I can't
                            tell you anything about Mr. Esser. I was off the Board when he came in,
                            and you've extracted all the information you can from me about the
                            staff.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Why did you leave the Board?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I'd been on there a long, long time. I suppose there must have been gaps
                            when I was not on there and went back on. But I certainly was at least
                            seventy years old, and I'm a strong believer that people had better
                            retire before they're kicked out.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>
                            <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note>
                        </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>There was no movement to do that. But I did that with very serious
                            motives, first of all age, and in the second place I could see the
                            handwriting on the wall. There was a new spirit abroad in the
                            organization. I was of the old school. I might not have been too
                            congenial in this new atmosphere. So when it came up for me to be
                            reelected, I declined to let my name be used. I think it was wise. I
                            don't know that I was inflexible—I hope I was
                            not—but I think that a new spirit ought not to be hampered by
                            having imposed upon it someone who's not quite adapted to what the new
                            movement is. I was brought up<pb id="p27" n="27"/> in an earlier regime
                            which was slow-moving, and I liked it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>But in what sense are you using the term "the old
                            school"? What was the difference that you felt between your
                            stance toward things and the stance of these, I suppose, younger people
                            who were coming in?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>All during my connection with the Board and the staff, I never saw the
                            slightest evidence of disharmony in the staff, and there was really a
                            very delightful rapport between staff and Board. So at a meeting that I
                            mentioned, it became evident that blacks were not satisfied with that
                            arrangement. Blacks that I knew, I think they were, but we often
                            misjudge blacks. And so I felt that I had been adequate to serve on a
                            board where people act in harmony with each other. I did not know how I
                            would react if some divisive issue arose.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>It wasn't so much particular issues as just divisiveness in itself.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>That's true.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Conflict and the potential for conflict.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Many tears were actually shed at that meeting to which I refer; literally
                            true. And so everybody felt very badly about it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I was there when Paul Anthony left and George Esser came in. I remember
                            those were very painful days.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>That was another question I wanted to ask you, was about the relationship
                            between the Board and the staff. And you're saying that there was really
                            no . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>[END OF TAPE 1, SIDE B]</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                </div2>
                <div2 id="tape2-a" n="2-A" type="tape_side">
                    <head>[TAPE 2, SIDE A]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 2, SIDE A]</p>
                    </note>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p> . . . no conflict, that . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>As I stated a while ago, George Mitchell had his personal differences
                            with members of the staff; I think I could say almost exclusively female
                            members of the staff. But at our meetings, staff and Board were, I
                            thought, thoroughly congenial. Staff members expressed themselves very
                            frankly and that kind of thing. We formed a great attachment for Mrs.
                            Ruth Alexander. (She's now Mrs. Vick I believe.) And Harold Fleming's
                            secretary, Mildred Johnson. They were both black. I suppose half the
                            staff would have been black in my day. I could detect no dissension.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>How active a role did the Board play in setting policy for the Council
                            when you were on the Board?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>It was an assertive Board; it was not a rubber stamp by any means. And we
                            were fortunate in having directors who brought issues to the Board. And
                            we were confronted with making decisions; we made them, and the staff
                            carried them out.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>You said that since you've been off the Board since about 1970, that's
                            all the information you can give. But I was curious whether, just
                            watching from the sidelines, you have any ideas about . . . The Council
                            has gone through some very radical changes, it seems to me, over that
                            period, first growing a great deal under George Esser and now being
                            reduced to a much smaller operation than it was.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I'm glad that I got out when I did.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4550" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="01:04:58"/>
                    <milestone n="3983" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="01:04:59"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>What is your feeling, though, about why what seems to be a decline in the
                            Council has happened?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>It's inevitable. The Southern Regional Council had a<pb id="p29" n="29"/>
                            reason for being when you were fighting to establish the rights of a
                            minority in this country. People would contribute to it; they took
                            interest in it; you had something you could fight over. Now the rights
                            have been either Congressionally or judicially established. If our sole
                            mission had been to secure those rights, we should quit business at that
                            time. It takes a different temperament and different talent to operate
                            in an area when law has already stepped in. So I think it quite natural
                            that you feel now not that we want to leave everything up to the
                            government, but that the government has done the job, and the government
                            is equipped to carry it on. Why should a private organization continue
                            to exist? That's what it gets down to.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Part of what was going on, though, during George Esser's period was an
                            effort to redirect the Council toward a different approach and different
                            issues and so on, but that didn't seem to work.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>If I were cynical, as I hope I am not, I would say that for the same
                            reason that I criticize a government agency for seeking to preserve
                            itself after it has accomplished its purpose, I would say that the
                            Southern Regional Council had been attempting to preserve itself after
                            its principal mission was accomplished. You have now the Urban League,
                            which works on employment. The field is pretty well occupied, and our
                            principal mission is ended.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="3983" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="01:07:12"/>
                    <milestone n="4551" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="01:07:13"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Did anyone seriously advocate that the Council should disband at some
                            certain point when it had . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>No, not while I was on there. The idea had occurred to me, but I did not
                            . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>It's not the kind of thing that you can really bring up.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p30" n="30"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>And I don't wish to downgrade the present activities. I'm not informed
                            about them. And there may be ample space for the use of such talents as
                            the staff may have. It seems to me that the better view would have been
                            that the new situation takes a new type of organization and new gifts in
                            Board and staff.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4551" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="01:08:05"/>
                    <milestone n="3984" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="01:08:06"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Looking back over the different periods of the SRC, do you see any real
                            difference in the strategies that the Council pursued, say, up until
                            1954 and then after 1954? Real breaks in what the Council was trying to
                            do?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I think there was a definite change in strategy. Up until 1954, your
                            whole concern was to get segregation declared to be against the law. At
                            that time the Southern Regional Council had the law against it;
                            segregation was on the books. From 1954 on, the law was on our side. So
                            whereas up until the Supreme Court decision we put all of our efforts
                            into seeing that laws are enacted and that courts correctly interpret
                            them, after that point the task becomes one of persuading the public to
                            abide by the law. Up to that time, you were trying to persuade the
                            public to repeal the law; now you've got it repealed. You would want to
                            move into a new atmosphere as peacefully as you could. So I think the
                            whole thing was that we were militant when militance was what was
                            needed, and I think we have been persuasive where persuasion has been
                            needed.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you see the Council as being more militant in the fifties?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, until the law was on the books we benefitted from persecution. And
                            Talmadge and Wallace, you name them, were all fighting us.<pb id="p31" n="31"/> They'd have people go to meetings and get license numbers
                            of cars and trace down who were the owners and take snapshots of those
                            present so on. So it appealed a little bit to your feeling of intrigue.
                                <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> And I think people could
                            show more fervor. Early Christians probably were a darned sight more
                            fervent than the later ones because they were being persecuted. And we,
                            in a sense, were being persecuted, so you had the temptation to fight
                            back. When there is no occasion for fighting, you have a tendency to
                            lose your ardor.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="3984" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="01:10:58"/>
                    <milestone n="3985" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="01:10:59"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>When massive resistance emerged in the White Citizens' Councils and so
                            on, did that surprise you? Did you have a feeling of having failed to
                            mobilize white sentiment?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I missed the boat entirely. I had the feeling that the South would go
                            ahead with it gracefully. To use George Mitchell's phrase, that it would
                            "curl up at the edges" and become accepted very
                            quickly. I was never more surprised in my life than when what would have
                            been ordinarily thought of as good citizens formed the White Citizens'
                            Councils. I had more respect for Byrd in Virginia with his outright plea
                            for massive resistance than I did for these little imitations of the Ku
                            Klux Klan, people who were respectable but not worthy, who began to
                            fight it</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>What made you think that there was going to be widespread white
                            acceptance of desegregation?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I'd say two things. First of all, I had a certain faith in the innate
                            goodness of people. In the second place, and the most<pb id="p32" n="32"/> persuasive thing to me, the South had gone along for years
                            maintaining dual everything. Administrative problems were immensely
                            complicated. Your financial problems were almost doubled, and so on. So
                            I had thought that the South would be very glad to be rid of trying to
                            maintain separate everything. Also the South was becoming the subject of
                            ridicule throughout the country, and I thought most southerners would
                            not like to see themselves thought of as being hellions and
                            blackguardly-type persons. So those two things, I think my childish
                            faith in the goodness of the white southerner, and the financial
                            argument— I thought these would swing it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>How do you account for the strong resistance that did emerge?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>That prejudice is deeper than I had thought.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you think that if the courts, for example, had moved more quickly to
                            really enforce the decision, people might have accepted? I've heard it
                            argued that there was a time right after '54 when if the government had
                            moved ahead more quickly and desegregated facilities, that people would
                            have accepted it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>It's always what might have happened on the road not taken. And frankly,
                            my mind is open still on the issue, but I have the feeling that the
                            delay was worthwhile. If I had to vote, I would favor the action that
                            the court took.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>But that did give the opposition time to organize.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>But the opposition could never say that this thing was forced on us
                            overnight. First of all, there had been a whole series of<pb id="p33" n="33"/> decisions that made this one inevitable. Now this decision
                            comes down, and they say, "Segregation is wrong. We want you
                            people to tell us how to implement it." I thought that ought to
                            appeal to people, that the Court didn't say, "Here, you do this
                            thing or else." It's like Carter's attitude about the coal
                            strike. I think he put it off a long time, but I think it meant time
                            well spent, that the public, the miners, everybody else say that we've
                            had every opportunity to settle this thing. I was hoping that southern
                            people would say, "Well, now, we've had a chance. We fought
                            integration as a principle. We've had a chance to say how it should be
                            put into effect. That's all we could ask. We've had our day in court.
                            We'll go along with what the Court decided." But I had no idea
                            at all that there would be this revolt.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Was there another change in strategy when it became clear that that
                            persuasion of the white South to go along with the desegregation was not
                            going to be easy?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I suspect that we began to aim our fire more specifically at
                            organizations, private schools, academies, and white citizens' councils
                            generally. We did have those targets, at least, that we could work on,
                            and that kept us going for some time.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="3985" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="01:16:04"/>
                    <milestone n="4552" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="01:16:05"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Did you move up here to Linville Falls in 1948?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>1947.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>So you were living here all the time that you were involved in these
                            things in the fifties and sixties.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>That's true.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p34" n="34"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>That must have caused some logistical problems, travelling back and
                            forth?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>No, I used to drive to Greenville and catch a plane to Atlanta. I, of
                            course, always had to spend the night in Atlanta, maybe two nights. But
                            I was frankly so delighted to be a member of that group that I did not
                            care what time or expense was involved. They were choice people, no
                            question about it, and I felt honored to be able to sit down and talk
                            with them.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Had you retired from the practice of law, then, when you moved here?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I retired when I came up here in 1947.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Had you found conflict between your career as a lawyer and your
                            involvement in interracial activities?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>No. People ask me that, and it would seem reasonable that that would be
                            true. But my attitude was quite well known. I made a commencement speech
                            in Conway, South Carolina, in 1919, in which I advocated Negro voting in
                            the Democratic primary, and the next day or so I moved to town. So that,
                            I'll say, did not get me off to a good start. I did not anticipate this
                            result, but I think it was highly beneficial. I did not go in for
                            criminal practice, in a criminal practice, you have to appeal to jurors.
                            Most of them are backwoodsmen, ignorant and so on. I was in civil
                            practice entirely, where the man who hired you was much more concerned
                            with your ability than your political views. So I'm sure it did not hurt
                            me. I rather think it helped me.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Why would it have helped you?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p35" n="35"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Because I think people at least gave me credit for being willing to
                            express an opinion.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>They knew where you stood.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Did you have some association with Jimmy Byrnes?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I've met him; that's all. I was in his office in Washington a time or
                            two. But I've known other demagogues: Ben Tillman, Strom Thurmond,
                            Cotton Ed Smith, Cole Blease. I knew them all personally. And I suppose
                            I'm one of the few alive that did know them personally.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I was just talking to Dan Pollitt in Greenville. He was at this meeting,
                            and he thought that you had had some association with Jimmy Byrnes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I disliked him strongly and wrote him several letters, that kind of
                            thing. His job took him to Washington. All the time that I knew him, he
                            was in Washington. And my contacts were with the politicians in South
                            Carolina. Then by the time Byrnes came back, I had moved here. When he
                            was Governor, I was living here.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Was your real interest more in your outside activities, rather than in
                            the practice of law?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Much more. And I have another lawyer friend whom I greatly admire. We
                            both agree that we were almost ashamed to practice law. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> Not that there's anything
                            disreputable about it. Dean Acheson was another one, by the way.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>And he felt the same way?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p36" n="36"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p><note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> My nephew worked in Acheson's
                            firm. Acheson was the head man, and my nephew was way down on the totem
                            pole. There were about 300 lawyers on the firm. My nephew decided he
                            wanted to get into something else, so he made an engagement to see Mr.
                            Acheson. He'd never met him. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note>
                            He'd been on the staff there for two or three years. So he went in and
                            told Mr. Acheson, "I'd like to get into some other line of
                            work." So Mr. Acheson said, "I gather you don't like
                            the practice of law." My nephew said, "I
                            don't." Mr. Acheson said, "I can't stand it. It's just
                            a farily easy way to make a living."</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p><note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> You write beautifully, and I
                            know that you started out as a reporter. I wondered if maybe you felt
                            that your real calling might have been more writing and journalism.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Journalism has become a much more respected and well paid profession than
                            it was when I was a reporter. There was no money in it, and certainly no
                            glory. The law did offer a chance to make a pretty good living without
                            much brainwork, so I took that. But if I'd come along, I think, now,
                            where columnists turn them out by the day and Walter Cronkite and these
                            people are on the air, that would have been the thing I'd much rather
                            have done. Yes. And you'd have much more impact on humanity that way,
                            too.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Were you able to live, then, on the money that you had made as a
                        lawyer?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, yes. I did very well on that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>You had had this as a summer home?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I had, yes, for about ten years before building this house here.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p37" n="37"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>You didn't feel isolated, being in an out-of-the-way place?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>No, my heavens alive, no sirree. I think that I have done more of what I
                            like to do here than I would have done at Chapel Hill or any other
                            place. There are no distractions here. If you don't turn it out, it's
                            your fault.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Exactly. It's very appealing.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I'm writing a speech now, and I can sit here and write three or four
                            hours, and tomorrow three or four hours, with no interruptions.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4552" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="01:22:31"/>
                    <milestone n="3986" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="01:22:32"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>We were talking about some of the changes in strategy and policies the
                            Council developed. In 1960 when the sit-ins started, when the direct
                            action movement started, what role do you feel that the Council played
                            in the direct action movement?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>It did not participate in direct action, with my knowledge. It could be
                            possible that . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Was there a conscious policy that members of the Council should not
                            participate in . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, that's true. We had, I hope, established the reputation for being
                            trustworthy in the field of research. And it certainly struck me, and I
                            think the rest of us, that if you get out and parade and carry flags and
                            that sort of thing, people will develop some lack of confidence in the
                            idea that that kind of person or that kind of an organization should
                            also produce material that one should take seriously. In other words,
                            when you're on a street, your partisanship is in everybody's face. You
                            wouldn't have much faith in the research of a man who was admittedly a
                            partisan on that issue. So I think<pb id="p38" n="38"/> we were wise to
                            keep in the cloister—I don't say closet—and
                            maintain public respect. And I don't think anyone ever quite doubted the
                            accuracy of the research we did and news releases we issued.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>Was there any conflict over that issue? Were there people who thought
                            that the Council should be more directly involved, or who wanted to be
                            more directly . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>That bobbed up every now and then, but it never was made an issue,
                            particularly.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="3986" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="01:24:23"/>
                    <milestone n="4553" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="01:24:24"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I came across an incident in your papers that I thought was sort of
                            interesting though a little bit confusing. You may not remember this,
                            but in 1961 Les Dunbar wrote a report on the freedom rides. And there
                            was some criticism of his report, and you were suggesting that the
                            Council might want to issue a second report sort of modifying what
                            Dunbar had said. And I wasn't clear whether you felt that Les Dunbar's
                            report on the freedom rides had been too critical of the freedom rides,
                            or whether it had been too laudatory.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">MARION WRIGHT:</speaker>
                        <p>I have no recollection of that. I wrote a review of a book called <hi rend="i">Freedom Ride</hi> for the Progressive Magazine. I was
                            definitely on the side of the riders and wrote a great many things at
                            that time that allied me with them. So I would not have been opposed to
                            anything Les said on the theory that we had taken the wrong side of this
                            issue; I'm sure of that. Because the freedom rides and the atrocities
                            that were committed on the freedom riders were really a dark page in
                            southern history.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">JACQUELYN HALL:</speaker>
                        <p>I just wondered whether there might have been some question as to whether
                            the Council should take an unequivocal ly positive stand in<pb id="p39" n="39"/> favor of the sit-ins and the freedom rides when they first
                            occurred. <ref id="ref2" target="n2">2</ref>
                            <note id="n2" target="ref2">
                                <p>2 In a letter to Jacquelyn Hall, June 15, 1978, Les Dunbar
                                    provided the following information: "I have an
                                    indistinct recollection that Mr. Wright <hi rend="i">was</hi>
                                    troubled by the report we put out. So were others, though it was
                                    a controversial issue then among civil rights partisans and we
                                    had supporters as well. In my own thinking at that time, I made
                                    a distinction between the sit-ins of the 1960s and the Freedom
                                    Rides of 1961. Within SRC's staff I had pushed for a prompt and
                                    full endorsement of the sit-ins and Harold agreed and within
                                    days, just about, of the first Greensboro sit-in SRC was out
                                    with a ‘special report,’ strongly
                                    supportive. I believe that was important at the time, because
                                    the sit-ins were new, people were not adjusted to the idea of
                                    them, and it meant something to liberals and moderates
                                    (including newspapers, national and southern) for SRC to say
                                    they were good. So I remember feeling lots of hope throughout
                                    1960, strengthened also by my hopes for the incoming
                                    administration. I saw the Freedom Ride as, in effect, a
                                    ‘nationalizing’ of the civil rights
                                    movement — which up to then had been almost entirely
                                    a southern people's effort — and I feared that
                                    something which was going hopefully would be disarranged; and
                                    also the R. Kennedy et al should be given a chance to get the
                                    bus lines into compliance. So (and by this time Harold was gone
      