Female athletes' lack of arrogance
Dorrance describes how women's mind-sets allows his UNC team to stay on top. Male athletes use their underdog status as a motivating factor, Dorrance believes, but female athletes lack that arrogance. This temperament allows his team to intimidate their opponents.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Anson Dorrance, June 11, 1991. Interview L-0054. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- MARY JO FESTLE:
-
But surely, everybody is gunning for you.
- ANSON DORRANCE:
-
There are definite challenges to staying on top. But also, I think it
gets back to another disparity between men and women in athletics. One
is men sort of enjoy the underdog role. It motivates them. And so, if a
men's team has been on top and they're playing
with another bunch of men that are underdogs or considered underdogs,
there's an incredible surge of adrenalin among those underdog
men to beat the guy on top. In the women's arena because, I
think, of differences between men and women, if your women's
team can come into the game with a certain sort of intimidating aura, it
doesn't motivate the opposition like it does for
men's teams. The men's teams, being the underdog
sort of pisses them off, you know. "I can't believe
it. Yeah, they're real good. Well, I played that guy in the
summer and I wrecked him up and I'm not afraid," and
they go on that sort of arrogant mentality which gives the
men's arena tremendous opportunity for upset because their
mentality is that way. They just can't
believe anyone's better than they are, so it's the
male ego refusing to accept that it's possible for anyone to
come in with a superior team. The women don't have that kind
of arrogance. And even though publicly they state that they have a lot
of confidence going to the game the next day against Carolina.
"Yeah, they can beat them," and all these sorts of
things. Even though they are saying all those things, way down deep,
they don't believe it. And I think the aura of our team gives
us an edge. And also in a men's game there is more ebb and
flow. In a men's game, even against a weaker team, the weaker
team will still dominate stretches of the game and the stronger team
will dominate for a while and the weaker team will come back. Or if the
teams are balanced, it's just constantly back and forth. In
the women's game, once a team gets on top, the confidence
level of the other team goes down, even my team. If another team takes a
shot and almost scores or the other team dominates for a while,
it's unbelievable how long it takes for my girls, you know,
nine time national champions, to get back on top of things. And so, if
we're that fragile, imagine how the other teams are that have
to play against this tradition and aura. And so I think in the
women's game, it's more important to establish
dominance because it will snowball. In the men's game,
there's a much better ebb and flow. Is any of this stuff
making sense?