Evaluating Alabama Governors Folsom and Persons
LeMaistre remembers two Alabama governors. First comes a "believing liberal," Democrat Jim Folsom, who served from 1947 to 1951 and again from 1955 to 1959. Folsom attracted supporters with his convictions, but his behavior was apparently not attractive, although he did motivate some supporters with a stunt involving a mop and a bucket. Persons, who was governor from 1951 to 1955, lacked both the personality and the ideological convictions of Folsom, but LeMaistre recalls that he found some success, especially when, following the assassination of the state's attorney general-elect in Phenix City, he declared martial law there. The assassination generated support for the victim's son, John Patterson, who would go on to exploit racial hatred in his successful run for the governorship in 1958.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with George A. LeMaistre, April 29, 1985. Interview A-0358. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
Now returning really a moment to state
politics. Of course, the Dixiecrat movement occurred right in the middle
of Folsom's first term, and it has been said that Folsom was a Loyalist,
as opposed to the Dixiecrats. That was one of the reasons why he wasn't
successful, but I'm sure it wasn't the only one.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Well, one thing that Jim Folsom did, and Jim Folsom as a politician was
probably as good at appealing to the little man as anybody. He really
paved the way for George Wallace's hold on the little people with small
income or no income and with very little contact with wealth or
industry, and he was at that time sort of building his base with
continued New Deal pronouncements. Jim Folsom was a believing liberal.
He wasn't just mouthing the phrases that came out of the New Deal. He
also was not a very, I guess you'd say, successful image for somebody to
pattern himself after. Jim was such a problem to his own supporters that
you'd never say anybody supported Jim because he admired him. They
admired what he stood for and what he said, maybe, but, for instance,
the Dean of the law School here, Bill Hepburn, considered Jim Folsom the
purest disciple of democracy that we have ever had. He felt like the
big decisions ought to be made by the people.
And for that reason he [Hepburn] supported him although he detested the
way he conducted himself. And I think there were some others who did,
but one by one people would drop off the Folsom bandwagon simply because
they didn't want to be "embarrassed' by their Chief Executive,
or they didn't want to see him conducting himself in a way they thought
was undignified . . . I guess his support was at its peak in the
mid-fifties.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
But what about Gordon Persons, How would you evaluate him?—as
governor and a political figure?
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Gordon was a routine, run-of-the-mine type governor who didn't cause any
big problems.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
He had risen up through the bureaucracy.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Right, and he wasn't a man who would blaze a new trail; he never went off
and said, "We are now going to take this course" and
persuade people to follow him. He would go along the way people had
already started. And he was not a bad governor, but he was not an
exceptional governor either.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
He had been, as I understand it, head of REA (Rural Electrification
Administration) in Alabama, and some of the country people thought he
invented electricity.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Yes, I think that's true. I have a recollection of Dr. Gallalee becoming
very much upset because he landed his helicopter out there by the Denny
Chimes and said that if he landed there again, he was going to have him
arrested even if he was the governor. He thought he was endangering
the young people—putting his bird
down there in the middle of the campus.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
Dr. Gallalee didn't think too much of modern mechanical devices.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
No. But Persons, to his credit, I guess, never really tried to create a
political machine. When Persons moved out of office, there weren't a
great number of people to be taken care of or taken over by somebody
else.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
It was said, or at least I have read, that he was expected to run again
in '58 but that he had a stroke.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
I think that's true. And the only man that I connect with Persons, as a
sort of an insider, was Vernon Merritt who was his Executive Secretary
or whatever you call the number one man in the campaign. As far as I was
concerned, Merritt's greatest achievement was that his mother made
beaten biscuits and sold them, and they were real good. But there was no
Persons machine. He was a very personable man; his habits were good, and
he looked good in comparison with Folsom's habits. But he was not a
great politician . . .
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
But, as I think we've mentioned before, beneath the surface we know now,
looking back, that the racial problems were brewing; there was
increasing pressure for school integration, I mean not in Alabama
particularly; but I guess there was a little in Alabama.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
There was a little in Alabama. It was beginning to bubble. After all, the
Arthurine Lucy thing didn't just happen over night. It was the sort of
thing that built up. And when she came down
here—I've forgotten what the pressure groups' names
were—but her expenses were paid by some activists; her
tuition was paid by one of the groups that Arthur Shores represented.
I've forgotten what the name of it was.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
I don't know whether he represented the NAACP or not.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Maybe that's who it was. I remember it wasn't her father's check or her
check that was cashed; it was furnished by one of the activist groups
that paid for the expenses and the tuition—that sort of
thing. It was the kind of thing that had begun to come to a head and
really boiled over until then. That was what, '58?
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
No, that was '56. You see, the Brown decision was handed down in '54,
but, I think, that decision came too late to affect the elections of
1954 either, well Sparkman ran in 1954 and Folsom ran . . .
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Sparkman was running for a second term, and, as I recall it, he had
opposition, but he didn't have any grass-roots opposition up in north
Alabama which was where the big vote was.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
Laurie Battle and Crommelin were the . . . But he won overwhelmingly, and
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
And actually the campaign was enlivened by all the accusations that
Admiral Crommelin made, but . . .
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
We've talked about before.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Yes, but they really didn't produce any impact on the voters.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
And Folsom won without a runoff over seven candidates. It has been
pointed out that this was the first election after Alabama abolished the
cumulative poll tax. They still had the poll tax, maybe two-year, but
not the cumulative.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Well now, that was the election too in which Folsom made his famous
speech in which he told a mixed audience . . . He said to the audience,
"Now for my black friends in this audience, I want to assure
you that I'm not going to require you to go to school with any white
children." He also said that he didn't bother to answer any of
the bad things that were said about him, his conduct—that
sort of thing. He said his mother told him years ago, "If you
get mud on your clothes and try to rub it off, you will smear it; but if
you let it dry, you can just thump it off." And he said that's
the way he was going to do; just let it dry. He was not going to make
any defense against those charges that had been filed against him, all
of which were probably true.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
That's pretty smart politics.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
It's good politics. Just as his suds bucket and mop were good politics.
Once one of these country farmers came into the meeting and dropped a
dollar into that suds bucket, he had bought his own vote; he was going
to vote for Folsom regardless of what happened after having contributed
to it.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
I just noticed here I had a note that said that after the cumulative poll
tax was abolished, almost a third of the voting age population was
registered whereas in 1938 it had been only ten percent. I think
Virginia Durr said thirteen.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Yes, and I was surprised that it was that small, but I do remember that
it was very small.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
I don't know where that figure came from, but it did boost the number,
and I imagine that practically all of them were white.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
And most of them were women who had just never paid poll tax and didn't
bother with it. This gave them a chance to pay two years poll tax and
vote. You see they had had the right to vote since, what was it, 1921?
Yet they had never exercised it because they never did bother to pay the
poll tax.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
There was also, of course, prior to the Brown Case and the integration
controversy, Persons had to contend with all the trouble over Phenix
City, and that's when all of that was coming to a head.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
That's one of the things that marked Persons as a better than average
governor. I said awhile ago that he was sort of run-of-the mine; he
really wasn't in that respect. He carried out the duties of the office
pretty well. He was not colorful, but he knew that that problem over at
Phenix City had to be dealt with; and he appointed special prosecutors
and got that thing behind us.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
And, of course, in the process gave the impetus to the Pattersons.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Well, when they finished with the cleanup in Phenix City, the next
election, you remember, Albert Patterson was running for Attorney
General, and it was believed that that influenced
some people to bring about his assassination. Those who were accused of
actually having pulled the trigger either were hired gunmen, a gunman,
or had some other grievance. The ones behind it were believed to be in
state politics, and I recall the situation that came up right after that
assassination, everybody sort of turned to John Patterson as the son of
the martyred Albert Patterson. And he more or less swept in over George
Wallace in '58, and he did it on a completely segregationist ticket. He
didn't believe in any mingling of the races, and I would guess that that
had as profound effect on state gubernatorial politics as anything that
ever happened because it converted George Wallace from a liberal to an
out-and-out segregationist. His statement that he "would never
be out-niggered again" has been cleaned up and published by the
national press as "I'll never be out seged again." But
the truth of the matter is that before that time George Wallace had been
quite much of a New Dealer.