Dear Genl 2
a Frenchman. and
as you expected the election for the other professor terminated in favor of
Philipps
Five of the committee were present viz
Badger,
Hawkes,
Nash,
Polk and
Haywood
all of whom voted for
Philips
except
Haywood
.3
Although I have no doubt this choice was a judicious one and best suited the interests of the
university—yet I almost wish it was otherways. Poor
Mat
. I cannot look at him, without pitying his loss of the
election. His meritorious exertions had thus far allways been successful,
belonging to a distinguished class and being among the most distinguished of
it's members, since his entrance into the world, he has met the approbation and
received the applauses of nearly all his acquaintances, being in this situation
it must have been truly mortifying to his self pride (and like all other men I
expect he has some) to have been cut out, yet it must be gratifying to him to
know that he stood second among so many competitors for this distinguished
post.As I expected no sooner was the senior class
out of the way, than the faction in the
society which has been so often the subject of our
conversation, with
Sutton
as their head attempted a repeal of the whiskey
laws (as it is usually termed)4 The
resolutions were rejected in the committee but nevertheless were brought
forward in the house, and supported by their author with his usual lengthy,
nonsencial5
declamation, placing his principal argument on the rights of the society to
enact such laws.
Tom
Robards
made a flowery speech in opposition to the resolutions and as he
had much the best side done tolerably well.
Old
Erasmus
who had heard of the resolutions, attended that night and
succeeded
Robards
in the opposition. Although I well knew
North's
powerful reasoning, yet I never recollect to have
heard him speak before when he was much interested, at this time he appeared to
be intensely so, he left off leaning on the desk as is usual with him and stood
forth, a true and able defender of this law, he appeared to be at no loss for
words, and his reasoning was so very conclusive that when the vote was taken,
Sutton
himself was either withheld by shame or something
else and did not vote for the resolutions, and but one man in the house voted
in their favor and he, you will be surprised to learn, was
Crawford
At the suggestion of
Mr Manly6 I
introduced a resolution on last night for the purpose of appointing a committee
who in conjunction with a
Philanthropic committee are to devise some means for
choosing a person to deliver us an oration at our commencements.7 Both
committees have been appointed and I have little doubt but the plan will
succeed and think it will add considerable interest to our commencements. Since
you left here I have become more and more impatient for the arrival of the time
when I shall set out to the lovelest of all places—home—I have given you all the news of
College with the exception of a little scuffle which took
place the other morning in the
Chapel
between
Yarbrough
and
Jordan
about a seat. They were immediately parted and have
been reprimanded before the faculty8—Ere you receive this you no doubt will have
visited
Charlotte
and spent some happy hours with our mutual friends there. May the time soon
roll round when we will again be in
among our friends together and then—but perhaps I am anticipating too
much and if so in the words of
Webster, "I am willing to lay aside the dictates of
prudence and follow the feelings of my own breast"9
Excuse my almost unintelligible hand as I had a bad pen at the beginning and
there is no knifeon the passage10
since
Bob
Allison
has moved away—My compliments to all
Yours &c.—
./
Concord/
No Carolina." The postage endorsement reads "Chap
Hill/3 Jun} 12." To the left of the address, on what would have
been the inside fold of the envelope, a second hand has written "F.
L. Smith
/June 1826/
Chapel Hill
."Smith's
letter is addressed to
Barringer
in
Concord
because
Barringer
already had left
Chapel
Hill for his senior vacation, a one-month holiday granted to graduates
prior to commencement. As letters dating back to 1824 indicate,
Daniel Moreau Barringer
and
Franklin Lafayette Smith
had been friends before coming to
Chapel
Hill, and they continued to correspond after graduating.
as "Genl" is
unusual;
Smith's
other letters to
Barringer
begin, "Dear
Moreau
."
names the following
trustees, who comprised the
Committee of
Appointments:
George
Edmund Badger (Craven
County),
Francis Lister Hawks (Orange
County),
Frederick
Nash (Orange
County),
William
Polk (Wake
County), and
John
Haywood, Sr.
(Edgecombe County).
Badger's proposal to the
trustees on December 15, 1825, established the professorship
of modern languages.
, who had been a member of the
Dialectic
Society, graduated with highest honors in 1824, and in 1826 was serving
as a tutor of mathematics.
proposal was recorded in the
Dialectic
Society minutes of May 31, 1826: "That a comittee consisting of 3
persons be apointed who in conjunction with a committee of the
Philanthropic Soc. shall devise some plan of eliciting an
individual to deliver an oration to the two societies on the day of our annual
commencement" (Vol. 6, UA). At the
Dialectic
Society meeting on June 7, 1826, the committee reported that an
agreement had been reached and that the two societies would alternate selecting
a speaker each year.
of
Hillsborough, NC, and
George
Ryan Jordan
of
Bertie
County, NC.
Yarborough
, a member of the
Dialectic
Society, challenged
Jordan
, a
Philanthropic Society member, to vacate his seat in the
Chapel,
using "reproachful and abusive language." The incident soon escalated
into a scene of "personal violence." Because the two boys had been
upstanding students prior to the outbreak, the faculty merely reprimanded them
(3:66, UA). Both students graduated in 1827.
Yarborough
became a physician, and
Jordan
, a lawyer.
may be paraphrasing the final sentence of
Daniel
Webster's
"Speech upon the Panama Mission," delivered in
the
US House of Representatives in April 1826: "If it be
prudence to meet their proffered civility, not with reciprocal kindness, but
with coldness or with insult, I choose still to follow where natural impulse
leads, and to give up that false and mistaken prudence, for the voluntary
sentiments of my heart" (1:350).