At Bedingfield I was somewhat removed from the discipline. It was handled
basically all by the assistant principals. My only involvement in the
discipline came when an act of such severity required my involvement
such as long term suspended child, possession of a weapon, possession of
drugs or alcohol, something of that sort. And since we
didn't have a lot of that, I didn't have a lot
of immediate involvement in the disciplinary programming. In fact, we
established a high school, this is something the three high school
principals put in place my first year there, we went to the
Superintendent and said, (and he was all for it) we would like to have
county-wide high school disciplinary rules, conduct and consequences for
misbehavior. He said, great, put it together. The three of us spent
about two months the very first year that I was there and we came up
with this student code of conduct, disciplinary consequences for acts of
misbehavior. We implemented it and when I left it was one of the
smoother things that was working in the school system. What it did, it
specified what course of action would be taken for just about act of
misconduct that a student could commit. Yet, it didn't lock
you into it. It was a suggested course of action. How consistently you
Page 9 followed it was dependent upon of course those
implementing it and the disciplinary philosophy of the individual at the
school and it just so happens that we were all very consistent. We
followed it to the letter because if you are not going to follow the
rules, don't make them. So after we took the time to put
this together, we did implement it very consistently. Yet, we always a
little room for the exceptions that needed to be handled a little
differently. Don't paint yourself into a corner. But that
was working there. Now what I found here is the exact opposite.
There's only two high schools here, one 4-A, one 3_A. Not
only do we not have specified rules and regulations and we do not have
spelled out acts of misbehavior and the consequences for such, it is
discouraged and more or less what has been vocally expressed to me is
that each incident should be handled individually and personally. Okay,
except from the standpoint that is hard to define to a teenager.
Something that makes discipline effective, and research has proven this
too, the actual act of capital punishment is not what the taking of
another human beings life is not what makes capital punishment
effective, it is the fact that society is aware that it will be done.
That is where the deterrent comes in. That it exists and it will happen.
That is the deterrent--not the actual act of doing it. If that being the
case then it should be made public as it used to be. Therefore,
discipline to be effective has to be firm, it has to be fair, it has be
spelled out for the children so that they can understand and it has to
be implemented consistently. They have to know that all of them are
going to be treated alike and all of them are going to, "if I
do this, this is what is going to happen." Now if I make the
decision to do this, then I need to expect this consequence on the other
hand. And when you handle each and every case individually and you start
to weigh all of these factors in, you lose your objectivity. I am in a
difference of agreement right now--in fact that is something that is
going into our student recognition program that I am establishing
consistent school-wide rules. These are not classroom rules. My
philosophy on that is the teacher is in charge of that classroom. The
teacher establishes the rules for that class and it is my responsibility
to support that teacher when the child cannot follow those rules. If the
rules are unfair, then professionally and one-on-one I need to discuss
that with the teacher without a parent or a child but if the rules are
consistent with good discipline, if the rules are consistent with
expectations of the school, then it is my responsibility to support that
teacher when the child chooses not to follow those rules. Another
philosophy that I have about this is that in administering discipline to
a child you need to be empathetic, need to listen to the child and hear
him out and try to find the cause of the problem, secondly you need to
have clearly defined rules and regulations and what will be the
consequences for the misbehavior, and thirdly, what I call you need to
let bygones be bygones. The
Page 10 children when they
have problems with one another, the teaches and children when they have
personality conflicts or run-in, the administration and the child, it
happened, this is your punishment, learn a lesson from it and I
don't want to hear anymore about it. That needs to be the
end of it. The teacher shouldn't drag it back out of the
closet, the kid shouldn't drag it back out of the closet and
the principal shouldn't use it as weapon to beat the poor
kid over the head with it all year long, that he/she did such and such
and I've labeled you and I'm going to keep you
down. That happens and you've got to let bygones be bygones,
learn your lesson from it, accept the punishment, move on, get over,
don't do it again but let's move on to something
else. Discipline is not punishment. Punishment should not hurt, it
should correct misbehavior or change undesirable behavior. That is the
purpose of discipline. And if the children know your philosophy, still
even in 1990, or almost 1991, with what our teenagers have gone through,
children will respond to what you expect of them and what you inspect
that they're doing. They will respond to it.