<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite_sohp_ms.dtd">
<TEI.2>
    <teiHeader type="Southern Oral History Project" status="new">
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title type="main">
                    <hi rend="bold">Oral History Interview with John Raymond Shute, June 25, 1982.
                        Interview B-0054-1. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007):</hi>
                    Electronic Edition. </title>
                <title type="descriptive">A Century of Growth in Union County, North Carolina</title>
                <author>
                    <name id="sj" reg="Shute, John Raymond" type="interviewee">Shute, John
                    Raymond</name>, interviewee </author>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Interview conducted by </resp>
                    <name id="dw" reg="Durrill, Wayne" type="interviewer">Durrill, Wayne</name>
                </respStmt>
                <funder>Funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services supported the
                    electronic publication of this interview.</funder>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
                    <name id="jdj">Jennifer Joyner</name>
                </respStmt>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Sound recordings digitized by </resp>
                    <name id="as">Aaron Smithers</name>
                    <name id="sfc">Southern Folklife Collection</name>
                </respStmt>
            </titleStmt>
            <editionStmt>
                <edition>First edition, <date>2007</date>
                </edition>
            </editionStmt>
            <extent>228 Kb</extent>
            <publicationStmt>
                <publisher>The University Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill </publisher>
                <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace>
                <date>2007.</date>
                <availability status="unknown">
                    <p>© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina at Chapel
                        Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching and
                        personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the
                        text.</p>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <biblFull id="recording">
                    <recording type="audio" dur="02:58:14">
                        <p>MP3 file derived from WAV preservation master, which was derived from
                            original analog cassettes.</p>
                    </recording>
                    <titleStmt>
                        <title type="recording">Oral History Interview with John Raymond Shute, June
                            25, 1982. Interview B-0054-1. Southern Oral History Program Collection
                            (#4007)</title>
                        <title type="series">Series B. Individual Biographies. Southern Oral History
                            Program Collection (B-0054-1)</title>
                        <author>Wayne Durrill</author>
                    </titleStmt>
                    <extent>326 Mb</extent>
                    <publicationStmt>
                        <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, N. C.</pubPlace>
                        <publisher>Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina at
                            Chapel Hill</publisher>
                        <date>25 June 1982</date>
                        <authority/>
                    </publicationStmt>
                </biblFull>
                <biblFull>
                    <titleStmt>
                        <title type="transcript">Oral History Interview with John Raymond Shute,
                            June 25, 1982. Interview B-0054-1. Southern Oral History Program
                            Collection (#4007)</title>
                        <title type="series">Series B. Individual Biographies. Southern Oral History
                            Program Collection (B-0054-1)</title>
                        <author>John Raymond Shute</author>
                    </titleStmt>
                    <extent>78 p.</extent>
                    <publicationStmt>
                        <publisher>Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina at
                            Chapel Hill</publisher>
                        <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace>
                        <date>25 June 1982</date>
                        <authority/>
                    </publicationStmt>
                    <notesStmt>
                        <note anchored="no">Interview conducted on June 25, 1982, by Wayne Durrill;
                            recorded in Monroe, North Carolina.</note>
                        <note anchored="no"> Transcribed by Jean Houston.</note>
                        <note anchored="no"> Forms part of: Southern Oral History Program Collection
                            (#4007): Series B. Individual Biographies, Manuscripts Department,
                            University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</note>
                        <note anchored="no">Original transcript on deposit at the Southern
                            Historical Collection, The Wilson Library, University of North Carolina
                            at Chapel Hill.</note>
                    </notesStmt>
                </biblFull>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <projectDesc>
                <p>The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-Chapel Hill digital library, <hi
                        rend="italics">Documenting the American South.</hi>
                </p>
            </projectDesc>
            <editorialDecl>
                <p>An audio file with the interview complements this electronic edition.</p>
                <p>The text has been entered using double-keying and verified against the original.</p>
                <p>The text has been encoded using the recommendations for Level 4 of the TEI in
                    Libraries Guidelines.</p>
                <p>Original grammar and spelling have been preserved. </p>
                <p>All quotation marks, em dashes and ampersand have been transcribed as entity
                    references.</p>
                <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as "</p>
                <p>All em dashes are encoded as —</p>
            </editorialDecl>
            <classDecl>
                <taxonomy id="lcsh">
                    <bibl>
                        <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings</title>
                    </bibl>
                </taxonomy>
                <taxonomy id="docsouth">
                    <bibl>
                        <title>Documenting the American South Topics</title>
                    </bibl>
                </taxonomy>
            </classDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
        <profileDesc>
            <langUsage>
                <language id="eng">English</language>
            </langUsage>
            <textClass>
                <keywords scheme="lcsh">
                    <list type="simple">
                        <item>
                            <!-- LC headings go here -->
                        </item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                <keywords scheme="docsouth">
                    <list type="main_topic">
                        <item>Politics and Government <list type="sub-topic">
                                <item>North Carolina</item>
                            </list>
                        </item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
            </textClass>
        </profileDesc>
        <revisionDesc>
            <change>
                <date>2007-00-00, </date>
                <respStmt>
                    <name>Celine Noel, Wanda Gunther, and Kristin Martin </name>
                    <resp/>
                </respStmt>
                <item> revised TEIHeader and created catalog record for the electronic
                edition.</item>
            </change>
            <change>
                <date>2007-02-09, </date>
                <respStmt>
                    <name>Jennifer Joyner </name>
                    <resp/>
                </respStmt>
                <item>finished TEI-conformant encoding and final proofing.</item>
            </change>
        </revisionDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text id="ohs_B-0054-1">
        <front>
            <div1 type="about_interview">
                <head>Interview with John Raymond Shute, June 25, 1982. Interview B-0054-1.</head>
                <byline>Conducted by Wayne Durrill</byline>
                <note type="deposit" anchored="no">
                    <p>Transcript on deposit at The Southern Historical Collection, The Louis Round
                        Wilson Library</p>
                </note>
                <note type="citation" anchored="no">
                    <p>Citation of this interview should be as follows: <lb/>“Interview B-0054-1, in
                        the Southern Oral History Program Collection #4007, <lb/>Southern Historical
                        Collection, The Wilson Library, <lb/>University of North Carolina at Chapel
                        Hill”</p>
                </note>
                <note type="copyright" anchored="no">Copyright © 2007 The University of North
                    Carolina</note>
            </div1>
            <div1 type="abstract">
                <head>Abstract</head>
                <p>Born in 1904 in Monroe, North Carolina, John Raymond Shute found success in
                    business and politics in his hometown. In this interview, he discusses
                    nineteenth-century North Carolina history and his own experience contributing to
                    the development of Monroe and Union County. Shute offers a great many details on
                    county governance in Union County. Selected passages focus on the development of
                    roads and farms and broader claims about the area. Researchers interested in
                    other developments, especially the specifics of county governance, should read
                    the interview in its entirety.</p>
            </div1>
            <div1 type="short_abstract">
                <head>Short Abstract</head>
                <p>John Raymond Shute looks back on a century of growth in Union County, North
                    Carolina. Drawing on his many years active in politics there, Shute shares his considerable
                    knowledge about the agricultural and industrial development in the area.</p>
            </div1>
        </front>
        <body>
            <div1 id="B-0054-1" type="sohp_interview">
                <head>Interview with John Raymond Shute, June 25, 1982. <lb/>Interview B-0054-1.
                    Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007)</head>
                <list type="simple">
                    <head>Interview Participants</head>
                    <item>
                        <name id="spk1" key="js" reg="Shute, John Raymond" type="interviewee">JOHN
                            RAYMOND SHUTE</name>, interviewee</item>
                    <item>
                        <name id="spk2" key="wd" reg="Durrill, Wayne" type="interviewer">WAYNE
                            DURRILL</name>, interviewer</item>
                </list>
                <div2 id="tape1-a" n="1-A" type="tape_side">
                    <pb id="p1" n="1"/>
                    <head>[TAPE 1, SIDE A]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 1, SIDE A]</p>
                    </note>
                    <milestone n="4714" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:00:00"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>This is the interview with Ray Shute. Let's start with your family. You
                            said you had one fellow who was in the wagon train in the 1870's and
                            came into Monroe.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>You're talking, I presume, about my grandfather, John Shute.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>John Shure, right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>John Shute was born in Lancaster County, South Carolina, in 1824.
                            Together with his family, which at that time was three children, Mary,
                            Henry and Raymond, and his brother Sylvester and his wife, he had
                            started to Mississippi. The first day they traveled eighteen
                            miles—that's the distance from their home which was in Tabernacle
                            community of Lancaster County—to Monroe. Monroe was just a young town at
                            that time, only eleven years since it had been chartered. Like all other
                            towns of the period they had a camp lot, and travelers, which, of
                            course, was by buggy or wagon, always went to the town's camp lot to
                            unhitch and feed and spent the night. And everybody in town always went
                            to the camp lot to see new strangers. That's the way they got
                            information about other parts of the country. Well, they came to the
                            camp lot in Monroe, which was located at what is now the corner of
                            Church and Franklin Streets in Monroe, and unhitched and set up for the
                            night. It was pouring down rain, and the people in town, the leading
                            citizens, came to the camp lot to see who they were and to meet them and
                            talk with them. Among those who came was the largest merchant in Monroe
                            at that time, John D. Stewart, who later was to become a very dear
                            friend of my grandfather, John Shute. Dr. Welch was another one who
                            came. I mention him for this reason: his son, the late John Welch, <pb
                                id="p2" n="2"/> told me about his father telling him about going
                            down to the camp lot and meeting the Shutes when they came in. He said
                            Mrs. Shute had a young baby just a few months old in her arms, and he
                            told her, "Mrs. Shute, turn that baby over on its belly. You're going to
                            drown it if you don't." It was pouring down rain. That was my father,
                            the baby. John D. Stewart told my grandfather, "There's no use to go to
                            Mississippi for the future; there's a future right here in Monroe. We
                            need very much a wagon train to take our cotton that we raise through
                            this section to Camden and Cheraw," which were the final ports on the
                            river system. At Cheraw, of course, it was the Pee Dee River that went
                            into Winyar Bay at Georgetown, and at Camden it was, of course, the
                            Catawba-Wateree system that went into Charleston. And he told him, "We
                            need to get our cotton to market, and that's the best way and the most
                            economical way." They had barges that came up to these ports from those
                            lower ports, and he said, "We ship our cotton mostly to New England to
                            the mills. Some of it goes to old England, and then we need to have
                            supplies that are brought in by ship to Charleston and Georgetown,
                            mostly Charleston, brought up to our stores in Monroe and Charlotte.
                            There's a wonderful opportunity here for somebody to get into this." It
                            appealed to my grandfather very much, and he decided he'd stay. His
                            brother Sylvester went on to Mississippi after a sojourn of two years in
                            Alabama. His wife had a child. She couldn't reach Mississippi before the
                            first child was born. It was born in Alabama, and then about a year
                            later the second child came. Sylvester had gotten a position as an
                            overseer on a plantation there. So they stayed there for over a year in
                            Alabama before they went on to Carroll <pb id="p3" n="3"/> County,
                            Mississippi, where, when he died, he was the largest landowner in the
                            county. Those were the delta lands where they raised three bales of
                            cotton to the acre. My grandfather John Shute in 1855 bought a homesite
                            on the corner of Windsor and Hayne Streets and built a home which still
                            stands. The first home was a modest home, and later he built a large
                            home in front of it and joined it. That was along about 1875. He bought
                            this lot from Doctor Franklin Hayden. He was not a doctor; that was his
                            real name. Incidentally, one of the Shute boys was named "Doctor" as one
                            of his given names. That was Doctor James Shute at Tabernacle. It was
                            not unusual to name children "Doctor." It might have given them a false
                            prestige in later life. Hayden moved to Monroe from Salisbury along
                            about 1840 before the city was actually laid out and chartered, and he
                            sold this lot to my grandfather. He also sold him a tract of land on…
                            Well, of course, all deeds said on the waters of Richardson Creek or
                            Bearskin Creek; they may have been miles away from the creek. He sold
                            him two other pieces of property, one of which was commercial where my
                            grandfather opened a store, and the other one was a farm. The family
                            prospered. John Shute was a very energetic man, and he started his wagon
                            trains, which were very successful. And he was the kind of man that when
                            he saw an opportunity, he'd go into it. Every time he would get a few
                            hundred dollars ahead, he'd buy a piece of property. He very seldom ever
                            sold any property, but he bought a lot. He wouldn't build a one-story
                            building. He said the most expensive part of a building was the roof.
                            And the roof didn't cost any more for a two- or three-storey building
                            than it did for a one-storey building, so he very seldom <pb id="p4"
                                n="4"/> ever built a one-story building. But he began to build
                            property, was the largest commercial property owner in town at the time
                            he died. He went into several things. He had a carding mill that carded
                            wool. He went into the cotton ginning business. He opened the first
                            steam-powered cotton gin. I have the governors off that old original gin
                            up at my house, just saving them, you know. The gin burned down. He had
                            more than one gin, incidentally. And then he opened a brickyard and made
                            brick. He opened a turning mill, a woodworking plant where they made
                            doors and windows and sashes and blinds and baluster rails and cabinets
                            and just all sorts of things, so that actually, as he began to acquire
                            property—and it was cheap then—he had all of the facilities for
                            building. He could build more economically than anyone else. Then he
                            opened a wholesale and retail grocery store, and that became very
                            profitable. He put my father in there when he was fourteen years old,
                            and he stayed there nearly fifty years. My grandfather died in 1896. He
                            was seventy-two years old. He died with what they called cramp colic.
                            Today we'd call it a ruptured appendix. My father said he never saw a
                            man suffer as much as his father did on his deathbed. He said all they
                            could do was to keep a quart of whiskey by his bed to try to keep him
                            intoxicated so he could stand the pain. Well, those are the early, early
                            years of my grandfather. The railroad came to Monroe in 1874, and that
                            put him out of business. So it's easy to understand why he opposed the
                            coming of the railroad. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Let me back up and ask a few more detailed questions.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>All right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What did John Shute do in South Carolina before he made his move?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p5" n="5"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>He farmed. He was just a young man. As a matter of fact, when he came to
                            Monroe he was only thirty-one years old. And he had farmed down there.
                            Where he lived, it was a rural community. Now he did have a little store
                            later on over at Taxahaw, which is just a few miles away from there. As
                            a matter of fact, my father went down there and ran it for a short
                            while, and he'd sleep in the back of the store. It was a one-room store.
                            But I remember driving down there many times and looking at it. My
                            father would show it to me. We went all over that country in a horse and
                            buggy in the old days. But the walls were just filled with gunshots.
                                <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> Some of the rowdies at
                            night, especially on the weekends, I presume, would get tanked up with
                            corn liquor. There was nowhere to go and nowhere to let off a little
                            steam, so they'd shoot up the store. He used to tell a lot of stories
                            about what happened down there. That's the only commercial venture that
                            I can recall having heard my father talk about down there in Buford
                            township of Lancaster County, so I think primarily John Shute farmed
                            down there. My father never farmed a day in his life. My grandfather did
                            a little farming, and as his boys grew up he turned his farming
                            operations over to his son who was named Henry Abel Shute. The "Henry"
                            was for his grandfather, and the "Abel" was for his wife's father, Abel
                            Funderburk. The names in the Shute family usually have significance.
                            They're not just selected at random; they're usually connected some
                        way.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I've seen the Funderburk name.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>That's an old German family that came into this part of the country at a
                            very, very early period.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p6" n="6"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Let me ask you another question about the wagon train. When he moved up
                            to Monroe, did your grandfather then have people down in Cheraw and
                            Camden that he could make contact with?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, he had contact, yes, with I think they called them forwarding agents.
                            In other words, they would arrange—as they did not only for him but also
                            for others, too—shipments both ways. Like any transportation even today
                            by air or however, the only profitable transportation is two ways. So
                            those forwarding agents in Cheraw and Camden would arrange and make
                            contact with merchants and others to ship goods, mostly cotton, down the
                            river and to bring supplies back up the river. You can imagine what-all
                            was brought up the river, not only supplies for stores, but this was
                            open country and pioneer country, and they brought in all manner of
                            things: spinning wheels, furniture, almost everything. It was a thriving
                            industry. Then there were companies, primarily in Charleston, that
                            handled the trade from there on up, coastwise shipping. The greatest
                            shipping merchant in Charleston was Henry Laurens. He had a fleet of
                            ships. By the way, Laurens County, South Carolina, is named for him. So
                            these were the contacts that John Shute made, and it worked both ways.
                            Then he had his contacts with merchants in Charlotte and here in Monroe,
                            and he brought their supplies to them, too. It was necessary in those
                            days to have companies like his own, wholesale and retail groceries, to
                            in turn supply these little rural stores, say, twenty by sixty feet, out
                            in the rural areas that furnished the fundamental and basic supplies for
                            farmers. When they got ready to buy things like fertilizer or flour or
                            heavy groceries or farm supplies, they'd come into the store <pb id="p7"
                                n="7"/> with their wagons and load up and carry them back to their
                            little stores. They'd usually buy on credit during the year, and then in
                            the fall when they sold their cotton, which was sold in Monroe, they
                            would pay up their bills and start all over again. That built up Monroe
                            as a trading center at a relatively early period. That's one reason, I'm
                            convinced, that Monroe later became a railroad center, because of the
                            fact that Monroe was the highest cotton market in the country. Not only
                            that, but we had four or five large wholesale grocery stores here. We
                            had a large wholesale hardware. As a matter of fact, we had two that
                            merged just shortly after the turn of the century and formed what is now
                            the Monroe Hardware, which at that time and today is the largest
                            wholesale hardware in the two Carolinas. They had branch warehouses in
                            both states. So this type of thing built Monroe into an early and very
                            successful trading center, and that is responsible for the growth that
                            we had.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4714" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:15:42"/>
                    <milestone n="4105" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:15:43"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I know there were a lot of hogs that were running the woods, especially
                            in the northern townships and part of southern Cabarrus County and
                            Stanly County. I know in a lot of places they'd have hog drives. I'm
                            wondering if this wagon train had anything to do with that hog economy
                            or whether it was completely separate and tied …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>No, I don't think so. I think the development of the swine business was
                            more or less a natural evolution of the average farm. This county was
                            not a large slaveowning county. As a matter of fact, this county, from
                            its inception in 1842 until after World War I, was a pauper county. We
                            received more aid from the state and federal government than we paid
                            back to those two agencies in taxes. <pb id="p8" n="8"/> Consequently,
                            our farms were operated by the families that lived there and not by
                            slaves. The larger each farm grew, the more people it took to operate
                            them, and that's one of the reasons we had such large families. The
                            other one was biological. But these farms were self-contained. They
                            raised their own corn and wheat for their flour and meal. They raised
                            their swine and their chickens for their meat. As soon as the first
                            frost came, that was the time to slaughter pigs and hogs. They would
                            render their own lard; they'd make their own soap; they'd make their own
                            sausage; they'd cure their own hams. Every house had a smokehouse.
                            They'd burn hickory logs to cure the ham, and that ham was salted down
                            along with the other. The sausage was put up in corn shucks. And you
                            talk about something good to eat. Now you take sausage out of a corn
                            shuck six months later with fresh eggs, and you've really got a
                            breakfast. But as towns developed, they usually enacted ordinances
                            prohibiting the raising of hogs or swine within the city limits. They
                            had to permit cows, because they had to have their milk and butter.
                            Almost every house had to have a cow. But the swine they outlawed
                            because of sanitary reasons and other reasons, too. Consequently, you
                            can see how it would develop as a separate industry located out where it
                            was not offensive to anyone. You had what later became known, oddly
                            enough, as "pig parlors." That's where they raised them and would
                            slaughter them and cure them and everything. So that developed the swine
                            business as really a separate industry from ordinary farming. But even
                            so, every farm still had swine. And oddly enough, we didn't raise any
                            beef cattle to speak of back then. We could graze our cattle twelve
                            months a year, and the land was cheap; <pb id="p9" n="9"/> it would have
                            been an ideal industry for us to have gone into, but we never did for
                            some reason. And our proximity to Charlotte. I never could understand
                            why we didn't build up a great dairying business in this county. But we
                            didn't. Everybody, though, had a cow.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4105" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:19:56"/>
                    <milestone n="4715" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:19:57"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>In that connection, did you ever hear of John J. Hasty? He was sheriff at
                            one time and had been a stock dealer.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Hasty was the leading Republican figure in this county. His son, Herndon
                            Hasty, later worked at the Monroe Hardware and the post office. You see,
                            back in those days most of your postal officials, your civil servants,
                            were Republicans, for obvious reasons. The national government was
                            Republican. Hasty was the sheriff, and a very good sheriff, I
                            understand. That was before my day. I don't personally remember anything
                            about him. I know who he is, of course. Herndon, his son, was a very
                            popular man. He graduated from the University of North Carolina, where
                            he was a very famous baseball player, and played semi-pro ball after he
                            came back home. He was influential in forming a small semi-professional
                            league in this part of the country, and he played on it, too. As a
                            matter of fact, I was mascot of that team in 1908.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Let's go back to the railroad. You said when the railroad came through,
                            that destroyed the wagon trade.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>That's right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What, then, did John Shute …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>He concentrated then on his numerous enterprises here in Monroe and his
                            store. It was a tremendous store. They did a tremendous business. The
                            ceiling was about twenty feet high. It was an arcade <pb id="p10" n="10"
                            /> building with entrances on Hayne and Franklin Streets, with the Bank
                            of Union in the corner. But I've seen that store packed to that extent
                            with flour. My father ran the store for his father, and all of these
                            enterprises of John Shute's operated under the name "J. Shute and Sons."
                            Unfortunately, a historical report in the form of a book made the
                            mistake of referring to this operation as "J. T. Shute and Sons." That
                            was in error, and it's unfortunate that Mary Ann Lee, who's now
                            deceased, put this error into her book, and it was picked up by the
                            paper. This was last year. I corrected it with a letter to the editor,
                            but it's still in print as "J. T. Shute and Sons," which is most
                            unfortunate because it was "J. Shute and Sons," John Shute and Sons. J.
                            T. Shute was the youngest son of John Shute, but he never built a
                            building downtown in his life, and there never was a "J. T. Shute and
                            Sons." But after the wagon trains, he had developed so many other things
                            and had acquired so much property that he was kept busy right on. For a
                            while, after the railroad came, he was in competition. You see, the
                            first railroad came from Wilmington to Monroe and then up to Charlotte.
                            There was a branch that was put in up to Charlotte and eventually up as
                            far as Rutherfordton. The idea originally, I think, was to go into
                            Asheville, but the cost of building railroads through the mountains was
                            so expensive that that line never did go beyond Rutherfordton. Then
                            later the Georgia-Carolina came in from Atlanta, and they were joined
                            together and merged into what became known as the Seaboard Airline
                            Railway. Then that wound up the whole thing. You see, the Seaboard not
                            only ran from up here to Wilmington, which was a port, but it had a
                            branch that branched off <pb id="p11" n="11"/> from that line and went
                            through Raleigh and Norlina, and it divided again and went into Norfolk,
                            which was another seaport. Then going south from Hamlet, the Seaboard
                            went through Columbia and down to Savannah, which was still another
                            seaport. That was the idea, to get to the sea. So the Seaboard actually
                            had two very important ports, Savannah and Norfolk, with a secondary
                            port at Wilmington. Wilmington was not a good port. If it had been, we'd
                            have built a great seaport there instead of at Charleston in the early
                            days of the Carolinas.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Was he involved in cotton shipping at the cotton platform?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Not at the cotton platform. The cotton platform was not a facility that
                            bought and sold cotton. It was the official weight station of the
                            county. That was owned and operated by the county. Now there was and
                            is—it doesn't function anymore—a Union County Cotton Warehouse, which
                            was a separate corporation, and they stored cotton. But we had cotton
                            buyers—they were called brokers—all over Monroe. You'd come up here in
                            the fall of the year, and you couldn't drive a buggy or later a car up
                            Hayne Street or Jefferson or Franklin Streets or this Windsor Street
                            because of the cotton wagons. I mean they just choked the thoroughfares.
                            Well, those buyers would give a man a bid on his cotton. If it was
                            accepted, he gave him a ticket. He took that ticket and his bales of
                            cotton to the cotton platform. There it was officially weighed, and the
                            cotton weigher was an official of the county. He got the correct weight
                            and left the cotton there in the name of this buyer who had bought it
                            and got a <pb id="p12" n="12"/> certified ticket for the weight. Then
                            that cotton was picked up by the Cotton Warehouse Company and stored as
                            the property of the buyer that bought it and would be moved about and
                            shipped and this, that, and the other on orders from the buyers. Then
                            the farmer would go back to the man that bought it with his ticket and
                            get a check. That was the function of the cotton platform. In the fall
                            of the year, it was filled with cotton. They couldn't move it into the
                            warehouse fast enough to keep the platform pretty well open, so that
                            whole area out there was always choked up with wagons. That was on
                            Planter Street.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I've got a picture I'll show you sometime that was taken in 1902.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I forget which street it was on, but it showed the cotton platform and
                            then the line of wagons …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>… going off in the distance.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I've seen lines of cotton a mile long. Yeah.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Now is that when the farmers would then buy a lot of their goods?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, yes, they'd take those cotton checks as a rule and go to the
                            wholesaler that had been supplying them through the year and pay up his
                            bills. That'd be his first thing. The second thing they'd do, his family
                            nearly always came to town with him when he brought his cotton, and they
                            would do their shopping. The womenfolks would buy piece goods and
                            buttons and thread and needles and things that were needed around the
                            home. Later they'd go to the store and <pb id="p13" n="13"/> buy what
                            was called fancy groceries. This would be a small amount of jarred and
                            canned pickles in jars and jellies, not many, because most of that stuff
                            was done at home, the canning and things like that. But then this farmer
                            would put in, usually, in those first checks—the first loads that he'd
                            bring in—supplies that he needed like flour and coffee and salt and
                            sugar and staples. He would buy those there, and Monroe became quite a
                            trading center. We had some large stores here.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>So that's when J. Shute and Sons would do a lot of its business.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, yes, yes. Yes, indeed. We became the largest store of its kind in
                            Monroe.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What were some of the other businesses?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Besides the groceries and hardware?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>You had four livery stables. That was a big business back then. And
                            adjacent to all the livery stables, you had blacksmiths' shops. That was
                            an important thing, too, far more so than just shoeing horses and mules.
                            They also repaired wagons and buggies and things like that. All the
                            livery stables sold wagons and buggies. Then you had another industry
                            called harness making, which was quite a big thing because every horse
                            and mule had to have a set of harness. More than one set, because the
                            draft animals would use one set of harness for draft work, and then when
                            they were changed to a light wagon or a buggy you'd use an entirely
                            different set of harness for that. That was a big industry, too. And
                            that in turn backed up the <pb id="p14" n="14"/> farmer …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>[END OF TAPE 1, SIDE A]</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                </div2>
                <div2 id="tape1-b" n="1-B" type="tape_side">
                    <head>[TAPE 1, SIDE B]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 1, SIDE B]</p>
                    </note>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>The farmers had to raise the feedstuffs for these livery stables. These
                            were tremendous operations. It was so involved. You not only had the
                            sale of horses and mules. You had the blacksmiths' shops, which were
                            necessary; you had the harness makers, which were necessary; you had the
                            financial part of it. Most of the livery stables financed their own
                            sales. Then they sold buggies, and we got to the point in Monroe where
                            we manufactured our own buggies and we manufactured our own wagons. We
                            had the Cotton States Wagon Company, we had the Piedmont Buggy Company,
                            and it was a rather involved thing, a never-ending thing, you might say.
                            That was probably the peak of that type of economy in American life.
                            This was with the coming of the railroad and then a quarter of a century
                            later the introduction of the gasoline engine, the automobile, into the
                            American economy, and you had a gradual and constantly accelerating
                            evolution of what we called the mechanical age, as distinct from the
                            industrial age. Monroe was here at the peak of the draft animal period
                            and the horsepower setup. But, as I say, it was just so involved; one
                            thing was dependent upon another, and our whole economy was based on, I
                            reckon you'd call it, this agrarian and rural type of living.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4715" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:32:10"/>
                    <milestone n="4106" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:32:11"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>You mentioned something that I want to find out a little more about, and
                            that's financing, how that was done.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p15" n="15"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Nearly every stable had a bookkeeper, who was what we today probably
                            would call a sharpie. I mean he handled all the business transactions.
                            The salesman would sell the horse or the mule, usually. Say, for
                            example, he was sold for three hundred dollars, but maybe the farmer
                            didn't have but twenty-five dollars in cash. Then he would take a note
                            for the difference. They'd work the interest out, and the method of
                            payment. These payments, obviously, were not monthly payments, because
                            the farmer's income is not monthly income; it's annual income. So these
                            were usually arranged in terms of what he had planted and what today
                            we'd call crop loans, like the Piedmont Production Credit and other
                            agencies handle today. The livery stable quite often would take a
                            mortgage, not only on the mule that it sold, but quite often on the
                            crop, too. These notes sometimes would extend over a two- or three-year
                            period. They'd work all that out with the farmer, and then he would give
                            his note. And, oddly enough, in those days credit was not very risky.
                            The old saying that "A man's word is his bond" was more truth than
                            poetry. And when a man shook hands with you and promised to do
                            something, the chances were about ninety-nine to one that he'd do it if
                            it was humanly possible to do it. And if it wasn't, he'd go to you like
                            a man and tell you why he couldn't do it. So business was based upon
                            that, and there wasn't too much loss on credit. There was some, of
                            course, because some people just naturally couldn't operate their farms
                            in a businesslike way and would go broke, and there was nothing that
                            could be done about it. So in those cases, there would be a loss
                            involved, as a rule; sometimes there wouldn't be. Not only <pb id="p16"
                                n="16"/> that, but there would be crop failures. I mean, after all,
                            we didn't have a very highly developed agricultural setup in these
                            counties back then. In this county, for instance, the primary crops were
                            cotton and corn. You had to have the corn to feed the mules to raise the
                            cotton. That was about the cycle that was operated.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Did financing …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>There was very little of it done at banks. The banks offered credit, and
                            the more affluent farmers, the larger farmers, a lot of them would go to
                            the bank and borrow the money because they found it was cheaper because
                            they could get it at a lower rate of interest. But the banks primarily
                            financed the stores, the merchants, who in turn extended credit to the
                            farmers. That was the cycle.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4106" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:35:15"/>
                    <milestone n="4716" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:35:16"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What were the interest rates?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>In those days? It would run around anywhere from six to eight
                        percent.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>That was from a grocer to a farmer?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>No, no, those rates would run higher than that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I see.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>They'd run higher. They'd run nearer ten percent, quite often. It would
                            depend on the community and what the margin of profit on the commodity
                            was at that time. But it would run a little higher.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I know that there were several men in town who were worth a great deal of
                            money and, for example, bought the bonds on the courthouse in 1886.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p17" n="17"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>How did they handle that money? What kind of things did they put it in,
                            and what would they do with it?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>You mean what would they invest their money in?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4716" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:36:10"/>
                    <milestone n="4107" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:36:11"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>The opportunity for investment has always been available in America. Most
                            of the local men of affluence in Union County would put their money into
                            personal loans and into real estate, the development of real estate,
                            rental property, and things like that. There wasn't too much investment
                            in stocks and bonds, unless they were local in nature. You mentioned the
                            courthouse. That would not be considered an unusual thing to happen at
                            all. Then as we later developed a few small industries, stocks were
                            purchased by people who were able to. But mostly it was in the form of
                            personal loans and development of local investment opportunities in real
                            estate and farming. And a lot of these fellows would finance
                            sharecroppers, where they would furnish the money to buy fertilizers and
                            the seed and stuff like that, and the farmer out there with the land and
                            the livestock and the labor would furnish the other. They'd usually work
                            this out on sharecropping, usually a fifty-fifty basis, which was a good
                            investment, apparently, for both parties. This was particularly true
                            immediately following the Civil War, when the slaves were emancipated,
                            in the South. This was not so much true here, where there was a minimum
                            number of slaves, but throughout the South, the tenant farming, the
                            sharecropper, was the only economic system that would work. People don't
                            realize that; they frown upon it today, and indeed they should, because
                            it's something that's outlived its time. But after the War, there was no
                            money in <pb id="p18" n="18"/> this part of the country. Consequently,
                            the great landowners had the land, the slaves were unemployed with
                            nowhere to live, and it was perfectly natural that the two would
                            combine. One would furnish the land, the other the labor, and they'd
                            share in the proceeds from it. This developed until later, as the little
                            farmer arose, he carried it a step further with the man that would
                            furnish the money and let him be the manager. Rather than tenant
                            farming, we called it sharecropping. But that was a perfectly natural
                            thing to occur. People don't seem to realize it today; they're too far
                            away from reality. But it was the only system that would have worked in
                            the South after the War.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4107" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:39:04"/>
                    <milestone n="4717" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:39:05"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>About the time that we're talking about here in the 1870's and '80's and
                            '90's, a lot of the counties in the Piedmont went to the legislature and
                            got various kinds of fence laws and stock laws passed.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you have any sense of what the purpose behind those was?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, As we developed more cattle… That would be your swine; you were
                            referring to that, and to the mules and horses. We didn't raise any
                            mules and horses to speak of in this part of the country. It was mostly
                            cows and swine. In the old days, we raised sheep. We don't raise any
                            anymore, commercially, but we used to in the old days. Not having been a
                            farmer, I don't have firsthand information, but the fencing laws created
                            a great deal of antagonism between the dirt farmers that didn't raise
                            cattle and those who did. The ones that raised cattle felt like the open
                            land—out west they <pb id="p19" n="19"/> called it open range—was more
                            or less like the New England common where everybody could carry their
                            cows and graze them on the common, usually in the center of town. Out
                            west it was using the great tracts of open land that were more or less
                            free grazing ground for the cattle people. Well, the poor devil that
                            happened to have a farm, they would just eat his corn and everything
                            else up. So eventually it got to where he was building fences to keep
                            the cattle out. And that was the whole thing. In this country it applied
                            to smaller farms, to truck farming, vegetables and corn. The biggest
                            thing would be corn and small grain that the hogs and the cows and the
                            horses and mules would naturally eat up if they weren't kept away from
                            it. So fences were put up to keep them out. This antagonized the people
                            that had the animals, and this sort of thing went on for years until we
                            outgrew it. But it never was a serious thing in this part of the
                            country. It was serious to them at the time, but I mean it was nothing
                            like the great range wars of the West where people were actually killed
                            defending their point of view.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4717" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:41:48"/>
                    <milestone n="4108" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:41:49"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>About that time, too, the county government especially began to
                            reorganize the system of building roads …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right, right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>… and a lot of people would come and petition to have a private road
                            declared a public road.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>And then you could call people out for a two-mile radius along the road
                            to work on it. Do you have any sense of how the <pb id="p20" n="20"/>
                            merchants in town felt about that?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>The merchants were in favor of roads and good roads—all-weather roads,
                            they were called—where the farmer could bring his cotton to town to the
                            market and carry his supplies back without getting hub-deep in mud in
                            the wintertime and covered with dust in the summertime. But the road
                            business reflects the history of a county and a community. Later on,
                            after the state highway system was developed, you can tell the counties
                            that had members of the State Highway Commission, because they had more
                            good roads emanating from their county seats out into rural areas to
                            bring those people into, say, Wadesboro instead of Monroe. You had that
                            sort of thing, which I presume was more or less natural. But the
                            building of roads is in itself a special field of study that would be
                            very good for somebody to get into. It went through an evolutionary
                            period. First were the landowners themselves. Said Bill, "Let's improve
                            the road by your farm and mine to the church." And their sons and they
                            would go out and work up a fairly passable road. They ran into problems
                            when they got to streams, because they didn't know too much about
                            bridge-building. They usually had fords. Then that went on, and then Tom
                            Jones on the other side of the church decided, "Is it all right if I
                            extend this road down across my property? I'll, of course, keep it up."
                            Yeah, it was all right, unless he was a bad character, and that wouldn't
                            be often. So this sort of thing. You developed a bunch of purely private
                            roads, you might say. Then later on, this thought was extended by these
                            people who were maintaining the roads going before the county <pb
                                id="p21" n="21"/> commissioners and asking for financial help. Maybe
                            they'd give them a couple hundred dollars to keep up a certain piece of
                            road. There was a period when each man was required to keep up the road
                            in front of his own property. It went through that period, which seems
                            logical enough. You run into the question of children growing up and
                            marrying and moving away, and the old man and his wife being left there
                            with the responsibility of maintaining a road, which he was no longer
                            physically able to do, and he'd have to go out and hire somebody to do
                            it. Then it became a hardship, you see. There were so many problems like
                            that that arose that you pretty soon developed the desire to have the
                            county take over all public roads, so they established what was called a
                            road commission on a countywide basis. The county took over certain
                            numbers of the roads; some of them they didn't. They would come before
                            the commissioners and apply for their road to be taken over as a public
                            road. In the early days, we had chain gangs. These prisons were operated
                            by the county, and they called it that because the convicts that
                            received sentences had chains that went down to their ankles from their
                            waists to keep them from running away. In the early days, these members
                            of the chain gang were required to work on these county roads. That's
                            where the labor came from. There was a superintendent of roads under the
                            county road commission who had charge of these workers, and they had
                            guards with rifles. You probably have seen pictures of them. It's rather
                            pathetic thing, in a way, and there were a lot of people… I remember, as
                            a young man, one friend of mine particularly. As we would be riding out
                            in the country, we would <pb id="p22" n="22"/> pass, maybe, a gang of
                            these fellows working on the road. He was a person who smoked
                            cigarettes. He would always reach in his pocket and get his pack of
                            cigarettes and throw it out to these convicts, every time he'd pass
                            them. It struck me as a rather humane sort of an attitude to establish
                            towards these people. They had no chance to buy cigarettes, because they
                            had no money. But that was the way the road system worked in the early
                            period, and then the evolution from that phase into a state highway
                            system came along, and then you went through it on a statewide basis.
                            For a long period of time, North Carolina was known as "The Good Roads
                            State," because it was the first state ever to float a bond issue of the
                            magnitude that we did. It seems to me like it was $400 million dollars,
                            which was almost an unheard of amount of money, that the state floated
                            bonds for to build. The idea was to connect every county seat in North
                            Carolina with an all-weather road, usually paved. The first chairman of
                            the highway commission was a fellow Page from down in Moore County, who
                            later was associated with the Page Trust Company. That was a banking
                            chain that was wiped out in the Great Depression. Just like the state
                            school system that Governor Aycock established, the road system achieved
                            national importance because it was significant, I mean the extent to
                            which we went into it. The evolution of the highway system in North
                            Carolina would make an excellent study for some student getting a
                            master's degree, to have a study in depth of the system itself, because
                            it's a fascinating thing. And as roads are built, communities develop.
                            Transportation is the life of trade, both local and otherwise, so these
                            roads became quite important.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4108" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:48:52"/>
                    <milestone n="4718" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:48:53"/>
                    <pb id="p23" n="23"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>One thing I noticed in looking through some of the records was that about
                            the same time a lot of these roads were being built, a lot of times
                            where there was a crossroad of these public roads, two things would
                            happen. One, the local people, especially large landowners, would get
                            together and whatever small merchants happened to be in the area, and
                            get the polling place moved to that crossroads.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>That's correct.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Then they'd go get the common school. If they could pick it up and move
                            it, they'd move it, and if not, they'd build another one, but they'd
                            have to go to the commissioners to get permission to do it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>That's correct.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you remember these kind of trading centers, where they would be?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, sure, sure. They developed far beyond that point in the early days of
                            the telephone. They'd put in an exchange. You'd have to holler yourself
                            sick to get to some of these rural exchanges. But you take communities
                            like, say, Olive Branch way up in the northeastern part of this county,
                            or the little crossroads up the Concord road called Brief. These little
                            places had telephone exchanges, and they were tremendously important,
                            especially in terms of law enforcement, reaching doctors for medical
                            assistance, for fires and the sheriff's office and all this, that, and
                            the other. Prior to the coming of the telephone, which was quite an
                            event, most of the counties were organized into townships. This county
                            had nine; it still does. They're not significant now, but in the <pb
                                id="p24" n="24"/> old days they were quite significant. Every
                            township, for instance, had a constable. He was the head of the law
                            enforcement in that township. He could deputize people. And every
                            township had a justice of the peace. He could hold court, and he had
                            jurisdiction up to two hundred dollars in civil action, and he had the
                            power of referring cases to higher courts, usually the county court,
                            which we called, in this county, the recorder's court because the
                            presiding judge was called a recorder. You had this organization by
                            townships. During the Civil War, for example, the levies for troops were
                            made on a township basis. They would allocate, say, fifty volunteers or
                            conscripted young men between certain ages for Buford Township or Goose
                            Creek or whatever. So that was the important thing. Then the township
                            maintained the voting precinct where you went to vote. You also went
                            there to list your taxes. All of these things were done on a township
                            basis. But with the coming of the telephone and good roads, you can
                            readily see why this would pass out of existence. There are many
                            students of political history who believe that perhaps we have reached a
                            point now where we need to reconsider the importance of counties in the
                            same light as we once did the townships. With the highly centralized
                            state government and the ever-expanding urban centers, and the fact that
                            the state for the first time now has the majority of its population
                            classified as urban rather than rural inhabitants, maybe the time has
                            come when you don't need county government anymore. Most of your
                            courthouses are self-supporting. The fees that they receive for
                            recording documents and fines and forfeitures and other sources of
                            income in practically every county in the state are sufficient to pay
                                <pb id="p25" n="25"/> the expenses of the clerk of court and the
                            registrar of deeds and the other officials that are employed in
                            connection with the courthouse. The state more and more is taking over
                            more and more authority. You've got your State Highway Patrol, and
                            you've got now this new form of regionalism, which is a highly
                            questionable thing, incidentally, in my opinion, because it bypasses
                            local government. You may have reached the point where this needs to be
                            considered, that you'd have one local government unit—it could be a
                            combination of city and county—one state government, and one federal
                            government. There are many people, students whose opinions are quite
                            valuable, who believe we might have reached that point now.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Let me go back to the township organization for a minute. It sounds to me
                            like a lot of these townships were organized into neighborhoods which
                            are centered around a particular church, and sometimes the large
                            landowners also happened to be elders of these churches.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What can you remember about that, and how do you think that changed and
                            when?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>All communities, in my opinion, are dependent upon transportation. You
                            will notice, if you go back far enough in any area, that with the coming
                            of the railroad, for example, people tended to move from strictly rural
                            settlements, maybe around a church, which in turn would cause a country
                            store to be located. These people would build for their sons and
                            daughters up near the railroad. In a <pb id="p26" n="26"/> community
                            like Marshville, for instance, the original community at Marshville was
                            about four miles south of where the town is now, and it was called
                            Gilboa, named after the church there. When the railroad came through,
                            these people simply moved to where the transportation was. They could
                            get their fertilizer for their farm by rail or they could ship their
                            cotton by rail, which was a much simpler thing to do. This happened in
                            Marshville, in Wingate. Meadow Branch eventually became Wingate, named
                            for the college, which in turn was named for the daughter of the
                            president of Wake Forest and not the president himself, as most people
                            think. Wingate was not named for him; it was named for his daughter. The
                            reason for that was that the chairman of the committee to select a name
                            was in love with his daughter, and he afterwards, incidentally, became
                            president of Clemson College. He was a Monroe native, by the way. His
                            name was Sikes. But coming back to the movement of people, they tended
                            to move toward the sources of transportation. The railroads built these
                            cities, these towns. Then the state highway system came very near
                            destroying them and, as a matter of fact, did destroy many, many rural
                            communities, because then they moved to the highway like they used to
                            move to the railroad. Unless the highway happened to be parallel to the
                            railroad, like it is from here to Waxhaw and from here to Marshville,
                            where the road and the railroad are together, it quite often meant the
                            loss of the importance of the rail center, especially after the trucking
                            business grew. The people moved to the road, to the highway, and schools
                            and churches and all were built on the highway, because that's what the
                            people used <pb id="p27" n="27"/> to get there, and you had another
                            shift. This created problems all around for the rural churches and the
                            stores and schools. After they got to building permanent schools out of
                            brick, they weren't movable like they used to be when a fellow would
                            give a piece of land and quite often the timber off his land to build a
                            little one-room school. This was particularly true in terms of the black
                            schools, because he could get better tenants if he had schools on his
                            property. Invariably, he'd give this deed to the county board of
                            education or the commissioners. It would always have a reversionary
                            clause in it that when it ceased being used for a school, the title
                            would revert to the donor. You had that sort of thing, too. But I would
                            say that the development of the rural community is the direct result of
                            the means of transportation. This would apply to water courses as well
                            as to railroads and roads. That's the reason your early towns were built
                            on water courses, because this was their highway, their means of
                        moving.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>The churches remind me of one other thing I wanted to ask about, and
                            that's the movements to control liquor trade and traffic in the
                        saloons.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I don't reckon we'll ever solve that intellectually. We go through
                            cycles. I remember my father saying that in his home—and the home still
                            stands up here, over a hundred years old—they always had a quart of fine
                            whiskey on the mantelpiece, and that was for the preacher. When the
                            preacher came around, especially in the winter in the cold, wet days
                            when he was making his call, you always fixed the preacher a toddy. I
                            often wondered, on these winter days when it was real cold and he made a
                            lot of calls, what shape he was in <pb id="p28" n="28"/> when he got
                            home. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> But this was not frowned
                            on at all. I mean it was taken just as literally as today we offer
                            people a… They'd always give him a toddy, and there was nothing
                            considered. But especially in the Methodist Church, which has always
                            been a very popular church in this part of the country… The Baptists are
                            first, but the Methodists ran them a close second in some areas. Monroe
                            was always considered a Methodist island in a sea of Baptists. There
                            came along some leaders, chief of which was Bishop Cammon, in the
                            Methodist Church that became quite interested in the question of
                            whiskey. The Methodist Church went through a period—maybe all Protestant
                            churches did—where they began to think that anything that gave people
                            pleasure had to be a sin, and for that reason drinking, dancing, playing
                            cards, going to the movies …</p>
                    </sp>

                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>[END OF TAPE 1, SIDE B]</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                </div2>
                <div2 id="tape2-a" n="2-A" type="tape_side">
                    <head>[TAPE 2, SIDE A]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 2, SIDE A]</p>
                    </note>

                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>… went through a period of total abstinence, where it was considered
                            sinful to drink whiskey at all. Then the Anti-Saloon League, with people
                            like Carrie Nation and the others on a national basis, eventually
                            exerted enough political pressure first, to abolish the saloon, to
                            replace it with a dispensary. As the name implied, they dispensed
                            alcoholic liquor on medical certificates and things like that. Then when
                            the First World War conscripted millions of young Americans, the people
                            that did most of the drinking, and they got them out of circulation,
                            they had an <pb id="p29" n="29"/> election, and then Volstead passed his
                            act through Congress and made it illegal to manufacture, transport, or
                            use alcoholic beverages. That wiped everything out and created a lot of
                            criminal millionaires among the bootleggers. This went on in a rather
                            ridiculous manner until Roosevelt became President. First Al Smith ran
                            on a ticket to abolish the Volstead Act. He was defeated because he was
                            Catholic, not because he had that point of view. Then Roosevelt was
                            elected, and he immediately had the Supreme Court rule that 3.2 beer was
                            not an alcoholic drink. This was followed by the abolition of the
                            Volstead Act and the creation of state ABC stores, which seems to be a
                            very practical way to handle it. I don't think we've seen the increase
                            in drinking commensurate with the states that have legal whiskey and
                            those, like Kansas, that still outlaw the sale of whiskey.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>In the mid-1880's, the county commissioners got the law changed by the
                            General Assembly so that saloonkeepers here in Monroe had to have a
                            recommendation through the freeholders. What that meant, as far as I can
                            tell, is that the set of men that had been saloonkeepers before were
                            gone, and they were replaced by a set of men connected with merchants in
                            Monroe, one of whom was John Shute.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>He became what today we would call a member of the city council. I think
                            back then they called them commissioners. Then at one time they called
                            them aldermen; when I was mayor, we had a board of aldermen. But yes, he
                            took an active part in nearly everything, as far as I'm able to
                            determine from the information within the family that I have.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p30" n="30"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you have any idea why they wanted to control it that way?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I don't know. There was a natural resentment. I think this was more
                            manifest immediately after the Civil War than any other time. In this
                            part of the country, there was an evident distaste for any type of
                            federal tax. This was true particularly in regard to whiskey and
                            tobacco. Tobacco stamps used to be put on the wooden boxes that held
                            plug tobacco, for example. That was the big tobacco item. There were no
                            cigarettes back then, and very little cigars. There were a few cheroots,
                            so-called; they were handmade, rather rough-type cigars. Mostly plug
                            tobacco, and nearly everybody chewed. My father chewed tobacco. You'd
                            never know it unless you could see him sometimes, which was very seldom,
                            expectorate. But those boxes that held the plug tobacco had the federal
                            stamps—they were narrow blue stamps—stripped down the side. Father said
                            that he knew practically all of the rural merchants. After they'd sell
                            that box of tobacco down to just a plug or two, they would then, instead
                            of going to the post office and buying new stamps to go on a new box of
                            tobacco, do one of two things. They'd either fill up that empty box with
                            tobacco, using the same stamp, or they'd soak that stamp off and put it
                            on another box. That was a common practice. I'm sure this was also true
                            with barrels of whiskey, where the stamps were on the exterior of the
                            barrel. The resentment. I presume that the federal government put so
                            much pressure on the states, and the states in turn on the counties,
                            about the liquor tax and tobacco tax. This was the main source of
                            income, when you stop to think that neither the federal government nor
                            the state had income taxes or sales <pb id="p31" n="31"/> taxes or
                            anything like that. All of their taxable income came from duties and
                            things like that, commodity taxes. I expect that was the reason, that
                            some of these saloonkeepers had been cheating so notoriously, that led
                            to a reform like that. Then there could be other reasons, too, that we
                            probably know nothing about, of a local nature. I know that the last
                            dispensary that was up there on the corner of Church and Franklin was
                            run by L. N. Presson in Monroe, who was the most saintly member of the
                            Central Methodist Church that there was. He was just the essence of
                            gentility and religious life, a man that never took a drink in his life,
                            never smoked, certainly never used profanity. I mean he was just that
                            sort of person. He and his wife taught a Sunday school class for
                            twenty-five or thirty years, and he was just that kind of person. And
                            yet, there he was, manager of the liquor dispensary, and he was the last
                            one, incidentally. Very few people in Monroe today know that, but that's
                            a fact.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4718" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="01:07:30"/>
                    <milestone n="4109" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="01:07:31"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Let's move on to about 1900. I guess 1900 was the reestablishment of the
                            Democratic Party, really the establishment of progressive government
                            programs and reorganization of government in this state.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>The Democrats took over from the Populists. In 1898, our congressman from
                            this district was a Populist. He was a Baptist preacher from
                        Polkton.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What was his name?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I don't recall. I ought to, but I don't. Incidentally, when the Populists
                            tried to come back and they saw the wave of the <pb id="p32" n="32"/>
                            future, they tried to come in the Democratic Party, and the Democrats
                            wouldn't permit them to come back in. That's what created the
                            significant Republican Party in North Carolina.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What did the general political change mean for Union County?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>We adjusted to it, of course. We had no choice, really. But we turned
                            toward the Democratic Party in preference to the Republican Party, I
                            presume because of the fact that there were still at that time thousands
                            of Confederate veterans in this county. They influenced politics much
                            more so than we realize and did up until World War I. The Confederate
                            veteran's opinion was always sought, and he was a leader in his
                            community. Most of them were rural people. If you were running for
                            office, you always went to these leaders in the rural areas, and
                            invariably back then they would be the Confederate veterans. I think it
                            was perfectly natural in this particular community that we would become
                            Democratic rather than Republican, because the Republican to us was a
                            new thing, and it had the taint of Populism, which almost overnight had
                            become very unpopular.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4109" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="01:10:12"/>
                    <milestone n="4719" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="01:10:13"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you remember anything about the building of the UDC<gap
                                reason="missing"/> Monument in front of the courthouse? Were you old
                            enough to remember that?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I don't remember the actual building of it. I remember more Decoration
                            Day every year. The UDC's would decorate it with bunting and flags and
                            flowers, and they'd always have some outstanding person—the Governor, if
                            possible—deliver a speech there, and everybody would go. That was a big
                            thing, and it was centered around that monument.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p33" n="33"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>You were born in what year?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>In January of 1904.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What was it like growing up in Monroe?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>It was very pleasant. It was a good town to grow up in. Life was slow and
                            easy, friendly. There were no social problems that were of any
                            significance, and there was no bustle and hurry of the larger city.
                            Everybody knew everybody, and life was good. People trusted each other,
                            and the little spats that the womenfolk quite often would have, and some
                            men, as a rule didn't amount to too much. They were not too serious.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What kinds of things did you do?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Almost everything. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> Nothing that
                            was really bad. We played a lot of games. Baseball was quite popular. We
                            hadn't graduated into tennis yet—that came later—but horseshoes,
                            buckety-buck, all sorts of games and things. Later, outdoor basketball
                            in the schools. We had courts outdoors; they didn't have any gymnasia
                            back in those days. Some track, but that was usually an annual event in
                            the spring of the year, and all the county schools would participate in
                            track meets. They were well attended, too. But as a young boy, we shot
                            marbles and had tops and things like that. We didn't have any mechanical
                            toys to speak of like trains and things. We had trains, but they were
                            cast iron; the wheels didn't turn. It was just something to look at, you
                            might say. Had that sort of toys. But the tricycle was an important
                            vehicle that the more affluent families could afford to buy for their
                            children. Nearly all the boys in our neighborhood had tricycles that
                            we'd ride, and the girls <pb id="p34" n="34"/> could ride them, too.
                            Then later on, as you got older, the bicycle itself came along, so you
                            were getting along when you got a bicycle that you could ride to school.
                            Everybody wanted to ride it. Life was easy, gentle, and friendly. No
                            evidence of discrimination and segregation, as we envision them today.
                            My home was on the corner of Church and Talleyrand—it was called Bryant
                            Street then—but I spent nearly as much time in the home of our cook, who
                            had boys my age. We'd slip off and go swimming together. Never thought
                            anything of it until after we got into school, and the teachers told us
                            it was wrong. I often wonder what would have happened if they hadn't
                            paid any more attention to it than we did. I don't think we ever would
                            have had any racial problems. And the same way with trains. This Jim
                            Crow business was a latecomer, too. You didn't use to have that. You
                            didn't have areas segregated black and white and this, that, and the
                            other in the early days. The idea of segregation, I think, was more of a
                            northern phenomenon than it was southern. Eventually, it came here, too.
                            But coming back to the other part of it, everybody went to church, men,
                            women, and children. We also went to Sunday school. We also went to
                            prayer meeting on Wednesday night, and they usually had pretty good
                            attendance. You see, there was so little to do in the way of
                            entertainment. In 1898 J. Shute and Sons built the Opera House, and that
                            afforded outside entertainers maybe an average of once a month during
                            the year. When you had things like that, just like when John Robinson's
                            Circus came to town every year, everybody went. There was no trouble
                            about getting attendance; everybody went. We never were large enough to
                            have Al G. Fields' Minstrels. They came <pb id="p35" n="35"/> to
                            Charlotte, but they didn't come to Monroe. But we did have Weber and
                            Fields, who afterwards became national comedians. They were here in
                            Monroe. And Thomas Dixon's "Klansman" was shown here with a horse on the
                            stage. That fascinated all of us. He came out and talked during
                            intermission. He was a young writer back then. But it was pleasant. I
                            enjoyed it. The Fourth of July was the big day of the year. We didn't
                            shoot firecrackers much at the Fourth of July; we did that at Christmas.
                            But we had firecrackers. T. P. Dillon always was chairman of the
                            committee to run the Fourth of July. He'd have fireworks that night. But
                            that's when we had the big local parade, and they were fantastic, too.
                            It had every category you could think of: bicycle competition, floats,
                            bands, and just every sort of thing. The parades would be long, and
                            everybody in the county would come to Monroe to see the Fourth of July
                            parade. You just wouldn't dare miss that. We'd look forward to that for
                            months. But it was pleasant. We didn't have much, but we didn't require
                            too much, and it was all right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>When did you start to school?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I started to school in the fall of 1910.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Was it a common school?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>No, that was Monroe Graded School. That was set up in 1900. We had a
                            boarding academy here before that. They had a fire, and I think three of
                            the students were burned to death. I went through graded school and two
                            years of high school. Then I went to Georgia Military Academy, and I
                            graduated down there.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What was the classroom day like in the graded school? What kinds of
                            things did you do?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p36" n="36"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>We'd do a lot of the things that they do today, I presume. It would
                            depend on the period where you were, whether you were at the age when
                            you went out in the woods and gathered colored leaves and made displays
                            out of those, and then there was a period where the colored crayon came
                            into prominence, and you'd draw things and have collections of drawings,
                            and then you'd have clippings out of magazines and papers and things.
                            The teacher was usually fairly well trained, not like they are today;
                            some teachers probably had never been to college themselves. There was
                            no central heating. There was a pot-bellied stove in every room, and a
                            couple of boys would be appointed each week or month to keep it going.
                            Sometimes they'd slip firecrackers into the stove and things like that.
                            There was no inside water-going sewerage. You had your outhouses back a
                            good distance behind the school, and every Halloween the boys would
                            dynamite those. They would go around and take people's front gates down
                            and put them in front of the steps and ring the doorbell. It's a wonder
                            somebody hasn't broken a leg, but they never did. They got to where
                            they'd look for it. One year they took the principal's buggy and took
                            the wheels off and got it up on top of the school building and put the
                            wheels back on it. I never could figure out how they did it. I wasn't in
                            on it. Just pranks, mostly. At recess, we'd play baseball, catch, and
                            basketball, pretty well, I reckon, like they do today.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>How was the day organized? Did you have periods?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, we had periods. We had a little recess and a big recess. The classes
                            usually ran about forty-five minutes, and we changed classes. I don't
                            know why the teachers didn't change, but <pb id="p37" n="37"/> they
                            didn't; the students changed. You had enough time to run down to the
                            toilet, and they'd have a hand-pulled bell that would signal the end of
                            the class or the beginning of the class or recess. There was some manual
                            punishment for extraordinary things that had been done. Usually, though,
                            it was a question of standing in the corner or being deprived of a short
                            recess—maybe you'd stay in the classroom, things like that—but
                            occasionally they'd send a boy down to the principal's office to get a
                            paddling. That went on, I reckon, as long as I was in school. Sometimes
                            you'd have a little hassle about things like that, but not as a rule.
                            The families usually backed the schoolteachers and the principal up.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Did people see a big difference between this graded school and the
                            academy that preceded it?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, we thought it was quite an improvement. We had regular curricula,
                            you see. Under the academy, I think, it was more or less left to the
                            headmaster to work these things out. But with the graded schools, as the
                            name implies, they were actually graded and the curricula set up for
                            each grade on a progressive basis. We thought it was much better. We
                            thought that was quite a step forward.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Why did you think it was a step forward?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>We thought education was a progressive science or procedure and that it
                            wasn't just a conglomerate of information that you threw together. For
                            instance, in mathematics you should start off with arithmetic, and you
                            should gradually work into algebra, <pb id="p38" n="38"/> geometry, and
                            trigonometry, and so on. And that all education was that way, that you
                            start your history off with your local history, your state history, then
                            your regional and national history, and then world history. The whole
                            thing was a matter of progression. But this was not true in the academy.
                            In the academy, they'd start you off teaching you the Bible and trying
                            to teach you Hebrew and Greek and Latin, that you had no practical use
                            for. Well, when I was in school, we had to take Latin, and I notice I
                            passed two years of Latin, but I swear I don't remember it. I reckon I
                            did.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>So you felt that that kind of an education, where things would be
                            organized …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Ultimately, all secondary school curricula are dictated by the
                            requirements of our colleges. It got to the point where a student could
                            not enter college unless he had certain courses. If the school didn't
                            give those courses, he either had to make those courses up at the
                            college, which quite often would have provisions for doing that,
                            especially N. C. State… It was a land grant college, and many of the
                            boys that went there had never had a foreign language, for instance, and
                            never had gotten beyond the multiplication table or the <hi rend="i"
                                >Blue Back Speller</hi>. Consequently, they had to provide
                            facilities for them; as they went along with some of their freshman
                            college studies like English and things like that, they also had to make
                            up these other courses that they lacked on the entrance requirements. So
                            ultimately I think you could truthfully say that the colleges dictate
                            the curricula employed by the public schools.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Would you say, then, that the graded school was sort of a <pb id="p39"
                                n="39"/> coordinated piece with the other kinds of changes that were
                            under way?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, I do. I think it was part and parcel of the growing-up pains of a
                            rural community. And this was reflected into everything, Wayne. If you
                            had gone to church long enough, over a long period of time in years, you
                            could see the evolution of the sermon along different lines. The sermon
                            becoming a little more what we might call liberal, where you would
                            question certain things as "Maybe this is symbolic." This is not actual;
                            we don't think Lot's wife actually turned into a pillar of salt, but
                            maybe the writer meant so-and-so. That became permissible. I remember
                            when it was not permissible. But it was part and parcel of the whole
                            thing. And then the nation; we were growing up, too. We began to create
                            news on a national basis. We developed our wire service so that the <hi
                                rend="i">Charlotte Observer</hi> or the <hi rend="i">Monroe
                            Inquirer</hi> would get news from the same source, from New York,
                            Washington, so forth and so on, through the telegraph, which was a new
                            thing. Then we began to develop national organizations, your civic
                            service organizations, your veterans' organizations, your professional
                            organizations, even things like the medical society. These things began
                            to appear, so that we developed not only a national consciousness, but
                            this was reflected into the states and into the local communities. My
                            boyhood and young manhood was a thrilling period to live in, to see
                            these things unfolding right before your eyes and quite often not even
                            realizing it until years later. But we were building a nation and we
                            were unifying a nation and establishing a set of values that should have
                            been maintained, <pb id="p40" n="40"/> but I'm afraid quite often they
                            were not.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>It sounds to me like the people were being taken out of these old
                            neighborhoods and their local connections and moving into new kinds of
                            organizations, making new connections. It sounds like a general
                            reorganization of society.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I expect this is probably true, that we were refashioning society along
                            somewhat different lines. Yes, I think that would be fair to say
                        that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What would you say would be the general characteristics or the general
                            principles of this new society? How did it differ from the old society
                            that had preceded it?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>The old society was simplistic, overly so. It was a society in which
                            there were <hi rend="i">bona fides.</hi> I mean if a question arose in a
                            school or a social group or just an informal group of people talking,
                            for instance, about something that the group considered important but on
                            which there was no unanimity of thinking and they wanted an answer, a
                            positive answer was always available. We lived in a period of positivism
                            and not relativism, and we went to the preacher. There was never,
                            really, but one educated man in the average rural community, and that
                            was the doctor. He was the only man that had been to college. Most of
                            the preachers had never been to college. Most of them mistook a case of
                            indigestion for a call to preach and became preachers. In the case of
                            the Baptist Church, all it took to get ordained was to get three
                            preachers to ordain you. We went through a period of that changing. That
                            all occurred during my lifetime, when the Methodist Church, for
                            instance, wouldn't accept <pb id="p41" n="41"/> a minister who hadn't
                            graduated from a theological seminary. This sort of thing. But, as I
                            say, there was always a positive answer that you could get on …</p>
                    </sp>

                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>[END OF TAPE 2, SIDE A]</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                </div2>
                <div2 id="tape2-b" n="2-B" type="tape_side">
                    <head>[TAPE 2, SIDE B]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 2, SIDE B]</p>
                    </note>

                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>We're going to talk a little bit about the twentieth century this
                            afternoon, and I think maybe the best way would be to start off talking
                            about Mr. Shute's career and what he did before we talk about public
                            issues and policies. As I understand it, you started out in cars
                        first.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>That's correct.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>How did you come into that, and how did that get you started?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I don't know that it did actually get me started, because I didn't get
                            under way too well before there was a turn in the economy. I got in the
                            automobile business along about 1925, I believe, and it did bring me in
                            touch with Henry Adams, and the two of us together built the first
                            airport in Monroe, on the Waxhaw Road, which operated for several years.
                            We built seven planes, and we were the competitors of Pan American. We
                            were a little bit larger than they were at that time. They were based
                            down in Miami, and we were the opposition bidders against them for all
                            foreign airmail contracts. We always underbid them, but we never did get
                            any. I finally went to Washington and talked to the Postmaster General
                            and practically accused him of shenanigans with Pan American, giving
                            them the contracts at the maximum rate, which was two dollars a
                            pound-mile. We had bid what <pb id="p42" n="42"/> we thought we had bid
                            in the route to Nassau and the one to Havana and the one to Mexico City,
                            but we didn't get any of them. When he didn't throw me out of his office
                            for insinuating he was crooked, then I knew I had hit the nail on the
                            head. That's the reason that when Roosevelt became President, he
                            cancelled all the foreign airmail contracts and renegotiated all of
                            them. He flew a lot of the airmail contracts with the Army pilots, which
                            was almost a disaster. Anyhow, we had an airplane business here in
                            Monroe. We did air photography, student training, and mostly
                            passenger-hopping. People loved to go up in planes back then; it was so
                            new, right after World War I, that they'd come out on Saturdays and
                            Sundays. We'd do a tremendous business. We opened the first flying field
                            in Charlotte, Gastonia, Mount Airy, Durham, Camden, Columbia. We
                            operated in a lot of different places.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>About when was this?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>That was beginning in 1926. For about three years, I was involved. The
                            panic in '29 caught all of us. As a matter of fact, I sold my automobile
                            business about that time on credit. (I might say, parenthetically, I
                            never got a penny for it. The local hospital, which was municipally
                            owned, was leased to this doctor from South Carolina who was a very good
                            surgeon, and he brought two other surgeons with him, and they had gotten
                            in terrible financial condition. Dr. Mahoney asked me to come as
                            business manager to try to get them out of debt, and I did. I went over
                            there and stayed for nearly a year and got them in fairly good condition
                            and then left them. In the meantime, all the banks closed, and
                            everything went to pot.) <pb id="p43" n="43"/> It put me in contact with
                            the late Henry S. Adams, who was an insurance man, a very fine
                            gentleman. In World War II, he trained pilots for the Air Force. He was
                            a civilian. Then he and I together built the first municipal airport in
                            Monroe and operated it for twenty years. It was a large airport with
                            hangars and everything. We had a school, A and E Mechanics' School for
                            pilots of all types. We did a brokerage business in the United States
                            and Canada in war surplus planes and operated flight schools and
                            everything. It was a very successful operation.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What years was that?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>We opened that airport in '46 on a ten-year lease with a ten-year option,
                            which we exercised, and we built the buildings out there, too. That was
                            located where the Monroe Mall now is, that property in there around
                            Dickerson Boulevard. It was a very fine operation. My oldest son was
                            killed flying out of that airport. He was a licensed pilot, and he was
                            studying for his commercial pilot's license when something went wrong
                            with his plane. I had bought him a plane from the Royal Canadian Air
                            Force. As a matter of fact, we bought three of them and sent up pilots
                            who flew them back down here and sent them through our repair depot and
                            had them licensed in America. They were excellent planes, and I had one
                            of those for him when he came out of the Air Force, not as a pilot but
                            as a tail-gunner. He was in the Far East in the Air Force and didn't get
                            a scratch until he got back, and he was killed shortly after he got
                            back. But you were talking about my career. I became interested in
                            construction. Of course, being a member of the Shute family, I would. My
                            father <pb id="p44" n="44"/> lived to be ninety, and he had formed a
                            partnership consisting of my two sisters and myself that took over all
                            of his property in 1935. I got interested in politics a little later on,
                            and in 1934 I ran for the state senate and was elected and served in the
                            senate of 1935. I was Chairman of the Senate Library Committee, and in
                            that capacity I got a bill through which created the statewide library
                            system. At that time, there had been no enabling legislation passed in
                            North Carolina to permit cities and counties to appropriate tax funds
                            for the support of public libraries. As a matter of fact, there was a
                            lawsuit in Charlotte which closed the Charlotte Public Library for two
                            years because of that, and this bill of mine also corrected that.
                            Although there had been previous legislation, my bill, which was so
                            broad and generous in its scope, included that also, so there'd be no
                            question about it. I also had the privilege of introducing the Homestead
                            Exemption Act, which enabled county commissioners to grant tax credits
                            to worthy people who needed help on the taxes on their homes. They could
                            reduce the value; it finally got up to, I think, $7,500. This took
                            thousands of homes off of the tax books entirely. That was back in the
                            days when there was a very low valuation and high rates. It wasn't like
                            it is today, where we try to get market valuation and low rates. I was
                            able to get that through. But my pet legislation I couldn't get through.
                            I've always been a strong advocate for independent cities such as they
                            have in Virginia, in which the city is not a part of the county and
                            there's only one tax. I lectured all over America on that subject. I
                            lectured to the North Carolina League of Municipalities that year, 1935,
                            and I wrote <pb id="p45" n="45"/> articles in <hi rend="i">The American
                                City</hi> and the <hi rend="i">Governmental News</hi> and <hi
                                rend="i">The Southern City</hi>, and I was quite active. I was not
                            eligible for membership in the League then; I later became interested in
                            it when I was mayor, and I was elected President of the North Carolina
                            League of Municipalities, and I did still further work in the idea of
                            the independent city, the free city, and also in zoning. I got the city
                            to… I'm getting a little ahead of myself. Maybe I should go back and say
                            that after I went to the Senate, I didn't run for re-election. I got the
                            idea that if a person really wants to go into politics to be of service
                            to his fellow man, it looked to me like the place to do it was at the
                            local level, because that's where the people were and that's where the
                            problems were. I had planned to run for Congress, and I gave the idea
                            up. I was Chairman of our Congressional Executive Committee for this
                            district, so I ran for and was elected to the Union County Board of
                            Education and became Chairman of it. There I strove to get some measure
                            of help—not equality, but help—to the black citizens of the county.
                            There wasn't a single brick building in the county devoted to black
                            education. There was only one high school; that was in Monroe in a frame
                            building down on Maurice Street. We had abandoned a brick school at
                            Marvin over in the extreme western part of the county, and I finally got
                            the Board of Education to set up West Union High School for blacks. I
                            had the honor of delivering the first commencement address there when
                            they graduated their first class. The people there objected very
                            strenuously to it, although a couple of years later they thanked me for
                            it, said they were able to get the best tenants they had ever had on
                            their farms because of the good <pb id="p46" n="46"/> school. I only
                            served one term there. I then was elected to the Board of County
                            Commissioners and served three terms there as Chairman of the Board and
                            was able to be of some assistance there, too. I set up a retirement fund
                            for all county employees. That later, I understand, has been
                            incorporated into the State Retirement System. I also was able to try to
                            help with the young people. I served as Chairman of the Advisory
                            Committee on the NYA and WPA both. We established a program of
                            stonemasonry for the NYA. I gave them the land with the quarry without
                            cost. We had no money, you see, then; this was in the thirties. We took
                            a piece of property that had been taken in for taxes— I think we had ten
                            acres of pines up near New Salem—and cut the timber from there and had
                            it sawed into the bill of goods that we needed for our construction
                            work. We wanted to build a county school garage first, which we did. We
                            then built the armory, which was a beautiful building; it's still
                            standing. These boys quarried the stone. We took four old school busses
                            and took the bodies off and rebuilt the engines ourselves and used them
                            for trucks. We hauled the stone. I had a supervisor who was a good
                            stonemason and a good carpenter on top of it, and we built these
                            buildings with wooden bowstring trusses. One of the buildings had
                            trusses in it 105 feet long. That's the largest I ever heard of
                            anywhere, certainly in North Carolina. As these boys would graduate from
                            this class, there were jobs waiting for them in Charlotte at a dollar an
                            hour, which was high pay back then. That was even before Henry Ford went
                            to the outlandish price of a dollar an hour. So one thing I was very
                            much interested in was the NYA. I had Mrs. Roosevelt, the President's
                            wife, come down here <pb id="p47" n="47"/> and see. She was fascinated
                            with the work. She was a strong admirer of NYA. That's where she picked
                            up Lyndon Johnson. He was her protégé because of his association with
                            NYA.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>When did Mrs. Roosevelt come down?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Come to Monroe? My guess would be along about 1939, and it is a guess.
                            You can document that, because it's on the record. But she was
                            fascinated with it. We also had a sewing project for the young girls.
                            We'd rented a home—I think it was on Windburn Street here in Monroe—and
                            they made clothing and things for the Red Cross. In the meantime, I
                            served as Chairman of the County Board of Health, I think for ten years.
                            After I served on the Board of County Commissioners, that's when I was
                            elected Mayor, in 1947. I immediately put in a retirement system there
                            and enacted zoning for the first time. We got a crew down from the
                            Graduate School of Government at Chapel Hill, and they stayed in the
                            fire station here. (Incidentally, I converted the fire department from a
                            volunteer to a professional department.) These students made a complete,
                            definitive study of the city and its needs. We got the town of West
                            Monroe—that's what we called Icemorlee; that's where the Johnson Mills
                            and Mutual Industries are—to vote to give up their charter and come into
                            the city, which they did. We got what had been Camp Sutton, that area,
                            to come into the city. Previously, Benton Heights had voted and gave
                            their charter up and came into the city. So that when the census of 1950
                            came around, Monroe went into the 10,000-population class for the first
                            time. But I'd like to go back just a bit, to my administration as
                            Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. <pb id="p48" n="48"/> I
                            was serving when the War broke out in '41, and we immediately began
                            working to get an Army camp here. We had had the Carolina Army Maneuvers
                            here in '41. They had completed their maneuvers, I think, in October
                            before Pearl Harbor in December. The general headquarters for the
                            maneuvers were located here in Monroe; I went to Washington and got them
                            to do that. General Drum, who was the Commanding General of the First
                            Army, was so pleased with the relationship with the civilians of Union
                            County that when they got instructions to locate four staging camps for
                            immediate temporary training of troops after Pearl Harbor, we prevailed
                            upon him to use the headquarters that we had built on Sutherland Avenue
                            here in Monroe as a nucleus for a new camp which I got them to name for
                            Frank Sutton. He was a Monroe boy who was a flight sergeant in the Royal
                            Canadian Air Force and was killed at Tobruk the same day that the Japs
                            bombed Pearl Harbor. So they did; they named it Camp Sutton. That camp
                            meant a great deal to Monroe. The camp was built in '42. From then
                            through '45, when the War was over, Monroe enjoyed a prosperity not
                            equaled by any of the surrounding cities.Because of the control of
                            building materials and the wage and price controls and everything else,
                            a lot of the towns suffered during the War from an income standpoint and
                            a job standpoint, but Monroe boomed during that period. Every house was
                            filled. Empty rooms were filled, garage apartments. We got permits from
                            the Government and built a lot of housing and apartments and additions.
                            As Chairman of the Board of Health, I was able to get the Government,
                            during the War, to appropriate the money to build the Union County
                            Health Center on Hayne Street. I was sorry to see the <pb id="p49"
                                n="49"/> County Commissioners recently sell that building. They
                            shouldn't have, because it was an excellent building. We had an
                            excellent Board of Health here in the county. Another thing, as a result
                            of the statewide library legislation that I was able to get through: we
                            reorganized the whole program locally, which had been operated by
                            volunteers, dedicated people, but without any resources at all. They
                            insisted I serve as the first Chairman of the Union County Library
                            Board, which I did, and we got that off the ground. Then I think I
                            mentioned we set up the Retirement Board; I served as Chairman of that.
                            Then we decided, after the War, that Union County had to have industrial
                            income. We had an excellent, diversified farming program, one of the
                            best in the state. We had gradually gotten off of cotton due to the
                            excellent work of Tom Broom, who was the county agent, and we had gone
                            to small grain and poultry. We set as a goal the matching of our farm
                            income with industrial income, if we could maintain a balance that we'd
                            have an ideal economy, and believe it or not, this was achieved. It took
                            years to do it, but we did. I got Dallas Daley, who was the industrial
                            agent for the Seaboard Railroad, to resign and come with us as
                            industrial engineer and operate the program, and we set up offices on
                            South Main Street where The Flower Land is now located. That proved to
                            be a bonanza for the county. Since World War II, we've located
                            approximately forty new industries in Monroe and Union County, and we
                            did achieve the balance to which I referred, so I think we've got,
                            really, the best-balanced economy in North Carolina today. It's
                            partially reflected in the remarkable population growth of Union County.
                            Our growth has been considerably above the state average. <pb id="p50"
                                n="50"/> That takes in everything except the fact that I for years
                            got into designing and building and sometimes financing industrial
                            plants, not only in Monroe and Union county but over in Albemarle as
                            well and other places. I devoted most of my energies to that until I
                            actually got out of active business entirely except for the holding
                            company we have. We divided up the J. R. Shute Company, and I fell heir
                            to the title, and so my property is operated under the name J. R. Shute
                            Company. My two sisters are both dead. One of them had a daughter, who
                            just recently bought a home in Union County. She has two daughters. She
                            graduated from the University of Georgia in city planning, of all
                            things. So that's about the story of my rise and fall. I did build the
                            first radio station here, WMAP. That also was in 1946, right after the
                            War. I served as President of the Union Broadcasting Corporation, the
                            Union Aircraft Corporation, the Union Laundry Service, and the Monroe
                            Investment Corporation. By the way, one thing I'm sort of proud of: when
                            the American Bank and Trust Company was organized fifty-two years ago, I
                            was their first depositor. I rented them the building that they opened
                            up in; it was my property.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Let me go back and ask you some more specific questions.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>All right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>You've been on and been in on a lot of different things.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I sure have touched a lot of bases.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I think the thing I'd like to start with first is something that's been
                            interesting to me. I've read the county minutes and I've also read the
                            newspaper for the period from 1910 to 1920, and so I've got a little
                            more information about that period than some of the other <pb id="p51"
                                n="51"/> periods. It was real interesting to me that there seemed to
                            be a big push on, in a variety of different ways, to accumulate and
                            bring capital into Monroe.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Several different banks opened up, and savings and loan associations
                            opened up, and they openly advertised for working men to put their
                            savings into these banks. At the same time, several insurance companies
                            opened up, and for the first time the courthouse was insured. Then along
                            about that time, around 1910 or so, the county began to borrow money
                            from the outside for the first time …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>… which I thought was interesting, because that then used the resources
                            of the government to pull capital into the local economy and then let
                            the people with money here go ahead and invest in other things here.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I just wonder what you remember about that period. You kind of got in on
                            the tail end of it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, yes. I started out rather young in life as a businessman. You see,
                            I married when I was only twenty years old, so I was up and going in my
                            twenties. As a matter of fact, I was elected President of the Chamber of
                            Commerce when I was only, I think, twenty-two years old. That was in
                            1926. I had the honor of being elected President a second time twenty
                            years later. Obviously, I remember a lot of the things that were done,
                            the bringing of a creamery to Monroe back in the twenties. We got the
                            idea early in <pb id="p52" n="52"/> the game that where we could, we
                            should try to bring things to the county that would use our raw
                            materials, our farm products, our natural assets that we had here in the
                            land and so forth and so on. We established a creamery. Ellen Fitzgerald
                            left her property to the city to build a hospital, and a municipal
                            hospital was built. That was early on and shortly after World War I. So
                            there were many things like this that were done that I remember quite
                            well. Back in the early twenties we had a Rotary Club and a Kiwanis
                            Club. I had the honor of belonging, at one time or another, to both of
                            them. We had a good Chamber of Commerce that was organized around the
                            turn of the century, around 1900. And then the railroad. That meant so
                            much to Monroe. When they built the roundhouse over there where they
                            repaired the locomotives and trains, that brought skilled mechanics in
                            here from all over the whole South, and these were high-salaried people.
                            Monroe was made the exchange point for crews, which meant that your
                            conductors and flagmen and engineers and firemen and brakemen and their
                            families lived in Monroe, and these were the highest-salaried people in
                            Union County. Especially the conductors and engineers. They drew
                            extremely high salaries, and, incidentally, they were the only unionized
                            labor in the county. This, too, opened up new fields of exploitation for
                            our economy and was very helpful. The churches all built substantial new
                            churches early on. The Central Methodist Church was an architectural
                            gem, really. I thought their bell tower was one of the prettiest church
                            bell towers I've ever seen. It just broke my heart to see that building
                            ravaged and torn down, and a parking lot taking its place. I'm for
                            parking lots, but I <pb id="p53" n="53"/> also am for preservation of
                            historic buildings. But nearly all of the churches built new churches;
                            we built new schools; there was a spirit of optimism. They established
                            locally the Monroe Cotton Mills. I mentioned before the wagon company
                            and the buggy factory. And there were other things like that that we did
                            that were very helpful, very helpful.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>How did the nature and structure of finance change? Did the ways you
                            borrowed and lent money change at that time?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>You mentioned the bringing in of foreign capital. There was very little
                            foreign financing that I was aware of in Union County back in the early
                            years. Everything, nearly, was financed locally. You see, this was the
                            aftermath of the Reconstruction period after the Civil War. The
                            southerners couldn't borrow money anywhere, and they were discriminated
                            against by their own government, and you couldn't get federal money into
                            the South hardly under any pretense whatever. We sort of inherited the
                            idea of going it alone in this part of the country. This was carried on
                            through, and we never really got into the public stream, so far as
                            financing was concerned, until after World War I. And then we did the
                            best we could. We made a play for New England mills to move down here
                            because of our low taxes. We had the lowest utility rate in the country,
                            and we had the cheapest labor available, non-union labor. These things
                            attracted thousands of new industries all over the South, and some of
                            those came to Union County. Really, though, in addition to that
                            particular period, the next period of dynamic growth of Monroe was the
                            period fol …</p>
                    </sp>

                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>[END OF TAPE 2, SIDE B]</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                </div2>
                <div2 id="tape3-a" n="3-A" type="tape_side">
                    <head>[TAPE 2, SIDE B]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 3, SIDE A]</p>
                    </note>

                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>… the impression I've got from reading this stuff is that it all hangs
                            together as a piece. It's not just a few men out to make bucks and a few
                            people over here to do good in the church, but it has a pattern and a
                            movement and it hangs together.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I think that's true. I was commenting on the next important surge in the
                            life of Monroe, the post-War period. As I say, Camp Sutton did for
                            Monroe what Camp Greene did for Charlotte. It furnished the impetus for
                            a forward surge that in the case of Monroe, and certainly of Charlotte,
                            too, has never diminished. It gave us not only that, but in the case of
                            Monroe, the War years, through necessity, pulling together and
                            cooperating with the Government, gave us a new sense of identification
                            with our own federal government. We had always been sort of negativists
                            when it came to considering the federal government. It was kind of like
                            the Bible saying, "Nothing good comes out of Nazareth." We didn't feel
                            like anything good came out of Washington. But this thing, working with
                            the Government the way we did, changed our attitudes toward the
                            Government. Instead of working so often, as we had in the past, at
                            cross-purposes, we learned the art of cooperation and of developing
                            friendships and contacts at not only the state level but the federal
                            level, which just brought tremendous rewards to Monroe. Not only that,
                            but it gave us a spirit of confidence that we could do almost anything
                            we set our minds to, and I think this has paid tremendous dividends to
                            this city and county. As I mentioned some time back, I found early in
                            life that the men who <pb id="p55" n="55"/> were active in church life
                            and activities, served on the boards… I know the men that I served on
                            the Board of Stewards of the Methodist Church and in the Men's Club… I
                            was their first President. I organized the club. It came to mind many
                            years later that what I was doing in organizing a lot of these things
                            was carrying the same idea and the same enthusiasm into various fields
                            of activity, and that other men were doing exactly the same thing. If
                            you find a man who's active in the Chamber of Commerce, the chances are
                            he's active in the Lions' Club. I served them as their first President.
                            I served the Duke Alumni Association as President. I served as Chairman
                            of the Red Cross for twelve years, during all the War years. I gave them
                            my office—I just walked out and gave them the key—with typewriter,
                            furniture, and everything complete, the whole building with a sewing
                            room and a large ballroom and everything right in the middle of town. No
                            rent, nothing, just gave it to them for the War years. I found that that
                            spirit animated most of our people, and that has been worth a great deal
                            to Monroe. People say, "Well, why is it that just a few years back,
                            Monroe and Wadesboro were practically the same size, and yet today
                            Wadesboro is losing population and Monroe is moving forward, and Anson
                            County is losing population and Union County is just bursting at the
                            seams, and you're adjoining counties; what's the difference?" I think
                            this spirit that I referred to has a great deal to do with it, of just
                            believing you can accomplish whatever you want to. But we were never
                            very good politicians in this county. Now Anson County would get all the
                            jobs. They'd get the Congressmen, the Highway Commission, and all these
                            other things. We never would get them. I don't think we were ever …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I've noticed that in the records.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>We never were politically oriented to the extent of… <pb id="p56" n="56"
                            /> Anson is an old colonial county, organized way before the
                            Revolutionary War, and we are latecomers in it, and in the field of
                            local government I reckon we have to learn a lot from Mother Anson, so
                            to speak. But we never did have the political acumen that Anson County
                            had. They knew how to work for political plums that we never did learn
                            how to do, for some reason.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4719" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="02:05:39"/>
                    <milestone n="4110" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="02:05:40"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Essentially, what we've got here is, from 1900 through 1940—I guess you
                            really can't count the Depression—you've got an agricultural
                            redevelopment, a transformation of the agricultural economy, and then
                            after 1940, you've got an additional transformation …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Industrial development.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>… of industrial development. Do you think that one is contingent upon the
                            other?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>To a great extent, yes, but perhaps more psychological than otherwise.
                            One of our slogans in putting this across—and by the way, we got the
                            people to vote a small tax on themselves to pay for this; it was almost
                            infinitesimal; it was three cents or something like that—our goal was to
                            have one industrial employee from every farm family in Union County. We
                            stressed this continuous, until I think it got to the point where people
                            believed it. The employment practices of the mills we brought in
                            confirmed it, and found that by scattering their labor, they were never
                            available in large enough numbers to attract the unions. You get a lot
                            of people living in one community, one mill village—I'm not anti-union,
                            please don't misunderstand me; quite the contrary—they're natural
                            objects of concern and of exploitation, too, sometimes, by labor unions.
                            But scattering these people out all <pb id="p57" n="57"/> over the
                            county turned out to be a very healthy concept that's been carried
                            through, so that today you almost have that. You do in total numbers,
                            but I mean in actual count from one family to the other. If you've got
                            employable children in those families, the chances are that one of them
                            will be in industry in Union County. So that, too, is a part of the
                            philosophy behind the industrial development. I notice, too, that a lot
                            of merchants and businessmen who retire stay in the county, and they'll
                            start raising a few chickens and everything and sort of keep their hand…
                            There's a close connection between our agriculture and our industry.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4110" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="02:08:19"/>
                    <milestone n="4720" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="02:08:20"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Let me back up and ask some specific questions about the earlier part of
                            the century, because I'm really interested in how this infrastructure is
                            built and how that in turn facilitates the development of the
                            agricultural economy. I'm particularly interested in taxing powers and
                            special districts for schools and roads and bond issues. Let's start
                            with taxes. I've paid real close attention to the tax levies, as they
                            were made by the Board. There's a problem in that I don't have the
                            figures for the amount of assessments in the county, so I don't know
                            exactly what the tax base is that these levies were being made on. But
                            it appears, from 1900 through about 1931, that two things are happening.
                            One, a tremendous number of bond issues are being passed, and then the
                            Commission got the power to issue road bonds without having to have an
                            election.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Which created a tremendous debt. Then at the same time, it would appear
                            that taxes are being made more and more regressive. That <pb id="p58"
                                n="58"/> is, the burden seems to be shifting downward onto people at
                            the bottom. Did you get any sense of that?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>As the title "<hi rend="i">ad valorem</hi>" implies, there's no way to
                            discriminate in the levying of <hi rend="i">ad valorem</hi> taxes. Well,
                            there is one way, and that is in the value of the property that you are
                            taxing. The rate has to fall uniformly on everyone alike. No, if I were
                            going to guess in terms of Union County, I think I would take the
                            opposite position. In North Carolina, the counties set the tax value.
                            The cities have to accept those values and make their local levy in
                            terms of that. I don't know if it's changed—I reckon it has—but up until
                            just a short time ago, a bond election in this county had never failed.
                            Our people had always voted for them, because usually, as you mentioned,
                            the early bond issues were for local roads, local schools, which they
                            built then on a local basis. Now they do it on a county-wide basis. We
                            had not yet, in the early years of this century, developed the sense of
                            uniform taxes—by that I mean county-wide taxes—to pay for something that
                            was specifically local in nature. In other words, a county levy to build
                            a school, we'll say, in Olive Branch. The fellow that lives twenty miles
                            away in Buford Township is willing to support that issue and pay the
                            additional debt service in the form of an increase in the <hi rend="i"
                                >ad valorem</hi> levy, when his children are not going to
                            participate in it at all. But they learned to consider that the time
                            would come when Buford would need a school and would like to have the
                            support of the New Salem people to build it on a county-wide levy basis.
                            And these special districts. Incidentally, there was a time when a
                            township could levy taxes. We've passed through that now. We still <pb
                                id="p59" n="59"/> can have special districts. We can have sewer
                            districts, water districts, municipal service districts, all sorts of
                            special districts where people vote upon themselves additional taxes,
                            just like a special school district. Monroe is a special school
                            district. I think we've outlived the special school district, and I
                            think they ought to be abolished today. I don't see any need for them in
                            the future. I don't think there should be but one statewide school
                            system. Today—they recently changed the law—I not only couldn't serve as
                            Chairman of the County Board of Education, I couldn't even vote for the
                            members of the County Board of Education, because members who live in
                            special school districts have no vote at all in the county school setup.
                            That was done two or three years ago. So that's one thing that isn't
                            fair. We help pay for it, but we can't vote for the board that controls
                            and operates the school system in the county because we happen to live
                            in a special district where we pay an additional county school tax to
                            support our district. I think the time's come when the special district
                            ought to be eliminated. There'll always be occasions where you can
                            justify a special tax district, and the legislature has the authority to
                            create these districts when, in their opinion and from the evidence
                            presented to them, it can be completely justified. But, coming back to
                            the tax situation, in the six years that I was on the Board of County
                            Commissioners, we reduced the taxes every year, and when I left the
                            Board they didn't owe but $42,000, practically zero.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, that's true, after '31.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p60" n="60"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>We would have paid the $42,000 off, but the people that had them had six
                            percent bonds, and they wouldn't give them up, and they didn't have to,
                            the way they were drawn up. Six percent on a county bond back then, that
                            was something; that was an unreasonable rate. We don't bat an eye to
                            think that the United States government is paying twice that much for
                            bonds today.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Let me ask you about the Board of Equalization. The County Commissioners
                            were set as the Board of Equalization through most of the twenties and
                            the thirties. I wonder if you could tell me how it was conceived. What
                            did people think the purpose of the Board …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>The Board of Equalization and Review's function is to take complaints,
                            petitions, applications from people or groups of people who think there
                            are certain tax inequalities that need special consideration, that
                            they're out of line, that on a comparable basis x acres of land in
                            such-and-such a state of cultivation, as compared with y over here in a
                            similar situation, have a disparity in value, we'll say, that they
                            consider unreasonable, and they think it should be adjusted. This Board
                            has the authority to make this adjustment. Then, too, the man who, we'll
                            say, inherited a little house and is retired and trying to live on
                            Social Security has the opportunity, with no other source of income, to
                            go before this Board and ask for relief under the Homestead Exemption
                            Provisions of the state law. This Board can recommend to the Board of
                            County Commissioners that he get, we'll say, a $5,000 value
                            consideration in his specific case. It has no relation to anything else;
                            it's a personal matter. They have <pb id="p61" n="61"/> authority now,
                            under the law—that was my bill that I introduced—to give him up to
                            $7,500 relief in value. This sort of thing is what the Board of
                            Equalization and Review studies, inequities which will always creep in.
                            You find this Board to be most active every eight years, when you have
                            the mandatory re-evaluation of real estate values. That'll come up, I
                            think, in about two years.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>About 1931 there was a considerable controversy. Everybody was more or
                            less agreed that property values needed to be devalued at that time.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>They were, in fact, declining, and so the assessments needed to be
                            devalued. The controversy arose over whether property values should be
                            reassessed on the basis of an individual tract, considering one piece at
                            a time, and that was the position of the merchants <gap reason="unknown"
                            /> in Monroe; they presented a petition to that effect.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I think they were probably right morally. However, under state law, the
                            Board of Equalization and Review, the Commissioners, could make a
                            uniform increase or decrease right across the board. That is legal, but
                            it's not recommended because, obviously, all land is not going to
                            increase or decrease the same. Even land that looks identical—it may be
                            in the same general area—would have a basis for different values. So I
                            think the merchants were right in insisting that it be considered parcel
                            by parcel. But as I say, on the other hand, it's perfectly legal to do
                            it the other way. That's the easy way and the less expensive way to do
                            it. I don't approve of it. I don't think it's right. I don't think it's
                            fair. In other words, you take right <pb id="p62" n="62"/> here now,
                            today. Land up there around the new airport is worth ten times as much
                            today as it was ten years ago. Land that was valued up there for $250 an
                            acre today is selling for $10,000 an acre. Obviously, raising the value
                            of land uniformly all over the county on a percentage basis wouldn't
                            correct that, and you're not working a hardship on the people that own
                            that land by increasing the values, because they've sold it and rented
                            it and so forth at high, high prices, except in rare instances. There
                            again, if you think you're being discriminated against and that you're
                            doing nothing but farming the land—you're not offering it for rent or
                            sale industrially—that would be an excellent example of going before the
                            Board of Equalization and Review and asking for relief until such time
                            as the land that you are now farming is no longer used for farming and
                            becomes real estate on the market for sale to the developer. I mean it's
                            that sort of thing. One of the continuing headaches of this type of
                            thing is timber. Some states have laws that timber will be valued at a
                            base value of what it's worth at the time it's valued and will get an
                            increase of two percent per year increase due to growth of the timber,
                            maturity of the timber. Other states, like North Carolina and Union
                            County, we don't think that that's the way to do it. We don't think the
                            timber is worth anything until it's sold, and when it's sold that's the
                            time to adjust your values.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Let me ask you about some of the other development things that were going
                            on. About the time that all the new roads and the new schools are being
                            built and the physical things are coming into place, at the same time
                            the Board of Commissioners is creating an <pb id="p63" n="63"/>
                            administrative structure in the courthouse of salaried employees. I
                            wonder if you had a sense at the time that this was something really
                            different, that this was a really significant change?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you mean the similar setup to civil service, this sort of concept of
                            salary schedules and increments and things like that?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. Some of the old employees, like the clerk and the register of deeds,
                            had been on a fee system, and they were transferred to a salary
                        system.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right, yes. The transition from the fee basis to the salary basis was a
                            most difficult period. It's practically over now. There was a time when
                            the sheriff of this county, back when it was an agricultural county, was
                            one of the highest-paid sheriffs in North Carolina. That was due to the
                            fact that he didn't draw a salary. He drew a commission on taxes. The
                            collection of taxes was put into the hands of the high sheriff, and it
                            was his responsibility to collect those taxes, and he got a certain
                            percentage. And God, it ran to a fabulous fee. The thing that brought it
                            to a head was a lawsuit that we brought against a sheriff that had been
                            in office many, many years and was an excellent police officer. But he
                            was a man who was almost illiterate. I don't think he stole anything,
                            but his department was twenty or thirty thousand dollars short. This
                            brought the county up face to face with the fact that this wasn't the
                            place to collect money, especially when it was in the hands of a man who
                            couldn't hardly add a column of figures. So we created the County Tax
                            Collector, whose sole duty was the collection of taxes, and this turned
                            out to be a bonanza. It took several years to adjust these <pb id="p64"
                                n="64"/> things. The sheriff, for instance, got so much per day per
                            prisoner in the county jail. This was another bonanza, you might say,
                            that inured to the benefit of the sheriff. That was eliminated, and
                            there were many other things, and we began to get rid of these fees. The
                            same thing was true of the Clerk of Superior Court and the County
                            Register of Deeds. They were on a fee basis. But our fees got so high
                            that the salaries got out of line—they were not commensurate with the
                            position at all—so all of these salaries had to be adjusted and
                            readjusted over a period of years to get some degree of fairness in the
                            pay. That was the reason I said a few moments ago that practically every
                            courthouse could carry its own weight from its fees and collections.
                            That used to go to individuals, the profit part of it. I don't recall
                            anything offhand in this county that's on a fee basis today, unless it
                            is the magistrates and justices of the peace. I expect they are on a fee
                            basis. But this is not a big deal; these people usually have some other
                            job in addition to that. In other words, it's not the kind of job that
                            would give a man enough income to live off of, because there are so many
                            of them, for one thing.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>That brings up another thing I wanted to ask about <gap reason="unknown"
                            /> At the same time there was a shift from a fee basis to a salary basis
                                <gap reason="unknown"/>, there was also a shift, at least in Monroe
                            Township, in jurisdiction over small criminals actions from the j.p. to
                            the Recorder's Court.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I understand that there was quite a controversy over that, especially
                            involving <gap reason="unknown"/>
                            <pb id="p65" n="65"/> Do you remember anything about <gap
                                reason="unknown"/> Recorder's Court was better for Monroe?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>There's a difference of opinion on things like that. Being completely
                            outside the judicial system, I really don't have the real knowledge of
                            the problem from both sides, and I don't think it would be fair for me
                            to express an off-the-cuff opinion about something that I'm so abysmally
                            ignorant about. We reworked the entire court system, not only of Union
                            County but of the State of North Carolina. We put in appeal courts below
                            the Supreme Court, and we set up a completely different system. There
                            was a great deal of complaint, and I think most of it was justified,
                            about the j.p. system, not specifically this, that, or the other, but
                            the system itself. Some effort has been made to clean that up. I'm sure
                            that a lot of it has been cleaned up, and maybe there's a good bit more
                            to be done. That's about as far as I could go on it, because I'm not
                            familiar enough with it. I'm out of touch with that phase of the
                            courthouse.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What about the <gap reason="unknown"/> these days <gap reason="unknown"/>
                            farm administration agent <gap reason="unknown"/> home demonstration
                            agent <gap reason="unknown"/> the County Auditor?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right. The County Auditor came along about the time that this change in
                            the tax setup came along. I think those moves were excellent, every one
                            of them. I can't think of any man that's exerted more desirable
                            influence over farming in Union County than <pb id="p66" n="66"/> Tom
                            Broom. They called him "Lespezda" Broom. His son was County
                            Superintendent of Schools, and I brought him over to the city with me
                            and made him City Manager. I think everybody that knows would agree that
                            he's the man that brought Union County out of the cotton and corn status
                            and into the status of a modern, diversified agricultural county, mostly
                            in small grain and poultry. He had a hard road to travel, too, because
                            he had farmers on the boards to deal with, and a lot of them, as the
                            saying goes, were "sot in their ways," and he had a hard time. But he
                            persevered and, I think, has done a great deal. The same thing can be
                            said of some of the other officials. We had a man named David Simpson
                            who served for many years as County Auditor and was one of the finest
                            men; in addition to being a good fiscal officer, he was a fine personal
                            man, his morals. He meant a great deal to Union County and kept a lot of
                            farmers who served on the Board of County Commissioners and other boards
                            on an even keel, not because of any desire on their part to do anything
                            wrong, but because they simply didn't know. They were elected on the
                            basis of popularity, which is a weakness in the democratic system. But
                            nevertheless they were elected, and they were in a position to do this,
                            that, or the other, and he kept them straightened out. He was succeeded
                            as County Auditor by Roy J. Moore. Roy was with me when I was with the
                            County. There couldn't have been a finer, more Christian gentleman that
                            ever lived in Union County than Roy Moore. He's dead now. And he car
                        …</p>
                    </sp>

                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>[END OF TAPE 3, SIDE A]</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                </div2>
                <div2 id="tape3-b" n="3-B" type="tape_side">
                    <head>[TAPE 3, SIDE B]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 3, SIDE B]</p>
                    </note>

                    <pb id="p67" n="67"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Mrs. Lee was Superintendent of Public Welfare and an excellent one, and I
                            think I should defer to her. I think so much of her and think she did
                            such a wonderful job. By the way, you might be interested in knowing
                            that her father, the late Roland F. Beasley, who established and was
                            Editor of the <hi rend="i">Monroe Journal</hi>, was the first
                            Superintendent of Public Welfare in North Carolina, so it became a
                            family tradition, almost, didn't it? I don't know of anything about that
                            department since she left it a few years back. Who was the other officer
                            you asked about?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>The Home Demonstration Agent.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, I have the warmest spot in my heart for them. I don't even know who
                            the Home Demonstration Agent is today, but I do know this. My wife
                            drives me on weekends out in the country. I like to see things growing,
                            and I've gotten now to where I can't see them. But my wife and I talk so
                            much about the pride that's been instilled into rural homemakers. I
                            remember the day in Union County when you wouldn't see a grass lawn in
                            front of a rural home. They kept it without a blade of grass, and they
                            kept it swept off until it was just smooth dirt. I don't know if you
                            remember that period or not, but every home was that way. There was no
                            lawn at all, no shrubs or flowers or anything like that. The Home
                            Demonstration Agents—that's another one of Mrs. Roosevelt's
                            programs—were able to create these Home Demonstration Clubs in every
                            school district in the county. Back then we had thirteen high schools in
                            Union County—not schools but high schools—the same number that
                            Mecklenburg had. They had a Home Demonstration Club in each one of <pb
                                id="p68" n="68"/> those. They developed competition in lawns. They
                            finally got the old man to agree to mow the lawn occasionally, and the
                            women began to put out flowers and shrubs and trees. You go through this
                            county today, and the rural home is just as nice in appearance as the
                            homes anywhere in any part of the city, better than a lot of them. It
                            just makes me so proud of what the Home Demonstration Agents have done
                            in this county in creating pride in their homes; it's just wonderful. It
                            really is. If you didn't live through this period when nobody ever
                            painted anything out in the country… Very seldom you'd see a painted
                            house. A barn, never, because lumber was cheaper than paint. But today
                            the houses out in the rural areas are lovely and just as nice as those
                            in the city, and you can't tell the difference between the homes or the
                            people in the country and in the city. You just don't see any difference
                            at all. I worked so closely with them, I'm terribly biased about that. I
                            got a WPA grant to put a canning plant in every one of these Home
                            Demonstration Clubs, the school districts, to encourage the people to
                            plant more vegetables and to can them. I got the federal government to
                            pay for these canning plants. The only thing that the individuals had to
                            buy were the cans; they were two or three cents apiece. But a farmer
                            could bring his vegetables to the plant and use the facilities of the
                            plant and leave one-half of his product there with the Home
                            Demonstration Club, and it was used to feed the indigent. You see, it
                            went through the welfare system, so that we were furnishing not only a
                            service to the local community, but we were enabling them, in turn, to
                            contribute toward the indigent people of our county. <pb id="p69" n="69"
                            /> That was back in the days of the county home, and this was one way
                            that we had of helping. We did so many things like that that just
                            endeared me to the hearts of these people and vice versa. A lot of
                            professional musicians, during the Depression, were without jobs. Tal
                            Henry used to have a wonderful orchestra back when we could afford to
                            have dances all over the country. I had sponsored his coming to Monroe,
                            just as a youngster, to put on a dance. I read a little article in the
                            paper one day that he was in charge of this WPA project in Greensboro
                            bringing the professional musicians together to form an orchestra, and
                            they would be available under certain terms—that was to cover
                            transportation and things like that—for anywhere. I immediately wrote to
                            him, got in touch with him, went up there to see him, and arranged for
                            him to make a tour into each of the thirteen school districts in our
                            county and put on a top-flight professional musical program in the local
                            school for the people in that community. And it just went over… You have
                            no idea. Many people had never heard a professional orchestra. To see
                            these people in the flesh there on their stage in their school put on
                            this program for them… We did so many things like that, and it created a
                            wonderful feeling, and it furthered this idea of pride in your community
                            and in your home. This is one of many different reasons that I feel so
                            kindly toward the Home Demonstration program. I think it's meant a great
                            deal to us, a great deal.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>You mentioned canning clubs. The counterpart of that for boys was the
                            Boys' Corn Clubs.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p70" n="70"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Were those around when you grew up?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I wasn't in on that. Also, later, the Agriculture Department put on a
                            program for raising steers and swine, and I think the banks bought the
                            steers for the youngsters. That was handled, I believe, through the 4-H
                            Clubs. They raised them, and at the end of a certain period—I reckon it
                            was a year—at the county fair they were judged. If I'm not mistaken,
                            they got a dollar a pound for whatever the prize one weighed at the time
                            of the judging. But there was a good bit of that done. These are things
                            that were done all along. We put on poultry specialists. We put on this,
                            that, and the other type of specialist under Tom Broom, and then, after
                            he was gone, it was continued. We at one time were the largest poultry
                            county in the state. I think the largest egg-producing county. We're
                            still up near the top. We're the largest turkey-producing county. When I
                            was in the legislature, we had passed over into the period where we
                            were, you might say, self-supporting. We were no longer a pauper county.
                            At that time, we had the highest percentage of home-owned farms of any
                            county in the state, and one of the lowest acreage. Our average farm was
                            only forty-two acres. But the people on those farms owned them, and they
                            did the work on it; they didn't have tenants. Very few tenants in this
                            county.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>One thing I saw in the newspaper: I'm not really sure what to think about
                            it. There is no microfilm of the newspaper before 1910, so I had to
                            start there. From 1910 through about 1918 or '20, there was a
                            considerable amount of crime and violence reported in <pb id="p71"
                                n="71"/> great detail and great number in the newspaper. There were
                            two kinds, really: blacks shooting blacks over some very small
                            arguments, the kind of thing like that, which usually got just a few
                            lines in the newspaper. And then there were really what amounted to
                            attacks on fairly wealthy people. The most spectacular one, I guess, was
                            the attack on the Houston daughters in their home. A young white fellow
                            invaded the house and terrorized them for several hours and took some
                            little thing when he left. I wondered if you remembered that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Was that the Houston or Fletcher?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I think it was the Houston house. It came as, evidently, quite a shock to
                            the community.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4720" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="02:40:51"/>
                    <milestone n="4111" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="02:40:52"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>That's true. That sort of thing didn't occur very often. I remember
                            several cases of rape, but it's rather funny; the ones that I remember,
                            there were only whites involved. When a black raped a white woman in
                            those days, he usually had a very difficult time being arrested. Quite
                            often he'd be killed before the sheriff ever got him. I mean it just
                            didn't happen. But I do remember several cases, some of which, I'm sure,
                            were not truly rape cases. I remember one that occurred in Morrisville.
                            A schoolteacher and this young man went out on a date, and she came back
                            and couldn't get in the screen door and had to wake up the people in
                            whose home she lived. She was so disheveled, they commented on it, and
                            she said the boy had raped her. He served a prison term for that, and
                            I'm sure if that screen door had been unlatched, there never would have
                            been anything said about it at all. You had things like this that
                            occurred. I served as foreman of a <pb id="p72" n="72"/> jury on a case
                            like that, and we found the man not guilty. The judge, afterwards,
                            commented to us privately that he thought we had done the right thing,
                            that that was his opinion, too. But I was just trying to think about the
                            Houstons. I don't recall the details.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>They commented in the article, said "This is unprecedented." This kind of
                            thing hadn't happened.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>It is. It very seldom happened. You must realize, too, that before World
                            War I we lived under a much stricter code of ethics than we live under
                            today. There was not this permissiveness that's so rampant today. I'm
                            not establishing any value judgments on the social behavior today, but
                            I'm simply pointing out that we live in an entirely different society
                            culturally. Back then, the least little thing that was out of the
                            ordinary was considered pretty bad, but a rape case was just
                            intolerable. That was just something that you couldn't hardly conceive
                            of occurring among white people. The only thing you could think about
                            would be a black who had gotten drunk or was out of his mind or
                            something like that and did a thing like that, but you just couldn't
                            consider things like that in that period of time. So if they said
                            something was unusually bad, by today's standards, with the exception of
                            rape and acts of violence, you might not consider them too bad. I don't
                            think we ever had a period as bad for rapes and deeds of violence as we
                            have today. I mean it's terrible, I think—I really do—and I'm fairly
                            liberal in my views about a lot of things, but it's pretty bad today.
                            It's <pb id="p73" n="73"/> pretty bad. It isn't safe for even men to be
                            out alone at night, and my God, it's not safe for women to be out even
                            in broad daylight. Quite often, harm will come to them in the
                        daytime.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="4111" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="02:45:11"/>
                    <milestone n="4721" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="02:45:12"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Let me ask you one sort of general question about the Depression. It's my
                            impression, after reading the Commissioners' minutes, that one of the
                            major problems that hit the government and consequently the county here
                            after 1931 was that the county had floated so many bond issues, had
                            begun that, really, after World War I, that they had built up a
                            tremendous debt service that they had to pay …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>… which amounted to about half of the property levy. Suddenly, in '30 and
                            '31, the principal started coming due on a lot of these debts.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>I wondered if, at that time, you had the sense that was maybe partly a
                            self-created problem. When these bonds were floated, the rationale was
                            if you build the infrastructure, that would expand the tax base …</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>… and thus the expanded tax base would pay off the principal without
                            having to raise the taxes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>That was the problem that confronted all governments from the federal on
                            down, and the formula that was usually applied is almost what you've
                            just said; <gap reason="unknown"/> spending this amount of money to
                            create a situation which, in turn, would create additional <pb id="p74"
                                n="74"/> income to the governmental agency floating the bonds. Then
                            when the economy went to pot, just went to pieces, those criteria no
                            longer applied. We went through a period when the county had to pay its
                            schoolteachers with scrip. It wasn't worth the paper it was written on,
                            although the scrip that was issued in this county was all paid, and
                            Union County never repudiated a single bond issue and never repudiated
                            any indebtedness of any kind.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, that's what I thought. I haven't found any bonds that were ever
                            repudiated.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>No, you won't; you won't find it. And not only that, but the fine farming
                            facilities of Union County provided a means of sustenance to the vast
                            majority of people living in the county. Nearly everybody had a garden
                            back then, had chickens and things like that, and we were able to
                            weather the Depression. Nobody had any money. There was no money in this
                            county. But there was no indebtedness to speak of, either, from
                            individuals. Some of them owed, naturally. But we got out of the
                            Depression far better than most counties in North Carolina, and it was
                            because we were so well provided for from our own farms. And people
                            helped each other, not only within the family, in the neighborhood, but
                            otherwise. There was a feeling of obligation. And you were able to buy a
                            lot of food for one dollar. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> You
                            could make it pretty well.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>There was a real serious problem with the tax collection, from what I can
                            tell. In 1935, the Commissioners proposed putting the sheriff back on a
                            fee basis, and you opposed that, right?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p75" n="75"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>What was the rationale of the Commissioners for wanting to do that?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I don't actually know—I don't think I ever talked with any of them—but I
                            presume it was because the tax collections had fallen so low that they
                            probably thought they could save a dollar or two. Now that's rather
                            crass, but that could be the reason. I can't think of anybody in that
                            period of time actually wanting to go back to a fee basis for the
                            sheriff. I don't think the people would have stood for it, to begin
                            with.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes, according to the Commissioners' minutes, they proposed that, and
                            then you came back a couple weeks later and said that you had at least
                            fifty citizens who had complained already, and they weren't going to
                            stand for it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Right.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>So it was dropped.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>It created a good bit of heat while it lasted, I mean the comment. I
                            remember that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you feel, then, that the county government did about as well as it
                            could do under those circumstances?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, I think so. It was not the best board we ever had in that particular
                            period, and it wasn't the worst. These people were all people of good
                            will who wanted to help. They quite often did the wrong thing.
                            Politicians are prone to do that. They're not always right. But I don't
                            know, looking back on the various problems that confronted them. They
                            were not competent to furnish answers to problems that were plaguing the
                            federal and state governments at <pb id="p76" n="76"/> the same time,
                            except in a tremendously magnified way, so I wouldn't criticize those
                            people too severely, I don't think. I think that's just one of the
                            facets of our history that we have to look at realistically. I think by
                            and large that this county has been blessed with honest administration
                            at all levels. Not the best and not the worst, but, as a rule, perfectly
                            honest. This is my personal opinion.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>One thing I wanted to ask you about the commissioners. I haven't been
                            able to keep track of the occupation of every single commissioner,
                            although I know quite a few of them, but it's my impression that very
                            often there was an attempt to kind of balance the commissioners so that
                            there was a mix of merchants and farmers on there.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>There have been many efforts through the years, not only here but
                            everywhere else, to try to get a fair mix geographically, urban and
                            rural, in some cases nowadays a feeling that we ought to have a woman on
                            the board, we ought to have a black on the board, this sort of thing.
                            Through the years, there's been an effort to do that. There has been
                            through the years a certain amount of antagonism, even, between the city
                            and county. I mean the people themselves have not had the spirit of
                            cooperation between the city and county governments that should exist,
                            because what's good for one is good for the other. This would be my
                            greatest complaint of local government today, the lack of cooperation
                            between the city and county governments. But I do think there have been
                            honest efforts to mix them. I think the present Board of County
                            Commissioners, <pb id="p77" n="77"/> for example, is probably the most
                            anti-city of any board we've ever had, and yet every member of the
                            county board lives in Monroe Township. I believe I'm correct about that.
                                <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> Every single one of them. I
                            believe Harold Johnson has recently moved out of the township, but he's
                            serving a term. His name is on the ballot, but he's not running for
                            re-election. When he was elected, he was a resident of the city of
                            Monroe. And Roger Tice and Harold Myers and V. T. Helms and, I think,
                            Hudson, I think all of them live in Monroe Township. That's rather odd,
                            that every one of them would be anti-city. Anything the city wants to
                            do, they seem to be opposed to it, regardless of what it is. To a great
                            extent, the same thing works the other way, too. The average man in the
                            county can't get it into his head that residents of the city are also
                            residents of the county. Not too many of them realize, I'm afraid, that
                            the people who live in the city pay the same county tax that the fellow
                            who lives out on the farm pays. They don't seem to realize that. They
                            seem to think that we don't pay county tax, whereas we pay county and
                            city tax, and it's most unfortunate, most unfortunate.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Let me ask you one more thing. I really haven't gone into this in any
                            detail in the newspapers or anything, but I do know that between 1957
                            and 1965 there was a considerable amount of racial controversy in the
                            county. Without going into any great detail, do you have any sense of
                            where that came from or how it originated?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, I suppose so. We had always thought that we had done very well in
                            struggling to get into the new integrated society that was being built
                            in America. We thought we were doing fairly <pb id="p78" n="78"/> well.
                            We had done a lot of very commendable things, and when we did have a
                            flare-up, why, frankly I think it surprised most people, because they
                            didn't think it was justified. They thought that maybe a few
                            individuals, the head of the Klan and a black leader, were both
                            primarily interested in their own person aggrandizement, their own
                            publicity and everything, than they were, really, in improving
                            relations. I don't think either one of them were much interested in
                            that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Do you have any sense of why other people chose to follow them, then?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p><note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> You're asking me a sociological
                            question that I don't think anybody can answer. I don't know why people
                            do that. I reckon it's the old principle of the sheep going over the
                            cliff, following the leader even when the leader's wrong.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">WAYNE DURRILL:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, I've about exhausted my questions here for the time being.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">JOHN RAYMOND SHUTE:</speaker>
                        <p>I appreciate your taking the time to do this. I'm all for it. I think
                            it's wonderful.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>END OF INTERVIEW</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                    <milestone n="4721" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="02:58:14"/>
                </div2>
            </div1>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI.2>
