<!DOCTYPE TEI.2 SYSTEM "http://docsouth.unc.edu/dtds/teixlite.dtd">
<TEI.2>
    <teiHeader date.created="06-22-2005" id="First_Public_University" type="mss">
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>
                    <hi rend="bold">William Hooper's Critique of Instruction at the University of
                        North Carolina, December 19, 1833:</hi> Electronic Edition.</title>
                <author> Hooper, William, 1792-1876</author>
                <funder>Funding from the University Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel
                    Hill supported the electronic publication of this title.</funder>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Text transcribed by</resp>
                    <name>Bari Helms</name>
                </respStmt>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Images scanned by</resp>
                    <name>Bari Helms</name>
                </respStmt>
                <respStmt>
                    <resp>Text encoded by</resp>
                    <name>Brian Dietz</name>
                </respStmt>
            </titleStmt>
            <editionStmt>
                <edition>First Edition, <date>2005</date>
                </edition>
            </editionStmt>
            <extent>ca. 14K</extent>
            <publicationStmt>
                <publisher>The University Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill </publisher>
                <pubPlace>Chapel Hill, North Carolina</pubPlace>
                <date>2005</date>
                <availability>
                    <p>© This work is the property of the University of North Carolina at Chapel
                        Hill. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching and
                        personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the
                        text</p>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <biblFull>
                    <titleStmt>
                        <title type="collection">University of North Carolina Papers (#40005),
                            University Archives, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</title>
                        <title type="document">William Hooper's Critique of Instruction at the
                            University of North Carolina, December 19, 1833</title>
                        <author>W. Hooper</author>
                    </titleStmt>
                    <extent>4 pages, 4 page images</extent>
                    <publicationStmt>
                        <date value="1833-12-19">1833</date>
                        <authority/>
                    </publicationStmt>
                    <notesStmt>
                        <note type="call number">Call number 40005 (University Archives, University
                            of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)</note>
                    </notesStmt>
                </biblFull>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <projectDesc>
                <p>The electronic edition is a part of the University of North Carolina at Chapel
                    Hill digital library, <hi rend="italics">Documenting the American South</hi>.
                </p>
            </projectDesc>
            <editorialDecl>
                <p>The text has been encoded using the recommendations for Level 5 of the TEI in
                    Libraries Guidelines.</p>
                <p>Originals are in the University Archives, University of North Carolina at Chapel
                    Hill.</p>
                <p>Original grammar, punctuation, and spelling have been preserved.</p><p>DocSouth staff created a 600 dpi uncompressed TIFF file for each image. The TIFF images were then saved as JPEG images at 100 dpi for web access.</p>
                <p>Page images can be viewed and compared in parallel with the text.</p>
                <p>Any hyphens occurring in line breaks have been removed, and the trailing part of
                    a word has been joined to the preceding line.</p>
                <p>All quotation marks, em dashes and ampersand have been transcribed as entity
                    references.</p>
                <p>All double right and left quotation marks are encoded as ".</p>
                <p>All single right and left quotation marks are encoded as '.</p>
                <p>All em dashes are encoded as —.</p>
                <p>Indentation in lines has not been preserved.</p>
            </editorialDecl>
            <classDecl>
                <taxonomy id="unc_history">
                    <bibl>
                        <title/>
                    </bibl>
                </taxonomy>
            </classDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
        <profileDesc>
            <langUsage>
                <language id="eng">English</language>
            </langUsage>
            <textClass>
                <keywords scheme="unc_history">
                    <list>
                        <item> Any special keywords assigned for this project </item>
                    </list>
                </keywords>
            </textClass>
        </profileDesc>
        <revisionDesc>
            <change>
                <date>2005-06-23,</date>
                <respStmt>
                    <name>Brian Dietz</name>
                    <resp/>
                </respStmt>
                <item>finished TEI/XML encoding.</item>
            </change>
        </revisionDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text id="unc04-19">
        <body>
            <div1 type="official document">
                <pb id="unc04-19-p01" n="1"/>
                <head>
                    <name key="pn0000783" reg="Hooper, William (b. 1792)" type="person" rend="yes">William
                        Hooper's</name> Critique of Instruction at the <name key="name0001146" reg="University of North Carolina" type="organization">University of North
                        Carolina</name>, December 19, 1833</head>
                <p>The distribution of instruction &amp; the conduct of business in the <name key="name0001146" reg="University of North Carolina" type="organization">University</name> of this <name key="name0000745" reg="North Carolina" type="place">State</name> is attended with evils which cannot be denied
                    &amp; which ought no longer to be concealed or endured, if a remedy is
                    practicable.</p>
                <p>While ample provision is made for the tuition of the two upper classes, and the
                    professors can hardly find recitations enough in those two classes to give
                    themselves appropriate employment, the two younger classes are consigned almost
                    totally to the instruction of the tutors. Yet do these two inferior classes
                    compose a considerable majority of the youth of the <name key="name0001146" reg="University of North Carolina" type="organization">University</name>.
                    While the Senior &amp; Junior classes generally contain only from fifteen to
                    twenty, the Sophomore &amp; Freshman will contain often thirty &amp;
                    thirty five, each. Of the youth who enter, we may say half never reach the
                    Junior year, certainly half never graduate. Is it then reasonable or right that
                    so large a proportion of the academical youth of our Country should be under
                    such incompetent instruction for two years out of four of their collegiate
                    course? For who are the Tutors to whom their instruction is committed? Almost
                    always recent graduates, taken just from the ranks of the Students, without
                    authority of character, &amp; of scholarship scarcely a whit superior to the
                    classes they are destined to instruct. For the salaries given<pb id="unc04-19-p02" n="2"/>can induce none to accept the tutorship but such as
                    are in immediate want of funds &amp; then only for a year or six months. As
                    soon as they hear of a vacancy elsewhere, they leave the <name key="name0001146" reg="University of North Carolina" type="organization">College</name>, all
                    the benefit of their acquired knowledge &amp; experience &amp; authority
                    is lost to us, &amp; the business is again shifted into the hands of
                    novices.</p>
                <p>Nor is the effect upon <hi rend="underscore">discipline</hi> less disastrous than
                    upon scholarship. Such tutors have no weight of character. Feeling their
                    impotence they scarcely venture to interfere with the students, but let them
                    have pretty much their own way, &amp; get along as easily to themselves as
                    they can. Indeed it is not much to be expected that such novices —
                    equals today &amp; superiors tomorrow — should command respect
                    &amp; enforce good order.</p>
                <p>What has been the result of this state of things? We may fearlessly say, almost a
                    total prostration of good scholarship and a considerable relaxation of
                    discipline. The examinations bear testimony to the lamentable effects of
                    tutorial instruction. It is in vain to attempt to repair the damage after they
                    mount up into the superior classes. Inveterate habits of idleness &amp;
                    loose scholarship have been contracted. Rude, tumultuous manners &amp;
                    boisterous behavior at the door of the recitation room which we are compelled to
                    witness too often, bear sad proof of the want of respect &amp; authority of
                    such tutors as we are now obliged to put up with.</p>
                <p>The Professor of Languages, to whose Department<pb id="unc04-19-p03" n="3"/>two
                    thirds of the studies of the inferior classes belong, has for many years seen
                    &amp; sorely deplored the state of things, &amp; feels that he cannot be
                    responsible for scholarship while it continues. Every man at all qualified to
                    judge, knows, that a professor can do little to promote scholarship if those who
                    train them for his hands are incompetent. If the <name key="name0000107" reg="Board                         of Trustees" type="organization" rend="yes">Trustees</name> consider the Classical part
                    of education valuable, as they have shown that they do by assigning it so large
                    a portion of the academical course, both preparatory &amp; collegiate, let
                    them make respectable provision for it, &amp; not stigmatize it by
                    consigning it to the hands of novices.</p>
                <p>Unless this is done parents had better keep their sons in the academies during
                    the first two years of the college course &amp; not send them to the <name key="name0001146" reg="University of North Carolina" type="organization">University</name> till they are qualified to enter the Junior Class. For is
                    it worth while, is it expedient, that such expense should be incurred as is
                    involved in a University education, if better instruction can be had at their
                    own homes? But if parents <hi rend="underscore">do</hi> choose to incur the
                    expense, &amp; to hazard their sons' morals at College, ought they to be
                    imposed on with the belief that the University will of course impart more able
                    &amp; thorough knowledge, when in fact, for two whole years their sons are
                    under teaching inferior to what they have left behind them at their own homes?
                    Let us tell them in good faith, you had better keep your sons at home for they
                    will be better taught there, with far less expense to you &amp; less
                    jeopardy of their virtue at that tender age.</p>
                <pb id="unc04-19-p04" n="4"/>
                <p>According to the present arrangement of professorships the whole instruction of 3
                    professors &amp; the partial instruction of a 4<hi rend="sup">th</hi> will
                    be given to the Senior Class; the Junior Class will have the advantage of being
                    instructed by three Professors, while the Sophomores &amp; Freshman will not
                    have any share of this large furniture of means but be thrown upon the mercy of
                    any accidental tutor who may be willing to accept the pittance we give. That is,
                    of 100 &amp; more <name key="name0001146" reg="University of North Carolina" type="organization">University</name> youth, about 65 or 70 are starved with
                    a meager taste of knowledge, while the favoured minority are stuffed even to
                    surfeiting.</p>
                <p>The above complaints might be made with as much propriety by the mathematical
                    Professor, but as his studies occupy only about a third of the two first years
                    while the classical Professor's occupy nearly two thirds, he does not feel the
                    evil as heavily. But the new professorship will in some measure remedy the
                    mathematical part because the Professor will be enabled to turn more of his
                    attention to the inferior classes, while the classical Department will be left
                    as defenseless as ever, unless the <name key="name0000107" reg="Board of Trustees" type="organization">Trustees</name> should be roused by this representation
                    to employ tutors of higher qualifications. It is my sincere &amp; deliberate
                    opinion, that two tutors for $600 would be worth more than the 3 to
                    whom we now give $400 both for tuition &amp; government.</p>
                <closer>
                    <signed>
                        <name key="pn0000783" reg="Hooper, William (b. 1792)" type="person">W.
                        Hooper</name>
                    </signed>
                    <dateline>
                        <date>Dec. 19<hi rend="sup">th</hi> 1833</date>
                    </dateline>
                </closer>
            </div1>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI.2>