Thoughts on environmentalism and consumer rights
Talmadge addresses the growing prominence of environmentalism and consumerism during his years in the United States Senate. Focusing particularly on the impact of Ralph Nader on the ways in which the federal government sought to rectify pollution and ensure protection of the environment, Talmadge contends that the government was trying to do too much too fast. According to Talmadge, environmentalism and consumer rights issues had come to replace civil rights as "hot topic" movements and the political solutions offered tended to cause more problems than they solved.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Herman Talmadge, July 29 and August 1, 1975. Interview A-0331-2. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- JACK NELSON:
-
Let me get your views on another man that you mentioned to me the other
day, who has had a tremendous impact in this country. Some people think
that it has been mostly for the good and some people think that it has
been mostly for the bad and that is Ralph Nader, who burst on the scene
a few years ago.
- SENATOR HERMAN TALMADGE:
-
I don't know Nader well, I visited with him a time or two, he came by my
office lobbying for the Consumer Protection Bill that he devised. He is
an intense sort of a zealot, really. I think that it is his mission to
save mankind. I don't doubt but what some of the things that he has
advocated has been in the national interest, others have not. You take
the Clean Air, Clean Water Bill, we probably went too far too fast. That
is one of the reasons that we are having enormous inflationary problems
now. The industry in this country is spending countless billions and
billions of dollars for pollution control that is non-productive. It
earns no income. I can give you an illustration with my personal
automobile. We are going through an enormous energy crisis now. I've got
about a seven year old Oldsmobile 98. It gets fifteen miles to the
gallon. I have got a Cutlass that is a year and a half old, the smallest
car that Oldsmobile makes. It gets about twelve
miles to the gallon. It has got all of Mr. Nader's gear on it and we are
using more energy because of those things. We had representatives of all
the automobile manufacturers before the Finance Committee about ten days
or two weeks ago and all of these safety and pollution devices that we
put on automobiles in the last three or four years have driven up the
price over a thousand dollars a vehicle. That is one of the reasons that
people aren't buying automobiles today, they have gotten so high priced
that they are out of the market and lo and behold, they have suddenly
discovered now that some of the devices that we put on the automobiles
at the request of Mr. Nader create more pollution than they solve.
- JACK NELSON:
-
Why do you think that there has been such a tremendous consumer movement
and environmental protection movement that has caught fire in the past
decade?
- SENATOR HERMAN TALMADGE:
-
This country goes through slogans from time to time and they overreact
frequently. When I first came to the United States Senate, they would
burn your mother at the stake in the name of civil rights. Then it got
to be the environment and of course, the environment needed protection,
but we probably went too far too fast. Then it got to be consumerism and
we passed a multiplicity of consumer protection bills in recent years, I
would think twenty probably. I think that I voted for all of them but
one. But it puts an enormous burden on business, trying to fill out all
these forms and prove all of these things that sometimes they are
criticized for, or to disprove them and the average businessman is just
smothered in red tape coming from Washington. Bureaucratic controls and
bureaucratic regulations. In the final analysis, in a free society like
ours where we have the capitalistic system and
private enterprise, say five firms are manufacturing the same product,
the American people aren't all crazy. They know by the process of use
which one of those products is the most efficient and which is the
cheapest and in the final analysis, the consumer polices their own
product. If you have got junk goods, it won't sell. At least you might
sell it one time, but you don't buy it the second time. Pretty soon,
that business, that firm, is out of business. They can't sell their junk
goods. Of course, the capitalistic competitive system, where you don't
have a monopoly, prevents them from gouging the consumer. If I am
selling a device for a dollar that cost me ten cents, somebody very
quickly will find out how profitable that item is and he will put it on
the market and sell it for twenty cents and then I will cut mine to
eighteen cents and he will cut his to eighteen cents and that is the way
it goes. You've got your competition that regulates the sale of consumer
products.