<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite.dtd" [
<!ATTLIST xref url CDATA #IMPLIED>
]>
<TEI.2> 
  <teiHeader date.created="03-01-2005" id="True_and_Candid" type="mss"> 
	 <fileDesc> 
		<titleStmt> 
			<title> <hi rend="bold">"Prejudice Against Composition
				Writing," Class Composition of J. Horace Lacy, [January 1851]:</hi> Electronic Edition.</title> 
		  <author>Lacy, James Horace, 1834-1852</author> 
		  <editor>Erika Lindemann</editor> 
		  <funder>Funding from the State Library of North Carolina supported the
			 electronic publication of this title.</funder> 
		  <respStmt> 
			 <resp>Text transcribed by</resp> 
			 <name>Erika Lindemann</name> 
		  </respStmt> 
		  <respStmt> 
			 <resp>Images scanned by</resp> 
			 <name>Mara E. Dabrishus</name> 
		  </respStmt> 
		  <respStmt> 
			 <resp>Text encoded by</resp> 
			 <name>Brian Dietz</name> 
		  </respStmt> 
		</titleStmt> 
		<editionStmt> 
		  <edition>First Edition, 
			 <date>2005</date> </edition> 
		</editionStmt> 
		<extent>ca. 21K</extent> 
		<publicationStmt> 
		  <publisher>The University Library, University of North Carolina at
			 Chapel Hill </publisher> 
		  <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace> 
		  <date>2005</date> 
		  <availability> 
			 <p>© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina at
				Chapel Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching and
				personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the
				text</p> 
		  </availability> 
		</publicationStmt> 
		<seriesStmt> 
		  <title type="monograph"> <hi rend="italics">True and Candid
			 Compositions: The Lives and Writings of Antebellum Students in North
			 Carolina</hi> </title> 
		  <respStmt> 
			 <resp>written by</resp> 
			 <name>Lindemann, Erika</name> 
		  </respStmt> 
		</seriesStmt> 
		<sourceDesc> 
		  <biblFull> 
			 <titleStmt> 
			 	<title type="collection"> Drury Lacy Papers (#3641), Southern Historical
			 		Collection, University of North Carolina at Chapel
			 		Hill </title> 
			 	<title type="document"> "Prejudice Against Composition
			 		Writing, "Class Composition of J. Horace Lacy, [January 1851] </title> 
				<author>J. Horace Lacy </author> 
			 </titleStmt> 
			 <extent>4 pages, 4 page images</extent> 
			 <publicationStmt> 
				<date value="1851-01">[1851]</date>
			 	<publisher>Southern Historical Collection, 
				  University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</publisher> 
				<authority/> 
			 </publicationStmt> 
			 <notesStmt> 
				<note type="call number">Call number 3641 (Southern Historical
				  Collection, University of North Carolina at Chapel
				  Hill)</note> 
			 </notesStmt> 
		  </biblFull> 
		</sourceDesc> 
	 </fileDesc> 
	 <encodingDesc> 
		<projectDesc> 
		  <p>The electronic edition is a part of the University of North Carolina
			 at Chapel Hill digital library, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American
			 South</hi>.</p> 
		</projectDesc> 
		<editorialDecl> 
		  <p>The text has been encoded using the recommendations for Level 5 of
			 the TEI in Libraries Guidelines.</p> 
		  <p> Transcript of the class composition. Originals are in the Southern
			 Historical Collection, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</p> 
		  <p>Original grammar, punctuation, and spelling have been preserved.</p>
		  <p>DocSouth staff created a 600 dpi uncompressed TIFF file for each image. The TIFF images were then saved as JPEG images at 100 dpi for web access.</p>
		  
		  <p>Page images can be viewed and compared in parallel with the
			 text.</p> 
		  <p>Any hyphens occurring in line breaks have been removed, and the
			 trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding line.</p> 
		  <p>Letters, words and passages marked as deleted or added in originals
			 have been encoded accordingly.</p> 
		  <p>All quotation marks, em dashes and ampersand have been transcribed
			 as entity references.</p> 
		  <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as ".</p>
		  
		  <p>All single right and left quotation marks are encoded as '.</p> 
		  <p>All em dashes are encoded as —.</p> 
		  <p>Indentation in lines has not been preserved.</p> 
		</editorialDecl> 
		<classDecl> 
		  <taxonomy id="lcsh"> 
			 <bibl> 
				<title>Library of Congress Subject Headings</title> </bibl> 
		  </taxonomy> 
		  <taxonomy id="erika"> 
			 <bibl> 
				<title>Erika's vocab</title> </bibl> 
		  </taxonomy> 
		</classDecl> 
	 </encodingDesc> 
	 <profileDesc> 
		<langUsage> 
		  <language id="eng">English</language> 
		</langUsage> 
		<textClass> 
		  <keywords scheme="lcsh"> 
			 <list> 
				<item>
                            <!-- LCSH go here -->
				</item> 
			 </list> 
		  </keywords> 
		  <keywords scheme="erika"> 
			 <list> 
				<item id="topic_concat248">Education/UNC Curriculum</item>
			 	<item id="topic_concat340">Reading and Writing/Composition</item>
			 	<item id="topic_concat356">Examples of Student Writing/Compositions, Examples of</item></list> 
		  </keywords> 
		</textClass> 
	 </profileDesc> 
	 <revisionDesc> 
		
		<change> 
		  <date>2005-04-20,</date> 
		  <respStmt> 
			 <name>Brian Dietz</name> 
			 <resp/> 
		  </respStmt> 
		  <item>finished TEI/XML encoding.</item> 
		</change> 
	 </revisionDesc> 
  </teiHeader> 
  <text id="mss05-02"> 
	 <front> 
		<div1 type="doc_summary" id="doc_sum05-02"> 
		  <head>Document Summary</head> 
		  <p> Lacy's composition gives the reason, the cause, the consequences
			 and the remedy for prejudice against writing compositions, advising the writer
			 to take up familiar subjects, divide the subject into headings, state the
			 proposition he intends to prove at the outset, and subordinate everything else
			 to this proposition.</p> 
		</div1> 
	 </front> 
	 <body> 
		<div1 type="composition"> <pb id="mss05-02-p01" n="1"/> 
			<head>"Prejudice Against Composition
				Writing," Class Composition of 
			 <name id="JHL" type="person" key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace">J.
			 	Horace Lacy</name>, [January 1851]<ref id="ref827" rend="sup" target="note827" type="source">1</ref></head> 
			<head type="original" rend="center"> Prejudice against Composition writing<ref id="ref828" rend="sup" type="edit" target="note828">2</ref>
			 </head> 
		  <p> It is a well known &amp; an established fact that most, if not all
			 men are very much inclined to be prejudiced against composition writing, and
			 consider it a difficult matter to sit down and write a few lines on any
			 subject, however much it may deserve their attention, which is not, in itself,
			 very attractive or interesting to them, which will not bring from them natural
			 &amp; impromptu sentiments, and which is not such, that, in treating it, they
			 can express their ideas with a greater degree of facility &amp; readiness, (on
			 account of their familiarity with it &amp; the interest they have in it) than
			 they could, were it a subject of a different character. This spirit of
			 prejudice not only exists, but also shews itself very plainly in young persons,
			 &amp; in those who are inexperienced in the art of composing well,—I say
			 that this spirit is found fully as much, if not more in these, than in, those
			 who are not advanced in age, &amp; who know more of the toils &amp; fatigues
			 attending him, whose chief desire is his own improvement in this great Art,
			 &amp; who would devote his time, his attention, &amp; his talents to it, &amp;
			 who would sacrifice every thing else for the fulfilment of his desire. But I
			 must beg leave to say, before proceeding any further, apart from the subject
			 itself, that, if it is possible for one to be free, in a great measure, from
			 this feeling of prejudice, I am he who is; for although I feel &amp; know my
			 insignificance as a composer in a class of forty members, &amp; am very
			 sensibly conscious of my inability to throw out any very original idea, or to
			 construe any beautiful sentences, which may adorn the composition &amp; serve
			 as a varnish to conceal the <hi rend="underscore">rude</hi> under work, yet I
			 do not<pb id="mss05-02-p02" n="2"/>shrink back from the task (if it may be so
			 called) with so much dread, as I have seen manifested by some, whom I have
			 always considered far superior to myself in composition. But we must return to
			 our subject &amp; attend with more care &amp; assiduity to those rules, which
			 he, whom we consider high Authority,<ref id="ref829" target="note829" rend="sup" type="edit">3</ref> has instructed us to use &amp; to abide
			 strictly by, lest we too fall into the very same error about which we have been
			 speaking, &amp; become as much prejudiced against comp. w.
			 <add rend="sup" hand="JHL">ourselves</add> as any one can be; for we will
			 certainly get into difficulties if we go at random writing whatever happens to
			 come in our way; &amp; here, we may very easily <hi rend="underscore">account
			 for the fact</hi>, <add hand="JHL" rend="sup">viz</add> <hi rend="underscore">why</hi> young men are at all prejudiced against writing
			 comps.—: Why! they can not even converse with any one, with the least
			 degree of composure, about sitting down two<ref rend="sup" id="ref830" target="note830" type="edit">4</ref> or
			 three hours at a time, &amp; thinking over some subject, a thought of which,
			 (they will say) never crossed the mind of any person. Now for the
			 reason;—if they only had certain rules which might direct them, which
			 might apply very well in different ways in different cases, &amp; by which they
			 might question themselves as to the propriety or the impropriety, the
			 "whys &amp; wherefores" &amp;c &amp;c of their subjects, why! the
			 mere answers to these questions would enable them to progress some, by all
			 means, in their compos: taking away thereby all cause of complaint on account
			 of the lack of subject matter, &amp; consequently taking away as much cause of
			 prejudice; for we suppose that, if they could compose without an effort of the
			 mind, if they only were to write down on paper mere words &amp; sentences
			 without taxing their brains to construe them &amp; to put them in their proper
			 places giving the correct orthography of their language, they would be
			 altogether indifferent as to the matter <hi rend="underscore">but for the
			 writing</hi>. This<ref id="ref831" rend="sup" target="note831" type="edit">5</ref> plan
			 of composing is altogether false; they reject<pb id="mss05-02-p03" n="3"/>with
			 scorn our systematic mode, viz by rules; &amp; they go so far as to call it a
			 humbug; While they indeed are building on a rotten foundation &amp; are writing
			 according to <hi rend="underscore">false</hi> rules (if they write accordig to
			 any) &amp; rules to<ref id="ref832" rend="sup" type="edit" target="note832">6</ref>
			 which will lead to very unsalutery <hi rend="underscore">consequences</hi> in
			 deed. Some of the consequences are these; It is quite evident that those who
			 reject these rules will always have to <hi rend="underscore">wait for a
			 thought</hi> instead of deriving any thing from their rules, as we would do;
			 and it so happens that those who wait for thoughts generally have to wait a
			 pretty long time; &amp; does<ref id="ref833" rend="sup" type="edit" target="note833">7</ref> not
			 this, by theway, remind <add hand="JHL" rend="sup">you</add> of 
			 <name key="pn0001175" reg="Mena, Volteius" type="person">Menas</name> at
			 
			 <name key="pn0001356" reg="Philippi" type="person" rend="no">Philippi's</name>
			 table who, poorfellow! as 
			 <name reg="Horace" type="person" key="pn0000785">Horace</name> expresses
			 it, said—dicunda tacenda—whatever came into his head.<ref id="ref834" rend="sup" target="note834" type="info">8</ref> (I
			 am much of opinion that my quotation comes under the head of tacenda.). But it
			 is well authenticated by the observation of every one, that
			 <del rend="overstrike" hand="JHL">their manner</del> <add rend="sup" hand="JHL">this way—i.e. the above</add> of writing influences the style
			 of compos. of those who practise it considerably, when they grow up to years of
			 manhood; for their productions, <del hand="JHL" rend="overstrike">instead</del>
			 far from being terse, argumentative, convincing, are without head or tail &amp;
			 are generally an incongruous mass mixed up in the most disgusting manner,
			 without divisions or heads &amp; in short without a subject (so to speak). I
			 would advise a young man therefore never to allow himself to fall into this
			 habit of writing loosely; of bringing together and classing under one head
			 subjects as much different as black &amp; white;
			 <del hand="JHL" rend="overstrike">for it is difficult</del> for it is difficult
			 for a person to do this well &amp; the difficulty or impossibility of the
			 matter [activates]<ref id="ref835" rend="sup" target="note835" type="edit">9</ref> that
			 prejudice against comp. writing, which is the subject of our present attempt.
			 But like almost all other things there is a remedy for these terrible
			 consequences of which I was speaking &amp; I can, as well as I know how,
			 express, in a very few words, wherein this remedy consists. To overcome these
			 difficulties &amp; these consequences one should never take a subject on which
			 his limited reading would constrain him to say but little.<pb id="mss05-02-p04" n="4"/>I mean by this that he should always take a familiar subject; and not
			 only this; but he should also divide his subject into heads, never neglecting
			 to state the proposition which he intends to prove, at the outset, &amp; to
			 make every thing else subordinate to this one great head; by practising this
			 rule, or any one like it, he may make great personal advancement in the art
			 &amp; may finally shine as one of the most brilliant writers of the age. A few
			 general remarks &amp; we <del hand="JHL" rend="overstrike">are</del>
			 <add rend="sup" hand="JHL">have</add> done; Composition writing is an art which
			 differs from every other in one particular &amp; it is this; viz; that,
			 wecommence with the hardest &amp; as we proceed we find it becoming easier
			 &amp; easier; in other words, that the principles or elements, as we would call
			 them, are harder than the actual application of them to practical purposes; I
			 might have mentioned this in the former part of my comp. as a reason why we are
			 prejudiced against comp writing; &amp; not have been, by any means wrong as to
			 my statement. Let one, who would improve by this art, as well as in it,
			 practise the few rules, the substance of which I have given once or twice in
			 the course of my comp, &amp; he will succeed in a pursuit which has rendered
			 the names of not afew men immortal. With these few remarks I submit<ref id="ref836" rend="sup" type="edit" target="note836">10</ref> my
			 piece to <hi rend="underscore">your</hi> inspection &amp; criticism, hoping
			 that you will correct all mistakes, with a view to my improvement in a thing,
			 in which I take a good deal of delight. </p> 
		  <closer> 
			 <signed> 
				<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">J H
				  Lacy</name>. 
				<name reg="Raleigh, NC" type="place" key="name0000934">Raleigh</name>.</signed> 
			 <salute>For 
			 	<name key="pn0001756" reg="Wheat, John Thomas" type="person" id="JTW"><hi rend="underscore">Rev</hi> Prof  Wheat D.D.</name><ref id="ref837" rend="sup" target="note837" type="edit">11</ref></salute></closer> 
		</div1> 
	 </body> 
	 <back> 
		<div1 type="notes"> 
		  <note id="note827" rend="sup" target="ref827" type="source"> 
			 <p> 1. 
			 	<xref url="http://www.lib.unc.edu/mss/inv/l/Lacy,Drury.html">Drury
				  Lacy Papers, SHC.</xref> 
				<name key="pn0001756" reg="Wheat, John Thomas" type="person">John
				  Thomas Wheat</name>, professor of rhetoric and logic, corrected the composition
				in pencil. 
				<name key="pn0001756" reg="Wheat, John Thomas" type="person">Wheat</name> also wrote in the upper left corner of page one
				"<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">J H
				  Lacey</name>/5." Though the composition bears no date, 
				<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">Lacy's</name> classmate, 
				<name key="pn0001669" reg="Thompson, George N." type="person">George
				  N. Thompson</name>, discussed the assignment in his diary, in an entry dated
				January 28, 1851: "We did not go to recite Geometry directly after prayers
				as was our custom on Tuesday mornings, but in its stead, had a lecture from 
				<name key="pn0001756" reg="Wheat, John Thomas" type="person">Dr
				  Wheat</name>, on the subject of composition. The suject he chose after the
				lecture for us to write on was what he had said in his lecture—viz.
				'Predujice against composition. What is the fact? Why is it so? What has been
				the consequence What is the remedy?" (<xref url="http://www.lib.unc.edu/mss/inv/t/Thompson,George_Nicholas.html">George
				  N. Thompson Papers, SHC</xref>). The first three questions 
				<name key="pn0001756" reg="Wheat, John Thomas" type="person">Wheat</name> posed appear at the end of Chapter One in 
				<name key="pn0001755" type="person" reg="Whately, Richard" rend="no">Richard
				  Whately's</name> <hi rend="italics"><name key="name0000326" reg="Elements of Rhetoric (Whately)" type="publication" rend="no">Elements of Rhetoric</name></hi> (1828). Other compositions
				corrected by 
				<name key="pn0001756" reg="Wheat, John Thomas" type="person">Wheat</name> in the Drury Lacy Papers include 
				<name type="publication" key="name0001227" reg="&quot;Whether the diversities of individual character be owing more to moral or to physical causes&quot; (Lacy)" rend="no">"Whether
				  the diversities of individual character be owing more to moral or to physical
				  causes"</name>; 
				<name type="publication" key="name0000603" reg="&quot;[Louis] Kossuth&quot; (Lacy)" rend="no">"<name key="pn0000937" reg="Kossuth, Louis [Lajos]" type="person">Kossuth</name>"</name>; 
				<name key="name0000241" type="publication" reg="&quot;Considerations which should influence us in the Choice of a Profession&quot; (Lacy)" rend="no">"Considerations
				  which should influence us in the Choice of a Profession"</name>; 
				<name reg="&quot;University in a City, University in the Country&quot; (Lacy)" type="publication" key="name0001149" rend="no">"University in a City, University in the
				  Country"</name>; and 
				<name reg="&quot;The Pleasures and Pains of College Life&quot; (Lacy)" type="publication" key="name0000885" rend="no">"The Pleasures and Pains of College Life."</name></p>
			 </note> 
		  <note id="note828" target="ref828" type="edit" rend="sup"> 
			 <p>2. 
				<name key="pn0001756" reg="Wheat, John Thomas" type="person">Wheat</name> crossed out <hi rend="italics">w</hi> in
				<hi rend="italics">writing</hi> and wrote <hi rend="italics">W</hi> above the
				word in pencil.</p></note> 
		  <note id="note829" target="ref829" rend="sup" type="edit"> 
			 <p>3. 
				<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">Lacy</name> wrote a lower and upper case <hi rend="italics">a</hi> on top of each other, making it difficult to determine
				whether or not he intended to capitalize <hi rend="italics">authority</hi>. 
				<name key="pn0001756" reg="Wheat, John Thomas" type="person">Wheat's</name> primary textbook for the sophomore composition
				class was 
				<name key="pn0001755" reg="Whately, Richard" type="person" rend="no">Richard
				  Whately's</name> 
				<name type="publication" reg="Elements of Rhetoric (Whately)" key="name0000326" rend="no"><hi rend="italics">Elements of Rhetoric</hi> (1828)</name>. 
				<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">Lacy's</name> composition treats some of the prejudices and rules
				discussed in Chapter One of 
				<name key="pn0001175" reg="Whately, Richard" type="person">Whately's</name> book.</p></note> 
		  <note id="note830" rend="sup" target="ref830" type="edit"> 
			 <p>4. 
				<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">Lacy</name> wrote <hi rend="italics">two</hi> on top of
				<hi rend="italics">2</hi>.</p></note> 
		  <note id="note831" rend="sup" type="edit" target="ref831"> 
			 <p>5. 
				<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">Lacy</name> wrote <hi rend="italics">This</hi> on top of
				<hi rend="italics">Their</hi>.</p></note> 
		  <note id="note832" rend="sup" target="ref832" type="edit"> 
			 <p>6. 
				<name key="pn0001756" reg="Wheat, John Thomas" type="person">Wheat</name> pencilled a second <hi rend="italics">o</hi> above
				<hi rend="italics">to</hi>.</p></note> 
		  <note id="note833" rend="sup" type="edit" target="ref833"> 
			 <p>7. 
				<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">Lacy</name> wrote <hi rend="italics">does</hi> on top of
				<hi rend="italics">is</hi>.</p></note> 
		  <note id="note834" rend="sup" type="info" target="ref834"> 
			 <p>8. 
				<name key="pn0000785" reg="Horace" type="person">Horace</name>, 
				<name type="publication" key="name0000343" reg="Epistles (Horace)" rend="no"><hi rend="italics">Epistles</hi>, I.vii.72</name>: "On coming to supper, he
			 	[<name key="pn0001175" type="person" reg="Mena, Volteius">Volteius
				  Mena</name>] chatted about anything and everything" (1806?).</p></note> 
		  <note id="note835" rend="sup" type="edit" target="ref835"> 
			 <p>9. 
				<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">Lacy</name> wrote the word on top of <hi rend="italics">makes</hi>.</p></note> 
		  <note id="note836" rend="sup" type="edit" target="ref836"> 
			 <p>10. 
				<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">Lacy</name> wrote <hi rend="italics">submit</hi> on top of
				<hi rend="italics">hereby</hi>.</p></note> 
		  <note id="note837" rend="sup" type="edit" target="ref837"> 
			 <p>11. To the right of this line of text, 
				<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">Lacy</name> has drawn a 1 3/4-inch oval and written "Report
				of 
				<name key="pn0001756" reg="Wheat, John Thomas" type="person">Prof.</name>" at the top of the oval outside its
				circumference. 
				<name key="pn0001756" reg="Wheat, John Thomas" type="person">Wheat's</name> endnote, written in pencil begins below 
				<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">Lacy's</name> signature: "<name key="pn0000941" reg="Lacy, James Horace" type="person">Mr
				  Lacy</name> has more than ordinary talent for this exercise. He understands the
				<hi rend="underscore">forms</hi> of composition very well. His style will be
				improved by going over every sentence &amp; throwing out all words that are not
				absolutely required to express the idea intended. By such condensation, both
				energy &amp; elegance will be gained."</p></note> 
		</div1> 
	 </back> 
  </text> 
</TEI.2>