Coming to terms with issues of racism and beginning to speak out
Dabbs explains how her husband, James McBride Dabbs, became interested in issues of racial injustice. She begins by describing how he was raised to believe that the race question had been solved by the Civil War and that racial stereotypes of African American inferiority had validity. Despite this indoctrination, Dabbs's husband was also taught to believe that civility and manners towards others were of paramount concern. By the 1940s, Dabbs grew to see legislative efforts to prevent African Americans from registering to vote as a violation of southern codes of civility and he began to speak out publicly about racial injustices. Dabbs's description of her husband's personal evolution in perceiving racism as a social justice to be battled is indicative of how some people began to come to terms with issues of race in the Jim Crow South over the course of the early twentieth century.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Edith Mitchell Dabbs, October 4, 1975. Interview G-0022. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- ELIZABETH JACOWAY BURNS:
-
When did James start becoming aware of his concern about race
relations?
- EDITH MITCHELL DABBS:
-
Well, he wasn't concerned about that. He grew up, he said, and
… he goes through all of that in several of his books,
particularly the first one, The Southern Heritage and
in I'm Going Home, too. Some of it comes
out in there, although he's not discussing that kind of
thing. I'm Going Home is a spiritual
autobiography and he is much more concerned with what he called the
"spiritual oddessy than …
[END OF TAPE 1, SIDE A]
[TAPE 1, SIDE B]
[START OF TAPE 1, SIDE B]
- EDITH MITCHELL DABBS:
-
… that sort of thing. You asked me when he became aware of
that. He didn't actually. When he was growing up, as he said
a number of times, there was no race question. He never heard it
discussed by people; they assumed that was settled by the war. The
Negroes were slaves and then they weren't. That settled it.
And, they had their place and we had ours and we were polite to them,
they didn't have the advantages we had and they
didn't have the things. They didn't have a lot of
capabilites that we had, but they were people and you were
nice to them. You were never rude to them because they
could not talk back, they could not defend themselves, they had to be
like children not able to talk back to their parents. You had to
consider all of that. Manners were very important to him. He was taught
that from the beginning. But he assumed that those things were taken
care of and he was very much surprised in later years to find that
people were still talking about it, talking about it again. The thing
wasn't quite settled, you know. But what got him into the
thick of things was the matter of manners. He had minded his own
business and never … he had so much to do with his literary
career, he had his teaching and his courses and that he was not
concerned with political matters, and he would have said with
sociological matters, anything except what he was doing. Only with
studying, scholarly matters,
- ELIZABETH JACOWAY BURNS:
-
He taught at Coker College?
- EDITH MITCHELL DABBS:
-
Yes and he taught English at Carolina before that. Well, shortly after we
came out here, I can't remember the dates, he always
remembered them exactly on everything, but anyhow, there was a time when
a session of the legislature stayed over time to debate and then vote
itself … about all they did that session was to vote itself
an increase in salary. Oh, they did that … now wait a minute.
No. Maybe I am combining things that weren't supposed to be
combined …it seemed to me that that happened at the same
session when they did do another thing. They spent the whole time trying
to figure out how permanently to disenfranchise the Negroes, keep them
completely out of politics and keep them back where they had been in
Wade Hampton's day. James watched the papers for several days
and then he began to boil and boil because here were these people who
were supposed to be, they were the political leaders of the state for
better or worse and they were all we had and that
was the example that they were setting. Right out loud in the house, in
the legislature, with all the news media we had there. They were
proclaiming to all of the state, including the Negroes, that they did
not intend to consider the Negroes first-class citizens or to give them
any chance to become that. James said that you had always been unfair to
the Negro without admitting it or realizing it but you had never stood
up told about it and said so and flaunted it. This, all of a sudden, was
terrible manners. He was just scandalized by it. He sat down and wrote a
scorching letter to the State saying what he thought
about it and then, the lines were drawn.
- ELIZABETH JACOWAY BURNS:
-
To the Columbia State.
- EDITH MITCHELL DABBS:
-
Yes, the Columbia State.
- ELIZABETH JACOWAY BURNS:
-
Was that in about 1905?
- EDITH MITCHELL DABBS:
-
No, no. That was after we came from Coker, that was in the forties, I
guess, because it was after he came out here.
- ELIZABETH JACOWAY BURNS:
-
O.K., I thought that you said the issue was disfranchisement?
- EDITH MITCHELL DABBS:
-
Well, it was, but they were trying to keep the Negro—to keep
Negroes from voting as much as possible and to keep them out of the
Democratic convention. They could not have any places of responsibility
and they spent the whole time trying to figure how they could keep the
Negroes from voting and what kind of roadblocks they could construct.
The poll tax had been one. There were lots of things that they wanted
bad enough and that they could think up. They spent their time doing
that and telling everybody about it, as though the Negroes who were
looking or listening to it like everybody else, seeing them do it, were
just furniture, you know, not people who had minds of their own or any
feelings. They were afraid that we had lost ground
entirely too much and that Negroes were beginning to want to vote rather
seriously in some numbers and they couldn't have that, they
wanted to do something about it. Of course, James was so brash that
about the next year or so, when election year came up, he was something,
I don't know what, a delegate from this precinct into the
county. And at the county meeting, in preparation for the state
convention, he suggested that we elect some black man to be a
representative. Well, I was glad to see him get home in one piece
because some of them couldn't take that. And he continued to
do what they considered outrageous things.