<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite_sohp_ms.dtd">
<TEI.2>
    <teiHeader type="Southern Oral History Project" status="new">
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>
                    <hi rend="bold">Oral History Interview with Eva Clayton, July 18, 1989.
                        Interview C-0084. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007):</hi>
                    Electronic Edition. </title>
                <title type="descriptive">Building Progress: A Black Woman's Effort to
                    Transform Warren County, North Carolina</title>
                <author>
                    <name id="ce" reg="Clayton, Eva" type="interviewee">Clayton, Eva</name>,
                    interviewee </author>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Interview conducted by </resp>
                    <name id="nk" reg="Nasstrom, Kathryn" type="interviewer">Nasstrom,
                    Kathryn</name>
                </respStmt>
                <funder>Funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services supported the
                    electronic publication of this interview.</funder>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
                    <name id="mm">Mike Millner</name>
                </respStmt>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Sound recordings digitized by </resp>
                    <name id="as">Aaron Smithers</name>
                    <name id="sfc">Southern Folklife Collection</name>
                </respStmt>
            </titleStmt>
            <editionStmt>
                <edition>First edition, <date>2006</date>
                </edition>
            </editionStmt>
            <extent>88 Kb</extent>
            <publicationStmt>
                <publisher>The University Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill </publisher>
                <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace>
                <date>2006.</date>
                <availability status="unknown">
                    <p>© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina at
                        Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching and
                        personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the
                        text.</p>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <biblFull id="recording">
                    <recording type="audio" dur="01:03:58">
                        <p>MP3 file derived from WAV preservation master</p>
                    </recording>
                    <titleStmt>
                        <title type="recording">Oral History Interview with Eva Clayton, July 18,
                            1989. Interview C-0084. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007)</title>
                        <title type="series">Series C. Notable North Carolinians. Southern Oral
                            History Program Collection (C-0084)</title>
                        <author>Kathryn Nasstrom</author>
                    </titleStmt>
                    <extent>117 Mb</extent>
                    <publicationStmt>
                        <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, N. C.</pubPlace>
                        <publisher>Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina at
                            Chapel Hill</publisher>
                        <date>18 July 1989</date>
                        <authority/>
                    </publicationStmt>
                </biblFull>
                <biblFull>
                    <titleStmt>
                        <title type="transcript">Oral History Interview with Eva Clayton, July 18,
                            1989. Interview C-0084. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007)</title>
                        <title type="series">Series C. Notable North Carolinians. Southern Oral
                            History Program Collection (C-0084)</title>
                        <author>Eva Clayton</author>
                    </titleStmt>
                    <extent>28 p.</extent>
                    <publicationStmt>
                        <publisher>Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina at
                            Chapel Hill</publisher>
                        <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace>
                        <date>18 July 1989</date>
                        <authority/>
                    </publicationStmt>
                    <notesStmt>
                        <note anchored="no">Interview conducted on July 18, 1989, by Kathryn
                            Nasstrom; recorded in North Carolina.</note>
                        <note anchored="no"> Transcribed by Jovita Flynn.</note>
                        <note anchored="no"> Forms part of: Southern Oral History Program Collection
                            (#4007): Series C. Notable North Carolinians, Manuscripts Department,
                            University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</note>
                        <note anchored="no">Original transcript on deposit at the Southern
                            Historical Collection, The Wilson Library, University of North Carolina
                            at Chapel Hill.</note>
                    </notesStmt>
                </biblFull>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <projectDesc>
                <p>The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-Chapel Hill digital library, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South.</hi>
                </p>
            </projectDesc>
            <editorialDecl>
                <p>An audio file with the interview complements this electronic edition.</p>
                <p>The text has been entered using double-keying and verified against the original.</p>
                <p>The text has been encoded using the recommendations for Level 4 of the TEI in
                    Libraries Guidelines.</p>
                <p>Original grammar and spelling have been preserved. </p>
                <p>All quotation marks, em dashes and ampersand have been transcribed as entity
                    references.</p>
                <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as "</p>
                <p>All em dashes are encoded as —</p>
            </editorialDecl>
            <classDecl>
                <taxonomy id="lcsh">
                    <bibl>
                        <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings</title>
                    </bibl>
                </taxonomy>
                <taxonomy id="docsouth">
                    <bibl>
                        <title>Documenting the American South Topics</title>
                    </bibl>
                </taxonomy>
            </classDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
        <profileDesc>
            <langUsage>
                <language id="eng">English</language>
            </langUsage>
            <textClass>
                <keywords scheme="lcsh">

                    <list type="simple">
                        <item>
                            <!-- LC headings go here -->
                        </item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                <keywords scheme="docsouth">
                    <list type="main_topic">
                        <item>North Carolina<list type="sub-topic">
                                <item>Politics and Social Issues</item>
                            </list>
                        </item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
            </textClass>
        </profileDesc>
        <revisionDesc>
            <change>
                <date>2006-00-00, </date>
                <respStmt>
                    <name>Celine Noel, Wanda Gunther, and Kristin Martin</name>
                    <resp/>
                </respStmt>
                <item> revised TEIHeader and created catalog record for the electronic
                edition.</item>
            </change>
            <change>
                <date>2006-12-12, </date>
                <respStmt>
                    <name> Mike Millner </name>
                    <resp/>
                </respStmt>
                <item>finished TEI-conformant encoding and final proofing.</item>
            </change>
        </revisionDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text id="ohs_C-0084">
        <front>
            <div1 type="about_interview">
                <head>Interview with Eva Clayton, July 18, 1989. Interview C-0084.</head>
                <byline>Conducted by Kathryn Nasstrom</byline>
                <note type="deposit" anchored="no">
                    <p>Transcript on deposit at The Southern Historical Collection, The Louis Round
                        Wilson Library</p>
                </note>
                <note type="citation" anchored="no">
                    <p>Citation of this interview should be as follows: <lb/>“Interview
                        C-0084, in the Southern Oral History Program Collection #4007, <lb/>Southern
                        Historical Collection, The Wilson Library, <lb/>University of North Carolina
                        at Chapel Hill”</p>
                </note>
                <note type="copyright" anchored="no">Copyright © 2000 The University of
                    North Carolina</note>
            </div1>
            <div1 type="abstract">
                <head>Abstract</head>
                <p>Activist and politician Eva Clayton grew up as the daughter of a successful
                    insurance executive in Savannah, Georgia. She came with her husband to North
                    Carolina, and while raising four children and working toward advanced degrees,
                    she became a leading figure in the civil rights movement of the early 1960s. Her
                    activism experience drew her to service, and she spent years working with
                    economic and social development organizations in and out of North Carolina
                    government, including the Soul City Foundation and the Warren County Board of
                    Commissioners, on which she was serving at the time of this interview. Three
                    years later, in 1992, she would win a seat in the United States House of Representatives,
                    where she would serve until 2003. In this interview, Clayton remembers a career
                    spent in community development. In addition to helping lead the effort to
                    establish Soul City—an attempt to create a new kind of rural
                    community—she served as assistant secretary at the state Department
                    of Natural Resources and Community Development. This interview follows the
                    career of a successful black woman who sought to share her vision of economic
                    possibility and social progress with her community.</p>
            </div1>
            <div1 type="short_abstract">
                <head>Short Abstract</head>
                <p>Activist and politician Eva Clayton describes her years of service in and out of
                    politics in Warren County, North Carolina.</p>
            </div1>
        </front>
        <body>
            <div1 id="C-0084" type="sohp_interview">
                <head>Interview with Eva Clayton, July 18, 1989. <lb/>Interview C-0084. Southern
                    Oral History Program Collection (#4007)</head>
                <list type="simple">
                    <head>Interview Participants</head>
                    <item>
                        <name id="spk1" key="ec" reg="Clayton, Eva" type="interviewee">EVA
                        CLAYTON</name>, interviewee</item>
                    <item>
                        <name id="spk2" key="kn" reg="Nasstrom, Kathryn" type="interviewer">KATHRYN
                            NASSTROM</name>, interviewer</item>
                </list>
                <div2 id="tape1-a" n="1-A" type="tape_side">
                    <pb id="p1" n="1"/>
                    <head>[TAPE 1, SIDE A]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 1, SIDE A]</p>
                    </note>
                    <milestone n="7647" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:00:00"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>This is Kathy Nasstrom for the Southern Oral History Program interviewing
                            Eva Clayton on July 18, 1989. I'd like to begin with a general question
                            about family background and if there are particular family or
                            educational experiences you'd like to note here in terms of your
                            interest in civil rights and the commitments that you've shown and the
                            kinds of work you've taken on.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7647" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:00:37"/>
                    <milestone n="7610" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:00:38"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, let me just say a little bit about my background. I'm from a small
                            but relatively, [by] North Carolina sizes, relatively large community. I
                            was born in a place called Savannah, Georgia. Came from a typical small
                            family. There were only two of us, my brother and myself. My father was
                            in the insurance business, and I gather in some ways, though he was not
                            part owner, he was part of the leadership. He was insurance director for
                            the state of Georgia and had a staff of, I guess it was, 50 people. My
                            father only [had] an eighth grade education formally, but later went on
                            to take his GED and went to whatever they call the insurance institute.
                            So, he's what you call an itinerant business person. My mother, similar
                            situation, was a teacher but never graduated from college. She went to
                            normal college, which was in those days equivalent to a junior college.
                            One of the things that strikes me [about] both my parents is an undying
                            loyalty to one business. He worked for one company for forty-two years.
                            That's something I probably said I wasn't going to do. But also out of
                            that experience both my brother and I both said we were going to one day
                            own that insurance company.<pb id="p2" n="2"/> That didn't happen, but
                            anyhow, that was somewhat of a notion. My father was the kind, gentle,
                            patient, understanding person. My mother was understanding but very
                            demanding, high standards, workaholic, A-type, and probably, if [she]
                            ever had the education, could have been anything in the world she wanted
                            to be. And never doubted for a moment her abilities. Confident and
                            somewhat arrogant, knowing who she was, and that, but for color, she was
                            superior. So I had that knowledge. My mother also had the understanding
                            that her father was white, and she resented that. So in many ways I came
                            with that sort of understanding in my bones <note type="comment">
                                [unclear] </note>. Both of them wanted for their children to be <gap reason="unknown"/> and both of us did that. At first I wanted to be
                            a doctor——missionary. My ambition was to be a
                            missionary in Africa, and at that time in my life Albert Schweitzer was
                            the hero in my life. He was a genius; he was the philosopher; he was a
                            musician; he was a medicine man and also had a religious . . . You know,
                            if you've got to think of somebody you can be, why not pick the very
                            best? But that soon dissipated. So I went to college, with that kind of
                            preconceived notion which didn't materialize. And I don't think I've
                            lost that too much. I haven't gone to Africa but one day I will, but
                            under different circumstances other than being a missionary. So I think
                            that background and those original motivations are very much there.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7610" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:04:27"/>
                    <milestone n="7648" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:04:28"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>Would you recount briefly your post-high school education, the schools
                            you went to and the years you spent at those schools?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p3" n="3"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Well, I graduated from Johnson C. Smith as an undergraduate with a major
                            in biology and general science. At that time I thought I was going to be
                            a pre-med student. I got married and we came to Durham, and my husband's
                            in law school. While he's in law school, I'm in graduate school in
                            biology and did some research at the University of North Carolina. I was
                            in grad school at North Carolina Central. Had children, and didn't go to
                            school for a while after. I think I finished my master's, it's been so
                            long ago, 1963? I don't . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>1963?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>I think. And I'm not recalling this, but I think that's true. Then I
                            worked for the University of North Carolina in gastrionology for two and
                            a half years while my husband was . . . We lived in Durham a year after
                            that, too. We came to Warren County and again I taught school in the
                            nearby junior college. It was called Kittrell Junior College at that
                            time. It was a school affiliated with the church that I grew up with,
                            the AME Methodist Church. It's no longer in existence. I got involved in
                            civil rights. My husband was an attorney, at that time the only black
                            attorney in our county. I became interested in law school, so eventually
                            I went to law school. I went a year at North Carolina Central, and then
                            went a year at the University of North Carolina. Had my fourth child,
                            and that was the end of my law career. Those are the schools I attended
                            in between having children.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7648" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:06:42"/>
                    <milestone n="7611" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:06:43"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>As I was thinking about questions for this, I did sense that the time
                            line was that you had more or less gotten out of<pb id="p4" n="4"/>
                            college about the time that the civil rights movement, in terms of
                            sit-ins and protests, got rolling on college campuses.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>I was out, yeah, I was out.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>But then am I right you were working probably at UNC at that time?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Somewhat.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>Would you recount what you recall about what was going on with college
                            students at UNC at that point, what you remember from other North
                            Carolina communities, and your perspective on it, having just recently
                            finished college?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Although I was involved as an employee at UNC, I don't recall very much,
                            my recollection isn't very vivid as to what happened at UNC. I do recall
                            a little more of what happened at North Carolina Central, the students
                            in the marches and the protests in that area. I also recall when we
                            moved to Warren County . . . The movement takes a while, it goes in
                            waves, and so it may be in the college campus, [then] two years and
                            three years later it's in the communities themselves. In Warren County
                            you were about three or four years behind the student movement. There
                            was a movement in North Carolina called, I can't think of the name of
                            it, it was an adjunct of the NAACP, I cannot think of the name. But they
                            were college kids who worked to free, they called them freedom riders,
                            or . . . </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>Are you talking about SNCC?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>It wasn't SNCC. There was something indigenous to North Carolina. At any
                            rate, we requested for that youth leadership to come to Warren County
                            and they helped to mobilize<pb id="p5" n="5"/> marches and to inspire
                            and to work with the youth that were involved. So in addition to knowing
                            what the college kids did on North Carolina Central, I was intimately
                            involved with the high school kids who protested the local drugstore,
                            who protested [by] going to the various department stores, or those kind
                            of things. So I served as their advisor. But we also were assisted by
                            this youth organization I can't think of the name of, who assigned two
                            people to come to us and they stayed for I guess about four months. It
                            was the sort of thing young people did more than adults, but adults were
                            very supportive. I was there probably more than many other adults were.
                            But it was clearly a youth driven activity. I noticed your comments
                            about your interest in women earlier. I think women were not necessarily
                                <hi rend="i">the</hi> backbone, but they certainly probably
                            contributed far more of the sustaining power, meaning they were there to
                            provide the food, they were there to kind of be the extra protector.
                            They might not have been actually demonstrating, but you found as many
                            women around that drugstore, around the theater, just to be eyewitnesses
                            if something happened to their kids, or to their neighbor's kids. They
                            were the ones who not only provided the food, the transportation, went
                            to the rallies. Men did that too, but men weren't as present or ever
                            attentive to some of those details as . . . The movement didn't change
                            anything in society, similarly, like anything else that's going on in
                            the South, women tend to details, men don't. That's the nature of the
                            difference, and so it was there, too. There were men who stand out in my
                            mind in warren County in encouraging . . . I<pb id="p6" n="6"/> think if
                            not for those men, the women probably wouldn't have been as free to do
                            it. They were older men by and large. They were, I guess, the same
                            people who dictate in various churches. My church was outside of that
                            community, but I would suspect they were the same people who were the
                            deacons or stewards or things like that. You had older men and probably
                            all age women, but the older men stand up in my mind very vividly. There
                            was an individual woman who stood out in my mind, just as the epitome of
                            a classic woman who was black. She was in the insurance business and I
                            don't think that had anything to do with me selecting that, since my
                            father was. She had taught school and had left it to go into business,
                            and she stood out as doing something quite different from what women
                            were doing. They either were housewives, or they worked for someone, or
                            they were teaching school, or they were a secretary. Ransom, I think her
                            name was. And I think she was the first person that I knew of that ran
                            for local government that was black. She didn't win, but just stood in
                            my mind as being her own person, as being very independent. She wasn't
                            very well off. Her husband, I think, had been a cabinet maker and he
                            came from a long line of cabinet makers, so there was some distinction
                            about that. In fact, I think there's some architectural significance to
                            the Ransom cabinets, because I think . . . But she just exuded
                            independence, and being her own person.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7611" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:13:43"/>
                    <milestone n="7612" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:13:44"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>I'm interested as you describe this period of the early and middle
                            sixties in Warren County, if there are any particular events related to
                            civil rights that stand out in your mind. In<pb id="p7" n="7"/> some of
                            the larger communities, people might mention the time when Martin Luther
                            King came and spoke in Raleigh or there's certain dates that are
                            established as important. Is there any particular event or time that
                            stands out in your mind as important for Warren County?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Hmm. I think there are several, and I just think people go, as
                            communities go, through stages. I think the period of time, I can't
                            think of the years or the year, when there was so much unrest in the
                            streets, when the young people were protesting. And the powers that be
                            attempted to undermine the protest by trying to deputize the black men
                            who were around who were young. I thought that stood out as being a
                            desperate act, but also it stood out in mind as perhaps the peak of the
                            pressure by the young people. That they were so unable to control the
                            crowd that they had to resort to trying to use blacks to arrest their
                            own children. In fact, my husband was one they approached, and there was
                            a <gap reason="unknown"/> he was charged with failure to respond to the
                            deputy's call, or something. Anyhow, it was dealt with in the courts
                            like it should have been, and it was an attempt to frustrate and to
                            demean. That stood out. The other one, I
                            remember——not Martin coming to Warren
                            County——but I ran in 1968, and during 1968, in
                            May, if you'll recall, in 1968 we also had a black candidate for
                            governor, his name was Reginald Hawkins. He had scheduled a big rally in
                            eastern North Carolina and anyone in that particular area was also
                            invited and I had promised to join him and Martin Luther King in Wilson.
                            I was the only person in eastern North Carolina at that time running for
                            Congress, but the<pb id="p8" n="8"/> real motivation was to have the
                            person running for governor come to eastern North Carolina. Martin had
                            promised to come and to be the speaker, and so that was <gap reason="unknown"/>. The impact of that on Warren County I think was
                            significant. I think, indeed, it caused people to recognize how serious
                            the issues were. There are other areas in Warren County, I guess for the
                            purpose of your research, you're focusing on the demonstrations more
                            than you are.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7612" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:17:34"/>
                    <milestone n="7613" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:17:35"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>Except for more that I'm interested in what the dynamic was related to
                            civil rights in each community. It might have varied widely. So,
                            actually I'd be curious now about this 1968 period, because that, if I'm
                            right, launched your interest, at least formally, in electoral
                        politics.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Yeah, well, my being in congress, is a result of my activism in voting
                            registration. I had four, maybe three or four years, prior to that,
                            [when] my husband and I had helped voter registration workshops
                            throughout the county. And my husband had run.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, I wasn't aware of that. When did he run?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>He ran for the state house in 1964, probably '65, because you don't run
                            even years. So it was probably '65 and '67, or either '63 and '65, but
                            he had run twice. In fact the first time he ran he was able to call for
                            a runoff. He wasn't a leading candidate, but out of that effort and that
                            participation, I was encouraged to run for Congress. Now I didn't expect
                            to win, but I obviously you run to win. In fact I did considerably
                            better than I ever thought I would have, and probably if I knew all that
                            I know now I probably wouldn't have run. <note type="comment">
                                [Laughter] </note> I<pb id="p9" n="9"/> was really interested in
                            voter registration and they really needed someone, a candidate, to focus
                            that, to get people excited, why wouldn't you take the next step, if
                            you're really committed to voter registration? I learned an awful lot in
                            that process. I think I learned how important symbols were to people.
                            Voter registration in Warren County increased by 25 percent. Voter
                            registration in the second district increased by some 12 percent. It was
                            the highest significant registration increase they've ever had in either
                            the county or the district, even since then. But that still wasn't
                            sufficient enough to get blacks at a local level, or blacks
                            substantially at a regional level. I wasn't alone in running. I
                            indicated there was Reginald Hawkins running for governor, there were
                            persons running for county commissioners in our county and other
                            surrounding counties, [also] school boards. So there was an emerging
                            recognition that political participation was the way if you're going to
                            have equality, that you had to have people in positions to make the
                            decision. Now some of that was successful, some of it wasn't, but I
                            think there was a commitment by the leadership and people did take the
                            risk——yes, I'll be a candidate. Even when you knew
                            there was a possibility that you wouldn't be. I think that was there.</p>
                        <p>There was, in places like Warren County prior to my running and prior to
                            my coming to the county, just a great outward migration for very good
                            reasons. There's a book called <hi rend="i">Chickenbone Special</hi>. It
                            was about the trek from the south to the North for people to find jobs
                            and a better way of life. The<pb id="p10" n="10"/> event of our running,
                            or other people running, the community found just an outpouring of
                            people expressing hope that one day their communities would be the kind
                            of community where they could come back home. Now, all that hasn't
                            materialized, but the sense of pride that something happened somewhere.
                            So I think, those were some of the expectations and the feelings that
                            were going on during that time. After the 1968 involvement, I indicated
                            earlier that I had to learn a lot and I had gotten involved. My
                            involvement, my desire to want to be a missionary, is continued not in
                            terms of being a missionary, but my involvement in church. I received
                            substantial support both from several interdenominational [groups], as
                            well as some foundations. Groups said they'd help in voter registration.
                            There were sources out there available, there was a need, and we
                            organized something called Eastern North Carolina Development
                            Corporation, I think it's called, EDC, yeah, EDC, Economic Development
                            Corporation, Eastern North Carolina Development Corporation. Out of that
                            we established day cares throughout eastern North Carolina, and some of
                            those day cares are still there. In fact, there's an Eastern North
                            Carolina Day Care Association headed by Alice Ballance and one done in
                            Bertie County and Ahoskie, Battleboro, which grew out of that process,
                            which foundations had given. That was the social end of that. It was
                            harder to get a handle on the economics of it, but that's truly where it
                            is. Politics is the road to improve the economics. That has not happened
                            in the main, but why participate in politics if you're not trying to
                            improve the economics and liveability of the people<pb id="p11" n="11"/>
                            who are there? Surely there needed to be efforts, and there still need
                            to be efforts in working with ecomomic development in that area. I think
                            that's sufficient response to that question.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7613" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:24:16"/>
                    <milestone n="7614" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:24:17"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>Actually what you're saying there reminds me of, or several themes that
                            you've mentioned, tie in with what I know about Soul City, the vision of
                            economic development in rural areas and then, if I'm right in saying as
                            the Executive Director of Soul City Foundation, you had more work with
                            the social planning aspects of it, as opposed to the industrial area,
                            the building of the city. Is that right?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>That's correct. However, there was a time when the Soul City Foundation,
                            because it was a non-profit, could qualify for funds to do some
                            building. The building that's still there was called the Soul City
                            Company. The foundation received funds, built that as what they call an
                            incubator. The notion was that small business would have a place to
                            begin, to nurture, and to support each other, and then would go out into
                            the industrial park and establishments. That never materialized, but the
                            building was built by the Foundation. The company actually built the
                            city and planned the roads and proposed the houses and those kinds of
                            things. The Foundation was responsible for health care, was responsible
                            for the cultural programs in the area, the education, the day care
                            programs, and the one I indicated, the industrial incubator, but that's
                            the extent of its involvement.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>By saying that I may have jumped ahead of the story a bit because I think
                            it was in 1973 that you joined on with Soul City Foundation? Is that the
                            right year?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p12" n="12"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>Okay. What about the period from '68 to '73?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>From '68 to '71, I was still actively involved in the organization that
                            was called Eastern North Carolina Economic Development Corporation,
                            establishing the day care programs and the social programs that we had.
                            And '71 to '73 I was with the University of North Carolina heading up
                            their health/manpower program, which was a consortium of schools located
                            at UNC for the purpose of encouraging minority students to go into
                            health careers. I served as director of that. Then the Foundation
                            opportunity came after <note type="comment"> [unclear] </note> came to
                            Warren County. In fact, he had come earlier. My husband was involved in
                            identifying the land and the acquisition of that, so we were aware even
                            when I went to UNC that that may be an opportunity. The Foundation
                            opportunity came in 1973, when I joined the Foundation to work with them
                            for a while.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>And what brought you to that position, what attracted you about working
                            for Soul City?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, there was a lot to attract us to Soul City. Soul City probably is an
                            idea that is <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> probably still too
                            young, and it's ahead of its time, but it's still an idea that's
                            worthwhile. Oh, it was visionary, it was bold, it had the concept,
                            though not the financial backing as it turned out, to be a stimulus to
                            turn around that kind of a rural area. What you were going to do, you
                            were going to bring to bear, in a rural area, urban types of
                            interactions, economic opportunities, and you were going to put in place
                            facilities for persons to be<pb id="p13" n="13"/> recruited anywhere.
                            You were going to have houses, you were going to have the shops, you
                            were going to possibly have the schools. Soul City was proposed as a new
                            town development that would be located in a rural area. So it first had
                            to carve out what would be those local government structures that it
                            would have. It never became a city, or a town, but the local government
                            structure it proposed was to be a——can't think of
                            the name of it. But it's a limited purpose government, and a limited
                            purpose government allow you to build streets, to do the sewage and do
                            the water. In the meantime, they would work through the county. Well,
                            the dynamics of working at that time, through the county commissions was
                            controlled by, most, well, all men, no doubt about that, because I'm the
                            first woman ever to be there. And all white, and usually older men, who
                            were in the traditional power structure. [They] felt threatened by this,
                            felt that here's this new <gap reason="unknown"/> going to spend all
                            this money. they resented the fact that they [Soul City planners] were
                            able to get monies for water and sewage and roads in many instances,
                            when they weren't able, or hadn't tried or whatever. And secondly,
                            didn't believe that blacks could plan anything. But amazingly the
                            community did indeed. The idea was bold enough to attract both white and
                            black, was bold enough to attract extremely talented people. In fact it
                            attracted me, you know, I had no doubt about that. If I look now at the
                            people who went to Soul City, one is now the dean of Mehary Medical
                            School, one was the Assistant Secretary of Commerce here, the person who
                            first came to do the health went back to Cook Hospital, which is the
                                largest<pb id="p14" n="14"/> hospital in the country. So the
                            boldness of bringing health services, bringing economic development, was
                            an idea that was very exciting to a lot of people. The foundations were
                            interested, the University of North Carolina received <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> probably more than the Soul City
                            Foundation did, a lot of foundation money to do all kinds of studies on
                            that. At least three research people who have talked about Soul City,
                            there are books now.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>Yes. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note></p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>So the idea's without its equal in a community that was that depressed.
                            However, that experience did teach me a couple things. As bold as the
                            idea is, and as imaginative as you can think you would have in
                            motivating and inspiring, you also need to have a politics and the
                            money. And if you have the politics, I think you can get the money. I
                            don't mean politics in the sense of black politics, but politics in the
                            sense of whoever's in power willing to take that risk. And that was not
                            there consistently, you know, when the pressure got too hot or . . .
                        </p>
                    </sp>
                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>[END OF TAPE 1, SIDE A]</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                </div2>
                <div2 id="tape1-b" n="1-B" type="tape_side">
                    <head>[TAPE 1, SIDE B]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 1, SIDE B]</p>
                    </note>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p> . . . saying that the pressure came and there was not the consistent
                            political support. The pressure came in the form of an audit, a GAO
                            [General Accounting Office] audit that was intense and thorough and
                            humiliating, and all kinds of accusations with that. Didn't find one
                            unallowable cost. They found some areas where they said there could have
                            been [better] management. What Soul City was doing, and the complexity
                            of what it was doing——it was an excellent audit in
                            terms of that. But because it didn't have the consistent political
                            support at the national level and at the local level, the first
                            opportunity to pull the support financially. And that was so tenuous, it
                            was so tenuous on good will and public acceptance. Of course, all
                            business in the long run is related to markets, no question about that,
                            but you need to have a support sufficient enough to try an idea. If it's
                            a new idea, why do you think you're going to be able to implement it
                            overnight? Soul City didn't have the time, it didn't have the consistent
                            political support. It didn't suffer from ideas, it didn't suffer from
                            leadership, it didn't suffer for a need, and, in my judgment, the
                            project is still an economic advantage to our country and it will become
                            even a greater economic advantage to our country.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>By that you mean what has remained behind, even though the city never was
                            built on that land?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Right. Although the city itself was never there. You have the
                            infrastructure there that's going to be supportive to businesses in the
                            future. You have the infrastructure there that<pb id="p16" n="16"/> has
                            caused economic development to happen in the whole region. Soul City
                            organized the first regional water system in this state, it's the
                            largest one now. And so Oxford has benefitted, Henderson's benefitted,
                            and Warren County's benefitted, far more than Soul City itself
                            benefitted. In fact, that was the compromise. Soul City came up with the
                            idea of tapping the lake with the water. No one else had thought of
                            that. The embarrassment of that. And what you have to do with the
                            politics of that. It started off with, what makes sense, to bring
                            infrastructure here, rather than create the wealth. So that turned out
                            to be a very positive thing and it continuously has been and will
                            continue to be economic development for the region. Now for our
                            particular community of Warren County, the industrial development that's
                            there——we have Owens Illinois, Nikrecho, I can
                            never think of its new name, it was so quiet last year, its name is
                            Nikrecho, I think. Owens Illinois moved there knowing it had water, it
                            had streets, it was an industrial base. There is evidence it is now
                            serving as an economic incentive to our county.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>I'm thinking too in some ways we've gone a little bit ahead of the story
                            here, too, in the sense that,</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>It's hard for me to live in the past. I wouldn't be doing all the things
                            I'm doing if I had such vivid memories of the past.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>That's why I'm the one with the timeline in front of me. <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> I'm thinking that you left while
                            it was still very much a going concern. Is that right? In terms of your
                                primary<pb id="p17" n="17"/> focus, you left for state government in
                            '75, so all of this in terms of the audit was in the late '70s. If Soul
                            City was still very much a going concern when you left, what was it that
                            pulled you away into state government?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>It was an opportunity to do something different and I am one open to new
                            opportunities. And I grow by a variety of things and I think that's what
                            makes Eva Clayton unique. And the opportunity was for me to be in the
                            cabinet, or sub-cabinet, of Jim Hunt, and I was offered that opportunity
                            and they asked if I would consider it and I said, yes, and I did.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>And an interest in working with Howard Lee, I take it was part of it,
                            too?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Oh, sure, sure. And he was the one that made the offer. Yes, yes. That
                            was a particular delight. Howard Lee in 1972 ran for Congress, and again
                            in 1974. And in 1976 he ran for Lieutenant Governor. And both in '74 and
                            in '76, I worked with his campaign. I also worked in '76 with Jim Hunt's
                            campaign. My husband was the county-wide co-chair during that. So those
                            relationships meant that at least my name was there and some opportunity
                            for a contribution in the providing of services to the state of North
                            Carolina. I thought that as a challenge, you know. I'm pleased that I
                            did it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7614" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:38:27"/>
                    <milestone n="7649" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:38:28"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>It seems that when I think of what was going on in the Department at this
                            point, a lot of it was, at least from reading the newspapers, very
                            controversial things. The funding of CETA [Comprehensive Education and
                            Training Act] and where the money went and that sort of thing, all of
                            which is documented to the<pb id="p18" n="18"/> hilt in the newspapers.
                            But I'm wondering if you would, perhaps more looking back on it than on
                            day-to-day parts of it, describe what were important issues in that time
                            for you in terms of what the Department was trying to do, what it
                            accomplished, what it was up against, those sorts of things.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>It accomplished a lot, but in fact what's controversial is amazing. You
                            do get caught up in the day-to-day, being written about or wondering,
                            gee whiz, what's under the dome today, or what's in the editorial pages
                            today. And CETA was certainly the, I don't know if it was a watershed,
                            but it certainly was the whipping boy. And you know, and I do have some
                            introspection about all of that. I don't know why I should be surprised,
                            but I was. It just didn't work, to make victims of poor folks and black
                            folks. Howard Lee is the Secretary of Natural Resources. What does it
                            have? It has community economic development, and I'm guessing this now,
                            but I roughly would say, at least 50-60 million dollars. You had the
                            Office of Economic Opportunity, or OEO; you had community assistance;
                            and you had housing finance in that area. Those four were under
                            community development, and I served as community development. All the
                            things I love to do, all the things I wanted to do, and was consistent
                            with my missionary zeal. Who are you helping? Where does that money go
                            to? Who are the recipients? Okay. Big money in CETA, big money in CETA,
                            big money in CETA. Money coming down so fast and many times you have to
                            send money back. You're knowing people in natural resources, including
                            land resources, environmental management, and I think maybe<pb id="p19" n="19"/> recreation. You didn't hear anything about those programs.
                            Parks were going to pot just like anything else, I mean, look at the
                            parks now. Nothing, it's almost like they were silent partners. But
                            community development, you heard a lot about. CETA, so you heard more
                            about that than about housing finance, and community assistance, they
                            were of planners, you didn't hear too much about them. But CETA and OEO,
                            yeah, there was a lot. A lot of press, but by and large that press was
                            about two or three events. And the press is selling papers, I mean, I
                            have journalists who work for me now, you know my niece is a journalist.
                            They are taught to get a story. Success doesn't sell any papers. They
                            won't admit that they try to find the negative, but it's far more
                            exciting to talk about community development under CETA when you have
                            the possibility of the union head having a contract. Probably was
                            nothing wrong with that in the first place, I mean, it was a non-profit
                            organization. What was wrong [was] it wasn't managed well. It wasn't any
                            impropriety on who got it, but it made for good reading, you know. My
                            reflection on that, yes, there was a lot of controversy on that, but gee
                            whiz, do I regret having been in the midst of that controversy? Not one
                            bit. I love saying I looked you in the eye and didn't blink. David Stick
                            is one who has chronicled a lot of stuff about Eva Clayton, and I don't
                            mind David Stick because we know exactly where we stand. He wants to
                            write a story and I want to get the facts right. I don't know what his
                            motives are, but I can tell you he's a very good reporter. He's the one
                            that did Soul City, and I couldn't help believe that part<pb id="p20" n="20"/> of my popularity in state government was indeed related to
                            my being connected to Soul City. I don't think that was the reason I was
                            chosen, it was just the reason why there was a good press. It makes for
                            good reading. There was a contract made to the foundation which I had
                            headed up. Even I allowed myself to think that there was some conflict
                            in that. Now I know absolutely not there. If people can put money in
                            blind trusts and still participate in housing and million and million
                            dollars . . . The foundation for which I worked, for which I have no
                            control, makes an application for forty-eight thousand dollars and I
                            must not sign, in fact I did not sign. The problem is that I signed the
                            amendments, but the contract was signed by somebody else. But I
                            shouldn't have had to avoid signing in the first place. The things they
                            put a black female, or first time black male, through in proving their
                            worthiness, is just completely unacceptable. What do I remember about
                            that? That's what I remember about that. Not about the controversy. In
                            some ways, I'm not so dumbfounded by the fact that the press would do
                            that, as I am dumbfounded by my not recognizing that it would do that.
                                <note type="comment"> [Laughter] </note> I mean, what else is new? I
                            guess if I had not been dumbfounded, I would have been so cynical in
                            that process. You know, you would still think, gee whiz, there should be
                            a fair chance for people to do that.</p>
                        <p>But, what were our successes? We got money out to a variety of
                            communities. We made small grants for water and sewage they would never
                            have had. There are towns that are involved right now that have parks
                            and all. Through CETA funds the state and<pb id="p21" n="21"/> the local
                            units governments got far more of the CETA than anyone else. I don't
                            want to say they supplant it, but they certainly undergird their
                            employment assistance by funds that the federal government had that they
                            didn't have. I think the program needed changing, and I think the
                            program is better than it was then. That was a good experience for me,
                            it was really a good experience, both career-wise as well as human
                            relations-wise.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>It was in 1981 that you resigned, about the end of the year, late
                            November. What were your reasons for leaving the departent?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>A couple reasons. One is that I didn't think I wanted to do another four
                            years. And the reason I had come to that
                            conclusion——I knew I made a contribution, I had no
                            problems with that, and I must say, both Howard and the governor allowed
                            me to make that contribution. But there were levels of frustration that
                            were unacceptable for me, not necessarily by any one person, just by the
                            nature of the beast, you know. And I guess I've always thought I was
                            arrogant enough, and rich enough, I didn't have to take certain <gap reason="unknown"/>. And, I thought I made a contribution, and four
                            years is a good time and sometimes you can overstay. And I had an urge
                            to go into business. I gather if it was easier I might have stayed full
                            term, but I think in hindsight that was a blessing for me to have left
                            that early, just get on about the business of doing . . . I had an
                            interesting story related to me by a person who had to work in the mills
                            during the summer through college, no, the person had to work in tobacco
                            before they went to college, and then while they were in college had
                                to<pb id="p22" n="22"/> work in the mills. And each of those things
                            were so hideous and unacceptable, that reaffirmed in their mind why they
                            had to finish college. So sometimes, when things are not as acceptable
                            to you, it's a blessing. I'm a great believer in the provential guidance
                            of God, and you know, sometimes those things come to test you. Hey, this
                            is a good time to get on about what you're about, anyhow. So it was an
                            opportunity to just move on. It wasn't any direct relationship to any
                            one person. It was just <hi rend="i">I</hi> did not feel that Eva
                            Clayton had to go through any enormous amount of headaches to say,
                            "I made my first, I made first." That's no longer
                            important to me, to be the first. It's factual, I was the first black
                            female that ever was Assistant Secretary in a department of North
                            Carolina. But, to have that distinction, to make a contribution under
                            certain conditions that were unacceptable to me as a person, I'm a
                            person before I'm an official. I live with my own dignity, so it was an
                            opportunity to keep all of that in contact, and still make a
                            contribution.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>And then your next step was right here, to Technical Resources
                            International. And what you've said affirms something that I'd guessed,
                            which is that this has been probably been brewing at least as an idea
                            for some time, [that is] to go about what you wanted to do in a private
                            organization where you could direct and control it.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>It's no different, however, from what I did in the foundations or . . .
                            It's all about empowering people and providing opportunities.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7649" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:51:20"/>
                    <milestone n="7615" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:51:21"/>
                    <pb id="p23" n="23"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>From your resume, to me that's quite clear, because in each of the things
                            that you've listed the descriptions end up sounding quite similar in
                            terms of the kinds of projects that you've worked on and what your goals
                            are. So then my question is, did you feel that in a private organization
                            which you controlled, you would be able to direct these things a lot
                            more? You would not have the outside forces that come at you in state
                            government or electoral politics, you would have control over what you
                            wanted to do?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>It certainly was. Not that it always resulted in that, but the motivation
                            was that you have the independence that you don't have in the others.
                            Also I was interested in going in business for the economics of going
                            into business. I was interested in making money. I was interested in
                            demonstrating that economic development could mean that you could
                            demonstrate how you have a business and you hire other people. It's the
                            self-determination. And I think that's symbolic. I think what you do as
                            a person is symbolic of what your community will do, or individuals will
                            do, and I've been honored by a number of persons sharing with me that I
                            have been their model. My striking out has caused other women to do the
                            same thing, or even other men, other small businesspeople, to do that. I
                            haven't made a lot of money, oftentimes I have more debt than I have
                            income. It's not a nonprofit, I can't write it off. But more times than
                            not I have fun, more times than not. I wouldn't be coming from Warrenton
                            all the way to Raleigh, or going all over eastern North Carolina doing
                            what I do if I didn't enjoy it. I'm going to<pb id="p24" n="24"/> change
                            it, though, I'm going to try to work a little smarter, not as hard. I
                            read this book, <hi rend="i">Passages</hi>, you know you go through
                            these passages in your life. I'm not in my less mobile passage, but I am
                            in my more thoughtful passage where you maximize your time and you spend
                            somewhat less energies working on that.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7615" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:54:07"/>
                    <milestone n="7650" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:54:08"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>It's been eight years now, here, is that right? What are the major
                            projects that you've worked on, during these eight years?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Hmmm. The ones that probably have been most esteemed financially have
                            been writing applications for local government that would enable them to
                            do community development. I've had larger numbers of those, and in some
                            ways, that has provided them the funds to do the streets, the water, and
                            the housing. The other major type, that's been small businesses, a
                            couple stand in my mind. One, a factory down in Windsor <gap reason="unknown"/>, which employs forty-five people. They own that
                            factory, and for me to be involved in getting money to expand that.
                            Another was an acquisition of a business up here near the airport which
                            started off maybe about ninety thousand dollars. They had a sale amount
                            of four million last year. Another research area type, I've worked with
                            a number of banks in doing credit need studies. What motivates them to
                            use us in the first place is the CRA, the Credit Community Reinvestment
                            Act, which says that local communities should benefit from banks being
                            in their communities. Are you investing in that community? They engaged
                            us to do credit needs studies particularly around lower-income, because
                            we've been very active in community development and in the <gap reason="unknown"/> area. That has been of<pb id="p25" n="25"/>
                            particular interest to me. We've done a lot of that. We've done studies
                            looking at the roles of minority credit unions in rural eastern North
                            Carolina, or doing economic development. More recently we've looked at
                            the effect of Richmond vs. Kroson, the effect of Kroson on affirmative
                            action in the programs in municipalities throughout North Carolina. We
                            just finished that. Those are some of the things we've been involved in.
                            More of our clients are small units of governments, who couldn't afford
                            a planner, or they would be banks who need to have a legitimate entity
                            doing their credit need studies rather than themselves (because they're
                            certainly capable of doing their credit needs), or they've been hiring
                            people other than a research firm such as ours. So we do social research
                            and some special issues in those areas. Those have been the kinds of
                            things we're working on.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>With these eight years under your belt doing this, would you comment on
                            the relative success of doing what you want to do through a private
                            organization versus a large state agency.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>It's in a different arena. I think I have far more legitimacy among
                            certain people now than I might have had before. The participation at
                            the state level gave me far more visibility. I'm not as confident
                            everyone feels that people that get appointed to head up the, have all
                            the experiences of <gap reason="unknown"/>. But I really enjoyed having
                            had the opportunity to make that public contribution to the state
                            agency. I wouldn't take anything from it. The sense I have here, I feel
                            I'm in control. And I'm in a small arena. I'm not statewide and my
                            clients are<pb id="p26" n="26"/> maybe ten or twelve communities and
                            governments, over a two-year period. And we may have five banks that are
                            our clients over another two-year period. So we're dealing with smaller
                            people, but the people we are dealing with, the entities we are dealing
                            with, we feel we are freer to make that personal contribution without
                            the constraint of the political implications of who we help. Now all
                            things have constraints, you know, so we all have to work with
                            constraints. But having had both of them, I wouldn't trade one for the
                            other, but I'm glad where I am. I'm at the right place in my life. I
                            wouldn't say I wouldn't go back to public life, but I think I'm at the
                            right place.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7650" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:59:28"/>
                    <milestone n="7616" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:59:29"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>We've got a little bit of time left, so I'd like you to comment on your
                            continued work in electoral politics, in this case through serving on
                            the County Commissioners Board in Warren County, because it seems that
                            almost exactly as you were coming to do the work here, you were also
                            establishing yourself in that area of politics.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Serving Warren County commissioners has been a particularly unique
                            experience. Warren County is a rural county. It has many problems and
                            limited resources. And Eva Clayton has served as chairperson for that,
                            this is six going into seven years. We have made a tremendous impact on
                            that community. However, being a Eva Clayton or having a majority black
                            on the board, does not change the reality that Warren County still has
                            tremendous problems. Local units of governments are facing just
                            tremendous amount of demands, with increasingly less resources to come
                            from the federal government, so they're<pb id="p27" n="27"/> going to
                            have to overburden what is already a limited base to build
                            jails——we're building a jail, we're renovating our
                            courthouse, we're building a new middle school. We had the largest bond
                            referendum ever in our county, ever in the history of our county,
                            because we had so many needs, and the citizens supported it. But we
                            still have to struggle, to try to find how do we increase that base. I
                            think minorities serving at the local level is there, there's
                            opportunity there. I have had that opportunity and I think have made a
                            contribution in that. So I'm pleased about that. Where I go from here, I
                            think that's an open question. I haven't yet decided whether I'm going
                            to run again. I think eight years may be enough, but I would encourage
                            other people to serve at the local level. I think it's an area where you
                            need talented people. Now I don't say that as arrogant as it sounds, but
                            I did bring a certain level of expertise. I've worked in local
                            government, I was a chief planner for the state as the community
                            development assistant, so planning's what I do here. So I'm constantly
                            reading regulations and those kind of things. But there is not enough
                            persons willing to serve on local unit government who have the talent.
                            In fact, in my judgment I'm not personally willing to serve in public
                            positions who have the talent anyhow <gap reason="unknown"/>. It's
                            almost as if the talented people say, hey, I don't have to take that
                            abuse, you know, I don't want to get involved. So what happens when that
                            attitude prevails is you are governed by less skillful, less experienced
                            persons when the skillful and experienced people are too busy doing
                            their thing, and walk away. It's uncompensated service.<pb id="p28" n="28"/> Warren County doesn't have the resources to compensate
                            anyone, so you don't go there thinking you're gong to supplement your
                            income, you're really going to lose income, because you're going to have
                            to give so much of your time. But it's an area that needs to be done,
                            and I think it's an area that gives tremendous rewards, because you can
                            see it, you can see it. When that school is built I will see it, when
                            that courthouse is, I will see it. Also, when they don't pick up the
                            trash, I'll see that, and plus everyone knows my telephone number. You
                            get the complaints immediately, but you also get the benefits, I
                        think.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7616" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="01:03:39"/>
                    <milestone n="7651" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="01:03:40"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>I see that we probably just have a little bit of time left. Is there
                            anything you'd want to add or elaborate on comments made so far?</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Hmm. I think not.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">KATHRYN NASSTROM:</speaker>
                        <p>Okay. Thanks very much.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">EVA CLAYTON:</speaker>
                        <p>Okay.</p>
                    </sp>
                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>END OF INTERVIEW</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                    <milestone n="7651" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="01:03:58"/>
                </div2>
            </div1>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI.2>
