No, not in those original, early days. That made us, so far as the
benefits were concerned—there were many minority physicians
treating that part of the population that was under Medicare. [They]
were able to get some compensation for people [for whom] we'd
previously not been able to. Now that was important to us. But as far as
making the fine lines and rules and regulations that they went by in
applying the law, we still were at a loss. On the presidential level,
President Bush appointed Dr. Sullivan from Morehouse in Atlanta in his
cabinet as the Health and Human Services secretary. The present
president, Clinton, has done what I conceive to be a very fair and
equitable job in appointing people to positions, especially in the area
of human services. It's unfortunate that Dr. Jocelyn Elders
got asked to resign because of a statement that she made, which to me
was very unfortunate and ill-timed. When President Clinton nominated Dr.
Henry Foster, who was a good friend of mine at Meharry, and
I've known him for years and years, Dr. Foster got caught up
in that political meatgrinder, where the publicans were against the
sinners. He didn't get confirmed, not because of the
man's stature or abilities, but because he got caught in that
political meatgrinder. Which was unfortunate for the whole country, as
far as his being able to do something is concerned. The National Medical
Association has been in the forefront of medical progress and a system
of health care delivery where the uninsured and underinsured patient is
taken care of, too. We've been right on the cutting edge of
that philosophical stance. Whereas the American Medical Association has
been laid back, and against it. When I was active in the North Carolina
Medical Society—I'm still a member, but
I'm an emeritus life member, so I don't get
involved in some of the day to day things like I did when I was
active—they've always raised the specter of
"we don't want socialized medicine." Well,
when you ask somebody, "Give me the details of what socialized
medicine is, and what it means, and how it's going to
work," they're not able to tell you what it is. Here
again, when the North Carolina Medical Society was one of the groups
that was arrayed against the establishment of a medical school here in
Greenville, only two professional groups in medicine supported that
concept, and that was the Old North State, and the North Carolina
Academy of Physicians. Chapel Hill, the North Carolina Medical Society,
Duke, Bowman-Gray were all against it to the point that when the Board
of Governors, and I was there as a member of the sub-committee on
Medical Education—I was thick in the fight of all of this
stuff. After the sub-committee got split down the middle, and the
chairman didn't want, I'm sure, to break the tie,
they engineered a [solution]. They said, "Let's
employ a group of distinguished medical educators, and let them help
decide." So we created that group at [UNC system President]
Friday's insistence, and brought five medical educators in,
who went about the state for
Page 20four or five months.
They made a report back to the Board of Governors, and the essence of
that report was that North Carolina did not need another degree-granting
medical school at this time and this place. I made my little
contribution by speaking against the approval of this report, because [I
said], "It is not going to silence the cry from Pigfoot
Junction and Calico and Chitlin Switch and Beargrass, those people out
there who have been deprived of medical care. They're not
going to be quieted by the fact that we don't do something
about it. It would be foolhardy for us to think that adoption of this
recommendation would forever put the question to rest. It was some two
thousand years ago that Christ died. He hung on the cross, he was
buried, but he rose again. In like manner, this question's
going to keep rising and rising until something is done about it. If we
adopt this report, the only thing that we will do is to take the ball
from the academic arena, where it should be in my judgment, and toss it
over to the political arena, where it doesn't necessarily
belong. But within our time, let me turn prophet a moment, there will be
another degree-granting medical school in the state of North Carolina.
The politicians are going to do what we are reluctant to do."
And I sat down. It turned out that I was a prophet. What happened, based
on the fact that there were 32 members of the Board, 18 voted to approve
this recommendation of the five distinguished medical educators. There
were 14 of us against. Here again, the minority presence was felt,
because there were seven minority members on that 32-member board, and
all seven of the minority members stood firm against the adoption of
this report saying that there was no need. Seven majority members joined
us seven minority members, and that made the final count 18 to adopt, 14
were opposed. The closeness of that vote gave some impetus to getting
some legislation introduced to the General Assembly. Carl Stewart from
the House and Senator Scott introduced the bill to create the medical
school. So the Stewart-Scott Bill was debated. It was referred to the
reference committee of five people, and it was up to the reference
committee to report it out so it could be considered. If that committee
doesn't report that legislation out of committee,
it's dead. The reference committee split down the middle, two
and two. You know who broke that tie? The then-Representative Henry E.
Frye from Greensboro. Representative Frye is now Justice Henry Frye,
he's the only minority member of the state Supreme Court. He
broke the tie, and let this legislation come out of committee. Both
sides were really lobbying Henry, who raised the question of
"what are we going to do about minority education?"
The pros said, "OK, Henry. If there's something you
want in the legislation, go ahead, and we'll accept whatever
you say." So Henry scribbled on there that he wanted a mandate
for the recruitment and retention of minorities. So far as I know, it is
the only medical school in the country with that particular mandate for
the recruitment and retention of minorities. Here again, I'm
trying to paint a picture to show you where the minority attitude of
looking out for the unlooked-out-for is prevailing. All through this is
a very clear pattern where, in many other instances, the majority
attitude is, "If you can survive, OK, but if you're
not in the
Page 21survival group, the heck with
you." Our attitude has always been supportive of the underdog,
and that's an important thing to me.