Justifications for supporting Talmadge and Carmichael in the Georgia gubernatorial election of 1947
Johnson discuses the political run-off between James Carmichael and Eugene Talmadge during the gubernatorial election of 1947. Johnson explains that although many people she worked with on social welfare issues supported Talmadge because of his approach to economics, she privately supported Carmichael because he seemed the more liberal of the two. (Johnson notes here that she could not take a public stance on political issues during these years; her work with the Georgia Conference on Social Welfare necessitated that she remain nonpartisan publicly.)
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Guion Griffis Johnson, July 1, 1974. Interview G-0029-4. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- GUION JOHNSON:
-
I asked a leading social worker in Savannah why it was that most of the
influential people in Savannah were supporting Talmadge instead of
Carmichael for governor? She said, "I'm going to support
Talmadge." I said, "You are? Why?"
"For the same reasons that the members of my Board are
supporting Talmadge."
- MARY FREDERICKSON:
-
Her Board in Savannah?
- GUION JOHNSON:
-
Yes, her Board in Savannah. She was director of the Department of Public
Welfare. She said, "Because we think that economic stability
will be maintained in Georgia if Talmadge is elected rather than
Carmichael. We do not think that Carmichael has the backing of the
Southern Bell Telephone Company, the Trust Company of Georgia, the
railroad, all the big economic interests, the mills".
(although, you know, I think that Carmichael was a mill owner. I know
that Ellis Arnold was a lawyer for the mill in Newnan.). "And
that is the reason. We think that it is important for Georgia to be
maintained strong economically and we think that we can suffer through a
Talmadge regime without the threat of an economic depression. Remember,
the war is over and we don't know what is going to happen after the war
is over. We may have an economic collapse. And we do not think under
Talmadge it will, and after all, Talmadge is a charitable man. He is a
leader in his church. He is a humanitarian. He is not a wicked man. This
is only a political tactic that he is using to get in. He doesn't hate
Negroes. He has paid for the college education of
his cook's son. They are devoted to him. The Negroes in Albany support
Talmadge." And I found this to be true. A Negro doctor from
Albany, he was the first Negro [man] that I got on my Board, and he
said, "Yes, we will have to support Talmadge."
- MARY FREDERICKSON:
-
Was his reason economic stability?
- GUION JOHNSON:
-
Yes.
- MARY FREDERICKSON:
-
Now, where did you fit politically? Were you involved in politics? Could
you afford to be?
- GUION JOHNSON:
-
I could not afford to be, and was not very much . . . I would go to small
group meetings, closed meetings, and say, "I'm doing this not
as Director of the Georgia Conference on Social Welfare, but as Guion
Johnson, very much interested in a liberal regime in Georgia and I will
give you the names of key leaders and I will help you in that way . . .
"
- MARY FREDERICKSON:
-
For Carmichael?
- GUION JOHNSON:
-
Yes, for Carmichael. And I soon found that I knew more key leaders than
the top management in the Carmichael campaign. "I will give you
names of key leaders, but I cannot have any publicity." Then, I
opened the Atlanta Constitution [one morning] and saw
a full page ad with names, oh, at least it looked like a thousand names
endorsing Carmichael, and here was my name in the group. And I had not
been asked permission for my name to be used, and I was very much
distraught, because I did not know what my Board would do. We were not
supposed to engage in politics. I could promote social and economic
issues for the health and welfare of the state, but I could not
participate in any political activity. I did not have one word, none of
them said anything.
- MARY FREDERICKSON:
-
Were they supporting him also?
- GUION JOHNSON:
-
I doubt it. I would guess that most members of my Board were supporting
Talmadge. A few spoke outright in his behalf, in Carmichael's behalf,
but most of them . . .
- MARY FREDERICKSON:
-
Was Carmichael a real liberal?
- GUION JOHNSON:
-
Probably not. He was not an Ellis Arnold liberal, but he had been chosen
by Ellis Arnold to succeed him as the most liberal of the potential
candidates. He had very little political experience, I think. That's my
recollection.