<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite_sohp_ms.dtd">
<TEI.2>
    <teiHeader type="Southern Oral History Project" status="new">
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title type="main">
                    <hi rend="bold">Oral History Interview with Terry Sanford, December 18, 1990.
                        Interview L-0050. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007):</hi>
                    Electronic Edition. </title>
                <title type="descriptive">Terry Sanford Discusses Civil Rights, Higher Education,
                    and the Leadership of Anne Queen at the University of North Carolina </title>
                <author>
                    <name id="st" reg="Sanford, Terry" type="interviewee">Sanford, Terry</name>,
                    interviewee </author>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Interview conducted by </resp>
                    <name id="cc" reg="Cheatham, Cindy" type="interviewer">Cheatham, Cindy</name>
                </respStmt>
                <funder>Funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services supported the
                    electronic publication of this interview.</funder>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
                    <name id="jdj">Jennifer Joyner</name>
                </respStmt>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Sound recordings digitized by </resp>
                    <name id="as">Aaron Smithers</name>
                    <name id="sfc">Southern Folklife Collection</name>
                </respStmt>
            </titleStmt>
            <editionStmt>
                <edition>First edition, <date>2007</date>
                </edition>
            </editionStmt>
            <extent>46.5 Kb</extent>
            <publicationStmt>
                <publisher>The University Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill </publisher>
                <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace>
                <date>2007.</date>
                <availability status="unknown">
                    <p>© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina at
                        Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching and
                        personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the
                        text.</p>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <biblFull id="recording">
                    <recording type="audio" dur="00:30:41">
                        <p>MP3 file derived from WAV preservation master, which was derived from
                            original analog cassettes.</p>
                    </recording>
                    <titleStmt>
                        <title type="recording">Oral History Interview with Terry Sanford, December
                            18, 1990. Interview L-0050. Southern Oral History Program Collection
                            (#4007)</title>
                        <title type="series">Series L. University of North Carolina. Southern Oral
                            History Program Collection (L-0050)</title>
                        <author>Cindy Cheatham</author>
                    </titleStmt>
                    <extent>56.2 Mb</extent>
                    <publicationStmt>
                        <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, N. C.</pubPlace>
                        <publisher>Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina at
                            Chapel Hill</publisher>
                        <date>18 December 1990</date>
                        <authority/>
                    </publicationStmt>
                </biblFull>
                <biblFull id="transcript">
                    <titleStmt>
                        <title type="transcript">Oral History Interview with Terry Sanford, December
                            18, 1990. Interview L-0050. Southern Oral History Program Collection
                            (#4007)</title>
                        <title type="series">Series L. University of North Carolina. Southern Oral
                            History Program Collection (L-0050)</title>
                        <author>Terry Sanford</author>
                    </titleStmt>
                    <extent>6 p.</extent>
                    <publicationStmt>
                        <publisher>Southern Historical Collection, University of North Carolina at
                            Chapel Hill</publisher>
                        <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace>
                        <date>18 December 1990</date>
                        <authority/>
                    </publicationStmt>
                    <notesStmt>
                        <note anchored="no">Interview conducted on December 18, 1990, by Cindy
                            Cheatham; recorded in Unknown.</note>
                        <note anchored="no"> Transcribed by Unknown.</note>
                        <note anchored="no"> Forms part of: Southern Oral History Program Collection
                            (#4007): Series L. University of North Carolina, Manuscripts Department,
                            University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</note>
                        <note anchored="no">Original transcript on deposit at the Southern
                            Historical Collection, The Wilson Library, University of North Carolina
                            at Chapel Hill.</note>
                    </notesStmt>
                </biblFull>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <projectDesc>
                <p>The electronic edition is a part of the UNC-Chapel Hill digital library, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South.</hi>
                </p>
            </projectDesc>
            <editorialDecl>
                <p>An audio file with the interview complements this electronic edition.</p>
                <p>The text has been entered using double-keying and verified against the original.</p>
                <p>The text has been encoded using the recommendations for Level 4 of the TEI in
                    Libraries Guidelines.</p>
                <p>Original grammar and spelling have been preserved. </p>
                <p>All quotation marks, em dashes and ampersand have been transcribed as entity
                    references.</p>
                <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as "</p>
                <p>All em dashes are encoded as —</p>
            </editorialDecl>
            <classDecl>
                <taxonomy id="lcsh">
                    <bibl>
                        <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings</title>
                    </bibl>
                </taxonomy>
                <taxonomy id="docsouth">
                    <bibl>
                        <title>Documenting the American South Topics</title>
                    </bibl>
                </taxonomy>
            </classDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
        <profileDesc>
            <langUsage>
                <language id="eng">English</language>
            </langUsage>
            <textClass>
                <keywords scheme="lcsh">
                    <list type="simple">
                        <item>
                            <!-- LC headings go here -->
                        </item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
                <keywords scheme="docsouth">
                    <list type="main_topic">
                        <item>North Carolina <list type="sub-topic">
                                <item>UNC Administration</item>
                            </list>
                        </item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
            </textClass>
        </profileDesc>
        <revisionDesc>
            <change>
                <date>2007-00-00, </date>
                <respStmt>
                    <name>Celine Noel, Wanda Gunther, and Kristin Martin</name>
                    <resp/>
                </respStmt>
                <item> revised TEIHeader and created catalog record for the electronic
                edition.</item>
            </change>
            <change>
                <date>2007-10-08, </date>
                <respStmt>
                    <name>Jennifer Joyner </name>
                    <resp/>
                </respStmt>
                <item>finished TEI-conformant encoding and final proofing.</item>
            </change>
        </revisionDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text id="ohs_L-0050">
        <front>
            <div1 type="about_interview">
                <head>Interview with Terry Sanford, December 18, 1990. Interview L-0050.</head>
                <byline>Conducted by Cindy Cheatham</byline>
                <note type="deposit" anchored="no">
                    <p>Transcript on deposit at The Southern Historical Collection, The Louis Round
                        Wilson Library</p>
                </note>
                <note type="citation" anchored="no">
                    <p>Citation of this interview should be as follows: <lb/>“Interview
                        L-0050, in the Southern Oral History Program Collection #4007, <lb/>Southern
                        Historical Collection, The Wilson Library, <lb/>University of North Carolina
                        at Chapel Hill”</p>
                </note>
                <note type="copyright" anchored="no">Copyright © 2007 The University of
                    North Carolina</note>
                <note type="transcription_note" anchored="no"/>
            </div1>
            <div1 type="abstract">
                <head>Abstract</head>
                <p>Terry Sanford begins this interview with a discussion of the student
                    demonstrations and protests that were sweeping Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
                    during his years as the Governor of North Carolina (1961-1965). The protests,
                    one of whose aims was to bring about open accommodations laws, were largely
                    fueled by student activism. Sanford describes how Anne Queen, director of the
                    YMCA/YWCA at the University of North Carolina, helped to calm demonstrating
                    students. Sanford uses this episode to segue into a broader discussion of
                    Queen's leadership at UNC during those tumultuous years, arguing that
                    she turned the YMCA/YWCA into the "social conscience" of the
                    University. He also describes his professional relationship with her during the
                    early 1960s. Likening Queen's leadership style to that of Frank
                    Porter Graham and William Friday, Sanford argues that universities (and
                    specifically the University of North Carolina) played an important and unique
                    role in the advance of social change during the mid-twentieth century. Sanford
                    also briefly discusses his own support for civil rights and his bid for the
                    governorship in 1961.</p>
            </div1>
            <div1 type="short_abstract">
                <head>Short Abstract</head>
                <p>Former Governor of North Carolina Terry Sanford lauds the leadership of Anne
                    Queen, director of the YMCA/YWCA at University of North Carolina. In addition,
                    Sanford discusses his advocacy of the civil rights movement and argues that the
                    University of North Carolina was a particularly powerful force for social change
                    during the mid-twentieth century. </p>
            </div1>
        </front>
        <body>
            <div1 id="L-0050" type="sohp_interview">
                <head>Interview with Terry Sanford, December 18, 1990. <lb/>Interview L-0050.
                    Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007)</head>
                <list type="simple">
                    <head>Interview Participants</head>
                    <item>
                        <name id="spk1" key="ts" reg="Sanford, Terry" type="interviewee">TERRY
                            SANFORD</name>, interviewee</item>
                    <item>
                        <name id="spk2" key="cc" reg="Cheatham, Cindy" type="interviewer">CINDY
                            CHEATHAM</name>, interviewer</item>
                </list>
                <div2 id="tape1-a" n="1-A" type="tape_side">
                    <pb id="p1" n="1"/>
                    <head>[TAPE 1, SIDE A]</head>
                    <note anchored="yes">
                        <p>[START OF TAPE 1, SIDE A]</p>
                    </note>
                    <milestone n="7138" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:00:00"/>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">TERRY SANFORD:</speaker>
                        <p> . . . came out from Capitol Hill. I knew him through Tom Lambeth and
                            Joel Fleishman and others in my office that had been at Chapel Hill and
                            had actually known Anne at Chapel Hill. Then I would have to begin with
                            the time that we had the Chapel Hill demonstrations. <milestone n="7138" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:00:33"/>
                    <milestone n="7048" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:00:34"/>Somewhat toward
                            the tail end of my administration we had created the Good Neighbor
                            Council, which was really a human relations council, but people
                            didn't know what human relations councils were. I stole that
                            Good Neighbor program really from Franklin Roosevelt who had named the
                            Latin American initiative of his administration the Good Neighbor
                            Program and that had sort of faded into history. I thought it was an apt
                            name for what we talking about and so we adopted that name. I think they
                            now call it the Human Relations Commission. It's enacted in
                            the law. We just did it with an executive order. And it began to talk
                            about jobs and education and doing away with the burdens of segregation
                            and made that a focal point. That followed the street demonstrations and
                            the sit-ins. The sit-ins, of course, preceded the street demonstrations.
                            It was part of our effort to let the black community know that we were
                            trying to help them achieve their aspirations. So that was in place.
                            Then a group of people in Chapel Hill demanded that the town of Chapel
                            Hill enact an open accommodations law. There was Lyndon
                            Johnson's open accommodations legislation that was being
                            debated in Congress and Sam Ervin and others here were against it, of
                            course. We were in a campaign in which Richardson Preyor was more or
                            less carrying our banner and Dan Moore and Sam Ervin were in opposition
                            to what we had been doing. In that kind of atmosphere, came this demand
                            that Chapel Hill's board enact an open accommodations law.
                            Now I doubt very seriously if they had the authority to do it, but in
                            any event, they very properly, I suppose, reacted to a demand that they
                            do something and they might have been inclined to do it. Certainly,
                            Chapel Hill was one of the most liberal places in the state. But out of
                            all of that came demonstrations in front of two or three places.
                            Grady's was a particular source. I think it's the
                            Grady's out there on the Pittsboro Road. I'm a
                            little bit vague about whether they had moved out there or whether they
                            were still on the Durham side, but they were continuing to demonstrate.
                            And by that time, we were sort of over the hump on that issue. This was
                            a resurgence of the demonstrations. They had declared, I think, CORE,
                            that they were really going to descend upon Chapel Hill and close it
                            down if the City Council didn't do this and I assured the
                            City Council and the people that nobody was going to take over running
                            North Carolina, that we were going to continue to run it. The first
                            time, I was a little bit more adversarial against that kind of movement
                            because I thought it was so totally unnecessary, disruptive and in fact,
                            I thought it was very damaging to Richardson Preyor's
                            campaign. You could be sure that the other crowd that Beverly Lake was
                            running ran third to Dan Moore. And they, of course, were against us
                            politically, so all of this came in the middle of a political campaign.
                            But that didn't say that we shouldn't try to do
                            something about it. Now Anne had become very good friends with Ralph
                            Scott who is now dead, but he was Governor Kerr Scott's
                            brother and probably an outstanding state senator of our time; just an
                            excellent public servant, very forward looking. In fact, in my memory,
                            years later they made him an honorary member of the Golden Fleece. I
                            could be wrong about that. But anyway, the Chapel Hill people took to
                            him even though he was a State graduate. And he and Anne and David
                            Coltrane, who was an old Conservative in a way. . . . He had been
                            director of the budget and he had a little bit of a feud with Kerr Scott
                            and Kerr Scott fired him for supporting Umstead instead of his county.
                            He was sort of a symbol of the <pb id="p2" n="2"/>Conservative wing, but
                            I made him the Director of Administration and then they retired him with
                            age. I knew he was a great Methodist labor, so I figured that I had just
                            the right man to be head of the Good Neighbor Council because he had all
                            the credentials from the conservative side and I thought I was touching
                            the Methodist vein there when I put him in. So, he did a great job. We
                            wanted to settle this thing over there. We wanted to get rid of it and
                            wanted to calm it down because we had not really had these things that
                            had gotten out of hand. We had handled the difficult ones a year
                            earlier. But this was particularly difficult. I know that Anne had the
                            confidence of all the people that were taking part in this. It
                            wasn't just black students; it was really mostly Chapel Hill
                            students that were doing the demonstrating. I know the CORE people were
                            certainly doing their part to keep it stirred up. I never really
                            completely understood that. But Anne more or less took charge of calming
                            that down. And I know she and Coltrane and Scott and others sat up all
                            night dealing and consulting and conferring. Finally, they arrested a
                            great many of them and sentenced all of them, including a professor of
                            religion at Duke. And I commuted all of those sentences, partially
                            I'm sure, with Anne Queen's urging, to zero. I
                            didn't pardon them because they had indeed committed the
                            crimes for which they were convicted. But I did commute the sentences so
                            they wouldn't go to jail. I just didn't want North
                            Carolina to send a professor of religion to jail and I didn't
                            think it was fair to send the students either. Some of them got to stay
                            in jail a little while. John Ely's book The Free Men tells
                            that story better than I can remember it. But anyhow, that's
                            the way I first got to know Anne Queen well. I probably knew her before
                            and her memory obviously, would be better than mine on that particular
                            point. I'm sure I had met her before. And after I left
                            office, I remember doing two or three things over at Chapel Hill. I had
                            a project going I called the State of American States. We would hold
                            conferences over there and we would completely bring together all the
                            help we needed for whatever it was we were doing. It became so obvious
                            to me then, the high regard the students had for her and the great
                            influence that she had. And really, the considerable part that the Y
                            played beyond what it played when I was there. I was a member of it when
                            I was there, but it wasn't a force on campus. Anne Queen made
                            it sort of the social conscience of the campus in a way that it had
                            never been before and probably isn't now without
                            Anne's presence. Maybe it is. Maybe she left enough of the
                            tradition that it is. But I always thought that Anne carried forward the
                            fundamental tradition of Chapel Hill that Frank Graham had established;
                            and before him, Edward Kidder Graham and other people going on back to,
                            I suppose, Cornelius Spencer. In any event, you know, there was a
                            special spirit about Chapel Hill that said the status quo is not good
                            enough. And that's always a risky social and political
                            posture to take because most people are comfortable with the status quo
                            unless they are bound down by it. And I think that better than anyone
                            else, Anne Queen picked up Frank Graham's spirit. But she
                            certainly wasn't there to be a part of what he had done for
                            North Carolina and for Chapel Hill. But those of us that were, I think
                            especially appreciated that here was somebody like her on campus. In a
                            way, she was an unlikely somebody, this young woman from the mountains
                            who was there in anything but a major administrative position and had
                            made her job, her organization, the Y, and her presence such an
                            important part of Chapel Hill. The University certainly needs an Anne
                            Queen. It makes a tremendous difference. And then of course, my
                            association with her in subsequent years was less dramatic. <milestone n="7048" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:12:32"/>
                            <milestone n="7139" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:12:33"/>I better
                            let you ask some questions. </p>
                    </sp>
                    <pb id="p3" n="3"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CINDY CHEATHAM:</speaker>
                        <p> What was your informal relationship with her? Did you speak to her on
                            the phone or did you speak to her through Tom Lambeth and Joel
                            Fleishman? </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">TERRY SANFORD:</speaker>
                        <p> Some of both. Some of all. And I think I had Martha McKay over there in
                            Chapel Hill then who was very active in my campaign and very insistent
                            that I put women on boards and commissions. We created the first
                            commission on the rights of women or whatever we called it at the time;
                            it's still in existence. So, Martha was there. Martha was not
                            the same kind of spirit exactly of Anne Queen, nor did she have the
                            connections at the University. In fact, I think I had Martha McKay on
                            the Good Neighbor Council and indeed, a couple of other people in Chapel
                            Hill. So, I had numerous ways to keep in touch with her. Of course, the
                            governor's is an extremely busy office and you
                            don't have time to sit around and casually direct an episode
                            of that kind. I remember making a rather rough statement and getting a
                            call from Tom. We didn't have car telephones then. We had the
                            State Highway Patrol radio which of course, was not secure, so we
                            didn't talk. I remember Tom stopping me when I was coming
                            back to do something at the Carolina Inn that had nothing to do with
                            this. I had been speaking in Southern Pines or somewhere down there. Tom
                            chided me for making a statement about Beverly Lake and the
                            demonstrators and the strikers that was a little too rough for his
                            judgment and he was right. But at that time Tom, of course, was dealing
                            with Anne and with Dave Coltrane. Tom was my administrative assistant.
                            Joel, of course, was my legal assistant and he knew Anne Queen very
                            well. We had plenty of ways to deal with them. And I think they probably
                            dealt with Anne more than I did under the circumstances. </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CINDY CHEATHAM:</speaker>
                        <p> Why do you believe, just from your knowledge through Tom and Joel and
                            your personal experiences with Anne, why do you believe she was perhaps
                            as effective as she was? What were her personal characteristics that
                            enabled that? </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">TERRY SANFORD:</speaker>
                        <p> Well, I think over the several years she had been at Chapel Hill, she
                            had earned their respect. They knew she was honest, that she would
                            listen to them, that she wasn't part of any avowal to keep
                            them down. The students, always probably, but certainly were beginning
                            to feel that they had more rights. I suppose you saw a good deal of that
                            coming along that we later saw more of during the Vietnam war where the
                            first uprisings in California, of course, were not so much against the
                            war as against Berkeley, against the University. And I think that
                            students felt that Anne could be trusted even though she was over thirty
                            at the time. </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CINDY CHEATHAM:</speaker>
                        <p> That's difficult to gain somebody's trust,
                            students' trust. I thought I read that Anne Queen was also on
                            a committee working with you for the Peace Corps. Do you recall that?
                        </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">TERRY SANFORD:</speaker>
                        <p> Well, I'm sure she was. We had a kind of an understanding
                            with the Peace Corps people that everybody that comes back from the
                            Peace Corps that comes to North Carolina, we'd give them a
                            job. We employed a whole nation of Peace Corps people. You know, we just
                            wanted to get those exciting young people into North Carolina.
                            I'm not quite sure what all the Peace Corps thing did, but we
                            wanted to support the whole concept of the Peace Corps and encourage
                            people to go. Then since I didn't see that any other state
                            saw in them what I did, we thought we'd just make an open
                            offer to everybody. And as I recall, too, we had her involved in our
                            foreign students commission or whatever we called it at the time. But
                            anyhow, whatever effort we were <pb id="p4" n="4"/>making for foreign
                            students as well as for the Peace Corps, as well as for the returning
                            Peace Corps, I think Anne had a part in all of those, in almost anything
                            that pertained to students. </p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7139" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:17:59"/>
                            <milestone n="7049" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:18:00"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CINDY CHEATHAM:</speaker>
                        <p> Can you comment on just the reaction to the statement that you made in
                            January of '63? It was the first time John Ely mentioned in
                            his book in history that a southern white governor had made an open
                            stand for the rights of Negroes or the rights of black people? How did
                            you receive criticism for that statement and what made you come out
                            openly for the rights of blacks? </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">TERRY SANFORD:</speaker>
                        <p> Well, I think we took that position to a certain degree during the
                            campaign which was a very difficult position to take because nobody had
                            ever in the South run a campaign against a racist attack by being
                            decent. And so how did you do that? I'd seen Frank Graham
                            lose his campaign in 1950 and I'd seen what the racial attack
                            almost did to Kerr Scott in '54. Then we ran against Beverly
                            Lake who was an all out segregationist. I think the most recent
                            statement to me the last time I saw him a year or two ago was that the
                            great tragedy of American history is that the South lost the Civil War.
                            So that's the man I was running against. </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CINDY CHEATHAM:</speaker>
                        <p> What was his name again? </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">TERRY SANFORD:</speaker>
                        <p> Beverly Lake. His son has now almost won a Supreme Court position. You
                            know, he's been testing the election over here right now in
                            Durham. So, we had beaten down a racist campaign which some people say
                            is the first time in a statewide race in the South post Civil War that
                            that was done. So, we had been very careful to be against segregation by
                            being for the Supreme Court decision. And unlike Virginia, with this
                            massive resistance, we were going to answer it with massive
                            intelligence. We had staked ourselves out. And furthermore, I think we
                            had staked ourselves out to history that I would have rather been right
                            on that issue than to have won. I certainly wouldn't have
                            wanted to win by compromising on that issue. I thought it was so
                            important in the sweep of history that North Carolina not pay like South
                            Carolina and Alabama and Mississippi and to a certain extent, Georgia.
                            So, there wasn't any question that we were going to take the
                            right position on it. The only question was how far can we push that
                            politically. And we pushed it pretty far. We pushed it far enough that
                            Richardson Preyor couldn't win and pushed it far enough when
                            I ran for President in '72, they got even with me. </p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7049" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:20:58"/>
                    <milestone n="7140" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:20:59"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CINDY CHEATHAM:</speaker>
                        <p> Can you comment a little bit on how North Carolina politics works and
                            the way that social change can come about? There's been a lot
                            of criticism that because, you know, still the area of the South is
                            fairly conservative, that social change is much slower. Can you comment
                            on that? I know that's a very broad question. </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">TERRY SANFORD:</speaker>
                        <p> Well, social change may or may not be slower and as we go along, I
                            suppose we get a better understanding of what social change is and
                            what's practical and what's maybe done just to
                            take the passions on the other side of the issue, depending on where you
                            are. So, I think that anywhere you take the country today,
                            you've got a President that takes every cheap shot he can and
                            cheap shots are easy to take. And it's leadership that will
                            not take the cheap shot that makes a difference. And so easy to take.
                            Right now there's idea that they are going to make quotas an
                            issue. Well, it's outrageous that he would do that. What was
                            it this morning Tom Wicker had comments on? But the point being, with
                            his flag running out there and making a statement about the <pb id="p5" n="5"/>Constitutional Amendment that would tear up the First
                            Amendment. Those kinds of cheap shots for political purposes are
                            tempting. I think we always tried to say in our administration that we
                            wanted to look good in history. So we want these decisions to stand up
                            and we don't want to make a quick decision for the moment.
                        </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CINDY CHEATHAM:</speaker>
                        <p> How did you see the role of religious leaders in the Civil Rights
                            movement around the state? </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">TERRY SANFORD:</speaker>
                        <p> Well, some of them were very bold and some of them were very conscious
                            of the attitudes of their congregations. You had someone like Maurice
                            Grant who was the editor of the "Biblical Reporter"
                            for the Baptists, which normally would be considered a fairly
                            conservative constituency. He certainly was one of the boldest, most
                            courageous writers in the South and given his constituency, especially
                            so. And you had a number of preachers around the state that boldly
                            asserted what they thought was the proper position, the long run
                            position. But by and large, it wasn't a movement of religion.
                            Organized religion is fairly conservative. </p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7140" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:24:38"/>
                    <milestone n="7050" unit="excerpt" type="start" timestamp="00:24:39"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CINDY CHEATHAM:</speaker>
                        <p> Do you have any kind of closing comments that you would like to make on
                            things in particular about Anne that you can recall, or about the Campus
                            Y that we haven't discussed and it's role just at
                            the University? </p>
                    </sp>
                    <sp who="spk1">
                        <speaker n="1">TERRY SANFORD:</speaker>
                        <p> Well, I think to go back to your question about social change that maybe
                            I use this example a number of times in explaining to people why in the
                            early sixties North Carolina seemed to be so far ahead of the rest of
                            the South; that I thought the difference was education and I said,
                            primarily, Chapel Hill, because at the turn of century, Chapel Hill was
                            where most of the leaders of the state came. To put it another way, most
                            of the leaders came from Chapel Hill or came to Chapel Hill. And I think
                            Chapel Hill had that concept of how to make the world better as being a
                            function of the University. I think they had it from the turn of the
                            century on. I think you can look at the history of the University. Now,
                            I could also tie in some efforts of other Universities. There were two
                            or three great people at Wake Forest. Certainly academic freedom in the
                            country got its greatest boost from Trinity College, which is now Duke.
                            But of all of these forces, Chapel Hill had to be the principal force,
                            because the most people who were taking up positions of leadership went
                            to Chapel Hill. And I think to have social change, you almost need a
                            continuity of spirit that comes from a University, not necessarily from
                            one person at a University, but from the University. And I think Chapel
                            Hill has played that role, sometimes played it badly but sometimes
                            played it extremely well. And over the sweep of history, extraordinarily
                            well. The highlight of that was Frank Graham. But you can go back prior
                            to Frank Graham or you could go back to Battle. You could go back to
                            Edward Kidder Graham who died of flu in World War I and then you had
                                <note type="comment"> [unclear] </note> and two or three other
                            people that were great educators. And then Frank Graham came in in about
                            1928 and was the great spokesman for social change in the South. He
                            thought things that you probably think wouldn't need a
                            champion; the sharecropper. There aren't many sharecroppers
                            left, but that was a great burden on society. He was a champion of labor
                            unions. You could get shot in North Carolina for being for a labor
                            union. And he was certainly the first very effective voice to do away
                            with segregation. So, a lot of your social change does come from the
                            University climate that goes out to the state through its graduates and
                            sustains them, I suppose, by being kind of a bedrock back there that is
                            a constant reference point as you are trying to find your way in your
                            own activities and your own community or in state government or
                            wherever. I think Anne was very much a <pb id="p6" n="6"/>part of that
                            bedrock. Now she didn't influence everybody that went to
                            Chapel Hill. Some of the people that went to Chapel Hill never were
                            influenced by any good motivations, of course. But by and large, the
                            spirit that made the difference that I've recited to people
                            from the turn of the century on was the kind of spirit that I think Anne
                            added to Chapel Hill. She came from a background, of course, that made
                            her particularly sensitive to injustices. You know her background was
                            one of poverty, of working in a mill, of deciding to go to college, of
                            finding that opportunity at Berea College. I was a Trustee of Berea
                            College. And then of going on to Divinity School and then coming here.
                            Well, she wasn't a part of Chapel Hill, but somehow she
                            refreshed that spirit in Chapel Hill at a time that I think that it
                            especially needed refreshing. Bill Friday had come there and Bill is a
                            fine administrator and of course, made a tremendous contribution to the
                            University, but Bill had the responsibilities of dealing with all the
                            establishments he had to deal with. Like I got Jake Felts, who actually
                            and incidentally is a product of Chapel Hill, to be my Anne Queen at
                            Duke. He's now head of the Student Union there. You need that
                            kind of person that gains the confidence of the students and assures
                            them that it's all right to be in favor of change and
                            improvement and higher ideas. And I think she played that part very well
                            at Chapel Hill. </p>
                    </sp>
                    <milestone n="7050" unit="excerpt" type="stop" timestamp="00:30:31"/>
                    <milestone n="7141" unit="empty" type="start" timestamp="00:30:32"/>
                    <sp who="spk2">
                        <speaker n="2">CINDY CHEATHAM:</speaker>
                        <p> You have been very helpful. I appreciate your words of wisdom today.
                            This is going to be good for my thesis.</p>
                    </sp>

                    <p>
                        <note anchored="yes">
                            <p>END OF INTERVIEW</p>
                        </note>
                    </p>
                    <milestone n="7141" unit="empty" type="stop" timestamp="00:30:41"/>
                </div2>
            </div1>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI.2>