<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite.dtd" [
<!ENTITY % external-entities SYSTEM "./extEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY % internal-entities SYSTEM "./intEntities.dtf">
<!ENTITY wirtfp SYSTEM "wirtfp.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY wirtsp SYSTEM "wirtsp.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
<!ENTITY wirttp SYSTEM "wirttp.jpg" NDATA jpeg>
]>
<TEI.2>
  <teiHeader type="text" status="new">
    <fileDesc>
      <titleStmt>
        <title>Sketches of the Life and Character of Patrick Henry:
Electronic Edition</title>
        <author>Wirt, William, 1772-1834</author>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text scanned (OCR) by</resp>
          <name id="cg">Melanie Polutta</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Images scanned by</resp>
          <name>Melanie Polutta</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt>
          <resp>Text encoded by </resp>
          <name id="ns">Carlene Hempel and Jill Kuhn</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <editionStmt>
        <edition>First edition, <date>1999</date></edition>
      </editionStmt>
      <extent>ca. 892K</extent>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>University Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</publisher>
        <pubPlace>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, </pubPlace>
        <date>1999.</date>
        <availability status="unknown">
          <p>This work is the property of the University of North Carolina 
at Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching and personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the text.</p>
        </availability>
      </publicationStmt>
      <notesStmt>
        <note anchored="yes">Call number E302.6 .H5 W69 c.2
(Rare Book Collection, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)</note>
      </notesStmt>
      <sourceDesc>
        <bibl>
          <title>Sketches of the Life and Character of Patrick Henry</title>
          <author>Wirt, William</author>
          <imprint>
            <pubPlace>Philadelphia</pubPlace>
            <publisher>Published by James Webster</publisher>
            <date>1817</date>
          </imprint>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <projectDesc>
        <p>        This electronic edition is a part of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill digital library, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South.</hi></p>
      </projectDesc>
      <editorialDecl>
        <p>Any hyphens occurring in line breaks have been removed, and the trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding line.</p>
        <p>All quotation marks and ampersand have been transcribed as
entity references.</p>
        <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as ” and “
respectively.</p>
        <p>All single right and left quotation marks are encoded as ’ and ‘ respectively.</p>
        <p>Indentation in lines has not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Running titles have not been preserved.</p>
        <p>Spell-check and verification made against printed text using Author/Editor (SoftQuad) and Microsoft Word spell check programs.</p>
      </editorialDecl>
      <classDecl>
        <taxonomy id="lcsh">
          <bibl>
            <title>Library of Congress Subject Headings </title>
          </bibl>
        </taxonomy>
      </classDecl>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc>
      <langUsage>
        <language id="lat">Latin</language>
        <language id="fre">French</language>
      </langUsage>
      <textClass>
        <keywords scheme="lcsh">
          <list type="simple">
            <item>Henry, Patrick, 1736-1799.</item>
            <item>Statesmen -- United States -- Biography.</item>
            <item>Virginia -- Biography.</item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change>
        <date>1999-05-06, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Celine Noel and Wanda Gunther </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item> revised TEIHeader and created catalog 
record for the electronic edition.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1999-03-15, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Jill Kuhn, </name>
          <resp>project manager, </resp>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished TEI-conformant encoding and final proofing.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1998-07-13, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Carlene Hempel, </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished TEI/SGML encoding.</item>
      </change>
      <change>
        <date>1998-06-17, </date>
        <respStmt>
          <name>Melanie Polutta, </name>
          <resp/>
        </respStmt>
        <item>finished scanning (OCR) and proofing.</item>
      </change>
    </revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text>
    <front>
      <div1 type="spine image">
        <p>
          <figure id="spine" entity="wirtsp">
            <p>[Spine Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="frontispiece image">
        <p>
          <figure id="frontis" entity="wirtfp">
            <p>PUBLISHED BY J. WEBSTER.<lb/>PATRICK HENRY.<lb/>[Frontispiece Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <div1 type="title page image">
        <p>
          <figure id="title" entity="wirttp">
            <p>[Title Page Image]</p>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div1>
      <titlePage>
        <docTitle>
          <titlePart type="main">SKETCHES
<lb/>
OF THE
<lb/>
LIFE AND CHARACTER
<lb/>
OF
<lb/>
PATRICK HENRY.</titlePart>
        </docTitle>
        <byline>BY</byline>
        <docAuthor>WILLIAM WIRT,</docAuthor>
        <docImprint>OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA.</docImprint>
        <epigraph>
          <p>
            <foreign lang="lat">“In quo hoc maximum est, quod neque ante illum, quem ille imitaretur,
neque post illum, qui eum imitari posset, inventus est.”
PATERC. lib i. cap v.</foreign>
          </p>
        </epigraph>
        <docImprint><pubPlace>PHILADELPHIA:</pubPlace>
<publisher>PUBLISHED BY JAMES WEBSTER, No. 10, S. EIGHTH STREET.
<lb/>
William Brown, Printer, Prune-street.</publisher>
<docDate>1817.</docDate></docImprint>
      </titlePage>
      <pb id="wirtii" n="ii"/>
      <div1 type="dedication letter">
        <opener>
          <salute>
            <hi rend="italics">District of Pennsylvania, to wit:</hi>
          </salute>
        </opener>
        <p>BE IT REMEMBERED, That, on the eleventh day of October, in the forty-second
year of the Independence of the United States of America, A. D. 1817,
James Webster, of the said District, hath deposited in this office the title of a
book, the right whereof he claims as proprietor, in the words following, to wit:</p>
        <q type="quotation" direct="unspecified">
          <p>“Sketches of the Life and Character of Patrick Henry. By William Wirt, of<lb/>
“Richmond, Virginia.  <foreign lang="lat">In quo hoc maximum est, quod neque ante illum,
<lb/>“quem ille imitaretur, neque post illum, qui eum imitari posset, inventus
<lb/>“est. Paterc. lib. i. cap. v.”</foreign></p>
        </q>
        <p>In conformity to the act of the Congress of the United States, entitled “An
act for the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies of maps, charts,
and books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times
therein mentioned.”—And also to the act, entitled “An act supplementary to
an act, entitled ‘An act for the encouragement of learning by securing the copies
of maps, charts, and books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies,
during the times therein mentioned,’ and extending the benefits thereof to the
arts of designing, engraving, and etching historical and other prints.”</p>
        <closer>
          <signed>D. CALDWELL,<lb/>
Clerk of the district of Pennsylvania.</signed>
        </closer>
      </div1>
      <pb id="wirtiii" n="iii"/>
      <div1 type="dedication">
        <lg type="dedication">
          <l>TO</l>
          <lb/>
          <l>THE YOUNG MEN OF VIRGINIA,</l>
          <lb/>
          <l>THIS WORK</l>
          <lb/>
          <l>IS RESPECTFULLY INSCRIBED,</l>
          <lb/>
          <l>BY</l>
          <lb/>
          <l>THE AUTHOR.</l>
        </lg>
      </div1>
      <pb id="wirtv" n="v"/>
      <div1 type="preface">
        <head>PREFACE.</head>
        <p>The reader has a right to know what degree of
credit is due to the following narrative; and it is the
object of this preface to give him that satisfaction.</p>
        <p>It was in the summer of 1805 that the design of writing
this biography was first conceived. It was produced by
an incident of feeling, which however it affected the author
at the time, might now, be thought light and trivial
by the reader, and he shall not therefore, be detained
by the recital of it. The author knew nothing
of Mr. Henry, personally. He had never seen him;
and was of course, compelled to rely wholly on the
information of others. As soon, therefore, as the design
was formed of writing his life, aware of the necessity of
losing no time, in collecting, from the few remaining coevals
of Mr. Henry, that personal knowledge of the
subject which might erelong be expected to die with
them, the author despatched letters to every quarter of
the state in which it occurred to him as probable, that
interesting matter might be found; and he was gratified
by the prompt attention which was paid to his inquiries.</p>
        <pb id="wirtvi" n="vi"/>
        <p>There were at that time, living in the county of Hanover,
three gentlemen of the first respectability, who
had been the companions of Mr. Henry's childhood and
youth: these were, col. Charles Dabney, capt. George
Dabney, and col. William O. Winston; the two first of
whom are still living. Not having the pleasure of a
personal acquaintance with these gentlemen, the author
interested the late Mr. Nathaniel Pope in his object,
and by his instrumentality, procured all the useful
information which was in their possession. Mr. Pope is
well known to have been a gentleman of uncommonly
vigorous and discriminating mind; a sacred observer of
truth, and a man of the purest sense of honour. The
author cannot <sic corr="recall">recal</sic> the memory of this most amiable
and excellent man, to whom (if there be any merit in
this work) the friends of Mr. Henry and the state of Virginia
owe so many obligations, without paying to that
revered memory, the tribute of his respect and affection.
Mr. Pope was one of those ardent young Virginians,
who embarked, before they had attained their maturity, in
the cause of the American revolution: he joined an animated
and active corps of horse, and signalized himself
by an impetuous gallantry, which drew upon him the
eyes and the applause of his commander. In peace, he
was as mild as he had been brave in war; his bosom
<pb id="wirtvii" n="vii"/>
was replete with the kindest affections; he was in
truth, one of the best of companions, and one of the
warmest of friends. The fact, that he was the acknowledged
head of the several bars at which he practised
in the country, may assure the reader of his capacity
for the commission which he so cheerfully undertook, in
regard to Mr. Henry; and the unblemished integrity of
his life may assure him also, of the fidelity with which
that commission was executed. So many important
anecdotes in the following work, depend on the credit
of this gentleman as a witness, that the slight sketch
which has been given of his character will not, it is
hoped, be thought foreign to the purpose of this preface.
Mr. Pope did not confine his inquiries to the
county of Hanover: he was indefatigable in collecting
information from every quarter; which he never accepted
however, but from the purest sources; and his
authority for every incident was given, with the most
scrupulous accuracy. The author had hoped to have
had it in his power to gratify this gentleman by submitting
to his view the joint result of their labours, and
obtaining the benefit of his last corrections; but he was
disappointed by his untimely and melancholy death.
He fell a victim to that savage practice, which under
the false name of honour, continued to prevail too long;
<pb id="wirtviii" n="viii"/>
and his death is believed to have been highly instrumental
in hastening that system of legislation in
restraint of this practice, which now exists in Virginia.</p>
        <p>Besides the contributions furnished by Mr. Pope, the
writer derived material aid from various other quarters.
The widow of Mr. Henry was still living, and had
intermarried with judge Winston: from this gentleman,
(who was also related to Mr. Henry by blood, and had
been intimately acquainted with him through the far
greater part of his life) the author received a succinct,
but extremely accurate and comprehensive memoir.</p>
        <p>Col. Meredith of Amherst, was a few years older
than Mr. Henry, had been raised in the same neighbourhood,
and had finally married one of his sisters.
Having known Mr. Henry, from his birth to his death,
he had it in his power to supply very copious details,
which were taken down from his narration by the present
judge Cabell, and forwarded to the author.</p>
        <p>One of the most intimate and confidential friends of
Mr. Henry, was the late judge Tyler. The judge had
a kind of Roman frankness and even bluntness in his
manners, together with a decision of character and a
benevolence of spirit, which had attached Mr. Henry to
him, from his first appearance on the public stage.
They were, for a long time, members of the house of
<pb id="wirtix" n="ix"/>
delegates together, and their friendship continued until
it was severed by death. From judge Tyler, the author
received a very minute and interesting communication
of incidents, the whole of which had either passed
in his own presence, or had been related to him by Mr.
Henry himself.</p>
        <p>The writer is indebted to judge Tucker for two or
three of his best incidents; one of them will probably,
be pronounced the most interesting passage of the work.
He owes to the same gentleman too, the fullest and liveliest
description of the person of Mr. Henry, which has
been furnished from any quarter: and he stands farther
indebted to him for a rare and (to the purpose of this
work) a very important book; the journals of the house
of burgesses for the years 1763-4-5-6 and 7.</p>
        <p>From judge Roane, the author has received one of the
fairest and most satisfactory communications that has
been made to him; and the vigour and elegance with
which that gentleman writes, has frequently enabled
the author, to relieve the dulness of his own narrative,
by extracts from his statements.</p>
        <p>Mr. Jefferson too, has exercised his well known
kindness and candour on this occasion; having not only
favoured the author with a very full communication in
the first instance; but assisted him, subsequently and
<pb id="wirtx" n="x"/>
repeatedly, with his able counsel, in reconciling apparent
contradictions, and clearing away difficulties of fact.</p>
        <p>Besides these statements, drawn from the memory of
his correspondents, the writer was favoured by the late
Governor Page, with the reading of a pretty extended
sketch which he had, himself, prepared of the life of
Mr. Henry; and he has, furthermore, availed himself
of the kind permission of Mr. Peyton Randolph, to
examine an extremely valuable manuscript history of
Virginia, written by his father, the late Mr. Edmund
Randolph; which embraces the whole period of Mr.
Henry's public life.</p>
        <p>In addition to these stores of information, the author
has had the good fortune to procure complete files of the
public newspapers, reaching from the year 1763 down
to the close of the American revolution; by these, he
has been enabled to correct, in some important instances,
the memory of his correspondents, in relation not only
to dates, but to facts themselves.</p>
        <p>He has been fortunate too, in having procured several
original letters which shed much light on important
and hitherto disputed facts, in the life of Mr. Henry.</p>
        <p>The records of the general court, and the archives of
the state having been convenient to the author, and always
open to him, he has endeavoured assiduously
<pb id="wirtxi" n="xi"/>
and carefully, to avail himself of that certain and permanent
evidence which they afford; and has been enabled,
by this means, as the reader will discover, to correct
some strange mistakes in historical facts.</p>
        <p>The author's correspondents will find, that he has departed
in some instances, from their respective statements,
and he owes them an explanation for having
done so: the explanation is this; their statements were,
in several instances, diametrically opposed to each
other; and were sometimes, all contradicted by the
public prints, or the records of the state. It ought not
to be matter of surprise that these contradictions should
exist, even among those most respectable gentlemen,
relying as they did, upon human memory merely; and
speaking of events so very remote, without a previous
opportunity of communicating with each other. It
will be seen by them, that the author has been obliged
in several instances, to contradict even the several
histories of the times, concerning which he writes: but this
he has never done, without the most decisive proofs of
his own correctness, which he has always cited: nor has
he ever departed from the narratives of his several
correspondents, except under the direction of preponderating
evidence. As among those contradictory statements,
<hi rend="italics">all</hi> could not be true, he has sought the correction by
<pb id="wirtxii" n="xii"/>
public documents when such correction was attainable;
and when it was not, he has selected among his narrators,
those, whose opportunities to know the fact in
question, seemed to be the best. This he has done,
without the slightest intention to throw a shadow of
suspicion on the credit of any gentleman, who has been so
obliging as to answer his inquiries; but merely from the
necessity which he was under, either of making <hi rend="italics">some
selection</hi>, or abandoning the work altogether; and
because he knew of no better rule of selection, than that
which he has adopted.</p>
        <p>Although it has been so long since the collection of
these materials was begun, it was not until the summer
of 1814 that the last communication was received. Even
then, when the author sat down to the task of embodying
his materials, there were so many intricacies to
disentangle, and so many inconsistencies, from time to time,
to explain and settle, and that too, through the tedious
agency of cross-mails, that his progress was continually
impeded, and has been, to him, most painfully, retarded.</p>
        <p>Other causes too, have contributed to delay the publication.
The author is a practising lawyer; and the
courts which he attends, keep him perpetually and
exclusively occupied, in that attendance, through ten
months of the year: nor does the summer recess, of
<pb id="wirtxiii" n="xiii"/>
two months, afford a remission from professional labour.
In Virginia, the duties of attorney, counsellor,
conveyancer, and advocate, are all performed by the
same individual; hence the summer vacation, instead of
being a time of leisure, is not only the season of preparation
for the approaching courts, but is subject moreover,
to a perpetual recurrence of what are here called
<hi rend="italics">office</hi> duties, which renders a steady application to any
other subject impossible.</p>
        <p>These sketches, are now submitted to the public,
with unaffected diffidence; not of the facts which they
detail, for on them, the author has the firmest reliance;
but of the manner in which he has been able to accomplish
his undertaking. For (to say nothing of his inexperience
and want of ability for such a work) he has
been compelled to write (when he was suffered to write
at all) amidst that incessant professional annoyance
which has been mentioned, and which is known by
every man, who has ever made the trial, to forbid the
hope of success in any composition of this extent. Could
the writer have looked forward, with any reasonable
calculation, to a period of greater ease, his respect for
the memory of Mr. Henry, as well as his regard for
himself would have induced him to suspend this undertaking,
until that period should have arrived. But having
<pb id="wirtxiv" n="xiv"/>
no ground for any hope of this kind, he has thought
it better to hazard even these crude sketches, than to
suffer the materials which he had accumulated with so
much toil, and for all object which he thought so laudable,
to perish on his hands.</p>
        <p>These remarks are not made with the view of deprecating
the censures of critics by profession: but merely
to bespeak the candour of that larger portion of readers
who are willing to be pleased with the best efforts that
can be reasonably expected, from the circumstances of
the case. The author however, is well satisfied, that
the most indulgent reader (although benevolently
disposed to overlook defects of execution) will be certainly
disappointed <hi rend="italics">in the matter itself</hi>, of this work; for
notwithstanding all his exertions, he is entirely conscious
that the materials which he has been able to collect are
scanty and meagre, and utterly disproportionate to the
great fame of Mr. Henry. It is probable, that much of
what was once known of him, had perished before the
author commenced his researches; and it is very possible
that much may still be known, which he has not been
able to discover; because it lies in unsuspected sources,
or with persons unwilling for some reason or other to
communicate their information. It is the conviction that
he has not been able to inform himself of the whole
<pb id="wirtxv" n="xv"/>
events of Mr. Henry's life, and that his collection can
be considered only as so many detached SKETCHES,
which has induced him to prefix this name to his book.
If, in this humble and unassuming character, it shall give
any pleasure to the numerous admirers of Mr. Henry,
in Virginia, the author will have attained all that he has
a right to expect.</p>
        <closer>
          <dateline>RICHMOND, Virginia,
<lb/>
Sept. 5th, 1817.</dateline>
        </closer>
      </div1>
    </front>
    <pb id="wirt1" n="1"/>
    <body>
      <div1>
        <head>SKETCHES
<lb/>
OF THE
<lb/>
LIFE OF PATRICK HENRY.</head>
        <div2 type="chapter">
          <head>SECTION I.</head>
          <p>PATRICK HENRY, the second son of John and
Sarah Henry, and one of nine children, was born on the
29th of May 1736, at the family seat, called Studley, in
the county of Hanover and colony of Virginia. In his
early childhood, his parents removed to another seat in
the same county, then called Mount Brilliant, now the
Retreat; at which latter place, Patrick Henry was raised
and educated. His parents, though not rich, were in
easy circumstances; and, in point of personal character,
were among the most respectable inhabitants of the colony.</p>
          <p>His father, col. John Henry, was a native of Aberdeen,
in Scotland. He was, it is said, a first cousin to David
Henry, who was the brother-in-law and successor of
Edward Cave, in the publication of that celebrated work,
The Gentleman's Magazine, and, himself, the author of
several literary tracts: John Henry, is, also said to have
been a nephew, in the maternal line, to the great historian
Dr. William Robertson. He came over to Virginia,
in quest of fortune, some time prior to the year 1730, and
<pb id="wirt2" n="2"/>
the tradition is, that he enjoyed the friendship and patronage
of Mr. Dinwiddie, afterwards the governor of the
colony. By this gentleman, it is reported, that he was
introduced to the elder col. Syme of Hanover, in whose
family, it is certain, that he became domesticated during
the life of that gentleman, after whose death, he
intermarried with his widow, and resided on the estate
which he had left. It is considered as a fair proof of the
personal merit of Mr. John Henry, that, in those days,
when offices were bestowed with peculiar caution, he
was the colonel of his regiment, the principal surveyor of
the county, and for many years, the presiding magistrate
of the county court. His surviving acquaintances concur
in stating, that he was a man of liberal education,
that he possessed a plain, yet solid understanding; and lived
long a life of the most irreproachable integrity, and
exemplary piety. His brother Patrick, a clergyman of the
church of Engand, followed him to this country some
years afterwards; and became, by <hi rend="italics">his</hi> influence, the minister
of St. Paul's parish in Hanover, the functions of which
office he sustained throughout life with great respectability.
Both the brothers were zealous members of the
established church, and warmly attached to the reigning
family. Col. John Henry was conspicuously so: “there
are those yet alive,” says a correspondent,<ref targOrder="U" id="ref1" n="1" rend="sc" target="note1"> *</ref> “who have
seen him, at the head of his regiment, celebrating the
birth day of George the III. with as much enthusiasm,
as his son Patrick, afterwards, displayed, in resisting the
encroachment of that monarch.” <ref targOrder="U" id="ref2" n="2" rend="sc" target="note2">†</ref></p>
          <p>Mrs. Henry, the widow of col. Syme, as we have seen,
 <note id="note1" n="1" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref1"><p> * Mr. Pope, in 1805.</p></note>
<note id="note2" n="2" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref2"><p>† Mr. Burk's account of Mr. Henry is extremely careless and full of
errors. He begins by making him the son of his uncle: <hi rend="italics">“Patrick Henry</hi>, the
son of a Scotch gentleman of <hi rend="italics">the same name</hi>, &amp;c.” 3d vol. of the History of
Virginia, page 300.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt3" n="3"/>
and the mother of Patrick Henry, was a native of Hanover
County, and of the family of Winstons. She possessed,
in an eminent degree, the mild and benevolent
disposition, the undeviating probity, the correct
understanding and easy elocution by which that ancient family
has been so long distinguished. Her brother William,
the father of the present judge Winston, is said to have
been highly endowed with that peculiar cast of eloquence,
for which Mr. Henry became, afterwards, so
justly celebrated. Of this gentleman I have an anecdote
from a correspondent,<ref targOrder="U" id="ref3" n="3" rend="sc" target="note3"> *</ref> which I shall give in his
own words. “I have often heard my father, who was
intimately acquainted with this William Winston, say,
that he was the greatest orator whom he ever heard,
Patrick Henry excepted; that during the last French and
Indian war, and soon after Braddock's defeat, when the
militia were marched to the frontiers of Virginia, against
the enemy, this William Winston was the lieutenant of a
company; that the men, who were indifferently clothed,
without tents, and exposed to the rigour and inclemency of
the weather, discovered great aversion to the service, and
were anxious and even clamorous to return to their families;
when this William Winston, mounting a stump, (the
common <hi rend="italics">rostrum</hi>, you know, of the field orator of Virginia,)
addressed them with such keenness of invective, and
declaimed with such force of eloquence, on liberty and
patriotism, that when he concluded, the general cry was,
‘let us march on; lead us against the enemy;’ and they
were now willing, nay anxious to encounter all those
difficulties and dangers, which, but a few moments before,
had almost produced a mutiny.”</p>
          <p>Thus much I have been able to collect of the parentage
 <note id="note3" n="3" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref3"><p> * Mr. Pope.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt4" n="4"/>
and family of Mr. Henry; and this, I presume, will
be thought quite sufficient, in relation to a man, who
owed no part of his greatness to the lustre of his pedigree,
but was, in truth, the sole founder of his own fortunes.</p>
          <p>Until ten years of age, Patrick Henry was sent to
a school in the neighbourhood, where he learned to
read and write, and made some small prowess in arithmetic.
He was, then, taken home, and under the
direction of his father; who had opened a grammar
school in his own house, he acquired a superficial
knowledge of the Latin language; and learned to read
the character, but never to translate Greek. At the
same time, he made a considerable proficiency in the
mathematics, the only branch of education for which,
it seems, he discovered, in his youth, the slightest
predilection. But he was too idle to gain any solid advantage
from the opportunities which were thrown in his
way. He was passionately addicted to the sports of the
field, and could not support the confinement and toil
which education required. Hence, instead of system
or any semblance of regularity in his studies, his efforts
were always desultory, and became more and more
rare; until, at length, when the hour of his school
exercises arrived, Patrick was scarcely ever to be found.
He was in the forest with his gun, or over the brook
with his angle-rod; and, in these frivolous occupations,
when not controuled by the authority of his father,
(which was rarely exerted,) he would, it is said, spend
whole days and weeks, with an appetite rather whetted
than cloyed by enjoyment. His school fellows, having
observed his growing passion for those amusements, and
having remarked that its progress was not checked
either by the want of companions or the want of
<pb id="wirt5" n="5"/>
success, have frequently watched his movements to discover,
if they could, the secret source of that delight which
they seemed to afford him. But they made no discovery
which led them to any other conclusion than (to
use their own expression) “that he loved idleness for
its own sake.” They have frequently observed him
laying along, under the shade of some tree that overhung
the sequestered stream, watching, for hours, at
the same spot, the motionless cork of his fishing line,
without one encouraging symptom of success, and without
any apparent source of enjoyment, unless he could
find it in the ease of his posture, or in the illusions of
hope, or, which is most probable, in the stillness of the
scene and the silent workings of his own imagination.
This love of solitude, in his youth, was often observed.
Even when hunting with a party, his choice was not to join
the noisy band that drove the deer; he preferred to
take his stand, alone, where he might wait for the passing
game, and indulge himself, meanwhile, in the luxury
of thinking. Not that he was averse to society; on the
contrary, he had, at times, a very high zest for it. But
even in society, his enjoyments while young, were of a
peculiar cast; he did not mix in the wild mirth of his
equals in age; but sat, quiet and demure, taking no part
in the conversation, giving no responsive smile to the
circulating jest, but lost, to all appearance, in silence
and abstraction. This abstraction, however, was only
apparent; for on the dispersion of a company, when
interrogated by his parents as to what had been passing,
he was able not only to detail the conversation, but to
sketch, with strict fidelity, the character of every
speaker. None of these early delineations of character
are retained by his <sic corr="contemporaries">cotemporaries</sic>; and, indeed,
they are said to have been more remarkable for their
justness, than for any peculiar felicity of execution.</p>
          <pb id="wirt6" n="6"/>
          <p>I cannot learn that he gave, in his youth, any evidence
of that precocity which sometimes distinguishes
uncommon genius. His companions recollect no
instance of premature wit, no striking sentiment, no flash
of fancy, no remarkable beauty or strength of
expression; find no indication, however slight, either of
that impassioned love of liberty, or of that adventurous
daring and intrepidity, which marked, so strongly, his
future character. So far was he, indeed, from exhibiting
any one prognostic of his greatness, that every
omen foretold a life, at best of mediocrity, if not of
insignificance. His person is represented as having been
coarse, his manners uncommonly awkward, his dress
slovenly, his conversation very plain, his aversion to study
invincible, and his faculties almost entirely benumbed by
indolence. No persuasion could bring him either to read
or to work. On the contrary, he ran wild in the forest,
like one of the <hi rend="italics">aborigines</hi> of the country, and divided
his life between the dissipation and uproar of the chase,
and the languor of inaction.</p>
          <p>His propensity to observe and comment upon the
human character, was, so far as I can learn, the only
circumstance, which distinguished him, advantageously,
from his youthful companions. This propensity seems
to have been born with him, and to have exerted itself,
instinctively, the moment that a new subject was
presented to his view. Its action was incessant, and it
became, at length, almost the only intellectual exercise in
which he seemed to take delight. To this cause may
be traced that consummate knowledge of the human
heart which he finally attained, and which enabled him,
when he came upon the public stage, to touch the springs
of passion with a master-hand, and to controul the
resolutions and decisions of his hearers, with a power,
almost more than mortal.</p>
          <pb id="wirt7" n="7"/>
          <p>From what has been already stated, it will be seen,
how little education had to do with the formation of this
great man's mind. He was, indeed, a mere child of
nature, and nature seems to have been too proud
and too jealous of her work, to permit it to be touched
by the hand of art. She gave him Shakespeare's
genius, and bade him, like Shakspeare, to depend on
that alone. Let not the youthful reader, however, deduce,
from the example of Mr. Henry, an argument in
favour of indolence and the contempt of study. Let
him remember that the powers which surmounted the
disadvantage of those early habits, were such as very
rarely appear upon this earth. Let him remember,
too, how long the genius, even of Mr. Henry, was kept
down and hidden from the public view, by the sorcery
of those pernicious habits; through what years of
poverty and wretchedness they doomed him to struggle;
and, let him remember; that at length, when in the
zenith of his glory, Mr. Henry himself, had frequent occasions
to deplore the consequences of his early neglect of
literature, and to bewail “the ghosts of his departed hours.”</p>
          <p>His father, unable to sustain, with convenience, the
expense of so large a family as was now multiplying on
his hands, found it necessary to qualify his sons, at a
very early age, to support themselves. With this view,
Patrick was placed, at the age of fifteen, behind the
counter of a merchant in the country. How he
conducted himself in this situation, I have not been able to
learn. There could not, however, I presume, have
been any flagrant impropriety in his conduct, since, in
the next year, his father considered him qualified to
carry on business, on his own account. Under this
impression, he purchased a small adventure of goods for
<pb id="wirt8" n="8"/>
his two sons, William and Patrick, and, according to
the language of the country, “set them up in trade.”
William's habits of idleness were, if possible, still more
unfortunate than Patrick's. The chief management of
their concerns devolved, therefore, on the younger brother,
and that management seems to have been most wretched.</p>
          <p>Left to himself, all the indolence of his character
returned. Those unfortunate habits which he had formed,
and whose spell was already, too strong to be broken,
comported very poorly with that close attention,
that accuracy and persevering vigour, which are essential
to the merchant. The drudgery of retailing and of
book-keeping soon became intolerable; yet he was
obliged to preserve appearances by remaining,
continually, at his stand. Besides these unpropitious habits,
there was still another obstacle to his success, in the natural
kindness of his temper. “He could not find it in
his heart” to disappoint any one who came to him for
<hi rend="italics">credit</hi>; and he was very easily satisfied by apologies for
non-payment. He condemned, in himself, this facility
of temper, and foresaw the embarrassments with which
it threatened him; but he was unable to overcome it.
Even with the best prospects, the confinement of such
a business would have been scarcely supportable; but
with those which now threatened him, his store
became a prison. To make the matter still worse, the
joys of the chase, joys now to him forbidden, echoed
around him every morning, and by their contrast, and
the longings which they excited, contributed to deepen
the disgust which he had taken to his employments.</p>
          <p>From these painful reflections, and the gloomy forebodings
which darkened the future, he sought, at first,
a refuge in music, for which it seems he had a natural
<pb id="wirt9" n="9"/>
taste, and he learned to play well on the violin and on
the flute. From music he passed to books, and, having
procured a few light and elegant authors, acquired, for
the first time, a relish for reading.</p>
          <p>He found another relief, too, in the frequent opportunities
now afforded him of pursuing his favourite study
of the human character. The character of every
customer underwent this scrutiny; and that, not with
reference either to the integrity or solvency of the individual,
in which one would suppose that Mr. Henry would feel
himself most interested; but in relation to the structure of
his mind, the general cast of his opinions, the motives
and principles which influenced his actions, and what
may be called the philosophy of character. In pursuing
these investigations, he is said to have resorted to arts,
apparently so far above his years, and which look so
much like an after-thought, resulting from his future
eminence, that I should hesitate to make the statement,
were it not attested by so many witnesses, and by some
who cannot be suspected of the capacity for having
fabricated the fact. Their account of it, then, is this; that
whenever a company of his customers met in the store,
(which frequently happened on the last day of the week)
and were, themselves, sufficiently gay and animated to
talk and act as nature prompted, without concealment,
without reserve, he would take no part in their discussions,
but listen with a silence as deep and attentive, as
if under the influence of some potent charm. If, on the
contrary, they were dull and silent, he would, without
betraying his drift, task himself to set them in motion,
and excite them to remark, collision, and exclamation.
He was peculiarly delighted with comparing their
characters, and ascertaining how they would, severally, act,
in given situations. With this view he would state an
<pb id="wirt10" n="10"/>
hypothetic case, and call for their opinions, one by one,
as to the conduct which would be proper in it. If they
differed, he would demand their reasons, and enjoy
highly, the debates in which he would thus involve
them. By multiplying and varying those imaginary
cases at pleasure, he ascertained the general course of
human opinion, and formed, for himself, as it were, a
graduated scale of the motives and conduct which are
natural to man. Sometimes he would entertain them
with stories, gathered from his reading, or, as was more
frequently the case, drawn from his own fancy, composed
of heterogeneous circumstances, calculated to excite,
by turns, pity, terror, resentment, indignation, contempt;
pausing, in the turns of his narrative, to observe
the effect; to watch the different modes in which the
passions expressed themselves, and learn the language
of emotion from those children of nature.</p>
          <p>In these exercises, Mr. Henry could have had nothing
in view beyond the present gratification of a natural
propensity. The advantages of them, however,
were far more permanent, and gave the brightest colours
to his future life. For those continual efforts to render
himself intelligible to his plain and unlettered hearers,
on subjects entirely new to them, taught him that clear
and simple style which forms the best vehicle of thought
to a popular assembly; which his attempts to interest and
affect them, in order that he might hear from them the
echo of nature's voice, instructed him in those topics of
persuasion by which men were the most certainly to be
moved, and in the kind of imagery and structure of
language, which were the best fitted to strike and agitate
their hearts. These constituted his excellences as an
orator; and never was there a man, in any age, who
possessed, in a more eminent degree, the lucid and
<pb id="wirt11" n="11"/>
nervous style of argument, the command of the most
beautiful and striking imagery, or that language of passion
which burns from soul to soul.</p>
          <p>In the mean time, the business of the store was rushing
headlong, to its catastrophe. One year put an end
to it. William was then thrown loose upon society, to
which he was never, afterwards, usefully attached;<ref targOrder="U" id="ref4" n="4" rend="sc" target="note4"> *</ref> and
Patrick was engaged, for the two or three following
years, in winding up this disastrous experiment as well
as he could.</p>
          <p>His misfortunes, however, seem not to have had the
effect either of teaching him prudence or of chilling his
affections. For, at the early age of eighteen, we find
him married to a miss Shelton, the daughter of an honest
farmer in the neighbourhood, but in circumstances too
poor to contribute effectually to her support. By the
joint assistance of their parents, however, the young
couple were settled on a small farm, and, here, with the
assistance of one or two slaves, Mr. Henry had to delve
the earth, with his own hands, for subsistence. Such
are the vicissitudes of human life! It is curious to
contemplate this giant genius, destined in a few years to
guide the councils of a mighty nation, but unconscious
of the intellectual treasures which he possessed, encumbered,
at the early age of eighteen, with the cares of a
family; obscure, unknown and almost unpitied; digging,
with wearied limbs and with an aching heart, a small
<note id="note4" n="4" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref4"><p> * I have seen an original letter from col. John Henry to his son William, in
which he remonstrates with him on his wild and dissipated course of life.
There is reason to believe, however, that at a later period, he may have
reformed, since a gentleman, to whom the manuscript of this work was submitted,
notes on this passage, that when he was at college at Williamsburg, he
recollects to have seen William Henry a member of the assembly, from the
county of Fluvanna; that he was called colonel, and was, he afterwards
understood, pretty well provided as to fortune.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt12" n="12"/>
spot of barren earth, for bread, and blessing the hour of
night which relieved him from toil. Little could the
wealthy and great of the land, as they rolled along the
highway in splendour, and beheld the young rustic at
work in the coarse garb of a labourer, covered with
dust and melting in the sun, have suspected that this
was the man who was destined not only to humble their
pride, but to make the prince himself tremble on his
distant throne, and to shake the brightest jewels from the
British crown. Little, indeed, could he himself have
suspected it; for amidst the distresses which thickened
around him at this time, and threatened him not only
with obscurity but with famine, no hopes came to cheer
the gloom, nor did there remain to him any earthly
consolation, save that which he found in the bosom of his
own family. Fortunately for him, there never was a
heart which felt this consolation with greater force. No
man ever possessed the domestic virtues in a higher degree,
or enjoined, more exquisitely, those pure delights
which flow from the endearing relations of conjugal life.</p>
          <p>Mr. Henry's want of agricultural skill, and his unconquerable
aversion to every species of systematic labour,
drove him, necessarily, after a trial of two years, to abandon
his pursuit altogether. His next step seems to have
been dictated by absolute despair; for, selling off his little
possessions, at a sacrifice for cash, he entered, a second
time, on the inauspicious business of merchandize.
Perhaps, he flattered himself that he would be able to
profit by his past experience, and conduct this experiment
to a more successful issue. But if he did so, he
deceived himself. He soon found that he had not changed
his character, by changing his pursuits. His early
habits still continued to haunt him. The same want of
<pb id="wirt13" n="13"/>
method, the same facility of temper, soon became apparent
by their ruinous effects. He resumed his violin, his
flute, his books, his curious inspection of human nature;
and not unfrequently ventured to shut up his store, and
indulge himself in the favourite sports of his youth.</p>
          <p>His reading, however, began to assume a more serious
character. He studied geography, in which it is said
that he became an adept. He read, also, the charters
and history of the colony. He became fond of historical
works generally, particularly those of Greece and
Rome; and, from the tenacity of his memory and the
strength of his judgment, soon made himself a perfect
master of their contents. Livy was his favourite; and
having procured a translation, he became so much
enamoured of the work, that he made it a standing rule
to read it through, once at least, in every year, during
the earlier part of his life. <ref targOrder="U" id="ref5" n="5" rend="sc" target="note5"> *</ref> The grandeur of the
Roman character, so beautifully exhibited by Livy,
filled him with surprise and admiration; and he was
particularly enraptured with those vivid descriptions
and eloquent harangues with which the work abounds.
Fortune could scarcely have thrown in his way, a book
better fitted to foster his republican spirit, and awaken
the still dormant powers of his genius; and it seems not
improbable, that the lofty strain in which he himself
afterwards both spoke and acted, was, if not originally
inspired, at least highly raised, by the noble models set
before him by this favourite author.</p>
          <p>This second mercantile experiment was still more
unfortunate than the first. In a few years it left him a
bankrupt, and placed him in a situation than which it is
difficult to conceive one more wretched. Every atom
of his property was now gone, his friends were unable
 <note id="note5" n="5" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref5"><p> * Judge Nelson had this statement from Mr. Henry himself.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt14" n="14"/>
to assist him any further; he had tried every means of
support, of which he could suppose himself capable, and
every one had failed; ruin was behind him; poverty, debt,
want, and famine before; and, as if his cup of misery
were not already full enough, here were a suffering
wife and children to make it overflow.</p>
          <p>But with all his acuteness of feeling, Mr. Henry
possessed great native firmness of character; and, let me
add, great reliance, too, on that unseen arm which
never long deserts the faithful. Thus supported, he
was able to bear up under the heaviest pressure of
misfortune, and even to be cheerful, under circumstances
which would sink most other men into despair.</p>
          <p>It was at this period of his fortunes, that Mr. Jefferson
became acquainted with him; and the reader, I am
persuaded, will be gratified with that gentleman's own
account of it. These are his words. “My acquaintance
with Mr. Henry commenced in the winter of
1759-60. On my way to the college, I passed the
Christmas holidays, at col. Dandridge's, in Hanover,
to whom Mr. Henry was a near neighbour. During
the festivity of the season, I met him in society every
day, and we became well acquainted, although I was
much his junior, being then in my seventeenth year,
and he a married man. His manners had something
of coarseness in then; his passion was music, dancing
and pleasantry. He excelled in the last, and it attached
every one to him. You ask some account of his
mind and information at this period; but you will
recollect that we were almost continually engaged in the
usual revelries of the season. The occasion perhaps,
as much as his idle disposition, prevented his engaging
in any conversation which might give the measure
either of his mind or information. Opportunity was
<pb id="wirt15" n="15"/>
not, indeed, wholly wanting; because Mr. John Campbell
was there, who had married Mrs. Spotswood, the
sister of col. Dandridge. He was a man of science,
and often introduced conversation on scientific subjects.
Mr. Henry had, a little before, broken up his store, or
rather it had broken him up; but his misfortunes were
not to be traced, either in his countenance or conduct.”</p>
          <p>This cheerfulness of spirit, under a reverse of fortune
so severe, is certainly a very striking proof of the
manliness of his character. It is not, indeed, easy to
conceive that a mind like Mr. Henry's could finally sink
under any pressure of adversity. Such a mind, although
it may not immediately perceive whither to direct
its efforts, must always possess a consciousness of
power sufficient to buoy it above despondency. But, be
this as it may, of Mr. Henry, it was certainly true, as
Doctor Johnson has observed of Swift, that “he was
not one of those who, having lost one part of life in
idleness, are tempted to throw away the remainder in despair.”</p>
          <p>It seems to be matter of surprise, that even yet,
amidst all these various struggles for subsistence, the
powers of his mind had not so developed themselves as
to suggest to any friend the pursuit for which he was
formed. He seems to have been a plant of slow growth,
but, like other plants of that nature, formed for duration,
and fitted to endure the buffetings of the rudest storm.</p>
          <p>It was now, when all other experiments had failed,
that, as a last effort, he determined, of his own accord,
to make a trial of the law. No one expected him to
succeed in any eminent degree. His unfortunate habits
were, by no means, suited to so laborious a profession:
and even if it were not too late in life for him to hope
<pb id="wirt16" n="16"/>
to master its learning, the situation of his affairs forbade
an extensive course of reading. In addition to these
obstacles, the business of the profession, in that quarter,
was already in hands from which it was not easily
to be taken; for (to mention no others) judge Lyons, the
late president of the court of appeals, was then at the
bar of Hanover and the adjacent counties, with an
unrivalled reputation for legal learning; and Mr. John
Lewis, a man, also, of very respectable legal attainments,
occupied the whole field of forensic eloquence.
Mr. Henry, himself, seems to have hoped for nothing
more from the profession than a scanty subsistence for
himself and his family, and his preparation was suited
to these humble expectations; for to the study of a
profession, which is said to require the lucubrations of
twenty years, Mr. Henry devoted not more than six
weeks.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref6" n="6" rend="sc" target="note6"> *</ref> On this preparation, however, he obtained a
license to practise the law. How he passed with two
of the examiners, I have no intelligence; but he himself
used to relate his interview with the third. This was
no other than Mr. John Randolph, who was afterwards
the king's attorney general for the colony; a gentleman
of the most courtly elegance of person and manners, a
polished wit, and a profound lawyer. At first, he was
so much shocked by Mr. Henry's very ungainly figure
and address, that he refused to examine him:
understanding, however, that he had already obtained two
signatures, he entered, with manifest reluctance, on the
business. A very short time was sufficient to satisfy
him of the erroneous conclusion which he had drawn
from the exterior of the candidate. With evident marks
 <note id="note6" n="6" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref6"><p> * So say Mr. Jefferson and judge Winston. Mr. Pope says nine months.
Col. Meredith and Capt. Dabney, six or eight months. Judge Tyler, one
month; and he adds, “This I had from his own lips. In this time, he read
Coke upon Littleton, and the Virginia laws.”</p></note>
<pb id="wirt17" n="17"/>
of increasing surprise (produced no doubt by the peculiar
texture and strength of Mr. Henry's style, and the
boldness and originality of his combinations) he continued
the examination for several hours: interrogating
the candidate, not on the principles of municipal law,
in which he no doubt soon discovered his deficiency,
but on the laws of nature and of nations, on the policy
of the feudal system, and on general history, which last
he found to be his strong hold. During the very short
portion of the examination which was devoted to the
common law, Mr. Randolph dissented, or affected to
dissent, from one of Mr. Henry's answers, and called upon
him to assign the reasons of his opinion. This produced
an argument; and Mr. Randolph now played off
on him, the same arts which he himself, had so often
practised on his country customers; drawing him out
by questions, endeavouring to puzzle him by subtleties,
assailing him with declamation, and watching continually,
the defensive operations of his mind. After a considerable
discussion, he said, “you defend your opinions
well, sir; but now to the law and to the testimony.”
Hereupon he carried him to his office, and opening the
authorities, said to him, “behold the force of natural
reason; you have never seen these books, nor this principle
of the law; yet you are right and I am wrong; and
from the lesson which you have given me (you must
excuse me for saying it) I will never trust to appearances
again. Mr. Henry, if your industry be only half
equal to your genius, I augur that you will do well, and
become an ornament and an honour to your profession.”
It was always Mr. Henry's belief that Mr. Randolph
had affected this difference of opinion, merely to
afford him the pleasure of a triumph, and to make some
atonement for the wound which his first repulse had
<pb id="wirt18" n="18"/>
inflicted. Be this as it may, the interview was followed
by the most marked and permanent respect on the part
of Mr. Randolph, and the most sincere good will and
gratitude, on that of Mr. Henry.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref7" n="7" rend="sc" target="note7"> *</ref></p>
          <p>It was at the age of four and twenty that Mr. Henry
obtained his license. Of the science of law, he knew
almost nothing: of the practical part he was so wholly
ignorant, that he was not only unable to draw a declaration
or a plea, but incapable it is said, of the most common
and simple business of his profession, even of the
mode of ordering a suit, giving a notice, or making a
motion in court. It is not at all wonderful therefore,
that such a novice, opposed as he was by veterans,
covered with the whole armour of the law, should
linger in the background, for three years.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref8" n="8" rend="sc" target="note8">†</ref></p>
          <p>During this time, the wants and distresses of his family
were extreme. The profits of his practice could not
have supplied them even with the necessaries of life;
and he seems to have spent the greatest part of his time,
 <note id="note7" n="7" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref7"><p> * This account of Mr. Henry's examination is given by judge Tyler, who
states it as coming from Mr. Henry himself. It was written before I had
received the following statement from Mr. Jefferson; and although there is
some difference in the circumstances, it has not been thought important
enough to make an alteration of the text necessary. This is Mr. Jefferson's
statement. “In the spring of 1760, he came to Williamsburg to obtain a
license as a lawyer, and he called on me at college. He told me he had
been reading law only six weeks. Two of the examiners, however, Peyton
and John Randolph, men of great facility of temper, signed his license with
as much reluctance as their dispositions would permit them to show. Mr.
Wythe abslutely refused. Robert C. Nicholas refused also at first; but on
repeated importunities and promises of future reading, he signed. These
facts I had afterwards from the gentlemen themselves; the two Randolphs
acknowledging he was very ignorant of the law, but that they perceived
him to be a young man of genius, and did not doubt that he would soon
qualify himself.”</p></note>
 <note id="note8" n="8" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref8"><p>† “He was not distinguished at the bar for near four years.” Judge
Winston: yet Mr. Burk intimates that he took the lead in his profession at
once. 3d vol. 301.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt19" n="19"/>
both of his study of the law and the practice of the first
two or three years, with his father-in-law, Mr. Shelton,
who then kept the tavern at Hanover court house.
Whenever Mr. Shelton was from home, Mr. Henry
supplied his place in the tavern, received the guests, and
attended to their entertainment. All this was very natural
in Mr. Henry's situation, and seems to have been purely
the voluntary movement of his naturally kind and obliging
disposition. Hence, however, a story has arisen, that in
the early part of his life, he was a bar-keeper by
profession. The fact seems not to have been so: but if it
had been, it would certainly have redounded much more
to his honour than to his discredit; for as Mr. Henry
owed no part of his distinction either to birth or fortune,
but wholly to himself, the deeper the obscurity and
poverty from which he emerged, the stronger is the evidence
which it bears to his powers, and the greater glory does
it shed around him.</p>
          <p>About the time of Mr. Henry's coming to the bar, a
controversy arose in Virginia, which gradually produced
a very strong excitement, and called to it, at length, the
attention of the whole state.</p>
          <p>This was the famous controversy between the clergy
on the one hand, and the legislature and people of the
colony on the other, touching the stipend claimed by the
former; and as this was the occasion on which Mr.
Henry's genius first broke forth, those who take an
interest in his life, will not be displeased by a particular
account of the nature and grounds of the dispute. It
will be borne in mind, that the church of England was
at this period, the established church of Virginia; and,
by an act of assembly passed so far back as the year
1696, each minister of a parish had been provided with
an annual stipend of sixteen thousand pounds of tobacco.
<pb id="wirt20" n="20"/>
This act was re-enacted with amendments, in 1748,
and in this form, had received the royal assent. The
price of tobacco had long remained stationary at two
pence in the pound, or sixteen shillings and eight pence
per hundred. According to the provision of the law,
the clergy had the right to demand, and were in the
practice of receiving payment of their stipend, in the
specific tobacco; unless they chose, for convenience,
to commute it for money at the market price. In the
year 1755, however, the crop of tobacco, having fallen
short, the legislature passed “an act to enable the
inhabitants of this colony, to discharge their tobacco
debts in money for the present year:” by the provisions
of which “all persons from whom any tobacco was due,
were authorized to pay the same either in tobacco, or in
money, <hi rend="italics">after the rate of sixteen shillings and eight pence
per hundred, at the option of the debtor</hi>.” This act was
to continue in force for ten months and no longer, and
did not contain the usual clause of suspension, <hi rend="italics">until it
should receive the royal assent</hi>. Whether the scarcity of
tobacco was so general and so notorious, as to render
this act a measure of obvious humanity and necessity, or
whether the clergy were satisfied by its generality, since
it embraced sheriffs, clerks, attornies, and all other
tobacco creditors, as well as themselves, or whether
they acquiesced in it as a temporary expedient, which
they supposed not likely to be repeated, it is certain that
no objection was made to the law at that time. They
could not indeed, have helped observing the benefits
which the rich planters derived from the act; for they
were receiving from fifty to sixty shillings per hundred
for their tobacco, while they paid off their debts, due in
that article, at the old price of sixteen shillings and eight
pence. Nothing, however, was then said in defence
<pb id="wirt21" n="21"/>
either of the royal prerogative, or of the rights of the
clergy, but the law was permitted to go peaceably
through its ten months operation. The great tobacco
planters had not forgotten the fruits of this act, when,
in the year 1758, <hi rend="italics">upon a surmise</hi> that another short
crop was likely to occur, the provisions of the act of
1755 were re-enacted, and the new law, like the former,
contained no suspending clause. The crop, as had
been anticipated, did fall short, and the price of tobacco
rose immediately from sixteen and eight pence to fifty
shillings per hundred. The clergy now took the alarm,
and the act was assailed by an indignant, sarcastic, and
vigorous pamphlet, entitled “The Two-Penny Act,”
from the pen of the Rev. John Camm, the rector of
York-Hampton parish, and the Episcopalian commissary
for the colony.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref9" n="9" rend="sc" target="note9"> *</ref> He was answered by two pamphlets,
written, the one by col. Richard Bland, and the
other by col. Landon Carter, in both which the commissary
was very roughly handled. He replied, in a
still severer pamphlet, under the ludicrous title of “The
Colonels Dismounted.” The colonels rejoined; and this
war of pamphlets, in which, with some sound argument,
there was a great deal of what Dryden has called “the
horse play of raillery,” was kept up, until the whole
colony, which had at first looked on for amusement,
kindled seriously in the contest from motives of
interest. Such was the excitement produced by the
discussion, and at length so strong the current against
the clergy, that the printers found it expedient to shut
their presses against them in this colony, and Mr. Camm
 <note id="note9" n="9" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref9"><p> * The governor of Virginia represented the king; the council, the house
of lords; and the Episcopalian commissary (a member of the council)
represented the spiritual part of that house; the house of burgesses, was, of course,
the house of commons.</p></note><pb id="wirt22" n="22"/>
had at last to resort to Maryland for publication. These
pamphlets are still extant; and it seems impossible to
deny, at this day, that the clergy had much the best of
the argument. The king in his council, took up the
subject, denounced the act of 1755 as an usurpation,
and declared it utterly null and void. Thus supported,
the clergy resolved to bring the question to a judicial
test; and suits were accordingly brought by then, in the
various county courts of the colony, to recover their
stipends in the specific tobacco. They selected the
county of Hanover as the place of the first experiment;
and this was made in a suit instituted by the Rev. James
Maury,<ref targOrder="U" id="ref10" n="10" rend="sc" target="note10"> *</ref> against the collector of that county and his
sureties. The record of this suit is now before me.
The declaration is founded on the act of 1748 which
gives the tobacco; the defendants pleaded specially the
act of 1758, which authorizes the commutation into
money, at sixteen and eight pence: to this plea the
plaintiff demurred; assigning, for causes of demurrer,
first, that the act of 1758, not having received the royal
assent, had not the force of a law; and, secondly, that
the king, in council, had declared that act null and
void. The case stood for argument on the demurrer
to the November term, 1763, and was argued by Mr.
Lyons for the plaintiff, and Mr. John Lewis for the
defendants; when the court, very much to the credit of
their candour and firmness, breasted the popular current
by sustaining the demurrer. Thus far the clergy sailed
before the wind, and concluded, with good reason, that
<note id="note10" n="10" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref10"><p> * Mr. Burk (vol. 3d. page 303) makes the Rev. Patrick Henry the plaintiff
in this cause; in this he is corrected by the records of the County. Mr. Burk,
also, sets down “The Two-Penny Act” to the speculations of a man by the
name of Dickinson; in this he is confuted by the act itself; the preamble
expressly founding it, on the shortness of the crop.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt23" n="23"/>
their triumph was complete: for the act of 1758 having
been declared void by the judgment on the demurrer;
that of 1748 was left in full force, and became, in law,
the only standard for the finding of the jury. Mr. Lewis
was so thoroughly convinced of this, that he retired
from the cause; informing his clients that it had been,
in effect, decided against them, and that there remained
nothing more for him to do. In this desperate situation,
they applied to Patrick Henry, and he undertook to
argue it for them before the jury, at the ensuing term.
Accordingly, on the first day of the following December,
he attended the court, and, on his arrival, found on the
court-yard, such a concourse, as would have appalled
any other man in his situation. They were not the
people of the county merely, who were there, but
visitors from all the counties, to a considerable distance
around. The decision upon the demurrer, had produced
a violent ferment amongst the people, and equal exultation
on the part of the clergy; who attended the court in
a large body, either to look down opposition, or to enjoy
the final triumph of this hard fought contest, which they
now considered as perfectly secure. Among many
other clergymen, who attended on this occasion, came
the Reverend Patrick Henry, who was the plaintiff in
another cause of the same nature, then depending in
court. When Mr. Henry saw his uncle approach, he
walked up to his carriage, accompanied by col. Meredith,
and expressed his regret at seeing him there.
“Why so?” enquired the uncle. “Because, sir,” said
Mr. Henry, “you know that I have never yet spoken
in public, and I fear that I shall be too much overawed
by your presence, to be able to do my duty to my clients;
besides sir, I shall be obliged to say some <hi rend="italics">hard things</hi>
of the clergy, and I am very unwilling to give pain to
<pb id="wirt24" n="24"/>
your feelings.” His uncle reproved him for having
engaged in the cause; which Mr. Henry excused by
saying, that the clergy had not thought him worthy of
being retained on their side, and he knew of no moral
principle by which he was bound to refuse a fee
from their adversaries; besides, he confessed, that in
this controversy, both his heart and judgment, as well
as his professional duty, were on the side of the people;
he then requested that his uncle would do him the
favour to leave the ground. “Why, Patrick,” said the
old gentleman with a good-natured smile, “as to <hi rend="italics">your</hi>
saying hard things of the clergy, I advise you to let that
alone—take my word for it, you will do yourself more
harm than you will them; and as to my leaving the
ground, I fear, my boy, that my presence could neither
do you harm or good, in such a cause. However; since
you seem to think otherwise, and desire it of me, so
earnestly, you shall be gratified.” Whereupon, he
entered his carriage again, and returned home.</p>
          <p>Soon after the opening of the court, the cause was
called. It stood on a writ of inquiry of damages, no plea
having been entered by the defendants since the judgment
on the demurrer. The array before Mr. Henry's
eyes was now most fearful. On the bench sat more than
twenty clergymen, the most learned men in the colony,
and the most capable, as well as the severest critics before
whom it was possible for him to have made his <hi rend="italics">debut</hi>. The court house was crowded with an overwhelming
multitude, and surrounded with an immense and anxious
throng, who not finding room to enter, were endeavouring
to listen without, in the deepest attention. But there
was something still more awfully disconcerting than all
this; for in the chair of the presiding magistrate, sat no
other person, than his own father. Mr. Lyons opened
<pb id="wirt25" n="25"/>
the cause very briefly: in the way of argument he did
nothing more than explain to the jury, that the decision
upon the demurrer had put the act of 1750 entirely out
of the way, and left the law of 1748 as the only standard
of their damages; he then concluded with a highly
wrought eulogium on the benevolence of the clergy.
And, now, came on the first trial of Patrick Henry's
strength. No one had ever heard him speak, and curiosity
was on tiptoe. He rose very awkwardly, and faultered
much in his exordium. The people hung their
heads at so unpromising a commencement; the clergy
were observed to exchange sly looks with each other;
and his father is described as having almost sunk with
confusion, from his seat. But these feelings were of
short duration, and soon gave place to others, of a very
different character. For, now, were those wonderful
faculties which he possessed, for the first time developed;
and now, was first, witnessed that mysterious and almost
supernatural transformation of appearance, which the
fire of his own eloquence never failed to work in him.
For as his mind rolled along, and began to glow from
its own action, all the <hi rend="italics"><foreign lang="lat">exuviæ</foreign></hi> of the clown, seemed to
shed themselves, spontaneously. His attitude, by degrees,
became erect and lofty. The spirit of his genius
awakened all his features. His countenance shone with
a nobleness and grandeur which it had never before
exhibited. There was a lightning in his eyes which
seemed to rive the spectator. His action became graceful,
bold, and commanding; and in the tones of his voice,
but more especially in his emphasis, there was a peculiar
charm, a magic, of which any one who ever heard
him, will speak as soon as he is named, but of which no
one can give any adequate description. They can only
say that it struck upon the ear and upon the heart,
<pb id="wirt26" n="26"/>
<hi rend="italics">in a manner which language cannot tell</hi>. Add to all these,
his wonder-working fancy, and the peculiar phraseology
in which he clothed its images; for he painted to the heart
with a force that almost petrified it. In the language
of those who heard him on this occasion, “he made
their blood run cold, and their hair to rise on end.”</p>
          <p>It will not be difficult for any one, who ever heard
this most extraordinary man, to believe the whole
account of this transaction which is given by his
surviving hearers; and from their account, the court house
of Hanover county, must have exhibited on this occasion,
a scene as picturesque, as has been ever witnessed
in real life. They say, that the people, whose
countenances had fallen as he arose, had heard but a
very few sentences before they began to look up; then
to look at each other with surprise, as if doubting the
evidence of their own senses; then, attracted by some
strong gesture, struck by some majestic attitude,
fascinated by the spell of his eye, the charm of his emphasis,
and the varied and commanding expression of his
countenance, they could look away no more. In less
than twenty minutes, they might be seen in every part
of the house, on every bench, in every window, stooping
forward from their stands, in death-like silence; their
features fixed in amazement and awe; all their senses
listening and rivetted upon the speaker; as if to catch
the last strain of some heavenly visitant. The mockery
of the clergy was soon turned into alarm; their triumph
into confusion and despair; and at one burst of his
rapid and overwhelming invective, they fled from the
bench in precipitation and terror. As for the father,
such was his surprise, such his amazement, such his
rapture, that, forgetting where he was, and the character
which he was filling, tears of ecstacy streamed down
<pb id="wirt27" n="27"/>
his cheeks, without the power or inclination to repress them.</p>
          <p>The jury seem to have been so completely bewildered,
that they lost sight not only of the act of 1748, but
that of 1758 also; for thoughtless even of the admitted
right of the plaintiff, they had scarcely left the bar,
when they returned with a verdict <hi rend="italics">of one penny
damages</hi>. A motion was made for a new trial; but the
court too, had now lost the equipoise of their judgment,
and overruled the motion by an unanimous vote. The
verdict and judgment overruling the motion, were followed
by redoubled acclamation, from within and without
the house. The people, who had with difficulty kept
their hands off their champion, from the moment of
closing his harangue, no sooner saw the fate of the
cause finally sealed, than they seized him at the bar, and
in spite of his own exertions, and the continued cry of
“order” from the sheriffs and the court, they bore him
out of the court house, and raising, him on their
shoulders, carried him about the yard, in a kind of
electioneering triumph.</p>
          <p>O! what a scene was this for a father's heart! so
sudden; so unlooked for; so delightfully overwhelming!
At the time, he was not able to give utterance to any
sentiment; but, a few days after, when speaking of it to Mr.
Winston,<ref targOrder="U" id="ref11" n="11" rend="sc" target="note11"> *</ref> he said, with the most engaging modesty, and
with a tremor of voice, which showed how much more
he felt than he expressed; “Patrick spoke in this cause,
near an hour! and in a manner, that surprised me! and
showed himself well informed on a subject, of which I
did not think he had any knowledge!”</p>
          <p>I have tried much to procure a sketch of this celebrated
speech. But those of Mr. Henry's hearers who
 <note id="note11" n="11" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref11"><p>* The present judge Winston.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt28" n="28"/>
survive, seem to have been bereft of their senses. They
can only tell you in general, that they were taken captive;
and so delighted with their captivity, that they
followed implicitly, whithersoever he led them. That,
at his bidding, their tears flowed from pity, and their
cheeks flushed with indignation. That when it was
over, they felt as if they had just awaked from some
ecstatic dream, of which they were unable to recal or
connect the particulars. It was such a speech as they
believe had never before fallen from the lips of man;
and to this day, the old people of that county cannot
conceive that a higher compliment can be paid to a speaker
than to say of him, in their own homely phrase, <hi rend="italics">“he is
almost equal to Patrick, when he plead against the parsons.”</hi></p>
          <p>The only topic of this speech of which any authentic
account remains, is the order of the king in council,
whereby the act of 1758 had been declared void. This
subject, had in truth been disposed of by the demurrer;
and, in strictness of proceeding, neither Mr. Henry nor
the jury had any thing to do with it. The laxity of the
county court practice, however, indulged him in the
widest career he chose to take, and he laid hold of this
point, neither with a feeble or hesitating hand; but boldly
and vigorously pressed it upon the jury, and that, too,
with very powerful effect. He insisted on the connection
and reciprocal duties between the king and his
subjects; maintained that government was a conditional
compact, composed of unusual and dependent covenants,
of which a violation by one party discharged the other;
and intrepidly contended that the disregard which had
been shown in this particular, to the pressing wants of the
colony, was an instance of royal misrule, which had thus
far dissolved the political compact, and left the people
<pb id="wirt29" n="29"/>
at liberty to consult their own safety; that they had
consulted it by the act of 1758, which, therefore,
notwithstanding the dissent of the king and his council,
ought to be considered as the law of the land, and the
only legitimate measure of the claims of the clergy.</p>
          <p>The nature of this topic, and the earnest and
undaunted manner in which Mr. Henry is said to have
pursued and maintained it, proves, that even at this period,
which has been marked as the era of our greatest
attachment and devotion to the parent country, <hi rend="italics">his</hi>
mind at least, was disposed to pry into the course of the
regal administration, and to speak forth his sentiments
without any fear of the consequences. The reception
which the people gave to the argument, proves that they
also, had no superstitious repugnance to the consideration
of such topics, nor any very insuperable horror at
the idea of a separation. Not that there is ground to
suspect that any one had at this time, realized such an
event, or even contemplated it as desirable. The suggestion,
therefore, which I have sometimes heard, that
Mr. Henry was already meditating the independence of
the colonies, and sowing the seeds of those reflections
which he wished to ripen into revolt, is in my opinion,
rather curious than just. I believe that he thought of
nothing beyond success in his cause; and since the
desperate posture in which he found it, demanded a daring
and eccentric course, he adopted that which has been
already stated. The character of his argument, proves
indeed, that he was naturally a bold and intrepid enquirer,
who was not to be overawed from his purpose
by the name even of sovereignty itself; and of course
that he was made of good revolutionary materials. But
an adequate provocation had not, at this time, been
given: and it would be imputing to Mr. Henry a criminal
<pb id="wirt30" n="30"/>
ambition, of which there is no proof; to suppose
that he was meditating the subversion of a government,
against which the voice of serious complaint had not
yet been heard. Besides, Mr. Henry's standing in society
was at this period so humble, as to have rendered
the meditation of such a purpose, on his part, presumptuous
in the extreme; and equally inconsistent both with
his unassuming modesty, and that natural good sense
and accurate judgment, which are on all hands, assigned
to him.</p>
          <p>Immediately on the decision of this cause, he was
retained on all the cases, within the range of his practice,
which depended on the same question. But no
other case was ever brought to trial. They were all,
throughout the colony, dismissed by the plaintiffs; nor
was any appeal ever prosecuted in the case of Mr.
Maury. The reason assigned for this by Mr. Camm, is,
that the legislature had voted money to support the appeal
on the part of the defendants, and that the clergy
were not rich enough to contend against the whole
wealth and strength of the colony.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref12" n="12" rend="sc" target="note12"> *</ref></p>
          <p>The clergy took their revenge in an angry pamphlet
from the pen of Mr. Camm, in which a very
 <note id="note12" n="12" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref12"><p> * Mr. Camm is right as to the interference of the legislature. I have not
been able, however, to find any resolution of the legislature, to this effect,
earlier than the 7th of April, 1767: whereas Mr. Maury's case was decided
in Hanover, on the 1st December, 1763. The following is extracted from
the journal of the day, first mentioned.</p><q type="resolution" direct="unspecified"><p>“On a motion made,</p><p>“Resolved, that the committee of correspondence be directed to write
to the agent, to defend the parish collectors from all appeals from judgments
here given, in suits brought by the clergy, for recovering their salaries,
payable on or before the last day of May, 1759; and that this house will engage
to defray the expense thereof.”</p></q></note>
<pb id="wirt31" n="31"/>
contemptuous account is given both of the advocate and
the court. Mr. Henry is stigmatized in it <hi rend="italics">as an obscure
attorney</hi>; and the epithet was true enough as to the
time past, but it was true no longer. His sun had
risen with a splendour which had never before been
witnessed in this colony; and never afterward, did it
disgrace this glorious rising.</p>
        </div2>
        <div2 type="chapter">
          <pb id="wirt32" n="32"/>
          <head>SECTION II.</head>
          <p>IT is almost unnecessary to state that the display
which Mr. Henry had made in <hi rend="italics">“the parsons' cause,”</hi> as
it was popularly called, placed him, at once, at the head
of his profession, in that quarter of the colony in which
he practised. He became the theme of every tongue.
He had exhibited a degree of eloquence, which the
people had never before witnessed; a species of
eloquence too, entirely new at the bar, and altogether his
own. He had formed it on no living model; for there
was none such in the country. He had not copied it
from books, for they had described nothing of the kind;
or if they had, he was a stranger to their contents. Nor
had he formed it himself, by solitary study and exercise;
for he was far too indolent for any such process. It was
so unexampled, so unexpected, so instantaneous, and so
transcendent in its character, that it had, to the people,
very much the appearance of supernatural inspiration.
He was styled <hi rend="italics">“the orator of nature:”</hi> and was, on that
account, much more revered by the people than if he
had been formed by the severest discipline of the
schools; for they considered him as bringing his credentials
directly from heaven, and owing no part of his greatness
to human institutions.</p>
          <p>There were other considerations also, which drew
him still more closely to the bosom of the people. The
society of Virginia, was at that time pretty strongly
discriminated. A gentleman who lived in those days,
and who had the best opportunities of judging on the
subject, has furnished the following interesting picture of it.</p>
          <pb id="wirt33" n="33"/>
          <p>“To state the differences between the classes of the
society and the lines of demarcation which separated
them, would be difficult. The law, you know, admitted
none, except as to the twelve counsellors. Yet in a
country insulated from the European world, insulated from
its sister colonies, with whom there was scarcely any
intercourse, little visited by foreigners, and having little
matter to act upon within itself, certain families had risen
to splendour by wealth, and by the preservation of it
from generation to generation under the law of entails;
some had produced a series of men of talents; families
in general had remained <hi rend="italics">stationary</hi> on the grounds of
their forefather, for there was no emigration to the
westward in those days; the Irish, who had gotten
possession of the valley between the Blue Ridge and the
North Mountain, formed a barrier over which none
ventured to leap; and their manners presented no attraction
to the lowlanders to settle among them. In such
a state of things, scarcely admitting any change of
station, society would settle itself down into several
<hi rend="italics">strata</hi>, separated by no marked lines, but shading off
imperceptibly from top to bottom, nothing disturbing
the order of their repose. There were, then, first
aristocrats, composed of the great landholders who had
seated themselves below tide water on the main rivers,
and lived in a style of luxury and extravagance, insupportable
by the other inhabitants, and which, indeed, ended,
in several instances, in the ruin of their own fortunes.
Next to these were what might be called <hi rend="italics">half breeds</hi>;
the descendants of the younger sons and daughters of
the aristocrats, who inherited the pride of their ancestors,
without their wealth. Then came the pretenders,
men who from vanity, or the impulse of growing wealth,
or from that enterprize which is natural to talents,
<pb id="wirt34" n="34"/>
sought to detach themselves from the plebeian ranks, to
which they properly belonged, and imitated, at some
distance, the manners and habits of the great. Next to
these, were a solid and independent yeomanry, looking
askance at those above, yet not venturing to jostle them.
And last and lowest, a <hi rend="italics"><foreign lang="lat">feculum</foreign></hi> of beings called overseers,
the most abject, degraded, unprincipled race;
always cap in hand to the dons who employed them, and
furnishing materials for the exercise of their pride,
insolence, and spirit of domination.”</p>
          <p>It was from the body of the yeomanry, whom my
correspondent represents as “looking askance” at those
above them, that Mr. Henry proceeded. He belonged
to the body of the people. His birth, education, fortune,
and manners, made him one of themselves. They
regarded him, therefore, as their own property, and sent
to them, expressly for the very purpose of humbling
the pride of the mighty and exalting the honour of his
own class.</p>
          <p>Mr. Henry had too much sagacity not to see this
advantage, and too much good sense not to keep and to
improve it. He seems to have formed to himself, very
early in life, just views of society, and to have acted
upon them with the most laudable system and perseverance.
He regarded government as instituted solely
for the good of the people; and not for the benefit of
those, who had contrived to make a job of it. He looked
upon the body of the people, therefore, as the <hi rend="italics">basis</hi>
of society, the fountain of all power, and, directly or
indirectly, of all offices and honours, which had been
instituted, originally, for <hi rend="italics">their</hi> use. He made it no secret,
therefore, nay he made it his boast, that on every occasion,
“he bowed to the majesty of the people.” With
regard to himself, he saw, very distinctly, that all his
<pb id="wirt35" n="35"/>
hopes rested on the people's favour. He, therefore,
adhered to them with unshaken fidelity. He retained
their manners, their customs, all their modes of life, with
religious caution. He dressed as plainly as the plainest
of them; ate only the homely fare, and drank the simple
beverage of the country; mixed with them on a
footing of the most entire and perfect equality, and
conversed with them, even in their own vicious and
depraved pronunciation.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref13" n="13" rend="sc" target="note13"> *</ref></p>
          <p>If this last were the effect of artful compliance, as
has been strenuously affirmed, it was certainly carrying
the system farther than dignity would warrant. Mr.
Henry should have been the instructor as well as the
friend of the people, and by his example, have corrected,
instead of adopting their errors. It is very certain
that by this course he disgusted many of those whom
it was often his business to persuade; not because they
considered it as a proof of vulgarity and ignorance, but
because they regarded it as a premeditated artifice to
catch the favour and affections of the people. That it
was so, I am not disposed to believe. I think it much
more probable, that those errors of pronunciation were
the effect of early and inveterate habit, which had
become incurable before he was informed of his mistake.
He had no occasion to resort to such petty artifices,
either to gain or to hold the affections of the people.
He held them by a much higher and a much
firmer title; the simplicity of his manners; the
<note id="note13" n="13" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref13"><p> * Governor Page relates, that he once heard him express the following
sentiments, in this vicious pronunciation: “<hi rend="italics">Naiteral</hi> parts <hi rend="italics">is</hi> better than all
the <hi rend="italics">larnin</hi> upon <hi rend="italics">yearth;</hi>” but the accuracy of Mr. Page's memory is
questioned in this particular, by the acquaintances of Mr. Henry, who say, that
he was too good a grammarian to have uttered such a sentence, although
they admit the inaccuracy of his pronunciation, in some of the words
imputed to him.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt36" n="36"/>
benevolence of his disposition; the integrity of his life; his
real devotion to their best interests; that uncommon
sagacity which enabled him to discern those interests
in every situation; and the unshaken constancy with
which he pursued them, in spite of every difficulty and
danger that could threaten him. From the point of
time of which we are now speaking, it is very certain
that he suffered no gale of fortune, however high or
prosperous, to separate him from the people. Nor did
the people, on their part, ever desert him. He was the
man to whom they looked in every crisis of difficulty,
and the favourite on whom they were ever ready to lavish
all the honours in their gift.</p>
          <p>Middleton, in his life of Cicero, tells us that the first
great speech of that orator, his defence of Roscius
the actor, was made at the age of twenty-seven; the
same age, he adds, at which the learned have remarked,
that Demosthenes distinguished himself in the
assembly of the Athenians: “As if this were the age”
(I quote his own words) “at which these great genios
regularly bloomed towards maturity.” It is rather
curious, than important, to observe, that Mr. Henry
furnishes another instance in support of this theory;
since it was precisely in the same year of his life, that
<hi rend="italics">his</hi> talents first became known to himself and to the
world. Nor let the admirer of antiquity revolt at our
coupling the name of Henry, with those of Cicero and
Demosthenes: it can be no degradation to the orator
either of Greece or Rome, that his name stands enrolled,
on the same page, with that of a man of whom such
a judge of eloquence as Mr. Jefferson has said, that
<hi rend="italics">“he was the greatest orator that ever lived.”</hi></p>
          <p>But the taste of professional fame, which Mr. Henry
had derived from the “parsons' cause,” exquisite as it
<pb id="wirt37" n="37"/>
must have been, was not sufficient to inspire him with a
thirst for the learning of his profession. He had an
insuperable aversion to <hi rend="italics">the old black letter of the law
books</hi>, (which was often a topic of raillery with him,)
and he was never able to conquer it, except for preparation
in some particular cause. No love of distinction,
no necessity however severe, were strong enough to
bind him down to a regular course of reading. He
could not brook the confinement. The reasoning of
the law was too artificial, and too much cramped for
him. Whilst unavoidably engaged in it, he felt as if
manacled. His mind was perpetually struggling to
break away. His genius delighted in liberty and space,
in which it might roam at large, and feast on every
variety of intellectual enjoyment. Hence he was never
profound in the learning of the law. On a question
merely legal, his inferiors, in point of talents, frequently
embarrassed and foiled him; and it required all the
resources of his extraordinary mind, to support the
distinction which he had now gained.</p>
          <p>The most successful practice in the county courts,
was in those days, but a slender dependance for a family.
Notwithstanding therefore, the great addition to
his business which we have noticed, Mr. Henry seems
still to have been pressed by want. With the hope of
improving his situation, he removed, in the year 1764, to
the county of Louisa, and resided at a place called
the Roundabout. Here I have learned nothing
remarkable of him, unless it may be thought so, that he
pursued his favourite amusement of hunting with
increased ardour. “After his removal to Louisa,” says
my informant, “he has been known to hunt deer,
frequently for several days together, carrying his provision
with him, and at night encamping in the woods. After
<pb id="wirt38" n="38"/>
the hunt was over; he would go from the ground to
Louisa court, clad in a coarse cloth coat stained with
all the trophies of the chase, greasy leather breeches
ornamented in the same way, leggings for boots, and a
pair of saddle-bags on his arm. Thus accoutred, he
would enter the court house, take up the first of his
causes that chanced to be called; and if there was any
scope for his peculiar talent, throw his adversary into
the background, and astonish both court and jury by
the powerful effusions of his natural eloquence.”</p>
          <p>There must have been something irresistibly captivating
in Mr. Henry's mode of speaking, even on the
most trivial subjects. The late judge Lyons has been
heard to say of himself, while practising with Mr. Henry,
“that he could write a letter, or draw a declaration
or plea at the bar, with as much accuracy as he could
in his office, under all circumstances, <hi rend="italics">except when Patrick
rose to speak</hi>; but that whenever <hi rend="italics">he</hi> rose, although
it might be on so trifling a subject as a summons
and petition, for twenty shillings, he was obliged to lay
down his pen, and could not write another word, until
the speech was finished.” Such was the charm of his
voice and manner, and the interesting originality of his
conceptions!</p>
          <p>In the fall of 1764, Mr. Henry had an opportunity
of exhibiting himself on a new theatre. A contest
occurred in the house of burgesses, in the case of Mr.
James Littlepage, the returned member for the county
of Hanover. The rival candidate and petitioner was
Nathaniel West Dandridge.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref14" n="14" rend="sc" target="note14"> *</ref> The charge against Mr.
 <note id="note14" n="14" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref14"><p> * Here is another mistake of Mr. Burk's. He states the contest to have
been between col. Syme (Mr. Henry's half brother) and col. Richard
Littlepage. The journal contradicts him and supports the text. There was
no such contest as that of which he speaks; at least between the years 1762
and 1768.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt39" n="39"/>
Littlepage was bribery and corruption. The parties
were heard by their counsel, before the committee of
privileges and elections, and Mr. Henry was on this
occasion employed by Mr. Dandridge.</p>
          <p>Williamsburg, then the seat of government, was the
<hi rend="italics">focus</hi> of fashion and high life. The residence of the
governor; (the immediate representative of the sovereign,)
the royal state in which he lived, the polite and
brilliant circle which he always had about him, diffused
their influence through the city and the circumjacent
country, and filled Williamsburg with a degree of
emulation, taste, and elegance, of which we can form no
conception by the appearances of the present day.
During the session of the house of burgesses, too, these
stately modes of life assumed their richest forms; the
town, was filled with a concourse of visitors, as well as
citizens, attired in their gayest colours; the streets,
exhibited a continual scene of animated and glittering
tumult; the houses, of costly profusion.</p>
          <p>Such was the scene in which Mr. Henry was now
called upon, for the first time, to make his appearance.
He made no preparation for it, but went down just in
the kind of garb which he had been accustomed to
exhibit all his life, and is said to have worn, on this
occasion particularly, a suit which had suffered very
considerably in the service. The contrast which he
exhibited, with the general elegance of the place, was so
striking, as to call upon him the eyes of all the curious
and the mischievous; and, as he moved awkwardly
about, in his coarse and threadbare dress, with a
countenance of abstraction and total unconcern as to what
was passing around him, (interesting as it seemed to
every one else,) he was stared at by some as a prodigy,
and regarded by others as an unfortunate being, whose
<pb id="wirt40" n="40"/>
senses were disordered. When he went to attend the
committee of privileges and elections, the matter was
still worse. “The proud airs of aristocracy,” says
judge Tyler, detailing this incident of Mr. Henry's life,
“added to the dignified forms of that truly august body,
were enough to have deterred any man possessing less
firmness and independence of spirit than Mr. Henry.
He was ushered with great state and ceremony into the
room of the committee, whose chairman was col.
Bland.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref15" n="15" rend="sc" target="note15"> *</ref> Mr. Henry was dressed in very coarse apparel;
no one knew any thing of him,<ref targOrder="U" id="ref16" n="16" rend="sc" target="note16">† </ref>and scarcely was he
treated with decent respect by any one except the chairman,
who could not do so much violence to his feelings
and principles, as to depart on any occasion, from the
delicacy of the gentleman. But the general contempt
was soon changed into as general admiration; for Mr.
Henry distinguished himself by a copious and brilliant
display on the great subject of the rights of suffrage,
superior to any thing that had been heard before within
those walls. Such a burst of eloquence, from a man
so very plain and ordinary in his appearance, struck
the committee with amazement; so that a deep and
<note id="note15" n="15" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref15"><p> * Mr. Tyler says, “that enlightened and amiable man, John Blair;” but
in this he is corrected by the journal, which shows that Mr. Bland was the
chairman of the committee of privileges and elections for that year. I
should have thought, from the general accuracy of Mr. Tyler's statement,
that Mr. Blair might have been officiating as chairman <hi rend="italics"><foreign lang="lat">pro tempore</foreign></hi>, in the
absence of col. Bland; but that Mr. Blair does not appear, by the journal, to
have belonged to the committee, or even to have been a member of the
house in 1764. His name does not appear till 1766.</p><p>Mr. Tyler, reciting Mr. Henry's own narrative, after a lapse of several
years, might very easily have confounded two names as similar as those of
Bland and Blair.</p></note>
<note id="note16" n="16" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref16"><p>† That is, I presume, of his person; for after the very splendid exhibition
which he made in the parsons' cause, his <hi rend="italics">name</hi> could not have been
wholly unknown: the text, however, gives the words of my correspondent
faithfully.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt41" n="41"/>
perfect silence took place during the speech, and not a
sound but from his lips was to be heard in the room.”
So far, judge Tyler. Judge Winston, relating the same
incident, says, “Some time after, a member of the
house, speaking to me of this occurrence, said, he had,
for a day or two, observed an ill-dressed young man
sauntering in the lobby; that he seemed to be a stranger
to every body, and he had not the curiosity to enquire
his name; but, that attending when the case of
the contested election came on, he was surprised to find
this same person counsel for one of the parties; and
and still more so, when he delivered an argument
superior to any thing he had ever heard.” The case,
according to the report of the committee of privileges
and elections, is not one which seems to present much
scope for a very interesting discussion: but Mr. Henry's
was one of those minds which impart interest to every
subject they touch.</p>
          <p>This same year 1764, is memorable for the origination
of that great question which led finally to the independence
of the United States. It has been said by a
gentleman, at least as well qualified to judge as any other
now alive,<ref targOrder="U" id="ref17" n="17" rend="sc" target="note17"> *</ref> that “Mr. Henry certainly gave the first
impulse to the ball of the revolution.” In order to show
the correctness of this position, it is proper to ascertain
the precise point to which the controversy with Great
Britain had advanced, when Mr. Henry first presented
himself in the character of a statesman.</p>
          <p>In March, 1764, the British parliament had passed
resolutions, preparatory to the levying a revenue on the
colonies by a stamp tax. Those resolutions were
communicated to the house of burgesses of Virginia, through
 <note id="note17" n="17" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref17"><p> * Mr. Jefferson.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt42" n="42"/>
their committee of correspondence, by the colonial agent;
and having been maturely considered, resulted in the
appointment of a special committee to prepare an
address to the king, a memorial to the lords, and a
remonstrance to the house of commons. On the 18th of
December, 1764, these papers were reported, and (after
various amendments, which considerably diluted their
spirit) received the concurrence of the council. The
reader will perceive, on perusing them,<ref targOrder="U" id="ref18" n="18" rend="sc" target="note18"> *</ref> that, while they
affirm in clear and strong terms, the constitutional
exception of the colony from taxation by the British
parliament, they breathe nevertheless, a tone so suppliant,
and exhibit such a picture of anticipated suffering from
the pressure of the tax on the exhausted resources of the
colony, as to indicate that no opposition beyond
remonstrance, was at this time, meditated. Remonstrance,
however, was vain. In January, 1765, the famous
stamp act was passed, to take effect in the colonies on
the first of November following. The annunciation of
this measure seems at first to have stunned the continent,
from one extremity to the other. The presses which
spread the intelligence among the people, were themselves
manifestly confounded; and so far from inspiring
the energy of resistance, they seemed rather disposed to
have looked out for topics of consolation, under
submission.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref19" n="19" rend="sc" target="note19">†</ref> The truth is that all ranks of society were
confounded. No one knew what to hope, what more to
fear, or what course was best to be taken. Some,
 <note id="note18" n="18" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref18"><p> * See Appendix. Note A.</p></note>
<note id="note19" n="19" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref19"><p>† Thus in the Pennsylvania Gazette of the 30th of May, 1765—“We hear the sum of money arising from the new stamp duties in North America, for
the first five years, are chiefly to be applied towards making commodious
post-roads from one province to another, erecting bridges where necessary,
and other measures equally important to facilitate an extensive trade.”</p></note>
<pb id="wirt43" n="43"/>
indeed, were fond enough to entertain hopes that the
united remonstrances of the colonial legislatures, the
fate of which had not yet been heard, might induce the
mother country to change her policy; these hopes
however, were faint; and few there were that entertained
them. Many considered submission in the present state
of the colonies, as unavoidable; and that this was the
opinion of Doctor Franklin himself, is apparent from
the remark with which he took leave of Mr. Ingersoll,
on his departure for America.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref20" n="20" rend="sc" target="note20"> *</ref> The idea of resistance
by force, was no where glanced at in the most distant
manner; no heart seems to have been bold enough at
first, to conceive it. Men, on other occasions marked
for intrepidity and decision, now hung back; unwilling to
submit, and yet afraid to speak out in the language of
bold and open defiance. It was just at this moment of
despondency in some quarters, suspense in others, and
surly and reluctant submission wherever submission
appeared, that Patrick Henry stood forth to raise the
drooping spirit of the people, and to unite all hearts and
hands in the cause of his country. With the view of
making way for him and placing him in the public councils
of the country, Mr. William Johnson, who had been
elected a member of the house of burgesses for the
county of Louisa, vacated his seat by accepting the
commission of coroner. The writ of election to supply his
place was awarded on the first of May, 1765, and on
the 20th day of that month, it appears by the journals,
that Mr. Henry was added to the committee for courts
of justice.</p>
          <p>Here, again, he was upon a new theatre, and personally
unknown, except to those few who might have
<note id="note20" n="20" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref20"><p> * “Go home and tell your countrymen to get children as fast as they
can.” GORDON.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt44" n="44"/>
heard his argument on the contested election of Mr.
Littlepage, the preceding winter. His dress and manners
were still those of the plain planter, and in his personal
appearance, there was nothing to excite curiosity
or awaken expectation. The forms of the house, of
which he was now for the first time a member, were,
as has been stated, most awfully dignified; its active
members were composed of the landed aristocracy and
their adherents; and amongst them were men to whose
superiority of talents, as well as influence and power,
the yeomanry of the country had long been accustoned
to bow, with tacit and submissive deference.</p>
          <p>John Robinson, the speaker of the house, was one of
the most opulent men in the colony, and the acknowledged
head of its landed aristocracy. He had now
filled the chair of the house with great dignity, and
without interruption, for five and twenty years. He was
also, the colonial treasurer; and from the high offices
which he held, in connexion with the regal government,
was as warmly attached to its authority by interest, as
he was by taste and fashion, to all the grandeur of its
forms. But, notwithstanding this close alliance with
the court, his personal influence, in every class of
society was very great; and he held that influence by a
tenure far superior to any that his own vast wealth or the
power of the crown could confer. For he possessed a
strong and well informed mind, enlarged and corrected
by great experience, and he united with it, a benevolence
of spirit and a courtesy of manners, which never
failed to attach every heart that approached him. The
poor drew near to him without awe or embarrassment;
they came indeed, with filial confidence; for they never
failed to find in him, a sympathetic friend, and an able
counsellor. The rich enjoyed in him an easy, enlightened,
<pb id="wirt45" n="45"/>
and instructive companion; and, next to the
governor, regarded him as the highest model of elegance
and fashion. An anecdote is related of this gentleman,
which displays in a strong and amiable light, the exalted
force of his feelings, and the truly noble cast of his manners.
When col. Washington (the immortal saviour
of his country) had closed his career in the French and
Indian war, and had become a member of the house of
burgesses, the speaker, Robinson, was directed by a
vote of the house, to return their thanks to that gentleman,
on behalf of the colony, for the distinguished military
services which he had rendered to his county. As
soon as col. Washington took his seat, Mr. Robinson,
in obedience to this order, and following the impulse of
his own generous and grateful heart, discharged the
duty, with great dignity; but with such warmth of
colouring and strength of expression, as entirely
confounded the young hero. He rose to express his
acknowledgments for the honour; but such was his
trepidation and confusion, that he could not give distinct
utterance to a single syllable. He blushed, stammered,
and trembled, for a second; when the speaker relieved
him, by a stroke of address that would have done honour
to Louis the XIV. in his proudest and happiest moment.
“Sit down, Mr. Washington,” said he, with a
conciliating smile; “your modesty is equal to your
valour; and that surpasses the power of any language
that I possess.”<ref targOrder="U" id="ref21" n="21" rend="sc" target="note21"> *</ref></p>
          <p>Peyton Randolph, the king's attorney general, held
the next rank to the speaker. He was not distinguished
for eloquence; but he derived great weight from the
solid powers of his understanding, and the no less solid
 <note id="note21" n="21" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref21"><p> * On the authority of Edmund Randolph.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt46" n="46"/>
virtues of his heart. He was well acquainted with all
the forms of parliamentary proceeding; was an eminent
lawyer, and a well informed and practical statesman.</p>
          <p>Richard Bland was one of the most enlightened men
in the colony. He was a man of finished education,
and of the most unbending habits of application. His
perfect mastery of every fact connected with the settlement
and progress of the colony, had given him the
name of the Virginian Antiquary.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref22" n="22" rend="sc" target="note22"> *</ref> He was a politician
of the first class; a profound logician, and was also
considered as the first writer in the colony.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref23" n="23" rend="sc" target="note23">†</ref></p>
          <p>Edward Pendleton, the <hi rend="italics">protege</hi> of the speaker Robinson,
was also, among the most prominent members in
the house. He had, in a great measure, overcome the
disadvantages of an extremely defective education, and,
by the force of good company and the study of correct
authors, had attained to great accuracy and perspicuity
of style. The patronage of the speaker had introduced
him to the first circles, and his manners were elevated,
graceful and insinuating. His person was spare, but
well proportioned; and his countenance one of the finest
in the world: serene—contemplative—benignant—with
 <note id="note22" n="22" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref22"><p> * Edmund Randolph.</p></note>
 <note id="note23" n="23" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref23"><p>† “He was,” says a correspondent, “the most learned and logical man
of those who took a prominent lead in public affairs; profound in constitutional
lore; but a most ungraceful speaker in debate. He wrote the first
pamphlet on the nature of the connexion with Great Britain, which had any
pretension to accuracy of view on that subject; but it was a singular one;
he would set out on sound principles, pursue them logically, till he found
them leading to the precipice which we had to leap; start back, alarmed;
then resume his ground, go over it in another direction, be led again by the
correctness of his reasoning, to the same place, and again tack about and
try other processes to reconcile right and wrong; but left his reader and
himself, bewildered between the steady index of the compass in their hand,
and the phantom to which it seemed to point. Still there was more sound
matter in this pamphlet, than in the celebrated Farmer's Letters, which were
really but an <hi rend="italics"><foreign lang="lat">ignis fatuus</foreign></hi>, misleading us from true principle.”</p></note>
<pb id="wirt47" n="47"/>
that expression of unclouded intelligence and extensive
reach, which seemed to denote him capable of any thing,
that could be effected by the power of the human mind.
His mind itself, was of a very fine order. It was clear,
comprehensive, sagacious and correct; with a most acute
and subtle faculty of discrimination; a fertility of expedient
which could never be exhausted; a dexterity of
address which never lost an advantage and never gave
one; and a capacity for continued and unremitting application,
which was perfectly invincible. As a lawyer and
a stateman, he had few equals; no superiors. For
parliamentary management, he was without a rival. With
all these advantages of person, manners, address and
intellect, he was also a speaker of distinguished eminence.
He had that silver voice<ref targOrder="U" id="ref24" n="24" rend="sc" target="note24"> *</ref> of which Cicero makes such
frequent and honourable mention—an articulation
uncommonly distinct—a perennial stream of transparent,
cool and sweet elocution; and the power of presenting his
arguments with great simplicity, and striking effect. He
was always graceful, argumentative, persuasive: never
vehement, rapid, or abrupt. He could instruct and delight;
but he had no pretensions to those high powers which are
calculated to “shake the human soul.” George Wythe,
also, a member of the House, was confessedly among
the first in point of abilities. There is a story circulated,
as upon his own authority, that he was initiated by his
mother, in the Latin classics.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref25" n="25" rend="sc" target="note25">†</ref> Be this as it may, it is
certain that he had raised upon the original foundation,
whencesoever acquired, a superstructure of ancient
literature which has been rarely equalled in this country.
He was perfectly familiar with the authors of Greece
 <note id="note24" n="24" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref24"><p> * <hi rend="italics"><foreign lang="lat"> Vox Argentea</foreign></hi>, see the Brutus, <hi rend="italics"><foreign lang="lat">passim</foreign></hi>.</p></note>
 <note id="note25" n="25" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref25"><p>† I heard it from the late judge Nelson, his relation.</p></note>
<pb id="wirt48" n="48"/>
and Rome; read them with the same ease and quoted
them with the same promptitude that he could the
authors in his native tongue. He carried his love of
antiquity rather too far; for he frequently subjected
himself to the charge of pedantry; and his admiration of
the gigantic writers of Queen Elizabeth's reign, had
unfortunately betrayed him into an imitation of their
quaintness. Yet, with all this singularity of taste, he
was a man of great capacity; powerful in argument;
frequently pathetic; and elegantly keen and sarcastic in
repartee. He was long the rival of Mr. Pendleton at the
bar; whom he equalled as a common lawyer, and greatly
surpassed as a civilian: but he was too open and direct
in his conduct, and possessed too little management
either with regard to his own temper or those of other
men, to cope with so cool and skilful an adversary.
Though a full match for Mr. Pendleton in the powers of
fair and solid reasoning, Mr. Pendleton could whenever
he pleased, and would whenever it was necessary,
tease him with quibbles, and vex him with sophistries,
until he destroyed the composure of his mind and robbed
him of his strength. No man was ever more entirely
destitute of art than Mr. Wythe. He knew nothing, even
in his profession, and never would know any thing of
“crooked and indirect by-ways.” Whatever he had to
do, was to be done openly, avowedly and above board.
He would not, even at the bar, have accepted of success
on any other terms. This simplicity and integrity of
character, although it sometimes exposed him to the
arts and sneers of the less scrupulous, placed him
before his countrymen, on the ground which Cæsar wished
his wife to occupy; he was not only pure, but above all
suspicion. The unaffected sanctity of his principles,
united with his modesty and simple elegance of manners,
<pb id="wirt49" n="49"/>
his attic wit, his stores of rare knowledge, his capacity
for business, and the real power of his intellect, not
only raised him to great eminence in public, but rendered
him a delightful companion, and a most valuable friend.</p>
          <p>But Richard Henry Lee was the Cicero of the house.
His face itself, was on the Roman model; his nose
Cæsarean; the port and carriage of his head, leaning
persuasively and gracefully forward; and the whole
contour noble and fine. Mr. Lee was, by far, the most
elegant scholar in the house. He had studied the
classics in the true spirit of criticism. His taste had
that delicate touch, which seized with intuitive certainty,
every beauty of an author, and his genius that native
affinity which combined them without an effort. Into
every walk of literature and science, he had carried this
mind of exquisite selection, and brought it back to the
business of life, crowned with every light of learning,
and decked with every wreath, that all the Muses, and
all the Graces, could entwine. Nor did those light
decorations constitute the whole value of its freight. He
possessed a rich store of historical and political knowledge,
with an activity of observation, and a certainty of judgment,
that turned that knowledge to the very best account.
He was not a lawyer by profession; but he understood
thoroughly the constitution both of the mother country
and of her colonies; and the elements also, of the civil
and municipal law. Thus, while his eloquence was free
from those stiff and technical restraints, which the habits
of forensic speaking are so apt to generate, he had
all the legal learning which is necessary to a statesman.
He reasoned well, and declaimed freely and splendidly.
The note of his voice was deeper and more melodious than
<pb id="wirt50" n="50"/>
that of Mr. Pendleton. It was the canorous voice<ref targOrder="U" id="ref26" n="26" rend="sc" target="note26"> *</ref> of
Cicero. He had lost the use of one of his hands, which
he kept constantly covered with a black silk bandage
neatly fitted to the palm of his hand, but leaving his
thumb free; yet, notwithstanding this disadvantage, his
gesture was so graceful and so highly finished, that it
was said he had acquired it by practising before a
mirror.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref27" n="27" rend="sc" target="note27">†</ref> Such was his promptitude, that he required
no preparation for debate. He was ready for any subject,
as soon as it was announced; and his speech was
so copious, so rich, so mellifluous, set off with such
bewitching cadence of voice, and such captivating grace of
action, that, while you listened to him, you desired to
hear nothing superior, and indeed thought him perfect.
He had a quick sensibility and a fervid imagination,
which Mr. Pendleton wanted. Hence his orations
were warmer and more delightfully interesting; yet still,
to him those keys were not consigned, which could
unlock the sources either of the strong or tender passions.
His defect was, that he was too smooth and too
sweet. His style bore a striking resemblance to that of
Herodotus, as described by the Roman orator: “he
flowed on, like a quiet and placid river, without a ripple.”<ref targOrder="U" id="ref28" n="28" rend="sc" target="note28">‡</ref>
He flowed, too, through banks covered with all
the fresh verdure and variegated bloom of the spring;
but his course was too subdued, and too beautifully
regular. A cataract, like that of Niagara, crowned
with overhanging rocks and mountains, in all the rude
and awful grandeur of nature, would have brought him
nearer to the standard of Homer and of Henry.</p>
          <note id="note26" n="26" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref26">
            <p> * <hi rend="italics"><foreign lang="lat">Vox canora</foreign></hi>, see the Brutus, <hi rend="italics"><foreign lang="lat">passim</foreign></hi>.</p>
          </note>
          <note id="note27" n="27" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref27">
            <p>† Edmund Randolph.</p>
          </note>
          <note id="note28" n="28" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref28">
            <p>‡ <hi rend="italics"><foreign lang="lat">Sine ullis salebris, quasi sedatus amnis, fluit.</foreign></hi> Orat. XII. 39.</p>
          </note>
          <pb id="wirt51" n="51"/>
          <p>These were some of the stars of first magnitude that
shone in the house of burgesses in the year 1765.
There was, yet, a cluster of minor luminaries, which it
were endless to delineate, but whose blended rays
contributed to form that uncommon galaxy, in which the
plebeian Henry was now called upon to take his place.
What had he to enable him to cope with all this lustre of
talents and erudition? Very little more than the native
strength of his character; a constancy of soul, which no
array of power could shake; a genius that designed with
all the boldness of Angelo, and an imagination that
coloured with all the felicity of Titian.</p>
          <p>It has been already stated that Mr. Henry was elected
with express reference to an opposition to the stamp
act. It was not, however, expected by his constituents
or meditated by himself, that he should lead the opposition.
The addresses of the preceding year, made to the
king, lords, and commons, in which so strong a truth
had been stated, as that the stamp act, if persisted in,
would reduce the colony to a state of slavery, founded
a hope, that those who had commenced the opposition
by remonstrance, would continue to give it the <hi rend="italics"><foreign lang="fre">eclat</foreign></hi> of
their high names, by resistance of a bolder character, if
bolder should be necessary. Mr. Henry waited, therefore,
to file in under the first champion that should raise
the banner of colonial liberty. In the mean time another
subject, unexpectedly, occurred to call him up,
and it was on this other, that he made his <hi rend="italics">debut</hi> in the house.</p>
          <p>The incident has been stated to me in the following
terms, by a gentleman who heard the debate.<ref targOrder="U" id="ref29" n="29" rend="sc" target="note29"> *</ref>
 <note id="note29" n="29" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref29"> * Mr. Jefferson.</note>
<pb id="wirt52" n="52"/>
“The gentlemen of this country had, at that time, become
deeply involved in that state of indebtment, which has
since ended in so general a crush of their fortunes.
Mr. Robinson, the speaker, was also the treasurer, an
honour always chosen by the assembly. He was an
excellent man, liberal, friendly, and rich. He had been
drawn in to lend on his own account, great sums of
money to persons of this description, and especially
those who were of the assembly. He used freely for
this purpose the public money, confiding for its replacement
in his own means, and the securities he had taken
on those loans. About this time, however, he became
sensible that his <hi rend="italics">deficit</hi> to the public was become so
enormous, as that a discovery must soon take place, for
as yet the public had no suspicion of it. He devised,
therefore, with his friends in the assembly, a plan for a
public loan office, to a certain amount, from which monies
might be lent on public account, and on good landed
security, to individuals. I find, in Royle's Virginia
Gazette of the 17th of May, 1765, this proposition for
a loan office presented, its advantages detailed, and the
plan explained. It seems to have been done by a
borrowing member, from the feeling with which the motives
are expressed, and to have been preparatory to the
intended motion. Between the 17th and 30th, (the latter
being the date of Mr. Henry's resolutions on the
stamp act,) the motion for a loan office was accordingly
brought forward in the house of burgesses; and had it
succeeded, the deficit due to Robinson on these loans,
would have been transferred to the public, and his <hi rend="italics">deficit</hi>
thus completely covered. This state of things, however,
was not yet known: but Mr. Henry attacked the
scheme on other general grounds, in that style of bold,
grand, and overwhelming eloquence, for which he
<pb id="wirt53" n="53"/>
became so justly celebrated afterward. I had been
intimate with him from the year 1759-60, and felt an
interest in what concerned him; and I can never forget a
particular exclamation of his in the debate, which
electrified his hearers. It had been urged, that, from
certain unhappy circumstances of the colony, men of
substantial property had contracted debts, which, if
exacted suddenly, must ruin them and their families, but
with a little indulgence of time, might be paid with ease.
‘What, sir,’ exclaimed Mr. Henry, in animadverting
on this, ‘is it proposed then, to reclaim the spendthrift
from his dissipation and extravagance, by filling his
pockets with money?’ These expressions are indelibly
impressed on my memory. He laid open with so much
energy the spirit of favouritism, on which the proposition
was founded, and the abuses to which it would
lead, that it was crushed in its birth. He carried with
him all the members of the upper counties, and left a
minority composed merely of the aristocracy of the country.
From this time his popularity swelled apace; and Mr.
Robinson dying, the year afterwards, his <hi rend="italics">deficit</hi> was
brought to light, and discovered the true object of the
proposition.”<ref targOrder="U" id="ref30" n="30" rend="sc" target="note30"> *</ref>
<note id="note30" n="30" rend="sc" place="foot" anchored="yes" target="ref30"> * In reply to this communication, I stated my surprise that no evidence of
this motion was to be found on the journals of the day, and begged my
correspondent to explain it, which he does very satisfactorily in the following
terms. “Abortive motions are not always entered on the journals, or rather
they are rarely entered. It is the modern introduction of yeas and nays
which has given the means of placing a rejected motion on the journals: and
it is likely that the speaker, who, as treasurer, was to be the loan officer, and
had the direction of the journals, would choose to omit an entry of the
motion in this case. This accounts sufficiently for the absence of any trace of
the motion on the journals. There was no suspicion then, (so far at least as
I knew,) that Mr. Robinson had used the public money in private loans to his
friends, and that the secret object of this scheme was to transfer those
debtors to the public, and thus clear his accounts. I have diligently
examined the names of the members on the journals of 1764, to see if any were
still living, to whose memory we might recur on this subject; but I find not
a single one now remaining in life.” This debate must have been in 1765,
instead of 1764. The only surviving member of that year is Paul Carrington,
sen. esq. He took his seat in the house after the debate in question.</note></p>
          <pb id="wirt54" n="54"/>
          <p>The exclamation above quoted by my correspondent
as having electrified Mr. Henry's hearers, is a striking
specimen of one of his great excellences in speaking;
which was, the power of condensing the substance of a
long argument, into one short pithy question. The
hearer was surprised, in finding himself brought so
suddenly and so clearly, to a just conclusion. He could
scarcely conceive how it was effected; and could not
fail to regard, with high admiration, the power of that
intellect, which could come at its ends by so short a
course, and work out its purposes with the quickness
and certainty of magic.</p>
          <p>The aristocracy were startled at such a <hi rend="italics">phenomenon</hi>
from the plebeian ranks. They could not be otherwise
than indignant at the presumption of an obscure and
unpolished rustic, who, without asking the support or
countenance of any patron among themselves, stood
upon his own ground, and bearded them even in their
strong hold. That this rustic should have been able
too, by his single strength, to baffle their whole phalanx
and put it to rout, was a mortification too humiliating
to be easily borne. They affected to ridicule his vicious
and depraved pronunciation, the homespun coarseness
of his language, and his hypocritical canting in relation
to his humility and ignorance. But they could not help
admiring and envying his wonderful gift; that thorough
knowledge of the human heart which he displayed;
that power of throwing his reasoning into short and
clear aphorisms; which, desultory as they were, supplied
in a great degree, the place of method and logic; that
imagination so copious, poetic, and sublime; the irresistible
<pb id="wirt55" n="55"/>
power with which he caused every passion to rise
at his bidding; and all the rugged might and majesty
of his eloquence. From this moment, he had no friends
on the aristocratic side of the house. They looked
upon him with envy and with terror. They were forced
at length to praise his genius; but that praise was
wrung from them, with painful reluctance. They
would have denied it, if they could. They would have
overshadowed it; and did at first try to overshadow it,
by magnifying his defects; but it would have been as
easy for them to have eclipsed the splendour of the sun
by pointing to his spots.</p>
          <p>If, however, he had lost one side of the house by his
undaunted manner of blowing up this aristocratic project,
he had made the other side his fast friends. <hi rend="italics">They</hi>
had listened with admiration, unmixed with envy. Their
souls had been struck with amazement and rapture
and thrilled with unspeakable sensations which they
had never felt before. The man too, who had produced
these effects, <hi rend="italics">was one of themselves</hi>. This was
balm to them; for there is a wide difference between
that distant admiration, which we pay as a tax, due to
long-standing merit, in superior rank, and that throbbing
applause which rushes spontaneously and warm
from the heart, towards a new man and an equal.
There is always something of latent repining, approaching
to resentment, mingled with that respect which is
exacted from us by rank; and we feel 